Upper Arrow Lakes Final Draft Management Plan Jan 2007

Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir Drawdown Zone Management Plan

Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir Drawdown Zone Management Plan

FINAL DRAFT

Prepared for:

BC Hydroand

Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir Drawdown Zone

Management Plan Liaison Committee

Prepared by:

Michael W. McPhee

Quadra Planning Consultants Ltd.

2976 Robson Drive

Coquitlam, B.C. V3E 2T1

July 2005

Revised January 2007

Table of Contents

11.0 Introduction

11.1 Background

51.2 Acknowledgements

52.0 Management Plan Process

62.1 Public Workshop

62.2 Liaison Committee

72.3 Resource Base Mapping

82.3.1 Recreational Activities

102.3.2 Competing Interests, Uses and Issues

102.3.3 Property Ownership

112.3.4 Environmental Attributes

113.0 Management Plan Recommendations

113.1 Guiding Management Principles

123.2 Recommended Uses and Actions

143.2.1 Area A: Revelstoke Dam to McKay Creek

213.2.4 Area D: Drimmie Creek to Akolkolex River (Wigwam)

233.2.5 Area E: Akolkolex River (Wigwam) to Shelter Bay

254.0 Implementation of the Management Plan

315.0 References

32Appendix A: Code of Conduct

33Appendix B: Public Workshop Discussion Points Summary

35Appendix C: Liaison Committee

41Appendix D: Resource Maps

1.0 Introduction

1.1 Background

This report outlines a proposed management plan for the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir Drawdown Zone that is located south of the Revelstoke Dam to Shelter Bay on the west side and Arrowhead on the east side (Figure 1). It was prepared through a participatory process involving a Liaison Committee, representing BC Hydro, property owners, recreational user groups, environmental organizations, government agencies and residents of Revelstoke, British Columbia. First Nations were kept informed throughout the process through face-to-face meetings and presentations, e-mail and written correspondence. Feedback on the plan was received and incorporated.

The linkages between aboriginal people and the Columbia system are long and enduring. The mountains provide for spiritual retreats and seasonal gathering areas among others, the passes, the valleys and the lake and river systems all provided routes for travel, transportation and associated trade. Further, these valleys and aquatic systems provided plentiful fresh water and abundant food supplies. They played an important role in constraining large mammal migration and travel, providing opportunities for efficient harvest. Habitation sites were, and to this day are, associated with sites that provide access to the resources important to aboriginal people. Historically the Columbia River, now the Kinbasket, Revelstoke and Arrow Lakes Reservoirs, were used by aboriginal people, possibly for hunting, harvesting, ceremonial and other purposes as well as for habitation, both seasonal and permanent.

Today, the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir is part of the Columbia River hydroelectric system and is located downstream of the Revelstoke Dam. It was created by the construction of the Hugh Keenleyside Dams in Castlegar in 1967. The reservoir was filled to its maximum operating level by mid-1969. The reservoir is approximately 240 km in length between the two dams.

While the Arrow Lakes historically fluctuated seasonally between 420 and 427 metres, the present operating regime of the reservoir creates fluctuations in water levels of up to 20 m.

Runoff into the Arrow Lakes Reservoir is primarily from snowmelt with over 70% of the annual runoff occurring from May to August. The reservoir is operated to capture as much water as possible during spring freshet within the maximum operating level. The annual cycle typically involves maximum levels at or below 440 metres during July and August followed by minimum levels at or above 420 metres during March and April.

Due to the reservoir operating regime, and soil and wind conditions recurring dust storms occurred in Revelstoke following creation of the Arrow Lakes Reservoir. In the 1970s and 1980s, BC Hydro investigated several ways of controlling the dust, including engineered approaches and revegetation. In the late 1980s BC Hydro began annual fall rye seeding of large dust control areas of the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir. Initially 200-350 ha were seeded and the program was expanded in 1991 to over 1000 ha. The seeding is modified each year based on projected reservoir levels, shifts in dust source locations, and the encroachment/establishment of native vegetation on previously seeded areas. The shift in treatment areas as a result of native vegetation colonization has allowed the annual seeding program to address other identified dust source areas while leaving wind erosion control to the re-established native vegetation on large portions of the drawdown zone.

With the increasing greening up of the reservoir drawdown zone more public use became evident. The revegetated areas also led to increased fish and wildlife habitat opportunities. In 1998, BC Hydro, through its Strategic Environmental Initiatives Program (SEIP) initiated a three-year pilot study to assess ancillary benefits associated with revegetation of parts of the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir drawdown zone that had been seeded to control dust. The project Evaluation of Ancillary Benefits of Shoreline Revegetation Project has documented the environmental and social benefits of the revegetation efforts (McPhee and Hill, 2003). With the re-establishment of plant communities in the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir Drawdown Zone there has been a growing public awareness of the conservation, aesthetic and recreational values of the area.

A study prepared for the Illecillewaet Greenbelt Society proposed that a conservation designation be given to the wetland areas of the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir (Waters, 2000).

Concerns had been raised by groups and individuals in Revelstoke over the potential impacts of some activities (e.g., motorized vehicles) on the plant communities and fish and wildlife habitat. Property owners who own or lease land in or adjacent to the drawdown zone also expressed concerns regarding trespass through private and leased property mainly from motorized vehicles entering or exiting the drawdown zone. Concerns have also been raised over the compatibility between motorized uses and non-motorized uses within the drawdown zone. First Nation concerns relate to the illegal removal, disturbance or defacing of items of cultural significance as well as the impacts of human activities on fish and wildlife resources and habitat within the drawdown zone.

In an effort to address these issues, BC Hydro convened a meeting of conservation and recreation user groups and other agencies in July 2002. The groups involved worked on developing a Code of Conduct. These groups included BC Hydro, the City of Revelstoke, Columbia-Shuswap Regional District, provincial government agencies, RCMP, Illecillewaet Greenbelt Society, Revelstoke Rod and Gun Club, Revelstoke ATV Club, and Revelstoke Snowmobile Club. An outcome from the meetings was agreement on the wording and placing of signs in September 2002 at key access points to the drawdown zone. The signs emphasized the need to follow a code of conduct when using the reservoir (e.g., no fires, no littering, etc.) and to alert the RCMP and Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection/Conservation Office if violations were observed (Appendix A).

BC Hydro also committed to initiating a management plan for the drawdown zone that would involve the various interests and stakeholders in the Revelstoke area. The management plan would be undertaken within the context of BC Hydros operating and management regime for the Columbia River system. It could include objectives and strategies to: confirm BC Hydros reservoir operations mandate and agreements that are in place that affect management of the drawdown zone;

promote vegetation growth in the drawdown zone to minimize dust impacts on the City of Revelstoke;

protect and enhance fish and wildlife and their habitat;

allow for recreation uses that are safe and respect the rights of property owners, environmental resources and values and other users of the drawdown zone; and

prevent illegal or other activities that could result in unacceptable risks and liabilities to BC Hydro and other adjacent property owners.

In April 2003 BC Hydro contracted with Quadra Planning Consultants Ltd. to facilitate the preparation of a management plan for the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir drawdown zone.

While BC Hydro initiated the management planning process, no single government agency or organization has overall authority or jurisdiction over the entire reservoir drawdown zone. Implementation of the management plan will depend on the cooperation and involvement of BC Hydro, federal, provincial, regional and local government agencies, First Nations, community organizations and the users of the drawdown zone.

