Using Logic Models to Think about Outcomes and Metrics Partnerships for Environmental Public Health Evaluation Metrics Manual November 4, 2011 Helena L. Davis Program Analysis Branch National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [email protected]/919-316-4813
19
Embed
Using Logic Models to Think about Outcomes and Metrics Partnerships for Environmental Public Health Evaluation Metrics Manual
Using Logic Models to Think about Outcomes and Metrics Partnerships for Environmental Public Health Evaluation Metrics Manual. November 4, 2011 Helena L. Davis Program Analysis Branch National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [email protected] /919-316-4813. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Using Logic Models to Think about Outcomes and Metrics
Partnerships for Environmental Public Health Evaluation Metrics Manual
November 4, 2011
Helena L. DavisProgram Analysis Branch
National Institute of Environmental Health [email protected] /919-316-4813
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
• Mission: reduce the burden of human illness and disability by understanding how the environment influences the development and progression of human disease
• The Division of Extramural Research and Training funds a broad portfolio of research across the country and abroad
Partnerships for Environmental Public Health (PEPH)
• PEPH Program Objectives: – Prevent, reduce or eliminate environmental exposures that may lead to adverse
health outcomes in communities
– Increase the impact of environmental public health research at local, regional, and national levels
• Partners include community members, scientists, educators, health care providers, public health officials, and policy makers
• Participatory development– Request for Information, Winter 2007-8
– Workshop, June 2008
Why create a PEPH Evaluation Metrics Manual? • PEPH Stakeholders identified evaluation metrics as
a clear need: – RFI & Workshop, 2008
• Results not published in peer reviewed biomedical journals
• Helpful to establish a common language around activities, outputs, and impacts among those involved in PEPH projects