Top Banner
USING PeMS DATA TO EMPIRICALLY DIAGNOSE FREEWAY BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Robert L. Bertini Portland State University Aaron M. Myton Oregon Department of Transportation TRB 84 th Annual Meeting Washington D.C. January 9-13, 2005
22

USING PeMS DATA TO EMPIRICALLY DIAGNOSE FREEWAY BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Robert L. Bertini Portland State University Aaron M.

Dec 27, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: USING PeMS DATA TO EMPIRICALLY DIAGNOSE FREEWAY BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Robert L. Bertini Portland State University Aaron M.

USING PeMS DATA TO EMPIRICALLY DIAGNOSE FREEWAY BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS

IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Robert L. BertiniPortland State University

Aaron M. MytonOregon Department of

Transportation

TRB 84th Annual Meeting

Washington D.C.

January 9-13, 2005

Page 2: USING PeMS DATA TO EMPIRICALLY DIAGNOSE FREEWAY BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Robert L. Bertini Portland State University Aaron M.

Objectives

• Identify Freeflow Congested Conditions

• Determine Bottleneck Locations

• Measure Queue Discharge Features

• Conclusions

Page 3: USING PeMS DATA TO EMPIRICALLY DIAGNOSE FREEWAY BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Robert L. Bertini Portland State University Aaron M.

• Foundation for Understanding Freeway Operations

• Queues Cause Delays

• Loop Detectors Good Data Source

• Previous Studies– Throughput Increase 2-5% Prior To Queue

– Diverge Bottleneck Identified

• PeMS Provides Opportunity for Detailed Data Analysis

Background

Page 4: USING PeMS DATA TO EMPIRICALLY DIAGNOSE FREEWAY BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Robert L. Bertini Portland State University Aaron M.

Cul

ver D

r.

Uni

vers

ity D

r.

Sand

Can

yon

Ave

.

Hw

y. 1

33

Irvin

e C

ente

r Dr.

Trav

el D

irect

ion

130

110

100

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10

Site Map Loop DetectorStation Number

L E G E N D

110

120

• Four Northbound Lanes

• One Northbound HOV Lane

• Freeway Ramps Between Stations, Except 100/110

140

N

Post-mile

Page 5: USING PeMS DATA TO EMPIRICALLY DIAGNOSE FREEWAY BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Robert L. Bertini Portland State University Aaron M.

Bottleneck Definition

Queued Unqueued

Bottleneck

D e te c to rs

• Queue upstream

• Freely-flowing traffic downstream

• Temporally and spatially variable

Page 6: USING PeMS DATA TO EMPIRICALLY DIAGNOSE FREEWAY BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Robert L. Bertini Portland State University Aaron M.

Data• Freeway Performance Monitoring System (PeMS)

– http://pems.eecs.berkeley.edu/Public

• Single Inductive Loops

• Vehicle Occupancy and Count

• Data Aggregated in 30-sec. Intervals

• On-Ramp/Off-Ramp Data Not Available

• Monday June 1, 1998

Page 7: USING PeMS DATA TO EMPIRICALLY DIAGNOSE FREEWAY BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Robert L. Bertini Portland State University Aaron M.

Methodology• Cumulative Curves – Vehicle Count & Occupancy

• Oblique Plots N and T

Page 8: USING PeMS DATA TO EMPIRICALLY DIAGNOSE FREEWAY BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Robert L. Bertini Portland State University Aaron M.
Page 9: USING PeMS DATA TO EMPIRICALLY DIAGNOSE FREEWAY BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Robert L. Bertini Portland State University Aaron M.

Analysis

Time, t

Culver Dr.

University Dr.

Sand Canyon Ave.

Hwy. 133

Irvine Center Dr.

Travel Direction

0.60

1.60

2.60

3.60

4.60

5.60

7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00

Po

st m

ile

Station140

130120

110100

9080

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

Page 10: USING PeMS DATA TO EMPIRICALLY DIAGNOSE FREEWAY BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Robert L. Bertini Portland State University Aaron M.

