USING CUE CARDS MEDIA IN IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY (A Pre Experimental Research at The Tenth grade of SMA Muhammadiyah Limbung) A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education of Makassar Muhammadiyah University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for Degree of Education in English Department EKA LISYA ROSALINDA 10535539113 ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF MAKASSAR 2017
114
Embed
USING CUE CARDS MEDIA IN IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING …
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
USING CUE CARDS MEDIA IN IMPROVING STUDENTS’
SPEAKING ABILITY
(A Pre Experimental Research at The Tenth grade of SMA
Muhammadiyah Limbung)
A Thesis
Submitted to the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education of
Makassar Muhammadiyah University in Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirement for Degree of Education in English Department
EKA LISYA ROSALINDA
10535539113
ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF MAKASSAR
2017
SURAT PERNYATAAN
Saya yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini:
Nama : Eka Lisya Rosalinda
NIM : 10535 5391 13
Program Studi : Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
Judul Skripsi : Using Cue Cards Media in Improving Students’
Speaking
Ability
Dengan ini menyatakan bahwa:
Skripsi yang saya ajukan di depan Tim Penguji adalah hasil karya sendiri,
bukan hasil ciplakan atau dibuatkan oleh siapapun.
Demikian pernyataan ini saya buat dengan sebenarnya dan saya bersedia
menerima sanksi apabila pernyataan ini tidak benar.
Makassar, Desember 2017
Yang membuat pernyataan
Eka Lisya Rosalinda NIM: 10535 5391 13
SURAT PERJANJIAN
Saya yang bertanda tangan dibawah ini:
Nama : Eka Lisya Rosalinda
NIM : 10535 5391 13
Program Studi : Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
Judul Skripsi : Using Cue Cards Media in Improving Students’
Speaking
Ability
Dengan ini menyatakan perjanjian sebagai berikut:
1. Mulai dari penyusunan proposal sampai selesai penyusunan skripsi ini,
saya akan menyusun sendiri skripsi saya ( tidak dibuatkan oleh siapapun ).
2. Dalam penyusunan skripsi,saya akan selalu melakukan konsultasi dengan
pembimbing yang telah ditetapkan oleh pimpinan fakultas.
3. Saya tidak akan melakukan penciplakan (plagiat) dalam penyusunan
skripsi saya.
4. Apabila saya melanggar perjanjian saya pada point 1, 2, dan 3, saya
bersedia menerima sanksi sesuai aturan yang berlaku.
Demikian perjanjian ini saya buat dengan penuh kesadaran.
Makassar, Desember 2017
Yang Membuat Penelitian
Eka Lisya Rosalinda NIM: 10535 5391 13
MOTTOS
In order to SUCCEED we
must first believe than we can
-Nikos Kazantzakis-
Never stop learning, because
life never stops teaching
-Thinkpoz-
Great things never came
from comfort zones
The are no sad
endings for those who
trust Allah
ABSTRACT
EKA LISYA ROSALINDA. 2017. Using Cue Cards Media in Improving
Students’ Speaking Ability (A Pre Experimental Research at the Tenth Grade of
SMA Muhammadiyah Limbung). English Education Department Faculty of
Teacher Training and Education, Muhammadiyah University of Makassar. Under
supervisors Ratna Dewi and Ilmiah.
This research aimed to find out the improvement of students‟ Speaking
Aability by the implementation of Cue Cards Media at the Tenth grade students of
SMA Muhammadiyah Limbung that focused on students‟ fluency and accuracy.
The method of this research was a pre-experimental design that consisted
of one group pre-test and post-test design class. The sample of this research was
the Tenth grade students with the total number of subject were 35 students. The
instruments of data collection for this research were pre-test and post-test.
The research findings indicatped that the Tenth grade students of SMA
Muhammadiyah Limbung were very low in speaking ability. But after treatment,
their speaking ability were significantly improved. It was proven by the result of
the mean score obtained by the students through pre-test was 3.90 which was
classified as poor category and the mean score of the students in post-test was
7.21 which was classified as Average category. While the value of t-test was
greater than the value of t-table (5.79 > 2.032). It was indicated that the Null
Hypothesis (H0) was rejected and the Alternative Hypothesis (H1) was accepted.
It could be concluded that the application of Cue Cards Media is effective to
improve the students‟ speaking ability.
