Top Banner
H 88 = h 83 – N 03
21

USING RT FOR ORTHO HEIGHTS

Jan 12, 2016

Download

Documents

Clyde

H 88 = h 83 – N 03. HTMOD MEETING FEBRUARY 10, 2011. USING RT FOR ORTHO HEIGHTS. Dr. Lew Lapine Bill Henning. THE TECHNOLOGY SWEET SPOT. SBAS: 2 M H, 6 M V, 0.3 M SMOOTHED H, CHEAP COMMERCIAL DGPS: FEW DM, $$ USCG BEACON: METER+, CHEAP CORS/OPUS: 2 CM h, 5 CM H POST PROCESSED - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: USING RT  FOR ORTHO HEIGHTS

H88 = h83 – N03

Page 2: USING RT  FOR ORTHO HEIGHTS

THE TECHNOLOGY SWEET SPOT• SBAS: 2 M H, 6 M V, 0.3 M SMOOTHED H, CHEAP• COMMERCIAL DGPS: FEW DM, $$• USCG BEACON: METER+, CHEAP• CORS/OPUS: 2 CM h, 5 CM H POST PROCESSED• DIFFERENTIAL LEVELING: 2-4 CM, LABOR/TIME INTENSIVE, $$$• GEODETIC LEVELING: mm, LABOR/TIME INTENSIVE, $$$$$• USER BASE RTK: 2-4 CM H, 2-5 CM V, REQUIRES INITIAL

INVESTMENT, OUTCOME KNOWN IN FIELD• RTN: 3-4 CM H, 5-7 CM V, REQUIRES INITIAL INVESTMENT(BUT ½ OF

RTK), OUTCOME KNOWN IN FIELD• AERIAL MAPPING: .10 M H, .20 M V, $$$• LIDAR: 0.10 – 0.3 M V• SATELLITE IMAGERY: 0.5 METER H RESOLUTION, 3 M LOCATION, $$$• LOW ALTITUDE AERIAL IMAGERY: 2-4 CM H, 3-5 CM V, $$$• TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING: PROJECT SITES ONLY, 0.015 M H,

0.02 M V, REQUIRES INITIAL INVESTMENT

Page 3: USING RT  FOR ORTHO HEIGHTS

≥200 RTN WORLDWIDE≥80 RTN USA≥37 DOT

ACADEMIC/SCIENTIFICSPATIAL REFERENCE CENTERSVARIOUS DOTS + MACHINE GUIDANCECOUNTYCITYGEODETIC SURVEYS (NC, SC)MANUFACTURERSVENDOR NETWORKSAGRICULTUREMA & PA NETWORKS

RTN IN THE USA(JAN 2010)

Page 4: USING RT  FOR ORTHO HEIGHTS

RT FOR ORTHO HEIGHTSADVANTAGES:• LESS TIME- SECONDS ON POINT• LESS LABOR- NO POST PROCESSING, MINIMAL PERSONNEL• LESS EQUIPMENT – ONLY ONE RT UNIT NECESSARY WITH RTN• = LESS $$$

• USER KNOWS POSITION HAS BEEN CAPTURED AT REQUIRED PRECISION

• “GOOD” RELATIVE PRECISION IN HOMOGENEOUS TERRAIN AND USING THE SAME INITIALIZATION

• NEW GEOPOTENTIAL DATUM WILL BE ACCESSED THROUGH ACTIVE STATIONS

DISADVANTAGES:• LESS ACCURACY THAN LEVELING OR STATIC GNSS• REQUIRES ADEQUATE USER KNOWLEDGE OF ALL EFFECTS ON RT GNSS POSITIONING

Page 5: USING RT  FOR ORTHO HEIGHTS

• Access to accurate, reliable heights nationally- Geoid quality, New geopotential datum via active stations

• Consistent Standards across the nation- RTN validation, RTN guidelines

• Consistent Results. Data, technology, and tools that yield regardless of terrain and circumstances- Alignment to NSRS

• Maintainable system/process that will stand the test of time – ARP velocities, Integrity monitoring, User gets new datum via RTN