BC Hydro is also preparing a Water Use Plan for its facilities on the Columbia River system. This process has operated in parallel to the current management planning process for the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir Drawdown Zone. The Water Use Plan is much broader in scope and deals with various water management operating regimes and issues that are beyond the scope of this management plan. This plan focuses on the management of public use and access in the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir drawdown zone. Both planning processes have kept abreast of information from each process that could have an impact on the respective plans.

1.2 Acknowledgements

The Management Plan could not have been prepared without the ongoing involvement and commitment of the Liaison Committee members (Appendix C). The Committee members provided valuable information, knowledge, ideas and constructive discussion of issues and solutions. They attended monthly meetings, participated in field trips and assisted with preparation of management plan guiding principles and recommendations. BC Hydro staff and Wendy Beauchamp, GIS contractor also provided valuable assistance throughout the project.

2.0 Management Plan Process

The management plan process involved a series of important steps. BC Hydro was committed to an open and participatory planning process involving ongoing participation and consultation with a wide range of organizations and interests. The process involved the following:

Conducting a community-wide public workshop in April 2003 to identify key interests and visions for the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir Drawdown Zone

Formation of a broad-based Liaison Committee to meet on a regular basis to provide ongoing advice and input into the management plan

Preparation of Guiding Management Principles to provide overall direction to the Management Plan

Identification and mapping of key resource information to provide a common understanding of recreational features, interests and uses, environmental attributes, property ownership, and issues

Presentations by key agencies on their respective roles in implementing the management plan

Preparation of draft Management Plan Recommendations and circulation to the Liaison Committee and key agencies

Finalizing the Management Plan

Conducting a Public Open House to present the Management Plan

Implementation of the Management Plan and Monitoring

2.1 Public Workshop

As an initial step in the process to develop a management plan for the area, BC Hydro sponsored a public workshop in Revelstoke on April 24, 2003. Letters of invitation were sent to representatives of organizations involved in the code of conduct discussions, property owners that border the drawdown zone, and other organized groups whose members regularly use the area. The workshop was also advertised in the local newspapers. The intent was to solicit input and encourage participation from a wide variety of interests. Nearly 70 people attended the workshop, excluding BC Hydro staff and facilitators.

The workshop provided an opportunity to learn more about the planning process, and to participate in a facilitated discussion to identify key interests, visions and guiding principles that should be addressed in the management plan. A workshop report documenting the workshop discussion was prepared and distributed to all workshop attendees (Quadra Planning Consultants Ltd., 2003). The document also includes comments received from those individuals (13) who returned comment forms. The key discussion points from the workshop are included in Appendix B.

2.2 Liaison Committee

At the April 24, 2003 public workshop a request was made by a BC Hydro representative to organizations and groups interested in participating on a Liaison Committee to assist with preparation of the management plan. Individuals and groups were asked to forward names to BC Hydro. BC Hydro also forwarded the invitation to participate to agencies, First Nations, and property owners with property in or adjacent to the reservoir drawdown zone.

A meeting was held on July 15, 2003 with property owners who expressed interest in the management plan. Property owners had a number of concerns relating to use of the reservoir which they raised at the meeting, primarily around trespass, noise, parties, and fire hazard. At that meeting it was agreed that property owners would be represented on the Liaison Committee according to the area where they owned property. The following areas were represented:

Revelstoke Dam to Boat Launch

Boat Launch to Airport

Airport to Montana Slough

Montana Slough to McKay Creek

McKay Creek to Drimmie Creek

Akolkolex River to Cranberry Creek

Cranberry Creek to Shelter Bay

The Columbia Shuswap Regional District (CSRD) representative on the Liaison Committee also represented property owners on the northwest side of the reservoir.

The Liaison Committee is comprised of 31 members representing a broad range of interests including BC Hydro (chair), property owners, RCMP, City of Revelstoke, Columbia Shuswap Regional District, Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection, Ministry of Forests, Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management, and various recreational and conservation organizations (Appendix C). First Nations elected to meet with BC Hydro separate from the Liaison Committee. Terms of Reference for the Committee and Guidelines for Discussion were agreed upon at the first meeting of the Committee (Appendix B). The Liaison Committee held its first meeting on July 22, 2003 and met several times over the course of preparing the management plan. Two field trips to the reservoir drawdown zone were also held in October and November 2003. The meetings were facilitated by the project consultant and generally followed the principle of consensus when working on items. The meetings had established agendas and included the following items:

discussion of the Liaison Committee Terms of Reference and Guidelines for Discussion;

presentations by representatives of organizations and individuals on their particular interests, uses and concerns in the drawdown zone;

discussion of Guiding Management Principles;

working sessions to identify and map resource information on recreational features and uses, access, issues of concern, and environmental attributes;

presentation by BC Hydro staff on Water Use Planning and relationship to Management Plan;

discussion of competing uses/interests and possible options/solutions;

presentations of agency mandates and jurisdiction; and

review of management plan recommendations and implementation mechanisms.

2.3 Resource Base Mapping

A series of map overlays were developed by the Liaison Committee to identify main recreational activities and features, access points, key issues, and environmental attributes within the drawdown zone or adjacent areas (Appendix D). Resource people also attended these meetings to provide additional information. Two field trips were also undertaken by the Liaison Committee to identify areas and issues on the ground. The information was plotted on maps with an orthophoto base of the area. The information was digitized using geographical information system (GIS) software. Additional information from BC Hydro and provincial TRIM mapping was also included such as topography, reservoir elevation levels, property ownership, roads, parks, bird nesting sites, etc. This information, along with the public workshop material and input from the Liaison Committee was used to develop initial information for discussion on competing interests and uses, environmental resource information, recreational uses, issues and potential solutions and options for resolving issues. These maps are in large scale format and are available for viewing at BC Hydros Revelstoke office.

2.3.1 Recreational Activities

The Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir Drawdown Zone supports a wide variety of recreational activities. When the reservoir is drawn down to low water levels (typically below 434 m), the exposed grasslands, wetlands and beach areas are heavily used. At low water levels old road and railway beds and other pathways are exposed which provide a network of accessible routes for motorized vehicles such as All Terrain Vehicles (ATV), motorcycles, and 4 wheel drive vehicles, cyclists, joggers, and walkers. People also enjoy birdwatching, walking their dogs, and photography. The drawdown zone also attracts campers and partiers. When the reservoir is closer to full pool (440 m), it becomes popular with boaters including canoeists, kayakers and fishermen. In the winter cross country skiing is popular and there is some snowmobiling. In 2001, BC Hydro as part of its project on the Evaluation of Ancillary Benefits of Reservoir Revegetation, undertook a stratified survey (by age and gender according to census demographics) of 400 Revelstoke residents to understand recreational uses in the reservoir (Pedersen, 2002). The chart below shows that troll fishing, hiking/walking, shoreline fishing, and camping were the most frequently mentioned activities.

A related study examined recreational activities undertaken by organized groups in the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir Drawdown Zone (McPhee, 2002). This study showed that groups in Revelstoke are involved in jogging, bird watching, all terrain vehicle riding (ATV), canoeing, kayaking, camping, fishing, hunting, horseback riding and model airplane flying.

