Top Banner
US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility Rich Baker Deputy Director US ATLAS Computing Facilities October 26, 2000
18

US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility Rich Baker Deputy Director US ATLAS Computing Facilities October 26, 2000.

Jan 18, 2018

Download

Documents

10/26/00US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility - Rich Baker
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility Rich Baker Deputy Director US ATLAS Computing Facilities October 26, 2000.

US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility

Rich BakerDeputy Director

US ATLAS Computing FacilitiesOctober 26, 2000

Page 2: US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility Rich Baker Deputy Director US ATLAS Computing Facilities October 26, 2000.

10/26/00 US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility - Rich Baker

Existing Facility

Page 3: US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility Rich Baker Deputy Director US ATLAS Computing Facilities October 26, 2000.

10/26/00 US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility - Rich Baker

E450(NFS Server)

Dual Intel

Dual Intel

USATLASSwitch

SANHub

BackupServer

HPSSArchiveServer

Ÿ XXX.USATLAS.BNL.GOVŸ E450 front line with SSHŸ Objectivity Lock Server

200 GBytesRAID Disk

US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility

62 Intel/LinuxDual 700/450 MHz256/512 MBytes

9/18 GBytes100 Mbit Ethernet(3,200 SPECint95)

9840TapesAFS

Servers

AFS

~10 GBytesRAID DiskUS ATLAS

AFS

Ÿ LSFŸ AFSŸ ObjectivityŸ Gnu etc.

US ATLAS Equipment

RCF Infrastructure

~50 GBytesJBOD Disk

Intel/LinuxWeb Server

August 2000 Configuration

128 MBytes18 GBytes

.

.

.

RCFLAN

Page 4: US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility Rich Baker Deputy Director US ATLAS Computing Facilities October 26, 2000.

10/26/00 US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility - Rich Baker

Full Scale Facility (1)• Based on NCB Review Numbers

– Focus on Analysis (200k of 209k SI95)– Probably Insufficient for Simulation

• CPU: 209,000 SpecInt95– Commodity Pentium/Linux– Estimated 640 Dual Processor Nodes

• Online Storage: 365 TB Disk– High Performance Storage Area Network– Baseline: Fibre Channel Raid Array

Page 5: US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility Rich Baker Deputy Director US ATLAS Computing Facilities October 26, 2000.

10/26/00 US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility - Rich Baker

Full Scale Facility (2)

• Tertiary Storage: 2 PB Tape Library– Baseline: HPSS, STK Media & Tape Drives– 75% Event Summary Data– 25% Simulation, Analysis Objects, Local Data– “Raw” I/O Rate: 400 MB/second, 12.5 PB/year– Exploit Use Patterns to Maximize Efficiency

• Random Access to AOD - Always on Disk• Managed Access to ESD - Grid SW? Custom SW?

Page 6: US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility Rich Baker Deputy Director US ATLAS Computing Facilities October 26, 2000.

10/26/00 US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility - Rich Baker

Timeline Overview• Prototype – FY ‘01 & FY ‘02

– Initial Development & Test, 1% to 2% scale– Establish Facility Independent from RCF– Lessons Learned from RCF Experience

• System Tests – FY ‘03 & FY ‘04– Large Scale System Tests, 5% to 10% scale– Support Growing Tier 2 Network

• Operation – FY ‘05, FY ‘06 & beyond– Full Scale System Operation, 20% (‘05) to 100% (‘06)

Page 7: US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility Rich Baker Deputy Director US ATLAS Computing Facilities October 26, 2000.

10/26/00 US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility - Rich Baker

Tier 1 Facility Capacity

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Year

Perc

enta

ge C

ompl

ete

Page 8: US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility Rich Baker Deputy Director US ATLAS Computing Facilities October 26, 2000.

10/26/00 US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility - Rich Baker

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Tier 1 Facility Staffing

Operations

Performance Monitoring

Grid & WAN

HSM

System Administration

Planning & Management

Page 9: US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility Rich Baker Deputy Director US ATLAS Computing Facilities October 26, 2000.

10/26/00 US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility - Rich Baker

Estimation Methods - Hardware (1)

• Use Recent RCF Purchases as Cost Baseline• Moore’s Law Scaling for Commodity

Components (CPU, Disk, Tape)• STK Tape Drives: Constant Cost per Drive,

Double I/O Capacity Every 2 Years• Similar Constant Cost Projections for High

Performance Data Mover Nodes– $40K per HPSS Mover Node– $30K per SAN Control Node

Page 10: US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility Rich Baker Deputy Director US ATLAS Computing Facilities October 26, 2000.

