Top Banner
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN January 28, 2010
341

UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

Jul 07, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

January 28, 2010

Page 2: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

2

Executive Summary Section 322 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act enacted under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 provided new and revitalized approaches to mitigation planning. Section 322 established a new requirement for Local Mitigation Plans, and authorized up to 7% of Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) funds available to a State to be used for development of State, Tribal, and Local Mitigation Plans. The new section emphasizes the need for State, Tribal, and Local entities to closely coordinate mitigation planning and implementation efforts. The most successful of these plans – where practical, meaningful mitigation actions have been the result – have two common elements:

• Comprehensive risk and capability assessments that form a solid foundation for decision-making; and

• Input from a wide range of stakeholders who would play a role during implementation of recommended mitigation actions at the Federal, State, and Local levels.

The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 emphasizes greater interaction between State and Local mitigation planning activities, and highlights the need for improved linkage of hazard and capability analyses to State and Local hazard mitigation strategies. Hazard mitigation is defined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as any action taken to eliminate or reduce the long-term risk to human life and

property from natural and technological hazards. Hazard mitigation is crucial to UK because of the exposure to many kinds of hazards and natural disaster events, in particular severe storm and flood. UK understands the need for improved information for decision-making in disaster planning. Recognizing that the impact and effects of most disaster events can be lessened by mitigation planning and preventative measures, this Hazard Mitigation Plan has been written to establish a guide for UK to identify cost effective mitigation measures, including reduction or avoidance, that can be taken to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk to human life and property from natural hazards. It is the result of a systematic evaluation of the nature and extent of vulnerability to the effects of natural hazards to UK and includes those actions needed to minimize future vulnerability to those hazards. This hazard mitigation planning document describes UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, and the unique elements of creating a risk assessment and vulnerability analysis for the campus that mirrors similar efforts in state and local hazards planning. The project has been a collaborative effort on the part of the practitioner unit on campus that is responsible for day-to-day emergency preparedness and safety (UK Emergency Management), UK Steering Committee and the Center for Hazards Research and Policy Development, a highly active research unit performing theoretical and applied hazards research projects at the local, regional, and national level.

Page 3: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

3

The UK Hazard Mitigation Plan (UKHMP) has incorporated university and local mitigation experiences, reviewed and listed a variety of mitigation projects, and examined the experiences of other universities, and local & state jurisdictions. It has taken advantage of the collective mitigation knowledge of many University, State, Federal, and Local officials, as well as representatives from both the public and private sectors, and is designed to help safeguard the UK campus community. This plan is designed to provide a blueprint for hazard mitigation activities in the general sense of the program and is structured to serve as a basis for specific hazard mitigation efforts for any disaster. It is recognized, however, that updates may be required to address specific issues arising from a given disaster. The plan identifies 13 natural hazards that could affect the university and cause physical and financial losses.

1. Dam Failure 2. Drought 3. Earthquake 4. Extreme Heat 5. Flood 6. Hailstorm 7. Karst/sinkhole 8. Mine Subsidence 9. Landslide 10. Severe Storm 11. Severe Winter Storm 12. Tornado 13. Wildfire

Planning Process The UKHMP was prepared by the Center for Hazards Research and Policy Development (CHR) at the University of Louisville, in close coordination with UK Office of Emergency Management (UKEM) and in cooperation with university stakeholders. UKEM identified stakeholders from over 20 university agencies as well as state and local government. Four Steering Committee meetings and 1 public meeting were held. Additionally, multiple face-to-face meetings and conference calls were held in order to gather information and input from members. The purpose of these meetings varied but the main objectives were to develop dialogue among the multiple agencies and to create the plan. Steering Committee members were key contributors to the development of the plan, not only through attendance at the meetings but also as providers of data and information used to develop the profile, risk assessment, mitigation strategy, and plan maintenance sections of the plan. A brief overview of the phases of the plan follows.

Page 4: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

4

Risk Assessment The process of Risk Assessment is divided into four sections. This will provide a comprehensive analysis and review for UK’s vulnerabilities.

• Identifying Hazards • Profiling Hazard Events • Assessing Vulnerability: Inventory Assets • Assessing Vulnerability: Estimating Potential

Losses Throughout the Risk Assessment section, maps are used whenever possible to convey where the spatial data and at-risk areas are located. The maps also provided a GIS visual tool for analysis for the Steering Committee and the viewers of the plan. The Vulnerability Assessment for the UKHMP was created with one main objective: assess the vulnerabilities of the main campus and non-campus assets to natural hazards. UK recognizes that the university is vulnerable to man-made hazards, but the scope of the vulnerability assessment and the UK Hazard Mitigation Plan per FEMA guidelines is to focus on natural hazards. In order to complete this task CHR decided to investigate the models created in the University of Louisville’s Hazard Mitigation Plan, Lexington Fayette Hazard Mitigation Plan and the State Hazard Mitigation Plan. These three models provided the pieces that facilitated the UKHMP vulnerability assessment model. The Vulnerability Assessment was broken into two sections: Main and Non-campus assets. Each section

provided difficult challenges. In order to develop a compressive overview of the non-campus assets a geo-referenced database was created for all 1132 assets owned by UK. This data was then overlaid on the state vulnerability data in order to determine each asset’s vulnerability. For the Main Campus model a detailed study was completed on each asset on the campus. It was discovered that the main campus area had very little vulnerability to any of the spatially defined hazards. For this reason CHR decided to complete an asset vulnerability model on the main campus assets. In developing a vulnerability assessment for a University, CHR developed a 3 pronged approach addressing the vulnerability assessment variables.

1. Population 2. Infrastructure 3. Research assets

Using the three pronged approach CHR further broke down the above-mentioned categories into five Elements at Risk Rank (ERR) variables. The ERR was created to portray the exposure element of any vulnerability model. This model based vulnerability on the assets that could be lost regardless of the hazard. Mitigation Strategy UK, through UKEM and in partnership with CHR, implemented a process for determining the appropriate mitigation goals and actions that can serve as a blueprint for reducing losses as identified in the risk

Page 5: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

5

assessment. At the third Steering Committee meeting, the Steering Committee developed the mitigation actions based on the pre-determined goals that were designed to be general hazard mitigation guidelines Establishing goals

: The mitigation goals were compiled by UKEM and distributed electronically through email to Steering Committee members for input. The mitigation goals were designed to be general guidelines of what is to be achieved. The goals are for the long-term and represent the overall vision of the mitigation plan.

Identification and Analysis of Mitigation Measures:

The hazard mitigation actions were developed at the third Steering Committee meeting. This section identifies, evaluates, and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions being considered to reduce the effects of each hazard identified in the Risk Assessment, with emphasis on new and/or existing buildings and infrastructure. These actions are based on the evaluation of the risk assessment by the Steering Committee and public comment.

Prioritization of Mitigation Actions:

The hazard mitigation actions were developed and prioritized by the Steering Committee. Planning for the actions included assigning departments responsible for administration and implementation, and a suggested timeframe.

Plan Maintenance Process This section describes the method and schedule of monitoring, evaluation, and updating the Mitigation Plan within a five-year cycle. When updated, the plan will be reviewed and revised, where appropriate, and

resubmitted to the State Hazard Mitigation Officer for initial review and on to FEMA Region IV for final approval. As appropriate, the plan also will be evaluated after a disaster, or after unexpected changes in land use or demographics in or near hazard areas.

Page 6: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

6

UK Hazard Mitigation Plan

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................... 9

1.1 OVERVIEW ........................................................ 9 1.2 THE CENTER FOR HAZARDS RESEARCH AND POLICY DEVELOPMENT ................................................. 9 1.3 CAMPUS PROFILE ........................................... 10

1.1.1 Introduction ............................................ 10 1.1.2 Campus Population & Occupancy ......... 12 1.1.3 Land Area and Geography .................... 14 1.1.4 Climate .................................................. 15

2 PREREQUISITES ................................................ 18

2.1 PLAN ADOPTION.............................................. 18

3 PLANNING PROCESS ....................................... 20

3.1 DOCUMENTATION OF THE PLANNING PROCESS .. 20 3.2 PUBLIC AND LOCAL AGENCY INVOLVEMENT ....... 22

3.2.1 Meetings ................................................ 24 3.3 INCORPORATION OF EXISTING PLANS ................ 28

4 RISK ASSESSMENT .......................................... 30

4.1 IDENTIFYING HAZARDS .................................... 30 4.1.1 Methodology .......................................... 30 4.1.2 Dam Failure ........................................... 31 4.1.3 Drought .................................................. 35 4.1.4 Earthquake ............................................ 37 4.1.5 Extreme Heat ........................................ 43 4.1.6 Flood ..................................................... 46 4.1.7 Hailstorm ............................................... 51 4.1.8 Karst/Sinkhole ....................................... 52 4.1.9 Mine Subsidence ................................... 55 4.1.10 Landslides ............................................. 57

4.1.11 Severe Storm ........................................ 60 4.1.12 Severe Winter Storm ............................. 63 4.1.13 Tornado ................................................. 65 4.1.14 Wildfire .................................................. 67

4.2 PAST PRESIDENTIAL DECLARATIONS ................ 72 4.3 PROFILES OF HAZARD EVENTS ......................... 76

4.3.1 Dam Failure ........................................... 78 4.3.2 Drought ................................................. 80 4.3.3 Earthquake ............................................ 83 4.3.4 Extreme Heat ........................................ 86 4.3.5 Flood ..................................................... 89 4.3.6 Hailstorm ............................................... 92 4.3.7 Karst/Sinkhole ....................................... 95 4.3.8 Landslide ............................................... 98 4.3.9 Mine Subsidence ................................. 100 4.3.10 Severe Storm ...................................... 102 4.3.11 Severe Winter Storm ........................... 105 4.3.12 Tornado ............................................... 108 4.3.13 Wildfire ................................................ 110

4.4 ANALYZING DEVELOPMENT TRENDS ............... 111 4.5 HAZARD PROBABILITY ................................... 114 4.6 ASSESSING VULNERABILITY ........................... 115

4.6.1 Dam Vulnerability Map .............................. 120 4.6.2 Drought Vulnerability Map ........................ 122 4.6.3 Earthquake Vulnerability Map ................... 124 4.6.4 Flood Vulnerability Map ............................ 126 4.6.5 Hail Vulnerability Map ............................... 128 4.6.6 Karst/Sinkhole Vulnerability Map .............. 130 4.6.7 Landslide Vulnerability Map ...................... 132 4.6.8 Mine Vulnerability Map ............................. 134 4.6.9 Severe Storm Vulnerability Map ............... 136 4.6.10 Tornado Vulnerability Map ...................... 138 4.6.11 Wildfire Vulnerability Map ....................... 140 4.6.12 Winter Storm Vulnerability Map .............. 142 4.6.13 Facility Age Vulnerability ......................... 147

Page 7: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

7

4.6.14 Facility Population Estimate Vulnerability148 4.6.15 Facility Research Value Vulnerability ...... 149 4.6.16 Facility Critical Facilities Vulnerability ..... 150 4.6.17 Facility Replacement Cost Vulnerability .. 151

4.7 ASSESSING VULNERABILITY: LOSS ESTIMATION .... 152

5 MITIGATION STRATEGY ................................. 154

5.1 LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION GOALS ................ 154 5.2 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF MITIGATION ACTIONS ................................................................. 155 5.3 IMPLEMENTATION OF MITIGATION ACTIONS ...... 156

5.3.1 Prioritization of Mitigation Actions ........ 156 5.3.2 Cost-Benefit Review ............................ 157

6 UK PLAN MAINTENANCE ............................... 165

6.1 MONITORING, EVALUATING, AND UPDATING THE PLAN 165 6.2 INCORPORATION INTO EXISTING PLANNING MECHANISMS .......................................................... 166 6.3 CONTINUED PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ................. 169

7 REFERENCES .................................................. 171

8 APPENDICES ................................................... 174

APPENDIX 1: ADOPTING LEGISLATION ....................... 174 APPENDIX 2: INVITATION – STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING 1 .............................................................. 190 APPENDIX 3: STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING ATTENDANCE .......................................................... 191 APPENDIX 4: MEETING AGENDAS AND NOTES ............ 193 APPENDIX 5: FLYER FOR DRAFT PLAN FEEDBACK ...... 205 APPENDIX 6: ONLINE PUBLIC MEETING ANNOUNCEMENT .............................................................................. 206 APPENDIX 7: PUBLIC MEETING AGENDA .................... 207 APPENDIX 8: HAZARD RANKING WORKSHEET AND RESULTS ................................................................. 208

APPENDIX 9: STATUS OF DAMS IN KENTUCKY BY COUNTY .............................................................................. 210 APPENDIX 10: ASSET HAZARD VULNERABILITY CHART .............................................................................. 213 APPENDIX 11: FACILITY AGE ELEMENTS AT RISK RANK TABLE ..................................................................... 273 APPENDIX 12: FACILITY POPULATION ESTIMATE ELEMENTS AT RISK RANK TABLE ............................... 287 APPENDIX 13: FACILITY RESEARCH VALUE ELEMENTS AT RISK RANK TABLE .................................................... 302 APPENDIX 14: FACILITY CRITICAL FACILITIES ELEMENTS AT RISK RANK TABLE ............................................... 316 APPENDIX 15: FACILITY REPLACEMENT COST ELEMENTS AT RISK RANK ......................................................... 318 TABLE ..................................................................... 318 APPENDIX 16: SAMPLE MITIGATION ACTION FORM AND HANDOUTS .............................................................. 333 APPENDIX 17: ANNUAL SUMMARY REPORT ............... 339 APPENDIX 18: PROGRESS REPORT .......................... 340 APPENDIX 19: AMENDMENT FORM ............................ 341

Page 8: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

INTRODUCTION

ap Table nts

Page 9: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

9

1 Introduction

1.1 Overview The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000, signed into law in October 2000, requires that all local communities undertake a planning process to identify and reduce vulnerability to losses from natural hazards such as flooding, tornadoes and earthquakes. The resulting mandatory local mitigation plan requires active participation by federal, state, regional and local agencies as well as interested private entities. This mitigation plan demonstrates UK’s commitment to reducing the risks from natural hazards, and should serve as a guide for all levels of university decision makers. This plan details how UK will address planning for natural hazards and the resources they are going to commit to the process. The UKHMP includes the following basic requirements:

• A Mitigation Strategy based on local vulnerability, analyses and risk assessments.

• Coordination with state and regional mitigation planning efforts.

• Funding or technical assistance available to local governments.

• Prioritization of local areas that will receive mitigation planning and other assistance.

• Formal plan maintenance process.

In summary, the UKHMP seeks to provide the overall guidance to weave together the planning efforts of all university and local agencies, private and non-profit

organizations into one viable, comprehensive, university mitigation program. 1.2 The Center for Hazards Research and

Policy Development The UKHMP was developed through a partnership and Memorandum of Agreement between the University of Kentucky Office of Emergency Management (UKEM) and the University of Louisville, Center for Hazards Research and Policy Development (CHR). The Center for Hazards Research and Policy Development is a Board of Trustees-recognized research unit at the University of Louisville, and was established in 1989. Under the Direction of Dr. David Simpson, the Center has performed practitioner-oriented contracts and theoretical research in all phases and aspects of hazards, disasters, and homeland security issues, including work for the National Science Foundation, the United Nations, and various state and local governments. The UKHMP, its development, analysis and process, has been managed by Josh Human, the Center’s Project Manager. Graduate students, primarily those enrolled in the Master’s of Urban Planning, have been the real engine for the work in the plan, and it would not have been possible to do the plan without their dedication and hard work. All of the following students have made significant contributions to this document: Andrea Pompei, Adam King, Nate Moulder, and Mike Clust.

Page 10: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

10

1.3 Campus Profile 1.1.1 Introduction UK is a public, research-extensive, land grant university. According to the 2008-2009 Fact Booklet, UK occupies a total of 24,998 acres of land and space in the state of Kentucky. The main campus is located on 795 acres of land and is located in the City of Lexington which is in central Fayette County. The University also has land and space off-campus that is located in every county of Kentucky, totaling 24,203 acres. According to the University Archives, UK was established by the state of Kentucky in 1865 as the Agricultural and Mechanical College of the Kentucky University. The Kentucky University had been established in Harrodsburg in 1858 and in 1865 merged with Transylvania University, which was established in Lexington in 1783. Substantial initial funding was provided by the U.S. government through the Morrill Act, which created the land grant colleges. In 1878 the state separated the Agricultural and Mechanical College from Kentucky University and the next year established the Agricultural and Mechanical College of Kentucky. The city of Lexington provided additional funding and donated the City Park for use as a campus. In 1916, the State University was renamed the University of Kentucky. By 1918, there were 27 buildings located on the main-campus grounds of UK (see map of Buildings & Grounds of UK, 1918). According to information received from the UK Physical Plant Department, today there are 336 buildings on the

main-campus. Seven facilities are currently in construction or renovation and six facilities are in planning and design. Figure 1. Building & Grounds of UK, 1918

Buildings & Grounds of UK, 1918 Source: UK Special Collections and Digital Programs, http://www.uky.edu/Libraries/libpage.php?lweb_id=480&llib_id=13 UK has more than 70 programs that are nationally ranked. Fifteen programs are already ranked in the Top 20 for public research programs. Over 200 majors are offered, with special programs in diplomacy, honors, the humanities and several inter-disciplinary areas of study.

Page 11: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

11

Page 12: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

12

1.1.2 Campus Population & Occupancy The population of a university community is its greatest asset. Hence for mitigation activities to be successful, one must entirely understand the size and distribution of the population. The university has population in the form of students who live on campus in the many resident halls, as well as students who live off campus but close to campus. This immediate neighborhood around the university and its population must also be considered. The UK Campus Community must be educated about the mitigation activities of the university. For this the university must take steps to train the community of its responsibilities during and after a major emergency. According to the UK Fact Booklet for 2008-2009, the fall 2008 headcount for total university enrollment was 26,913. This number includes undergraduate, graduate, first professional, UG Non-degree, postdoctoral, and house staff. 20,355 or 75.6% of the 26,913 enrolled are in-state and the remaining 6,558 are out-of-state. The table to the right provides a more detailed breakdown of the student body. The 26,913 total students are categorized into seventeen different schools – Agriculture, Arts & Sciences, Business & Economics, Communications & Information Studies, Dentistry, Design, Education, Engineering, Fine Arts, Graduate School, Health Sciences, Law,

Figure 2. UK Enrollment* Fall 2008 at a Glance

Men

% of Total 12,958 48.1

Women 13,955 51.9 Total 26,913 100.0 Full-time 22,689 88.0 Part-time 3,224 12.0 Total 26,913 100.0 Resident 20,355 75.6 Non-Resident 6,558 24.0 Total 26,913 100.0 Undergraduate 18,988 70.6 Graduate 5,554 20.6 First Professional 1,558 5.8 UG Non-degree 397 1.5 Postdoctoral 813 3.0 House Staff 813 3.0 Total (CPE) 26,913 100.0

Source: UK Fact Booklet 2008-2009

Page 13: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

13

Medicine, Nursing, Pharmacy, Public Health, and Social Work. There are 11,718 full-time employees at UK. 1,997 full-time employees are categorized as faculty and the remaining full-time employees are categorized as executive/administrative/managerial, library faculty, other professional, secretarial / clerical, technical/paraprofessional, skilled crafts, and service/maintenance. The university operates at a total budget for 2008-09 of $2.205 billion. Typically, classes run until 9 p.m. on all weekdays with the exception of Fridays when they run until 8 p.m. Hence, classrooms can be expected to remain occupied from 8:00 a.m. until 8:00 p.m. on weekdays. During the night Residence Halls are the most populated amongst all other buildings on campus. See Section 4.6.14 for a map showing the population estimate for main campus facilities.

Page 14: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

14

1.1.3 Land Area and Geography According to the UK Fact Booklet 2008-2009, total land and space acreage for UK is 24,998 acres. The main campus is 3% of the total acreage while the remaining 97% of acreage is located off campus. 78% of the total assignable square footage in buildings is located on the main campus while 22% is located off campus. Main Campus UK's 795 acre main campus is located just south of downtown Lexington, Kentucky. Campus is divided roughly into three parts. North campus contains primarily residence halls and UK HealthCare Good Samaritan Hospital. Central campus is home to two residence halls, Greek housing, classrooms and offices, the W. T. Young Library, the Lucille Little Fine Arts Library, and the King Library. South campus contains additional residence halls, athletic and recreational facilities, UK HealthCare Chandler Medical Center complex, and the College of Agriculture. Non-Campus Facilities 97% of the land obtained by UK is located off campus. This land includes research farms, the Robinson Forest, substations, 4-H camps, Adena Park, Agricultural Extension Offices, and other medical and research facilities.

Figure 3. Land and Space

2008-2009

Main Campus

Off Campus**

Acreage Total

795 24,203 24,998 Assignable Square Footage in Buildings Classroom 241,966 30,700 272,666 Laboratory 1,197,101 159,923 1,357,024 Office 1,686,083 933,754 2,619,837 Study 410,443 5,678 416,121 Special 738,107 594,511 1,332,618 General 694,726 95,253 789,979 Support 2,151,373 327,487 2,478,860 Health Care 465,582 58,502 524,084 Residential 1,269,667 185,040 1,454,707 Unclassified 63,363 147,261 210,624 Total 8,918,411 2,538,109 11,456,520

Source: UK Fact Booklet 2008-2009

Page 15: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

15

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Degr

ees

(Far

enhe

it)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Inch

es

1.1.4 Climate Main Campus UK’s main campus is located within Lexington-Fayette County. Climatic information was gathered for Lexington-Fayette County from the LFUCG Hazard Mitigation Plan to create a climatic profile for the UK campus. Monthly average temperatures in Lexington-Fayette County range from a high of 76.2 degrees in July to a low of 32.1 degrees in January. The area has a moderate climate, characterized by warm, moist conditions. Summers are usually warm, and winters cool. Much of the County’s average annual 45.9 inches of precipitation falls in the spring. Storms happen year-round; however most storms occur between March and September.

Figure 4. Average Annual Temp Source: Climatic Data Center Figure 5. Average Annual Precipitation Source: Climatic Data Center

Page 16: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

16

Figure 6. Normal Climate and Average Weather in Lexington-Fayette, Kentucky

Source: www.city-data.com Non-Campus Facilities UK Non-Campus Facilities are located at various locations throughout the state of Kentucky. UK Non-Campus Facilities include Agricultural Extension Offices, medical, health, and other research facilities. UK Agricultural Extension Offices are located in each of the 120 counties in the state of Kentucky. For the purpose of gathering climatic data for Non-Campus Facilities, data from the recently approved 2007 Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan is provided. According to the Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan, Kentucky has a temperate climate. The mean annual temperature ranges from 52° F in the northeast to 58° F in the southwest. January is the coldest month

and July is the warmest. Annual precipitation averages about 45 inches, ranging from about 40 inches in the north at Covington, to 53 inches in south central Kentucky. Snowfall is limited in many sections of the state. Annually, it ranges from 5 to 10 inches in the southwestern sections to 25 inches in the northeastern sections and to 40 inches at higher elevations in the southeastern section of the state.

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec High temperature (°F) 40.2 45.5 55.6 65.4 74.3 82.5 86.1 84.9 78.4 67.3 54.9 44.6 Low temperature (°F) 24.1 27.5 35.7 43.9 53.4 62.1 66.3 64.7 57.7 46.2 37.2 28.4 Days with precipitation 12 11 13 12 12 11 11 9 8 8 11 12 Wind speed (mph) 10.5 10.5 10.8 10.4 8.6 7.9 7.2 6.8 7.6 8.1 9.8 10.2 Morning humidity (%) 81 79 77 76 81 84 86 88 88 85 81 81 Afternoon humidity (%) 69 64 58 55 58 58 59 59 58 57 63 68 Sunshine (%) 39 46 50 56 59 65 65 65 63 59 43 38 Days clear of clouds 6 6 6 6 7 7 8 9 10 12 7 6 Partly cloudy days 6 6 7 9 10 12 12 12 8 7 7 6 Cloudy days 20 17 18 15 14 11 11 10 11 12 17 19 Snowfall (in) 5.8 4.7 2.7 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 1.9

Page 17: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

PREREQUISITES

Page 18: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

18

2 Prerequisites

2.1 Plan Adoption Requirement §201.6(c)(5): [The local hazard mitigation plan shall include] documentation that the plan has been formally adopted by the governing body of the jurisdiction requesting approval of the plan (e.g., City Council, County Commissioner, Tribal Council). The University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan (UKHMP) was formally adopted on October 27, 2009 by the University Board of Trustees. The University Board of Trustees is recognized as the governing body for the University (See Appendix 1 for Governing Regulations). The endorsement of the Plan was officially achieved at the October 27, 2009 Meeting of the Board of Trustees at the University Kentucky 18th Floor Patterson Office Tower (See Appendix 1 for Agenda, Board of Trustee Minutes and Adoption Resolution). The Board of Trustee meetings are open to the public and public comments were welcome during the adoption meeting. The endorsement of this plan demonstrates the University of Kentucky’s commitment to fulfilling the mitigation goals and actions outlined in the plan. It also legitimizes the plan and authorizes the responsible agencies identified in the plan to execute their responsibilities.

Page 19: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

PLANNING PROCESS

Page 20: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

20

3 Planning Process

3.1 Documentation of the Planning Process Requirement §201.6(c)(1): [The plan shall document] the planning process used to develop the plan, including how it was prepared, who was involved in the process, and how the public was involved. The UKHMP was prepared by The Center for Hazards Research and Policy Development (CHR) at the University of Louisville, under the direction of the UK Office of Emergency Management (UKEM), and in cooperation with all stakeholders in the process. The plan has been developed jointly by the University of Louisville team comprised of Dr. David Simpson, Director of CHR; Josh Human, Project Manager; Christy L. Giles, Director of UKEM; Therese Yeiser Smith, Emergency Management Specialist of UKEM; and graduate research assistants Andrea Pompei, Adam Clayton King, and Nate Moulder. The planning process began in October of 2007 and CHR organized the process in the following manner:

Step 1 – Organization of Resources Step 2 – Risk Assessment Step 3 – Mitigation Strategy Step 4 – Establish Plan Maintenance Procedures Step 5 – Plan Approval

The planning process in theory is linear, but in practice became a series of iterations as the planning team worked to design a system that accommodated an

exceedingly broad-based mitigation process. As existing programs were identified and new ideas and recommendations generated, each step had to be re-evaluated for sufficient information and direction to accommodate new information. The following is an overview of the planning process employed by CHR and UKEM.

1. Organization of Resources The organization of resources included the review of current local and state mitigation plans, university reports and manuals, and other strategies and analyses of the potential natural hazards significant to the area. Key stakeholders were identified and organized into a steering committee. This was conducted by UKEM staff in conjunction with the CHR staff and the list was reviewed by the Director of UKEM for approval. At this time, the planning area was determined for UK as encompassing main-campus and non-campus facilities. These two categories of UK facilities fall under one jurisdiction: UK.

2. Risk Assessment

The risk assessment provides a factual basis for activities proposed in the plan by identifying the hazards affecting UK, profiling the history of these hazards, creating an inventory of assets, and estimating potential losses. This step involved the identification, compilation and integration of the existing hazard databases throughout UK into one managed University-level database that provided the necessary information for the steering committee to examine past occurrences of hazards, assess

Page 21: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

21

probabilities, and develop appropriate mitigation strategies. CHR spent considerable time identifying and profiling the primary hazard events that are significant to UK. Once the hazards were identified, vulnerability was assessed for each critical facility located on UK’s main campus and, to our best ability, for Non-Campus Facilities located throughout the state, from identified resources. For future plan updates, an improved inventory of non-campus facilities will allow for better assessments of vulnerability.

3. Mitigation Strategy

This section included the drafting of hazard mitigation goals and actions by the steering committee. The mitigation strategy was based on the review of the risk assessment process and feedback provided during the steering committee and public meetings. UKEM, the Steering Committee and the CHR team then worked to assess UK’s current capabilities in order to create a viable mitigation strategy. The mitigation strategy contains well-focused goals and actions that are clearly described to show that the benefits will exceed the necessary expenditures. A mitigation strategy matrix was developed to define responsibilities and project a timeline for implementation for each mitigation action.

4. Establish Plan Maintenance Procedures

The steering committee, UKEM, and CHR team worked to develop a strategy for plan maintenance that includes implementation,

monitoring, evaluation, and updating of the plan. The plan maintenance section also describes the process by which the plan will be incorporated into other planning mechanisms, and how the public and the UK Community will continue participation in the plan maintenance process.

5. Plan Approval

The formal adoption of the plan makes it an official document of UK and demonstrates to other jurisdictions and future officials that this document is to be used to guide the actions of UK. UK obtained agency endorsements of the mitigation plan and this plan was adopted by UK, including its Non-Campus Facilities.

Page 22: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

22

3.2 Public and Local Agency Involvement Requirement §201.6(b): In order to develop a more comprehensive approach to reducing the effects of natural disasters, the planning process shall include:

(1) An opportunity for the public to comment on the plan during the drafting stage and prior to plan approval;

(2) An opportunity for neighboring communities, local and regional agencies involved in hazard mitigation activities, and agencies that have the authority to regulate development, as well as businesses, academia and other private and non-profit interests to be involved in the planning process; and

In an effort to develop a more comprehensive approach to reducing hazard effects, the planning process provided an opportunity for involvement by representatives of local and regional agencies involved in hazard mitigation activities, representatives of various UK departments that will have the authority to regulate development, as well as representatives of other public, private, and nonprofit entities. The first step of determining public and local agency involvement was identifying potential stakeholders to be involved in the process. After UKEM identified potential local stakeholders, the Director of UKEM, Christy Giles, sent a formal invitation through Microsoft Outlook for the first Steering Committee meeting (see Appendix 2 for meeting invite). The invitation was sent to

stakeholders from over 20 university and local agencies. The invitation provided information regarding the UK hazard mitigation planning effort and also introduced potential Steering Committee members to the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000). Below is a listing of the original invitees for the first Steering Committee Meeting: Figure 7. Steering Committee Meeting Invitees Name Department

Linus Walton Agriculture Russ Pear Athletics Sarah Nikirk Auxiliary Services Anthany Beatty AVP for Campus Services Jack Applegate Campus Physical Plant

Division (CPPD) John Zachem CPPD David Kasier CPPD Michelle Ellington CPPD Andrew Blues CPPD Dall Clark Capital Project Management

(CPM) Joe Crouch CPM Paul Warner College of Agriculture –

Extension Bill Peterson College of Agriculture –

Farms Ann Thomas College of Medicine Daryoush Marefat Communications Tony Blanton Dean of Students David Hibbard Environmental Health and

Safety Bob Wiseman EVP for Facilities Garey Hunt Good Samaritan Hospital Pat Imerman Good Samaritan Hospital Emily Frank Hazard Mitigation Grants

Page 23: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

23

Name Department

Program Brenda Stamper Housing Kim Wilson Human Resources Mary Ferlan Human Resources Jack Wireman Kentucky Clinic Camille Crain Kentucky Emergency

Management Doreen Birkholz Lexington Fayette Urban

County Government Department of Emergency Management (LFUCG DEM)

Pat Dugger LFUCG DEM Ed McClure Medical Center Physical

Plant Division Christy Giles UKEM Therese Smith UKEM Dana Macaulay Office of Residence Life Jim Wims Office of Residence Life Don Thornton Parking and Transportation

Services Stuart Kearns Parking and Transportation

Services Kathryn Brinegar Plant Assets Richard Greissman Provost Wayne Ritchie Provost Christine O-Brien Real Properties Lou Drapeau Risk Management Larry Crouch Student Affairs Pat Terrell Student Affairs Victor Hazard Student Affairs Garry Beach UK Fire Marshal Greg Williamson UK Fire Marshal Murray Clark UK Hospital Doyle Friskney UK IT Sharon Berry UK Medical Center Safety

Officer

Name Department

Joe Monroe UK Police Department James Tracy VP for Research Lance Broeking VP’s Office for Campus

Services During the planning process, four Steering Committee meetings and one public meeting (five meetings total) were held to engage the Steering Committee and any interested parties. The purpose of these meetings varied, but the main objective was the development of dialogue among the multiple agencies throughout UK and other agencies who deal with natural hazards and their effects.

