U.S Regulatory Process for Uranium Production Facility Licensing and Operation Daniel M. Gillen
Jan 16, 2016
U.S Regulatory Process for Uranium Production Facility Licensing and Operation
Daniel M. Gillen
What’s in this Session
What’s in this Session
• Discussion of what comprises the initial licensing and operational phases of the facility lifecycle– Phase 1: License application and issuance
process– Phase 2: Regulator/Licensee interactions
during operations
• Phase 3: Closure/License Termination will be discussed in a separate presentation
Licensing Process PhasesLicensing Process Phases
Application/Licensing
Operations
Decommissioning Long Term Care
Project ManagerTechnical Reviewers(Geologist, Civil Engineer, Health Physicist, Hydrologist)Environmental reviewers
1-2 yearsDecades, with renewalEvery 10 years
Project ManagerTechnical ReviewersEnvironmental ReviewersInspectors
Applicant Licensee Licensee/DOE
Project ManagerTechnical ReviewersEnvironmental ReviewersInspectors
Up to several yearsFor decom; Long-term care is open ended
Phase I: ApplicationPhase I: Application
Yes
Yes
• Applicant selects best site considering:– Distance from mines– Waste storage (groundwater, below grade cells, surface
water hydrology)– Transportation routes
• Pre-application area and site characterization– Use of adjacent lands and waters– Population distribution– Historic, scenic, and cultural resources– Meteorology– Geology/seismology– Hydrology (surface and groundwater)– Ecology– Background radiological characteristics
Site Selection, Characterization
License Application general content– Proposed activities– Site Characteristics– Mill process and equipment and Waste management system– Operations (Organization, Security, Radiation Safety)– Decommissioning Plans– Financial Assurance– Accident Analysis
Environmental Report general content– Description of the Proposed Action– Description of the Affected Environment– Identification of Adverse Impacts that cannot be avoided– Alternatives to the Proposed Action
Application and EnvironmentalReport submittal
Technical and Environmental Review
Technical and Environmental Review
• Goal is protection of public health and safety and environment
• A review team is assigned to the project
• Acceptance Review first• Application review schedule set• Reviews use applicable
standard review plans
Technical Review TeamTechnical Review Team
• The team is led by the Project Manager
• Uranium recovery application review teams– Health Physicists– Hydro-geologists– Geotechnical Engineers– Surface water hydrology and
erosion experts– Financial Specialists
Application GuidanceApplication Guidance
• Standard Format and Content Guides for Applicants (What needs to be submitted)
• Standard Review Plans for review staff– Ensure reviews are of consistent quality and
uniformity– What is to be reviewed– Basis for the review– How the review is to be accomplished– What the staff will find acceptable– Conclusions that need to be made
Technical Review StepsTechnical Review Steps
Team beginstechnicalreview
RAI’sissued
Revisions toapplicationsubmitted Remaining
open issuesaddressed inmeetings
RAI=Request for Additional Information
SER=Safety Evaluation Report
Review complete;Conclusions inSER
Environmental ReviewEnvironmental Review
Safety and environmental reviews conducted in parallel
Law requires Federal agencies to consider the environmental impacts of their actions
Initiated by application for a new license, or a change to an existing license
Focus is on the environmental impacts of the proposed action
Financial Assurance
• Licensees must provide:– Certification of
financial assurance to guarantee that funds will be available for decommissioning
– Breakdown of estimated costs for site closure
– Commitments for annual update and updates for any planned expansions or operational changes
Public InvolvementPublic Involvement
NRC Public WebsiteFreedom of Information Act requestsSpecific hearing opportunities provided:
Individuals, citizen groups, private businesses, and governmental bodies have received hearing status
Input in the environmental evaluation process (scoping and comment)
Meetings with licensees/applicants open to public
License IssuanceLicense Issuance
• If the finding is that the application/proposal for a uranium recovery facility complies with laws and regulations:– Issue letter to applicant– Attach Safety Evaluation Report, reference to
the Environmental Assessment document (with FONSI), and a License with certain license conditions as appropriate
License DenialLicense Denial
If the finding is that an application does not comply with the laws and regulations:– Issue a notice of proposed denial or a notice
of denial of the application– Inform the applicant in writing of:
The nature of any deficiencies or the reason for the proposed denial or the denial, and
The right of the applicant to demand a hearing
Key Areas Addressed in Licenses (License Conditions)
Key Areas Addressed in Licenses (License Conditions)
• Authorized place of use and production limitations• Tie to commitments in Application• Financial Assurance • SOP development• Radiation Program: Training, Bioassay, HP surveys,
ALARA, Inspections, Release of equipment and materials
• Effluent and Environmental Monitoring• Waste Management• Record Keeping and Reporting
Phase II: OperationsPhase II: Operations
Facility Operation
• During facility operation, the licensee:– Meets all license conditions– Gathers environmental and
effluent monitoring data– Monitors workers– Keeps required records– Reports to Regulator as
required by regulations and license
– Requests amendment and renewal of license as necessary
Environmental MonitoringEnvironmental Monitoring
• Types– Radon– air particulates– biota– soils– direct radiation– Water
• Locations• Frequency of sampling• Action levels and corrective
action
ALARA PrincipleALARA Principle
• ALARA = As Low As (is) Reasonably Achievable
• Licensees must use procedures and engineering controls to achieve occupational doses and doses to members of the public that are ALARA.
Recordkeeping and Reporting
Recordkeeping and Reporting
Records need to be kept related to:– Implementation of the radiation protection program– Radiation surveys and instrument calibration– Occupational doses and planned special exposures– Doses to members of the public– Waste disposal– Receipt and transfer of source or byproduct material – Spills– As built drawings– Environmental monitoring (biota, air, groundwater,
surface water)
Recordkeeping and Reporting(Continued)
Recordkeeping and Reporting(Continued)
Reports need to be sent to Regulator on:– Theft or loss of material– Incidents where doses are exceeded– Exposures, radiation levels, and
concentrations of radioactive material exceeding the constraints or limits
– Unplanned contamination events– Results of effluent monitoring
Inspection and Enforcement
• Regulator inspectors must pass qualification• Inspection Manual Chapter 2801 addresses how uranium mill
inspected• Frequency generally 1/yr, but depends on operating history• May be announced or unannounced• Team: Lead inspector (HP); hydro-geologist, geotechnical engineer
as needed• Inspect records, interview staff, perform confirmatory surveys,
observe activities• Enforcement action may follow: NOV’s, Civil Penalties, Orders
Licensing ActionsLicensing Actions
• License Amendments– Licensee requests for changes to existing licensed
activities and conditions require the issuance of license amendments
• License Renewals– Currently, uranium recovery facilities are required to
renew every 10 years
• Licenses may be revoked, suspended, or modified by Regulator
Summary
Licensing can be looked at as having 3 main phases; Application, Operation, Closure
Application process includes:– application preparation and submittal– hearing process opportunities– technical and environmental review– public involvement– license issuance or denial
Operational actions include monitoring, radiation safety, license amendments and renewal, recordkeeping and reporting, and inspection and enforcement
Questions?