User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010 Portal Soil and Subsoil Robert Jan van Leeuwen en Matthijs Poelmans
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
Portal Soil and Subsoil
Robert Jan van Leeuwen en Matthijs Poelmans
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
Three reasons
1. Present portals do not perform (Q1 2009, DINO)
2. The Key Register for the Subsurface demands a new portal (medio 2009, BRO)
3. The Geologische Dienst van Nederland/Geological Survey of the Netherlands needs a look of its own (medio 2010, GDNL)
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
What type of websites are covered by the Geologische Dienst NL?
1. A number of content websites (e.g. geosites)
2. A special purpose site (delfstoffenonline)
3. Two portals for data distribution (DINOLoket, NLOG)
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
Content websites
• provides general information regarding the geological survey or sites of geological interest
• user community: the public, those interested in the subsurface of the Netherlands,
• website without functionality
• specific look and feel
• (content)management by third party
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
Special purposewww.delfstoffenonline.nl
• issuing specific information (sand/gravels for building purposes)
• specifieke user community: extraction companies
• website with specific functionality: viewer on the GIS-database of the DINO-system
• specific look and feel
• contentmanagement by DINO-ICT
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
Two data portals
• the portals have specific content• the essential purpose is the distribution of a broad array of datatypes
• each portal its own data• datacentric
• user community: experts • each portal its own community
• look and feel• each portal its own
• both websites essentially the same functionality (view, download, order,…) on the DINO-database
• contentmanagement by DINO DM (portalmanager)
NLOG DINOLoket
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
1 Present portals do not perform
• technologically out of date
• technically not maintainable
• content not maintainable
• not userfriendly (any more)
• DINOLoket has a serious barrier (subscription)
NLOG DINOLoket
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
Data portals: present situation
DINO DINO
DINOLoket NLOG
A B
deepshallow
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
2 BRO demands a new portal minimal requirements (1)
• General• user friendly• proven, modern technology (september 2009: Flex)• maintainable• without barrier• datacentric• broad functionality• user community: experts
• Specific• distribution of all types of BRO-data (one stop shop)• new look and feel• new data• new users
“BROLoket”
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
2 BRO demands a new portal minimal requirements (2)
• New data• domain Soils• bijv. groundwater licences• (more types of) sample analysis• …
• New users• e.g. soil experts• municipalities• and most of all more users, more use
high demands performance & usability
fresh look and name
“BROLoket”
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
BROLoket: purpose situation
DINO BRO
BROLoket
A,B,C,…
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
… the other websites of Geologische Dienst NL
delfstoffenonline
E
GISdb
Geosites geologicalsurvey
DD
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
The many faces of the Geologische Dienst NL
A
DINO DINO
DINOLoket
B
DINO BRO
BROLoket
A,B,C,…
delfstoffenonline
E
GISdb
Geosites geologicalsurvey
DD
NLOG
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
… and a missing website
TT-GIP
DINO BRO
BROLoket
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
3 The Geologische Dienstaim: one face, many expressions
DINO BRO
BROLoket
A,B,C,…
Special purposes
E,..
Geologische Dienst
D
New technology
TT-GIP
GDNL
F
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
3 GDNL &NLOGbecomes a content website
DINO BRO
BROLoket
A,B,C,…
NLOG
F
Geologische Dienst
D
New technology
TT-GIP
GDNL
F
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
GDNL: transition
A B
D
Look & feel
Functionality
DINO BRO
A,B,C,…
E,..
DD,.. D
...
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
Input VROM and Alterra
• 20100630 Concept discussed with Joop Okx (Alterra) and Dirk van Barneveld (VROM)
• Alterra, i.e. the “STIBOKA” must have its place in the system to secure the relation between soil maping and the BRO blijft bestaan
• Consequence: replace the name GDNL by Portal Soil and Subsurface/Portaal Bodem en Ondergrond
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
Portal Soil and Subsurface
DINO BRO
Distribution
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
1 Functionality and interaction
DINO BRO
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
• May 2010 sessions with internal and external users to get input for the Rough Design (RD), with a.o..
• Fred Olie (Haskoning)• Janco van Gelderen (Bodem en Grondwater Prov. Utrecht)• Noortje Heijnen (IF Technologie) • Vera Lagendijk (Vitens)• Hermi Hagendijk (ATP)
• The RD contains basic principles, boundary conditions and overall functionality for BROLoket
• The RD is input for an interactionmodel (= what functionality is available and how is it stuctured)
• The RD is input for the interactiondesign of functionality (= how does it work, e.g. the viewer)
Rough design dataportal (1)
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
2 Graphic design
The RD is input for BROLoket’s graphic design
DINO BRO
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
3 Organisation
DINO BRO
Uitgifte
User Council DINO-DO 23 september 2010
• Interaction model and interaction design are translated into in Use Cases. Use cases describe all user operations and the response of the system. Examples:• what does an error message look like?• what checks performs the system regarding my input?• what happens when I click “return” ?
• Use Cases will be reviewed by users
Organisation dataportal
Related Documents