The following agencies were key contributors to the development of the Plan, demonstrated not only by attendance at the Steering Committee and public meetings, but also in their role as active providers of data and information to assist with the development of the profiles and risk assessments as needed by the CHR team:

• Good Samaritan Hospital • Kentucky Emergency Management (KYEM) • Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government,

Division of Emergency Management (LFUCG DEM)

• UK Athletics • UK Auxiliary Services • UK Campus Physical Plant Division • UK Capital Project Management • UK College of Agriculture • UK Communications

Page 24: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

24

• UK Environmental Health & Safety • UK Hazard Mitigation Grants Program • UK Human Resources • UK Medical Center Physical Plant Division • UK Office for Campus Services • UK Office of Emergency Management (UKEM) • UK Office of Residential Life • UK Parking and Transportation Services • UK Police & Fire Department • UK Provost • UK Real Properties • UK Risk Management • UK Student Affairs • UK College of Medicine

In addition to the five Steering Committee and public meetings that were held for stakeholder input, ten other meetings were held either face-to-face or by telephone between CHR and various members of the Steering Committee. The additional 10 meetings were held for planning and coordination of the planning process, and data collection for the risk assessment. The Steering Committee members were also provided an opportunity to submit data, existing plans, manuals, and any relevant mitigation planning documents pertinent to the development of the UKHMP. To ease the task of submitting large files via email and assist with the coordination efforts among university, local agencies, and the CHR planning team, a File Transfer Protocol (FTP) site was established at the University of Louisville accessible via login and password. For uploading information, the CHR staff created an FTP tutorial on PowerPoint for the Steering Committee

which provided step-by-step instructions on how to transfer data and eased the process of working with the site. An FTP site creates a way to quickly upload and download files on the Internet. The FTP site can store a number of files and runs an FTP server application that waits for transfer requests. Once on the site the user may copy files and upload data using a windows “explorer” type interface. The FTP site has proven to be a valuable asset in transferring Geographic Information System (GIS) -related files and large documents for all of the users involved in the mitigation planning process. The FTP site will continue to be accessible to those involved in the planning process, and managed by CHR, where it will be used to coordinate data transfers for plans that are not currently complete, as well as future mitigation projects. 3.2.1 Meetings CHR conducted four meetings with the Steering Committee and one public forum which allowed an interactive feedback process to take place among all of the representatives of university, local agencies and interested parties. The Steering Committee meetings are described in more detail below. Also, see Appendix 3 for Steering Committee Meeting Attendance and Appendix 4 for Steering Committee Meeting Agendas and Notes. Meeting I: Steering Committee Date: November 2, 2007

Page 25: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

25

The main purpose of the first Steering Committee meeting was to give an overview of the hazard mitigation process and to work with stakeholders to determine data needs and availability. The meeting began with welcome and introductory comments by Christy Giles, Director of UKEM. The introduction was followed by an overview of hazard mitigation planning by Josh Human, Project Manager of CHR. Camille Crain, State Hazard Mitigation Officer for KYEM then gave a presentation on state hazard mitigation planning that is taking place in Kentucky. Josh Human spoke again about the information and data needs for the hazard mitigation plan. Finally, the Steering Committee was divided into groups for a break-out session. A “break-out session” is a structured brainstorming activity and is an efficient way of gathering more information from the Steering Committee meeting attendees. The 29 attendees (including UKEM) were split up into three groups each led by a member of the CHR staff. The meeting participants engaged in a dialogue that discussed key hazards that affect UK. Stakeholders identified the types of applicable data their respective agencies maintain and made arrangements to transfer needed data to CHR. Types of hazard-related data and information offered by the stakeholders included GIS files, excel databases, official reports, plans, surveys, and past hazard information.

Responses were recorded and the data was gathered, streamlined and incorporated into the Plan.

Meeting II: Steering Committee Date: April 18, 2008 The second steering committee meeting was held to follow-up on the hazard data collection, inform committee members of the risk assessment process, and finally to identify critical facilities to UK. Christy Giles, Director of UKEM gave a welcome to the Steering Committee. Next, Andrew Blues, Information Technology Manager, and Michelle Ellington, GIS Analyst, from UK Campus Physical Plant Division (CPPD) presented on Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and building UK’s GIS database. The presentation by PPD informed Steering Committee members of the benefits to have a GIS database for their prospective agencies and departments. Making steering committee members aware of mapping capabilities is relevant to the UK Hazard Mitigation Plan, as CHR essentially used similar GIS technologies in order to complete the risk assessment. Josh Human, Associate Director of CHR then presented on the risk assessment phase and displayed several maps that had been created based on the data that members of the Steering Committee provided to CHR. In order to complete the risk assessment, the Steering Committee needed to identify buildings that can be characterized as critical facilities to the university. The Steering Committee members were presented with a list that was created by staff at UKEM. They were given a few minutes to look over the list by themselves or with a partner and prioritize the most critical facilities. Finally, a discussion with the Steering Committee

Page 26: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

26

members was led by Josh Human to reach a consensus on the most critical facilities. From this discussion, members also were able to mold a definition for “critical facility” that was tailored to UK. Meeting III: Steering Committee Date: November 19, 2008 The third steering committee meeting was held to provide an overview of the risk assessment and to develop mitigation strategies. Christy Giles, Director of UKEM gave a welcome to the Steering Committee and emphasized the importance of the mitigation strategy process in identifying much need mitigation actions for UK. Next, Josh Human, Associate Director of CHR gave a PowerPoint presentation to show the results of the risk assessment. These results included maps that had been created for the vulnerability assessment as well as hazard profile information on historic hazard events that had affected UK. Then after a short break, Josh continued the presentation and talked about the purpose of the mitigation strategy section of the plan. Prior to this meeting, UKEM distributed via email “UK Hazard Mitigation Action Report” forms to the Steering Committee members. This form was developed to gather information on existing hazard mitigation projects at UK and inform the mitigation strategies section of the plan. The Steering Committee members returned the completed forms to UKEM and CHR via email. The information from each completed action form was used to build a mitigation action matrix. This

preliminary draft matrix was presented to the Steering Committee members for review, and to make additions and/or changes at this meeting. To supplement the preliminary draft action matrix, the steering committee members were provided with two handouts to assist in making additions and/or changes to the matrix: 1. Mitigation Action Categories and Techniques and 2. Sample Mitigation Action Strategies. These handouts were provided to encourage the committee to brainstorm strategies that would be suitable for UK. After going through each mitigation action category (prevention, property protection, public information and awareness, natural resource protection, emergency services, and structural projects), the steering committee developed 32 mitigation actions to contribute to the plan. Meeting IV: Steering Committee Date: March 13, 2009 The fourth Steering Committee Meeting had 20 attendees, and was held to introduce the draft plan document and to solicit feedback from the online draft plan document which was available on CHR’s website. Christy Giles, Director of UKEM gave a welcome to the Steering Committee and emphasized that the results of the plan have already been seen. Since the identification of the mitigation strategies, a funding opportunity was made available for an action project. Additionally, UKEM has already taken initiative in identifying three additional mitigation action projects to add to the plan following the recent January ice storm of 2009 bringing the total number of action items to 35.

Page 27: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

27

The presentation to introduce the draft plan was given by Josh Human, Project Manager for CHR and Andrea Pompei, Graduate Research Assistant for CHR. Josh began the presentation by giving an overview of the benefits of DMA 2000 and the importance of developing a hazard mitigation plan in order to be eligible for funding. Following this overview, Andrea Pompei took the Steering Committee through the steps of the Planning Process emphasizing that over 60 people have been involved representing 40 different agencies, and over 10 individual meetings have taken place. Josh Human then provided an introduction to the Risk Assessment that would appear on the draft document. He expressed the difficulty in building a vulnerability profile for the risk assessment due to the limited historic hazard event information on UK’s main campus and non-campus facilities. A Steering Committee member pointed out that one of the road names on the main campus map was incorrect and should be corrected. Andrea Pompei then provided a recap of the Mitigation Strategy that was developed by the Steering Committee meeting at the previous meeting. She went over the goals and actions that were determined and explained the process for determining the prioritization and benefit-cost analysis for the mitigation actions. The benefit-cost analysis was done in a qualitative manner, due to the limited amount of information on each action item. She stressed that once UK is ready to examine each project in more detail, a true benefit-cost analysis can be conducted.

Josh Human then went over the Plan Maintenance section of the plan. He explained that the plan would need to be updated in five years after its first approval. UKEM will be the responsible agency for facilitating the plan maintenance among the Steering Committee members. Lastly, the Steering Committee was encouraged to provide their feedback by April 1st. They were provided with a flyer that showed the website location for the draft plan document, date of availability for review, and Andrea Pompei’s contact information for feedback (see Appendix 5). Meeting V: Public Meeting Date: March 13, 2009 A Public meeting was held from 12:00-1:00 p.m. following the Steering Committee meeting. This meeting was held to provide a forum for the public to provide comments and suggestions for the draft plan document and to inform them of the draft plan document availability for review on Wednesday, March 18th. See Appendix 6 and 7 for the Public Meeting Agenda and online public meeting announcement. .

Page 28: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

28

3.3 Incorporation of Existing Plans Requirement §201.6(b): In order to develop a more comprehensive approach to reducing the effects of natural disasters, the planning process shall include: (3) Review and incorporation, if appropriate, of existing

plans, studies, reports, and technical information.

At the beginning of the planning process, the CHR team organized several written resources from UKEM and the Steering Committee that each contain valuable information about hazards to incorporate into the writing sections of the plan. The CHR team reviewed several existing plans to identify programs and policies that currently promote or could potentially further mitigation initiatives for UK. The following is a list of reports, plans, and manuals containing information that were incorporated into the plan:

Reports/Studies Board of Trustees Online Archive Chronology of the University of Kentucky University of Kentucky Fact Booklet 2008-

2009 Plans and Manuals

Enhanced Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan Facility Condition Assessment & Space Study Project

Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government Hazard Mitigation Plan Top 20 Business Plan University of Kentucky UK Physical Development Campus Plan 2050 UK Strategic Plan 2003-2006

Technical Information Kentucky Climate Center

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) – National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)

Page 29: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

29

RISK ASSESSMENT

Page 30: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

30

4 Risk Assessment

4.1 Identifying Hazards Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(i): [The risk assessment shall include a] description of the type … of all natural hazards that can affect the jurisdiction. 4.1.1 Methodology The first step of the risk assessment is to identify the hazards that may threaten or may occur in the UK community. The UK community encompasses two categories of facilities: main campus facilities and non-campus facilities. Based on the extensive number of facilities located all throughout the state, the best method of obtaining state hazard information was by reviewing the Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan and the LFUCG Hazard Mitigation Plan. In addition to reviewing the state plan, a search was conducted of databases from NOAA, newspaper articles, and other university archived records (see References for sources used). As a result UKEM and CHR identified 13 natural hazards that threaten the UK community:

• Dam Failure • Drought • Earthquake • Extreme Heat • Flood • Hailstorm

• Karst/Sinkhole • Landslide • Mine Subsidence • Severe Storm • Wildfire • Wind Storm • Winter Storm

In addition to reviewing and researching existing sources, the Steering Committee completed a worksheet in order to gauge the perceived risk of natural hazards to the UK community. At the first Steering Committee Meeting on November 2, 2007, members were asked to complete a Hazard Ranking Worksheet (see Appendix 8) and were tasked to rank the 13 identified natural hazards from 1 (most likely to occur) to 13 (least likely to occur). This exercise allowed the Steering Committee to understand the full range of hazards that need to be considered in the plan. The following table shows the results of the 21 Hazard Ranking worksheets that were collected by the CHR staff. An average was calculated for each natural hazard and a ranking is assigned based on the average scores:

Page 31: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

31

Figure 8. Natural Hazard Ranking Exercise Results

Severe Storm 1 Tornado 2 Winter Storm 3 Hailstorm 4 Flood

5

Extreme Heat 6 Drought 7 Karst/Sinkhole 8 Earthquake 9 Wildfire 10 Mine Subsidence 11 Landslide 12 Dam Failure 13

In sections 4.1.2 – 4.1.14, each of the 13 identified hazards that affect UK are defined and described: 4.1.2 Dam Failure Description There are about 80,000 dams in the United States, the majority of which are privately owned. Other owners are state and local authorities, public utilities, and federal agencies. The benefits of dams are numerous; they provide water for drinking, navigation, and agricultural irrigation. Dams also provide hydroelectric power and create lakes for fishing and recreation. Most important; dams save lives by preventing or reducing floods. While dams have many benefits, they can also pose a risk to communities if not designed, operated, and maintained properly. In the event of a dam failure, the

energy of the water stored behind even a small dam is capable of causing loss of life and great property damage if there are people downstream of the dam. The National Dam Safety Program is dedicated to protecting the lives of American citizens and their property from the risks associated with the development, operation, and maintenance of America's dams. Types Manmade dams may be classified by: 1) the type of materials used; 2) the methods used in construction; 3) the slope or cross-section of the dam; 4) the way the dam resists water pressure forces; 5) the means for controlling seepage; and/or 6) the purpose of the dam. Materials used for dams may include earth, rock, tailings from mining or milling, concrete, masonry, steel, timber, and/or miscellaneous materials (such as plastic or rubber).

• Embankment dams are the most common type of dam in use today. Materials include natural soil or rock, or waste materials obtained from mining or milling operations. An embankment dam is termed an “earth-fill” or “rock-fill” dam depending on whether it is comprised of compacted earth or of dumped rock. The ability of an embankment dam to resist the reservoir water pressure is primarily a result of the mass weight, type and strength of the materials from which the dam is made.

Page 32: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

32

(Source: FEMA 333; Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety, Hazard Potential Classifications for Dams, October 1998)

• Concrete dams may be categorized as gravity or arch dams according to the design used to resist the stress of reservoir water pressure. Concrete gravity dams use the mass weight of concrete and friction to resist reservoir water pressure. A buttress dam is a specific type of gravity dam in which the large mass of concrete is reduced, and the forces are diverted to the dam foundation through vertical or sloping buttresses.

• Concrete arch dams are typically thin in cross-

section. The reservoir water forces acting on an arch dam are carried laterally into the abutments. The shape of the arch may resemble a segment of a circle or an ellipse, and the arch may be curved in the vertical plane as well. Such dams are usually constructed of a series of thin vertical blocks that are keyed together; barriers to stop water from flowing are provided between blocks.

• Coal impoundments are defined by the Mining

Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) as any structure associated with coal mining operations built to impound water and, are either 20 feet high, or capable of impounding 20 acres of water. Coal impoundments store coal slurry (wastewater and impurities that result from coal washing and processing). A bulkhead or embankment is made of coarse coal refuse and acts as a dam. Behind it lies a pond of coal slurry. Sediment settles out of this turbid mixture, filling the pond, while wastewater is recycled back into the coal washing process.

The sizes of the ponds and bulkheads vary, but pond basins are often hundreds of feet deep and hold millions of gallons of slurry. As of this year, coal impoundment failures have resulted in property damage, environmental contamination and, in one case, loss of life.

Dams are classified based on the evaluation of damage possible downstream. The FEMA guide to dam classifications uses the following system: Figure 9. Classification of Dams

Classification of Dams Classification Description Class A (Low) No loss of human life is expected and damage

will only occur to the dam owner's property Class B (Moderate/Significant)

Loss of human life is not probable, but economic loss, environmental damage, and/or disruption of lifeline facilities can be expected

Class C (High) Loss of one or more human life is expected General Dam Facts

• There are 76,926 dams listed in the national inventory (1998-1999 edition).

• Only 2.7% of the dams are owned by the federal government.

• 81% of the dams in the inventory are earthen dams.

Page 33: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

33

• 1,595 significant hazard dams are within one mile of a downstream city.

• The average age for a dam is 40 years. Likelihood of Occurrence Signs of Potential Dam Failure

• Seepage. The appearance of seepage on the downstream slope, abutments, or downstream area is cause for concern. If the water is muddy and is coming from a well-defined hole, material is probably being eroded from inside the embankment and a potentially dangerous situation can develop.

• Erosion. Erosion on the dam and spillway is one

of the most evident signs of danger. The size of erosion channels and gullies can increase greatly with slight amounts of rainfall.

• Cracks. Cracks are of two types: traverse and

longitudinal. Traverse cracks appear perpendicular to the axis of the dam and indicate settlement of the dam. Longitudinal cracks run parallel to the axis of the dam and may be the signal for a slide, or slump, on either face of the dam.

• Slides and Slumps. A massive slide can mean

catastrophic failure of the dam. Slides occur for many reasons and their occurrence can mean a major reconstruction effort.

• Subsidence. Subsidence is the vertical

movement of the foundation materials due to failure of consolidation. Rate of subsidence may be so slow that it can go unnoticed without proper inspection. Foundation settlement is the result of placing the dam and reservoir on an area lacking suitable strength, or over collapsed caves or mines.

• Structural. Conduit separations or ruptures can

result in water leaking into the embankment and subsequent weakening of the dam. Pipe collapse can result in hydraulic failures due to diminished capacity.

• Vegetation. A prominent danger signal is the

appearance of "wet environment" types of vegetation such as cattails, reeds, mosses and other wet area vegetation. These types of vegetation can be a sign of seepage.

• Boils. Boils indicate seepage water exiting under

some pressure and typically occur in areas downstream of the dam.

• Animal Burrows. Animal burrows are a potential

danger since such activity can undermine the structural integrity of the dam.

• Debris. Debris on dams and spillways can

reduce the function of spillways, damage

Page 34: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

34

structures and valves, and destroy vegetative cover.

Types of Failures

• Hydraulic Failure. Hydraulic failures result from the uncontrolled flow of water over the dam, around the dam and adjacent to the dam, and the erosive action of water on the dam and its foundation. Earth dams are particularly vulnerable to hydraulic failure since earth erodes at relatively small velocities.

• Seepage Failure. All dams exhibit some seepage

that must be controlled in velocity and amount. Seepage occurs both through the dam and the foundation. If uncontrolled, seepage can erode material from the foundation of an earth dam to form a conduit through which water can pass. This passing of water often leads to a complete failure of the structure, known as piping.

• Structural Failure. Structural failures involve the

rupture of the dam and/or its foundation. This is particularly a hazard for large dams and for dams built of low strength materials such as silts, slag, fly ash, etc. Dam failures generally result from a complex interrelationship of several failure modes. Uncontrolled seepage may weaken the soils and lead to a structural failure. Structural failure may shorten the seepage path and lead to a piping failure. Surface erosion may lead to structural or piping failures.

Page 35: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

35

(Source: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA))

4.1.3 Drought Description A drought is defined as the cumulative deficit of precipitation relative to what is normal for a region over an extended period of time. Unlike other natural hazards, a drought is a non-event that evolves as a prolonged dry spell. It may be difficult to determine when a drought begins or ends. A drought can be short, lasting just a few months, or persist for years before climatic conditions return to normal. Drought conditions can occur at any time throughout the year, but are most apparent during the summer months. Because the impacts of a drought accumulate slowly at first, a drought may not be recognized until it has become well-established. The many aspects of drought reflect its varied impacts on people and the environment. While the impacts of that deficit may be extensive, it is the deficit, not the impacts, that defines a meteorological drought. Types Drought is measured in the Palmer Drought Severity Index according to the level of recorded precipitation against the average, or normal, amount of precipitation for a region.

Figure 10. Palmer Drought Severity Index

(

Facts

• High temperatures, prolonged high winds, and low relative humidity can aggravate drought conditions.

• Droughts can lead to economic losses such as unemployment, decreased land values, and Agro-business losses.

• In 1998, over 2 billion dollars in property loss was credited to drought in the United States.

Primary Effects

• Crop failure is the most apparent effect of drought in that it has a direct impact on the economy and, in many cases, health (nutrition) of the population that is affected by it. Due to a lack of water and moisture in the soil, many

Palmer Classifications System (PDSI) +4.0 in. or more extremely wet 3.0 in to 3.99 in very wet 2.0 in to 2.99 in moderately wet 1.0 in to 1.99 in slightly wet 0.5 in to 0.99 in incipient wet spell 0.49 in to -0.49 in near normal -0.5 in to -0.99 in incipient dry spell -1.9 in to -1.99 in mild drought -2.0 in to -2.99 in moderate drought -3.0 in to -3.99 in severe drought -4.0 in or less extreme drought

Page 36: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

36

crops will not produce normally or efficiently and, in many cases, may be lost entirely.

• Water shortage is a very serious effect of

drought in that the availability of potable water is severely decreased when drought conditions persist. Springs, wells, streams, and reservoirs have been known to run dry due to the decrease in ground water, and, in extreme cases, navigable rivers have become unsafe for navigation as a result of drought.

Secondary Effects

• Fire susceptibility is increased with the absence of moisture associated with a drought. Dry conditions have been known to promote the occurrence of widespread wildfires.

Tertiary Effects

• Environmental degradation in the forms of erosion and ecological damage can be seen in cases of drought. As moisture in topsoil decreases and the ground becomes dryer, the susceptibility to windblown erosion increases. In prolonged drought situations, forest root systems can be damaged and/or destroyed resulting in loss of habitat for certain species. In addition, prolonged drought conditions may result in loss of food sources for certain species.

• In prolonged drought situations the soil surrounding structures subsides, sometimes

creating cracks in foundations and separation of foundations from above ground portions of the structure.

Page 37: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

37

4.1.4 Earthquake Description An earthquake is a sudden, rapid shaking of the Earth caused by the breaking and shifting of rock beneath the Earth's surface. For hundreds of millions of years, the forces of plate tectonics have shaped the Earth as the huge plates that form the Earth's surface move slowly over, under, and past each other. Sometimes the movement is gradual. At other times, the plates are locked together, unable to release the accumulating energy. When the accumulated energy grows strong enough, the plates break free releasing the stored energy and producing seismic waves generating an earthquake. The areas of greatest tectonic instability occur at the perimeters of the slowly moving plates, as these locations are subjected to the greatest strains from plates traveling in opposite directions and at different speeds. However, some earthquakes occur in the middle of plates. Ground motion, the movement of the earth’s surface during earthquakes or explosions, is the catalyst for most of the damage during an earthquake. Produced by waves generated by a sudden slip on a fault or sudden pressure at the explosive source, ground motion travels through the earth and along its surface. Ground motions are amplified by soft soils overlying hard bedrock, referred to as ground motion amplification. Ground motion amplification can cause an excess amount of damage during an earthquake, even to sites very far from the epicenter.

Earthquakes strike suddenly and without warning. Earthquakes can occur at any time of the year and at any time of the day or night. On a yearly basis, 70 to 75 damaging earthquakes occur throughout the world. Estimates of losses from a future earthquake in the United States approach $200 billion. Ground shaking from earthquakes can collapse buildings and bridges, disrupt gas, electric, and phone service, and sometimes trigger landslides, avalanches, flash floods, fires, and huge, destructive ocean waves (tsunamis). Buildings with foundations resting on unconsolidated landfill and other unstable soil, and trailers and homes not tied to their foundations are at risk because they can be shaken off their mountings during an earthquake. When an earthquake occurs in a populated area, it may cause deaths and injuries and extensive property damage. The Northridge, California, earthquake of January 17, 1994, struck a modern urban environment generally designed to withstand the forces of earthquakes. Its economic cost, nevertheless, has been estimated at $20 billion. Fortunately, relatively few lives were lost. Exactly one year later, Kobe, Japan, a densely populated community less prepared for earthquakes than Northridge, was devastated by the most costly earthquake ever to occur. Property losses were projected at $96 billion, and at least 5,378 people were killed. These two earthquakes tested building codes and construction practices, as well as emergency preparedness and response procedures.

Page 38: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

38

There are 45 states and territories in the United States at moderate to very high risk from earthquakes, and they are located in every region of the country. California experiences the most frequent damaging earthquakes. However, Alaska experiences the greatest number of large earthquakes-most located in uninhabited areas. The largest earthquakes felt in the United States were along the New Madrid Fault in Missouri, where a three-month long series of quakes from 1811 to 1812 included three quakes larger than a magnitude of 8 on the Richter Scale. These earthquakes were felt over the entire eastern United States, with Missouri, Tennessee, Kentucky, Indiana, Illinois, Ohio, Alabama, Arkansas, and Mississippi experiencing the strongest ground shaking. Types Earthquakes are measured in terms of their magnitude and intensity using the Richter Scale and Modified Mercalli Scale of Earthquake Intensity. The Richter magnitude scale measures an earthquake’s magnitude using an open-ended logarithmic scale that describes the energy release of an earthquake through a measure of shock wave amplitude. The earthquake’s magnitude is expressed in whole numbers and decimal fractions. Each whole number increase in magnitude represents a 10-fold increase in measured wave amplitude, or a release of 32 times more energy than the preceding whole number value.

The Modified Mercalli Scale measures the effect of an earthquake on the Earth’s surface. Composed of 12 increasing levels of intensity that range from unnoticeable shaking to catastrophic destruction, the scale is designated by Roman numerals. There is no mathematical basis to the scale; rather, it is an arbitrary ranking based on observed events. The lower values of the scale detail the manner in which the earthquake is felt by people, while the increasing values are based on observed structural damage. The intensity values are assigned after gathering responses to questionnaires administered to postmasters in affected areas in the aftermath of the earthquake.

Page 39: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

39

(Source: North Carolina Emergency Management www.dem.dcc.state.nc.us/mitigation/earthquake.htm)

Figure 11. The Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale

Facts Earthquakes in the central or eastern United States affect much larger areas than earthquakes of similar magnitude in the western United States. For example, the San Francisco, California earthquake of 1906 (magnitude 7.8) was felt 350 miles away in the middle

of Nevada, whereas the New Madrid earthquake of December 1811 (magnitude 8.0) rang church bells in Boston, Massachusetts, 1,000 miles away. Differences in geology east and west of the Rocky Mountains cause this strong contrast.

The Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale Scale Intensity Description of Effects Maximum

Acceleration (mm/sec)

Corresponding Richter Scale

I Instrumental Detectable only on seismographs <10 II Feeble Some people feel it <25 <4.2 III Slight Felt by people resting (like a truck rumbling by) <50 IV Moderate Felt by people walking <100 V Slightly Strong Sleepers awake; church bells ring <250 <4.8 VI Strong Trees sway; suspended objects swing; objects

fall off shelves <500 <5.4

VII Very Strong Mild alarm; walls crack; plaster falls <1000 <6.1 VIII Destructive Moving cars uncontrollable; masonry fractures;

poorly constructed buildings damaged <2500

IX Ruinous Some houses collapse; ground cracks; pipes break open

<5000 <6.9

X Disastrous Ground cracks profusely; many buildings destroyed; liquefaction and landslides widespread

<7500 <7.3

XI Very Disastrous Most buildings and bridges collapse; roads, railways, pipes and cables destroyed; general triggering of other hazards

<9800 <8.1

XII Catastrophic Total destruction; trees fall; ground rises and falls in waves

>9800 >8.1

Page 40: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

40

(Source: United States Geological Survey http://quake.usgs.gov/prepare/factsheets/NewMadrid)

Although earthquakes in the central and eastern United States are less frequent than in the western United States, they affect much larger areas. This is shown by two areas affected by earthquakes of similar magnitude, the 1895 Charleston, Missouri, earthquake in the New Madrid seismic zone and the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake. Red indicates minor to major damage to buildings and their contents. Yellow indicates shaking felt, but little or no damage to objects, such as dishes. Figure 12. Earthquake Seismic Zones

Page 41: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

41

(Source: www.disasterrelief.org/Library/WorldDis/wde2_txt.html#cont)

Figure 13: Ten Largest Earthquakes in Contiguous US

Ten Largest Earthquakes in Contiguous United States Magnitude Date Location 7.9 February 7, 1812 New Madrid, Missouri 7.9 January 9, 1857 Fort Tejon, California 7.8 March 26, 1872 Owens Valley, California 7.8 February 24, 1892 Imperial Valley, California 7.7 December 16, 1811 New Madrid, Missouri area 7.7 April 18, 1906 San Francisco, California 7.7 October 3, 1915 Pleasant Valley, Nevada 7.6 January 23, 1812 New Madrid, Missouri 7.5 July 21, 1952 Kern County, California 7.3 November 4, 1927 west of Lompoc, California 7.3 December 16, 1954 Dixie Valley, Nevada 7.3 August 18,1959 Hebgen Lake, Montana 7.3 October 28, 1983 Borah Peak, Idaho

Likelihood of Occurrence The goal of earthquake prediction is to give warning of potentially damaging earthquakes early enough to allow appropriate response to the disaster, enabling people to minimize loss of life and property. The U.S. Geological Survey conducts and supports research on the likelihood of future earthquakes. This research includes field, laboratory, and theoretical investigations of earthquake mechanisms and fault zones. A primary goal of earthquake research is to increase the reliability of earthquake probability estimates. Ultimately,

scientists would like to be able to specify a high probability for a specific earthquake, on a particular fault, within a particular year. Scientists estimate earthquake probabilities in two ways: by studying the history of large earthquakes in a specific area, and by the rate at which strain accumulates in the rock. Scientists study the past frequency of large earthquakes in order to determine the future likelihood of similar large shocks. For example, if a region has experienced four magnitude 7 or larger earthquakes during 200 years of recorded history, and if these shocks occurred randomly in time, then scientists would assign a 50 percent probability (that is, just as likely to happen as not to happen) to the occurrence of another magnitude 7 or larger quake in the region during the next 50 years. But in many places, the assumption of random occurrence with time may not be true, because when strain is released along one part of the fault system, it may actually increase on another part. Four magnitude 6.8 or larger earthquakes and many magnitude 6 - 6.5 shocks occurred in the San Francisco Bay region during the 75 years between 1836 and 1911. For the next 68 years (until 1979), no earthquakes of magnitude 6 or larger occurred in the region. Beginning with a magnitude 6.0 “shock” in 1979, the earthquake activity in the region increased dramatically; between 1979 and 1989, there were four, magnitude 6 or greater earthquakes, including the magnitude 7.1 Loma Prieta earthquake. This clustering of earthquakes leads scientists to estimate that the probability of a magnitude

Page 42: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

42

6.8 or larger earthquake occurring during the next 30 years in the San Francisco Bay region is about 67 percent (twice as likely as not). Another way to estimate the likelihood of future earthquakes is to study how fast strain accumulates. When plate movements build the strain in rocks to a critical level, like pulling a rubber band too tight, the rocks will suddenly break and slip to a new position. Scientists measure how much strain accumulates along a fault segment each year, how much time has passed since the last earthquake along the segment, and how much strain was released in the last earthquake. This information is then used to calculate the time required for the accumulating strain to build to a level resulting in an earthquake. This simple model is complicated by the fact that such detailed information about faults is rare. In the United States, only the San Andreas Fault system has adequate records for using this prediction method. The University of Memphis estimates that, for a 50-year period, the probability of a repeat of the New Madrid 1811-1812 earthquakes with:

• a magnitude of 7.5 - 8.0 is 7 to 10% • a magnitude of 6.0 or larger is 25 to 40%

Page 43: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

43

4.1.5 Extreme Heat Description Temperatures that hover 10 degrees or more above the average high temperature for the region and last for several weeks are defined as extreme heat. Heat Index Our bodies dissipate heat by varying the rate and depth of blood circulation, by losing water through the skin and sweat glands, and as a last resort, by panting, when blood is heated above 98.6°F. Sweating cools the body through evaporation. However, high relative humidity retards evaporation, robbing the body of its ability to cool itself.

