US participation in Heavy Ion Physics with Compact Muon Solenoid at LHC M. Ballintijn,K Barish,R Betts, BE Bonner, W.Busza, D.Cebra, G.Eppley, E.Garcia, F.Geurts, C.Halliwell, D.Hofman, P.Kulinich, W.Llope, M.Murray, G. van Nieuwenhuizen, E.Norbeck, R.Nouicer, Y.Onel, C.Roland, G.Roland, R.Seto, G.S.F.Stephans, B. Wyslouch, P.Yepes MIT, Rice, TAMU, UC Davis, UC Riverside, UI Chicago, U Iowa CMS HI workshop was held at MIT February 2002
28
Embed
US participation in Heavy Ion Physics with Compact Muon Solenoid at LHC M. Ballintijn,K Barish,R Betts, BE Bonner, W.Busza, D.Cebra, G.Eppley, E.Garcia,
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
US participation in Heavy Ion Physics with Compact Muon Solenoid at LHC
M. Ballintijn,K Barish,R Betts, BE Bonner, W.Busza, D.Cebra, G.Eppley, E.Garcia, F.Geurts, C.Halliwell, D.Hofman, P.Kulinich, W.Llope, M.Murray, G. van Nieuwenhuizen, E.Norbeck, R.Nouicer, Y.Onel, C.Roland, G.Roland,
• Find jets using calorimetry• Study charged particle momenta inside of a jet using the tracker• For this study use 4-5 outer layers of the tracker (use
conservative resolution obtained in pp studies: AA plausible with low occupancy in outer layers)
Particles in jet
Background
Field OFFField OFF Field ONField ON
Field OFFField OFFField ONField ON
Global observables e.g. Et
Our proposal to DoE/Nuclear
• Extend the physics reach of the US heavy ion community beyond RHIC’s energy scale
• Concentrate US physics effort on the study of phenomena most likely to be affected by the energy increase, the “hard probes”:– Quarkonia and heavy quark production– Jet production, jet-jet, jet-gamma and jet-Z0
correlations
• Provide US/RHIC expertise and tools to study high pt processes in AA collisions at the LHC
• Use detector designed for high pt physics: CMS
• LHC starts in mid-2007 with pp, AA to follow in 2008(?): Be ready with strong group in 2008
Our proposal to DoE/NuclearSpecific plans of the existing groups
• Physics studies, software development• High Level Trigger code development +
request to fund 2/8 slices of Event Filter Farm (Rice, MIT, UC Davis, UCR)
• Zero degree calorimeter (U Iowa, UIC, TAMU)
• Total ~ 5 M$ from DoE/Nuclear• review took place 2&3 of April @ DoE, no final
report yet. Closeout conclusion: “continue studies, come back later”
• competing with ALICE and ATLAS(!)
Centrality: Participants vs. Spectators
“Spectators”
Zero-degreeCalorimeter
“Spectators”
Many things scale with Npart:• Transverse Energy• Particle Multiplicity• Particle Spectra
“Participants”
Only ZDCs measure Npart
specpart NAN
Detectors at 90o
The collision geometry (i.e. the impact parameter) determines the number of nucleons that participate in the collision
Beam pipe splits 140m from IR.
INNER WALL
Z-AXIS
ZDC LOCATION
BEAM
BEAMPAIR OF PANTS(POP)
ALIGNMENT PINS
Zero Degree Calorimetry for CMS
RHIC ZDCs work very well
High Level Trigger (HLT)
• All event data available:– Fine data for
Calorimetry and Muon Detectors
– Tracker
• Refine triggered object
• Allows to go lower in pT
• Processing time O(s)• Filtering Farms of
commodity processors (Linux)
• L1 in AA has larger backgrounds than in pp due to underlying event.
• Efficiency trigger requires more careful analysis. HLT can do a better job than L1.
• HLT to play a greater role in AA
AA Event Size & Data Flow
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
pp OO ArAr SnSn PbPb
Eve
nt S
ize
(Kby
tes)
Pixel Si TrackerECAL HCALMuon
Event Size Detector # Channels(1000)
Pixel 45,000
Si Tracker 12,000
ECAL 230HCAL 14
Muon Det. 400
Total 57,644
Data Flow and Rates
L1
HLT
HLT better
trigger job
CPU Estimate of HI Online Tracking
June 16, 2000 First STAR event
tracked on line
STAR CMS ScalingdN/dy 600 3000 5.0Acceptance, ||< 1.5 2.5 1.7Max. Number Layers 45 13 0.3Clustering 1 2 2.0Clustering Type 1 2 2.0All Factors 9.6
STAR CMSMIP s/event 386 3706MIP s/ CPU 460 13800Event/CPU/s 1.2 3.7Max Input L3/HLT (Hz) 100 7400Minimum Number CPUs 84 1987
Moore’s Law: double/18 months
for ~8 years
• Use STAR (Rice) experience
• Scale linearly with # clusters from STAR AuAu to CMS PbPb
• Assume Moore’s Law
Near term plan
• Work together with heavy ion group in CMS on expanding the physics scope of the heavy ion program
• Develop good physics case for tracking in CMS, at HLT level and in offline analysis
• Develop and possibly prototype Zero degree calorimeter.
• Fight for funding from DoE, expand collaboration
Summary
• CMS has a potential to be an excellent detector for heavy ion physics
• RHIC results will really determine the scope of interesting physics, the US community will have direct access to the RHIC experience
• HI physicists could provide useful expertise, manpower and source of funding
Z0 production
• Z0- can be reconstructed with high efficiency
• A probe to study nuclear shadowing and parton energy loss
• Z0 also proposed as reference to production.– Nuclear effects may
depend on mass MZ>M
– Different production mechanisms:
• Z0: antiquark-quark, quark-gluon and antiquark-gluon.
: gluon-gluon.
Open b: high mass +- : medium modification, energy loss for b-quarks