Unjustified eiss2ification 536/83 In citatiotu of FoI file numbers, Ins lirst is FBISI, 1u5.62555, the second is isI hexico wity 105e37o2, oath oee Harvey Jewald titled. The subject is the ilexico City repert of 5/18/64. The _worksheets indicate more pages than the various messams. (Among the possible explanations is the withholding of what the FBI oalls administrative Dam.; from the Commis-ion.) In 5069 (1280) :;crzi.co City forecosts anost unimaptinsble :is-aster if its crpsrt is deciasoifind for and oublif-hed by the Cone MC is so paranoid it would not discuss the natter on the phone. Its fear is exactly that claimed in many FOIA cases and because of disclosure, tho fear is proven to be entinay unreasonable: "...publication would materially damage conceivohlof would result in the need tooeus' It also Xwould "destroy" the 4;.. ..ansew in establishing it." T17o worknheet shows dicosure in MHO general releases, 12/77 or 1/78. Copies not attached because copier not working. Serial for checking 3702 workaheete (section II) is 899. Bud had. VI first page of the 5/18/54 report is stamped "Sn0RET" but se of 7/14/77 i3 noted as "all paraixpahe are uoclasoified except where noted" by2040. Originally the typed ooper claims "Group I, Exckucled from Autwatic Downgrading and Declassi. fic*tion." 5195 (1294); - zerlects that the ropott . 150., and was made suitable for disclosure by FBIllq, There is extensive withholding within this record, some ridiculous, like "In view of extensive investigation conducted into the allegations of (withheld) and in light of the tenuous nature of his claims, it is deemed inadvisable to delete his identity. " With this telling 2040 in 1977 that the name had already been disclosed and published, he withholds it. This disclosure of classified illfornation, without any reported alterations in texts, from the relatively dmall percentage of FBI reports that involved I.Sexico City, is also reported in 5260 (13014), 5254 (1301B), 5281 (1301C), 5265 M0ID), 5271 (130410 and 5254 (1502A). Obviously, no harm resulted from disclosure. our operations in idexico and d thou aor.,plet-ay." of -,ources raid "years or work
15
Embed
Unjustified eiss2ification 536/83 In citatiotu of FoI file ...jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg Subject Index...Unjustified eiss2ification 536/83 In citatiotu of FoI file numbers, Ins
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Unjustified eiss2ification 536/83
In citatiotu of FoI file numbers, Ins lirst is FBISI, 1u5.62555, the second is isI hexico wity 105e37o2, oath oee Harvey Jewald titled. The subject is the ilexico City repert of 5/18/64. The _worksheets indicate more pages than the various messams. (Among the possible explanations is the withholding of what the FBI oalls administrative Dam.; from the Commis-ion.)
In 5069 (1280) :;crzi.co City forecosts anost unimaptinsble :is-aster if its crpsrt is deciasoifind for and oublif-hed by the Cone MC is so paranoid it would not discuss the natter on the phone. Its fear is exactly that claimed in many FOIA cases and because of disclosure, tho fear is proven to be entinay unreasonable:
"...publication would materially damage conceivohlof would result in the need tooeus'
It also Xwould "destroy" the 4;....ansew in establishing it."
T17o worknheet shows dicosure in MHO general releases, 12/77 or 1/78. Copies not attached because copier not working. Serial for checking 3702 workaheete (section II) is 899. Bud had.
VI first page of the 5/18/54 report is stamped "Sn0RET" but se of 7/14/77 i3 noted as "all paraixpahe are uoclasoified except where noted" by2040. Originally the typed ooper claims "Group I, Exckucled from Autwatic Downgrading and Declassi. fic*tion."
5195 (1294);-zerlects that the ropott .150., and was made suitable for disclosure by FBIllq, There is extensive withholding within this record, some ridiculous, like "In view of extensive investigation conducted into the allegations of (withheld) and in light of the tenuous nature of his claims, it is deemed inadvisable to delete his identity. " With this telling 2040 in 1977 that the name had already been disclosed and published, he withholds it.
This disclosure of classified illfornation, without any reported alterations in texts, from the relatively dmall percentage of FBI reports that involved I.Sexico City, is also reported in 5260 (13014), 5254 (1301B), 5281 (1301C), 5265 M0ID), 5271 (130410 and 5254 (1502A).
Obviously, no harm resulted from disclosure.
our operations in idexico and d thou aor.,plet-ay."
of -,ources raid "years or work
) v
L y Lenihan
nvq 7D7,77. (100-10401)
11/18/64
n:'Lrerter, 7717 (105-S2555)
7,77 7A7.V1777 orALn -
7e,-eP
IA W.14,en 7. Maack dated October 31, 1963, 1.if7%na,trof,apttoned tatter.