The survey of Revelstoke residents also asked what areas of the reservoir they use the most. The following chart shows that Drimmie Creek (12 Mile), 6 Mile, Blanket Creek, around the airport, Cartier Bay and Montana Slough are the most heavily used areas in the drawdown zone. Overall, most recreational activity is concentrated between the Big Eddy area and Drimmie Creek. Many people also use Blanket Creek Provincial Park which contains a campground and beach and picnic facilities.

A study for the Illecillewaet Greenbelt Society (Waters, 2000) also identified a number of recreation uses in the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir. The most frequently ranked recreation uses included: dog walking, walking/hiking, nature viewing/bird watching, mountain biking, canoeing/kayaking, skiing, and fishing

A study prepared for the Revelstoke Community Futures Development Corporation (Future Legacy Consulting Group, 2000) examined recreation activities within the Columbia Forest District. Recreation activities identified by the study as occurring in the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir included: camping (Blanket Creek Provincial Park), canoeing/kayaking (early April-October; with 80-90% of participation by local residents), fishing (fly-fishing and spinning/casting from boats and shore; March-April; 80-90% locals), horseback riding (Airport flats; local residents), hunting (local residents), mountain biking (80% local riders), and power boating (May-October with higher use during summer months; 80-90% are locals).

The Columbia Water Use Plan also compiled information on recreational uses in the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir which confirms the uses mentioned above (R.L. & L Environmental Services, et al., 2000). BC Hydros Recreation Opportunities Inventory provides an inventory of recreational facilities in the area (i.e., boat launches, campgrounds, parks) (BC Hydro, 1999).

Scout68092.3.2 Competing Interests, Uses and Issues

A number of competing interests, uses and issues were identified by the Liaison Committee and previously by property owners and by participants at the Public Workshop in April 2003. These include:

Noise from motorized vehicles with no mufflers and boats such as jet-skis and seadoos

Noise disrupting nesting birds

Impacts of people, dogs and noisy vehicles on nesting birds and other wildlife

Trespass and vandalism on private/leased property

Partying causing noise, fires and litter

Impacts of mud bogging on sensitive grassland and wetland vegetation

Impacts of motorized vehicles on wetlands, grasslands, riparian areas and streams

Smoke and public safety risk from fires

Dumping of garbage and litter

Safety concerns over people accessing the airport runway

Concerns over creating a destination attraction for motorized vehicles

The locations of where many of these issues have occurred were identified on the resource maps.

2.3.3 Property Ownership

The majority of the property within the drawdown zone is owned by BC Hydro. There are also significant areas that are provincial Crown land and some privately held parcels. The City of Revelstoke and the Columbia-Shuswap Regional District also own parcels within the drawdown zone. There are a number of leaseholders located within the drawdown zone who lease both BC Hydro property and Crown land. Most leaseholders are property owners who own land adjacent to the reservoir. Most of the leased land is used for pasture forage or livestock grazing. The plan area maps show the property ownership by category within the drawdown zone. The Ktunaxa, Shuswap and Okanagan Nations consider the subject area traditional territory.

For the drawdown zone area from the Highway 1 bridge in city of Revelstoke to Arrowhead (elevation range: approximately 420 - 440m), the approximate total area is 5056 hectares (ha).

Property OwnerHectares%

BC Hydro

3080

61

Municipal Property136

3

Private Property102

2

Provincial Crown 1738

34

TOTAL

5056 ha100%

2.3.4 Environmental Attributes

The grasslands, wetlands, and riparian vegetation of the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir drawdown zone support a variety of wildlife. The area has become an important stopover for migratory birds, including passerines and waterfowl. The revegetation of the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir drawdown zone has enhanced the ecological values of the area (McPhee and Hill, 2003). The wetlands in the plan area are one of the most important wetland complexes within the Kootenay region. The drawdown zone and adjacent forested uplands provide important wildlife habitat (particularly in winter) for a variety of ungulates (deer, elk) and bears (Black, Grizzly). Cougars, coyotes and other wildlife are also distributed throughout the drawdown zone. The rivers and creeks flowing into the reservoir and areas within the reservoir itself provide important habitat for rainbow and bull trout and kokanee. Sturgeon are also found in several locations. The area also supports amphibians including the Western Toad and reptiles such as the Painted Turtle. A number of important fish and wildlife habitat areas were mapped by the Liaison Committee. These areas have also been identified as part of the Water Use Plan process. The resource maps prepared as part of the planning process identify important habitat areas based on the knowledge and input from Liaison Committee members (including representatives from the Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection and several conservation organizations). They have been used to identify areas that are sensitive to impacts from human use.

3.0 Management Plan Recommendations

The Management Plan Recommendations have two components:

1. Guiding Management Principles and

2. Recommended Uses and Actions

3.1 Guiding Management Principles

The following Guiding Management Principles were developed by the Liaison Committee to help guide the preparation and implementation of the Management Plan. They were drawn from the Arrow Lakes Reservoir Code of Conduct that was previously developed and approved by several participating groups and from input received at the Public Workshop (April 24, 2003).

Protect, conserve and enhance the natural environment and biodiversity of the area

Continue the revegetation program in the drawdown zone

Avoid sensitive areas such as wetlands, grasslands, bird nesting and migration staging areas and fish and/or fish habitat Respect wildlife. Give wildlife ample space and distance to avoid harassment Protect trees, shrubs, grasslands, streambanks, wetlands and other natural features from damage or disturbance

Keep domestic animals under control to minimize disturbance to birds or other wildlifeAllow for public access and recreational uses in areas designated for such uses and during appropriate times

Use existing roads and trails

Be respectful of others and their enjoyment of the outdoors Respect private and leased property and rights of landowners and lessees.

Trespassing is prohibited

Avoid creating loud noises

Promote public safety

Know and obey all laws, rules and regulations

Dumping and littering are prohibited Be aware that the reservoir is an active, operating reservoir used for hydro-electricity and that water levels can change quickly

Promote education, research, and scientific activities in the drawdown zone

Build awareness of applicable legislation and this management plan

Respect and conserve First Nations and others areas of cultural significance Disturbing or removing archaeological resources is a Heritage Conservation Act offence

Respect areas known to be culturally significant. Should areas or items of cultural significance be identified, notify appropriate agencies

Work cooperatively to protect areas of cultural significance

Do not disturb vegetation or materials designed to minimize erosion or stabilize soils

3.2 Recommended Uses and Actions

The following recommended uses follow the intent of the Guiding Management Principles listed above. While a variety of recreational uses are permitted, the Management Plan proposes recreation and public use restrictions in areas and routes due to environmental sensitivity, safety concerns, and proximity to private property. No new routes or access points are proposed within the drawdown zone and some existing routes (particularly those through sensitive grassland and wetland areas) and access points are proposed for closure (see recommendations and maps for each Area below in Section 3.2.1. to Section 3.2.5).

The recommended trail routes as shown on the maps below generally follow existing routes within the drawdown zone such as old roads, railbed or well used trails. Most trails accommodate a variety of uses, while some do not permit motorized vehicles. In most cases, the routes are well removed from residences (a minimum of 500 metres in most areas). In the southern portions of the plan area (Areas D and E), there is no motorized vehicle use in the drawdown zone (with the exception of boats). It is recommended that mudbogging not be permitted in the drawdown zone because of its damaging effect on sensitive wetlands. It is also recommended that recreational uses be restricted to daytime use only due to concerns over noise, fires and trespass. Fires and dumping are also recommended to be prohibited.