Keyword : Cue Cards, Media, Teaching, Speaking
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Alhamdulillah Rabbil „Alamin Assaholatu Assalamu ala „alihi
Muhammad, the researcher express her gratitude to the almighty Allah
Subahanahu Wata‟ala that has given his guidance, mercy and health to complete
writing of this thesis. Shalawat and salam are addressed to the final and chosen
messenger, the prophet Muhammad Shallallahu Alaihi wa Sallam.
The researcher realized that in arranging this thesis, many people have
given their help, motivation, suggestion, and useful advice. Therefore, the writer
would like to express her appreciation and sincere thanks to:
1. My lovely parents (H. Kamaruddin and Hj. Sumarni), Thank you so much for
the loved, sacrifice, affection, motivation, patience, and greatest prayer for my
bright future.
2. Rector Muhammadiyah University of Makassar, Dr.H.Abdul Rahman Rahim,
SE. MM.
3. Erwin Akib, M.Pd.,Ph.D, the dean of training and education faculty.
4. Ummi Khaerati Syam, S.Pd,.M.Pd, the head of English education department.
5. Supervisor who help very much from the beginning to the end of this work
- dark skin : kulit gelap - white skin : kulit putih
- thick lips : bibir tebal - brown skin : kulit coklat
- smooth skin : kulit lembut - tall : tinggi
- short : pendek - slim : langsing
- fat : gemuk - thin : kurus
- strong : kuat
Example of Sentence:
She is Julie. Dia adalah Julie.
She has straight hair. Dia memiliki rambut lurus.
Her hair is fairly black. Rambutnya hitam bersinar.
She is very tall. Dia sangat tinggi
c. Contoh Kalimat:
She is Julie. Dia adalah Julie.
She has straight hair. Dia memiliki rambut lurus.
Her hair is fairly black. Rambutnya hitam bersinar.
She is very tall. Dia sangat tinggi
d. Example of describing people:
e. Cue cards:
Quess the cue cards by using yes or no question with your partner. Than, mention
the description on the cue cards!
F. Metode Pembelajaran/Teknik:
Cue cards Media
Michael Douglas is a very famous and popular American actor. He is about
sixty years old. He is a slim person and he is average height. He has got
light brown eyes and short fair hair. His wife is a very beautiful British
actress who is named Catherine Zeta-Johns, she has got green eyes and long
straight black hair. They have got a daughter who is two years old. They all
live in the United States of America.
Barack Obama
-Clever
-Hard worker
-Dark skin
Oki Setiana Dewi
-Beautiful
-Cute
-White skin
G. Strategi Pembelajaran
Kegiatan Langkah Pembelajaran Alokasi
Waktu
Awal
Menyapa siswa dengan mengucapkan salam dan
menanyakan kabar siswa dalam bahasa Inggris
Menyampaikan materi dan tujuan pembelajaran yang
ingin dicapai
Siswa diminta untuk mengingat hal-hal yang
berkenaan dengan materi, Kemudian
mendeskripsikannya.
Inti
Pertemuan Ke 1-2
Guru mengelompokkan siswa dalam bentuk pasangan
(work in pair)
Setiap pasangan mendapatkan 1 kartu dengan gambar
yang telah ditentukan.
Salah satu siswa dalam kelompok pasangan, diminta
untuk melihat gambar pada kartu, sedangkan siswa
lainnya akan menebak gambar “Quessing the picture”
dengan menggunakan “yes or no” questions. E.g: “Is it
girl/boy?”
Setiap pasangan menyimpulkan pendapat mereka
mengenai Cue Cards yang telah berhasil ditebak.
Akhir
Guru bersama siswa menyimpulkan materi yang
sudah dipelajari
Melakukan refleksi terhadap kegiatan yang sudah
dipelajari dengan cara meminta salah seorang siswa
untuk mempraktekkan kembali materi yang telah
dipelajari, sedangkan siswa yang lainnya diminta
untuk memberi komentar.
Mengakhiri pembelajaran dengan mengucapkan
hamdalah
H. Sumber/Bahan/Alat
Buku, Internet
Kertas, Picture, Pensil Warna,Gunting, dll
I. Penilaian
1. Indikator, Teknik, Bentuk, dan Contoh.
No. Indikator Teknik Bentuk Contoh
1. Mendeskripsikan seseorang
dengan tepat dan pasih
Tes Lisan
Mendeskripsikan
gambar
Describe the cue
cards in front of
class!