7Tryr the 1.rtf!errztsr,on r4f each office, referenced 01' 7.P., 7(.Nort ecellstfted. by the Bureau. Each,
ron!..es of ,51Ich report in its pooscasion.
7,04T~A (,7P7 ,n
77t/.rt. ronort of 777ectal Agent Taack as declassified tr*r Co' m.Commission- now intends to
!rr vm,T, datA to Its summary report on the
5?
- • -
r •
0 A
9 0
NAWO,
".")
r 4.0.4
woo
,„ (
70• " 1 Y !
nZ /01-379,07- a#57
. - •
SO, •ao. AC • e
. - re. • , "40. . ,„.
PCC,'
I ftl• 13G4 ' MM -3
1r)c,
A'! lory om, L LICTYPC //MIT
071:, ir,,,42%.7170 -13,01,8 • ...Zola
Ps.:1
- !kr. Leb,han
"AC, iisr,l90-1.0461)
11/16/04
177,1,1-ortnr, rtrr (105—T7555)
71AP.77,77 CrrAIP ',741
Ferro of .1.7"A John r. Fain dated July Z, 1,1451„ ,.t trt rITt!.ened %tatter, Maw tnformntlon t■f each
,,,, :w!,c.f7.„ referenced rrt ef Fain has been declassified by ef.f.ce nhould declassify copies of such
7,-,),rt, 1,r 1,t17,1 re)1.r,o.rtork. The Dallas Office should. notify 1",:ftee ef S10,r!A!, NCT Orleans, that tho
'1 1,30-Jpert, duclasstficd. Ina t, DI! 1- 1 :141
ebould 7. t ttrrttiort and NaturaitTation muc71 rcport INA2 been declassified,
"!.r,,,,u1rru.ch av ft cenr mucb report 'ern furntshed INS* Dallms„
C!.tr
7.reretzn %I.10.oton 171t
• ;4
7nstant rcpdrrt ef SA Pain was declassified when rp:e*rt thc Pros:tdent's Conts,o. Cr.Immission now intends
!YosN 131Ac report All back-up data to its summary report (rn te P';.71.SSATtAt10111.
4w.
rol_r rj9I t.
/
•
rfi
9
(4141 --
,
. Lenihan
roto. 104(1) 11/13/C4
n'lrectoY, 7777 (1n5-nn555)
7.77S TTARVr7 1:7)S7AU70
nerc7 nA
Jamer 7% Monty dated September 10, 1033, nt Tr..7rArl.
re,m ne information of each office, referenced
menert 7Oot7 'boon deciasgtfted by t lreau. Each nf7!. 771r7 ,(71711..f7 COr1..e.9 of trIch roport Au its pOsOrasiOn.
- rem (7'-',ertnr 77ire City
7 ;
T r.•tr.r.r•
'rrrt"..17 •
7rqtart roport fyr SA UortIrMME e.eClaSrled Waen we sent to tllo :tre_dertt's CommAsson. CommAsAon now intends to
:7.r on n.!4uftssAnat.lou. to llolAJ des.kgaated th.ts report !'lms been declassifieri.
•
Arc, /c770 07 - /301
r•-■ ""' • ' - -
11;
n
• _ r
- Lenihan
'P$ (OO-10461)
7PTT 112.5!55)
, °WAT))
11/16/64
ce SA .1611,1 T. Yairt dated .7/11y 10, 1152, at tn tiord vt ror !,:riformattort of
1..;%oh orop roforonoe0 report 73A 7.min has been declassified 1,1\tr,..au. Each offIco rho*Ild eec7.n.=,..Ity copy of such
t!9: oosr5eqnt'om. The 1all.; Off!.co shovild notify Nmvml !Ite?,.1.1.conionp Nor eTlomas, Bald the
: an d Naturmlizat!.on Service. nallaso Te=as, that le'r.12ort has been eeclasf.lIfted.
!odco /71.ty
r or,-; •••
77,77-7-
7artant r(Tr/rt onf SA !air was declassified when rent to ne Prosie.ent's Comminsion. Connivjion now intends
71f?7J17 57?e77!1 report as Int.c.X-up data to its summary rer,o,.rt on, t'h;e visqasstr.ation.