The Liaison Committee engaged in much discussion around concerns about the area becoming a destination attraction for motorized vehicles. There was concern expressed that the area not becomes a highway for motorized vehicles or a major motorized through route. The plan recommends that the drawdown be used by walkers, cyclists, joggers, horseback riders, and motorized vehicle users, using well established, designated routes. The area is currently used for nature enjoyment, interpretation and education and these would continue under the proposed plan. Hunting and fishing activities would continue under the proposed management plan, subject to existing government regulations for these activities. The proposed multi-user route would not extend completely from one end of the plan area to another and will discourage excessive speed. The route begins at the mouth of the Illecillewaet River and continues south to 9 Mile. A discrete access point and circular trail route is also proposed for 12 Mile (Drimmie Creek), one of the most heavily used recreation areas within the drawdown zone. The plan recommends that there be no motorized vehicle access, use or route south of this point within the reservoir drawdown zone, nor is it the intention of this plan to promote one. The area is also subject to flooding as water levels rise with the operation of the reservoir, so that for a good portion of the year, the route is discontinuous.

Because of the variety of users sharing the main routes and concerns over safety, a speed limit of 15 km/hr is recommended throughout the drawdown zone. It is recommended that all motorized vehicles be equipped with factory installed noise emission (muffling) equipment and all drivers be properly insured with a minimum of $2 million third party liability coverage and carry appropriate proof of insurance and identification.

While noise was raised as a concern in some areas, according to CSRD officials it is unlikely that a noise bylaw will be implemented by local governments.

The following management recommendations are proposed for managing public use and access within the reservoir drawdown zone. The plan area has been divided into five sub-areas (See Figure 1):

Area A: Revelstoke Dam to McKay Creek

Area B: McKay Creek to Greenslide Creek (9 Mile)

Area C: Greenslide Creek to Drimmie Creek (12 Mile)

Area D: Drimmie Creek to Akolkolex River (Wigwam)

Area E: Akolkolex River to Shelter Bay

3.2.1 Area A: Revelstoke Dam to McKay Creek

General Description:

This area is the most intensively used area within the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir drawdown zone because of its proximity to Revelstoke, the variety of features and the number of trails and access points. Major features in or adjacent to the drawdown zone include: Illecillewaet Greenway, City of Revelstoke boat launch, Machete Island, Revelstoke Airport, Montana Slough, 6 Mile and Cartier Bay. On the west side of the drawdown zone, the Big Eddy area is a popular recreational area with the dyke system used regularly by walkers, joggers and cyclists (Figure 2).

The area supports a diversity of fish and wildlife species. The rivers and creeks flowing into the reservoir support populations of bull and rainbow trout and Kokanee, while sturgeon have been found in several locations of the mainstem of the Columbia River. A variety of wildlife species use this area including deer, moose, bear, beaver, otters, amphibians and turtles. The area is a major migratory flyway for passerines and waterfowl and is used by herons and birds of prey. Machete Island and the surrounding grasslands and wetlands are particularly important for nesting birds. A bird banding and monitoring station is operated at this location.

Recreational activities include walking, dog walking, bird watching, nature enjoyment, photography, cycling, jogging, horseback riding, ATV riding, motorcycling, fishing and boating. In the winter, cross country skiing is popular and there is some snowmobiling. The old highway and railway bed provide the main routes. The most heavily used areas include the Machete Island-Airport area and 6 Mile. Schools and other organizations use a number of sites for educational purposes including: south of the City boat launch, along the Greenway, wetlands north of the airport, and Montana Slough. Main access points for vehicles include the Illecillewaet River mouth and 6 Mile. Pedestrian and bicycle access is available at several locations.

Several concerns and issues have been identified in this area by Liaison Committee members. These include: dumping of garbage and yard waste, fires, noise from parties and loud motorized vehicles, mud bogging in sensitive wetland areas, trespass, and impacts of noise, dogs and people on nesting birds. Several stream crossings and low, wet areas currently in use have been identified that need to be addressed by bridging or placing of culverts in order to prevent impacts to fish habitat. There is also a safety concern related to people accessing the airport runway and in 2004 the CSRD and Airport installed a fence to restrict access in this area. Several informal access points used by pedestrians and snowmobilers are located in the Montana Slough area. While pedestrian access could be allowed, it is illegal to cross Airport Way with an off-road vehicle. No motorized access or use is permitted in Montana Slough as shown on Figure 2. An area just north of Highway 1 on the west side of the river is also a popular area for walking and nature enjoyment, but has also been used for partying and noise is a concern to residents. Blocking off vehicle access in this area from the road could help to mitigate this concern.

There will be a need to educate users about the environmental sensitivity of the drawdown zone and the need to close certain trails and access points. Additional signage may be required, beyond the Code of Conduct to identify both multi-use routes and non motorized routes.

Recommended Uses/Actions:

1. Permit a variety of recreational and educational uses in this area as long as they do not negatively impact on environmentally sensitive wetlands, grasslands, riparian areas and fish and wildlife habitat.

2. Monitor public use in this area to ensure that sensitive areas are not negatively impacted.

3. Designate one multi-use route for pedestrians, bicycles, horseback riders and motorized vehicles as shown in Figure 2.

4. Where necessary, block or ditch routes to prevent motorized access and erect (no through road) signs (e.g., in vicinity of airport). Post 15 km/hr speed limit signs.

5. Designate trail routes for non-motorized use as shown in Figure 2.

6. Prohibit mud bogging

7. Restrict public use to daytime use only (no overnight use).

8. Prohibit fires and dumping

9. Provide public information and education regarding environmental resources and values (e.g., through signs, pamphlets, kiosk). Of particular concern is disturbance to nesting birds and wildlife from dogs, noisy vehicles and people through the breeding season (April-July).

10. Bridge or place culverts (agency approved) in low lying wet areas on the designated multi-use route.

3.2.2 Area B: McKay Creek to Greenslide Creek (9 Mile)

General Description:

This area includes the 9 Mile area which is a popular recreation area (Figure 3). McKay Creek is an important fish bearing stream for bull and rainbow trout and kokanee. A spawning area is located just upstream from the mouth of the Creek. The area also provides habitat for a variety of wildlife and birds including deer and cougar.

At 9 Mile there are several informal boat launches that are used, depending upon water levels in the reservoir. A number of roads intersect this area providing access when water levels are low. Popular recreational activities include walking, dog walking, hunting, camping, horseback riding, ATV riding and motorbiking. Cross country skiing and some snowmobiling occurs in the winter. Just south of McKay Creek the old railbed and road are washed out limiting motor vehicle access. This is not recommended for upgrading or repair.

The Liaison Committee identified several concerns in this area including parties, noise, fires, mud bogging, dumping, trespass, and shoreline erosion. At McKay Creek the crossing traverses the creek and bridging or culvert placement may be required. These must meet with agency approval (i.e., DFO, MWLAP).

It is proposed that there be a multi-use route as well as a non-motorized route as shown on Figure 3. Because of the washout of the old railway bed, another route is proposed as shown on the map. The main access would be from the current access point off Airport Way. This access and the multi-use trail route currently cross through a BC Hydro lease area. This lease will be amended to allow continued use of this route and public access. The multi-use route is restricted to the route shown on the map. No through route to the south is permitted and the shoreline along the south edge of this area is not open to motorized vehicles due to erosion and sensitivity concerns. There is no public access on the west side of the reservoir in Area B.

