Use of High Spectral Resolution Infrared Sounders to Validate Reanalyses

Use of High Spectral Resolution Infrared Sounders to Validate

ReanalysesMitch Goldberg, Likun Wang

NOAA/NESDIS/STARSatellite Meteorology and

Climatology Division

1

Motivation• Many studies comparing AIRS, IASI and aircraft interferometer have

demonstrated the accuracy and stability of AIRS and IASI.

• Finally we have a very precise, accurate reference dataset to validate other datasets, such as radiosondes, model analyses, reanalyses, etc.

• Unlike GPS RO, the thermal infrared radiances are influenced by key essential climate variables:– CO2, CH4, O3, CO, Clouds, Aerosols, Temperature, Moisture.

• CLARREO mission is design to meet this objective, with onboard SI traceability.

• Climate Reanalyses are gaining recognition for providing historical climate information but each are different, why??

3

Wide spread in Projections

4

Need to improve model projections. With benchmark – reference satellite observations, we can insist that the models agree with the satellite observations

AIRS Sensitivity to Atmospheric Change

Approach

• Simulate AIRS IR radiances from Reanalyses and compare with observed AIRS.

• Limiting factors:– How good is AIRS?– How good is the radiative transfer model?

6

01/29/2010 Task140 Brief 7

Double Difference versus SNOs

1) Indirect vs. Direct comparison

2) Warm scenes vs. cold scenes

Four channels

SNOs

Polar Regions

01/29/2010 Task140 Brief 8

Results

GOES-AIRSGOES-IASI

SNO NorthSNO South

Double Difference

6.5µm

10.7µm

12.0µm

13.3µm

IASI-AIRS

Wang et al. 2010, manuscript for GRL

Zero line

9

Statistical results

GOES-11 Ch3

GOES-11 Ch4

GOES-11 Ch5 GOES-12 Ch6

Central Wavelength (µm) 6.7 10.7 12.0 13.3

Double Differences

Sample number 694 688 691 626

Mean (K) -0.0707 -0.0262 -0.041 -0.0751

95% confidence level (K)

0.0052 0.0116 0.0135 0.0124

SNOs Sample number 228 * 228 228 228

Mean (K) -0.011 -0.0624 -0.010 -0.0124

95% confidence level (K)

0.0091 0.0300 0.0295 0.0211

10

11

12

13

14

Temperature channel 1.5 mb peak

15

Temerature channel 40 mb peak

16

Temperature channel 300 mb peak

17

Water vapor channel 300 mb peak

Increasing negative means increase in water vapor

DR = f( DT, DQ)

ERA-Interim versus ECMWFTPW above 500hpa

JRA versus ECMWFTPW above 500hpa

MERRA versus ECMWFTPW above 500hpa

Comparison with TWP ARM Site - Night time – September 2002-2005 N=22

Summary

Datasets have been generated for 5 years data from January 2003:

Summary/Recommendations• AIRS and IASI are reference quality instruments which

can be used to validate climate reanalyses and climate projections.

• Need to continue to improve radiative transfer models via better laboratory spectroscopy and ground truth data (e.g. GRUAN)

• Absolute observations and radiative transfer will allow measurements to be used as anchor points and will allow focus on improving model physics.

23

ERA Interim Reanalysis - ECMWF Weather Analysis – September 2004

ERA Interim Reanalysis - ECMWF Weather Analysis Sept. 2007

ECMWF 2003 – 2005 can be used to validate reanalyses

ERAIM - JRA25 ECMWF - JRA25

JRA25 vs ECMWF and ERA Interim (above 500 mb)