2. InstrumenPenilaian
Describe the cue cards using yes or no question with your partner. Then,
perform your description in front of the class!
3. PedomanPenilaian
a. Accuracy
Classification Score Criteria
Excellent 6 Pronunciation is only very slightly influenced by the mother-tongue. Two or three minor grammatical and lexical errors.
Very good 5 Pronunciation is slightly influenced by the mother-tongue. A few minor grammatical and lexical errors but most utterances are correct.
Good 4 Pronunciation is still moderately influenced by the mother-tongue but no serious phonological errors. A few grammatical and lexical errors but only one or two majors causing confusion.
Average 3 Pronunciation is influenced by the mother-tongue but only a few serious phonological errors. Several grammatical and lexical errors, some of which cause confusion.
Poor 2 Pronunciation is seriously influenced by mother-tongue with errors causing a breakdown in communication. Many ‘basic’ grammatical and lexical errors.
Very poor 1 Serious Pronunciation errors as well as many ‘basic’ grammatical and lexical errors. no evidence of having mastered of any language skill and areas practiced in the course.
b. Fluency
Classification Score Criteria
Excellent 6 Speak without too great an effort with a fairly wide
range of expression. Searches for words occasionally by
only one or two unnatural pauses.
Very Good 5 Has to make an effort at times to search for words.
Nevertheless, smooth delivery on the whole and only a
few unnatural pauses.
Good 4 Although he has to make an effort and search for words,
there are not too many unnatural pauses. Fairly smooth
delivery mostly. Occasionally fragmentary but succeeds
in conveying the general meaning. Fair range of
expression.
Average 3 Has to make an effort for much of time. Often has to
search for the desire meaning. Rather halting delivery.
Almost gives up making the effort at times limited.
Poor 2 Long pauses while he researches for the desired
meaning. Frequently fragmentary and halting delivery.
Almost give up making the effort at times. Limited range
of expression.
Very poor 1 Full of long and unnatural pauses. Very halting and
fragmentary delivery. At times gives up making the
effort. Very limited range of expression.
X mean Score =
x 10
1) Calculating the mean score of the students‟ speaking test by using the
following formula:
=
Where: X : The mean score
∑x :
N :
2) The result from the convert score put in this score classification:
Score Classification
9.6 – 10 Excellent
8.6 – 9.5 Very good
7.6 – 8.5 Good
6.6 – 7.5 Fairly good
5.6 – 6.5 Fair
3.6 – 5.5 Poor
0 – 3.5 Very poor
Makassar, Oktober 2017
Guru Mata Pelajaran Mahasiswi
Nur Andriani, S.Pd Eka Lisya Rosalinda
NBM. 1056259 Nim. 10535539113
RENCANA PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN
(RPP)
Nama Sekolah : SMA Muhammadiyah Limbung
Mata Pelajaran : Bahasa Inggris
Kelas/Semester : X / I
Alokasi Waktu : 4 x 45 menit
Topik Pembelajaran : Describing Object
Pertemuan Ke- : 3-4
B. Standar Kompetensi
Berbicara
10. Mengungkapkan makna dalam teks fungsional pendek dan monolog
sederhana berbentuk narrative, descriptive dan news item dalam konteks
kehidupan sehari-hari.
B. Kompetensi Dasar
1.2 Mengungkapkan makna dalam teks monolog sederhana dengan
menggunakan ragam bahasa lisan secara akurat, lancar dan berterima
dalam konteks kehidupan sehari-hari dalam teks berbentuk: narrative,
descriptive, dan news item.
C. Indikator Pencapaian Kompetensi
Mengetahui cara mendeskripsikan benda dengan benar dan tepat.
Mengetahui cara menyampaikan deskripsi benda dengan pasih/lancar.
F. Tujuan Pembelajaran
Siswa dapat mendeskripsikan benda dengan benar dan tepat.
Dalam mendeskripsikan benda, Siswa dapat mengungkap dengan cara
yang pasih/lancar.
G. Materi Pokok
2.Describing Object
Descriptive text adalah sebuah text dimana gagasan utamanya disampaikan
dengan cara menggambarkan secara jelas objek, tempat, atau peristiwa yang
sedang menjadi topik kepada pembaca. Sehingga pembaca seolah-olah merasakan
langsung apa yang sedang diungkapkan dalam teks tersebut.