Recommended Uses/Actions:

1. Continue to permit a variety of recreational and educational uses in this area as long as they do not negatively impact on environmentally sensitive wetlands, grasslands, riparian areas and fish and wildlife habitat.

2. Monitor public use in this area to ensure that sensitive areas are not negatively impacted.

3. Designate one multi-use route for pedestrians, bicycles, horses and motorized vehicles as shown in Figure 3.

4. Where necessary, block or ditch routes to prevent motorized access and erect (no through road) signs. Post 15 km/hr speed limit signs.

5. No motorized vehicle access or use through the drawdown zone south of this point is permitted

6. Designate trail routes for non-motorized use as shown in Figure 3

7. Prohibit mud bogging

8. Restrict public use to daytime use only (no overnight use).

9. Prohibit fires and dumping

10. Provide public information and education regarding environmental resources and values (e.g., through signs, pamphlets, kiosk). Of particular concern is disturbance to nesting birds and wildlife from dogs, noisy vehicles and people through the breeding season (April-July).

11. Bridge or place culverts (agency approved) in low lying wet areas on the designated multi-use route

12. Post private/leased property signs (by the landowners/leaseholders)

3.2.3 Area C: Greenslide Creek to Drimmie Creek (12 Mile)General Description:

From Greenslide Creek to Drimmie Creek there is no public access in the reservoir drawdown zone, except by water (Figure 4). Vehicle access to the 12 Mile area is via Airport Road and a gravel road. The area is a popular destination point, particularly in the spring and summer months. Drimmie Creek is an important fish bearing stream and the stretch from the edge of the reservoir at full pool to low pool elevation is an important spawning area. The area is also important habitat for deer and birds.

Recreation activities in this area include boating, fishing, nature enjoyment, walking, camping and ATV and motorcycle use. Cross country skiing and some snowmobiling occur in winter. Typically, people drive out to the waters edge to recreate (beach use). There are two informal boat launching areas at 12 Mile. A multi-purpose route is not proposed through the drawdown zone either north or south from this point due to high water levels, washout conditions on the old railbed and proximity to private property. A circular route within the area was identified as shown on Figure 4 mainly to accommodate day users. It is proposed that several side (convenience) routes be closed to motorized use because of the environmental sensitivity of the area. There is no public access on the west side of the drawdown zone in this area.

Several issues were identified by the Liaison Committee in this area including: mud bogging in environmentally sensitive areas, noise, fires, parties, dumping and trespass.

Recommended Uses/Actions:

1. Continue to permit a variety of recreational and educational uses in this area as long as they do not negatively impact on environmentally sensitive wetlands, grasslands, riparian areas and fish and wildlife habitat.

2. Monitor public use in this area to ensure that sensitive areas are not negatively impacted.

3. Designate one circular multi-use route for pedestrians, bicycles, horses and motorized vehicles as shown in Figure 4

4. Where necessary, block or ditch routes to prevent motorized access and erect (no through road) signs. Post 15 km/hr speed limit signs.

5. No motorized vehicle access or use through the drawdown zone south or north of this point is permitted

6. Designate trail routes for non-motorized use as shown in Figure 4

7. Prohibit mud bogging

8. Restrict public use to daytime use only (no overnight use)

9. Prohibit fires and dumping

10. Post private/leased property signs (by the landowners/leaseholders)

3.2.4 Area D: Drimmie Creek to Akolkolex River (Wigwam)

General Description:

This area is characterized by Blanket Creek Provincial Park on the west side of the reservoir and Wigwam on the east side (Figure 5). Other than the Provincial Park and boat access, there is no public access within the drawdown zone in this area. At Blanket Creek there is a beach for day use and a campground. Educational programs are operated from the park. Boating, including kayaking and canoeing are popular in this area. Fishing is another popular activity. On the west side is the powerhouse for the Walter Hardman dam and an independent power producer (IPP) at Pingston Creek. On the east side there is an IPP on the Akolkolex River.

Fish and wildlife habitat is found throughout this area and a wide diversity of animals (deer, amphibians, bears) utilizes the area. There are fish spawning and rearing sites within the area. At Wigwam, the majority of the drawdown zone is under lease from BC Hydro or the Crown and there is also adjacent private property. The leased areas are used primarily for cattle grazing. The main issues identified in this area are trespass and vandalism.

Recommended Uses/Actions:

1. Restrict public access within the drawdown zone except for boating on the reservoir

2. Post private/leased property signs (by the landowners/leaseholders)

3. Post signs stating that there is no vehicle or pedestrian access or use through the drawdown zone

4. Prohibit fires and dumping

3.2.5 Area E: Akolkolex River (Wigwam) to Shelter Bay

General Description

No public access or use is permitted throughout the drawdown zone in this area, except for boating when reservoir levels are favourable for boating. There are a few private roads branching from the Crawford Forest Service road in this area. Access to or through private properties from these roads without permission from the property owner is illegal.

Large portions of the area provide bird and wildlife habitat, particularly for migratory birds, spring grizzlies and winter elk. The main concerns identified are trespass and vandalism.

Large portions of the area provide bird and wildlife habitat, particularly for migratory birds, spring grizzlies and winter elk.

The main concern identified is trespass and vandalism.

Recommended Uses/Actions

1. Restrict public access within the drawdown zone except for boating on the reservoir

2. Post private/leased property signs (by the landowners/leaseholders)

3. Post signs stating that there is no vehicle or pedestrian access through the drawdown

zone

4. Prohibit fires and dumping4.0 Implementation of the Management Plan

The Management Plan proposes multiple public recreation use while protecting the environmental resources and values in the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir drawdown zone. It addresses areas of interest and concerns raised by property owners and others. The Management Plan contains principles and recommendations to guide its implementation.

It must also be recognized that the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir is an operational drawdown zone that is regulated through existing agreements (Columbia River Treaty) and water licences. This operational regime is also influenced by external factors such as snowpack levels and the amount of rainfall. Public use of the drawdown zone will necessarily have to occur within these operating constraints.

What Needs To Be Done?

To implement the Management Plan, several functions will be required.

1. Management and Coordination

Management of public use in the reservoir drawdown zone is a shared responsibility. BC Hydro has a major role because of the large tracts of land it owns in the drawdown zone. However, effective management will require the coordination and cooperation of other government agencies and landowners who also own or control land use in the drawdown zone and adjacent areas, and have responsibility to enforce laws and regulations. All users of the drawdown zone play a key role in implementing the management plan.

To achieve this coordination in plan implementation a management structure is required. The structure would not replace decision-making and management authority of the existing agencies and institutions, but it would allow for cooperative and coordinated decision-making with respect to ongoing management of public use in the drawdown zone based on the principles and recommended uses and actions outlined in this management plan. Management expertise will be required in terms of land administration, fish and wildlife habitat management, cultural resource conservation, recreation use and planning, enforcement, volunteer coordination and public education.

2. Planning, Consultation and Monitoring

Ongoing planning and monitoring will be required as the Management Plan is implemented. The Plan is not intended to be a static document and may need to be modified as new information becomes available or issues arise that need to be dealt with. The proposed uses and actions in each of the five sub-areas will need to be monitored and if necessary, further planning and consultation may be required. More detailed planning may be necessary in terms of designating or refining access points, parking areas, routes, permitted or appropriate uses, signs, and other facilities. Monitoring of ecologically and culturally sensitive areas should occur to determine whether recreational use is impacting or disturbing habitats, wildlife and other resources. Further guidelines may need to be established or existing ones refined. The plan should be revisited on an annual basis to determine what is working and what needs adjusting.