Figure 14. U.S. Record High Temperature

(http://www.crh.noaa.gov/pub/heat.htm) (Due to the nature of the heat index calculation, the values in the table have an error +/- 1.3F.)

Page 44: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

44

NOAA’s National Weather Service Heat Index Program

Based on the latest research findings, the NWS has devised the “Heat Index” (HI). The HI, given in degrees F, is an accurate measure of how hot it really feels when relative humidity (RH) is added to the actual air temperature. The NWS will initiate alert procedures when the HI is expected to exceed 105°- 110°F for at least two consecutive days. The Heat Index is the temperature the body feels when heat and humidity are combined. The chart below shows the HI that corresponds to the actual air temperature and relative humidity.

Considering the tragic death toll which occurred in 1980, the NWS has stepped up its efforts to alert more effectively the general public and appropriate authorities to the hazards of heat waves-those prolonged excessive heat/humidity episodes.

Types of Heat Disorder Symptoms

When heat gain exceeds the level the body can remove, body temperature begins to rise, and heat related illnesses and disorders might develop. Elderly persons, small children, chronic invalids, those on certain medications and persons with weight and alcohol problems are particularly susceptible to heat reactions, especially during heat waves in areas where a moderate climate usually prevails. Heat disorders generally have to do with a reduction or collapse of the

Figure 15. NWS Heat Index

body’s ability to shed heat by circulatory changes and sweating, or a chemical (salt) imbalance caused by too much sweating. When heat gain exceeds the level the body can remove, or when the body cannot compensate for fluids and salt lost through perspiration, the temperature of the body’s inner core begins to rise and heat-related illness may develop.

Page 45: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

45

Ranging in severity, heat disorders share one common feature: the individual has overexposed or over exercised for his age and physical condition in the existing thermal environment. Studies indicate that, other things being equal, the severity of heat disorders tend to increase with age. Heat cramps in a 17-year-old may be heat exhaustion in someone 40 and heat stroke in a person over 60.

• Sunburn: Redness and pain. In severe cases swelling of skin, blisters, fever, and headaches. Sunburn, with its ultraviolet radiation burns, can significantly retard the skin’s ability to shed excess heat.

• Heat Cramps: Painful spasms usually in muscles of legs and abdomen possible. Heavy sweating.

• Heat Exhaustion: Heavy sweating, weakness, skin cold, pale and clammy. Pulse thready. Normal temperature possible. Fainting and vomiting.

• Heat Stroke (or sunstroke): High body temperature (106° F. or higher). Hot dry skin. Rapid and strong pulse. Possible unconsciousness

Figure 16. Heat Index/Heat Disorders Impacts

Heat Index/Heat Disorders Impacts Heat Index Heat Disorders I

130° or Higher Heatstroke/sunstroke highly likely with continued exposure

105°- 130° Sunstroke, heat cramps or heat exhaustion likely, and heatstroke possible with prolonged exposure and/or physical activity

90°- 105°: Sunstroke, heat cramps and heat exhaustion possible with prolonged exposure and/or physical activity

80° - 90° Fatigue possible with prolonged exposure and/or physical activity

Page 46: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

46

4.1.6 Flood Description During the 20th century, floods were the number one natural disaster in the U.S. in terms of number of lives lost and property damage, and they are the number one weather-related killer. Most communities in the U.S. have experienced some kind of flooding. Floods can be slow, or fast rising, but generally develop over a period of days. For instance, the Mississippi River flood of 1993 was caused by repeated heavy rain from thunderstorms over a period of weeks. Hundreds of floods occur each year, making it one of the most common hazards in all 50 states and U.S. territories. In most years, flooding accounts for or is involved with three-quarters of federal disaster declarations claiming about 140 lives each year and responsible for more damage to property each year than any other type of weather hazard. A flood is a natural event for rivers and streams and is caused in a variety of ways. Winter or spring rains, coupled with melting snows, can fill river basins too quickly. Torrential rains from decaying hurricanes or other tropical systems can also produce flooding. The excess water from snowmelt, rainfall, or storm surge accumulates and overflows onto the banks and adjacent floodplains. Floodplains are lowlands, adjacent to rivers, lakes, and oceans that are subject to recurring floods. Currently, floodplains in the U.S. are home to over nine million households.

A flood, as defined by the National Flood Insurance Program is a general and temporary condition of partial or complete inundation of two or more acres of normally dry land area, or of two or more properties from:

• overflow of inland or tidal waters; • unusual and rapid accumulation or runoff of

surface waters from any source; • a mudflow; or, • a collapse or subsidence of land along the shore

of a lake or similar body of water as a result of erosion or undermining caused by waves or currents of water exceeding anticipated cyclical levels that result in a flood.

Factors determining the severity of floods include:

• Rainfall intensity and duration o A large amount of rain over a short time

can result in flash flooding o Small amounts may cause flooding where

the soil is saturated o Small amounts may cause flooding if

concentrated in an area of impermeable surfaces

• Topography and ground cover o Water runoff is greater in areas with steep

slopes and little vegetation Frequency of inundation depends on the climate, soil, and channel slope. In regions without extended periods

Page 47: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

47

of below-freezing temperatures, floods usually occur in the season of highest precipitation. Types Floods are the result of a multitude of naturally occurring and human-induced factors, but they all can be defined as the accumulation of too much water in too little time in a specific area. Types of floods include regional floods, river or riverine floods, flashfloods, urban floods, ice-jam floods, storm-surge floods, dam- and levee-failure floods, and debris, landslide, and mudflow floods.

• Regional Flooding can occur seasonally when winter or spring rains coupled with melting snow fill river basins with too much water too quickly. The ground may be frozen, reducing infiltration into the soil and thereby increasing runoff. Extended wet periods during any part of the year can create saturated soil conditions, after which any additional rain runs off into streams and rivers, until river capacities are exceeded. Regional floods are many times associated with slow-moving, low-pressure or frontal storm systems including decaying hurricanes or tropical storms.

• River or Riverine Flooding is a high flow or

overflow of water from a river or similar body of water, occurring over a period of time too long to be considered a flash flood.

• Flash Floods are quick-rising floods that usually occur as the result of heavy rains over a short period of time, often only several hours or even less. Flash floods can occur within several seconds to several hours and with little warning. They can be deadly because they produce rapid rises in water levels and have devastating flow velocities.

Several factors can contribute to flash flooding. Among these are rainfall intensity, rainfall duration, surface conditions, and topography and slope of the receiving basin. Urban areas are susceptible to flash floods because a high percentage of the surface area is composed of impervious streets, roofs, and parking lots where runoff occurs very rapidly. Mountainous areas also are susceptible to flash floods, as steep topography may funnel runoff into a narrow canyon. Floodwaters accelerated by steep stream slopes can cause the flood-wave to move downstream too fast to allow escape, resulting in many deaths Flashfloods can also be caused by ice jams on rivers in conjunction with a winter or spring thaw, or occasionally even a dam break. The constant influx of water finally causes a treacherous overflow; powerful enough to sweep vehicles away, roll boulders into roadways, uproot trees, level buildings, and drag bridges off their piers. Urban Flooding is possible when land is converted from fields or woodlands to roads and parking lots; thus, losing its ability to absorb rainfall. Urbanization of a watershed changes the hydrologic systems of the basin. Heavy rainfall collects and flows

Page 48: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

48

faster on impervious concrete and asphalt surfaces. The water moves from the clouds, to the ground, and into streams at a much faster rate in urban areas. Adding these elements to the hydrological systems can result in floodwaters that rise very rapidly and peak with violent force. During periods of urban flooding, streets can become swift moving rivers and basements can fill with water. Storm drains often back up with vegetative debris causing additional, localized flooding.

• Ice-Jam Flooding occurs on rivers that are totally

or partially frozen. A rise in stream stage will break up a totally frozen river and create ice flows that can pile up on channel obstructions such as shallow riffles, log jams, or bridge piers. The jammed ice creates a dam across the channel over which the water and ice mixture continues to flow, allowing for more jamming to occur. Backwater upstream from the ice dam can rise rapidly and overflow the channel banks. Flooding moves downstream when the ice dam fails, and the water stored behind the dam is released. At this time the flood takes on the characteristics of a flash flood, with the added danger of ice flows that, when driven by the energy of the flood-wave, can inflict serious damage on structures. An added danger of being caught in an ice-jam flood is hypothermia, which can quickly kill.

• Storm-surge flooding is water that is pushed up

onto otherwise dry land by onshore winds. Friction between the water and the moving air

creates drag that, depending upon the distance of water (fetch) and the velocity of the wind can pile water up to depths greater than 20 feet. Intense, low-pressure systems and hurricanes can create storm-surge flooding. The storm surge is unquestionably the most dangerous part of a hurricane as pounding waves create very hazardous flood currents.

Nine out of 10 hurricane fatalities are caused by the storm surge. Worst-case scenarios occur when the storm surge occurs concurrently with high tide. Stream flooding is much worse inland during the storm surge because of backwater effects.

• Dam-and Levee-Failure Flooding are potentially the worst flood events. A dam failure is usually the result of neglect, poor design, or structural damage caused by a major event such as an earthquake. When a dam fails, an excess amount of water is suddenly let loose downstream, destroying anything in its path. Dams and levees are built for flood protection. They usually are engineered to withstand a flood with computed risk of occurrence. For example, a dam or levee may be designed to contain a flood at a location on a stream that has a certain probability of occurring in any one year. If a larger flood occurs, then that structure will be overtopped. If during the overtopping the dam or levee fails or is washed out, the water behind it is released

Page 49: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

49

and becomes a flash flood. Failed dams or levees can create floods that are catastrophic to life and property because of the tremendous energy of the released water.

• Debris, Landslide, and Mudflow Flooding is

created by the accumulation of debris, mud, rocks, and/or logs in a channel, forming a temporary dam. Flooding occurs upstream as water becomes stored behind the temporary dam and then becomes a flash flood when the dam is breached and rapidly washes away. Landslides can create large waves on lakes or embayment’s and can be deadly. Mudflow floods can occur when volcanic activity rapidly melts mountain snow and glaciers, and the water mixed with mud and debris moves rapidly down slope.

Most lives are lost when people are swept away by flood currents, whereas most property damage results from inundation by sediment-laden water. Flood currents also possess tremendous destructive power as lateral forces can demolish buildings and erosion can undermine bridge foundations and footings leading to the collapse of structures. Facts Most people are unaware that:

• 80% of flood deaths occur in vehicles, and most happen when drivers try to navigate through flood waters.

• Only six inches of rapidly moving flood water can knock a person down.

• A mere two feet of water can float a large vehicle.

• One-third of flooded roads and bridges are so damaged by water that any vehicle trying to cross stands only a 50% chance of making it to the other side.

• 95% of those killed in a flash flood tried to outrun the waters along their path rather than climbing rocks or going uphill to higher grounds.

• Most flood-related deaths are due to flash floods. • Most homeowners’ insurance policies do not

cover floodwater damage. • Flooding has caused the deaths of more than

10,000 people since 1900. • Property damage from flooding now totals over

$1 billion each year in the U.S. • More than $4 billion is spent on flood damage in

the U.S. each year. • More than 2,200 lives were lost as a result of the

Johnstown, Pennsylvania flood of 1889. This flood was caused by an upstream dam failure.

• On July 31, 1976, the Big Thompson River near Denver overflowed after an extremely heavy storm. A wall of water 19 feet high roared down the Big Thompson Canyon where many people were camping. 140 people perished and millions of dollars of property were lost.

Page 50: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

50

• On average, there are about 145 deaths each year due to flooding.

• About one-third of insurance claims for flood damages are for properties located outside identified flood hazard areas.

• Under normal conditions floods do not cause damage. Damage occurs when structures are built in flood-prone areas.

Common Flood-Related Terms

• 100-Year Flood Plain. The area that has a 1% chance, on average, of flooding in any given year. (Also known as the Base Flood.)

• 500-Year Flood Plain. The area that has a 0.2% chance, on average, of flooding in any given year.

• Base Flood. Represents a compromise between minor floods and the greatest flood likely to occur in a given area. The elevation of water surface resulting from a flood that has a 1% chance of occurring in any given year.

• Floodplain. The land area adjacent to a river, stream, lake, estuary, or other water body that is subject to flooding. This area, if left undisturbed, acts to store excess floodwater. The floodplain is made up of two sections: the floodway and the flood fringe.

• Floodway. The NFIP floodway definition is “the channel of a river or other watercourse and adjacent land areas that must be reserved, in order to discharge the base flood without cumulatively increasing the water surface

elevation more than one foot.” The floodway carries the bulk of the floodwater downstream and is usually the area where water velocities and forces are the greatest. NFIP regulations require that the floodway be kept open and free from development or other structures that would obstruct or divert flood flows onto other properties. Floodways are not mapped for all rivers and streams but are generally mapped in developed areas. Unlike floodplains, floodways do not reflect a recognizable geologic feature.

• Flood Fringe. The flood fringe refers to the outer portions of the floodplain, beginning at the edge of the floodway and continuing outward. The fringe land area is outside of the stream or river floodway, but is subject to inundation by regular flooding

• Annual flooding. Occurs much more frequently than the 100-year flood and, over time, may in fact produce a much greater risk to structure.

Page 51: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

51

4.1.7 Hailstorm Description Hail is precipitation in the form of spherical or irregular pellets of ice larger than 5 millimeters (0.2 inches) in diameter (American Heritage Dictionary). Hail is a somewhat frequent occurrence associated with severe thunderstorms. Hailstones grow as ice pellets and are lifted by updrafts, and collect super-cooled water droplets. As they grow, hailstones become heavier and begin to fall. Sometimes, they are caught by successively stronger updrafts and are re-circulated through the cloud growing larger each time the cycle is repeated. Eventually, the updrafts can no longer support the weight of the hailstones. As hailstones fall to the ground, they produce a hail-streak (i.e. area where hail falls) that may be more than a mile wide and a few miles long. Types Hail is a unique and fairly common hazard capable of producing extensive damage from the impact of these falling objects. Hailstorms occur more frequently during the late spring and early summer months. Most thunderstorms do not produce hail, and ones that do normally produce only small hailstones not more than one-half inch in diameter. However, hailstones can grow larger than the size of a golf ball before falling to the ground.

Figure 17. Hail Conversion Chart

Hail conversion chart Diameter of Hailstones

(inches) Description

0.50 Marble 0.70 Dime 0.75 Penny 0.88 Nickel 1.00 Quarter 1.25 Half Dollar 1.50 Walnut 1.75 Golf Ball 2.00 Hen Egg 2.50 Tennis Ball 2.75 Baseball 3.00 Tea Cup 4.00 Grapefruit 4.50 Softball

Facts

• Hailstones can fall at speeds of up to 120 mph. • Hail is responsible for nearly $1 billion in damage

to crops and property each year in the U.S. • The largest hailstone ever recorded fell in

Coffeyville, Kansas in 1970. It measured over 5.6 inches in diameter and weighed almost two pounds.

Page 52: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

52

4.1.8 Karst/Sinkhole Description Karst is an area of irregular limestone in which erosion has produced fissures, sinkholes, underground streams, and caverns. A sinkhole is a natural depression in a land surface communicating with a subterranean passage, generally occurring in limestone regions and formed by solution or by collapse of a cavern roof (American Heritage Dictionary). Karst refers to a type of topography formed in limestone, dolomite, or gypsum by dissolution of these rocks by rain and underground water. It is characterized by closed depressions or sinkholes, and underground drainage. During the formation of Karst terrain, water percolating underground enlarges subsurface flow paths by dissolving the rock. As some subsurface flow paths are enlarged over time, water movement in the aquifer changes character from one where ground water flow was initially through small, scattered openings in the rock, to one where most flow is concentrated in a few, well-developed conduits. As the flow paths continue to enlarge, caves may be formed and the ground water table may drop below the level of surface streams. Surface streams may then begin to lose water to the subsurface. As more of the surface water is diverted underground, surface streams and stream valleys become a less conspicuous feature of the land surface, and are replaced by closed basins. Funnels or circular depressions called sinkholes often

develop at some places in the low points of these closed basins. Types

• Collapse sinkholes occur when the bridging material over a subsurface cavern cannot support the overlying material. The cover collapses into the cavern and a large, funnel-shaped depression forms.

• Solution sinkholes result from increased

groundwater flow into higher porosity zones within the rock, typically through fractures or joints within the rock. An increase of slightly acidic surface water into the subsurface continues the slow dissolution of the rock matrix, resulting in slow subsidence as surface materials fill the voids.

• Alluvial sinkholes are older sinkholes that have

been partially filled with marine, wetland or soil sediments. These features are common in places like Florida, where the water table is shallow, and typically appear as shallow lakes, cypress “domes” and wetlands.

• Raveling sinkholes form when a thick

overburden of sediment over a deep cavern caves into the void and pipes upward toward the surface. As the overlying material or “plug” erodes into the cavern, the void migrates upward

Page 53: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

53

until the cover can no longer be supported and then subsidence begins.

• Cover-Collapse Sinkholes occur in the soil or

other loose material overlying soluble bedrock. Sinkholes that suddenly appear form in two ways. In the first way, the bedrock roof of a cave becomes too thin to support the weight of the bedrock and the soil material above it. The cave roof then collapses, forming a bedrock-collapse sinkhole. Bedrock collapse is rare and the least likely way a sinkhole can form, although it is commonly incorrectly assumed to be the way all sinkholes form. The second way sinkholes can form is much more common and much less dramatic. The sinkhole begins to form when a fracture in the limestone bedrock is enlarged by water dissolving the limestone. As the bedrock is dissolved and carried away underground, the soil gently slumps or erodes into the developing sinkhole. Once the underlying conduits become large enough, insoluble soil and rock particles are carried away too. Cover-collapse sinkholes can vary in size from 1 or 2 feet deep and wide, to tens of feet deep and wide. The thickness and cohesiveness of the soil cover determine the size of a cover-collapse sinkhole.

Sinkhole Flooding Sinkhole flooding is a natural occurring event that usually follows the same storms that cause riverine flooding, so it is often not recognized as Karst-related.

Flood events will differ not only because of the amount of precipitation, but also because the drainage capacity of individual sinkholes can change, sometimes very suddenly, as the Karst landscape evolves. Sinkholes can also flood when their outlets are clogged, preventing water from being carried away as fast as it flows in. Trash thrown into a sinkhole can clog its throat, as can soil eroded from fields and construction sites or a natural rock fall near the sinkhole’s opening. Sometimes the conduit itself is too narrow because it has recently (in the geologic sense) captured a larger drainage basin. The reach of a conduit downstream from constriction could carry a higher flow than it is receiving were it not for this restriction. Sinkholes flood more easily around development (roofs, parking lots, highways) which increases both the total runoff and the rapidity of runoff from a storm. Another reason that sinkholes flood is because of back-flooding, the outcome when the discharge capacity of the entire Karst conduit network is exceeded. Some up-gradient sinkholes that drain normally during the short, modest accumulation of storms may actually become springs that discharge water during prolonged rainfall. Sinkhole flooding is one of the more tragic hazards because it affects private residences the most.

Page 54: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

54

(Source: Kentucky Geological Survey)

Figure 18. Aerial Image of Sinkhole Topography Land Surface Indicators of Sinkhole Collapse

• Circular and linear cracks in soil, asphalt, and concrete paving and floors

• Depressions in soil or pavement that commonly result in ponds of water

• Slumping, sagging, or tilting of trees, roads, rails, fences, pipes, poles, sign boards, and other vertical or horizontal structures

• Downward movement of small-diameter vertical or horizontal structures

• Fractures in foundations and walls, often accompanied by jammed doors and windows

• Small conical holes that appear in the ground over a relatively short period of time

• Sudden muddying of water in a well that has been producing clear water

• Sudden draining of a pond or creek

Strategies to Avoid Sinkhole Collapse

• Karst areas should be mapped thoroughly to help identify buried sinkholes and fracture trends. Geophysical methods, aerial photography, and digitally enhanced multi-spectral scanning can identify hidden soil drainage patterns, stressed vegetation, and moisture anomalies in soils over sinkholes.

• Sinkhole collapses are commonly repaired by dumping any available material into the hole. This technique usually diverts water to other locations and lessons the likelihood of collapse. Mitigate by excavating collapses in the bedrock drain, then refilling the dug hole with material graded upward from coarse rocks to finer sediments to allow natural flow through the bedrock drain without the loss of sediments that cause collapse. If a storm-water drainage well is needed, its casing should extend into and be tightly sealed along the bedrock.

• In large sinkholes, use bridges, pilings, pads of rock, concrete, special textiles, paved ditches, curbs, grouting, flumes, overflow channels, or a combination of methods to provide support for roads and other structures.

• Large buildings should not be built above domes in caves.

Page 55: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

55

4.1.9 Mine Subsidence Description Land subsidence occurs when the ground sinks to a lower than normal level. Mine subsidence is defined as the collapse of underground coal mines resulting in direct damage to a surface structure. Land subsidence occurs when large amounts of ground water have been withdrawn from certain types of rocks, such as fine-grained sediments. The rock compacts because the water is partly responsible for holding the ground up. When the water is withdrawn, the rock falls in on itself. Land subsidence can occur unnoticed because it covers large areas rather than in a small spot, like a sinkhole. Coal mine subsidence normally begins when the pillars of coal and the roof supports that were left in the mine can no longer support the bedrock above the mine. This loss of support is transferred to the ground surface which also drops, creating structural problems for houses, roads, and utilities in the subsidence area as well as public safety concerns on other improved property. The subsidence can occur immediately or many years later after the completion of mining. Mine subsidence is dependent on the type of mining and the geological framework of the area in question. As high quality coal becomes scarcer, there is an increase of the use of the longwall mining method which allows near-total extraction of the coal while

allowing "controlled" subsidence to occur. As mined out areas increase and communities expand over these areas, the incidences of subsidence damage and the amount of financial loss will also increase. Factors influencing the magnitude and extent of surface movements resulting from the subsurface extraction of coal are extremely complex and include:

• The thickness of the mined seam • The mining method • Total length and width of the extraction area • Depth to the seam • The nature of the overlying and underlying rocks • Surface topography • Geologic discontinuities such as faults • The elapsed time since mining took place • The size, shape, design, and construction of the

structures built upon the mined out areas Types

• Sag coal-mine subsidence occurs as a gentle depression over a large area. Sags can form when a large area of coal was mined or where several adjacent pillars have failed simultaneously. The area affected by a collapsing underground coal mine can be larger on the surface than below ground. This is dependent upon the angle of draw which is dictated by the thickness of the seam of coal mined and the distance between the surface and the mine. The deeper the mine, the larger the

Page 56: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

56

surface area disturbed and more shallow the subsidence depth. However, a mine that is closer to the surface will result in a deeper area of subsidence.

• Pits normally form over shallow coal mines

where the mining is less than 100 feet deep. Pits can develop over a few days once the settlement has reached the surface (this represents mostly vertical movement). The depth of a pit can vary from a few inches up to eight feet and be from two to 40 feet in diameter.

• Longwall mining involves total removal of coal

from a predetermined area. Nothing is left to support the roof and subsidence is almost immediate and complete. Once a longwall mine or panel has subsided, the vertical movement will cease since the void has been filled.

Mine Subsidence Site Development Problems Building homes, garages, roads, septic systems, and other such structures and infrastructure above abandoned underground mines can cause structural problems if subsidence occurs. Building near or above an abandoned underground mine, such as in many Abandoned Mine Lands (AML) areas, requires a thorough review to determine the subsidence potential and the need for stabilization before construction. AML funding cannot be used to

stabilize a structure in the event the owner failed to properly evaluate the site prior to development.

Page 57: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

57

4.1.10 Landslides Description Landslides occur when masses of rock, earth, or debris move down a slope. Landslides may be very small or very large, and can move at slow to very high speeds. Many landslides have been occurring over the same terrain since prehistoric times. They are activated by storms and fires and by human modification of the land. New landslides occur as a result of rainstorms, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and various human activities. Mudflows or debris flows are rivers of rock, earth, and other debris saturated with water. They develop when water rapidly accumulates in the ground, such as during heavy rainfall or rapid snowmelt, changing the earth into a flowing river of mud or "slurry." A slurry can flow rapidly down slopes or through channels, and can strike with little or no warning at avalanche speeds. A slurry can travel several miles from its source, growing in size as it picks up trees, cars, and other materials along the way. Most of the landslide damage does not occur in rugged mountain country. Most losses from landslides and soil creep occur in cities developed on gently sloping hillsides. Although a landslide may occur almost anywhere, from man-made slopes to natural, pristine ground, most slides often occur in areas that have experienced sliding in the past. All landslides are triggered by similar causes. These can be weaknesses

in the rock and soil, earthquake activity, the occurrence of heavy rainfall or snowmelt, or construction activity changing some critical aspect of the geological environment. Landslides that occur following periods of heavy rain or rapid snow melt worsen the accompanying effects of flooding. Landslides pose a hazard to nearly every state in the country by causing $2 billion in damages and 25 to 50 deaths a year. There is a concentration of losses in the Appalachian, Rocky Mountain and Pacific Coast regions. It has been estimated that about 40 percent of the U.S. population has been exposed to the direct and indirect effects of landslides. Public and private economic losses from landslides include not only the direct costs of replacing and repairing damaged facilities, but also the indirect cost associated with lost productivity, disruption of utility and transportation systems, reduced property values, and costs for any litigation. Some indirect costs are difficult to evaluate, thus estimates are usually conservative or simply ignored. If indirect costs were realistically determined, they likely would exceed direct costs. Much of the economic loss is borne by federal, state, and local agencies responsible for disaster assistance, flood insurance, and highway maintenance and repair. Private costs involve mainly damage to land and structures. A severe landslide can result in financial ruin for the property owners because landslide insurance (except for debris flow coverage) or other

Page 58: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

58

means of spreading the costs of damage are unavailable. Types

• Slides of soil or rock involve downward displacement along one of more failure surfaces. The material from the slide may be broken into a number of pieces or remain a single, intact mass. Sliding can be rotational, where movement involves turning about a specific point. Sliding can be translational, where movement is down slope on a path roughly parallel to the failure surface. The most common example of a rotational slide is a slump, which has a strong, backward rotational component and a curved, upwardly-concave failure surface.

• Flows are characterized by shear strains

distributed throughout the mass of material. They are distinguished from slides by high water content and distribution of velocities resembling that of viscous fluids. Debris flows are common occurrences in much of North America. These flows are a form of rapid movement in which loose soils, rocks, and organic matter, combined with air and water, form a slurry that flows down slope. The term “debris avalanche” describes a variety of very rapid to extremely rapid debris flows associated with volcanic hazards. Mudflows are flows of fine-grained materials, such as sand, silt, or clay, with high water

content. A subcategory of debris flows, mudflows contains less than 50 percent gravel.

• Lateral spreads are characterized by large

elements of distributed, lateral displacement of materials. They occur in rock, but the process is not well-documented and the movement rates are very slow. Lateral spreads can occur in fine-grained, sensitive soils such as quick clays, particularly if remolded or disturbed by construction and grading. Loose, granular soils commonly produce lateral spread through liquefaction. Liquefaction can occur spontaneously, presumably because of changes in pore-water pressures, or in response to vibrations such as those produced by strong earthquakes.

• Falls and Topples. Falls occur when masses of

rock or other material detach from a steep slope or cliff and descend by free fall, rolling, or bouncing. These movements are rapid to extremely rapid and are commonly triggered by earthquakes. Topples consist of forward rotation of rocks or other materials about a pivot point on a hill slope. Toppling may culminate in abrupt falling, sliding, or bouncing, but the movement is tilting without resulting in collapse. Data on rates of movement and control measures for topples is sparse.

Page 59: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

59

• Factors Contributing to Landslides

• Steep slopes are more susceptible to landslides and should be avoided when choosing a building site.

• Slope stability decreases as water moves into

the soil. Springs, seeps, roof runoff, gutter down spouts, septic systems, and site grading that cause ponding or runoff are sources of water that often contribute to landslides.

• Changing the natural slope by creating a level

area where none previously existed adds weight and increases the chance of a landslide.

• Poor site selection for roads and driveways. • Improper placement of fill material. • Removal of trees and other vegetation. Plants,

especially trees, help remove water and stabilize the soil with their extensive root systems.

