7/7/17 1 1 Kevin Shah, MD MBA Update on the Affordable Care Act 2 Review major elements of the affordable care act Review implementation of the Individual Exchange Review the Medicaid expansion Discuss current state of legislation to repeal the Affordable Care Act Goals
23
Embed
Update on the Affordable Care Act Kevin Shah, MD MBA · Update on the Affordable Care Act 2 Review major elements of the affordable care act Review implementation of the Individual
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
7/7/17
1
1
KevinShah,MDMBA
Update on the Affordable Care Act
22
Review major elements of the affordable care act
Review implementation of the Individual Exchange
Review the Medicaid expansion
Discuss current state of legislation to repeal the Affordable Care Act
Government spending on Medicare, Medicaid and newly created exchanges are growing, while employer based coverage is stagnating
Overview
7/7/17
4
7
ThePPACAhadseveralmajorcomponents
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA)• Expanding coverage: public insurance exchange, Medicaid expansion• Financing: New taxes, reduced reimbursements to providers, individual
mandate• Insurance Reform: Ban on preexisting conditions and lifetime limits; children
covered to age 26; Essential health benefits; Individual mandate; employer mandate
• Payment reform: pay for value initiatives, penalties for poor care• Delivery system reform: new models of care
Implications• Increased focus on paying for quality and reducing cost• Fundamental shift in how individual patient care is delivered
ThePPACAimplemented“communityrating”forallpayersBan on Preexisting Conditions• Banned “individual rating” for health insurance• Gender parity: women and men charged equally• Ban on life time limits• Limits on out of pocket costs• Pricing adjustment can be made on 3 parameters:
– Age (up to 3x variation)– Tobacco use (50% variation)– Location (this can vary, ~ 4x based on 2017 plans)
Individual Mandate• In order to implement the ban on pre-existing conditions,
payers needed an adequate number of low risk enrollees to minimizer risk
• Penalty in 2017: – 2.5% of income OR – $695 per adult / $395 per child, whichever is
HIGHER• Numerous exemptions for low income, high cost burden
for insurance, individuals who don’t need to file taxes
InsuranceReforms
Community rating requires some version of an individual mandate.
Ban on lifetime limits and cap on out of pocket costs à higher premiums and deductibles
Lacking an effective mandate could lead to both adverse selection and moral hazard
* Enrollment numbers vary between people who sign up and those who actually pay premiums
• There is substantial interstate variability in total and potential enrollment• There remains a large non-exchange individual enrollment from ACA compliant and
grandfathered plans
7/7/17
8
15
IndividualExchangesMany insurers are leaving the market and limiting choice
Kaiser Family Foundation
16
IndividualExchangesNumber of carriers varies by geography
Kaiser Family Foundation
7/7/17
9
17
IndividualExchangesRemaining insurers are raising premiums
Kaiser Family Foundation, E-Healthinsurance report
• There is substantial interstate variation• Premiums are averages, and vary by age, location any smoking status• Premium changes for family plans show similar percentage increases
39.9%
42.2%
27.4%
44.4%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2014-2017
18
IndividualExchangesExchanges sell 4 levels of plans based on actuarial value
Kaiser Family Foundation, Healthcare.gov
• Money direct to enrollee• Reduce monthly premiums• Pegged to the cost of a silver plan• Available to anyone with income up to
400% of the Federal poverty level
Premium Subsidies
Monthly Premium Patient Costs Plan Actuarial Value
• Money direct to health plan• Reduce out of pocket costs
(deductible, co-pay, co-insurance)• Available to anyone with income up
to 250% of the Federal poverty level• Under significant legal and political
uncertainty
Cost sharing subsidies
7/7/17
10
19
IndividualExchangesDeductibles and co-pays are a substantial burden
Kaiser Family Foundation
• In 2017, 94% of enrollees choose Bronze or silver plans, thus were exposed to very high out of pocket costs
• Higher income patients not eligible for cost sharing subsidies are exposed to higher costs
20
IndividualExchangesPremium subsidies defray some of the up front cost
McKinsey 2017 Intel Brief on public exhanges; Department of HHS, Center for Health and Economy
Premium subsidies are designed to cap an enrollees premium costbased on income
People with income <100% of FPL are NOT eligible for premium subsidies
Federal poverty levels do NOT adjust for locations