-53500

-53000

-52500

-52000

-51500

-51000

-505007:

00

8:00

9:00Time, t

N(7

0,t)

- q0t

', q

0 =

9500

vph

-14000

-13800

-13600

-13400

-13200

-13000

-12800

-12600

T(70

,t) -

b0t

', b

0 =

2400

sec

onds

per

hou

r

T(70,t) - b0(70)t'

N(70,t) - q0(70)t'

1 2 3 4 75 6

1863

9206

7:14

:00

2341

3368

2509

4663

2595 28

81

1403

1017

2

8255

8958

6480

9146

8010

6772

8

7:33

:00

8:39

:00

8:49

:00

8:50

:00

8:57

:00

9:01

:00

7:51

:30

8:16

:30

9 10 11

3578

2705

3199

8880

9367

8904

3271

8629

SEGMENT #

QUEUENO QUEUE

7:41

:30

8130

9762

QU

Culver Dr.

University Dr.

Sand Canyon Ave.

Hwy. 133

Irvine Center Dr.

Travel Direction

Station140

130120

110100

9080

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

Station 70 – Loops 1-4 Oblique N and T

Page 11: USING PeMS DATA TO EMPIRICALLY DIAGNOSE FREEWAY BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Robert L. Bertini Portland State University Aaron M.

Time, t

Culver Dr.

University Dr.

Sand Canyon Ave.

Hwy. 133

Irvine Center Dr.

Travel Direction

0.60

1.60

2.60

3.60

4.60

5.60

7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00

Po

st m

ile

Station140

130120

110100

9080

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

Page 12: USING PeMS DATA TO EMPIRICALLY DIAGNOSE FREEWAY BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Robert L. Bertini Portland State University Aaron M.

-47000

-46500

-46000

-45500

-45000

-44500

-440007:

00

8:00

9:00

Time, t

N(6

0,t)

- q0t

', q

0 =

8500

vph

-11800

-11600

-11400

-11200

-11000

-10800

-10600

-10400

T(60

,t) -

b0t

', b

0 =

2000

sec

onds

per

hou

r

T(60,t) - b0(60)t'

N(60,t) - q0(60)t'15

1085

20

1 2 4 5 6 7 8

2010 25

82

3094

2438 16

31

1085

9525 95

60

7809

8379

7649

6103

7:14

:00

7:31

:30

7:34

:30

8:22

:00

8:39

:30

9:01

:00

2838

7906

8289

7511

2240

3172

9 10

7:54

:00

8:01

:00

3

7:22

:00

9208

1962

SEGMENT #

QUEUENO QUEUE

QU

Culver Dr.

University Dr.

Sand Canyon Ave.

Hwy. 133

Irvine Center Dr.

Travel Direction

Station140

130120

110100

9080

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

Station 60 – Loops 1-4, Oblique N and T

Page 13: USING PeMS DATA TO EMPIRICALLY DIAGNOSE FREEWAY BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Robert L. Bertini Portland State University Aaron M.

Time, t

Culver Dr.

University Dr.

Sand Canyon Ave.

Hwy. 133

Irvine Center Dr.

Travel Direction

0.60

1.60

2.60

3.60

4.60

5.60

7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00

Po

st m

ile

Station140

130120

110100

9080

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

Page 14: USING PeMS DATA TO EMPIRICALLY DIAGNOSE FREEWAY BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Robert L. Bertini Portland State University Aaron M.

Time, t

Culver Dr.

University Dr.

Sand Canyon Ave.

Hwy. 133

Irvine Center Dr.

Travel Direction

0.60

1.60

2.60

3.60

4.60

5.60

7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00

Po

st m

ile

Queue 1

Queue 2

Queue 4

Queue 5

Queue 7

Queue 3

Queue 6

Queue 9

Queue 10

Queue 8

Station140

130120

110100

9080

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

Queue - ActivationQueue - Deactivation

LEGEND

Page 15: USING PeMS DATA TO EMPIRICALLY DIAGNOSE FREEWAY BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Robert L. Bertini Portland State University Aaron M.

Results

Page 16: USING PeMS DATA TO EMPIRICALLY DIAGNOSE FREEWAY BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Robert L. Bertini Portland State University Aaron M.