Page 60: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

60

4.1.11 Severe Storm Description A thunderstorm is formed from a combination of moisture, rapidly rising warm air and a force capable of lifting air such as a warm and cold front, a sea breeze or a mountain. All thunderstorms contain lightning and may occur singly, in clusters or in lines. Thus, it is possible for several thunderstorms to affect one location in the course of a few hours. Some of the most severe weather occurs when a single thunderstorm affects one location for an extended period time. Lightning is an electrical discharge that results from the buildup of positive and negative charges within a thunderstorm. When the buildup becomes strong enough, lightning appears as a "bolt." This flash of light usually occurs within the clouds or between the clouds and the ground. A bolt of lightning reaches a temperature approaching 50,000 degrees Fahrenheit in a split second. The rapid heating and cooling of air near the lightning causes thunder. While thunderstorms and lightning can be found throughout the United States, they are most likely to occur in the central and southern states. Types of Thunderstorms

• Single Cell (pulse storms). Typically last 20-30 minutes. Pulse storms can produce severe weather elements such as downbursts, hail,

some heavy rainfall and occasionally weak tornadoes. This storm is light to moderately dangerous to the public and moderately to highly dangerous to aviation.

• Multicell Cluster. These storms consist of a

cluster of storms in varying stages of development. Multicell storms can produce moderate size hail, flash floods and weak tornadoes. This storm is moderately dangerous to the public and moderately to highly dangerous to aviation.

• Multicell Line. Multicell line storms consist of a

line of storms with a continuous, well developed gust front at the leading edge of the line. Also known as squall lines, these storms can produce small to moderate size hail, occasional flash floods and weak tornadoes. This storm is moderately dangerous to the public and moderately to highly dangerous to aviation.

• Supercell. Even though it is the rarest of storm

types, the supercell is the most dangerous because of the extreme weather generated. Defined as a thunderstorm with a rotating updraft, these storms can produce strong downbursts, large hail, occasional flash floods and weak to violent tornadoes. This storm is extremely dangerous to the public and aviation.

Page 61: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

61

Types of Lightning Flashes that do not strike the surface are called cloud flashes. They may be inside a cloud, travel from one part of a cloud to another, or from cloud to air. Overall, there are four different types of lightning:

• Cloud to sky (sprites) • Cloud to ground • Intra-cloud • Inter-cloud

Lightning flashes can have more than one ground point. Roughly, there are five to ten times as many cloud flashes than cloud to ground flashes. Thunderstorm Facts

• The National Weather Service estimates more than 100,000 thunderstorms worldwide each year.

• 1,800 to 2,000 thunderstorms occur worldwide in a given second.

• In the last 25 years, severe storms have been involved in over 300 federal disasters.

Dangers Associated with Thunderstorms

• Lightning • Flash floods • Hail • Outflow • Winds

o Downbursts or strong down drafts which can cause an outburst of potentially damaging winds at or near the ground

o Micro or macro-bursts • Tornadoes

Lightning Facts

• Lightning is the second most frequent killer in the U.S. with nearly 100 deaths and 500 injuries each year.

• Lightning is a component of all thunderstorms. • In the continental U.S. there are more than 40

million cloud to ground lightning flashes each year.

• The longest bolt, seen to date, was 118 miles long in the Dallas-Ft. Worth, TX area.

• The peak temperature of lightning is around 60,000 degree Fahrenheit, or about 5 times hotter than the surface of the Sun.

• Lightning most commonly occurs in thunderstorms, but it can also occur in snowstorms, sandstorms, and in the ejected material over volcanoes.

Cloud to ground lightning can injure or kill people and destroy objects by direct or indirect means. Objects can either absorb or transmit energy. The absorbed energy can cause the object to explode, burn, or totally destruct. The various forms of transfer are:

1) Tall object transferred to person 2) Tall object to ground to person

Page 62: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

62

(Source: http://www.lightningsafety.com)

3) Object (telephone line, plumbing pipes) to a person in contact with the appliance

Effects of Lightning

• Fires o Fires may occur in structures such as

storage and processing units, aircraft and electrical infrastructure and components.

o Forest fires may be initiated by lightning. Half the wildfires in the western U.S. are caused by lightning.

• Injury and death to people o 85% of lightning victims are children and

young men ages 10 to 35. o 25% of victims die and 70% of survivors

suffer long term effects.

Figure 19. Lightning Strike Victims, Denoted Effects

Lightning Strike Victims, Denoted Effects Frequency 25% or greater

Memory Deficits & Loss

52% **

Depression 32% *

Attention Deficits 41% **

Inability to Sit Long

32%

Sleep Disturbance 44% *

External Burns 32%

Numbness/ Parathesias

36% **

Severe Headaches

32% **

Dizziness 38% *

Fear of Crowds 29% *

Easily Fatigued 37% *

Storm Phobia 29% *

Stiffness in Joints 35% Inability to Cope 29% *

Irritability/ Temper Loss

34% *

General Weakness

29% **

Photophobia 34% Unable to Work 29% **

Loss of Strength/Weakness

34% **

Reduced Libido 26% *

Muscle Spasms 34% Confusion 25% **

Chronic Fatigue 32% *

Coordination Problems

28% **

Hearing Loss 25% * Denotes Psychological ** Denotes Psychological or Organic No Asterisk Denotes Organic

Page 63: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

63

4.1.12 Severe Winter Storm Description A winter storm can range from moderate snow over a few hours to blizzard conditions with blinding wind-driven snow, sleet and/or ice that lasts several days. Some winter storms may be large enough to affect several states while others may affect only a single community. All winter storms are accompanied by low temperatures and blowing snow, which can severely reduce visibility. A severe winter storm is defined as an event that drops four or more inches of snow during a 12-hour period or 6 or more inches during a 24 hour span. All winter storms make driving and walking extremely hazardous. The aftermath of a winter storm can impact a community or region for days, weeks, or months. Types

• Blizzards are by far the most dangerous of all winter storms. They are characterized by temperatures below twenty degrees Fahrenheit and winds of at least 35 miles per hour. In addition to the temperatures and winds, a blizzard must have a sufficient amount of falling or blowing snow. The snow must reduce visibility to one-quarter mile or less for at least three hours. With high winds and heavy snow, these storms can punish residents throughout much of the U.S. during the winter months each year. In

Mid-March of 1993, a major blizzard struck the Eastern U.S., including parts of Kentucky.

• Ice storms occur when freezing rain falls from

clouds and freezes immediately on impact. Ice storms occur when cold air at the surface is overridden by warm, moist air at higher altitudes. As the warm air advances and is lifted over the cold air, precipitation begins falling as rain at high altitudes then becomes super cooled as it passes through the cold air mass below, and, in turn, freezes upon contact with chilled surfaces at temperatures of 32º F or below. In extreme cases, ice may accumulate several inches thick, though just a thin coating is often enough to do severe damage.

Winter Storm Facts

• Winter storms have been known to occur in the time period between the end of October and the end of March.

• Every state in the continental U.S. and Alaska has been impacted by severe winter storms.

• The super-storm of March 1993 caused over $2 billion in property damage in twenty states and Washington D.C. At least 79 deaths and 600 injuries were attributed to the storm.

Page 64: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

64

Possible Effects Storm effects such as power outages, extreme cold, flooding, and snow accumulation can cause hazardous conditions and hidden problems, including the following:

• Power outages can result when snow and ice accumulation on trees cause branches and trunks to break and fall onto vulnerable power lines. Blackouts vary in size from one street to an entire city.

• Extreme cold temperatures may lead to frozen

water mains and pipes, damaged car engines, and prolonged exposure to cold resulting in frostbite.

• Flooding may occur after precipitation has

accumulated and then temperatures rise once again which melts snow and ice. In turn, as more snow and ice accumulate the threat of flooding increases.

• Snow and ice accumulation on roadways can

cause severe transportation problems in the form of extremely hazardous roadway conditions with vehicles losing control, collisions, and road closures.

Page 65: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

65

(Source: FEMA State and Local Mitigation Planning How-To-Guide: Understanding Your Risks)

4.1.13 Tornado Description A tornado is a violent windstorm characterized by a twisting, funnel-shaped cloud. It is spawned by a thunderstorm (or sometimes as a result of a hurricane) and produced when cool air overrides a layer of warm air, forcing the warm air to rise rapidly. The damage from a tornado is a result of the high wind velocity (up to 250 mph) and wind-blown debris with paths that can be in excess of one mile wide and fifty miles long. They have been known to blow off roofs of houses, move cars and tractor trailers, and completely demolish homes. Tornado season is generally March through August, although tornadoes can occur at any time of year. They tend to occur in the afternoons and evenings; over 80 percent of all tornadoes strike between noon and midnight. Types The magnitude of a tornado is categorized by its damage pattern (i.e. path) and its wind velocity, according to the Fujita-Pearson Tornado Measurement Scale. This scale is the only widely used rating method. Its aim is to validate classification by relating the degree of damage to the intensity of the wind.

Figure 20. The Fujita-Pearson Tornado Measurement Scale

The Fujita-Pearson Tornado Measurement Scale Fujita Scale

Estimated Wind

Speed (mph)

Typical Damage

F0 < 73 Light Damage - Some damage to chimneys; branches broken off trees; shallow-rooted trees pushed over; signboards damaged.

F1 73 - 112 Moderate Damage - Peels surface off roofs; mobile homes pushed off foundations or overturned; moving autos blown off roads.

F2 113 - 157 Considerable Damage - Roofs torn off frame houses; mobile homes demolished; boxcars overturned; large trees snapped or uprooted; light object missiles generated; cars lifted off ground.

F3 158 - 206 Severe Damage - Roofs and some walls torn off well-constructed houses; trains overturned; most trees in forest uprooted; heavy cars lifted off the ground and thrown.

F4 207 - 260 Devastating Damage - Well-constructed houses leveled; structures with weak foundations blown away some distance; cars thrown and large missiles generated.

F5 261 - 318 Incredible Damage - Strong frame houses leveled off foundations and swept away; automobile-sized missiles fly through the air in excess of 100 meters (109 yards); trees debarked; incredible phenomena will occur.

Page 66: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

66

Facts

• World-wide, about 1,000 tornadoes are generated by severe thunderstorms each year.

• Earthquake-induced fires and wildfires may also

produce tornadoes. • A tornado can move as fast as 125 mph with

internal winds speeds exceeding 300 mph. • Over the past 25 years, more than 100 federal

disaster declarations included damage associated with tornadoes.

• Powerful tornadoes have lifted and moved

objects weighing more than 300 tons a distance of thirty feet and have tossed homes greater than 300 feet way from their foundations.

• On April 3, 1974, 148 tornadoes in 13 states

killed 315 people. This was the largest recorded tornadic event in history.

• The path of a single tornado can be dozens of

miles long, but tornadoes rarely last longer than 30 minutes.

• Effects of tornadoes may include crop and

property damage, power outages, environmental degradation, injury and death.

Page 67: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

67

4.1.14 Wildfire Description A wildfire is an unplanned fire, a term which includes grass fires, forest fires, and scrub fires either man made or natural in origin. There are three different classes of wildland fires. Types

• Surface fires are the most common type and burn along the floor of a forest, moving slowly and killing or damaging trees.

• Ground fires are usually started by lightning and burn on or below the forest floor.

• Crown fires spread rapidly by wind and move quickly by jumping along the tops of trees.

• Spotting can be produced by crown fires as well as wind and topography conditions. Large burning embers are thrown ahead of the main fire. Once spotting begins, the fire will be very difficult to control.

Wildland fires are usually signaled by dense smoke that fills the area for miles around. The average forest fire kills most trees up to 3-4 inches in diameter, in the area burned. These trees represent approximately 20 years of growth. In the case of up-slope burning, under severe conditions, almost every tree is killed regardless of size or type. When the trees are burned and everything is killed, then the forest is

slow to reestablish itself, because of the loss of these young seedlings, saplings, pole and sawtimber trees. Included in the destruction by fires are the leaf and other litter on the forest floor. This exposes the soil to erosive forces, allowing rainstorms to wear away the naked soil and wash silt and debris downhill, which will clog the streams and damage fertile farmlands in the valleys. Once the litter and humus (spongy layer of decaying matter) is destroyed, water flows more swiftly to the valleys and increases flood danger. Other consequences of wildfires are the death of and loss of habitat for the forest’s wildlife. Even when the adult animals escape, the young are left behind to perish. The heaviest wildlife lost is felt by game birds since they have ground nesting habits. Fish life also suffers as a result of the removal of stream shade and the loss of insect and plant food is destroyed by silt and lye from wood ashes washed down from burned hillsides. Wildfire Fuel Categories

• Light fuels such as shrubs, grasses, leaves, and pine needles (any fuel having a diameter of one-half inch or less) burn rapidly and are quickly ignited because they are surrounded by plenty of oxygen. Fires in light fuels spread rapidly but burn out quickly, are easily extinguished, and fuel moisture changes more rapidly than in heavier fuels.

Page 68: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

68

• Heavy fuels such as limbs, logs, and tree trunks (any fuel one-half inch or larger in diameter) warm more slowly than light fuels, and the interiors are exposed to oxygen only after the outer portion is burned.

• Uniform fuels include all of the fuels distributed

continuously over an area. Areas containing a network of fuels that connect with each other to provide a continuous path for a fire to spread are included in this category.

• Patchy fuels include all fuels distributed unevenly

over an area, or as areas of fuel with definite breaks or barriers present, such as patches of rock outcroppings, bare ground, swamps, or areas where the dominant type of fuel is much less combustible.

• Ground fuels are all of the combustible materials

lying beneath the surface including deep duff, tree roots, rotten buried logs, and other organic material.

• Surface fuels are all of the combustible materials

lying on or immediately above the ground, including needles or leaves, duff, grass, small deadwood, downed logs, stumps, large limbs, and low shrubs.

• Aerial fuels are all of the green and dead

materials located in the upper canopy, including

tree branches and crowns, snags, hanging moss, and tall shrubs.

Fuel Types

• Grass. Found in most areas, but grass is more dominant as a fuel in desert and range areas where other types of fuel are less prevalent. It can become prevalent in the years after a fire in formerly timbered areas.

• Shrub (brush). Shrub is found throughout most

areas of the U.S. Some examples of highly flammable shrub fuels are the palmetto/ gallberry in the Southeast, sagebrush in the Great Basin, and chaparral in the Southwest.

• Timber litter. This type of fuel is most dominant

in mountainous topography, especially in the Northwest.

• Logging slash. This fuel is found throughout the

country. It is the debris left after logging, pruning, thinning, or shrub-cutting operations. It may include logs, chunks, bark, branches, stumps, and broken understory trees or shrubs.

Fuel Characteristics

• Fuel moisture is the amount of water in a fuel. This measurement is expressed as a percentage. The higher the percentage, the greater the content of moisture within the fuel.

Page 69: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

69

Fires in the United States (1993-2002)

7345

78407

9

9225

0

8388

6

8104

3

6619

6

9636

3

8223

4

7910

7

5881

0

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

Year

Num

ber o

f Fire

s

Acres Burned in the United States (1993-2002)

5289

190

2329

704

2856

959

6065

998

1840

546

4073

579

1797

674

7383

493

3570

911

7184

712

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

Year

Num

ber o

f Acr

es B

urne

d

(Source: United States Forest Service)

How well a fuel will ignite and burn is dependent, to a large extent, on its moisture content. Dry fuels will ignite and burn much more easily than the same fuels when they are wet (contain a high moisture content). As a fuel's moisture content increases, the amount of heat required to ignite and burn that fuel also increases. Light fuels take on and lose moisture faster than heavier fuels. Wet fuels have high moisture content because of exposure to precipitation or high relative humidity, while dry fuels have low moisture content because of prolonged exposure to sunshine, dry winds, drought, or low relative humidity.

Figure 21: Fires in the United States

Figure 22. Acres Burned in the United States

Page 70: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

70

Wildfire Facts

• Homeowners can do much to help save their homes from wildfires, such as constructing the roof and exterior structure of a dwelling with non- combustible or fire resistant materials such as tile, slate, sheet iron, aluminum, brick or stone.

• In 2002, 6.9 million acres were burned in

wildfires in the U.S., making it the fourth worst wildfire season since 1960.

• The worst wildfire season, in terms of number of

acres burned, was 2000 when wildfires burned 8.4 million acres. The second and third worst seasons were in 1988 and 1963.

• While it was U.S. policy for most of the 20th

century to suppress wildfires, fires actually benefit the ecosystem: The effects of fire can retard or accelerate the natural development of plant communities, alter species diversity and change nutrient flows.

• More than 100 years of suppressing fires,

combined with past land-use practices, have resulted in a heavy buildup of dead vegetation, dense stands of trees, a shift to species that have not evolved and adapted to fire, and occasionally an increase in non-native, fire-prone plants. Because of these conditions, today's

fires tend to be larger, burn hotter, and spread farther and faster, making them more severe.

• Government scientists have also concluded that

"fire severity has generally increased and fire frequency has generally decreased over the last 200 years. The primary causative factors behind fire regime changes are effective fire prevention and suppression strategies, selection and regeneration cutting, domestic livestock grazing, and the introduction of exotic plants.”

• Scientific analysis of the 2000 fire season

revealed that the vast majority of burned acres were located in previously logged and roaded areas, not in road-less or wilderness areas.

• The Endangered Species Act permits federal

officials to take actions that might impact endangered species or their habitat during times of emergency, including wildfire emergencies. Water can be taken from a river without permission from wildlife agencies during emergencies.

• There is consensus in the scientific literature

dealing with fire and forest management that forests in un-roaded, un-logged areas have the most fire resiliency and present a lower fire risk compared to other areas.

Page 71: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

71

• The Congressional Research Service, in an August 2000 report analyzing the impact of the fires in 2000, concluded, "Timber harvesting removes the relatively large diameter wood that can be converted into wood products, but leaves behind the small material, especially twigs and needles. The concentration of these ‘fine fuels’ on the forest floor increases the rate of spread of wildfires."

• In 1996, U.S. government scientists issued the

Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project Report, concluding that, "Timber harvest, through its effects on forest structure, local microclimate and fuel accumulation, has increased fire severity more than any other recent human activity."

• Fire ecologists and most forest scientists agree

that long-term ecological restoration with careful fire reintroduction (not increased resource extraction or aggressive fire suppression) holds the best hope of preventing future large-scale severe wildfires in fire-dependent ecosystems of the interior West.

• Many species depend on fires to improve

habitat, recycle nutrients and maintain diverse habitats.

• Humans, either through negligence, accident, or

intentional arson, have caused approximately 90% of all wildfires in the last decade. Accidental and negligent acts include unattended campfires, sparks, burning debris, and irresponsibly discarded cigarettes. The

remaining 10% of fires are mostly caused by lightning, but may also be caused by other acts of nature such as volcanic eruptions or earthquakes.

Figure 24: USFS Emergency Fire Suppression

(Source: United States Forest Service *All dollar amounts in 1999 dollars)

USFS Emergency Fire Suppression

$0.00

$200.00

$400.00

$600.00

$800.00

$1,000.00

$1,200.00

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

Year

Cos

t Per

Acr

e B

urne

d

Page 72: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

72

4.2 Past Presidential Declarations In 1988, the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 5121-5206, was enacted to support state and local governments and their citizens when disasters overwhelm them. This law, as amended, establishes a process for requesting and obtaining a presidential disaster declaration, defines the type and scope of assistance available from the federal government, and sets the conditions for obtaining that assistance. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), now part of the Emergency Preparedness and Response (EPR) Directorate of the Department of Homeland Security, is tasked with coordinating the response. The state of Kentucky has obtained 51 presidential disaster declarations for damages caused by natural hazard events. The following chart highlights each date of disaster declaration, and the type(s) of natural hazards:

Page 73: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

73

Figure 25. FEMA Presidential Declarations in Kentucky 1957 - 2009

Type of Natural Hazard

Number Declared Dam

Fai

lure

Dro

ught

Earth

quak

e

Extre

me

Hea

t

Floo

d

Hai

lsto

rm

Kars

t/Sin

khol

e

Min

e Su

bsid

ence

Land

slid

e

Seve

re S

torm

Torn

ado

Wild

fire

Win

ter S

torm

66 1/31/1957 x 128 3/12/1962 x 148 3/13/1963 x x 163 3/17/1964 x x 226 3/27/1967 x x 237 5/4/1968

x x

265 7/15/1969

x

x

282 2/2/1970 x 288 6/5/1970 x x 305 5/10/1971 x 332 5/15/1972 x 381 5/11/1973 x x 420 4/4/1974 x 461 3/29/1975

x

x

3009 4/4/1975

x

468 5/24/1975 x x 529 4/6/1977 x x 568 12/12/1978 x x 592 7/19/1979 x x 670 9/29/1982 x 705 5/15/1984 x x 821 2/24/1989

x

x

834 6/30/1989

x

x

846 10/30/1989 x x x

Page 74: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

74

Figure 25. FEMA Presidential Declarations in Kentucky 1957 - 2009

Type of Natural Hazard

Number Declared Dam

Fai

lure

Dro

ught

Earth

quak

e

Extre

me

Hea

t

Floo

d

Hai

lsto

rm

Kars

t/Sin

khol

e

Min

e Su

bsid

ence

Land

slid

e

Seve

re S

torm

Torn

ado

Wild

fire

Win

ter S

torm

893 1/29/1991 x x 3104 3/16/1993 x 1018 3/16/1994 x 1055 6/13/1995 x x x 1089 1/13/1996 x x 1117 6/1/1996

x x

1163 3/4/1997

x

x

1207 3/3/1998 x 1216 4/29/1998 x x x 1310 1/10/2000 x x x 1320 2/28/2000 x x 1388 8/15/2001 x x 1407 4/4/2002 x x 1414 5/7/2002

x

x x

1454 3/14/2003

x 1471 6/3/2003 x x x x 1475 7/2/2003 x x x x 1523 6/10/2004 x x x x 1537 8/6/2004 x x 1578 2/8/2005 x 3231 9/10/2005 x x 1617 12/1/2005

x x

1703 5/25/2007

x

x x

1746 2/21/2008 x x x x

Page 75: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

75

Figure 25. FEMA Presidential Declarations in Kentucky 1957 - 2009

Type of Natural Hazard

Number Declared Dam

Fai

lure

Dro

ught

Earth

quak

e

Extre

me

Hea

t

Floo

d

Hai

lsto

rm

Kars

t/Sin

khol

e

Min

e Su

bsid

ence

Land

slid

e

Seve

re S

torm

Torn

ado

Wild

fire

Win

ter S

torm

1802 10/9/2008 x 3302 1/28/2009 x 1818 2/6/2009 x x

Page 76: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

76

4.3 Profiles of Hazard Events Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(i): [The risk assessment shall include a] description of the … location and extent of all natural hazards that can affect the jurisdiction. The plan shall include information on previous occurrences of hazard events and on the probability of future hazard events. The following section contains a detailed profile for each of the 13 identified natural hazards that affect UK:

• Dam Failure • Drought • Earthquake • Extreme Heat • Flood • Hailstorm • Karst/Sinkhole • Mine Subsidence • Landslide • Severe Storm • Tornado • Wildfire • Winter Storm

The hazard profile section for UK is broken down into two categories: main campus and non-campus facilities. Main Campus UK’s main campus is located in Lexington, KY. For the purposes of gathering general hazard event information

that may have affected UK’s main campus, information is derived from:

• LFUCG Hazard Mitigation Plan; • Lexington Herald-Leader; and • NOAA.

More specific hazard event information that directly affected UK’s main campus was derived from:

• UK Board of Trustees Minutes (1862-2007); • UK UPO Claim Log; and • Lexington Herald-Leader.

Non-Campus Facilities UK non-campus facilities are located in each of the 120 counties in Kentucky. UK non-campus facilities include research farms, the Robinson Forest, substations, 4-H camps, Adena Park, Agricultural Extension Offices, and other medical and research facilities. For the purposes of gathering general hazard event information that may have affected UK’s non-campus facilities, information is derived from:

• Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan; • Kentucky Climate Center; • Lexington Herald-Leader; and • NOAA

More specific hazard event information that directly affected UK’s non-campus facilities was derived from:

Page 77: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

77

• UK Board of Trustees Minutes (1862-2007) • UK UPO Claim Log; • Lexington Herald-Leader; and • UK Agricultural Extension Offices.

Page 78: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

78

4.3.1 Dam Failure

Figure 26. SUMMARY OF DAM FAILURE RISK FACTORS

Period of occurrence: At any time.

Probability of event(s):

Dams that fail, historically, have some deficiency which caused the failure. Chance of failure increases with heavy rain or earthquake.

Warning time: Minimal, depends on frequency of inspection.

Potential impact(s): Impacts human life and public safety.

Cause injury or death Injury and risk of multiple deaths.

Potential facility shutdown 30 days or more. Kentucky statute KRS 150.100 defines a dam as any artificial barrier including appurtenant works that do, or can, impound or divert water and:

1) Is 25 feet or more high from the natural bed of the stream or watercourse at the downstream toe of the barrier, as determined by the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Cabinet;

2) Has or will have an impounding capacity of 50 acre feet or more at the maximum water storage elevation.

Since 1948, anyone in Kentucky proposing to construct a dam has been required to submit a plan to the state

for review in order to obtain a permit. In 1966, Kentucky adopted a set of guidelines for evaluating dams. In 1974, the permit system was revised to include regular state inspection of dams. KRS 150.295 directs the Secretary of the Kentucky Environment and Public Protection Cabinet to inspect dams and reservoirs on a regular schedule. Continued growth of the built environment downstream of these dams exposes more structures and population to a dam failure. When a dam is moved into a higher risk class the owner is responsible for improvements and maintenance as required by state guidelines. Downstream growth and required improvements to dams should be continually monitored. Historical Impact Main Campus According to the LFUCG Hazard Mitigation Plan, there are 18 dams located in Lexington-Fayette County. Each dam is ranked according to Class (see table below).

Figure 27. Inventory of Dams in Lexington-Fayette County

Inventory of Dams in Lexington-Fayette County

County Class A (low)

Class B (moderate)

Class C (high)

Fayette 10 2 6

Page 79: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

79

There are no reported dam failures within Lexington-Fayette County and UK’s main campus has not been affected by the result of a dam failure. Non-Campus Facilities According to the Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan, the state of Kentucky has 652 low hazard dams, 211 moderate hazard dams, and 175 high hazard dams (these numbers do not include federal dams or dams on active surface mining areas). See Appendix 9 for Status of Dams in Kentucky by County. In Kentucky, there have been six dam failures reported to the National Performance Dam Program (see figure 28 below.) Figure 28. Kentucky Dam Failures Dam Name Incident Date Incident Type Failure Caulk Lake Dam 12/16/1973 Seepage Yes East Fork Pond River FRS #4.1 12/8/1978

Foundation Failure Yes

Camp Ernst Dam 9/15/1978 Embankment Slide Unknown

Samsel 2/2/1979 Seepage No Eastover Mining Company Dam 12/18/1981 Sabotage/Other Yes Unnamed Dam 6/11/1905 Overtopping Yes

(Sources: http://kyclim.wku.edu and http://ncdc.noaa.gov) There are no reported dam failures in the state of Kentucky that have affected UK’s non-campus facilities.

For future updates, the university should examine the proximity of Non-Campus Facilities to dams located throughout the state.

Page 80: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

80

4.3.2 Drought

Figure 29. SUMMARY OF DROUGHT RISK FACTORS

Period of occurrence: Summer months or extended periods of no precipitation.

Probability of event(s): Infrequent. Warning time: Weeks.

Potential impact(s):

Droughts can lead to economic losses such as unemployment, decreased land values, and Agro-business losses. Minimal risk of damage or cracking to structural foundation, due to soils.

Cause injury or death Slight chance of injury and risk of death.

Potential facility shutdown None to slight chance. Historical Impact Main Campus

According to the LFUCG Hazard Mitigation Plan, the county occasionally experiences drought conditions due to heat and low rainfall. Vulnerability to UK will be according to severity of the drought, which depends upon the degree of moisture deficiency and the duration and the size of the affected area. Due to the ample water resources (surface and ground water), Lexington-Fayette County does not normally experience severe droughts. However, recent climate predictions indicate that droughts may continue to occur in the future.

According to the Kentucky Climate Center, there have been 4 major recorded drought occurrences in Lexington-Fayette County since 1930. There were no injuries or deaths reported as a result of these droughts. Figure 30. LFUCG Recorded Drought Events

LFUCG Recorded Drought Events

Time Period Location (Region) PDSI Rating

Crop Losses

May 1930 - December 1931

Lexington-Fayette County(Bluegrass)

-4.73 N/A

Fall 1939 - Spring 1942

Lexington-Fayette County(Bluegrass)

-3.97 N/A

Summer 1952 - Winter 1955

Lexington-Fayette County(Bluegrass)

N/A NA

Summer-Fall 1999

Lexington-Fayette County

N/A N/A

(Sources: http://kyclim.wku.edu) and http://ncdc.noaa.gov) Although UK’s main campus may have been indirectly affected by the above mentioned drought conditions, there are no reported specific drought occurrences that have affected the main campus. Non-Campus Facilities According to the Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan, since 1950, Kentucky officially experienced four severe droughts: 1952-1955, 1963-1964, 1988 and 1999-2001. Prior to 1950, the state had experienced nine severe droughts. The table below displays that

Page 81: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

81

average annual Palmer Severity Drought Index (PSDI) averages compared to the deviation of the annual precipitation from the average. The PSDI uses data for precipitation, temperature and evapotranspiration (the water returned to the atmosphere through the combined actions of evaporation and plant growth) to calculate a number that can be compared across different times and locations. According to NOAA, there have been 16 recorded drought occurrences in Kentucky since 1996. Only two of these droughts caused serious damage to agricultural crops. A 1996 drought affected 20 counties in western Kentucky with crop damage assessed at $154 million. In 2002, 22 counties were affected with losses assessed at $70 million. There were no injuries or deaths reported as a result of these droughts. Figure 31. Significant Drought Events in KY

Significant Drought Events in Kentucky

Time Period Location (region)

PDSI Rating

Crop Losses

May 1930- Dec. 1931

Bluegrass, Central, East, West -4.73 N/A

Fall 1939 - Spring 1942

Bluegrass, Central, East -3.97 N/A

Summer 1952 - Winter 1955

Bluegrass, Central, West N/A N/A

Summer 1996 West N/A $154.0 M Summer 2002 West N/A $70.0 M

(Sources: http://kyclim.wku.edu) and http://ncdc.noaa.gov)

The 100-year map for 1895 to 1995 (to the right), illustrates the percent of time in severe and extreme drought for the United States. In this 100-year map, Figures 32 & 33. Palmer Drought Severity Index

Page 82: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

82

Kentucky is divided into four climate zones: Western, Central, Bluegrass, and East. The PDSI for 1895 to 1995 is in the range of 5% to 9.99% for the Central, Bluegrass and East climate zones, and 10% to 14.9% for the West climate zone. The 10-year map for 1985 to 1995 illustrates the percent of time in severe and extreme drought for the United States. In this 10-year map, the PSDI is 5% to 9.99% for the Bluegrass, and West climate zones, and 0.10% to 4.99% for the Central and East climate zones. Following a search for more specific information on drought events that have affected UK non-campus facilities, three records were found: • Summer 1913 – “Disastrous drought throughout

Kentucky during the Summer of 1913, which so reduced the income of the farmers of Kentucky as to make it necessary for them to economize.”(Minutes of the UK Board of Trustees)

• 1983-1984 – For this timeframe the university increased the anticipated Livestock Disposal Request. The request was increased due to larger quantities of animals that were sold than originally was anticipated. There was a pasture shortage, and lower grain and feed production due to severe summer drought. (Minutes of the UK Board of Trustees)

• October 3, 2007 – U.S. Department of Agriculture declared the entire state a disaster area because of damage done by the summer’s hot, dry weather. (Lexington Herald-Leader)

Page 83: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

83

4.3.3 Earthquake

Historical Impact Main Campus According to the LFUCG Hazard Mitigation Plan, Lexington-Fayette County is on and near numerous fault lines; most notably the New Madrid fault which is 300 miles away. There is a moderate risk of minor earthquake activity within the Lexington-Fayette region at any time. Specific damages from an earthquake in the county would vary greatly depending on the magnitude of the earthquake and the location of its epicenter.

