Top Banner
Unknown systematic errors and the method of least squares Michael Grabe alternative error model: true values and biases
23

Unknown systematic errors and the method of least squares Michael Grabe alternative error model: true values and biases.

Dec 18, 2015

Download

Documents

May Washington
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Unknown systematic errors and the method of least squares Michael Grabe alternative error model: true values and biases.

Unknown systematic errors and the method of least squares

Michael Grabe

alternative error model: true values and biases

Page 2: Unknown systematic errors and the method of least squares Michael Grabe alternative error model: true values and biases.

2

Quantity to be measured true value

Does metrology exist without a net of true values?

First Principle

Not likely!

Page 3: Unknown systematic errors and the method of least squares Michael Grabe alternative error model: true values and biases.

3

Impact of true values and biases

in least squares

Gauß-Markoff theorem

Assessment of uncertainties

Traceability

Key Comparisons

Page 4: Unknown systematic errors and the method of least squares Michael Grabe alternative error model: true values and biases.

4

xAβ

Least squares adjustment

mrmm

r

r

aaa

aaa

aaa

...

............

...

...

21

22221

11211

A

r

...2

1

β

mx

x

x

...2

1

xTraceability

Page 5: Unknown systematic errors and the method of least squares Michael Grabe alternative error model: true values and biases.

5

xAβ xAβ0

m

1iix

m1

β

n

1lili x

n1

x

Mean of means

averaging is permitted if and only if

the respective true values are identical

m

2

1

x

...

x

x

β

1

...

1

1

Page 6: Unknown systematic errors and the method of least squares Michael Grabe alternative error model: true values and biases.

6

mass

mg1kg0.25

mg1kg0.75

Adjustment ad hoc ?

Page 7: Unknown systematic errors and the method of least squares Michael Grabe alternative error model: true values and biases.

7

m

2

1

x

...

x

x

empirical variance-covariance matrix

A different approach

Page 8: Unknown systematic errors and the method of least squares Michael Grabe alternative error model: true values and biases.

8

m

1iii xwβ

Mean of means

Page 9: Unknown systematic errors and the method of least squares Michael Grabe alternative error model: true values and biases.

9

xAβ xAβ

m

2

1

x

...

x

x

x

Let the input data be arithmetic means

xAAAβ T1T

00 xAAAβ T1T

Page 10: Unknown systematic errors and the method of least squares Michael Grabe alternative error model: true values and biases.

10

Gauß-Markoff Theorem

The uncertainties are minimal...

...if the system has been weighted appropriately

Page 11: Unknown systematic errors and the method of least squares Michael Grabe alternative error model: true values and biases.

11

biases abolish the theorem ...

according to the GUM we should have

rmQE min rmQmin

but we encounter

Page 12: Unknown systematic errors and the method of least squares Michael Grabe alternative error model: true values and biases.

12

no more test of consistency

how to weight the system to

minimize uncertainties?

Consequences ...

Page 13: Unknown systematic errors and the method of least squares Michael Grabe alternative error model: true values and biases.

13

more ... and of utmost importance:

reduce measurement uncertainties

weightings

shift estimators and

Page 14: Unknown systematic errors and the method of least squares Michael Grabe alternative error model: true values and biases.

14

a picture

reduction

before after

shift

true value

Page 15: Unknown systematic errors and the method of least squares Michael Grabe alternative error model: true values and biases.

15

Traceability:

vary the weights by trial and error ...

Assessment of uncertainties

Page 16: Unknown systematic errors and the method of least squares Michael Grabe alternative error model: true values and biases.

16

Key Comparison

National Standards

1β 2β mβ...

true value

true valuetrue value

...

Page 17: Unknown systematic errors and the method of least squares Michael Grabe alternative error model: true values and biases.

17

Round Robin

Calibration of a Travelling Standard T

...(1)T (2)T (m)T

(1)β (2)β (m)β...

T

Page 18: Unknown systematic errors and the method of least squares Michael Grabe alternative error model: true values and biases.

18

Key comparisons do more ...

m1,...,i;βTd (i)i

and the differences

Consider the grand mean

(i)m

1iiTwβ

KCRV

Page 19: Unknown systematic errors and the method of least squares Michael Grabe alternative error model: true values and biases.

19

m

1jjs,jis,iis,

m

1j

Tijj

2i

Pd

fwf2wf

wswsw2sn

1ntu

i

βuTuu 2(i)2d i

„consistent“ with

and look forid

(i) uβT where

Page 20: Unknown systematic errors and the method of least squares Michael Grabe alternative error model: true values and biases.

20

Problem:

In some cases the GUM may localize the true value of the travelling standard, in others not ...

when

Should we test (i)T against β

(i)T constributes to β ?

Page 21: Unknown systematic errors and the method of least squares Michael Grabe alternative error model: true values and biases.

21

Differences between KCRV and individual calibrations

1du

2du

mdu

...(2)T

β

(m)T(1)T

true value

KCRV

Page 22: Unknown systematic errors and the method of least squares Michael Grabe alternative error model: true values and biases.

22

Individual Calibrations

a horizontal line should intersect each of the uncertainties

...(1)T

(2)T

(m)Ttrue value

Page 23: Unknown systematic errors and the method of least squares Michael Grabe alternative error model: true values and biases.

23

β KCRV

(1)T

(2)T

...(m)T

true value

KCRV and individual calibrations