10/26/00 US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility - Rich Baker

Estimation Methods - Hardware (2)

• Local Area Network: 8% of Disk+CPU Cost plus $20K per HPSS Mover

• Firewall/WAN Hardware: 25% of LAN Cost• Interactive Nodes

– 2 Linux Nodes Purchased per Year– Maintain One Sun/Solaris Node

• “General Purpose” Nodes– 21 Currently for RCF - Estimate 25 for ATLAS

Page 11: US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility Rich Baker Deputy Director US ATLAS Computing Facilities October 26, 2000.

10/26/00 US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility - Rich Baker

• Share Site License Costs with RCF– HPSS: 50% of $200K by 2005– LSF: 50% of $65K Starting 2002

• Veritas: $5K per SAN Control Node– Or Other SW Choice

• Most Other SW License Costs Can Only be Estimated - Total $97K in 2005– Good Estimate Based on Actual RCF Costs to

Support Operational Facility & Development

Estimation Methods - Software

Page 12: US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility Rich Baker Deputy Director US ATLAS Computing Facilities October 26, 2000.

10/26/00 US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility - Rich Baker

Tier 1 Budget Numbers (k$)

• HPSS License Double Counted

Personnel Material Total2001 711$ 675$ 1,386$ 2002 1,151$ 569$ 1,720$ 2003 1,538$ 1,029$ 2,567$ 2004 2,173$ 1,215$ 3,388$ 2005 3,537$ 1,741$ 5,278$ 2006 3,450$ 5,103$ 8,553$

Total 12,559$ 10,333$ 22,892$

Page 13: US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility Rich Baker Deputy Director US ATLAS Computing Facilities October 26, 2000.

10/26/00 US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility - Rich Baker

$-$1,000$2,000$3,000$4,000$5,000$6,000$7,000$8,000$9,000

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Tier 1 Budget Overview (k$)

Material

Personnel

Page 14: US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility Rich Baker Deputy Director US ATLAS Computing Facilities October 26, 2000.

10/26/00 US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility - Rich Baker

Tier 1 Material Numbers (k$)CPU Disk HPSS SW LAN/FW Travel Staff Misc HW Other

2001 -$ 279$ 131$ 85$ 46$ 39$ 21$ 20$ 12$ 2002 52$ 147$ 85$ 120$ 20$ 66$ 18$ 11$ 12$ 2003 173$ 307$ 108$ 120$ 44$ 94$ 33$ 48$ 14$ 2004 234$ 311$ 201$ 142$ 51$ 129$ 49$ 15$ 17$ 2005 242$ 371$ 516$ 142$ 101$ 165$ 72$ 15$ 22$ 2006 1,197$ 1,988$ 964$ 142$ 284$ 165$ 32$ 18$ 121

Total 1,898$ 3,403$ 2,005$ 753$ 546$ 657$ 226$ 128$ 197$

• HPSS License Included in HPSS Column• Volume Manager SW (Veritas) Included in Disk Column• “Other” Includes Power, Videoconference, Supplies

Page 15: US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility Rich Baker Deputy Director US ATLAS Computing Facilities October 26, 2000.

10/26/00 US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility - Rich Baker

$-

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

$5,000

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Tier 1 Material Costs (k$)

Other

Misc HW

Staff

Travel

LAN

SW

HPSS

Disk

CPU

Page 16: US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility Rich Baker Deputy Director US ATLAS Computing Facilities October 26, 2000.

10/26/00 US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility - Rich Baker

Tier 1 Facility Beyond 2006• Staffing: Constant at 25.5 FTE• Major HW Components

– Constant $ at 33% of 2006 Full Facility Cost– Allows for Continual Upgrade

• All Other Costs Level at 2005/2006 LevelsCPU Disk HPSS SW LAN Travel Staff Misc HW Other

494$ 820$ 456$ 142$ 117$ 165$ 50$ 20$ 50$

Material Personnel Total2,315$ 3,531$ 5,846$

Page 17: US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility Rich Baker Deputy Director US ATLAS Computing Facilities October 26, 2000.

10/26/00 US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility - Rich Baker

Comments• Scaleable Design - Recent 2.5X Expansion• Very Late Bulk Procurement

– Working System Earlier - Minimize Design Risk– Maximize Moore’s Law Advantage– Retain Flexibility as Long as Possible

• Leverage RCF Knowledge– Lessons Learned– Improved Estimation

Page 18: US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility Rich Baker Deputy Director US ATLAS Computing Facilities October 26, 2000.

10/26/00 US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility - Rich Baker

Summary• Facility Already Running• Near Term Prototype Planning in Progress• Budget Exceeds Agency Guideline by 33%

– Despite Recent 2.5X Scale Expansion!• Estimates Are Realistic

– Detailed Cost Basis From Recent Purchases– Moore’s Law Uncertainty

• Build to Cost Contingency Feasible– As Long as Tier 2 Facilities Are Funded