•
"7,07
rnMM-1111
• • •
Ir. • wow _
,r04.\ \•—
101 an•
• • Ir 019.16,0 •• (—• r
nVn
11.11,n IS. MO.( Or Ttrry?.1411' D
/3:7PC) . • , . . "*""•\. _ n "%ea •"',../* WIV"
no, "n•• — • -••••• •Sn''' • ,e` s". „r4nrn
!oi
1
- 1r •
ry
EC 30 .J
1 - R. E. nthan
r„Ac, rUa 1oo-*n4c1) 11/17/64
rectore 777 1.-.107,-S27.15,5)
7,177 T.TAr.TYY cc,Atr :T1
rer*T1 of rA John. T. ?win ditted Auzunt 30, ie62. n.t 7m11ac, 7070.:AV., tn enntioned matter.
Tor the trformntten of ench office, referoncod renort of 7A Fain h.ar hnen. eeetmestfiod by the Durcau, Etch
nhon".0 eccinelfr icorie!,7, of slych report tn. tte
Tr• 711Thn f.7ftten rOlonld notl!y thn Office of
Tntel1tenen, New n!..e117., the immtTration o.nd '+': 1=a1i7„rkt,„en, Serwtre. TeX.Wap thrtt such report Las heen ,linqcar;rtfted..
- 4ceat, .rn7teo Cttr
'1..7, mrtter r
7astlnt renert of nA Fain was declassified when sent to the 7res16ent's ComTctsston. Commtsston now intends to publish ech rei2ert an hark-vn eftta to tte summary report on the •tssA9riAmtAouk.
YrtY T Hrr -,V WOULD RE HANDLED "N SUCH A MANNER AS
nA"''.r W.) 7...'N.."AQ:-.".A'33%**N'T 70 THEM.
1r r 'fl< , Y1J! COULD WELL DESTROY THIS
PA,? Or V.T)Pvs. !!^,!NOLvr- D IN ESTASUSHING IT.
'r 7'r-iAT THE l':11. 2.EAU, IN ORDER TO FULFILL
7fl
2Pr.31flE%7 AND THE CT.IMISS!ONI, SHOULD
-" - STRoNGLY RECO7P7I1DFD THAT A SANITIZED
PflrPAP.ED, irPTTING THOSE PARTS WHICH
'2j- r"r 1 (2 1'.."-.2)LY OUR 09ERAT!ON3 HERE IF PUBLISHED.
7cfrr,pr
Ihr• 'kw...thief-nee eorrrtrinerri to the f111',1, 1 , r. .t1rtr 1. 11 tr/r re. to he thosernmarted outside the flutenzt, it io truggested that U be eeileght,
rntrhr cr.rentr tot totter- 5., er.r.tee! ...he r re rtrt‘ rr• try pi Orr n5P ,r V•VO
! 413
WW
1- W
AIM
-0 'F
P .13-54 i c L
4-77)
4,
Fi4 N44 .L
ZZ
.;_2
7-e
l-Ld
L
k: .
D: r,;
T:e ;Cmil rrY
p a c
ft4W
f- f
,,,,----...
..‘,.,,.............e,...7
2 0
1
I Ti L
-) 1,
c-
- D4-r,t
trig.,-_stVr40
v.
pesavd st e
e vt- i 014 of 43:1 t %kV
cATS DEPARTM.ENT OF JUSTICE
r ro,, lut 1. u v. EA it.! or INVESTIGATION
ASV It IC GTO!" 1S0 D. Co.
6 1964 F. A
LE, E MA R VE OS WALn •
N.
1!7T.CRET
Or !
7.yrlueed rrom AutomAtic 1)ownA7rAeinz And t*clAnsificatioin
7
,r 70 -
s% ;.2.111.1 Room - Nr. Stoken
10/12/04
'0n#7,tt7. Clty (10-3702)
rr.0.0,-tinr "77 r,:t.n7 Tt555) Trd
11, — l'rrx. ler 1' le"4"771r,k7dor•
— _ .
77/ 7./7'7:at runher S715 dated D/29 last and Iermt of emch of which im enclosed for
In,nr7onee r..ornmt are tttle page and 40 pnces of yoer 77v7t. ft in tit C*50 mophich have been amended • 7",::t,To or doltn.m.hlm .derlftastflention of your mummary
nercton of your nummary letterhead. 777 the nuwreAll on Xerox aquirmnt and, where
,vn,nr onricInn1 mramnny rere mti1ied ln the 40 nmf.:es encloned hnrcwith, when
mne„,ne the m.hn,r',h,hrinte pages in 'o!T clmninifioe letterhead, .• NI,nr7rtne Yereton fll.rnished to the nrestdont*e
revcrd that the 1.1nlorron eet forth
" 7;V:r,rr 1;7*,n7),T tnel%)1dIna 127 of 7rour cllInsified letter- inte rmgen 122 throvn.ht mne tnelnd!wing