The estimated damage from a quake on the New Madrid fault is expected to be minor. In Lexington the ground would shake very strongly resulting in walls cracking and plaster falling and could result in minor structural damage particularly to older or poorly designed buildings, bridges, and roads. While Lexington-Fayette County lies within 300 miles of the New Madrid Seismic Zone, there are also many smaller fault lines running throughout the state and the county. An earthquake in this zone or in central Kentucky could damage structures, cause injuries, and impact the economy in the long-term, including disruption of bridges, rail lines, communications, power, gas, water utilities, food and medical supplies, natural gas, and oil lines. Although UK’s main campus may have felt past earthquake hazard events, there are no reported damages to main campus facilities. Non-Campus Facilities According to the Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan, there are several seismic zones in and around the state; the most significant is the New Madrid Seismic Zone located at the border of western Kentucky. Scientists estimate that the probability of a magnitude 6 to 7 earthquake occurring in this seismic zone within the next 50 years is higher than 90%. Below is a general listing of notable earthquake events that have affected the state of Kentucky and may have affected UK non-campus facilities:

Figure 34. SUMMARY OF EARTHQUAKE RISK FACTORS Period of occurrence: Year-round. Probability of event(s): Infrequent.

Warning time: None.

Potential impact(s):

Impacts human life, health, and public safety. Utility damage and outages, infrastructure damage (transportation and communication systems), structural damage, fire, damaged or destroyed critical facilities, and hazardous material releases. Can cause severe transportation problems and make travel extremely dangerous.

Cause injury or death Injury and risk of multiple deaths. Potential facility shutdown Months.

Page 84: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

84

• December 15, 1811 - An earthquake struck at the New Madrid fault in western Kentucky. The following quote is taken from newspaper articles published after the December 16, 1811 quake "About half after two o'clock, yesterday morning, a severe shock of an earthquake was felt at this place: the earth vibrated two or three times in a second, which continued for several minutes, and so great was the shaking that the windows were agitated equal to what they would have been in a hard gust of wind." (Kentucky Gazette, Lexington, KY)

• February 7, 1812 - Another large earthquake struck at the New Madrid Fault. The effects in Lexington were described as severe, but not as having caused any material damage. (Kentucky Gazette, Lexington, KY)

• March 12, 1878 - A severe shock was reported at Columbus, Kentucky and a section of the bluff along the Mississippi River caved. (Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan)

• December 7, 1915 - A sharp earthquake with an epicenter near the mouth of the Ohio River occurred on December 7, 1915. Buildings were strongly shaken, windows and dishes rattled, and loose objects were shaken in western Kentucky and adjoining regions (Intensity V, VI). The total effected area covered 60,000 square miles. (Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan)

• October 26, 1916 - An earthquake at Mayfield was reported to have shaken pictures from walls. (Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan)

• December 18, 1916 - Hickman, the site of the 1841 earthquake, experienced another strong shock. Reports indicated bricks were shaken

from chimneys at Hickman and New Madrid, Missouri (Intensity VI, VII). (Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan)

• March 2, 1924 - An earthquake occurred near the point of the December 1915 event. No damage was reported and the affected area was significantly less at about 15,000 square miles. (Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan)

• September 2, 1925 - A broad area of Kentucky, Illinois, Indiana and Tennessee, estimated at 75,000 square miles, was affected by an earthquake. It was apparently centered near Henderson, Kentucky where some landslides

Figure 35. Inventory of Historic Earthquakes relevant to UK’s Main Campus and Non-Campus Facilities

Date Intensity (Modified Mercali)

Magnitude (Richter Scale)

Origin

12/16/1811 V New Madrid Seismic Zone

12/16/1811 F New Madrid Seismic Zone

1/23/1812 IV New Madrid Seismic Zone

2/07/1812 VI New Madrid Seismic Zone

1/4/1843 6.0 New Madrid Seismic Zone

2/28/1854 Lexington, Fayette Co. 2/20/1869 IV Lexington, Fayette Co.

10/31/1895 6.2 New Madrid Seismic Zone

7/27/1980 V 5.1 Sharpsburg, Bath Co

Page 85: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

85

were noted. In Louisville, about 100 miles away, a chimney fell and a house reportedly sank. (Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan)

• January 1, 1954 - Slight damage resulted from an earthquake (Intensity VI) near Middlesboro, KY. The tremor caused general alarm among the population and was felt in Tennessee, North Carolina, and Virginia. (Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan)

• November 9, 1958 – An earthquake centered in southern Illinois, caused widespread damage over nearby areas of Indiana, Kentucky and Missouri. Considerable masonry damage was sustained in Henderson, Kentucky, about 50 miles east-southeast of the epicenter. Intensity VII damage was also reported from Poole, Smith Mills and Uniontown. (Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan)

• November 9, 1968 - The strongest earthquake since 1895 originated in Southern Illinois and was felt in 23 states including Kentucky. (Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan)

• July 27, 1980 – Sharpsburg, in the central part of the state, was struck by an earthquake that measured 5.1 on the Richter scale. (Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan)

• June 13, 2002 – Earthquake struck at 1:37 p.m., registered a magnitude of 5.0. The epicenter was 10 miles northwest of Evansville, Indiana. Kentucky authorities received no reports of damage, although the quake was felt across much of the state, most notably in Western Kentucky. (Lexington Herald-Leader)

Although UK’s non-campus facilities may have felt the above earthquake hazard events, there are no reported specific damages to the non-campus facilities.

• June 2, 2005 – 4.0 Magnitude Earthquake occurred in the New Madrid Seismic Zone near Ridgelyh, TN. (Kentucky Geological Survey)

• April 18, 2008 – 5.2 Magnitude Earthquake

occurred in Southern Illinois near Bellmont, Illinois. Ground shaking attributed to the magnitude 5.2 event has been reported from northern Georgia to Wisconsin. (Kentucky Geological Survey)

• June 5, 2008 - 3.6 Magnitude Earthquake

occurred in Southern Illinois near Mount Carmel, Illinois. (Kentucky Geological Survey)

• January 27, 2009 – 3.1 Magnitude earthquake

near Williamsburg, Kentucky. The earthquake was recorded on the Lexington Instrument in the Kentucky Seismic and Strong Motion Network. (Kentucky Geological Survey)

Page 86: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

86

(Kentucky Climate Center: Hot Spots in Kentucky. Retrieved March 31, 2004 from http://kyclim.wku.edu/climate

4.3.4 Extreme Heat Main Campus According to the Lexington Herald-Leader, there has been one notable occurrence of extreme heat in the Lexington-Fayette County area:

• September 25, 2007 – The temperature in Lexington reached 93 degrees, breaking a record. Many commissioners place restrictions on water usage. (Lexington Herald-Leader)

There were no records of specific damages to the main campus; however other notable extreme heat events for the Non-Campus Facilities section may have affected UK’s main campus in Lexington, KY Non-Campus Facilities According to the Kentucky Climate Center, data from a thirty-year time span of 1970-1999 for 52 in-state and 13 out-of-state sites showed the mean amount of days that temperatures rose to or beyond 90°F. The mean values ranged from 14 days in Oneida, TN to 68 days in Gilbertsville, KY. The following map of Kentucky shows the normal occurrence of days when temperatures equal or exceed 90°F. The distribution of where these temperatures most commonly occur may be helpful in decisions for home design, power demands, conservation of water, and in scheduling locations for outdoor events and activities.

Figure 36. Mean Number of Days about 90°F

A temperature of 90°F is significant in that it ranks at the "caution" level of the NOAA's Apparent Temperature chart even if humidity is not a factor. This chart is a quick way to determine the atmospheric temperature that your body senses. For example, an air temperature of 90°F combined with a relative humidity of 60% causes your body to sense a temperature of 100°F. Apparent temperatures may sometimes be about 15° to 20°F higher or even as much as 30°F higher (unventilated city areas), during periods of "heat waves." (NOAA, 1980)

Page 87: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

87

(Kentucky Climate Center: State Climatologist Emeritus for Kentucky) (Retrieved February 23, 2009 from http://kyclim.wku.edu/factsheets/recHighTemp.htm )

While only a relatively small number of maximum temperature records were set, the combination of high heat, record dew points, strong solar inputs, and weak winds led to a dangerous situation for people. Before it was over, some 232 deaths were attributed to the heat

over 9 states, including 8 in Kentucky. There were additional health, infrastructure, and economic impacts that were quite significant. The Kentucky Climate Center also provided significant information on extreme heat conditions in Kentucky, beginning in the early 20th Century:

• July 5 – August 9, 1930 - Beginning on July 5, 1930 in Lovelaceville in McCracken County, observed nine consecutive days of over one hundred degree readings. During the fourth week of July of the same year, a wave of excess heat arrived for the third time during the month. After consecutive days of 103°F and 110°F, Greensburg established a Kentucky record high temperature of 114°F on July 28, 1930. Among the other high temperatures that day were 113°F at Bowling Green, 112°F at Bardstown, Lowelaceville and Middlesboro, and 111°F at Anchorage and Franklin. Of all the stations reporting that day in Kentucky, only Pike County’s Dorton with 99° F failed to reach triple digits. The heat was continued through 9 August raising Lovelaceville’s total days about 100°F to thirty. (Kentucky Climate Center)

• Summer 1952 – Princeton experienced thirty-five consecutive days with temperatures of 90°F or higher. Their final 90°F of the year occurred on October 1 and brought their summer total to 95 days of 90°F or higher. (Kentucky Climate Center)

Figure 37. Kentucky Record Maximum Temperatures

Date Record

High Location Data Source

Month and Day Indicated January 20, 1907 83°F Loretto Kentucky Section,

Climatological Service of the Weather Bureau, District 3, Ohio Valley

February 11, 1890 86°F Princeton Monthly Bulletin, Kentucky State Weather Service

March 24, 1929 94°F Hopkinsville Climatological Data, Kentucky

April 24, 1925 98°F Farmers Climatological Data, Kentucky

May 10, 1896 106°F Ashland Monthly Bulletin, Kentucky State Weather Service

June 29, 1936 110°F St John's Academy

Climatological Data, Kentucky

July 28, 1930 114°F Greensburg Climatological Data, Kentucky

August 5, 1930 113°F St John's Academy

Climatological Data, Kentucky

September 6, 1925 110°F Beaver Dam Climatological Data, Kentucky

October 1, 1953 98°F Frankfort & Hopkinsville

Climatological Data, Kentucky

November 14, 1902 90°F Pikeville Climate & Crop Bulletin, Kentucky Section

December 3, 1982 87°F Pikeville Climatological Data, Kentucky

Page 88: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

88

Although UK’s non-campus facilities may have experienced indirect effects from the above extreme heat hazard events, there were no records of specific damages to the non-campus facilities.

Page 89: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

89

4.3.5 Flood

Historical Impact Main Campus UK’s main campus is located in Lexington-Fayette County. According to the LFUCG Hazard Mitigation Plan, this county-wide area lies within the Kentucky

River Basin watershed. The majority of flooding in Lexington-Fayette County area occurs during the winter and early spring. Figure 39. Kentucky Watersheds

The topography of Lexington-Fayette County area is unique for an urban area of its size, because the urban development does not have a major waterfront area. Lexington-Fayette County’s watersheds generally flow away from the county. Small streams constitute the majority of the floodplains, with a small percentage of riverine floodplain along the Kentucky River. There are 12,142 acres of floodplain within Lexington-Fayette County, of which 8,477 acres are in the low density rural service area and 3,665 acres (30%) fall within the Urban Service Area Boundary. The main campus boundaries are located within Lexington-Fayette County and within three smaller watersheds: Wolf Run watershed, Town Branch watershed, and West Hickman watershed. Town Branch flows in a northerly direction and West Hickman drains to the south.

Figure 38. SUMMARY OF FLOOD RISK FACTORS

Riverine Flooding: any time but primarily January through May

Period of occurrence: Flash floods: anytime, but primarily during summer rains.

Probability of event(s): Highly likely.

Warning time: River flooding – 3 –5 days Flash flooding – minutes to hours Out-of-bank flooding – several hours/days.

Potential impact(s):

Impacts human life, health, and public safety. Utility damage and outages, infrastructure damage (transportation and communication systems), structural damage, fire, damaged or destroyed critical facilities, and hazardous material releases. Can lead to economic losses such as unemployment, decreased land values, and Agro-business losses.

Cause injury or death Injury and risk of multiple deaths. Potential facility shutdown Weeks to months.

Page 90: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

90

More specific information reveals that UK’s main campus has been affected by two notable flood hazard events in the past:

• June 1928 – In June after a heavy rainfall the water on the lower campus reached such a height that the basement floor of the Men’s Gymnasium was flooded to within a foot of the ceiling. The book store stock and the post office fixtures in the building were materially injured. The loss of stock amounted to $21,931.45. The injury to the building from water damage was estimated at $800. (Minutes of the University of Kentucky Board of Trustees)

• 1993/1994 –Basement of ASTECC was flooded with 2’ of water due to two 2” rains on the same day.

• January 22, 2006 – The basement of the

Insectory building flooded due to heavy rains with a total damage estimate of $1,330.50. (UPO Claim Log)

Non-Campus Facilities UK owns or operates Non-Campus Facilities that are located in each of the 120 counties located in Kentucky. These Non-Campus Facilities may be affected by flash flooding and river basin flooding. Below is a general overview of flooding as it affects the entire state of Kentucky, as well as historical flood hazard events that have been recorded by UK.

According to the Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan, flooding is probably the most significant natural hazard in Kentucky. Major flooding occurs within the state almost every year and it is not unusual for several floods to occur in a single year. Recent significant floods occurred in 1973, 1975, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1982, and 1984, three times in 1989, 1991 and 1997. The flood of 1997 led to 101 counties being declared disaster areas. The two most common types of flooding that occur in Kentucky are flash floods and river or riverine floods.

• Flash flooding occurs in all parts of the state as the result of excessive rainfall over a short time. Flash flooding prevails in eastern Kentucky where it is abetted by the region's mountainous terrain, many narrow gorges and many streams and riverbeds. Flash floods can happen any time of the year, but are more prevalent during spring and summer months.

• River basin flooding is more common during

winter and early spring (February to April). This flooding is common along Kentucky's major waterways, particularly the Kentucky, Green, Licking, Ohio and Mississippi Rivers. Cities such as Frankfort, Louisville, Owensboro, and Paducah have been seriously affected by flooding. Every two to three years, serious flooding occurs along one or more of Kentucky's major streams and it is not unusual for this to occur several years in succession. Four of the greatest floods of the Ohio River Valley occurred in 1884, 1913, 1937, and 1997.

Page 91: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

91

An Overview of Kentucky Waters

• 13 Major Drainage Basins • 40 to 50 inches of average rainfall

o Maximum during winter and spring o Minimum during late summer and fall

• 89,431 miles of rivers and streams • 637,000 acres of wetlands • 18 reservoirs over 1000 acres in size • 228,385 acres of publicly owned lakes and

reservoirs Following a search for more specific information on flood hazard events that have affected UK non-campus facilities, five records were found:

• April 1977 – In Bell County, the office was completely flooded and most everything in the office was lost. Damage cost to the facility is unknown. (Agricultural Extension Office)

• May 1984 – In Calloway County, the basement

of the old post office flooded, with damage to the carpets, book cases, publications, copy machine, desks, and chairs. (Agricultural Extension Office)

• May 1984 – In Knott County, the extension office

flooded due to heavy rains. The flooding reached a height of 36 inches. Furniture & materials were damaged beyond repair and total damage costs were $10,000. (Agricultural Extension Office)

• March 1997 – In Pendleton County, the extension office flooded damaging equipment and furniture. Total damage estimate was $80,000. (Agricultural Extension Office)

• 2003 – In Washington County, the extension office meeting room flooded due to heavy rain. Lightning came in on the phone and computers and wind damage occurred. The total damage was $3,860. (Agricultural Extension Office)

For future plan updates, non-campus facility locations should be mapped to show distance and elevation from existing waters and steep slopes.

Page 92: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

92

4.3.6 Hailstorm

Figure 40. SUMMARY OF HAILSTORM RISK FACTORS

Period of occurrence: Year-round.

Probability of event(s): Likely, usually associated with severe thunderstorms.

Warning time: Minutes to hours.

Potential impact(s):

Large hailstorms can include minimal to severe property and crop damage and destruction.

Cause injury or death Injury and slight chance of death. Potential facility shutdown Days.

Historical Impact The effects of large hailstorms can include minimal to severe property and crop damage and destruction. Main Campus According to the LFUCG Hazard Mitigation Plan, at least 35 reported hailstorms have fallen in Lexington-Fayette County from 1960-2000. The following chart provides the dates and descriptions of each hailstorm event that has affect Lexington-Fayette County. No deaths or reported injuries have resulted from hail storms in Lexington-Fayette County, but such incidents remain a possibility.

Figure 41. Hailstorm Events in Lexington-Fayette County 1960-2000 Date Description 8/18/1961 HAIL 5/23/1962 HAIL, LIGHTNING 5/26/1962 HAIL, WIND 100 10 7/23/1963 HAIL 135 13,514

1/20/1964 HAIL, LIGHTNING, SEVERE, STORM/THUNDER STORM, WIND

8/11/1964 HAIL, LIGHTNING, SEVERE, STORM/THUNDER STORM, WIND

12/24/1964 HAIL, LIGHTNING, WIND

7/10/1966 HAIL, LIGHTNING, SEVERE, STORM/THUNDER STORM, WIND

7/13/1966 HAIL, LIGHTNING, WIND 7/14/1966 HAIL, LIGHTNING, WIND 7/22/1967 HAIL, LIGHTNING, SEVERE, WIND 7/10/1968 HAIL, WIND

8/8/1968 HAIL, LIGHTNING, SEVERE, STORM/THUNDER STORM, WIND

9/9/1968 HAIL, WIND 5/10/1969 HAIL, WIND 7/6/1969 HAIL, LIGHTNING, WIND 8/8/1969 HAIL, LIGHTNING, WIND 8/9/1969 HAIL, LIGHTNING, WIND 4/29/1970 FLOODING, HAIL, WIND 6,250 0

Page 93: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

93

Figure 41. Hailstorm Events in Lexington-Fayette County 1960-2000 Date Description 7/15/1970 HAIL, LIGHTNING, WIND 3,571 0

7/15/1971 HAIL, SEVERE, STORM/THUNDER STORM, WIND

5/27/1973 HAIL, LIGHTNING, SEVERE, STORM/THUNDER STORM, WIND

6/19/1973 FLOODING, HAIL, WIND 3,571 0

6/27/1973

FLOODING, HAIL, LIGHTNING, SEVERE STORM/THUNDER STORM, WIND

4/1/1974 HAIL, WIND 4,167 0

7/7/1974 HAIL, SEVERE STORM/THUNDER STORM, WIND

8/21/1974 HAIL, SEVERE STORM/THUNDER STORM

8/29/1974

FLOODING, HAIL, LIGHTNING, SEVERE STORM/THUNDER STORM

7/16/1975 HAIL, LIGHTNING 7/17/1975 HAIL, WIND 9/5/1975 HAIL, WIND 7/6/1976 HAIL, LIGHTNING 3/20/1982 HAIL, WIND

5/21/1982

FLOODING, HAIL, LIGHTNING, SEVERE STORM/THUNDER STORM, WIND

5/18/1993 HAIL, WIND

Following a search for more specific information on hailstorm hazard events that have affected UK main campus facilities, one record was retrieved:

• June 7, 2007 – The Green House Complex was

damaged by hailstorm damaging plastic roofs #3417 & #3430 with a total damage cost of $7,450. (UK UPO Claim Log)

Non-Campus Facilities According to the Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan, the effects of hailstorms can include minimal to severe property damage and destruction. According to NOAA, 1,972 reported hailstorms have fallen in Kentucky since 1980 (493 in 2002 and 2003 alone). Only one person was reported to have been injured in these storms, and no one died due to the hail. Below is a listing of more significant hail events in Kentucky that have occurred since 1993: Figure 42. Significant Hail Events in Kentucky Since 1993

Date Location (County) Magnitude

Property Damage

Crop Damage

4/16/1998 Warren 2.75 in $510 M 0 5/1/2002 Pulaski 4.5 in $5 M $1 M 5/1/2002 Laurel 4.5 in $30 M $2 M 5/1/2002 Rockcastle 2.75 in $4.5 M $1 M 5/4/2003 McCracken 2.5 in $20 M 0

5/4/2003 Marshall 2.75 in $10 M 0 (Source: NCDC http://ncdc.noaa.gov)

Page 94: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

94

Following a search for more specific information on hailstorm hazard events that have affected UK main campus facilities, four records were found:

• March 1992 – The Calloway County extension office suffered damage to the roof of the building. Cost of damages is unknown. (Agricultural Extension Office)

• 2002 – The Washington County extension office suffered hail damage to the roof and some siding with a total cost of repair of $13,520.00. (Agricultural Extension Office)

• April 2002 – The McCracken County extension office suffered hail damage to the roof from a large wind and hail storm. The roof had to be replaced for a total cost of $17,000. (Agricultural Extension Office)

• May 2003 – The Ballard County extension office

suffered physical damage to the roof/shingles of the building with a total repair cost of $8,387.68. (Agricultural Extension Office)

Page 95: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

95

4.3.7 Karst/Sinkhole

Figure 43. SUMMARY OF KARST/SINKHOLE RISK FACTORS

Period of occurrence: At any time. Probability of event(s): Infrequent.

Warning time: Weeks to months, according to monitoring or maintenance.

Potential impact(s):

Economic losses such as decreased land values and Agro-business losses. May cause minimal to severe property damage and destruction. May cause geological movement, causing infrastructure damages.

Cause injury or death Injury and slight chance of death. Potential facility shutdown Days to weeks.

Potential impact(s):

Impacts human life, health, and public safety. Utility damage and outages, infrastructure damage (transportation and communication systems), structural damage, fire, damaged or destroyed critical facilities, and hazardous material releases. Can lead to economic losses such as unemployment, decreased land values, and Agro-business losses.

Cause injury or death Injury and risk of multiple deaths. Potential facility shutdown Weeks to months.

General Characteristics of the Soils Main Campus According to the LFUCG Hazard Mitigation Plan, Lexington-Fayette County is predominately underlain by Lexington Limestone Formation. Karst formation, or the rapid underground movement of water through eroded bedding planes and caves, also plays an important part in the thickness of the soil and has planning ramifications as well. Soils in the Inner Bluegrass Physiographic Region of Lexington-Fayette County generally range from deep and well drained to thin soil cover. The soils are high in natural fertility, have clay subsoil, and are formed in place from the weathered limestone lying underneath. Non-Campus Facilities According to the Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan, karst landscapes and aquifers form when water dissolves limestone, gypsum and other rocks. The surface expression of Karst includes sinkholes, sinking streams and springs. Kentucky contains one of the world’s largest karst-ridden topographies. About 38% of the state has sinkholes that are recognizable on topographic maps, and 25% has obvious and well-developed karst features. The following state map of Kentucky shows areas underlain by bedrock that have high, moderate, or limited potential for karst development.

Page 96: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

96

Historical Impact Main Campus According to the LFUCG Hazard Mitigation Plan, local karst hazards include: sinkhole flooding, sudden cover collapse, and leakage around dams. The most noticeable issues for the Lexington-Fayette County area surrounding UK’s main campus are sinkhole flooding and cover collapse. Karst topography and high land value have combined in the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Service Area to form one of the more expensive and difficult to resolve drainage problems. Sinkholes receive a large portion of runoff during rainfall events. The topography of this area directs many creeks and ditches into these sinkholes. The sinkholes are subject to surcharging during intense rainfall events, leaving the excess water nowhere to go. This excess water ponds in the area of the sinkholes and in some cases, floods residences. It is difficult to provide conveyance systems for the release of the excess water due to the topography. Therefore, the problems arising from sinkholes are complex, expensive and difficult to resolve. According to the Physical Plant Division at UK, the cave system located at UK’s main campus was and in some cases still is used for storm drainage. The storm drainage for some buildings was discharged to the cave system from area drains around the buildings and grounds. In the past when the cave system was overloaded and the ground water level raised to a point where the water table was above the drains, water would flow back from the cave system into the

buildings. Flooding from karst/sinkhole hazards have been experienced at the Business Economic Building and at Erikson Hall. The drainage around these two buildings have been reworked and removed from the cave system. The problem has not returned for these two buildings. Non-Campus Facilities According to the Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan, karst hazards include: sinkhole flooding, sudden cover collapse, leakage around dams, and collapse of lagoons resulting in waste spills and radon infiltration into homes. The most noticeable hazards are sinkhole flooding and cover collapse. Damage to infrastructure from these two causes is so common in Kentucky that it is typically dealt with by local authorities as a routine matter. Collapses are seldom reported to any central agency. In Kentucky, infrastructure damage from Karst has included Wolf Creek Dam on Lake Cumberland in southeastern Kentucky. Throughout the state, many other reservoirs of all sizes have leaking dams or leakage through carbonate bedrock around the dam. For example, leakage through caves passing under the dam of Shanty Hollow Lake in Warren County and leakage through bedrock forming the abutment bank of Spa Lake in Logan County are more recent examples of Karst damage. Although there has been considerable damage throughout the state from Karst/Sinkhole hazards, no information was found specific to UK non-campus facilities. For future plan updates, information on Karst

Page 97: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

97

locations in relation to non-campus facilities should be further explored. Figure 44. Karst Regions of Kentucky

(Source:www.esri.com/news/arcnews/winter0203articles/winter0203gifs/p31p11g.jpg)

Page 98: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

98

4.3.8 Landslide

Figure 45. SUMMARY OF LANDSLIDE RISK FACTORS

Period of occurrence:

At any time. Chance of occurrence increases after heavy rainfall, snowmelt, or construction activity.

Probability of event(s):

Infrequent. Probability increases at the base of steep slope, the base of drainage channel, and developed hillsides where leach-field septic systems are used.

Warning time:

Weeks to months, depends on inspection for weaknesses in rock and soil.

Potential impact(s):

Economic losses such as decreased land values, and agro-business losses. May cause minimal to severe property damage and destruction. May cause geological movement, causing infrastructure damages.

Cause injury or death Injury and slight chance of death Potential facility shutdown Days to weeks

Historical Impact Main Campus According to the LFUCG Hazard Mitigation Plan, the slope percentage for Lexington-Fayette County is within a region of Kentucky with a low risk of landslide. The follow map shows landslide susceptibility for UK’s main campus. Also, there are no known landslide occurrences in the County.

Following a search for more specific landslide hazard information relevant to UK’s main campus, there are no known records of damage caused as a result of landslide hazard events. Non-Campus Facilities According to the Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan, landslide problems are usually related to certain rock formations that yield soils that are unstable on moderate to steep slopes. Often, slopes are cut into or oversteeped to create additional level land for development. For example, a landslide that occurred on a connector road from Alexandria to Ashland in northern Kentucky cost the state millions of dollars to repair; and an effort to create several acres of level land for a shopping complex in Laurel County triggered a landslide that resulted in damage to a subdivision upslope from the complex and threatened a major highway below. Landslide problems can be compounded when unrecognized ancient slides are excavated during construction. Due to the high level of landslide events throughout the state of Kentucky, KyEM has spent $617,466.54 on acquisitions of landslide prone homes over the last three years. Although landslide hazard events are recorded for the state of Kentucky, there are no records or information to show landslide hazard events that have affected UK’s non-campus facilities.

Page 99: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

99

(Source: LFUCG Hazard Mitigation Plan)

Page 100: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

100

4.3.9 Mine Subsidence

Figure 46. SUMMARY OF MINE SUBSIDENCE RISK FACTORS

Period of occurrence: At any time.

Probability of event(s): Infrequent.

Warning time: Weeks to months, according to monitoring or maintenance.

Potential impact(s):

Economic losses such as decreased land values and agricultural-business losses. May cause geological movement, causing infrastructure damages.

Cause injury or death Injury and slight chance of death. Potential facility shutdown Days to weeks.

Main Campus According to the LFUCG Hazard Mitigation Plan, limestone is the chief geologic resource in Lexington-Fayette County. The Central Quarry, near downtown Lexington at 1280 Manchester Street, mines limestone for use in construction materials (concrete, asphalt). The mines originating from the Central Quarry extend under parts of Lexington. Although there has been no reported incidence of mine subsidence, the continued limestone quarrying within Lexington-Fayette County and the continued growth of the built environment create an ever increasing vulnerability to mine subsidence.

After a search for specific mine subsidence events and issues that may have affected UK’s main campus, there are no known records of damage as a result of mine subsidence. Non-Campus Facilities According to the Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan, mine subsidence, or land settlement, resulting from subsurface mineral extraction is a major geologic hazard in Kentucky, creating problems for 34 counties. Conflicts result between the surface development of urban and suburban area and the subsurface development of the mineral resources. While no dollar amount has yet been fixed on the annual loss to Kentucky resulting from ground subsidence serious damage to highways, public buildings, businesses, private homes, and water supplies have been documented. When buildings or structures are damaged as a result of mine subsidence, most insurance policies do not automatically cover the damage. In a study done for the Cabinet for Natural Resources and Environmental Protection, Division of Abandoned Mine Lands (AML), the Kentucky Geological Survey (KGS) documented hundreds of proven and probable causes of damage related to mine subsidence. The study covered Ohio, Union, Hopkins, Muhlenberg and McLean Counties in western Kentucky and Boyd County in eastern Kentucky. Following a search for specific mine subsidence events and issues that may have affected UK’s non-campus facilities, there are no records of damage as a result of

Page 101: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

101

mine subsidence. For future plan updates, non-campus facilities should be mapped in relation to mine locations in Kentucky.

Page 102: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

102

4.3.10 Severe Storm Figure 47. SUMMARY OF SEVERE STORMS RISK FACTORS

Period of occurrence: Spring, Summer and Fall.

Probability of event(s): Frequent.

Warning time: Minutes to hours.

