Top Banner
Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol Greg McPherson & Joel Levin Climate Action Reserve’s Webinar May 20, 2009 Center for Urban Forest Research
47

Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Jan 05, 2022

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Urban Forest Project

Reporting Protocol

Greg McPherson & Joel LevinClimate Action Reserve’s Webinar

May 20, 2009

Center for Urban Forest Research

Page 2: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Power of Trees• 50 million trees, 15 yr• 6,400 GWh/yr,

$485M• Reduced emissions

1.8 Mt/yr• Sequester 4.5 Mt/yr • Total 6.3 Mt/yr• 4% of CAT target

Page 3: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Carbon Storage

• Vary by species • Vary by region

– Mature size– Growth rate

• Sequestered/yr– 50 to 200 lb

Annual Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide by Three Tree Species

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0-3 3-6 6-12 12-18 18-24 24-30 30-36 36-42 42+dbh (inches)

CO2

(lb/y

r)

Purpleleaf plum Siberian elm Deodara cedar

Page 4: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Energy ConservationReduced GHG Emissions

• Climate• Building• Utility• Tree • Reduced/yr

– 0 to 300 lb

050

100150200250300350400450

CO2

(lb/y

r)

0-3 3-6 6-12 12-18 18-24 24-30 30-36 36-42 42+dbh (inches)

Annual CO2 -- Mulberry (Phoenix)

Seq - Release Reduced Emissions

0100200300400500600700800900

CO

2 (lb

/yr)

0-3 3-6 6-12 12-18 18-24 24-30 30-36 36-42 42+

dbh (inches)

Annual CO2 -- Deodara Cedar (Santa Monica)

Seq - Release Reduced Emissions

Page 5: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Other GHG Benefits

• Fuel for biopower

• Wood products• Biomass/yr

– 25 to 100 lb

Page 6: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Emissions from Tree Care

• Vehicles • Equipment

– Aerial lift– Chipper– Chain saw

• Emissions/yr– 10 to 50 lb

Page 7: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Red Oak, West Yardwww.iTreetools.org

$0

$10

$20

$30

$40

$50

$60

$70

$80

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Energy CO2 Air Quality Runoff Aesthetics

Page 8: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Urban Forest Protocol: Worldwide Interest

• Over 4,000 visits to the Urban Forests & Climate Change Website

• Over 2,300 CUFR Tree CarbonCalculator downloads

Page 9: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

What’s a Carbon Offset?• Sequesters Carbon Reduction Ton (CRT)

– 1 metric ton (t) (2,205 lb)– Compensates for emissions

elsewhere– Real and verifiable

• Purchased via Registries to:– Offset emissions, carbon neutral– Fulfill corporate targets– Gain experience– Enhance branding

Page 10: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Why an Urban Forest Protocol?

• Reduce Risk & Increase Value– Rigorous Standards– Independent Verification

• Registered & Tracked• Credibility for Offsets

Page 11: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

What is the Protocol?Guiding Principles

• Best available science• Biomass formulas • Energy conservation

• Simple reporting process• Scope

• Mandatory: carbon stored and emitted

• Optional: energy, bioenergy, wood products

Page 12: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Am I an Eligible Project Developer?

• Eligibility• Utilities• Municipalities• Educational Campuses• Trees 15-ft apart

• Ownership• Demonstrate clear and

defensible rights to ownership -contract

Page 13: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Can I Meet the Baseline Performance Standard?

• Utilities: Additional if not a power line replacement

• Others: must maintain stable population of existing trees• Net tree gain (NTG, avg. 1

tree planted for 1 tree removed)

• Exceed Mandatory Planting Requirements

Page 14: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Where Will My Tree Sites be Located?

• Tree/site longevity - 100 year reporting

• Efficient maintenance and monitoring

• How minimize risk of tree loss?• Site selection• Species selection• Planting and stewardship

practices

Page 15: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Can I Shift Funds from Existing Tree Care to Project Tree Care?

• No, must maintain existing tree program! • 10% decrease in funding by program area

Page 16: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

How Much Reporting?• Initial Submittal Form

• Summarize the project• Eligibility, Activity, TMP, Monitoring

• Boundaries and Eligibility • Risk of Reversals• Co-benefits and Negative Impacts• Tree Maintenance Plan• Tree Monitoring Plan

• Annual Reporting Online• Compliance w/ TMP• Quantify CRTs

Page 17: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

What Monitoring is Required?• Monitoring

• Full inventory every 10 yrs

• Tree Maintenance Plan• Annual expenditures &

levels of service• Planting• Young tree care• Mature tree care• Tree removal• Admin/other

Page 18: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

How Will I Quantify Carbon?