Describing Object adalah mendeskripsikan benda dengan melibatkan kesan
Paragraf yang digambarkan dijelaskan secara sangat jelas dan rinci serta
melibatkan kesan indera.
Ketika pembaca membaca teks deskripsi, maka seolah-olah merasakan
langsung apa yang sedang dibahas di dalam teks.
Teks deskripsi menjelaskan ciri-ciri fisik objek, seperti bentuk, ukuran,
warna, atau ciri-ciri psikis/keadaan suatu objek dengan rinci
a. Example of describing object:
My Favorite shoes
I have a lot of shoes. But I have one favorite shoe. It is blue shoes that my mother
gives me last year. Since then, I always use these shoes when I can. I like these
shoes because it is so comfort. And the color also blue. I like blue. I always use
my favorite shoes carefully, because I do not want to break it.
My Favorite Book
I love reading book. My favorite book is Harry Potter series. I have read all of the
series. I love these books because they are so imaginative. The story is so
amazing. When read the books, sometimes I imagine my self is studying at
Howard and learn magic. My favorite character of the book is harmony. She is
cute and smart. I want to be like her.
b. Cue cards
Describing Classroom object!
F. Metode Pembelajaran/Teknik:
Cue cards Media
G. Strategi Pembelajaran
Kegiatan Langkah Pembelajaran Alokasi
Waktu
Awal
Menyapa siswa dengan mengucapkan salam dan
menanyakan kabar siswa dalam bahasa Inggris
Menyampaikan materi dan tujuan pembelajaran yang
ingin dicapai
Siswa diminta untuk mengingat hal-hal yang
berkenaan dengan materi, Kemudian
mendeskripsikannya.
Chair
-Made of wood
-brown -hard
-smooth
Pencil
-Made of wood
-Red and black color
-hard
-smooth
Eraser
-made from rubber
-bendy -soft
-small
Inti
Pertemuan Ke 3-4
Guru mengelompokkan siswa dalam bentuk pasangan
(work in pair)
Setiap pasangan mendapatkan kartu dengan gambar
yang telah ditentukan.
Salah satu siswa dalam kelompok pasangan, diminta
untuk melihat gambar pada kartu, sedangkan siswa
lainnya akan menebak gambar “Quessing the picture”
dengan menggunakan “yes or no” questions. E.g: “Is it
made of wood or not?”
Setiap pasangan menyimpulkan pendapat mereka
mengenai Cue Cards yang telah berhasil ditebak.
Akhir
Guru bersama siswa menyimpulkan materi yang
sudah dipelajari
Melakukan refleksi terhadap kegiatan yang sudah
dipelajari dengan cara meminta salah seorang siswa
untuk mempraktekkan kembali materi yang telah
dipelajari, sedangkan siswa yang lainnya diminta
untuk memberi komentar.
Mengakhiri pembelajaran dengan mengucapkan
hamdalah
I. Sumber/Bahan/Alat
Buku, Internet
Kertas, Picture, Pensil Warna,Gunting, dll
J. Penilaian
1. Indikator, Teknik, Bentuk, dan Contoh.
No. Indikator Teknik Bentuk Contoh
1. Mendeskripsikan benda
dengan tepat dan pasih. Tes Lisan
Mendeskripsikan
gambar
Describe the cue cards in front of
class!
3. InstrumenPenilaian
Describe the cue cards using yes or no question with your partner. After
that, perform your description in front of the class!
4. PedomanPenilaian
c. Accuracy
Classification Score Criteria
Excellent 6 Pronunciation is only very slightly influenced by the mother-tongue. Two or three minor grammatical and lexical errors.
Very good 5 Pronunciation is slightly influenced by the mother-tongue. A few minor grammatical and lexical errors but most utterances are correct.
Good 4 Pronunciation is still moderately influenced by the mother-tongue but no serious phonological errors. A few grammatical and lexical errors but only one or two majors causing confusion.
Average 3 Pronunciation is influenced by the mother-tongue but only a few serious phonological errors. Several grammatical and lexical errors, some of which cause confusion.
Poor 2 Pronunciation is seriously influenced by mother-tongue with errors causing a breakdown in communication. Many ‘basic’ grammatical and lexical errors.
Very poor 1 Serious Pronunciation errors as well as many ‘basic’ grammatical and lexical errors. no evidence of having mastered of any language skill and areas practiced in the course.
d. Fluency
Classification Score Criteria
Excellent 6 Speak without too great an effort with a fairly wide
range of expression. Searches for words occasionally by
only one or two unnatural pauses.