RT IN RELATION TO GOALS OF NHMP

Page 6: USING RT  FOR ORTHO HEIGHTS

NEW APPLICATIONS IN ”HIGH-ACCURACY” REAL-TIME POSITIONING

• GIS – INFRASTRUCTURE, SIGNAGE, ENVIRONMENTAL, PHOTO CONTROL

• AGRICULTURE• MACHINE GUIDANCE• DEFORMATION MONITORING• TECTONIC/SEISMIC STUDIES• NAVIGATION TO/FROM PORTS• REMOTE SENSING/MAPPING – LIDAR• FAA – NAVIGATION, LANDING, TAXIING• (WEATHER SCIENTISTS – CO-LOCATED RT

IONO/TROPO SENSORS)

Page 7: USING RT  FOR ORTHO HEIGHTS

PRECISION VS. ACCURACY

•“PRECISION” IS A COMPUTED STATISTICAL QUANTITY TO THE SOURCE OF THE MEASUREMENT - ALIGNMENT TO THE RTN OR PASSIVE MARK BASE SHOWS PRECISION OF THE OBSERVATION (PER THE DATA COLLECTOR).

•“ACCURACY” IS A COMPUTED STATISTICAL QUANTITY TO THE REALIZATION OF THE DATUM - ALIGNMENT OF THE RTN OR PASSIVE MARK BASE TO THE NSRS SHOWS ACCURACY (PER ESTABLISHED METHODOLGY)•

Page 8: USING RT  FOR ORTHO HEIGHTS

• B ≥ 4 H & V, KNOWN & TRUSTED POINTS?• B LOCALIZATION RESIDUALS-OUTLIERS?• B DO ANY PASSIVE MARKS NEED TO BE

HELD?• RT BASE WITHIN CALIBRATION (QUALITY TIE

TO NEAREST CALIBRATION POINT)?• B SAME OFFICE & FIELD CALIBRATION USED?

FYI: GNSS CAN PROVIDE GOOD RELATIVE POSITIONS IN A PROJECT WHILE STILL NOT CHECKING TO KNOWNS IN AN ABSOLUTE SENSE

Page 9: USING RT  FOR ORTHO HEIGHTS

BLUNDER CHECKING POINTS WITH OPUS-RS

Page 10: USING RT  FOR ORTHO HEIGHTS

NGS SINGLE BASE GUIDELINES

http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/PUBS_LIB/NGSRealTimeUserGuidelines.v1.1.pdf

• LEGACY EQUIPMENT

• NO CELL COVERAGE

• NEW RT CLOSEST BASE NETWORKS

• MACHINE GUIDANCE AND PRECISION AGRICULTURE USE

Page 11: USING RT  FOR ORTHO HEIGHTS
Page 12: USING RT  FOR ORTHO HEIGHTS

RTN GUIDELINES FOR GNSS POSITIONING–WILL NOT SPECIFY OR

DEFINE A STANDARD, BUT WILL HELP

ADMINISTRATORS AND USERS TO BE AWARE OF

ALL THE ISSUES INVOLVED WITH THIS NEW TECHNOLOGY

60+ CONTRIBUTORS:

•NGS ADVISORS•DOT

•STATE GEODETIC SURVEYS

•GNSS MANUFACTURERS•SRCs

•BLM, NPS

Page 13: USING RT  FOR ORTHO HEIGHTS

THOUGHTS ON ORTHO HEIGHTS ON RTN ARP

• LEVELING TO ARP CREATES A NEW BM EASILY USED IN HT MOD PRACTICES

• DENSIFIES GNSS ON BENCH MARKS = BETTER HYBRID GEOID MODEL

• ARP MONITORED 24/7/365 UNLIKE PASSIVE MARKS• MANY STATE DOTs ARE LEVELING TO THEIR RTN ARP• ROVER HEIGHTS STILL DEPENDENT ON GEOID MODEL FOR

ORTHOS• BY ESTABLISHING PASSIVE BMs AT RTN SITE, ELLIPSOID

DIFFERENCE CAN PRODUCE ARP ORTHOS (IF DESIRED) – BUT THIS EFFECTIVELY GIVES A MEANS OF MONITORING THE PASSIVE BM USING THE RTN STATION BECAUSE THE ARP POSITION IS ALWAYS KNOWN.