•CRT = Cproj – Cemis– Tree measurements– Carbon storage equations– CUFR Tree Carbon Calculator– Amount and type of fuel

• Vehicles• Equipment

Page 19: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Will This Pay? Santa Monica• Value of Carbon Offset

– Now $5-10/t– 2020 = $50-60/t

• 1,000 trees, offset emissions, 100 yr • Costs - $3,175/site, $3,175,000

– Plant: $600/site– Remove/replace: $150/site– Other: $2,425/site

• Benefits – 15,000 t, 1,500 t/site– Reductions: 16,000 t

• 330 lb (0.15 t) /site/yr• No wood utilization

– Emissions: 1,000 t

• $3,175,000/15,000 t = $212/t

Page 20: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

How Do I Play?• Utilities – shade tree

programs• Cities – projects in parks,

buffers, streets, new development

• Campuses – integrate w/ sustainability

• Non-profits – partner w/ cities & utilities

Page 21: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

•Excel workbook -http://www.fs.fed.us/ccrc/topics/urban-forests/ctcc/•Calculates

– Annual carbon sequestration and total carbon storage

– Effect of tree shade on residential heating and cooling energy use and GHG emissions

– Aboveground biomass for estimating other GHG benefits

•Single tree calculator

Page 22: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Entering project data

Page 23: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Climate Zones

Page 24: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Entering tree data

Page 25: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Results

Page 26: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

ResultsLarge tree – West, 20-40ft

Stored CO2 and Emissions Reductions for Large Tree(Camphor Tree)

0

2

46

8

10

12

1416

18

20

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Year After Planting

Stor

ed C

O2

and

Red

uced

Em

issi

ons

(t)

CO2 Stored Emission Reduction

Page 27: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Starting a GHG Tree Project: Santa Monica’s Pilot Project

Page 28: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Santa Monica’s Rationale for a GHG Tree Project

• Sustainable cities goals

• Adds another element to emissions inventory

• Offset corporate emissions

• Quantify value of the urban forest

• Raise public awareness

Page 29: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Baseline Performance StandardExisting Trees: Maintain stable population & Net tree gain (NTG)

Page 30: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

GHG Project Tree Locations• Open-growing trees

• Parks• Residential streets• Public landscapes (schools,

gov’t bldgs)

• Tree/site longevity - 100 year reporting• Identify, characterize and

prioritize sites

Page 31: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Identifying GHG sites

Page 32: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Permanence and Tree Site Location

• What is the disturbance potential?• Relative need for tree canopy?

Page 33: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Evaluate “Public Control” of Sites

• Control by Agency Policy• Most control = parks, residential areas• Moderate control = public landscapes• Least control = business districts

• Sites can be affected by various projects

Page 34: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Site Disturbance Potential• Lowest = residential or parks

Page 35: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Site Disturbance Potential• Lowest = residential or parks• Moderate = main streets or medians

Page 36: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Site Disturbance Potential• Lowest = residential or parks• Moderate = main streets or medians• Highest = business districts

Page 37: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Prioritizing Sites• Longevity of the sites• Relative need for tree canopy

• Highest = areas with minimal canopy

Page 38: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Prioritizing Sites• Relative need for the canopy

• Highest = areas with minimal canopy• Moderate = intermediate canopy

Page 39: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Prioritizing Sites• Relative need for the canopy

• Highest = areas with minimal canopy• Moderate = intermediate canopy• Lowest = good canopy cover

Page 40: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Prioritizing Species• Start with results of

Benefit-Cost Analysis• Use proven performers:• Cedar (Cedrus deodara)• Ficus (Ficus microcarpa)• Canary Island Pine (Pinus

canariensis) • Evaluate new species

• Carbon: largest canopy for the site, long-lived

• Form consistent with existing species

• Evergreens for rainfall interception

Page 41: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Stewardship of GHG Sites

Page 42: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Tree Maintenance & Monitoring Plan

• Establishment (3 yr)• 1 crew• Water twice/wk (CNG truck)• Record daily vehicle mileage• Measure once/yr

• Post-Establishment• Incorporate into 2-8 yr cycle• Record daily fuel use• Measure during inspection/prune

Page 43: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Cumulative Reductions

-2,000

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

18,000

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Years After Planting

CO

2 (t)

Sequestration Emission reductions CO2 emissions

Page 44: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Co-BenefitsCumulative Co-Benefits for Large Tree

(Camphor Tree)

$0

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

$5,000

$6,000

$7,000

$8,000

$9,000

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Year After Planting

Ben

efit

Aesthetics Air Quality Energy Savings Hydrology

Page 45: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Benefit-Cost Analysis

• $6.6M total benefit

• $3.2M cost• BCR = 2.1:1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Years After Planting

Co-

Ben

efits

(Mill

ions

$)

Large Medium Small

Page 46: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Protocol to Practical:High-Performing Urban Forests

• Planning• Strategic Location• Tree Selection• Quality Stock• Planting• Maintenance• Monitoring• Annual Reporting

Page 47: Urban Forest Project Reporting Protocol

Questions?www.fs.fed.us/psw/programs/cufr