Very Good 5 Has to make an effort at times to search for words.
Nevertheless, smooth delivery on the whole and only a
few unnatural pauses.
Good 4 Although he has to make an effort and search for words,
there are not too many unnatural pauses. Fairly smooth
delivery mostly. Occasionally fragmentary but succeeds
in conveying the general meaning. Fair range of
expression.
Average 3 Has to make an effort for much of time. Often has to
search for the desire meaning. Rather halting delivery.
Almost gives up making the effort at times limited.
Poor 2 Long pauses while he researches for the desired
meaning. Frequently fragmentary and halting delivery.
Almost give up making the effort at times. Limited range
of expression.
Very poor 1 Full of long and unnatural pauses. Very halting and
fragmentary delivery. At times gives up making the
effort. Very limited range of expression.
X Mean Score =
x 10
3) Calculating the mean score of the students‟ speaking test by using the
following formula:
=
Where: X : the mean score
∑x :
N :
4) The result from the convert score put in this score classification:
Score Classification
9.6 – 10 Excellent
8.6 – 9.5 Very good
7.6 – 8.5 Good
6.6 – 7.5 Fairly good
5.6 – 6.5 Fair
3.6 – 5.5 Poor
0 – 3.5 Very poor
Makassar, Oktober 2017
Guru Mata Pelajaran Mahasiswi
Nur Andriani, S.Pd Eka Lisya Rosalinda
NBM. 1056259 Nim. 10535539113
RENCANA PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN
(RPP)
Nama Sekolah : SMA Muhammadiyah Limbung
Adjectives for
Describing
Animals
-furry
-ferocious
Animals Parts
-fur
-mane
-snout
-paw
Other Vocabulary
-know -quiet
-playful -cage
-fish -guinea pig
-aquarium -mouse
Mata Pelajaran : Bahasa Inggris
Kelas/Semester : X / I
Alokasi Waktu : 4 x 45 menit
Topik Pembelajaran : Describing Animals
Pertemuan Ke- : 5-6
C. Standar Kompetensi
Berbicara
10. Mengungkapkan makna dalam teks fungsional pendek dan monolog
sederhana berbentuk narrative, descriptive dan news item dalam konteks
kehidupan sehari-hari.
B. Kompetensi Dasar
1.3 Mengungkapkan makna dalam teks monolog sederhana dengan
menggunakan ragam bahasa lisan secara akurat, lancar dan berterima
dalam konteks kehidupan sehari-hari dalam teks berbentuk: narrative,
descriptive, dan news item.
C. Indikator Pencapaian Kompetensi
Mengetahui cara mendeskripsikan binatang dengan benar dan tepat.
Mengetahui cara menyampaikan deskripsi binatang dengan pasih/lancar.
H. Tujuan Pembelajaran
Siswa dapat mendeskripsikan binatang dengan benar dan tepat.
Dalam mendeskripsikan binatang, Siswa dapat mengungkap dengan cara
yang pasih/lancar.
I. Materi Pokok
5.Describing Animals
a. Example of describing animals:
b. Cue cards:
Give the right answer based on the cue cards in 30 seconds !
ELEPHANT
-I‟ve got a big grey
body, a long trunk, big
ears and two tusks.
-I live in grassland
Which aninimal am I ?
CAT
-I‟ve got a whiskers
and a long tail
-I‟ve got four legs
-I haven‟t got wings
-I eat fish
Which aninimal am I ?
-I live in Africa
-I‟m the king of the jungle
-I‟m very dangerous
-I eat meat|
-I‟ve got sharp teeth and big body
Which animal am I? (LION)
-I‟m orange and white
-I can swim
-I live in the sea
-I‟ve got four fins
-I haven‟t got legs or a tail
Which animal am I? (FISH)
GIRAFFE
-I live in grasslands
-I‟ve got a long neck.
-I eat leaves from the trees
F. Metode Pembelajaran/Teknik:
Cue cards Media
G. Strategi Pembelajaran
Kegiatan Langkah Pembelajaran Alokasi
Waktu
Awal
Menyapa siswa dengan mengucapkan salam dan
menanyakan kabar siswa dalam bahasa Inggris
Menyampaikan materi dan tujuan pembelajaran yang
ingin dicapai
Siswa diminta untuk mengingat hal-hal yang
berkenaan dengan materi, Kemudian
mendeskripsikannya.