Page 14: USING RT  FOR ORTHO HEIGHTS

NTRIP & RTCM-IMPROVING 3D POSITIONING WITH

NEW MESSAGES

Page 15: USING RT  FOR ORTHO HEIGHTS

Standard Solution (RMS:21 mm)Optimized Solution (RMS:13 mm)

RTCM Paper 014-2007-SC104-462

Herbert Landau, Xiaoming Chen, Adrian Kipka, Ulrich Vollath - Trimble Terrasat GmbH

Improving RTK with RTCM Network Residual Messages

2

Positioning improved by up to a factor of 2Initialization time reduced by 30%

Page 16: USING RT  FOR ORTHO HEIGHTS

RTN RESIDUAL RTCM 3.x MESSAGE TYPES

https://ssl29.pair.com/dmarkle/puborder.php

Page 17: USING RT  FOR ORTHO HEIGHTS

STATE SPACE RTCM 3.x MESSAGE TYPES

Page 18: USING RT  FOR ORTHO HEIGHTS

EMERGING NGS ACTIVITIES…..

Page 19: USING RT  FOR ORTHO HEIGHTS

POSSIBLE METHODS OF RTN VALIDATION•OPUS-PROJECTS – NGS APPROVED PROGRAM TO VALIDATE A RTN ADJUSTMENT THAT WAS PERHAPS ACCOMPLISHED WITH GNSS MANUFACTURER’S SOFTWARE OR ANOTHER PROGRAM. •OPUS-S – 3 OR 10% OF RTN ARE NGS CORS WHICH THEN GENERATE OPUS-S SOLUTIONS ON ALL OTHER RTN REFERENCE STATIONS. THESE CAN BE PUSHED TO NGS AND PUBLISHED AS 60 DAY PLOTS, OR MAINTAINED ON A PUBLIC SITE AT THE RTN ADMINISTRATION LOCALE.• FIDUCIAL STATIONS - HIGH STABILITY MARKS ARE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN A RTN. GNSS STATIC PROVIDES X,Y,Z. GEODETIC LEVELING PROVIDES NAVD 88. STATIONS MAY BE BLUE BOOKED. USERS CAN THEN TEST THEIR ROVERS AT THE MARKS TO COMPARE THEIR RESULTS FROM THE RTN WITH THE PUBLISHED VALUES. PILOT PROGRAMS PLANNED IN OREGON AND LOUISIANA.• LETTER OF CERTIFICATION - RTN ADMINISTRATOR SENDS A STATEMENT CERTIFYING THAT AS OF A PARTICULAR DATE THE RTN IS ALIGNED TO THE NATIONAL DATUM AT A CERTAIN LEVEL (2 CM LAT/LONG, 4 CM h ?)• NGS REVIEW - NGS DOES A PERIODICAL REVIEW OF THE RTN STATIONS AND ADJUSTMENTS

Page 20: USING RT  FOR ORTHO HEIGHTS

IDOP VALUES – 4 CORS EXAMPLEBEST IDOP = 1

√ N

THEREFORE, WITH 9 CORS, THE IDOP AT THE CENTROID WOULD BE .33, WITH 4 CORS IT WOULD BE .5 AT THE CENTROID

ADDITION OF RMS OF DISTANCE TO CORS CONTRIBUTING TO THE SOLUTION GIVES FINAL UNITLESS NUMBER

.87.87

.87 .87

.5

.6.7

.8

.8

.7

.6

“IDOP” :THE SUBJECT OF A PAPER BY DRS. CHARLES SCHWARZ, TOM SOLER AND RICHARD SNAY

APPLICATION FOR RTN?

Page 21: USING RT  FOR ORTHO HEIGHTS

ALL THESE COME INTO PLAY TO ENABLE THE STRUCTURE TO CLEAR THE BRIDGE!

•LMSL•NAD 83 •NAVD 88•BATHYMETRY•CHART DATUM•BRIDGE DYNAMICS•BRIDGE DIMENSIONS•SHIP SQUAT•SHIP DIMENSIONS

KNOW YOUR METADATA- UNIFYING THE VERTICALS TO A COMMON DATUM