U.S. Army Logistics Innovation Agency https://lia.army.mil UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Acquisition Manager’s Guide to CLOE/CBM+ (AMG2CC) And Dashboard 25 February 2015 AMG2CC Conference
Jan 15, 2016
U.S. Army Logistics Innovation Agencyhttps://lia.army.mil
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
Acquisition Manager’s Guide to CLOE/CBM+
(AMG2CC)And
Dashboard
25 February 2015
AMG2CC Conference
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
2
Agenda
Background & Staffing Process Staffing Comments, Feedback and Observations AMG2CC Overview Dashboard Overview and Demonstration DASA-APL Path Forward Wrap-Up
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
3
BACKGROUND
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
AMG2CC Purpose and Approach
4AMG2CC and Dashboard Facilitate Measurement Of Implementation ProgressAMG2CC and Dashboard Facilitate Measurement Of Implementation Progress
Checklist-driven dashboard tool
The purpose of AMG2CC is to assist Platform-Level PMs to be interoperable with the Logistics Enterprise through the CLOE and to Achieve CBM+ Functionality Provide “how to” guidance to PMs for selecting and implementing CLOE/CBM+ capabilities Support Self–Assessment of CLOE/CBM+ progress via an accompanying dashboard tool
“How to” guidance for implementing CLOE/CBM+
Implementation progress reported at system acquisition reviews
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
5
AMG2CC Staffing & Trial-Use Period
2015
PM-HBCT
CECOM LRC & PM
ASA(ALT) Vector Check
PM-STRYKER,
JLTV, AMPVPM EE&SS
PM APACHE
Log
TACOM ILSC
2014
AMG2CCAMG2CC AMG2CCRev 1
AMG2CCRev 1
DASA APLGuidance
Memo
ConferenceCoordination
Conference
2013
• Penn State ARL• NAVSEA• USMC
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
Review - Objectives AMG2CC
How-to, Not A Strategy or Business Case Document
~40 Pages In Main Body, Rest In Appendices
Dashboard Support PM Self-assessment Of CBM+ Topic areas Described In AMG2CC
Staff AMG2CC through Army CLOE/CBM+ stakeholders LIA Conducted Preliminary Staffing With Support From ATEC and The Army Materiel
Command Life-Cycle Management Commands at TACOM, AMCOM and CECOM
ODASA(APL) Promoted staffing Through PEOs/PMs For Trial Use Period
Wrap-Up Conference & Workshop Provide Update to Stakeholders on Staffing Process
Provide Penn State ARL, NAVSEA and USMC Perspectives on RCM and CBM+
Provide ODASA (APL) Path Forward for AMG2CC and Dashboards
6
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
7
Update Selection of Lead Organization for Army CBM+ Store & Forward (SaF)
Implementation Lead Organization: PEO EIS / PD-AMIS; Supporting Organizations: CASCOM, HQ AMC,
G-4/LIA, TACOM/AMCOM/CECOM LCMCs, CERDEC
Recent CBM+ Activities AMC CBM+ 5 Year Plan CASCOM CBM+ CONOPS CBM+ SaF Problem Statement CBM+ SaF Course of Action Analysis and Recommendations
Continuing Efforts Army Integrated Logistics Architecture (AILA) CERDEC CBM+ Communication Systems Architecture (CCSA) Common CBM+ Architecture (CCA)
Governance Army CBM+ Executive Steering Committee (ACSC) – In addition to AMC G-3/4; G-44(M) and
CASCOM Chief of Ordnance added as Co-Chairs HQDA Business Process Council and Army Business Council
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
8
Comment Summary, Feedback & Observations
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
9
Current Status: Comments To-Date# Organization # Comments
1 ASA(ALT) ASA(ALT), Director of Policy & Staff 28
2
LIA (CLOE)
CLOE 26
3 AILA (Govt & contractor teams) 30
PNNL 114
5 HQ AMCHQ, AMC CBM+ Systems Engineering IPT 31
6 ATEC IPS Evaluator, Mounted Systems 57 PEO Soldier 298
PM
PM-ABCT (VHMS) (CPC) 29
9 PM-GCV ILS 8
PM-ABCT Govt 1810
11 JNN 712 JLTV 6
13 CERDEC CERDEC CBM+ 25
14 UNIVERSITY PSU ARL 5
TOTAL COMMENTS 258
Twelve Organizations
Fourteen Reviewing
Teams
258 Comments
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
10
Feedback1. Positives
a) All Stakeholders Liked The Concept Of The Dashboard.
b) No Stakeholder Disagreed With The Use Of The Dashboard Compliance Gauge In The SQC.
2. Negativesa) None; The 262 Written Comments Received Were All Constructive
Criticisms.