3. Capital and Construction

Some capital projects will be required to fully implement the Management Plan. These could include: stream crossings, barriers to restrict motorized access in certain areas, rehabilitation of blocked or closed access points (e.g., planting/landscaping), posting of speed limits and other signs, public education and a kiosk. Items need to be prioritized and phased in over a multi-year schedule. Funding for capital projects may also be available through grants from organizations like the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program or Columbia Basin Trust. Groups or other volunteers may also be willing to assist with projects as directed by BC Hydro and other regulatory agencies that have a responsibility for approving works.

4. Operations and Maintenance

The drawdown zone will require ongoing property administration, maintenance, garbage removal, monitoring, etc. BC Hydro could consider sponsoring a youth crew to assist with drawdown zone education, surveillance, and clean-up activities as required. A Revelstoke Flats cleanup day could be held with volunteers assisting with garbage cleanup.

5. Enforcement and Emergency Response

Enforcement and emergency response are important functions in managing public use of the drawdown zone. Mischief and nuisances need to be controlled. Unauthorized uses of the drawdown zone must be deterred (e.g., motorized vehicles in designated non-motorized use areas). Public safety services need to be in place to respond to emergencies, accidents and fires. Emergency vehicles will need to access the drawdown zone. The main responsibility for enforcement within the drawdown zone on BC Hydro property lies with the RCMP. BC Hydro has primary responsibility for ongoing monitoring and public education and is proposing to have part-time employees provide surveillance activities on an observation/education basis. They may be equipped with off road vehicles with the objective of providing a presence within the drawdown zone, particularly during high use periods. If someone is in violation of the Code of Conduct or the Management Plan the BC Hydro employees would observe and record the activity, license plate, description of vehicle and attempt to discuss the infraction with the person(s) involved, informing them of the rules. If the improper activity continues to occur they would ask the person(s) to leave the drawdown zone and if necessary, would contact the RCMP for additional enforcement assistance.

6. Public Awareness and Education

The Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir drawdown zone offers much potential for awareness, education and interpretation. It is already used by schools and other organizations as an outdoor classroom, particularly for understanding nature. Natural and cultural features and environmental values could be highlighted through interpretive signs and a kiosk. The public also needs to be informed about the Management Plan and designated uses and routes within the drawdown zone. This will require signs and other communication programming such as brochures, maps, and fact sheets that can be distributed through organizations, City Hall, community centres, library and schools, etc. An annual event such as a Revelstoke Flats Walkabout might be a good way of raising public awareness around management and the features of the drawdown zone.

7. Mobilization of Resources

While it is expected that most of the funding required for plan implementation will come from BC Hydro there is also potential for grant funding and donated resources. The civic spirit evidenced through the Liaison Committee and the Public Workshop needs to be channelled and organized to make the Management Plan fully functional. Volunteers and users may be able, with proper instruction and supervision of BC Hydro or the RCMP, to set up a Reservoir Watch, much like wildlife watch, or adopt a trail programs that operate in other communities and areas of the province.

How Should The Management Plan Be Implemented?

Everyone involved in the planning process recognizes that there is much work left to be done. How can this work be organized?

A Plan Implementation Planning Phase should be initiated once the Management Plan is adopted by BC Hydro. Once adopted by BC Hydro, the plan can serve as a framework for planning and management of public use in the drawdown zone.

The best approach for managing public use in the drawdown zone is one that is able to carry out the tasks described above and implement the management guidelines and recommended uses and actions. The best approach is one which achieves the following principles:

Provides a firm basis for implementing the plan and managing the drawdown zone as an integrated unit with clear responsibility and accountability. This is done within the context of existing power agreements and water licence requirements for which BC Hydro is responsible.

Follows the general intent of the management plan while allowing for flexibility to enable further site-specific planning and response to local situations and changing needs.

Enables and encourages participation by the community, property owners, First Nations, government agencies and users of the drawdown zone in ongoing management and decision-making.

Enables the efficient mobilization of government and non-government resources to implement the plan.

Authority for Management Plan Implementation

Authority for public use and activities in the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir drawdown zone rests with several different agencies. BC Hydro as the main property owner and water licence holder has a lead role to play in working with stakeholders to manage activities in the drawdown zone on BC Hydro property. Portions of the drawdown zone are also owned by the Provincial Government and under the jurisdiction of Land and Water British Columbia Inc., a Crown Corporation, which is responsible for the allocation of tenures on Crown land and allocation of water rights in the province. The Ministry of Agriculture and Lands is the lead provincial government agency responsible for planning on Crown land. The Ministry of Environment is responsible for fish and wildlife management including habitat protection and hunting and fishing regulations. The Ministry of Forests is responsible for the maintenance of forest service roads adjacent to the drawdown zone and fire protection, outside City limits. The Ministry of Transportation is responsible for highway safety and access issues on provincially designated roads. The federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans is responsible for approving projects that could affect fish habitat. The Canadian Wildlife Service (Environment Canada) is responsible for migratory birds and their habitat.

Local governments have a role to play in management of the drawdown zone as well. First Nations representatives have also expressed interest in participating in implementation of the plan. The City of Revelstoke and Columbia Shuswap Regional District (CSRD) control land use within the City and Regional District boundaries (excluding Crown land). Each local government has the authority to implement bylaws such as Official Community Plans and a Regional Growth Strategy and to regulate activities such as dumping, soil removal, tree cutting, noise, animal control, roads, land development, burning, fire protection, water services, business licences, etc. Both the City of Revelstoke and CSRD own property within the drawdown zone including the boat launch and park, airport and portions of Machete Island. The City has the following section in its Official Community Plan concerning the drawdown zone:

17.1 The Reservoir Drawdown area comprises the portion of the Arrow Lakes Reservoir lying between maximum and minimum reservoir level. Much of this land is unused with the exception of recreation activities occurring when the reservoir is not at full pool. Community concern has arisen with respect to dust storms generated on extensive exposed areas when water levels in the reservoir are low. Limited filling has taken place to reclaim some of the inundated land.

Objectives

17.2 It is Council's objective to restrict development of the Reservoir Drawdown area to uses which are not subject to flood damage, and to work with BC Hydro in properly managing the area.

Policies

17.3 It is Council's policy to designate the Reservoir Drawdown area as shown on Schedule C - Land Use Map.

17.4 It is Council's policy to encourage recreational pursuits which are conducted safely and without impairing dust control activities in the Reservoir Drawdown area.

17.5 It is Council's policy to encourage BC Hydro to continue its dust control program in the Reservoir Drawdown area.

17.6 It is Council's policy to work with BC Hydro and BC Environment in considering portions of the Reservoir Drawdown which may be reclaimed for other land uses through filling.

The Royal Canadian Mountain Police (RCMP) is responsible for enforcing the Criminal Code of Canada. The RCMP will respond to complaints regarding parties, noise, and trespass in the drawdown zone.

