-
Use of Standard Common Data Elements (CDEs) in CEDAR
Mark A. Musen, M.D., Ph.D.Kathryn Collins
Martin O’Connor, M.S.John Graybeal
Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics ResearchDepartment of
Medicine
Stanford University School of [email protected]
-
The CEDAR Approach to Metadata
-
The CEDAR Approach to Standards
• Operating on Big Data requires all kinds of standards
• We don’t want to be in the standards business ourselves
• We want to be able to accommodate the standards that come from
the biomedical community
• We need an adaptable infrastructure where standard
specifications are themselves editable
-
Some key features of CEDAR• All semantic components—template
elements,
templates, ontologies, and value sets—are managed as first-class
entities
• User interfaces and drop-down menus are not hardcoded, but are
generated on the fly from CEDAR’s semantic content
• All software components have well defined APIs, facilitating
reuse of software by a variety of clients
• CEDAR generates all metadata in JSON-LD, a widely adopted Web
standard that can be translated into other representations
7
-
CEDAR was designed to take advantage of ontology standards
• Standard templates derived from community-based minimal
information models
• Templates rendered as frames that can be instantiated with
standard values
• Template slots filled using standard ontologies and value
sets
THE NATIONAL CENTER FORBIOMEDICAL ONTOLOGY
-
But there are different kinds of metadata specifications!
• Templates describing classes of experiments—
• Ontologies describing potential values
• Metadata (CDEs) describing data types and value sets —
-
NCI uses “common data elements” as metadata for fields in
CRFs
-
CDEs are based on ISO/IEC 11179 model
13
-
Describing CDEs in CEDAR
Data Element model
represented as
CEDAR Template
Common Data Element Template
CDE Instance
represented as
CEDAR Metadata Instance
Access Route of Administration Text Code
-
16
-
Representing CDEs in CEDAR will allow authoring of CEDAR
templates that can
provide the basis for eCRFs
Case Report Form 3517797: New Primary Cancer
Template
-
What CDEs Will Bring CEDAR
• Template slots for experimental metadata …– Can still refer to
ontologies and value sets as the
source of values for data items– Will also be able to refer to
CDEs as the source of
values or datatype restrictions for data items
• CEDAR will be able to interoperate with both kinds of
standards
-
CEDAR Accommodates Many Kinds of Standards
• Templates for Describing Biomedical Experiments
• Ontologies for providing values• CDEs for providing values•
APIs for accessing software components
And CEDAR makes all these specifications editable!
-
The CEDAR Approach to Standards
• Operating on Big Data requires all kinds of standards
• We don’t want to be in the standards business ourselves
• We want to be able to accommodate the standards that come from
the biomedical community
• We need an adaptable infrastructure where standard
specifications are themselves editable
-
http://metadatacenter.org
Use of Standard Common Data Elements (CDEs) in CEDAR�The
CEDAR Approach to MetadataThe CEDAR Approach to StandardsSlide
Number 4Slide Number 5Slide Number 6Some key features of CEDARCEDAR
was designed to take advantage of ontology standardsSlide Number
9Slide Number 10But there are different kinds of metadata
specifications!NCI uses “common data elements” as metadata for
fields in CRFsCDEs are based on ISO/IEC 11179 modelSlide Number
14Describing CDEs in CEDARSlide Number 16Representing CDEs in CEDAR
will allow authoring of CEDAR templates that can provide the basis
for eCRFsWhat CDEs Will Bring CEDARCEDAR Accommodates Many Kinds of
StandardsThe CEDAR Approach to StandardsSlide Number 21