- Yes No Did not participate in monitoring round Unknown or not applicable United States aggregate data IHP + DP Average Legend 2016 IHP+ MONITORING ROUND COMMITMENT TO ESTABLISH STRONG HEALTH SECTOR STRATEGIES WHICH ARE JOINTLY ASSESSED, AND STRENGTHEN ACCOUNTABILITY PARTNERS SUPPORT A SINGLE NATIONAL HEALTH STRATEGY COMMITMENT TO IMPROVE THE FINANCING, PREDICTABILITY AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF THE HEALTH SECTOR HEALTH DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION IS MORE PREDICTABLE DP participates in joint sector or sub-sector assessments of strategic plan (JANS) COMMITMENT TO CREATE AN ENABLING ENVIRONMENT FOR CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS AND PRIVATE SECTOR PARTICIPATION IN THE HEALTH SECTOR CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS ENGAGEMENT HEALTH AID IS ON BUDGET HOW TO READ THE PERFORMANCE PROFILE All data presented on this visual aid are self-reported by the development partner (DP), or provided by the ministry of health (MoH), the civil society organizations (CSOs) and private sector (PS) representatives in the 14 countries for which the DP reported (see list of countries at the back). All data provided by government, CSOs and PS have in principle been validated by MoH. Where possible, trends in performance are documented over the last 2 monitoring rounds (2014 and 2016). For complementary information such as the Country 2016 monitoring report please visit www.internationalhealthpartnership.net . DP supports private sector organisations (Support can include financing or technical support) DP supports CSOs. (Support can include consultation, financing, training and/or technical support) DP supports regional technical cooperation, e.g. communities of practice; south-south cooperation; triangular cooperation: DP uses national procurement and supply systems DP funds use national expenditure procedures. Note: data provided only for countries with CPIA 3.5 or higher. DP funds reported on budget Predictability of funds for future - DP has communicated forward looking expenditure for 3 years ahead to government DP funds disbursed to the government according to agreed timelines. DP participates in mutual accountability processes DP uses only national health sector indicators to monitor support MUTUAL ACCOUNTABILITY IS STRENGTHENED COMMITMENT TO ESTABLISH, STRENGTHEN AND USE COUNTRY SYSTEMS PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT (PFM) SYSTEMS ARE STRENGTHENED AND USED TECHNICAL SUPPORT IS COORDINATED AND SOUTH-SOUTH COOPERATION SUPPORTS LEARNING PROCUREMENT AND SUPPLY SYSTEMS ARE STRENGTHENED AND USED PRIVATE SECTOR ENGAGEMENT The 8 Effective Development Cooperation (EDC) practices in health are captured in 4 commitments. The first three commitments present the performance of the DPs against 6 EDC practices. The fourth commitment regards DP support to civil society and private sector. Development partner (DP) visual aid: UNITED STATES (INCLUDING CDC, USAID AND PEPFAR) 41% IHP+ DP average 29% United States 2014 2016 0.0 25% 100% 50% 75% 90% TARGET 53% 56% 43% 0% 2014 2016 0.0 25% 100% 50% 75% 90% TARGET 53% 63% 49% 72% 2014 2016 0.0 25% 100% 50% 75% 90% TARGET 37% 60% 19% 20% 2014 2016 0.0 25% 100% 50% 75% 90% TARGET 71% 53% 86% 98% 2014 2016 0.0 25% 100% 50% 75% 90% TARGET 73% 77% 60% 64% 46% IHP+ DP average 33% United States 75% 80% IHP+ DP average United States 82% IHP+ DP average 79% United States 0 20 40 60 80 100% Target 79% 74% 0 20 40 60 80 100% Target 79% 48% 0 20 40 60 80 100% Target 79% 73% 0 20 40 60 80 100% Target 79% 80%