Potential impact(s):

Utility damage and outages, infrastructure damage (transportation and communication systems), structural damage, fire, damaged or destroyed critical facilities, and hazardous material releases. Impacts human life, health, and public safety.

Cause injury or death Injury and risk of multiple deaths. Potential facility shutdown Days to weeks.

Historical Impact Main Campus According to the LFUCG Hazard Mitigation Plan, Lexington-Fayette County is susceptible to severe storms that can be a combination of intense rain, high winds, and lightning. Some of these severe storms have the potential to cause damage to property and crops, and can even result in injury or death.

Below is more detailed information on several severe storms that resulted in damage, injury, or death on UK’s main campus.

• May 27, 1917 – A storm did considerable damage on the main campus, especially to the trees. Patterson Hall, Education Building, Old Dormitory, Administration Building, Science Building, and the New Dormitory all suffered wind damage. (Minutes of the University of Kentucky Board of Trustees)

• June 16, 1934 – Many trees were destroyed on the main campus on the evening of June 16th, such damage being irreparable. President McVey filed a report and the total amount of damage caused was $2,466.73 (in 1934 dollars). The largest amount of damage was to the Administration Building, Barker Hall, Service Building, Mechanical Hall, Memorial Coliseum, and Bradley Hall. 199 trees were lost. (Minutes of the University of Kentucky Board of Trustees)

• March 13, 1986 – Storm destroys barn and damages other buildings on UK’s Maine Chance farm. About 35 trees were uprooted across the farm and parts of the stone wall on the farm’s Newtown Pike edge were destroyed by falling utility poles and trees. (Lexington Herald-Leader)

• July 18, 2005 – Lightning struck the gate at the Library Lot, damaging communication chips. Total damage was $1,363.20. (UPO Claim Log)

• August 29, 2005 – Lightning struck the automatic pay machines at Parking Structure #5. Total damage was $5,000. (UPO Claim Log)

• November 5, 2005 – The Medical Science Building suffered wind damage from a severe

Page 103: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

103

storm. Total damage was $9,624.08. (UPO Claim Log)

• November 15, 2005 – Wind from a severe storm damaged the entry sign on Limestone to Parking Structure #5. Total damage was $7,470. (UPO Claim Log)

• November 28, 2005 – High winds from a severe storm ripped off about 30 feet of flashing from Robotics #108. Total damage was $2,455.56. (UK UPO Claim Log)

• January 2, 2006 – Lightning struck the Simplex 4002 System at the Livestock Disease Diagnostic Center. Total damage was $1,697.61. (UK UPO Claim Log)

• May 26, 2006 – Lightning during a severe storm struck the storage room and burnt chips on the computer board at Parking Structure #5. Total damage was $16,708. (UK UPO Claim Log)

• June 1, 2006 – Heavy rain, hail and wind gust of up to 50 miles per hour pounded the northeast side of Lexington damaging trees, flooded streets and knocked out power. About 12,000 Kentucky Utilities customers were without power. (Lexington Herald-Leader)

• June 12, 2006 – A severe storm caused water damage to the Learning Center Room #101 at the College of Medicine. Total damage was $6,598.80. (UK UPO Claim Log)

• August 18, 2006 – Lightning struck the cameras and equipment at Parking Structure #5. Total damage was $600. (UK UPO Claim Log)

• September 13, 2006 – A severe storm caused water damage to the roof of the Medical Center, Research #1, Room 202. The roof had to be

replaced for a total damage cost of $4,197.53. (UK UPO Claim Log)

• September 22, 2006 – Water damage was caused due to heavy storms over the weekend damaging the Wethington Building, Safety & Security (UK Police Headquarters), Maxwelton Court, Alumni Gym, Alumni House, Erikson Hall, Funkhouser Building, Kastle Hall, Law Building, McVey Hall, Memorial Coliseum, Reynolds Warehouse, Scovell Hall, Thomas Hunt Morgan, and Pence Hall. Total damage cost was $29,322.09. (UK UPO Claim Log)

• March 1, 2007 – Lightning during a severe storm struck the automatic pay station on the third floor of Parking Structure #5. Total damage was $63,180. (UK UPO Claim Log)

• June 8, 2007 – Lightning during a severe storm struck Parking Structure #5 and damaged several gates and pieces of the visitors’ lot equipment. Total cost of damages was $19,333.12. (UK UPO Claim Log)

• June 27, 2007 – Lightning during a severe storm struck Parking Structure #5 and damaged the Port Controllers EG & Library Lots. Total cost of damages was $950. (UK UPO Claim Log)

• October 24, 2007 – Rain damage to roof and electronic equipment in the Forest Ecology Lab. (UK UPO Claim Log)

• January 10, 2008 – Lightning during a severe storm struck the Fiscal Affairs & Research Administration and damaged scientific equipment. Total cost of damages was $6,870.68. (UK UPO Claim Log)

• February 22, 2008 – Wind during a severe storm damaged the baseball field cover. Total

Page 104: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

104

cost of damages was $5,396. (UK UPO Claim Log)

Non-Campus Facilities

According to the Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan, there have been eleven Presidential Declarations due to severe storms and other storm-related events for the state of Kentucky. After a search of specific severe storm events records for UK’s non-campus facilities, seven have been recorded as having caused damage to the Non-Campus Facilities:

• September 1927 – In Quicksand, wind from a severe storm destroyed a barn on the Experiment Station Farm. It was reported to the Board of Trustees that the insurance had been adjusted with the company for $2,465.35 as payment for the loss involved. (Minutes of the UK Board of Trustees)

• March 1929 – In Quicksand, the president reported a fire at the Robinson Sub-Experiment Station. One of the small cottages was destroyed. President McVey also reported the damage by wind storm to a barn at Campbellsburg, located on one of the experiment farms. (Minutes of the UK Board of Trustees)

• March 23, 2006 – In Princeton, wind from a severe storm caused damage to a barn. Total damages were estimated at $50,800. (UK UPO Claim Log)

• August 14, 2006 – The roof of the West Kentucky Cabin #60 was damaged by wind from a severe storm. Total cost of damages estimated at $2,200. (UK UPO Claim Log)

• March 2007 – In Todd County, lightning from a severe storm came in on the telephone lines and damaged a router for the computer network; 3 telephones and the answering machine. Total estimate for damages was $1,000. (Agricultural Extension Offices)

• October 22, 2007 – In Versailles, lightning from severe storm damaged parts and equipment at UK Animal Research Sheep Unit. Total estimate for damages was $7,554.85. (UK UPO Claim Log)

Page 105: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

105

4.3.11 Severe Winter Storm

Figure 48. SUMMARY OF SEVERE WINTER STORMS RISK FACTORS

Period of occurrence: Winter. Probability of event(s): Likely.

Warning time: Days for snow Minutes to hours for ice.

Potential impact(s):

Utility damage and outages, infrastructure damage (transportation and communication systems), structural damage, and damaged or destroyed critical facilities can cause severe transportation problems and make travel extremely dangerous. Power outages, which results in loss of electrical power and potentially loss of heat, and human life. Extreme cold temperatures may lead to frozen water mains and pipes, damaged car engines, and prolonged exposure to cold resulting in frostbite.

Cause injury or death Injury and slight risk of death. Significant threat to the elderly.

Potential facility shutdown Days.

Historical Impact Main Campus According to the LFUCG Hazard Mitigation Plan, Lexington-Fayette County experiences regular winter weather, which often includes extreme cold and winter precipitation. The campus and County location makes it vulnerable to heavy snowfall. Its regional proximity to the Gulf of Mexico provides a necessary moisture source, yet it is far enough north to be influenced by polar air masses. Low-pressure systems that bring heavy snow to the area usually track eastward across the southern U.S. before turning toward the northeast. Frequently, these systems move up the east coast and have little effect on Lexington-Fayette County. Sometimes, however, storms turn and move along the western margin of the Appalachian Mountains. With cold air in place over Kentucky and the region, these storms bring moisture from the Gulf of Mexico and can dump heavy snow as they move through County, affecting UK’s main campus. Below are some notable winter storm hazard events that have affected UK’s main campus and its surrounding area of Lexington-Fayette County: • February 13, 1994 – Ice storm left 2,000 people in

Lexington without power. (Lexington Herald-Leader)

• January 8, 1996 - The notorious “Blizzard of 96’” brought a significant amount of snowfall to the

Page 106: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

106

Lexington-Fayette County region where UK is located. It was reported that 7 to 15 inches of snow (with drifts up to three feet) accumulated as a result of the storm. Road conditions remained hazardous in some locations for many days and a presidential disaster was declared. Snow removal costs for the county totaled $306,342. (LFUCG Hazard Mitigation Plan)

• February 3-6, 1998 - A major snowstorm affected UK’s main campus and the Lexington-Fayette County region. Most of the heavy snow was confined to an area around Lexington where anywhere from 12 to 30 inches of snow had accumulated over the entire period. Because of the extremely wet nature of the snow, damage from this storm was extensive. Power outages were widespread as falling trees brought down power lines and poles. No presidential disaster was declared and the reported response and recovery costs of the storm for the County totaled approximately $300,000. (LFUCG Hazard Mitigation Plan)

• February 19, 2003 - Freezing rain and low temperatures fell upon UK’s main campus and Lexington-Fayette County. The hardest hit area was in and around Lexington, where up to 1.25 inches of ice accumulation was observed on trees and power lines. Many of these trees and power lines were downed triggering power outages, blocking roads (some of which were forced to be closed) and causing severe damage to homes and automobiles. The FEMA Estimates for damage to UK’s main campus totaled $784,187. (Risk Management- FEMA Estimates)

• January 26-27, 2009 – A 36-hour barrage of ice, snow and freezing rain snapped power lines across Kentucky, leaving at least 525,000 electric customers out of power. The storm produced the second-worst power outage in Kentucky history. In Lexington, patches of the city were without power all day, leaving at least 36,500 homes and businesses without light and heat. Below is a listing of cost estimates received from UKEM following the ice storm:

o Total Estimated Cost for Facilities Management (snow/ice removal, debris cleanup, agronomy greenhouse, generators): $333,958.88. (UKEM)

o Winter Storm Fayette County Estimated Cost: $49,349.39. (UKEM)

o Woodford County Damages: $10,091.50. (UKEM)

o Eden Shale Damages: $7,834.00. (UKEM) o Total Cost Estimate for Western Kentucky

Substation, Princeton, Kentucky: $145,039.00 (UKEM)

Non-Campus Facilities According to the Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan, Kentucky’s location makes it vulnerable to heavy snowfall. Its proximity to the Gulf of Mexico provides a necessary moisture source, yet it is far enough north to be influenced by polar air masses. Low-pressure systems that bring heavy snow to Kentucky usually track eastward across the southern U.S. before turning toward

Page 107: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

107

the northeast. Frequently, these systems move up the east coast and have little effect on Kentucky. Sometimes, however, storms turn and move along the western margin of the Appalachian Mountains. With cold air in place over Kentucky, these storms bring moisture from the Gulf of Mexico and can dump heavy snow as they plow through the Commonwealth. After a search of specific severe winter storm hazard events, the below list was created from records of damage to UK’s non-campus facilities: • December 2007 – In Daviess County, the extension

office suffered damage from a severe winter storm. The ice and snow from the storm damaged the roof of the extension office. The cost of damage is unknown to UK Agricultural Extension Offices. (Agricultural Extension Office)

The winter storm events that are listed for the main campus section may also have caused damage UK’s non-campus facilities.

Page 108: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

108

4.3.12 Tornado

Figure 49. SUMMARY OF TORNADO RISK FACTORS

Period of occurrence:

Year-round, primarily during March through August.

Probability of event(s): Infrequent.

Warning time:

Minutes to hours. Over 80 % of all tornadoes strike between noon and midnight.

Potential impact(s):

Utility damage and outages, infrastructure damage (transportation and communication systems), structural damage, and damaged or destroyed critical facilities. Impacts human life, health, and public safety.

Cause injury or

death Injury and risk of multiple deaths. Potential facilities

shutdown 30 days or more. Historical Impact Main Campus According to the LFUCG Hazard Mitigation Plan, Lexington-Fayette County is located in the most severe

wind zone (ZONE IV 250 mph) (see map) in the country. This signifies that the entire metropolitan area is highly vulnerable to tornado weather. Figure 50. Wind Zones in the United States

(Source: http://ncdc.noaa.gov) Since 1956, 8 tornadoes have touched down causing $5.6 million in property damage and 26 injuries in Lexington-Fayette County. Of these eight tornadoes two were categorized as F0, four as F1 class, and one in both the F2 and F3 categories. Upon review of the most detailed information for historic hazardous events, no damage was recorded to the main

Page 109: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

109

campus as a result of the above 8 tornado events. Since UK is located within Lexington-Fayette County and considered a Zone IV wind zone, tornados are hazardous to UK’s main campus and should be further examined for future plan updates. Non-Campus Facilities According to the Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan, tornadoes are somewhat common throughout Kentucky and have occurred in every month of the year. The occurrence of a tornado in Kentucky is predictable in that it is a proven fact that tornadoes touchdown in Kentucky at some point during every year (661 tornadoes have been reported in Kentucky since 1950, and average of about 12 per year, according to NOAA). Conversely, the occurrence of a tornado is highly unpredictable in it is impossible to forecast the exact time and location that it will touch down and the path that it will take. Tornadoes have caused $707.7 million in property damage, $186,000 in crop damage, 115 deaths, and 2,593 injuries in Kentucky. Of the 661 tornadoes, three were categorized in the F5 class, 37 in the F4 class, and 82 in the F3 class. The rest were in the first three (F0-F2) categories. Kentucky is located in the most severe wind zone (ZONE IV 250 mph) in the country. This signifies that most of the state is highly vulnerable to tornado weather.

Following a search of specific tornado hazard events that have cause damage to UK non-campus facilities, three events were recorded: • April 23, 1968 – At least 150 tobacco barns in the

area were destroyed in the April 23 tornado that killed four persons and devastated a fourth of the county seat town of Falmouth. (Minutes of the UK Board of Trustees)

• 1991 – In Simpson County, a portion of a roof was blown off of the extension facility due to strong winds of the tornado. The facility suffered roof and structural damage. The cost to the university is unknown. (Agricultural Extension Offices)

• February 2008 – In Hardin County, an F2 tornado

moved directly over the extension office, storage building, and parking lot. Damage to the extension office storage building and trees totaled $1,495.38. (Agricultural Extension Offices)

Page 110: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

110

4.3.13 Wildfire

Figure 51. SUMMARY OF WILDFIRE RISK FACTORS

Period of occurrence: Year-Round, primarily Summer.

Probability of event(s): Chances of occurrence increase with drought or earthquake.

Warning time:

None. Humans, through negligence, accident, or intentional arson, have caused approximately 90% of all wildfires in the last decade.

Potential impact(s):

Utility damage and outages, infrastructure damage (transportation and communication systems), structural damage, fire, damaged or destroyed critical facilities, and hazardous material releases.

Cause injury or death Injury and risk of death. Potential facilities shutdown 30 days or more.

Historic Impact Main Campus According to the LFUCG Hazard Mitigation Plan, Lexington-Fayette County lies within a region of Kentucky with a low and very low risk to wildfire. The following map shows the risk class of UK’s main campus:

After a search of specific wildfire hazard incidences, no records were collected that showed wildfire damage to UK’s main campus. Non-Campus Facilities According to the Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan, over half of Kentucky’s land area is forested. Another 22% of the land is cropland while 18% is pasture land. Forest fires are a major threat to Kentucky’s forests. The average number of wildland fires in Kentucky each year is 1,447. Arson is the number one cause of wildland fires in Kentucky and 99% of all wildfires are caused by humans. After a search for detailed wildfire hazard information, there are no records of wildfire occurrences that have damaged non-campus facilities. For future plan updates, information on the total acreage of forest and agricultural land will be helpful to determining UKs vulnerability to wildfires.

Page 111: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

111

4.4 Analyzing Development Trends Population Trends The enrollment population at UK grew by 3,171 students from the 1999-2000 school year to the 2008-2009 school year. Enrollment reached its height during the 2006-2007 school year and since has decreased slightly by 296 in the 2008-2009 school year. Figure 52 to the right demonstrates the change in enrollment at UK from 1999-2009. The dark grey represents the student population (Undergraduate, Graduate, and First Professional), and the light grey represents UG Auditors, Postdoctoral, and House Staff. Figure 53 to the right demonstrates the trend in full-time faculty from 1998-2008. Full-time faculty has increased by over 200 in the ten year time period.

Figure 52. UK Enrollment Count from 1999-2009

Figure 53. Number of Full-time Faculty by Year

Page 112: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

112

Past Development Trends The current UK main campus on South Limestone Street became home to the university in 1882. The land was a city park and state fair grounds given by the city to UK. Prior to that, the institution had land in two locations near Lexington, one of which is now the location of Transylvania University. Current and Future Development Trends According to the UK Physical Development Campus Plan 2050, UK is unique among American Universities as a land-grant institution that is home to a medical center and college of agriculture in addition to having a full complement of sciences, humanities, arts and professional studies, all on one single campus. Figure 54.UK Proposed and Existing Buildings in 2002

The UK Physical Development Campus Plan was created to achieve a set of ambitious goals mandated by the State of Kentucky a top 20 public research institution while accommodating a projected increase in the student population. Figure 54 below shows existing and proposed buildings as of 2002 when the Physical Development Plan was completed. UK has several facilities either currently under construction or in planning and design. Figure 55 shows a complete list of facilities that are in construction/renovation or in planning and design. Among the largest in scope is a Patient Care Facility with a scope of $700,000,000 and the Biological Pharmaceutical Complex Building with a scope of $135,292,000.

Page 113: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

113

Figure 55. New and Renovated Facilities

(Source: UK Fact Booklet 2008-2009) In the future as development occurs at UK, the UK Hazard Mitigation Plan will be consulted to address potential hazard vulnerability issues to proposed areas of new development.

Page 114: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

114

4.5 Hazard Probability A key component in completing a Risk Assessment is identifying the probability of future hazard occurrences. This proved to be a difficult process for the UKHMP due to the lack of past occurrences over the period of time reviewed (1862-2009). Although UK shows some hazard history a true probability calculation cannot be assumed from this amount of occurrence data. However, the Profile section does describe a pattern of hazard events occurring at UK facilities across the state. A detailed view of the occurrence data along with a loosely calculated probability figure is provided. Hazard Occurrences Probability Extreme Heat 4 0.02% Flood 7 0.03% Hail 5 0.02% Severe Storm 36 0.17% Tornado 3 0.01% Winter Storm 3 0.01% These events occurred across 43 different facilities, thus creating a specific probability to any specific area even more difficult to execute.

Page 115: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

115

4.6 Assessing Vulnerability Research shows there is no single way to determine Hazard Vulnerability. Uncertainties are inherent in any loss estimation methodology, arising in part from incomplete scientific knowledge concerning natural hazards and their effects on the built environment. Uncertainties also result from approximations and simplifications that are necessary for a comprehensive analysis (such as incomplete inventories, demographics, or economic parameters). It is important to note that each variable for the Vulnerability assessment had some missing data for at least one building. CHR spent numerous hours researching and conducting test runs to determine the best methodology for the UKHMP. The final model was selected because it relies heavily on Geographic Information System (GIS) software and provides the reader several layers of information that can be used individually for their own planning needs. The Vulnerability Assessment for the UKHMP was created with one main objective: assess the vulnerabilities of the main campus and non-campus assets. In order to complete this task CHR decided to investigate the models created in the University of Louisville’s Hazard Mitigation Plan, Lexington Fayette Hazard Mitigation Plan and the State Hazard Mitigation Plan. These three models provided the pieces that facilitated the UKHMP vulnerability assessment model. It was quickly discovered that the main campus assets were not directly influenced by any spatially defined hazard. So the University of Louisville’s Asset

Vulnerability model was employed for this vulnerability assessment. This model will be discussed in more detail in the Main Campus Vulnerability section. The Non-Campus Vulnerability section includes other obstacles. Non-Campus Vulnerability The first obstacle for this vulnerability assessment was the geographic extent that UK’s assets offer. UK owns assets in every county in the state. It was decided very early on that the vulnerability assessment would attempt to complete an assessment on every asset that UK owns across the state (Main and Non-Campus). After several iterations and tedious review of the data UK identified 1132 assets across the state. This list was very comprehensive including buildings, extension offices, barns, bus shelters, content only, and farms to name a few. With such a large dataset and with the vast geographic area that these assets covered it was determined to use the vulnerability data from the Kentucky Enhanced State Hazard Mitigation Plan in order to understand the vulnerability of every asset. The state vulnerability data was conducted at the census tract level and provided the baseline for understanding what each asset was vulnerable to. In order to understand the complexity and thoroughness of the State Hazard Mitigation Vulnerability Assessment Model we have added the complete definition of this classification model.

Page 116: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

116

Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Vulnerability Assessment Methodology Model Hazard Vulnerability Score = Exposure Score X Hazard Score When measuring vulnerability, CHR first measured what would be exposed to each natural hazard. For our model the exposure score was made up of six different variables called ranks. Exposure Score Exposure Score = Population Rank + Property Value Rank + Critical Facilities Rank + Social Vulnerability Rank + Hazardous Materials Rank + Transportation Rank Definition of Variables

1. Population Rank – 2004 census tract population estimates taken from Census.

2. Property Rank – Data was derived from the 2000

Census on the following variables: median value, median age, and unit count.

3. Critical Facilities Rank – Census tract count on

several different critical facilities. This data was derived from Kentucky Division of Geographic Information (DGI) and HAZUS MH.

a. Hospitals, schools, emergency operation centers, communication facilities, electric

power facilities, natural gas facilities, fire stations, police stations, potable water facilities, and waste water treatment facilities.

4. Social Vulnerability Rank – Census tract data

derived from the 2000 Census data on the following indicators:

a. Population living with poverty, total number of families with a female head of household, total number of manufactured homes, population receiving disability assistance, population that is considered linguistically isolated, population that does not own a vehicle, population that is over the age of 65, and population receiving public assistance.

5. Transportation Rank – Census tract count on

several different transportation facilities. This data was derived from DGI and HAZUS-MH.

a. Airports, bus stations, highway bridges, highway tunnels, railroad stations, and ports.

6. Hazardous Material Rank – Census tract count of

hazardous materials within each census tract. This data was derived from HAZUS-MH.

The Exposure Score places human variables into the Hazard Vulnerability Score. Each variable (see list above) was calculated and then ranked 1-5 (1=low, 5=high), using the Natural Breaks (Jenks) method

Page 117: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

117

provided in ArcGIS as a classification choice. Next, the ranks were added to produce an Exposure Score, one of the variables used to equate the Hazard Vulnerability Score for the State Hazard Mitigation Vulnerability Assessment Methodology. In order to fully understand each hazards risk to each hazard CHR derived a Hazard Score. The Hazard Score establishes each census tracts Risk to each one of the hazards based on several factors. Hazard Score Hazard Score = Area Effected Rank or Occurrence Rank Definition of each Variable:

1. Area Effected Rank – Percent of the census tracts total area that is affected by the Hazard. The area affected boundary files were acquired from different data sources discussed in the Hazard Vulnerability sections.

2. Occurrence Rank – Census tract count on

past Hazard occurrences. There were two methods to this model for the 2007 plan. One, the total numbers of occurrences for a hazard event across a county was obtained from SHELDUS data. Since the SHELDUS data comes with the county being designated a hazard score was built at the county level. The county hazard score was

then overlaid onto the census tracts and each census tract was assigned their own hazard score based upon what county they were in. Second, CHR was able to retrieve geocoded occurrence data on Tornados and Wildfires. This data was used as a simple overlay onto the census tracts and the total number was accounted for each census tract.

The Hazard Score assigns a hazard variable to the Hazard Vulnerability Score. The Hazard Score varies with each hazard due to the fact that some hazards have area boundaries for analysis, like flooding, while numbers of occurrences are best for those hazards occurring anytime or anyplace, like tornadoes and severe storms. Each variable (Occurrence Rank and Area Affected Rank) was calculated and then ranked 1-5 (1=Low, 5=high), using the Natural Breaks (Jenks) method provided in ArcGIS as a classification choice. Once the Exposure Score and the Hazard Score were determined, the equation was set into motion to produce a Hazards Vulnerability Score for each census tract. The Hazard Vulnerability Scores contain some bias toward the more populated counties in the state. This is due to a correlation between more populated areas and their tendency to have higher numbers of critical facilities, properties, transportation facilities, etc. This resulted in higher populated counties having greater exposure. However, with the data provided, other equations can be developed with or without one or more variables, or a different weighting system. The goal of this model was to

Page 118: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

118

assess the most vulnerable areas throughout the state. Being that the most populated areas have the most at risk, this model achieved that goal. Non-Campus Vulnerability cont. In order to complete the non-campus vulnerability assessment each one of the 1132 assets had to be geo-located. This was accomplished through a GIS process labeled as geocoding. Geocoding uses the addresses of the data provided and geographically locates the address data on a map. This process typically has about a 60-70% success rate, varying on the address data. CHR was able to provide a 100% geocode match for this data. The state vulnerability model assesses vulnerability by census tract. The census tract level data provides a micro level of analysis. Completing a vulnerability assessment requires the model to develop planning areas that show vulnerability in a specific area. Using the census tracts provides 994 vulnerability planning areas. These areas were used for UKs non-campus vulnerability assessment model. Once the UK data was geocoded and the state vulnerability score data was retrieved the vulnerability assessment process was set into motion. This model was used to identify each asset's vulnerability based upon what census tract that the asset was within. Using the state vulnerability GIS data provided the vulnerability base line, while adding the non-campus geocoded GIS file into the mapping session provided

CHR the ability to determine a hazard vulnerability score for every asset owned by UK, including Main Campus facilties. The following maps will display each hazards vulnerability score along with the geocoded non-campus locations across the state. Each map will also display an insert map with the main campus represented. These insert maps display the vulnerabilities of the main campus assets. These maps also display the spatially defined hazards when data is available. The spatially defined hazard data was added to showcase the hazard locations near the main campus. This will illustrate the fact that the main campus is not affected by any spatially defined hazard besides Karst. An asset hazard vulnerability table (Appendix 10) consisting of all 1132 main and non-campus assets has been created to display and identify each assets vulnerability to each hazard. This table allows the reader to specifically identify each individual asset and that assets vulnerability to each of the following hazards. 1. Dam Failure 2. Drought 3. Earthquake 4. Extreme Heat –Extreme heat did not have a vulnerability assessment completed due to lack of substantial data for extreme heat occurrences and or any other vulnerability mapping technique data. 5. Flood 6. Hail 7. Karst/Sinkhole

Page 119: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

119

8. Landslide 9. Mine Subsidence 10. Tornado 11. Severe Storm 12. Wildfire 13. Winter Storm The maps and table will display a number called a Hazard Vulnerability Score, which was calculated using the State Hazard Mitigation Vulnerability Assessment Model 9see above). These scores were calculated either 0-5 or 1-5. Each census tract was giving a score of 0-5 (0 = N/A (no data); 1 = low vulnerability; 5 = high vulnerability).

Page 120: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

120

4.6.1 Dam Vulnerability Map

Page 121: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

121

A Dam Failure Vulnerability Score was determined by first counting and categorizing dams within each census tract as high, medium, and low hazard dams. A high hazard dam was given a score of 3, medium a score of 2, and low a score of 1. Second, scores for high, medium, and low hazard dams were added together producing a total dam score for each census tract. Next, census tracts were ranked 1-5 (1=low, 5=high) based upon their total dam score producing a Hazard Score. Finally, a Dam Failure Vulnerability Score was calculated for each census tract by multiplying a census tract’s Exposure Score by its Hazard Score and ranked 1-5 (1=low, 5=high). An asset hazard vulnerability table (Appendix 10) consisting of all 1132 main and non-campus assets has been created to display and identify each assets vulnerability to each hazard. This table allows the reader to specifically identify each individual asset and that assets vulnerability to each one of the Hazards identified in the plan.

Page 122: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

122

4.6.2 Drought Vulnerability Map

Page 123: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

123

The Drought Vulnerability Score was determined by taking the average of the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) over the last 32 years for the four Palmer Drought Severity Index climate zones for the state of Kentucky. These four zones averages were then ranked 1-4 (1=low, 4=high) producing a Hazard Score for those areas. Next these Hazard Score areas were overlaid onto the census tracts and each census tract was assigned their proper Hazard Score. Finally, a Drought Vulnerability Score was calculated for each census tract by multiplying the Exposure Score by the Hazard Score and ranked 1-5 (1=low, 5=high). An asset hazard vulnerability table (Appendix 10) consisting of all 1132 main and non-campus assets has been created to display and identify each assets vulnerability to each hazard. This table allows the reader to specifically identify each individual asset and that assets vulnerability to each one of the Hazards identified in the plan.

Page 124: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

124

4.6.3 Earthquake Vulnerability Map

Page 125: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

125

Earthquakes can occur anytime, anywhere with little or no warning. Past severe storms occurrences cannot predict future occurrences or damage. However they can show trends of risk from the past. The Earthquake Vulnerability Score was determined by first totaling the number of past occurrences from 1817 to 1995 for each county and then overlaid on the census tracts. Next, counties were ranked 1-5 (1=low, 5=high) based upon the number of occurrences in each county producing an Occurrence Rank. The second step involved overlaying a county map with a Peak Ground Acceleration map and scoring each county, 1-5, based upon which PGA area they were located in producing the Area Affected Rank. A Hazard Score was produced by adding the Occurrence Rank with the Area Affected Rank. Finally, an Earthquake Vulnerability Score was calculated for each county by multiplying the Exposure Score with the Hazard Score and ranked 1-5 (1=low, 5=high). An asset hazard vulnerability table (Appendix 10) consisting of all 1132 main and non-campus assets has been created to display and identify each assets vulnerability to each hazard. This table allows the reader to specifically identify each individual asset and that assets vulnerability to each one of the Hazards identified in the plan.

Page 126: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

126

4.6.4 Flood Vulnerability Map

Page 127: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

127

Once it is known that a census tract contains a floodplain it must be determined how vulnerable that county is to flooding. First, by using floodplain boundary data from the FEMA Q3 and the new Digital Federal Insurance Rate Maps (DFIRMs) data set which is the digital floodplain boundary used for the GIS process, each census tract’s percent of area within the floodplain was determined. Next, the census tracts were ranked 0-5 (0=N/A, 1=low, 5=high) based upon the percentage of the floodplain located within each census tract producing a Hazard Score. Finally, a Flood Vulnerability Score was calculated for each census tract by multiplying the Exposure Score by the Hazard Score and ranked 0-5 (0=N/A, 1=low, 5=high). An asset hazard vulnerability table (Appendix 10) consisting of all 1132 main and non-campus assets has been created to display and identify each assets vulnerability to each hazard. This table allows the reader to specifically identify each individual asset and that assets vulnerability to each one of the Hazards identified in the plan.

