Top Banner
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® SAME “Meet the Chiefs” Mike Pearson Procurement Analyst Northwestern Division Regional Contracting Office June 2015
20

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® SAME “Meet the Chiefs” Mike Pearson Procurement Analyst Northwestern Division Regional Contracting Office.

Dec 21, 2015

Download

Documents

Daisy Perry
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® SAME “Meet the Chiefs” Mike Pearson Procurement Analyst Northwestern Division Regional Contracting Office.

US Army Corps of Engineers

BUILDING STRONG®

SAME “Meet the Chiefs”Mike Pearson

Procurement Analyst

Northwestern Division Regional Contracting Office

June 2015

Page 2: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® SAME “Meet the Chiefs” Mike Pearson Procurement Analyst Northwestern Division Regional Contracting Office.

BUILDING STRONG®

Regional Contracting Office

Julie Anderson – Regional Contracting Chief (RCC)

Cheryl Anderson – Deputy RCC

Mike Pearson – Procurement Analyst

Page 3: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® SAME “Meet the Chiefs” Mike Pearson Procurement Analyst Northwestern Division Regional Contracting Office.

BUILDING STRONG®

What is CPARS

C - Contractor

P - Performance

A - Assessment

R - Reporting

S - System

3

Page 4: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® SAME “Meet the Chiefs” Mike Pearson Procurement Analyst Northwestern Division Regional Contracting Office.

BUILDING STRONG®

Why EvaluatePast Performance?

- FAR 15.304(c)(3)(i) - past performance shall be evaluated in all source selections for negotiated competitive acquisitions expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.

- Performance records on similar contract efforts provides insight into the probability the offeror will successfully perform under your contract

4

Page 5: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® SAME “Meet the Chiefs” Mike Pearson Procurement Analyst Northwestern Division Regional Contracting Office.

BUILDING STRONG®

Reporting Thresholds?

- FAR 42.1502- Annually and when work is

complete- Contract/Orders > SAT ($150,000)- Construction > $650,000- Architect-Engineer > $30,000- Terminations for Default

5

Page 6: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® SAME “Meet the Chiefs” Mike Pearson Procurement Analyst Northwestern Division Regional Contracting Office.

BUILDING STRONG®

Pre-Merge State

Contractor Performance Assessing Reporting System (CPARS) Module – Systems, Services, Operations Support, Information Technology Contracts

Architect-Engineer Contract Administration Support System (ACASS) Module – Architect-Engineer Contracts

Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS) Module – Construction Contracts

Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) Module

6

Page 7: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® SAME “Meet the Chiefs” Mike Pearson Procurement Analyst Northwestern Division Regional Contracting Office.

BUILDING STRONG®

Post-Merge State

Single CPARS Application to Evaluate All Types of Contracts

► Systems► Non-Systems (Services, Operations Support, IT)► Architect-Engineer► Construction

Single Evaluation Form Single Set of Evaluation Areas Single Workflow Process

FAPIIS Module Remains Part of CPARS Application

7

MODULES MODULES

Page 8: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® SAME “Meet the Chiefs” Mike Pearson Procurement Analyst Northwestern Division Regional Contracting Office.

BUILDING STRONG®

Grading Scale

8

Rating Contract Requirements Problems Corrective

Actions

ExceptionalExceeds Many - Gov’t Benefit

Few Minor Highly Effective

Very GoodExceeds Some - Gov’t Benefit

Some Minor Effective

Satisfactory Meets All Some Minor Satisfactory

MarginalDoes Not Meet

Some- Gov’t Impact

Serious: Recovery Still

Possible

Marginally Effective; Not Fully

Implemented

UnsatisfactoryDoes Not Meet

Most- Gov’t Impact

Serious: Recovery Not

LikelyIneffective

No changes

Page 9: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® SAME “Meet the Chiefs” Mike Pearson Procurement Analyst Northwestern Division Regional Contracting Office.

BUILDING STRONG®

CPARS Roles

9

Focal Point/Alternate Focal Point (FP/AFP): Registers Contracts, Assigns Users, Provides Support

Contractor Rep (CR): Provides Comments

Assessing Official Rep (AOR):Assists Assessing Official in Preparing Evaluation

Assessing Official (AO): Sends Evaluation to Contractor Rep; Reviews Contractor Comments

Reviewing Official (RO): Resolves Disputes

Page 10: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® SAME “Meet the Chiefs” Mike Pearson Procurement Analyst Northwestern Division Regional Contracting Office.

BUILDING STRONG®

CPARS Timelines

10

Within 30 Days of Contract Award

FP/AFP, AOR, or AO Registers Basic Contract

Information

1

335 Days After Contract Award

Evaluation Appears on AOR/AO To Do List

2

365 - 485 Days After Contract

Award

AOR/AO Enters Evaluation Ratings &

Narratives3

365 – 485 Days After Contract

Award

AO Sends Evaluationto CR4

Page 11: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® SAME “Meet the Chiefs” Mike Pearson Procurement Analyst Northwestern Division Regional Contracting Office.