2016 estimated subsidy cost: $32.8 billion
Federal poverty level (FPL), by household size
Premium cap, by FPL
7/7/17
11
21
IndividualExchangesIncome affects premium and premium increases
McKinsey 2017 Intel Brief on pulibc exhances
22
IndividualExchangesCost sharing subsidies help defray consumer cost
Kaiser family foundation; Congressional budget office; US Dept of Health and Human Services
Key points• Caps out of pocket costs AFTER premium payments.• Adjustments made when enrollee purchases and payers get paid later
• If income <100% of FPL, no cost sharing subsidies are available
• Estimated costs in 2017: ~ $7 billion• Under significant scrutiny in federal court prior to the current administration
7/7/17
12
23
IndividualExchangesThere is a notable shift towards managed care
McKinsey 2017 Exchange Market Report
24
IndividualExchangesPlans have employed narrow networks to hold down cost
McKinsey 2017 Exchange Market Report, New York Times
Broad patient choice of hospitals and providers
Higher cost relative to narrow network plans
Limited choice of hospitals and providers
Variable out of network coverage
Lower cost and cost increases over time
7/7/17
13
25
IndividualExchangesNotable conclusions
Kaiser Family Foundation
• 83% of exchange enrollees receive subsidies, and 58% receive cost sharing subsidies
• 94% choose either a “Silver” or “Bronze” plan
• Subsidies shield lower income consumers from premium increases and overall costs more than higher income enrollees
• Individuals with incomes less than 100% of the federal poverty level are NOT eligible for subsidies on the exchanges
2626
Overview of the ACA (i.e. “Obamacare”)
Insurance Reform
Individual Exchanges
Medicaid Expansion
Overview of ACA Repeal
Agenda
7/7/17
14
27
MedicaidMedicaid is a complex federal / state partnership primarily focused on lower income workers
• Before the ACA, Medicaid has various roles in the American health care system
MedicaidMedicaid has federally specified mandated and optional coverage domains for states
- States have some flexibility to manage scope of coverage of benefits- With some exception, states must offer similar coverage to all residents
7/7/17
15
29
MedicaidMedicaid expenditures cover a variety of services
CY16: $558B
Long term care costs represent a substantial portion of costs
Many states provide payments to managed care organizations to facilitate their costs
30
MedicaidThe Affordable Care Act expanded Medicaid Eligibility and funding
• Income limits: broadened eligibility to nearly all adults up to 138% of the federal poverty level
• Some state have higher income limits for different populations
• No “Coverage Gap” – childless adults are now eligible for Medicaid coverage
• Increased Funding: Federal government subsidized 100% of cost of expansion for 3 years, 90% there after
• Standardized and simplified enrollment and outreach
• Still preserves state flexibility
7/7/17
16
31
MedicaidMedicaid has increased insurance coverage, but has only been expanded in a subset of states
Incremental ~18M patients enrolled in Medicaid / CHIP relative to pre-ACA
In states that have expanded Medicaid, there has been ~38% increase in enrollment
There is substantial state by state variation in enrollment changes- KY: >100%
enrollment increase- 22 states with
>25% enrollment increase
- VT: 4% increaseCMS 2017 Enrollment data; Kaiser Family Foundation; MACPAC.gov
32
MedicaidThe lack of expansion has created coverage gaps for low income workers
In states that have expanded Medicaid, all adults with income <400 of the federal poverty level are eligible for Medicaid or exchange subsidiesCMS 2017 Enrollment data; Kaiser Family Foundation
7/7/17
17
33
MedicaidIn states that have not expanded, ineligible adults are the population most at risk of being in the coverage gap
In states that have not expanded Medicaid, childless adults with income <100 of the federal poverty level are ineligible for exchange subsidies
CMS 2017 Enrollment data; Kaiser Family Foundation
34
MedicaidNotable conclusions
Kaiser Family Foundation
• Larger numbers of incrementally insured patients from Medicaid expansion than from Individual exchanges
• Large interstate variation in coverage gains between “expansion” and “non-expansion” states
• In non-expansion states, there is a coverage gap for adults making <100% of the federal poverty level
• Patient cost sharing (premiums, co pays, co-insurance total out of pocket) is limited
7/7/17
18
3535
Overview of the ACA (i.e. “Obamacare”)
Insurance Reform
Individual Exchanges
Medicaid Expansion
Overview of ACA Repeal
Agenda
36
ACARepeal
“No one ever knew that health care could be so complicated.”