Inti
Pertemuan Ke 5-6
Guru mengelompokkan siswa dalam bentuk pasangan
(work in pair)
Setiap pasangan mendapatkan 3 kartu dengan gambar
yang telah ditentukan.
Salah satu siswa dalam kelompok pasangan, diminta
untuk melihat gambar pada kartu, sedangkan siswa
lainnya akan menebak gambar “fast” dengan
menggunakan “yes or no” questions. E.g : “Is it an
animal?”
Setiap pasangan menyimpulkan pendapat mereka
mengenai Cue Cards yang telah berhasil ditebak.
Akhir
Guru bersama siswa menyimpulkan materi yang
sudah dipelajari
Melakukan refleksi terhadap kegiatan yang sudah
dipelajari dengan cara meminta salah seorang siswa
untuk mempraktekkan kembali materi yang telah
dipelajari, sedangkan siswa yang lainnya diminta
untuk memberi komentar.
Mengakhiri pembelajaran dengan mengucapkan
hamdalah
J. Sumber/Bahan/Alat
Buku, Internet
Kertas, Picture, Pensil Warna,Gunting, dll
K. Penilaian
1. Indikator, Teknik, Bentuk, dan Contoh.
No. Indikator Teknik Bentuk Contoh
1. Mendeskripsikan binatang Tes Lisan Mendeskripsikan Describe the cue
dengan tepat dan pasih. gambar cards in front of
class!
4. InstrumenPenilaian
Describe the cue cards using yes or no question with your partner. Then,
perform your description in front of the class!
5. PedomanPenilaian
e. Accuracy
Classification Score Criteria
Excellent 6 Pronunciation is only very slightly influenced by the mother-tongue. Two or three minor grammatical and lexical errors.
Very good 5 Pronunciation is slightly influenced by the mother-tongue. A few minor grammatical and lexical errors but most utterances are correct.
Good 4 Pronunciation is still moderately influenced by the mother-tongue but no serious phonological errors. A few grammatical and lexical errors but only one or two majors causing confusion.
Average 3 Pronunciation is influenced by the mother-tongue but only a few serious phonological errors. Several grammatical and lexical errors, some of which cause confusion.
Poor 2 Pronunciation is seriously influenced by mother-tongue with errors causing a breakdown in communication. Many ‘basic’ grammatical and lexical errors.
Very poor 1 Serious Pronunciation errors as well as many ‘basic’ grammatical and lexical errors. no evidence of having mastered of any language skill and areas practiced in the course.
f. Fluency
Classification Score Criteria
Excellent 6 Speak without too great an effort with a fairly wide
range of expression. Searches for words occasionally by
only one or two unnatural pauses.
Very Good 5 Has to make an effort at times to search for words.
Nevertheless, smooth delivery on the whole and only a
few unnatural pauses.
Good 4 Although he has to make an effort and search for words,
there are not too many unnatural pauses. Fairly smooth
delivery mostly. Occasionally fragmentary but succeeds
in conveying the general meaning. Fair range of
expression.
Average 3 Has to make an effort for much of time. Often has to
search for the desire meaning. Rather halting delivery.
Almost gives up making the effort at times limited.
Poor 2 Long pauses while he researches for the desired
meaning. Frequently fragmentary and halting delivery.
Almost give up making the effort at times. Limited
range of expression.
Very poor 1 Full of long and unnatural pauses. Very halting and
fragmentary delivery. At times gives up making the
effort. Very limited range of expression.
X Mean Score =
x 10
5) Calculating the mean score of the students‟ speaking test by using the
following formula:
=
Where: X : the mean score
∑x : T
N :
6) The result from the convert score put in this score classification:
Score Classification
9.6 – 10 Excellent
8.6 – 9.5 Very good
7.6 – 8.5 Good
6.6 – 7.5 Fairly good
5.6 – 6.5 Fair
3.6 – 5.5 Poor
0 – 3.5 Very poor
Makassar, Oktober 2017
Guru Mata Pelajaran Mahasiswi
Nur Andriani, S.Pd Eka Lisya Rosalinda
NBM. 1056259 Nim. 10535539113
STUDENTS’ MATERIAL IN SPEAKING ACTIVITY
Quessing the cue cards by using yes or no question with your partner. Than,
mention the description on the cue cards!