Page 128: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

128

4.6.5 Hail Vulnerability Map

Page 129: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

129

Hail can occur anytime, anywhere with little or no warning. Past severe storms occurrences cannot predict future occurrences or damage. However they can show trends of risk from the past. The Hail Vulnerability Score was determined by first totaling the number of past occurrences from 1960-2006 for each county using SHELDUS data sets. Next, the county data was overlaid onto the census tract file and each census tract was assigned their Hazard Score derived from what county they are within. Each census tracts were ranked 1-5 (1=low, 5=high) based upon the number of occurrences in each census tract producing a Hazard Score. Finally, a Hail Vulnerability Score was calculated for each county by multiplying the Exposure Score by the Hazard Score and ranked 1-5 (1=low, 5=high). An asset hazard vulnerability table (Appendix 10) consisting of all 1132 main and non-campus assets has been created to display and identify each assets vulnerability to each hazard. This table allows the reader to specifically identify each individual asset and that assets vulnerability to each one of the Hazards identified in the plan. .

Page 130: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

130

4.6.6 Karst/Sinkhole Vulnerability Map

Page 131: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

131

Karst topography is an indicator of sinkhole vulnerability. To determine each census tract’s vulnerability to sinkholes the in-lay map from the Kentucky Geological Survey showing Kentucky Karst Major areas was overlaid with the state census tract map. GIS was used to process each census tract’s percent of the total area within the karst area. Next, the census tract were ranked 0-5 (0=N/A, 1=low, 5=high) based upon the percentage of the karst located within each census tract producing a Hazard Score. Finally, a karst Vulnerability Score was calculated for each census tract by multiplying the Exposure Score by the Hazard Score and ranked 0-5 (0=N/A, 1=low, 5=high). An asset hazard vulnerability table (Appendix 10) consisting of all 1132 main and non-campus assets has been created to display and identify each assets vulnerability to each hazard. This table allows the reader to specifically identify each individual asset and that assets vulnerability to each one of the Hazards identified in the plan.

Page 132: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

132

4.6.7 Landslide Vulnerability Map

Page 133: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

133

Landslide vulnerability was determined by first overlaying the census tract with a landslide overview map from the USGS. This determined what percentage of each census tract was covered by risk of landslide. Each census tract’s risk of landslide was defined based on the USGS methodology as explained in the U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1183. Incidences Low = Low Landslide Incidence (less than 1.5% of the area is involved in a landslide) Moderate = Moderate Landslide Incidence (1.5-15% of the area is involved we chose the Mean = 6.0) High = High Landslide Incidence (greater than 15% of the area is involved in landslides) Susceptibility Combo – Hi – areas with a high susceptibility to landslides but moderate incidences was graded at 15% SUS- High - High susceptibility and low incidences as graded a 15% SUS – Mod – Moderate susceptibility and low incidences was graded 6% If a census tract area was covered by two or more attributes the values were summed. (For example a census tract is covered by 2 susceptibility polygons – Sus High covers 10 percent of the area, and SUS MOD covers .3 percent of the county the county is assigned a hazard value of (10*15%) + (.3*6%) =1.518 the value 1.518 represents the percentage of area of the county that is susceptible to land sliding.)

The total percent of each census tract susceptible to landslide was calculated and then ranked 1-5 (1=low, 5=high) producing a Hazard Score. Finally, a Landslide Vulnerability Score was calculated for each census tract by multiplying the Exposure Score by the Hazard Score and ranked 1-5 (1=low, 5=high). An asset hazard vulnerability table (Appendix 10) consisting of all 1132 main and non-campus assets has been created to display and identify each assets vulnerability to each hazard. This table allows the reader to specifically identify each individual asset and that assets vulnerability to each one of the Hazards identified in the plan. .

Page 134: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

134

4.6.8 Mine Vulnerability Map

Page 135: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

135

A Mine Subsidence Vulnerability Score was determined by overlaying mined out areas GIS data with census tract map of the state. GIS was used to process each census tract’s percent of the total area within the mined out areas. Next, the census tract were ranked 0-5 (0=N/A, 1=low, 5=high) based upon the percentage of the mined out areas located within each census tract producing a Hazard Score. Finally, a Mine Subsidence Vulnerability Score was calculated for each census tract by multiplying the Exposure Score by the Hazard Score and ranked 0-5 (0=N/A, 1=low, 5=high). An asset hazard vulnerability table (Appendix 10) consisting of all 1132 main and non-campus assets has been created to display and identify each assets vulnerability to each hazard. This table allows the reader to specifically identify each individual asset and that assets vulnerability to each one of the Hazards identified in the plan.

Page 136: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

136

4.6.9 Severe Storm Vulnerability Map

Page 137: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

137

Severe Storms can occur anytime, anywhere with little or no warning. Past severe storms occurrences cannot predict future occurrences or damage. However they can show trends of risk from the past. The Severe Storm Vulnerability Score was determined by first totaling the number of past occurrences from 1960-2006 for each county using SHELDUS data sets. Next, the county data was overlaid onto the census tract file and each census tract was assigned their Hazard Score derived from what county they are within. Each census tracts were ranked 1-5 (1=low, 5=high) based upon the number of occurrences in each census tract producing a Hazard Score. Finally, a Severe Storm Vulnerability Score was calculated for each county by multiplying the Exposure Score by the Hazard Score and ranked 1-5 (1=low, 5=high). An asset hazard vulnerability table (Appendix 10) consisting of all 1132 main and non-campus assets has been created to display and identify each assets vulnerability to each hazard. This table allows the reader to specifically identify each individual asset and that assets vulnerability to each one of the Hazards identified in the plan.

Page 138: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

138

4.6.10 Tornado Vulnerability Map

Page 139: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

139

Tornadoes can occur anytime, anywhere with little or no warning. Past tornado occurrences cannot predict future occurrences or damage. However they can show trends of risk from the past. The Tornado Vulnerability Score was determined by identifying location points of where past tornados have occurred using a GIS data file from NOAA. The tornado points were overlaid onto the census tracts and each census tracts tornado occurrences were identified. Next, counties were ranked 1-5 (1=low, 5=high) based upon the number of occurrences in each census tract (See Appendix 30) producing a Hazard Score. Finally, a Tornado Vulnerability Score was calculated for each census tract by multiplying the Exposure Score by the Hazard Score and ranked 1-5 (1=low, 5=high). An asset hazard vulnerability table (Appendix 10) consisting of all 1132 main and non-campus assets has been created to display and identify each assets vulnerability to each hazard. This table allows the reader to specifically identify each individual asset and that assets vulnerability to each one of the Hazards identified in the plan.

Page 140: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

140

4.6.11 Wildfire Vulnerability Map

Page 141: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

141

The Wildfire Vulnerability Score was determined by identifying location points of where past Wildfire have occurred from 1997-2007 using a GIS data file from the Kentucky Division of Forestry. The wildfire points were overlaid onto the census tracts and each census tracts wildfire occurrences were identified. Next, counties were ranked 0-5 (0=N/A, 1=low, 5=high) based upon the number of occurrences in each census tract (See Appendix 32) producing a Hazard Score. Finally, a Wildfire Vulnerability Score was calculated for each census tract by multiplying the Exposure Score by the Hazard Score and ranked 0-5 (0=N/A, 1=low, 5=high). An asset hazard vulnerability table (Appendix 10) consisting of all 1132 main and non-campus assets has been created to display and identify each assets vulnerability to each hazard. This table allows the reader to specifically identify each individual asset and that assets vulnerability to each one of the Hazards identified in the plan.

Page 142: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

142

4.6.12 Winter Storm Vulnerability Map

Page 143: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

143

Severe Winter Storms can occur anytime, anywhere with little or no warning. Past severe storms occurrences cannot predict future occurrences or damage. However they can show trends of risk from the past. The Severe Winter Storm Vulnerability Score was determined by first totaling the number of past occurrences from 1960-2006 for each county using SHELDUS data sets. Next, the county data was overlaid onto the census tract file and each census tract was assigned their Hazard Score derived from what county they are within. Each census tracts were ranked 1-5 (1=low, 5=high) based upon the number of occurrences in each census tract producing a Hazard Score. Finally, a Severe Winter Storm Vulnerability Score was calculated for each county by multiplying the Exposure Score by the Hazard Score and ranked 1-5 (1=low, 5=high). An asset hazard vulnerability table (Appendix 10) consisting of all 1132 main and non-campus assets has been created to display and identify each assets vulnerability to each hazard. This table allows the reader to specifically identify each individual asset and that assets vulnerability to each one of the Hazards identified in the plan.

Page 144: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

144

Main Campus Vulnerability In order to assess the vulnerability of the main campus assets it was determined to use a vulnerability model based on the research done in the University of Louisville Hazard Mitigation Plan. The basis of this model is to address the overall vulnerability of each asset regardless of hazard. The University plans are done at a more detailed level and determining vulnerability for each identified hazard was difficult for a campus that is not affected by spatially defined hazards. This also made it difficult to determine losses. The staff at CHR has completed several vulnerability models however this model proved to provide a unique challenge. First, this model is dealing with a University and with that comes a micro level analysis. For this model CHR chose to analysis each building for their risk and vulnerability. Second, CHR was dealing with a campus that was not directly at risk from any known spatially defined hazards and had very little occurrence data for each asset. So, CHR chose to look at each buildings relative risk and vulnerabilities regardless of the hazard. CHR had created an asset inventory list for each asset in the UK system. From this data a base map was created with several layers of information attributed for each building on the main campus. This data came from a variety of resources (Capital Project Management, Campus Physical Plant Department, UK Emergency Management, Risk Management).

The base map GIS file was provided to CHR from the University of Kentucky Physical Plant Department. This data included campus boundary, campus roads, and the building polygons. These files served as the base map in ArcGIS and were joined to several tabular files containing several layers of information including: building value, research value, total values, GSF, acquisition date, age, classroom and class Lab sqft., classroom and lab workstations, total research sqft., CPE and VFA Building conditions, staff occupation, housing capacity, critical facility, and building types. As mentioned before CHR was dealing with a different kind of vulnerability model. Unlike traditional vulnerability assessment variables (population and infrastructure), a University presents a new challenge in that one of our main assets is our research. In developing a vulnerability assessment for a University, CHR developed a 3 pronged approach addressing the vulnerability assessment variables.

1. Population 2. Infrastructure 3. Research assets

The base map gave CHR the base variables to begin the main campus vulnerability assessment. With the 3 pronged approach in mind several vulnerability assessment variables were chosen. The following are the vulnerability variables for the UKHMP Main Campus Vulnerability Assessment Model:

Page 145: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

145

CHR identifies these as the Elements at Risk Ranks (ERR). Accounting for what is at risk in each facility. Facility Age Facility age was collected from the University of Kentucky’s Capital Project Management Department. The tabular age data was joined to the spatial data for the Main Campus assets. Following the join, the facility age was categorized into undefined (zero or no available data) and five ranges determined by Jenks Natural Breaks. The buildings were then ranked 1 through 5 (1 = low, 5 = high) based on age and represented on the UK Facility Age Map. This data should be used to determine which building is more vulnerable based on the age of the building and regardless of the hazard. This model is stating that a building is more vulnerable (5) the older the building is. This is just one way to look at vulnerability in the main campus vulnerability model. Facility Population The estimate for facility population was determined from the synthesis of multiple data sources. Population for facilities categorized as housing was derived from the number of staff occupants (provided by Plant Assets/General Accounting) in addition to housing capacity (provided by UK Auxiliary Services). For facilities that were categorized as education population was determined by the number of classroom workstations (provided by UK Emergency Management) and staff occupants. For the remaining facilities staff occupants were used if the data was available. The tabular age data was joined to the spatial data for UK campus facilities. Following the join, the facility

population was categorized into undefined (zero or no available data) and five ranges determined by Jenks Natural Breaks. The buildings were then ranked 1 through 5 (1 = low, 5 = high) based on population and represented on the UK Facility Population Estimate Map. This data should be used to determine which building is more vulnerable based on the estimated population of the building and regardless of the hazard. This model is stating that a building is more vulnerable (5) the more population the building contains. This is just one way to look at vulnerability in the main campus vulnerability model. Facility Research value The data for the research value contained in each facility was obtained from the Risk Management Department. To arrive at research value CHR determined to count each assets/facilities contents value as research values. This allowed CHR to capture not only medical research but also books and computers that could be considered research values as well. The tabular research value data was joined to the spatial data fin the base map layer. Following the join, the facility research value was categorized into five ranges determined by Jenks Natural Breaks. The buildings were then ranked 1 through 5 (1 = low, 5 = high) based on population and represented on the UK Facility Research Value Map. This data should be used to determine which building is more vulnerable based on the research value in each of the buildings and regardless of the hazard. This model is stating that a building is more vulnerable (5) the more research value the building contains. This is just one way to look at vulnerability in the main campus vulnerability model.

Page 146: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

146

Critical Facility Critical Facility information was obtained at the April 18, 2008 planning meeting. The tabular critical facility data was joined to the spatial data for UK Facilty Critical. Following the join, the critical facility data was categorized based on if it was or was not a critical facility and ranked as either a 0 or 3 (0 = none, 3 = high Facility Replacement Cost The initial facility replacement cost was obtained from Capital Project Management at UK. The data supplied was from 2007 therefore it was adjusted to 2009 by a 10% increase. In addition the UK hospital was adjusted higher by $230 million to account for building improvements. The tabular age data was then joined to the spatial data for UK campus facilities. Following the join, the facility replacement cost was categorized into undefined (zero or no available data) and five ranges determined by Jenks Natural Breaks. The buildings were then ranked 1 through 5 (1 = low, 5 = high) based on replacement cost and represented on the UK Facility Replacement Cost Map. When measuring main campus vulnerability, CHR measured what would be exposed to a natural hazard event. For our model this will be described as Elements at Risk Rank (ERR). The ERR was created to portray the exposure element of any vulnerability model. The elements at risk variables for the main campus are mapped and an Asset Hazard Vulnerability chart is attached as Appendix 10 showing each buildings ranking in a tabular format.

Page 147: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

147

4.6.13 Facility Age Vulnerability

See Appendix 11 Facility Age Elements at Risk Rank Table

Page 148: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

148

4.6.14 Facility Population Estimate Vulnerability

See Appendix 12 Facility Population Estimate Elements at Risk Rank Table

Page 149: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

149

4.6.15 Facility Research Value Vulnerability

See Appendix 13 Facility Research Value Elements at Risk Rank Table

Page 150: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

150

4.6.16 Facility Critical Facilities Vulnerability

See Appendix 14 Facility Critical Facilities Elements at Risk Rank Table

Page 151: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

151

4.6.17 Facility Replacement Cost Vulnerability

See Appendix 15 Facility Replacement Cost Elements at Risk Rank Table

Page 152: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

152

4.7 Assessing Vulnerability: Loss Estimation

The final step of the risk assessment determines loss estimates. The purpose of this step is to describe how institutional assets will be affected by a specific hazard scenario or event. The UKHMP risk assessment process showed the university is not directly threatened by any hazard boundary natural hazard and we have very little past loss data to work with. The university’s low risk to any known hazard zones and the low occurrence data eliminated a more defined loss estimation scenario. A well-defined loss estimation scenario is similar to what has been completed for the Lexington Fayette Hazard Mitigation Plan or the State Hazard Mitigation Plan, in which an overlay of known hazard boundaries are placed over assets, providing an identification of assets directly affected by a specific hazard scenario. FEMA’s software program HAZUS-MH assists with a similar process for estimating potential losses. In the traditional loss estimation process, three types of potential losses are considered: life, property (structure and contents), and function. While UK did not have the traditional loss estimation scenarios to evaluate the vulnerability variables can be used to show which buildings have the largest populations, highest replacement costs, and the buildings that are critical to the university’s function regardless of the event. While this is not a true loss estimation scenario it does provide a form of loss potential analysis.

Page 153: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

MITIGATION STRATEGY

Page 154: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

154

5 Mitigation Strategy After assessing risks to UK, the third phase of the mitigation planning process is to develop a mitigation strategy. The below mitigation strategy section provides an outline of the identification, analysis, and implementation of mitigation goals and actions. 5.1 Local Hazard Mitigation Goals Requirement §201.6(c)(3)(i): [The hazard mitigation strategy shall include a] description of mitigation goals to reduce or avoid long-term vulnerabilities to the identified hazards. The first step to developing the mitigation strategy was to identify well-focused goals based on the results of the risk assessment and on what the UK community would like to achieve. The mitigation goals were designed to be general guidelines for the mitigation plan. These goals are both short and long-term and represent the overall vision of the mitigation plan. UK recognizes that the goals might not necessarily be achievable, but the plan consists of actions designed to move the community towards the goals.

The Steering Committee developed six goals for the UKHMP: Goal 1: Protect lives and reduce injuries that could be

caused by natural hazards. Goal 2: Protect University property and research data

from damage that could be caused by natural hazards.

Goal 3: Enhance existing, or develop new University

policies and technical capabilities that will reduce damaging effects of natural hazards.

Goal 4: Continue to build and strengthen partnerships

and synergies among university agencies, state and local governments, the campus community and the general public to promote effective mitigation strategies in a comprehensive and collaborative effort.

Goal 5: Increase campus community understanding of

natural hazard mitigation through the promotion of mitigation education and awareness of natural hazards.

Goal 6: Integrate risk reduction strategies into university

plans, policies, standards and practices.

Page 155: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

155

5.2 Identification and Analysis of Mitigation Actions

Requirement §201.6(c)(3)(ii): [The mitigation strategy shall include a] section that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects being considered to reduce the effects of each hazard, with particular emphasis on new and existing buildings and infrastructure. In addition to creating the above mitigation goals, the Steering Committee identified and analyzed a range of specific mitigation actions and projects that would reduce the effects of each hazard. This section identifies, evaluates, and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions being considered to reduce the effects of each hazard identified in the risk assessment, with emphasis on new and/or existing buildings and infrastructure. To better facilitate the identification and analysis of mitigation actions, the Steering Committee utilized several handouts and action forms. First, the action forms were distributed via email to solicit feedback on existing and future hazard mitigation projects that are taking place at UK. To supplement the actions identified from the completed action forms, the Steering Committee was given an opportunity to identify mitigation actions at the third Steering Committee meeting on November 19, 2008. At this meeting, Steering Committee members received a handout containing sample mitigation actions from other university and local jurisdictions, and another handout containing descriptions of mitigation action categories

(See Appendix 16 for a sample completed mitigation action form and handouts.) Additionally, UK has already begun to add action items to the mitigation strategy matrix in response to recent natural hazard events. Following the January 2009 winter storm, UKEM and affected UK agencies met to identify actions to add to the UKHMP. This meeting demonstrates UK’s continual commitment to improving its ability to mitigate the damages from natural hazards. The Steering Committee identified and analyzed 35 mitigation actions. The analysis of each action is included in the Mitigation Strategy Matrix in Section 5.3. The mitigation actions addressed the 13 natural hazards that were identified in the risk assessment. The below list provides the frequency that a natural hazard is addressed by the 35 mitigation actions. Dam Failure: 22 Tornado: 24 Drought: 22 Winter Storm: 23 Earthquake: 24 Wildfire: 23 Extreme Heat: 22 Flood: 30 Hailstorm: 22 Karst/Sinkhole: 22 Landslide: 22 Mine Subsidence: 22 Severe Storm: 26

Page 156: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

156

5.3 Implementation of Mitigation Actions Requirement: §201.6(c)(3)(iii): [The mitigation strategy section shall include] an action plan describing how the actions identified in section (c)(3)(ii) will be prioritized, implemented, and administered by the local jurisdiction. Prioritization shall include a special emphasis on the extent to which benefits are maximized according to a cost benefit review of the proposed projects and their associated costs. 5.3.1 Prioritization of Mitigation Actions After identifying the mitigation actions, the Steering Committee prioritized each action and developed a cost-benefit review to compare the expected benefits of the action to the likely costs of the action. Mitigation Action Prioritization The Mitigation Strategy Matrix defines the rankings (A-D) that were assigned to each mitigation action. The following prioritization table provides explanation of the ranking system:

Figure 56. Mitigation Action Prioritization Matrix Priority Description Very High A Projects or activities that permanently

eliminate damages or deaths and injuries across the university from any hazard.

High B Project or activities that reduce the probability of damages, deaths, and injuries across the university from any hazard.

Medium C Project or activities that educate the public on the subjects of hazard mitigation, hazard research, and disaster preparedness.

Low D Project or activities that warn the public to the approach of a natural hazard threat across the university.

Page 157: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

157

Implementation of Mitigation Actions Specifically, the Mitigation Strategy Matrix was comprised by incorporating the following elements: 1. Determining mitigation actions for each of the

previously identified hazards; 2. Reviewing whether new or existing buildings would

be affected; 3. Prioritizing each action; 4. Identifying how each action would be implemented

and administered; 5. Matching each action to a goal; 6. Considering benefits versus costs; 5.3.2 Cost-Benefit Review The cost-benefit review is a broad and comprehensive analysis to compare the monetary and non-monetary costs and benefits associated with each action. The most important question of the benefit-cost review is: Does the project make sense for the overall community? The cost-benefit review for UK was performed on a qualitative basis. This review considered each activity’s benefit as a function of its ability to permanently eliminate or reduce risk (i.e. Very High, High, Medium, and Low). The prioritization table was used as a determinant of the benefits that would be experienced as a result of implementing the action. The higher the action’s priority, the more cost beneficial the action was determined to be for the community. The costs to implement each activity were also examined

qualitatively using a similar convention. The result produced a generalized approach for assessing relative benefits to cost. The following page contains the Benefit-Cost Matrix that was utilized to determine a ranking for each action project. The Steering Committee agreed that more detailed benefit cost analysis would be performed as necessary prior to the implementation of each activity. In cases of activities identified for funding through FEMA mitigation programs, the group recognized that FEMA approved benefit-cost analysis would be required. The Steering Committee used a cost-benefit scoring system of: Very High, High, Medium, and Low.

Page 158: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

158

Figure 57. Hazard Mitigation Cost-Benefit Matrix

Mitigation Prioritization

D (Low) C (Medium) B (High) A (Very High)

Very High Medium High Very High Very High

High Medium High High Very High

Cost Medium Medium Medium High High

Low Low Medium Medium Medium

Page 159: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

159

Figure 58. Mitigation Strategy Matrix

Source Prio

rity

Hazard Type of Action or Project

Lead Department/Contact Person

Proposed Schedule

Funding/Budget Considerations

Matches Goals

Activity Reduces Affects on New or Existing Structures Benefit/Cost

1 Meeting 11.19.08 A Wild Fire

Conduct fuel break restoration (4-H camps) Agriculture On-going Internal 1,2,6 Existing High

2 Meeting 11.19.08 A Flood

Work to connect 4-H camps to city sewer (London and Dawson Springs) Agriculture 3-5 years Unidentified 1,2,4,6 Existing Very High

3 Meeting 11.19.08 A Flood

Construct retention and channel modification projects (Alumni Drive) Facilities Management One-time Grants/Internal 1,2,3 New and Existing Very High

4 Meeting 11.19.08 A Flood

Construct underground retention for Press Avenue watershed Facilities Management One-time Grants/Internal 1,2,3 New and Existing Very High

5 Meeting 11.19.08 A Flood

Create a bypass for main campus near Newtown Pike Facilities Management One-time Grants/Internal 1,2,3 New and Existing Very High

6 Action Report Form B

Tornado Severe Storm Earthquake

Identify or construct safe rooms in buildings with insufficient shelter areas

Housing, Division of Student Affairs, OEM, Facilities Management, UKPD, Provost One-time Unidentified 1,3,6 New and Existing Very High

7 Action Report Form B All Hazards Evacuation support kits

Housing Division of Student Affairs Office of Emergency Management UKPD One-time Unidentified 1,3 New and Existing High

8 Meeting 11.19.08 B Flood

Complete Stormwater credit project Facilities Management On-going

Funded by tax credit 1,2,3 Existing High

9 Meeting 11.19.08 B

Severe Storm

Install Lightning Protection for campus buildings Facilities Management On-going Unidentified 1,2,3 Existing High

10 Meeting 11.19.08 B

Severe Storm

Build storm shelters for extension facilities (4-H camps) Agriculture On-going Grants 1,6 New and Existing Very High

Page 160: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

160

Figure 58. Mitigation Strategy Matrix

Source Prio

rity

Hazard Type of Action or Project

Lead Department/Contact Person

Proposed Schedule

Funding/Budget Considerations

Matches Goals

Activity Reduces Affects on New or Existing Structures Benefit/Cost

11 Action Report Form B All Hazards

Establish procedures and guidance from Student Affairs Cabinet to manage hazardous events that might affect students and campus community

Student Affairs, UKPD, UKEM Ongoing Internal 1,2,3,4,5,6 Existing Medium

12

After Action meeting from the 2009 Ice Storm B All Hazards

Re-do utility lines at ALL 4-H camps throughout the state so that they are underground Agriculture Ongoing Unidentified 1,2,3 New and Existing High

13

After Action meeting from the 2009 Ice Storm B All Hazards

Install Generators at ALL 4-H Camps and other Agriculture research facilities across the state Agriculture One-time Unidentified 1,2,3 New and Existing High

14

After Action meeting from the 2009 Ice Storm B All Hazards

Schedule yearly visit by trained arborist to ALL 4-H Camps and other Agriculture facilities in order to assess trees and provide suggestions for regular branch trimming and tree removal Agriculture Ongoing Unidentified 1,2,3 New and Existing High

15 Meeting 11.19.08 C

Severe Storm Tornado Winter Storm Earthquake

Update and maintain Severe Storm Shelter website and insure green shelter signs are posted in appropriate areas in all buildings on campus. Various Departments On-going Internal 1,4,5,6 Existing Medium

Page 161: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

161

Figure 58. Mitigation Strategy Matrix

Source Prio

rity

Hazard Type of Action or Project

Lead Department/Contact Person

Proposed Schedule

Funding/Budget Considerations

Matches Goals

Activity Reduces Affects on New or Existing Structures Benefit/Cost

16 Meeting 11.19.08 C All Hazards

Complete development of Building Emergency Action Plans for all university buildings. These plans will include evacuation plans and shelter and safe room procedures. OEM, Institution-wide 2 years Departmental 1,2,3,4,5,6 New and Existing Medium

17 Action Report Form C All Hazards

Place "permanent" emergency instructions in all University-owned housing, classroom buildings, assembly areas, laboratories, healthcare facilities and common rooms on campus.

OEM, UK Police, UK Fire Marshall, Real Estate Services, Housing, Provost Office One-time Unidentified 1,2,5 New and Existing Medium

18 Meeting 11.19.08 C Flood

Develop Best Management Practices (BMP) for Stormwater Management Facilities Management 1 year Internal 1,2,3,4,5,6 Existing Medium

19 Meeting 11.19.08 C All Hazards

Create and enforce University Design and Construction Standards for new development

Facilities Management (PPD, Capital Improvements) On-going Internal 1,2,3,6 New and Existing Medium

20 Meeting 11.19.08 C All Hazards

Research the possibility for a new centralized back-up generator Facilities Management Unidentified 1,2,3 Existing Medium

21 Meeting 11.19.08 C All Hazards

Review alternative sources for main power (secondary mains) Facilities Management On-going Internal 1,2,3 Existing High

22 Meeting 11.19.08 C All Hazards

Create training and informational videos for students and faculty Public Relations On-going Grant 1,2,3,4,5,6 Existing Medium

23 Meeting 11.19.08 C All Hazards

Develop a website and marketing materials for hazard mitigation. UKEM 1 year Internal 3,4,5 Existing Medium

Page 162: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

162

Figure 58. Mitigation Strategy Matrix

Source Prio

rity

Hazard Type of Action or Project

Lead Department/Contact Person

Proposed Schedule

Funding/Budget Considerations

Matches Goals

Activity Reduces Affects on New or Existing Structures Benefit/Cost

24 Meeting 11.19.08 C All Hazards

Explore natural resource protection strategies for Robinson Forest Agriculture On-going Unidentified 2,3,6 Existing Medium

25 Meeting 11.19.08 C Flood

Develop an Emergency Flood Protection Management system for UK’s Good Samaritan Hospital Facilities Management On-going Unidentified 1,2,3,4,5,6 Existing Medium

26 Meeting 11.19.08 C All Hazards

Develop a Campus CERT Program. OEM Ongoing Internal 1,2,3,4,5,6 Existing Medium

27 Meeting 11.19.08 C All Hazards

Assign a member of UK steering committee to other hazard work groups like the State and LFUCG Hazard committee's OEM On-going None 4 Existing Medium

28 Meeting 11.19.08 C All Hazards

Identify and encourage the incorporation of available hazard mitigation education and outreach programs/products into school education programs. Various Departments 1-2 years Unidentified 1,2,3,4,5,6 New and Existing Medium

29 Meeting 11.19.08 C All Hazards

Assess the structural condition of all buildings owned by the University Facilities Management 3-5 years Unidentified 3 New and Existing High

30 Meeting 11.19.08 C Flood

Conduct a storm management study - Review Sanitary sewer system

Facilities Management, EHS One-time Internal 3,6 New and Existing High

31 Meeting 11.19.08 C All Hazards

Annual review of University Hazard Plan and risk assessment data OEM On-going Internal 3 New and Existing Medium

32 Action Report Form C All Hazards

Defining and designating communication links and roles Institution-wide One-time Internal 1,2,3,4,5,6 Existing Medium

Page 163: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

163

Figure 58. Mitigation Strategy Matrix

Source Prio

rity

Hazard Type of Action or Project

Lead Department/Contact Person

Proposed Schedule

Funding/Budget Considerations

Matches Goals

Activity Reduces Affects on New or Existing Structures Benefit/Cost

33 Action Report Form D All Hazards

Train Campus Recreation staff and resident advisors (RA's) to respond to campus emergency hazards.

Campus Recreation, Residence Life Ongoing

Campus Recreation Department 1,2,4,5,6 Existing Medium

34 Action Report Form D All Hazards

Identify and procure additional warning communication systems (digital media boards, network pop-ups, voice-over IP, etc.).

Housing Division of Student Affairs OEM, IT UKPD One-time Unidentified 1,2,3,4,5,6 New and Existing Medium

35 Meeting 11.19.08 D All Hazards

Build more awareness of UK Alert - Emergency education and awareness

OEM, Public Relations, Student Affairs, Student Government Association, Provost Office On-going Internal 1,2,3,4,5,6 Existing Medium

Page 164: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

164

6

PLAN MAINTENANCE

Page 165: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

165

UK Plan Maintenance The Plan Maintenance Procedures describe the method and schedule of monitoring, evaluating, and updating the Mitigation Plan within a five-year cycle. When updated, the plan will be reviewed and revised, if appropriate, and resubmitted to the State Hazard Mitigation Officer for initial review and coordination or within five years of the plan or the plan’s update approval by FEMA Region IV. As appropriate, the plan also will be evaluated after a disaster, or after unexpected changes in land use or demographics in or near hazard areas. The Hazard Mitigation Steering Committee also will be kept apprised of any changes in federal regulations, programs and policies, such as a change in the allocation of HMGP or PDM dollars. These evaluations will be addressed in the annual progress report for the plan and may affect the Action Plan.