- President Trump
7/7/17
19
37
ACARepealThe data presented in this section are based upon:
• The “Better Care Reconcilliation Act” which is the proposed legislation currently under discussion in the Senate
• Major Conclusions:• Total savings of $321Bn• Increased uninsured population by 22 million
• Implementation of changes occurs over 10 years
• Slides were made July 2017, and content is likely to change
• Conclusions are representative only! The full CBO report is 46 pages, and the following slides summarize selected highlights
38
ACARepealBroad contours of legislation
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA)• Expanding coverage: public insurance exchange, Medicaid expansion.
– Reduce subsidies for exchanges; Reverse the Medicaid expansion; limit future growth of Medicaid
• Financing: New taxes, reduced reimbursements to providers, individual mandate. – Reduce or eliminate taxes; Repeal the individual mandate tax
• Insurance Reform: Ban on preexisting conditions and lifetime limits; children covered to age 26; Essential health benefits; Individual mandate. – Grant states waiver for essential health benefits; change “individual
mandate” to a coninuous coverage requirement• Payment reform: pay for value initiatives, penalties for poor care.
– Not a major target• Delivery system reform: new models of care.
– Not a major target
7/7/17
20
39
ACARepealThe current Senate will fund a substantial tax cut by cutting insurance premium support and Medicaid growth
Bridge payments to insurers to stabilize the market
Innovation funds for States
Elimination of many of the ACA’s taxes, including the Medicare tax on high income earners
Delay of the “Cadillac Tax” on high cost insurance
Elimination of the employer and individual mandate penalties
Medicaid and premium subsidy cuts are the bulk of the savings in the senate proposal
- Insurers will not be allowed to discriminate on pre-existing conditions- Individual mandate repeal will potentially cause a large drop in insurance for younger
healthier patients- Continuous coverage: patient will be locked out of insurance for 6 months if they were
not continuously enrolled- Strong support in the Senate bill for states to develop and submit ACA waivers
7/7/17
21
41
Topic ACA – CurrentLaw BCRA– SenateProposal
INDIVIDUAL EXCHANGESAmount ofpremiumsubsidy
Basedonincomeandcomparable“Silver”plan - 70%AV
Changed.Basedonincome andcomparableplanwith58%AV
Income eligibilityforsubsidy
Available for100%to400%oftheFPL
Changed.Availableforenrolleesupto350%oftheFPL
CostSharingSubsidies
Available forpatients100%to250%oftheFPL
Eliminated.
ACARepeal
- Reduced premium subsidies will yield $408Bn in savings- Reduced premium subsidies à more patients will enroll in plans with lower actuarial
value plans OR will face increased premium costs for equivalent “Silver” plans- Higher out of pocket costs for:
- Patients in plans with lower actuarial values- Patients with income <250% of the FPL who are no longer eligible for cost
sharing subsidies- Expanded subsidies for people <100% of the FPL, but absent cost sharing subsidies
and lower premium support model, likely will have little impact on coverage
- Increase costs for states for newly eligible à limit further expansion, potentially threaten viability of current expansion
- Reduce future Medicaid expenditures from the federal government by $772Bn- Index Medicaid to consumer inflation after 2025, which is substantially lower than
historical inflation
7/7/17
22
43
ACARepealThe Senate proposal will phase in over time
Immediate: • Individual / Employer mandate• Medicare tax on high income earners• Changes to state based waiver
process
2018: • Health insurer funding for market
stabilization and growth
2019: • Continuous coverage requirement • State funding for innovation program• Age rating adjustment
2020• Premium subsidy adjustments• Elimination of cost sharing subsidies• Indexing future Medicaid growth on
per capita basis with varied inflation adjustments by Medicaid subpopulation
2021-2024: • Reductions in Medicaid matching
funding for the ACA expansion
2025: • Per capita Medicaid growth funding
adjusted to non-medical consumer price index (CPI-U) for all Medicaid beneficiaries
44
ACARepealNotable conclusions
Kaiser Family Foundation
• Substantial reductions in both Medicaid and individual markets, with a significant impact on lower income populations
• Medicaid is converted from an entitlement to a fixed cost program
• Bulk of the ACA regulatory and administrative framework remains intact, but the relaxed rules for state waivers could change this over time
7/7/17
23
45
Conclusions
Kaiser Family Foundation
• ACA has expanded coverage to millions of new consumers both through premium support and the Medicaid expansion
• Individual exchanges are plagued by increased premiums, but the current law limits financial impact of these costs to consumers eligible for subsidies
• Current proposals from the Senate and the House will• Reduce premium subsidies• Substantially curtail Medicaid growth• Cut many revenue streams that financed the ACA
• Current repeal proposals do not change the broader “volume to value” transition that was in part financed by the ACA and now embedded within MACRA