S-16 & S-19
LAUDIA CYNTIA BELLA
Beautifull
White skin
Sharp nose
Sweet smila
Thick eyebrows
Round eyes
Red lips
Cute
S-7, S-10 & S-13
ALIANDO SYARIF
handsome
he has white skin
nice smile
Thick eyebrows
tall
pointed nose
he has black hair
he has slanting eyes S-22 & S-29
ANDI ARSYIL
he has black hair
he has slanting eyes
he has white skin
he is tall
sharp nose
he is a nice man
handsome S-8 & S-5
SYAHRINI Indonesian actress
Singer
Beautiful gir
She has white skin
Sharp eyes
Round eyes
Oval face
Pretty
Talented
S-33 & S-30
BOBOHO
white skin
fat
flat nose
bald
slanting eyes
funny
short
greedy
S-4 & S-12
ROMA IRAMA
Indonesian actress
King of dangdut
Talented
S-15 & S-14
LION
-I live in Africa
-I‟m the king of the jungle
-I‟m very dangerous
-I eat meat|
-I‟ve got sharp teeth and big body
Which animal am I? (LION)
S-17 & S-9
GIRAFFE
-I live in grasslands
-I‟ve got a long neck.
-I eat leaves from the trees
Which aninimal am I ?
S-34 & S-3
FISH
-I‟m orange and white
-I can swim
-I live in the sea
-I‟ve got four fins
-I haven‟t got legs or a tail
Which animal am I? (FISH)
S-27 & S-18
ERASER
-Made from rubber
-Bendy
-Soft
-Small
S-32 & S-20
CHAIR
-Made of wood
-Brown
-Hard
-Smooth
S-21 & S-25
PENCIL
Made of wood
Red and black color
Hard
Smooth
S-11 & S-26
JACKIE CHAN
sharp nose
white skin
tall
handsome
strong
From hongkong
An actor in action/comedy movies
Funny people
Black hair
S-35 & S-28
BARAC OBAMA
-Black hair - handsome
-Sharp nose -tall
-Slanted eyes -funny
-Cute -thin
-Brown skin -thick lips
-Thick eyebrows -Genius
APPENDIX C
Calculating the Mean Score of the Students’ Speaking Ability in Pretest
No Code of
Students Pre Test
1. The mean score of students‟ speaking ability in Pretest
a. Fluency classification
Fluency Accuracy Final score
Row score Score Row score Score
1 S-1 2 3.33 1 1.67 2.50
2 S-2 2 3.33 3 5.00 4.17
3 S-3 1 1.67 3 5.00 3.33
4 S-4 3 5.00 3 5.00 5.00
5 S-5 2 3.33 3 5.00 4.17
6 S-6 3 5.00 4 6.67 5.83
7 S-7 3 5.00 3 5.00 5.00
8 S-8 2 3.33 3 5.00 4.17
9 S-9 3 5.00 2 3.33 4.17
10 S-10 2 3.33 3 5.00 4.17
11 S-11 3 5.00 4 6.67 5.83
12 S-12 1 1.67 3 5.00 3.33
13 S-13 3 5.00 2 3.33 4.17
14 S-14 2 3.33 2 3.33 3.33
15 S-15 1 1.67 2 3.33 2.50
16 S-16 1 1.67 3 5.00 3.33
17 S-17 2 3.33 2 3.33 3.33
18 S-18 2 3.33 2 3.33 3.33
19 S-19 2 3.33 2 3.33 3.33
20 S-20 2 3.33 3 5.00 4.17
21 S-21 2 3.33 3 5.00 4.17
22 S-22 2 3.33 2 3.33 3.33
23 S-23 2 3.33 1 1.67 2.50
24 S-24 2 3.33 2 3.33 3.33
25 S-25 2 3.33 3 5.00 4.17
26 S-26 4 6.67 4 6.67 6.67
27 S-27 2 3.33 3 5.00 4.17
28 S-28 2 3.33 2 3.33 3.33
29 S-29 2 3.33 2 3.33 3.33
30 S-30 2 3.33 3 5.00 4.17
31 S-31 2 3.33 2 3.33 3.33
32 S-32 3 5.00 3 5.00 5.00
33 S-33 2 3.33 2 3.33 3.33