Proposed Management Structure

All those involved in the planning process supported a cooperative approach for managing public use in the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir drawdown zone. Given the multitude of interests and authorities involved a coordinated approach is essential. The following management structure is proposed:

Ongoing participation by agencies, First Nations, property owners, users and other key interests is essential to successful Plan management and implementation. The Liaison Committee that was instrumental in developing the Management Plan would provide a good pool of candidates for ongoing involvement in plan implementation. The Liaison Committee represents property owners, agencies, First Nations, users and other community interests. Sub-committees could also be established to tackle specific issues. BC Hydro should continue to chair the committee. The composition of the committee could be based on the following criteria:

Represent a range of community interests within the region that have an interest in the management of the drawdown zone

Include approximately 6 members (2-3 year term) and 2 full time BC Hydro members to allow for efficient functioning of the advisory committee

Selection of the members will be coordinated by BC Hydro, but representatives will be selected by the community groups involved.

Committee members could potentially include the following community interests:

Property owners

Local Government (City of Revelstoke, CSRD)

First Nations

Environment

Equestrian users

Hunting and fishing

Motorized recreation users

Education

Youth

Government agencies such as RCMP, Ministry of Environment, Ministry of Agriculture and Land, Ministry of Forests, Ministry of Highways, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, etc. could be considered ex-officio members of the committee, and will be called upon for assistance as required.

It may need to meet monthly initially for the first six months to kick start plan implementation during the Implementation Planning Phase. During this phase it will be necessary to establish Committee Terms of Reference, identify priorities, enforcement and monitoring activities, a budget, public information, signage, etc. After that, quarterly meetings may be necessary. An annual plan review, including a field trip for all committee members should be instituted. The review should identify areas where the plan is working and where further work or assessment of issues needs to be done. The plan should be seen as a living document and updated on a regular basis. The committee meetings would also be the forum for community interests to make a presentation regarding any issue or concern. An important component of plan implementation will be ongoing communications to keep the public regularly informed about meetings, events, issues, etc.

5.0 References

BC Hydro. 1999. Recreation Opportunities Inventory. Power Supply - Environment. Burnaby, B.C.

McPhee, Michael W. and Edward L. Hill (editors). 2003. Strategic Environmental Initiatives Program: Evaluation of Ancillary Benefits of Reservoir Shoreline Revegetation in the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir - Overview Report. BC Hydro.

Future Legacy Consulting Group. 2000. Revelstoke Area Recreation Inventory - Columbia Forest District. Revelstoke Community Futures Development Corporation. Revelstoke, B.C.

McPhee, Michael W. Group and Organized Recreation Activities in the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir Drawdown Zone. March 2002

Pedersen, Marc. Upper Arrow Seeding and Recreation Study. BC Hydro Research Services, August 2001.

Quadra Planning Consultants Ltd. 2003. Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir Drawdown Zone

Management Plan. April 24, 2003 Public Workshop Report. Prepared for BC Hydro.

R.L. &L. Environmental Services Ltd. et. al. 2000. Environmental Information Review and Data Gap Analysis. Volume I: Upper Columbia, Mica and Revelstoke Projects and Volume 2: Lower Columbia Keenleyside Project Draft Reports. Prepared for BC Hydro, Water Use Planning. Burnaby. B.C.

Waters, Lauren. 2000. Revelstoke Wetlands Conservation Area Feasibility Study. Prepared for The Illecillewaet Greenbelt Society. Revelstoke, B.C.

Appendix A: Code of Conduct

Appendix B: Public Workshop Discussion Points Summary

Key Discussion Points from the April 23, 2004 Public Workshop

Question 1: What key interests should the Management Plan address?

Maintain Access maintain equal and public access to the reservoir drawdown zone for all recreational users

use existing roads/rights of way and railway bed for motorized use

Protect Ecological Values

protect the fish and wildlife habitat values

restore and enhance fish and wildlife habitat

Respect Private Property

respect property owners interests

improve mapping and signage of private property boundaries

Enforce Code of Conduct

need better enforcement of existing code of conduct

Question 2: What is your vision for the Upper Arrow Drawdown Zone?

BC Hydros Commitment

BC Hydro to continue its responsibility for managing the reservoir under the international agreements and also its commitment to the reseeding program. There was also interest in seeing the Columbia Basin Compensation Program continued in the reservoir. Mix of Balanced Uses

Designate areas for park, wildlife and recreation (motorized and other)

Sustainable regulated use that doesnt degrade the ecosystem and balances the interests of fish, wildlife and user groups

Fair and equal access for all users, not just special interest groups

Mutual respect among user groups (self enforcement)

Respectful use of area by all users

Protection of Natural Environment

Natural protection of area with very little access (walk in zones)

Promote educational activities in natural areasQuestion 3: What should be some Guiding Principles for the management of the Upper Arrow Drawdown Zone?

Participants in the four groups mentioned the following points frequently:

Promoting responsible multiple use

Consultation with users prior to access deactivation/closures

Equal access on crown and BCH lands within boundaries of protecting fish and wildlife

Long-term commitment to maintaining and enhancing the natural environment

Respect environment and mutual respect for different users

Respect private property

Maintain quality of experience

Keep it simple

Adopt Code of Conduct principles/Self Enforcement

Appendix C: Liaison Committee

Liaison Committee Members

Al Obrigewitsch, Revelstoke ATV Club

Debby Robinson, Property Owner - Airport to Montana Slough

Janis Hooge, Property Owner - Montana Slough to McKay Creek

Jim Graham, Property Owner - Akolkolex River to Cranberry Creek

Ivan Graham, Property Owner McKay Creek to Drimmie Creek

Michelle Allsopp, Property Owner - Akolkolex River to Cranberry Creek

David Allsopp, Community Member

Tom Dickson, Revelstoke Snowmobile Club

Jackie Morris, North Columbia Environmental Society

Loni Parker, Columbia Shuswap Regional District, Property Owner - Northwest Side of Reservoir

Angela Howe, Property Owner McKay Creek to Drimmie Creek

Alan Mason, City of RevelstokeBill Shuttleworth, Friends of Mount Revelstoke and Glacier

Colin MacRae, Revelstoke Rod and Gun Club

Adam Christie, Conservation Office, Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection

Maureen Weddell, Community Member

Chris Beers, Canadian Columbia Intertribal Fisheries Commission

Lewis Zambon, Community Member

Glen Burgess, Ministry of Forests

Clara Maltby, 1st Revelstoke District Scouts Canada

Grant Dowdy, Property Owner - Cranberry Creek to Shelter Bay

Helen Shuttleworth, Selkirk Saddle Club

Toni Johnston, Illecillewaet Greenbelt SocietyGordon McAdams, Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management

Ken Kushner, Revelstoke Flying Club

Cst. Cliff Randall, RCMP

Cory Legebokow, Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection

Rocco Zappone, Property Owner - Revelstoke Dam to Boat Launch & Boat Launch to Airport

Bob Marshall, Manager, Revelstoke Generating Station, BC Hydro

Nancy MacLeod, Community Relations Manager, BC Hydro

Ian MacLean, BC Hydro, (replaced by Bob Marshall)

Facilitator:

Mike McPhee, Quadra Planning Consultants Ltd.

BC Hydro

Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir Drawdown ZoneManagement Plan

Liaison Committee

Terms of Reference

1. Background

In the Fall 2002, BC Hydro posted code of conduct signs at popular access locations along the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir drawdown zone between Revelstoke and Shelter Bay. The development of this code of conduct and signage was an initial step in an initiative involving multiple interest groups in the development of a strategy to protect the area while accommodating compatible public use.