BUILDING STRONG®

CPARS Timelines (Continued)

11

Days 1 – 14 After Eval Sent to CR

CR May Send Comments

If CR Sends Comments and AO/RO Closes, Eval

Sent to PPIRS

5

Day 15 After Eval Sent to CR

Eval Available in PPIRS: - With or Without CR

Comments- Whether or Not It Has Been Closed by AO/RO

Note: Eval Marked as “Pending” if Not Closed

6

Page 12: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® SAME “Meet the Chiefs” Mike Pearson Procurement Analyst Northwestern Division Regional Contracting Office.

BUILDING STRONG®

CPARS Timelines (Continued)

12

Days 15 – 60 After Eval Sent to CR

CR May Send Comments if None

Previously Provided

If CR Sends Comments, PPIRS Updated to Reflect CR Comments; “Pending” Marking Removed When

AO/RO Closes Eval

7

Day 61 After Eval Sent to CR

Eval Returned to AO; CR Locked Out of Eval & May No Longer Send

Comments

8

Page 13: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® SAME “Meet the Chiefs” Mike Pearson Procurement Analyst Northwestern Division Regional Contracting Office.

BUILDING STRONG®

CPARS Timelines (Continued)

13

Day 61 After Eval Sent to CR – Day 120 After

End of Period of Performance

9

AO Must Either:- Close Eval (Eval Updated in

PPIRS)- Modify & Close Eval (Eval

Updated in PPIRS)- Send Eval to RO (Eval

Updated in PPIRS as “Pending”)

- Modify & Send Eval to RO (Eval Updated in PPIRS as

“Pending”)

Note: “Pending” Marking Removed When Eval Closed

CR CONCURRED

AO Must Either:- Send Eval to RO (Eval

Updated in PPIRS as “Pending”)

- Modify & Send Eval to RO (Eval Updated in PPIRS as

“Pending”)

CR DID NOT CONCUR

Page 14: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® SAME “Meet the Chiefs” Mike Pearson Procurement Analyst Northwestern Division Regional Contracting Office.

BUILDING STRONG®

CPARS Timelines (Continued)

14

Prior to Day 121 After End of

Period of Performance

RO Provides Comments & Closes Eval; Eval Updated in PPIRS with “Pending”

Marking Removed

10

The entire CPARS evaluation process must be completed within 120 days of the end of the period of performance!

Page 15: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® SAME “Meet the Chiefs” Mike Pearson Procurement Analyst Northwestern Division Regional Contracting Office.

BUILDING STRONG®

Email Notifications Email to CR if has not Provided Comments

on Evaluation within 14 Days►Sent Daily

Email to CR if has not Provided Comments on Evaluation between 15 and 60 Days►Sent Weekly

Email to AO if CR has not Provided Comments on Evaluation Within 61 Days►Sent Weekly

15

Page 16: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® SAME “Meet the Chiefs” Mike Pearson Procurement Analyst Northwestern Division Regional Contracting Office.

BUILDING STRONG®

FAQs What happens to the evaluation if the

Contractor does not provide comments within the 60 calendar day timeframe?

The evaluation will no longer be available to the CR and will be available for the AO to close. An email will be sent to the AO indicating that the evaluation is ready for closure.

16

Page 17: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® SAME “Meet the Chiefs” Mike Pearson Procurement Analyst Northwestern Division Regional Contracting Office.

BUILDING STRONG®

FAQs for Contractor Reps Will I receive automatic email notifications telling me

when I have actions due in CPARS?

Yes. An email will be sent to the CR when the AO sends the evaluation to you for comment, and will be sent daily for the first 14 calendar days after indicating action is due. An email notification to the CR will be sent weekly 15 calendar days after the AO submitted the evaluation indicating that Contractor comments are overdue. The weekly overdue reminder will continue until 60 calendar days after the AO’s evaluation signature date.

17

Page 18: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® SAME “Meet the Chiefs” Mike Pearson Procurement Analyst Northwestern Division Regional Contracting Office.

BUILDING STRONG®

How to Reach Us Julie Anderson

► Regional Contracting Chief► [email protected]► 503-808-3797

Cheryl Anderson► Deputy Regional Contracting Chief► [email protected]► 253-967-3475

Mike Pearson► Procurement Analyst► [email protected]► 503-808-3870

18

Page 19: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® SAME “Meet the Chiefs” Mike Pearson Procurement Analyst Northwestern Division Regional Contracting Office.

BUILDING STRONG®

Additional Resources CPARS Traininghttps://www.cpars.gov/allapps/cpartrng/webtrain/webtrain_all.htm

CPARS User Manualhttps://www.cpars.gov/cparsfiles/pdfs/CPARS_User_Manual.pdf

19

Page 20: US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® SAME “Meet the Chiefs” Mike Pearson Procurement Analyst Northwestern Division Regional Contracting Office.

BUILDING STRONG®

Questions?

20