34 S-34 2 3.33 2 3.33 3.33
35 S-35 2 3.33 2 3.33 3.33
Total 75.00
125.00
89.00
148.33
136.65
=
=
= 3.57
b. Accuracy classification
=
=
= 4.24
2. Speaking final score
=
=
= 3.90
No Code of
Students
Post Test
Fluency Accuracy Final score
Row score Score Row score Score
1 S-1 4 6.67 3 5.00 5.83
2 S-2 3 5.00 5 8.33 6.67
Calculating the Mean Score of the Students’ Speaking Ability in Posttest
1. The mean score of students‟ speaking ability in Posttest
a. Fluency classification
3 S-3 3 5.00 5 8.33 6.67
4 S-4 4 6.67 4 6.67 6.67
5 S-5 5 8.33 4 6.67 7.50
6 S-6 4 6.67 5 8.33 7.50
7 S-7 5 8.33 5 8.33 8.33
8 S-8 3 5.00 5 8.33 6.67
9 S-9 4 6.67 4 6.67 6.67
10 S-10 4 6.67 5 8.33 7.50
11 S-11 5 8.33 5 8.33 8.33
12 S-12 4 6.67 5 8.33 7.50
13 S-13 5 8.33 4 6.67 7.50
14 S-14 3 5.00 5 8.33 6.67
15 S-15 3 5.00 5 8.33 6.67
16 S-16 3 5.00 5 8.33 6.67
17 S-17 4 6.67 4 6.67 6.67
18 S-18 3 5.00 5 8.33 6.67
19 S-19 3 5.00 5 8.33 6.67
20 S-20 4 6.67 5 8.33 7.50
21 S-21 4 6.67 5 8.33 7.50
22 S-22 5 8.33 4 6.67 7.50
23 S-23 5 8.33 3 5.00 6.67
24 S-24 5 8.33 4 6.67 7.50
25 S-25 5 8.33 5 8.33 8.33
26 S-26 5 8.33 5 8.33 8.33
27 S-27 4 6.67 5 8.33 7.50
28 S-28 5 8.33 4 6.67 7.50
29 S-29 3 5.00 5 8.33 6.67
30 S-30 4 6.67 5 8.33 7.50
31 S-31 5 8.33 4 6.67 7.50
32 S-32 5 8.33 5 8.33 8.33
33 S-33 4 6.67 4 6.67 6.67
34 S-34 4 6.67 4 6.67 6.67
35 S-35 4 6.67 5 8.33 7.50
Total 143.00
238.33
160.00
266.67
252.53
=
=
= 6.81
b. Accuracy classification
=
=
= 7.62
2. Speaking final score
=
=
= 7.21
APPENDIX D
Frequency and Percentage in Students’ Speaking Ability
A. Frequency of the Students’ Fluency in Speaking
1. Pretest
a. Very Poor
F= 4. N= 35 P =
× 100%
P =
× 100% = 11.42%
b. Poor
F = 23. N = 35 P =
×100%
P =
×100% = 65.71%
c. Average
F = 7. N = 35 P =
×100%
P =
× 100% = 20%
d. Good
F = 1. N = 35 P =
×100%
P =
× 100% = 2.85%
2. Post Test
a. Average
F= 9. N= 35 P =
× 100%
P =
× 100% = 25.71%
b. Good
F = 14. N = 35 P =
×100%
P =
× 100% = 40%
c. Very Good
F = 12. N = 35 P =
×100%
P =
× 100% = 34.28%
B. Frequency of the Students’ Accuracy in Speaking
1. Pretest
a. Very Poor
F= 2. N= 35 P =
× 100%
P =
× 100% = 5.71%
b. Poor
F = 15. N = 35 P =
×100%
P =
×100% = 42.85%
c. Average
F = 15. N = 35 P =
×100%
P =
× 100% = 42.85%
d. Good
F = 3. N = 35 P =
×100%
P =
× 100% = 8.57%
2. Post Test
a. Average
F = 2. N = 35 P =
×100%
P =
×100% = 5.71%
b. Good
F = 11. N = 35 P =
×100%
P =
× 100% = 31.42%
c. Very Good
F = 22. N = 35 P =
×100%
P =
× 100% = 62.85%
APPENDIX E
Improvement on Students’ Speaking Ability in Terms of Fluency and
Accuracy
1. Improvement percentage in students‟ speaking fluency
P =
x 100%
=
x 100%
= 90.75%
2. Improvement percentage in students‟ speaking accuracy