3. Principal Change Recommendationsa) Stakeholders Suggested Scoring Criteria Changes for Dashboard
Categories For Platform Software And Platform COMM
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
11
Observations3. Surprises
a) Most PM Log Divisions Are Not Familiar With DODAF - They Have To Search To Find DODAF Expertise (PD-MBTS /VHMS Is The Exception).
b) Most PMs We Talked To Do Not Implement RCM. They Do Implement Reliability Programs.
4. Principal Improvement Suggestionsa) Incorporate Dashboard Scoring Criteria In The Body Of The AMG2CC.
b) Have A CLOE-CBM+ Acquisition SOW Template In The AMC2CC for New Programs.
c) Need Tighter Synchronization Between CAPDEV and MATDEV WRT Army RCM Policy
12
AMG2CC Discussion
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
13
AMG2CC Topics Introduction, Scope CBM+ Concepts and Platform Examples
Tactical Wheeled Vehicles (MRAP & FMTV) Fighting Vehicles (Abrams, Stryker) Aircraft (AH-64) C4ISR (SICPS w/TQG)
CLOE/CBM+ Implementation Assessment Topics (6) RCM DODAF Architecture Standards and the CLOE STDV-1 CLOE/CBM+ Hardware and Software Infrastructure CBM+ Data Categories, Routing and Formatting Platform Communication Capabilities
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
AMG2CC Topics Dashboard
Reliability - Centered Maintenance (RCM)
2 CLOE/CBM+ DODAF Architecture
3 Data Standards
4
Network Communications
5
CBM+ Hardware & Software
6
CBM+ Data Categories
1
Each Topic Addresses:1. Concept2. Policy3. Standards4. Checklist
14
Dashboard
Cites Weapon System Examples
of Hardware & Software
Implementation
Cites Weapon System Examples
of Hardware & Software
Implementation
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
15
Army Platform Examples of CBM+ Imple-
mentation
Acft C4ISR
MRAP FMTV StrykerPM-HBCT(VHMS)
AH-64DSICPS
w/TQG1
Type Application
SAE J1708 & SAE J1587 XSAE J1939 X X X X (Pilot)Mil-Std-1553 Avionics, Turret, Weapons X XCAN Bus Consumables, weaponsEthernet C4ISR X X X
Component Source or Requirement
Drive Train COTS / RCM / Pilot X (COTS) X (COTS) X (COTS) X (RAM) X (RCM) X (Pilot)Consumables X X X X (Pilot)Weapon Systems X X XAvionics / Vetronics X XHigh-Failure X XHigh-Cost X XMission Critical X X
Dedicated X X (MSPU)2
Shared XNone X X
Type Application
Satellite ITV X (MTS3) X (MTS)Radio (SINCGARS/EPLRS) C2 (FBCB2 / JBC-P) X X X XWI-Fi CBM data Xfr X (pilot)
Type Application
Digital LogBook Interface to Log IT X (ACN4)
IETMTroubleshooting, Repair, PMCS
X X
VHMS / HUMS Health Management X (VHMS) X X (HUMS) X (Pilot)CM / AIT Config Mgmt X X
Type ApplicationJDMS5 or JTDI msg and file management
Message, interface and data file management
X (Pilot) X (JDMS) X (JTDI) X (Pilot)
Hull / Drive Train / GenSets /
ExamplesTWV
Digital Platform BackboneData Bus
Sensor Grid
RAM or RCM-determined for CBM
FV
Embedded SoftwareApplication Software
Embedded Communications
Embedded ComputingComputer, System health
Systems Software
16
DASHBOARD OVERVIEW
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
17
Dashboard(s)
There Are Two Dashboards Dashboard 1
A Worksheet-style Dashboard With The Checklists For Five Of The Six CLOE-CBM+ Compliance Topic Areas In The AMG2CC, Which Is Used To Build The Second Dashboard
Dashboard 2 A Dashboard Without The Checklists, Adding RCM Status (Completing the 6
CLOE-CBM+ Topic Areas)
Why Have Two Dashboards? Cleaner Presentation of CLOE/CBM+ Implementation Topics Without Clutter
on the GUI.
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
18
What The Dashboard(s) Are The Dashboards Are Adobe Flash Objects, Created Using A Software Program
Called SAP Dashboard. As Flash Objects, They Can Be Embedded License-free In Microsoft Office Applications, Such As Word And PowerPoint, And Adobe PDF Documents.
The Dashboards Present The Six Implementation Topics In The Form Of Gauges That Give A Sense Of Implementation Progress And Status.
