US Army Corps US Army Corps of Engineers of Engineers One Corps Serving the Army and the Nation Army MILCON Transformation… Army MILCON Transformation… Update Update MT Standards & Criteria Team Leader Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers NCSU Engineer Forum 21 May 2007
32
Embed
US Army Corps of Engineers One Corps Serving the Army and the Nation Army MILCON Transformation… Update MT Standards & Criteria Team Leader Headquarters,
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
US Army CorpsUS Army Corpsof Engineersof Engineers
One Corps Serving the Army and the Nation
Army MILCON Transformation… Army MILCON Transformation… UpdateUpdate
MT Standards & Criteria Team LeaderHeadquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
NCSU Engineer Forum21 May 2007
US Army CorpsUS Army Corpsof Engineersof Engineers
One Corps Serving the Army and the Nation
• DASA (I&H) Direction• The Challenge• Align with Industry• USACE Reinventing MILCON Processes• Framing the Strategy• The Model RFP… Time, Cost, Quality?• The Model RFP… What does it do?• After Award?• Pilots & Lessons Learned
OverviewOverview
US Army CorpsUS Army Corpsof Engineersof Engineers
One Corps Serving the Army and the Nation
DASA(I&H) DirectionDASA(I&H) Direction
• Development of strategy and implementation plan to support the major permanent restationing initiatives that the Army will execute.
• Overall objective is to provide the ability to establish, reuse/re-purpose facilities with minimum lead-time, leverage private industry standards and practices and to reduce acquisition/lifecycle costs
Nov 2004
US Army CorpsUS Army Corpsof Engineersof Engineers
• Function: House Soldiers• Construction Type: Type I or II non-combustible• Occupancy Type: Residential • Operations: Accommodate Sleeping/Bathing, Accommodate Relaxation/Cooking, Accommodate Privacy, Gather People, Facilitate Circulation
IndustryInstallation
Projected cost savings 15-20%Projected time savings 20-30%
US Army CorpsUS Army Corpsof Engineersof Engineers
One Corps Serving the Army and the Nation
USACE Reinventing USACE Reinventing MILCON Processes on MILCON Processes on
the Flythe Fly
Winning GWOT
Winning GWOT
Winning GWOT
Winning GWOT
Innovation &
Innovation &
Improvement
ImprovementInnovation &
Innovation &
Improvement
ImprovementTraining
Training
Training
Training
Quality of
Quality of
LifeLife
Quality of
Quality of
LifeLife
Business Business
Efficiencies
EfficienciesBusiness Business
Efficiencies
Efficiencies
Manning
Manning
the Force
the Force
Manning
Manning
the Force
the Force
Quality Outcomes
BRAC
BRAC
Execution
Execution
BRAC
BRAC
Execution
Execution
MILCON
MILCON
Execution
Execution
MILCON
MILCON
Execution
Execution
MILCON Pro
cess
MILCON Pro
cess
Reinvention
Reinvention
MILCON Pro
cess
MILCON Pro
cess
Reinvention
Reinvention
Statio
nin
gS
tation
ing
Statio
nin
gS
tation
ing
Inherently lin
ked Activitie
s
MIL
CO
N
MIL
CO
N
Tran
sform
ation
Tran
sform
ation
MIL
CO
N
MIL
CO
N
Tran
sform
ation
Tran
sform
ation
Mo
du
lar Fo
rce
Mo
du
lar Fo
rce
Initiative
Initiative
Mo
du
lar Fo
rce
Mo
du
lar Fo
rce
Initiative
Initiative
Real Estate
Real Estate Support
Support
En
virom
ental
En
virom
ental
Su
pp
ort
Su
pp
ort
“USACE must reinvent MILCON processes while executing Mission requirements and implementing MILCON Transformation”
US Army CorpsUS Army Corpsof Engineersof Engineers
One Corps Serving the Army and the Nation
Framing the StrategyFraming the Strategy
• Team effort between government and industry (Forums)
• Minimize Perceived Risk – Two Phase Approach, Performance Based, Process
Consistency, Evaluation, Execution, etc.)
• Programmatic Acquisition Strategy Approved – 1 Feb 2006– Moving away from acquiring facilities one at a time– ST Application (FY06-07), DB– MT Application (FY08 Transition), Combination of DB/DB(B)
US Army CorpsUS Army Corpsof Engineersof Engineers
One Corps Serving the Army and the Nation
Contracting ProceduresContracting Procedures
• Past Government methods– IFB– RFP Best Value
• RFP Best Value – LPTA– 1 Step RFP– 2 Step RFP
• Contract Mechanisms Design Build– Performance vs Prescriptive– MATOC - Multiple Award Task Order Contracts– SATOC - Single Award Task Order Contracts
US Army CorpsUS Army Corpsof Engineersof Engineers
One Corps Serving the Army and the Nation
Some Differences Between Some Differences Between Public and Commercial Public and Commercial
Design-BuildDesign-Build
Government- Competition in
Contracting ActFollow-on Contracts Must
be Competed
Price is a Consideration“Best Value”
(Price/Quality)
Price Usually Established at Award (FFP)
All Terms Defined at Award
Commercial – No Competition RequiredOn-Going Relationships are CommonQuality Based Selection is Common
Price Often Established After Design StartsCan Use “Guaranteed Maximum Price”FAR has no Exact Comparable Pricing Method
US Army CorpsUS Army Corpsof Engineersof Engineers
One Corps Serving the Army and the Nation
Contracting ProceduresContracting Procedures
• Developing the Request For ProposalSection D - Proposal Submission Requirements, Evaluation Criteria and Basis of AwardRFP Sections 00110 & 00120 or 00111