Conclusions

• Ten Queues Formed at Five Locations• Flow Reduction of 3-15%• No Queue in HOV Lanes• Bottlenecks Typically Activated Near Ramps• No Speed Threshold Needed

Page 17: USING PeMS DATA TO EMPIRICALLY DIAGNOSE FREEWAY BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Robert L. Bertini Portland State University Aaron M.

Future Research

• Study site on different days• Manual replication of procedure• Develop semi-automated method

Page 18: USING PeMS DATA TO EMPIRICALLY DIAGNOSE FREEWAY BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Robert L. Bertini Portland State University Aaron M.

Acknowledgements• Prof. Pravin Varaiya and Prof. Alexander

Skabardonis, U.C. Berkeley• Dr. Karl Petty, Berkeley Transportation Systems• Pherak Hay, Vu Mai, and Roger Lindgren

Page 19: USING PeMS DATA TO EMPIRICALLY DIAGNOSE FREEWAY BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Robert L. Bertini Portland State University Aaron M.

Station 50, Occupancy

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

12:00 AM 2:00 AM 4:00 AM 6:00 AM 8:00 AM 10:00 AM 12:00 PM 2:00 PM 4:00 PM 6:00 PM 8:00 PM 10:00 PM 12:00 AM

Time

Occ

up

ancy

Page 20: USING PeMS DATA TO EMPIRICALLY DIAGNOSE FREEWAY BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Robert L. Bertini Portland State University Aaron M.

Station 40, Occupancy

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

12:00 AM 2:00 AM 4:00 AM 6:00 AM 8:00 AM 10:00 AM 12:00 PM 2:00 PM 4:00 PM 6:00 PM 8:00 PM 10:00 PM 12:00 AM

Time

Occ

up

ancy

Page 21: USING PeMS DATA TO EMPIRICALLY DIAGNOSE FREEWAY BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Robert L. Bertini Portland State University Aaron M.

-53500

-53000

-52500

-52000

-51500

-51000

-50500

7:00

8:00

9:00

Time, t

N(7

0,t)

- q

0t',

q0

= 9

500

vph

-14000

-13800

-13600

-13400

-13200

-13000

-12800

-12600

T(7

0,t)

- b

0t',

b0

= 2

400

seco

nd

s p

er h

ou

r

T(70,t) - b0(70)t'

N(70,t) - q0(70)t'

1 2 3 4 75 6

1863

9206

7:14

:00

2341

3368

2509

4663

2595 28

81

1403

1017

2

8255

8958

6480

9146

8010

6772

8

7:33

:00

8:39

:00

8:49

:00

8:50

:00

8:57

:00

9:01

:00

7:51

:30

8:16

:30

9 10 11

3578

2705

3199

8880

9367

8904

3271

8629

SEGMENT #

QUEUENO QUEUE

7:41

:30

8130

9762

QU

Station 70 – Loops 1-4 Oblique N and T

Page 22: USING PeMS DATA TO EMPIRICALLY DIAGNOSE FREEWAY BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Robert L. Bertini Portland State University Aaron M.

-47000

-46500

-46000

-45500

-45000

-44500

-44000

7:00

8:00

9:00

Time, t

N(6

0,t)

- q

0t',

q0

= 8

500

vph

-11800

-11600

-11400

-11200

-11000

-10800

-10600

-10400

T(6

0,t)

- b

0t',

b0

= 2

000

seco

nd

s p

er h

ou

r

T(60,t) - b0(60)t'

N(60,t) - q0(60)t'

1510

8520

1 2 4 5 6 7 8

2010 25

82

3094

2438 16

31

1085

9525 95

60

7809

8379

7649

6103

7:14

:00

7:31

:30

7:34

:30

8:22

:00

8:39

:30

9:01

:00

2838

7906

8289

7511

2240

3172

9 10

7:54

:00

8:01

:00

3

7:22

:00

9208

1962

SEGMENT #

QUEUENO QUEUE

QU

Station 60 – Loops 1-4, Oblique N and T