Given the increased and multiple uses being seen within drawdown zone, BC Hydro believes this type of public process is needed to work in cooperation with all users in an effort to accommodate multiple-use interests within the context of respectful behaviour that protects the ecosystem. The groups involved in working on developing the code of conduct included BC Hydro, the City of Revelstoke, Columbia-Shuswap Regional District, provincial government agencies, RCMP, private land owners, Illecillewaet Greenbelt Society, Revelstoke Rod and Gun Club, Revelstoke ATV Club, and Revelstoke Snowmobile Club.

The next step is the development of a management plan to address public use in the drawdown zone of the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir. To assist with the management plan, BC Hydro has invited representatives of organizations and property owners to sit on a Liaison Committee that will provide input in the preparation of the management plan.

The purpose of this Terms of Reference (TOR) is to outline the purpose and operating guidelines for the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir Drawdown Zone Management Plan Liaison Committee (Liaison Committee).

2. Purpose

The Liaison Committee serves a very important role in providing knowledge and technical information to BC Hydro and its consultant in preparation of a Management Plan for the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir Drawdown Zone.

The kinds of activities the Liaison Committee may be involved in include:

1. Providing technical input and other knowledge to BC Hydro on:

recreational uses of the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir Drawdown Zone (e.g., types of use, areas of use, patterns of use, intensity and timing of use).

environmental and social resources and values of the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir Drawdown Zone (e.g., fish and wildlife habitat, heritage sites).

2. Identifying practical solutions to avoid or mitigate conflicts between recreation uses and private property owners.

3. Identifying practical solutions to avoid or mitigate harmful impacts from human uses on the ecological resources of the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir Drawdown Zone.

4. Providing comments on draft management plan reports as prepared by BC Hydro or its consultants.

5. Providing input on other items that may arise from time to time in the course of preparing the management plan.

6. Providing, in cooperation with BC Hydro, a role in ongoing stewardship of the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir Drawdown Zone. The Liaison Committee could also have a role in the implementation of the management plan.

3. Committee Meetings and Format

It is expected that the Liaison Committee will meet 5 - 6 times during the course of the preparation of the management plan. This could include:

a field trip to the reservoir drawdown zone and presentations on information relevant to the preparation of the management plan (e.g., Trespass Act, Motor Vehicle Act, etc.)

a working session to provide input into the development of the management plan (e.g., goal, objectives, guiding principles, technical information);

a working session to review a draft management plan;

a working session to review public comments on the draft management plan and identify changes required; and

a working session to review the final draft management plan.

The Liaison Committee is not a decision-making body. There will be no voting. The Committee is expected to provide input, knowledge and advice to BC Hydro in the preparation of the management plan. BC Hydro will draw upon this input and advice of the Liaison Committee in preparing the management plan.

The management plan is also being prepared in the context of existing legal agreements that govern how BC Hydro operates and manages the Upper Arrow Lakes Reservoir Drawdown Zone.

BC Hydro or its designate will chair the Liaison Committee meetings and will provide a venue for the meetings. Agendas will be sent out in advance of the meetings and notes will be kept at each meeting and circulated to Committee members and other interested parties.

Meetings will normally be open to the community, except in cases where confidentiality may require in-camera discussion. Non-committee members who attend the meetings will be designated as observers and will not participate in the committee discussions.

Observers may have an opportunity to make a presentation or provide comments to the Liaison Committee, with advance notice to the Chair, who will decide whether the meeting agenda can be adjusted to accommodate the presentation.

The Liaison Committee, through the Chair, may invite guest speakers to provide a technical presentation, or to respond to questions, on a subject relevant to the Management Plan. The guest presentation will be scheduled as an agenda item at an upcoming meeting.

4. Committee Members

Participation on the Liaison Committee is open to individuals and organizations with an interest in the Arrow Lakes Reservoir Drawdown Zone. Participants have been invited from local and regional government, regulatory and enforcement agencies, First Nations, local community organizations, and property owners.

Committee membership will provide for equitable representation of organized community interests within the area through the appointment of one designate per organization. For the efficient and smooth functioning of the Liaison Committee, it is expected that Committee members will:

Regularly attend each scheduled meeting of the Committee.

Designate an alternate representative to attend in your place if you cannot attend. The designated alternate should be familiar with the discussions, past minutes, and other material distributed by the Liaison Committee. The alternate should become familiar with these Terms of Reference. If the main representative and the alternate are both present at a meeting, only one can be the spokesperson for the organization at the meeting. The other will be an observer.

Be the key contact person to answer questions from and disseminate information to the individuals you are representing through your membership.

Communicate with members of your organization by relaying proceedings of the Liaison Committee to your constituents and bringing constituents' concerns to the Liaison Committee.

Prepare for each meeting by reading meeting notes or other materials distributed and bringing information and knowledge to the meeting as required. This could include any research necessary to support their interests.

Actively participate in Committee discussions and activities. Indicate to the other members of the Liaison Committee if your agreement is subject to approval from your constituents or governing bodies.

Respect confidentiality of certain information as may be required from time to time.

Treat each Committee member with respect.

5. Guidelines for Committee Discussions

5.1 Interest Based Discussions

Committee members will focus on interests and needs rather than positions. Focusing on interests and needs creates more opportunities for an all-inclusive, long-lasting solution than does focusing on positions. Positions are predetermined solutions that do not necessarily consider the needs of others. Interest based decision making includes:

Focusing on interests, not positions

Focusing on the issues, not the messengers

Generating criteria (objectives) for what we want the solution to achieve

Generating a variety of possible solutions

Evaluating the solutions against the criteria/objectives

Selecting the solution that best meets everyone's needs

5.2 Guidelines for discussions

Focus on interests and needs, not positions.

Separate the problem from the person; focus on the issue, not the individual.

Listen to understand before speaking.

Explore other points of view; ask clarifying questions.

Contribute to and participate in collaborative learning.

Differences of opinion are okay.

Accept that concerns and interests of others are legitimate and real.

Respect each other.

One speaker at a time, let others finish speaking before speaking.

Respect the Committee's time; recognize when discussions drift off-topic

Work cooperatively towards solutions that best meet as many interests and needs as possible.

5.3 Consensus Decision Making

Consensus building is the process of tackling problems together and to collaboratively develop solutions that takes into account all stated needs. When the Liaison Committee agrees that a particular solution is the best and that all members are able to live with the decision, we will have reached an agreement by consensus.

When a solution involves many parts, consensus agreement is agreement on the whole package. There may be some parts that do not entirely satisfy a committee members interests, but on the whole, we are in agreement on the whole package.

An agreement need not be a final decision. The Committee may decide to revisit an agreement if new information becomes available relevant to a past decision.

5.3.1 Non-consensus

If the Liaison Committee is unable to reach a unanimous agreement, a record of the dissenting members concerns for certain part(s) of the agreement will be made. This record should identify how the management plan does not meet their needs and what are possible alternative and acceptable solutions.

5.3.2 Consensus on the final Management Plan report

The Committee will sign-off on the final Management Plan report. In the event that we are unable to reach a unanimous agreement on the Management Plan, the report will tally the three levels of agreement on the solution:

Endorse: endorse fully or with minor reservations

Accept: Support the group decision and minimum needs are met, but disagree that the solution is the best

Object: Minimum needs are not met and cannot support the decision

6. Plan Implementation

The Liaison Committee may have a role in implementing the management plan. This could include stewardship activities and periodic review and updating of the management plan.Appendix D: Resource Maps

PAGE