Each Of The Six Topics Are Summed Into One Master Status Gauge
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
1Platform Worksheet
2Master Assessment
3Black-bezel Gauge Readings on Left are Transferred to Right
4RCM Status Acts as a “Throttle” on the Master Gauge
1Outer Black-bezel Gauges Readings are Determined by Input Mechanisms
2Inner Black-bezel Gauges Sum The Outer Gauges
The Dashboards19
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
20
Product Support Strategy Metrics Data
Sustainment Schedule O&S Data
MS B MS C IOC FRP FOC Sustainment
BCA
LCSP
CLS Start
Depot Standup
LRIP Contract Award
Blended Partnership Startup
PBL Recompete
Avionics PBL
PBL Recompete
Sustainment Approach Current (initial CLS covering total system)
Future (sub-system based PBL contracts)
Issues Shortfall in O&M funding in FYDP
Reliability and availability estimates are below goals
LCSP requires update before DAB
Resolution POM request for O&M restoration submitted
Reliability improvement plan with clear RAM goals up for final signature
LCSP in draft
BCA BCA BCA
Cost ElementAntecedent
CostABC Original
BaselineABC Current
Cost
1.0 Unit-Level Manpower 3.952 5.144 5.750
2.0 Unit Operations 6.052 6.851 6.852
3.0 Maintenance 0.739 0.605 0.688
4.0 Sustaining Support 2.298 2.401 2.401
5.0 Continuing System Improvements 0.129 0.025 0.035
6.0 Indirect Support 1.846 1.925 1.956
Total 15.046 16.951 17.682
Cost based on average annual cost per squadron
Total O&S Costs Antecedent ABC
Base Year $M 102,995.2 184,011.9
Then Year $M 245,665.3 395,147.2
SAMPLE PROGRAM: “ABC”
Today
Date:
MetricAntecedent
ActualOriginal
GoalCurrent
Goal
Current Estimate/
Actual
Materiel Availability 76% 80% 77% 71%
Materiel Reliability 37 hrs 50 hrs 50.5 hrs 48 hrs
Ownership Cost 245.6B 385.5B 395.1B 395.1B
Mean Down Time 12 hrs 20 hrs 18 hrs 15 hrs
CLOE/CBM+ Compliance Assessment
Sustainment Quad Chart with CLOE/CBM+ Implementation Assessment
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
PM Self-Assessment Example
21
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
22
PM ABCT (VHMS) Platform Self-Assessment
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
Dashboard Operation(Separate Demonstrations)
23
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
CCA Discussion
24CCA: Common CBM+ Architecture
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
What is the CCA? WHAT: The CCA Is An Integrated Architecture Description
Which Describes The CBM+ Infrastructure For End-to-End CBM+ Capabilities And Contains Metrics For Analysis.
WHY: Solutions For Achieving CBM+ capabilities for A MATDEV Will Vary. However, The Infrastructure Which Those Solutions Utilize Is Common Across The Army.
25
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
Value of the CCA• Reduces Risk
• Provides a Common Approved Infrastructure Verified and Validated by ASA(ALT) and TRADOC
• Ensures Alignment to the CLOE• Ensures Interoperability with LOGSA and the
CCBMDW
• Reduces Cost and Schedule • Single Integrated Communication Solution vs
Multiple• Shortens Development timelines• Promotes Data Re-Use• Eliminates Redundant Efforts
• Provides Architecture Analysis• Capability to perform SoS Interoperability Analysis• Network Performance & IA Analysis• Supports and Leverages Technology Insertion• Supports Effective Decision Making
• Support Compliancy to Army and DoD• AILA Integrated Achieved through the CCA• Supports All PM efforts in CLOE Compliance (AMG2CC)• Compliant with: CJCSI 6212.01F, AR 70-1, AR 750-1, DoDI
4151.22, etc.
PM B
PM C PM A
Data
Function
Services
Standards
Common Standards
Common Services
Function Specifics
Data Specifics
Redundant Efforts Common Infrastructure
Vs
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
27
What is at the Core of the CCA?• End-to-End “Common” CBM+ Infrastructure
encompassing Information and Network Systems• 26 DoDAF v2.02 Compliant Views• 50 Key Systems (Information and Transmission)• 35+ Platform Placeholders include ground, air and
C4ISR platforms.• 300,000+ Data Attributes organized to provide
efficient analysis with minimal effort to support effective decision making
Data
Attributes
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
28
Integration Process
• The AMG2CC identifies at a high level how to integrate with the CCA.
• The CCA Integration Plan v1.0 is comprised of the following topic areas (Appendix C of the AMG2CC):
– Integration Methodology– Pre-Integration Check List– Purpose & Scope Consistency– Integration Boundaries– Architectural Effectiveness Measurement– Integration Methods– IV&V Process– Transition to Integrating Stakeholder (PM / LCMC)
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
29
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
30
Path Forward
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
31
DASA APL Path Forward
Sustainment Quad Chart Sustainment Quad Chart Is Preferred Approach for CLOE-CBM+
Implementation Progress Reporting Institutionalize in Army Policy (e.g., AR 700-127)
Continuing AMG2CC Support (TBD) DASA (APL) LIA ATEC HQ AMC
Institutionalizing AMG2CC and Dashboard DA PAM proposal
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
32
Discussion