6.1 Monitoring, Evaluating, and Updating the Plan

Monitoring UKEM, in partnership with other University departments will monitor the status and progress of the plan elements on an annual basis. The current Steering Committee will continue to meet on an annual basis. UKEM will be the primary point of contact for County, State, and Federal Officials and will coordinate all local efforts to monitor, evaluate, and update the plan. The Steering Committee will monitor the status and progress of the plan elements on an annual basis. The

Steering Committee will issue a summary report of this status at the end of each calendar year beginning with the first full calendar year of the plan (CY 2010) (See Appendix 17 for sample Annual Summary Report form). UK Office of Emergency Management will be the primary point of contact for county, state, and federal officials and will coordinate all University efforts to monitor, evaluate, and update the plan. For local purposes, an annual progress report for UKHMP will be developed. The progress report will be the vehicle used to monitor, implement, and evaluate the plan, and may lead to plan updates. These reports will be designed to allow responsible agencies and organizations the ability to list issues and successes for implementing the mitigation actions. Annually, the Steering Committee will evaluate and update their actions and develop status reports on progress. The annual progress report will be widely distributed to participating units, and to all disaster-related agencies, including the governing body and the public via public notices and public outreach. NOTE: These annual progress reports also can be submitted to the state, if requested. In order to accurately and efficiently monitor mitigation actions individual project progress reports (See Appendix 18 for Progress Report Form) will be filed with UKEM and the Steering Committee on a quarterly basis. These reports are designed to allow responsible agencies and organizations the ability to list issues and successes with implementing the mitigation actions they are responsible for in the mitigation action plan.

Page 166: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

166

Evaluating UKEM will evaluate the status and progress of the plan elements on a quarterly basis. The Steering Committee will evaluate the status and progress of the plan elements on an annual basis. UKEM will issue a quarterly evaluation report of the status of mitigation actions, objectives and goals, beginning with the first full calendar year of the plan (CY 2010). Continued stakeholder evaluation of the plan and achievement of goals and objectives will be provided annually through a survey of stakeholders that will seek information about the agency or organization’s activities with respect to hazard mitigation. Public comment on the plan and achievement of goals and objectives will also be solicited annually Updating As part of a more comprehensive effort to improve data quality and update data as it becomes available (i.e. infrastructure data, property valuation data, hazard data, and a wide variety of GIS-related efforts that will improve the accuracy and soundness of the plan), the Steering Committee will meet annually to review, amend and update the plan. UKEM will issue an evaluation report of the mitigation strategy quarterly. Emergency meetings will be called into session if needed. UKEM, using these annual meetings, will ensure submission of the new and updated plan within the 5 year cycle to the State and FEMA. Because hazard, building and project data is ever-changing the steering committee will develop a

standard form and procedure for developing and implementing amendments to the plan (See Appendix 19 for Amendment Form). Priority for mitigation will be given to the post-hazard event timeframe; immediately following a natural disaster when current listed mitigation goals, objectives and actions do not fully mitigate the new event. A steering committee emergency meeting may be called to ensure opportunities are advanced. In addition, the steering committee’s ability to update the mitigation process by adding new data into the mitigation plan will allow for the efficient use of available resources, staff, and programs. This plan maintenance process includes, but is not limited to, the proposal and passage (by majority vote) of updates and amendments by the steering committee during a regular annual or emergency meeting. The steering committee must document the process and information used in submitting the amendment, as well as the responsible agency and timeframe (if applicable). Any changes in the hazard mitigation plan will be documented and appended in a section titled “Amendments.” 6.2 Incorporation into Existing Planning

Mechanisms The University of Kentucky hazard mitigation program activities listed below demonstrate the ongoing efforts to mitigate the effects of natural and to some degree, man-made hazards. To ensure utilizing best practices and efficient resource management the mitigation strategy outlined in this plan can be incorporated as the

Page 167: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

167

ongoing programs are monitored, updated and evaluated. As a result, a comprehensive mitigation strategy will better prepare UK for all hazards. Community Emergency Response Team (CERT): The University is considering the development of a training program to help staff and students become first responders in the University. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) program consists of 20 hours of training that includes sessions on disaster preparedness, disaster medical operations, light search and rescue, terrorism, disaster fire suppression, and disaster psychology and team organization. The training ends with a disaster simulation where team members get to practice the skills they’ve learned in the course. Emergency Operations Center (EOC): The primary EOC is currently located in the UK Office of Emergency Management at 520 Oldham Court. The Lexington Fayette-Urban County Government EOC at 166 N. Martin Luther King Boulevard would be utilized for large scale incidents that impact not only campus but the city of Lexington as well. Emergency Operations Plan (EOP): The EOP is the backbone of operations during a disaster. The EOP provides a standard operations plan for the entire University. The EOP is updated annually. Disaster In-Services-Training: The University conducts both training and exercises to assist management and staff in planning for disasters and other emergencies. Tornado and Shelter-in-Place training are the most widely requested topics for in-

services. This program also conducts training to local schools and community groups. LFUCG Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC): UK is an active participant in the LFUCG LEPC and submits its required reports on an annual basis. UK also participates in training and exercises conducted by the LEPC. Bluegrass Emergency Response Team: UK supports the Bluegrass Emergency Response Team (BERT) by responding to emergencies as requested by BERT and participating in training, and exercises to chemical and radiological emergencies or other related events. UKEHS also has a Hazardous Materials Emergency Response Team to respond to chemical emergencies within the University. Metropolitan Medical Response System (MMRS): The Metropolitan Medical Response System is an ongoing effort by the public health and safety community in Fayette County to plan for serious health and medical catastrophes that threaten public health (terrorism, epidemics, etc.), to develop systems for coordinating and providing critical care where it is needed, and to purchase medicine and equipment. UK is a participant in the LFUCG MMRS. National Disaster Medical System (NDMS): The National Disaster Medical System is designed to care for the victims of an incident, like 9-11, that exceeds the medical care capability of an affected state, region or federal medical care system. NDMS plans for treating large numbers of casualties in a major peacetime disaster or national security emergency

Page 168: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

168

involving a conventional military conflict. Both of UK’s hospitals are participants in the NDMS program in Fayette County. Terrorism & Weapons of Mass Destruction: UK emergency response staff has received training for any event that might disrupt normal daily activities, such as terrorism or the use of a weapon of mass destruction. UKEM, EHS and UKPD attend regularly scheduled training sessions and response is incorporated into the Emergency Operations Plan. Tornado Weather Spotter Program: The National Weather Service sponsors The Weather Spotter program. UKEM and UKPD are trained as Weather Spotters. These trained people are the local eyes for the National Weather Service and help the NWS warn the public of possible severe weather. Warning Systems: LFUCG manages and coordinates the outdoor warning system which consists of Siren and Voice warning sirens in various areas within Fayette County. These devices are activated from the 24 hour warning point at local government radio. The system is tested monthly with weekly diagnostic tests performed silently. Standard operating procedures for siren operation are developed and reviewed annually. Other warning systems located at the 24 hour warning point include Emergency Alert System (EAS) and the Cable Interrupt system. Other warning systems that are monitored include the NOAA weather radio and several computer generated weather programs to keep a watchful eye on possible weather conditions

that would affect Fayette County. The University collaborates and partners with LFUCG and the National Weather Service in all of these warning programs. StormReady Campus: UK was officially recognized as a StormReady Campus by The National Weather Service (NWS) in October 2003. The certification means that UK has successfully met the criteria outlined by the NWS in its nationwide program to enhance community preparedness for severe storms and weather emergencies. Severe weather safe areas were identified in every building on campus. Special weather radios were installed in the most populated buildings and all residence halls. In addition, a website was created, showing severe weather shelter locations for each floor in campus buildings. The site will be updated in 2009 to reflect new construction, renovations and newly purchased buildings. UK’s StormReady status is valid for a three-year period with renewal being received in 2006. The university will apply for renewal of the NWS designation in 2009. The Action Plan projects address reducing the effects of hazards on new buildings and infrastructure as well as existing buildings and infrastructure. Projects also incorporate mitigation activities into other planning mechanisms and recommend mitigation projects that can be integrated into job descriptions, comprehensive plans, capital improvement plans, zoning and building codes, site plans, permitting, and other planning tools, where appropriate. UK will incorporate the action plan as applicable with other plans as they are developed via directives or through legislative process.

Page 169: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

169

6.3 Continued Public Involvement The UK Hazard Mitigation Steering Committee is dedicated to continuing public involvement in the plan and the mitigation actions that will be implemented. This plan has been created with input from faculty, staff and students and the main goal is to provide opportunities on a regular basis to facilitate continued public involvement. Public involvement requirements shall be met in the update of this mitigation plan. Public meetings will be held annually in order to solicit public participation in the evaluation of the plan, its goals, objectives, actions and update processes beginning with the first full calendar year of the plan (CY 2010). These meetings will be advertised by UKEM. To maintain continued public involvement, the Mitigation Plan, and the annual progress report will be maintained on several websites. The locations to review the annual progress report will be publicized and comment will be requested from the University community. Comments will be kept for review by the Committee and, if appropriate, incorporated into plan updates. The plan also will be kept in the local library’s system and at partnering agencies.

Page 170: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

170

REFERENCES

Page 171: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

171

7 References National Sites: FEMA http://www.fema.gov FEMA - Mitigation Division http://www.fema.gov/fima/ FEMA – Planning Resource Center http://www.fema.gov/fima/planresource.shtm National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration http://www.noaa.gov State Sites: Geology of Kentucky http://www.uky.edu/KGS/coal/webgeoky/kygeolgy.htm Kentucky Emergency Management Mitigation http://kyem.dma.state.ky.us/mitigation/mitigation_home.htm Kentucky Emergency Operations Plan http://kyem.dma.state.ky.us/KY%20EOP/tableof contents.htm Area Development Districts http://www.bgadd.org/index1.html Kentucky Division of Emergency Management http://kyem.ky.gov/assistance/mitigation.htm

Local Sites: Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government http://www.lfucg.com The Division of Environmental and Emergency Management (DEEM) http://www.lfucg.com/DEEM Economic Geology of Fayette County http://www.uky.edu/KGS/coal/webgeoky/county/fayetteecon.html The Center for Hazards Research and Policy Development http://hazardcenter.louisville.edu University Sites: Kentucky Climate Center at Western Kentucky University http://kyclim.wku.edu/ UK Agricultural Weather Center http://wwwagwx.ca.uky.edu/stormready/ UK College of Agriculture http://ce2.ca.uky.edu/ces UK Environmental Health & Safety http://ehs.uky.edu/welcome.html UK Fire Marshal http://ehs.uky.edu/fire/

Page 172: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

172

UK Office of Emergency Management http://www.uky.edu/EM UK Office of the Provost http://www.uky.edu/Provost/academicprograms.html UK Police Department http://www.uky.edu/Police UK University Archives and Records Program http://www.uky.edu/Libraries/libpage.php?lweb_id=298&lib_id=13 Reports/Studies

Board of Trustees Online Archive Chronology of the University of Kentucky University of Kentucky Fact Booklet 2008-

2009

Plans and Manuals Enhanced Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan Facility Condition Assessment & Space Study Project Kentucky State Hazard Mitigation Plan Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government Hazard Mitigation Plan Top 20 Business Plan University of Kentucky UK Physical Development Campus Plan 2050 UK Strategic Plan 2003-2006

Technical Information Kentucky Climate Center

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) – National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)

Page 173: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

APPENDICES

Page 174: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

174

8 Appendices Appendix 1: Adoption Legislation Governing Regualtions

Page 175: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

175

Page 176: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

176

Page 177: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

177

Page 178: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

178

Page 179: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

179

Page 180: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

180

Page 181: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

181

Page 182: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

182

Page 183: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

183

Page 184: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

184

Board of Trustee Agenda

Page 185: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

185

Board of Trustee Minutes

Page 186: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

186

Page 187: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

187

Adoption Resolution

Page 188: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

188

Page 189: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

189

Page 190: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

190

Appendix 2: Invitation – Steering Committee Meeting 1

YOU ARE INVITED TO ATTEND

Steering Committee Meeting November 2, 2007

University of Kentucky HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING EFFORT

The University of Kentucky’s Office of Emergency Management (UKOEM) will host a steering

committee meeting to kick off UK’s hazard mitigation planning process. This process is required under federal law to help universities better prepare for natural disaster events.

The meeting will be held in

The Lexmark Room, Main Building 9:00 a.m. to noon on Friday, November 2, 2007

Presentations and handouts will be provided to attendees to explain the planning process and how you can get involved. UKOEM is partnering with the University of Louisville’s Center for Hazards Research and Policy Development (CHR) to develop the university plan and has convened a Steering Committee of over 30 university and local government representatives to oversee the development of the plan. At the meeting, state, local and university representatives will provide more detail regarding mitigation planning requirements, local mapping efforts to support natural hazard planning, next steps, and opportunities for the university community to be involved in the process. Pursuant to the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000, as a university, UK is required to develop a comprehensive All Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan. To help us be better prepared for a university wide natural disaster, it is important that our community develop a strategy to mitigate losses. The plan will outline areas at-risk in the university community and determine vulnerabilities. The objective is to develop a program of activities to mitigate the university’s vulnerability to natural hazards that UK will adopt. If you are not able to attend please send a representative from your area. For More Information Contact: Christy Giles, Director, UK OEM – 859-257-3815 Therese Smith, Emergency Management Specialist, UK OEM – 859-257-6655 Andrea Pompei, University of Louisville, CHR - 502-852-2927 See attachment for an overview of the project:

Page 191: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

191

Appendix 3: Steering Committee Meeting Attendance Office First Last 11.02.07 04.18.08 11.19.08 03.13.09

Agriculture Linus Walton x x

Athletics Russ Pear sent rep x

Auxiliary Services Sarah Nikirk x x

x

AVP for Campus Services Anthany Beatty x

x

Campus Physical Plant Division Jack Applegate x

Campus Physical Plant Division John Zachem x x x

Campus Physical Plant Division-GIS David Kasier x x x

Campus Physical Plant Division-GIS Michelle Ellington x x

Capital Project Management Dall Clark

Capital Project Management Joe Crouch x x x x

College of Ag - Extension Paul Warner x

College of Ag - Farms Bill Peterson x x

College of Medicine * Ann Thomas

x

College of Medicine Lana Spicer

x

Communications Daryoush Marefat x x x x

Dean of Students Tony Blanton x

Environmental Health and Safety David Hibbard x x x x

EVP for Facilities Bob Wiseman

Good Samaritan Hospital Garey Hunt

Hazard Mitigation Grants Program Brian Gathy

x

Hazard Mitigation Grants Program Emily Frank x x x x

Housing Brenda Stamper

Human Resources Kim Wilson x

Human Resources Mary Ferlan x

x x

Kentucky Clinic Jack Wireman x

KYEM Camille Crain x x

LFUCG DEEM Doreen Birkholz x x

LFUCG DEEM Pat Dugger

Medical Center Physical Plant Division Ed McClure

x

Office of Residence Life Dana Macaulay x

x x

Office of Residence Life Jim Wims x x

Parking and Transportation Services Don Thornton x

x

Parking and Transportation Services Stuart Kearns x

Page 192: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

192

Physical Plant Andrew Blues x x

Plant Assets Kathryn Brinegar

Provost Richard Greissman

Provost Wayne Ritchie x x x x

Real Properties Christine O'Brien x

Risk Management Lou Drapeau x x x x

Student Affairs Larry Crouch x x x x

Student Affairs Pat Terrell

Student Affairs Victor Hazard x x x

U of L Center for Hazard Research Adam Clayton King x

U of L Center for Hazard Research Andrea Pompei x x x x

U of L Center for Hazard Research Josh Human x x x x

U of L Center for Hazard Research Mike Clust x

U of L Center for Hazard Research Nate Moulder x

UK Fire Marshal Garry Beach x x

UK Fire Marshal Greg Williamson

x

UK Healthcare Good Samar. HR Pat Imerman x

UK Hospital Murray Clark

UK IT Doyle Friskney

UK Medical Center Safety Officer Sharon Berry x x x

UK Office of Emergency Management Christy Giles x x x x

UK Office of Emergency Management Therese Smith x x x x

UK Police Department Joe Monroe

x

UK Police Department Paul Grant x x

VP for Research James Tracy

x

VP's Office for Campus Services Lance Broeking x x x * Ann Thomas was added to the attendee list as a member of the committee in November 2007 but an incorrect email address was inadvertently used for the 2nd and 3rd meeting notices and she did not receive those invites.

Page 193: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

193

Appendix 4: Meeting Agendas and Notes

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

Planning Workshop November 2, 2007

University of Kentucky, Main Building Lexmark Public Room

AGENDA

9:00 - 9:15 AM Registration 9:15 - 9:20 AM Welcome and Opening Comments Christy Giles, Director

Office of Emergency Management, University of Kentucky 9:20 – 10:00 AM Overview of Hazard Mitigation Planning

Josh Human, Project Manager Center for Hazards Research and Policy Development, University of Louisville

10:00 – 10:30 AM Overview of State Planning Efforts

Camille Crain, State Hazard Mitigation Officer Kentucky Division of Emergency Management

10:30 – 10:35 AM Information and Data Needs Josh Human, Project Manager Center for Hazards Research and Policy Development, University of Louisville

10:35 – 10:45 AM Break 10:45 – 11:45 AM Break Out Session

Information and data needs

11:45 AM Reconvene 11:45-12:00 PM Closing Remarks, Next Meeting Discussion

Page 194: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

194

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

Planning Workshop November 2, 2007

NOTES

A break-out session is a structured brainstorming activity and is an efficient way of getting lots of information from the steering committee meeting attendees. The 27 attendees (including UKEM staff) were split up into 3 groups each led by a member of the CHR staff. Each attendee introduced themselves by stating their name, position, affiliation or agency and their experience with natural hazards. Following the introductions, each member of the group shared what type of information they could offer for the hazard mitigation plan. During this process, the CHR staff kept notes on a large notepad set up in front of each group. Below are the 3 questions that were asked of the group, as well the notes which were broken down according to the 3 groups. _______________________________ 3 Questions: There were 3 questions asked of each group during the break out session:

1. Data and information a. Write down the contact and the information for each member of the break-out

group. 2. Hazard Rank Sheet

a. Rank the hazards and write them down and discuss 3. Other contacts

a. Using the sheet provided in the packet, add any contacts who should be involved in the process.

______________________________ Group 1 Garry Beach – UK Fire Marshall Lou Drapeau – Risk Management Mary Ferlan – HR Victor Hazard – Student Affairs Sarah Nikirk – Auxiliary Services Wayne Ritchie – Provost Linus Walton – Agriculture Kim Wilson – HR

Risk Management Lou Drapeau from Risk Management told us he had Building data, including State Fire & Tornado Fund which will be a great source of historical data. He also has information on all university owned property and hazard occurrence data/dates for UK campus. Has data on floods and floodplain maps. Has information on UK utility systems including boilers and machinery. Has information about the concentration of employee populations from his workers comp insurance policy data.

Page 195: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

195

Mentioned having data on which hazards the university is insured for and how much coverage they have. Gave Linda Rockerd’s name as a contact regarding insurance information.

Housing Department Sarah Nikirk told us that the Housing Department will have information on populations of building throughout the day.

Student Affairs Victor Hazard of Student Affairs mentioned that he had information on residence life including fraternities and sororities, university apartment data including graduate students and students with families the Housing Department would have. Said to look into the summer camp population.

Provost Office Wayne Ritchie mentioned Chuck Stapen as a good contact for relevant information. Wayne Ritchie of the Provost Office noted that there is an equipment inventory for everything greater than $1,000 and for $2,000. The contact for this data would be Catherine Brinager with the Plant Assets Department.

UK Fire Department Garry Beach UK Fire Marshall remembered 2 winter storms on campus and a tornado during his tenure with the university. Has information on fires and on fire alarms.

Agriculture Department Linus Walton from the Agriculture Department gave us Paul Warner’s name as a contact for the 4-H camps held at the various extension offices throughout the state. Bill Peterson regarding Agriculture Research Farms and Steve Bollard as a contact for the Forestry Dept. (Robinson Forest) Noted that mine subsidence is a risk at the Robinson Forest. Farm transportation data can be located thru Linus Walton in the Agriculture Department.

Additional notes: Flooding at Commonwealth Stadium was mentioned by Lou Drapeau and the fact that Young Library was built on a sinkhole was mentioned by Linus Walton of the Agriculture Department. Regarding Extreme Heat, Sarah Nikirk with Auxiliary Services noted that there are 4 residence halls without central air conditioning. Linus noted that College of Agriculture faces risks with extreme heat because animals and greenhouses are both vulnerable. Mentioned signage on campus that says UK is a “Storm Ready Campus” but neither knew exactly what this meant. Our group noted that the hazards with the greatest risk were tornado, severe storm, winter storm, and floods. The group told us that Transportation information would be located under the Facilities Management Group. The group remembered past flooding occurrences in the basement of the Facilities Management Group Bldg., the Physical Plant Services Building, and the Hospital Service Ramp is prone to flooding.

Page 196: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

196

The group noted that Joe Crouch with Capital Project Management would have a useful Facilities Plan. The group also stated that Joe Crouch should have a facilities condition assessment on all academic buildings that is a written report that would be very useful.

The group also listed Andrew Blues with the Physical Plant as having GIS data on campus populations of buildings and classrooms. He also should have GIS maps of utilities of the campus. Group 2 Christy Giles – UKEM Lance Broeking – VP’s Office for Campus Services Joe Crouch – Capital Project Mgt. Larry Crouch – Student Affairs Doreen Birkholz – LFUCG DEEM Dana Macaulay – Office of Residential Life Pat Imerman – UK Healthcare- HR John Zachem – Campus Physical Plant Division Jack Applegate – Campus Physical Plant Division

Campus Services - Lance Broeking oversees a lot of the campus groups Tracking of lease space, transportation, real property information for facilities spread across the state.

KYEM - Christy Giles data on facilities, sink-hole data

Past, present, future capital requests to legislature

Facilities Planning, Capital Projects - Joe Crouch

VFA conditions assessment and survey (main campus, research facilities) Replacement Values of campus buildings

City of Lexington - Doreen Birkholz Josh Human has all the data compiled from City of Lexington’s Plan

Student Affairs – Larry Crouch Student safety issues, greek houses, health services, dining halls/cafeteria

Student data – 27,000 commuting students/ living outside campus housing

Residential Life – Dana Macaulay working on technology for hour by hour statistics of when students are on campus

Concerns with residential storm shelter areas Weather emergency radio systems at residential front desks

Samaritan Hospital – Pat Imerman

Hospital data, rental properties associate dollar value risk to UK content, research, staff value patients

Page 197: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

197

Infrastructure/Physical Plant – John Zachem and Jack Applegate

How different hazards affect different structures, GIS Maps Value for infrastructure related to utilities

Critical infrastructures, plans locations that show infrastructure, events and reaction to events

List of buildings on generators, some critical buildings do not have generators Building data – History of floods, which buildings flood Tornado damage – Farms, tennis building siding Plans for reducing flood damage, concepts, budget numbers Group 3 Jim Wims – Residential Life Tony Blanton – Dean of Students Therese Smith – UKEM Camille Crain – KYEM David Hibbard – Environmental Health Daryoush Marefat – Communications Andrew Blues – Physical Plant Dept Michelle Ellington – Physical PlantDept Stewart Kearns – Parking and Transp. Sharon Berry – UK Medical Center

Residential Life 30 undergraduate dormitories Graduate Students Handled by Auxiliary Services – invite to next meeting (about 1,500 additional Pop.)

Some classrooms are also located in Residential Life Dorms – Dining Halls

Physical Plant Register data by GIS – Where classes are, how many

Main campus is mapped Building Assessment info – from space inventory Have some point data for other buildings around Fayette but not outside Physical Plant also has data for other utilities Capital improvements have population information Parking information kept by PPD

Communications Building in parking structure (basement) – 50 pop

All entrance/exit for building Have data for all cable/utility

Hospital HVA have – About to start 2008, construction and flooding/fire – only for hospital

Some stormwater is mapped

Environmental Health Safety – Hazardous Material data – can be location, not by type (sensitive info.) Have GIS of mailing addresses College of Agriculture handles the Ag Extension Offices

Page 198: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

198

Additional Notes:

Also have Medical Clinics around the state University Master plan – sinkhole information Danger in tunnel during a hazardous event It also would be helpful to look at the athletic facilities – info by Campus and Recreation – Tony Blanton Natural Hazard Ranking – The feeling from group is that fire is the greatest threat – lots of fire mitigation is ongoing. UK builds detention basins with each building – do they have a drainage plan (master?) Questions about Sororities/Frats on/off campus

Hazard Ranking Exercise Finally, the Hazard Ranking sheet was used in order to gauge how the group would rank the 13 natural hazards and how much UK is threatened by each. The ranking exercise allowed the Steering Committee to understand the full range of hazards that need to be considered in the plan. Below are the results of the 21 Ranking Worksheets that were collected by the CHR staff. An average was calculated for each natural hazard and a new ranking is assigned for each hazard. The new ranking represents how all 3 groups felt each hazards is most (1) or least (13) likely to occur.

Natural Hazard Ranking Results

Severe Storm 1 Tornado 2 Winter Storm 3 Hailstorm 4 Flood

5

Extreme Heat 6 Drought 7 Karst/Sinkhole 8 Earthquake 9 Wildfire 10 Mine Subsidence 11 Landslide 12 Dam Failure 13

Page 199: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

199

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

Steering Committee Meeting

April 18, 2008 University of Kentucky, Complex Commons Room 308 A/B

AGENDA

9:00-9:15 AM Registration 9:15-9:30 AM Welcome and Opening Comments Christy Giles, Director

Office of Emergency Management, University of Kentucky 9:30 – 10:00 AM Building UK’s GIS database Andrew Blues, Information Technology Manager I, UK PPD Michelle Ellington, GIS Analyst, UK PPD 10:00 – 10:45 AM Overview of Planning Process and Risk Assessment

Josh Human, Associate Director Center for Hazards Research and Policy Development, University of Louisville

10:45-10:55 AM Break 10:55 – 11:20 AM Discussion on Critical Facilities

Josh Human, Associate Director Center for Hazards Research and Policy Development, University of Louisville

11:20-11:30 AM Closing Remarks, Next Meeting Discussion

Page 200: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

200

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

Steering Committee Meeting

April 18, 2008

NOTES

Discussion on Critical Facilities • Linus Walton- There is a different ranking system besides “excellent, fair, and poor”. • How are the critical facilities ranked?

o They are either critical or not, that is something that committee decides. o Camille- As a state, if these buildings go down, the campus cannot run.

• Research is looked at as another variable. If these buildings are hit, is the entire campus going to have to be shut down??

• From state and federal perspective, list needs to match with the definition for critical facilities.

• Housing – If students cannot be housed, then that would be a detriment to the function of the campus.

o 5,000 housed of 24,000 is not large enough to make a dent on the entire university.

• Committee members looked at critical facilities ranking sheet and highlighted those to keep and those to take off.

• Take off: o Scott Street Bldg (Former Military barracks) o Main Administration Building (burned in 2001) o Funkhouser Building o Scovell Hall (ag communications and HR) o Communications Building (more offices and inventory but not a priority) o Electric HVAC Building (This is a teaching building) o Emergency Management Office o Real Properties Office

• Keep: o Frank D. Peterson Service Building o McVey Hall (could replace 25 and 64) o Parking Garage #2 (central communications for entire campus) o Chandler Medical Center and Hospital

• What does operations mean? (David) o Christy- Buildings would have a very dramatic impact on the operation. o Camille – State and federal (I can shelter people in other places if houses are

affected) Will the town still run if people are relocated? Communications is #1 in a post-disaster setting.

• Lance – Where is the central utility plant? o Environmental health and safety – If they are hit and pollutants are released, then

that could have a major impact. • Linus Walton – Land Grant University and if you lose laboratories, then you lose

teaching and research dollars.

Page 201: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

201

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

Steering Committee Meeting

November 19, 2008 University of Kentucky, Student Center Room 359

AGENDA

9:00-9:15 AM Registration 9:15-9:30 AM Welcome and Opening Comments Christy Giles, Director

Office of Emergency Management, University of Kentucky 9:30 – 10:00 AM Risk Assessment Overview

Josh Human, Associate Director Center for Hazards Research and Policy Development, University of Louisville

10:00-10:10 AM Break 10:10– 11:45 AM Develop Mitigation Strategy

Josh Human, Associate Director Center for Hazards Research and Policy Development, University of Louisville

11:45-12:00 AM Closing Remarks, Next Meeting Discussion

Page 202: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

202

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

Steering Committee Meeting

November 19, 2008

NOTES

Feedback for Meeting three was recorded and incorporated into the Mitigation Action Matrix for use in the draft plan document. A very interactive brainstorming session followed and a number of strategies were identified for inclusion in the plan. The steering committee members received two handouts to assist the mitigation action brainstorming session. To do items: Send out historic hazard events spreadsheet to Steering Committee for input. Also, contact Lou Drapeau for addition hazard information

Check on the Johnson Center for student recreation – the age of this building on the maps was incorrect. Lou Drapeau can also track a study for drainage

Page 203: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

203

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

Presentation of Draft Plan

March 13, 2009 University of Kentucky, WT Young Library Auditorium

AGENDA

9:00 - 9:15 AM Registration 9:15 - 9:20 AM Welcome and Opening Comments Christy Giles, Director

Office of Emergency Management, University of Kentucky 9:20 – 9:30 AM Introduction and Overview of the Plan

Josh Human, Project Manager Center for Hazards Research and Policy Development, University of Louisville

9:30 – 9:50 AM Planning Process

Andrea Pompei, Graduate Research Assistant Center for Hazards Research and Policy Development, University of Louisville

9:50 – 10:20 AM Risk Assessment

Josh Human, Project Manager Center for Hazards Research and Policy Development, University of Louisville

10:20 – 10:35 AM Mitigation Strategy

Andrea Pompei, Graduate Research Assistant Center for Hazards Research and Policy Development, University of Louisville

10:35- 10:50 AM Plan Maintenance Process

Josh Human, Project Manager Center for Hazards Research and Policy Development, University of Louisville

10:50-11:00 AM Questions and Feedback

Page 204: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

204

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

Steering Committee Meeting

March 13, 2009 NOTES

Introduction – Christy Giles spoke and emphasized the results that have already been seen by the plan. Also mentioned that the draft document will be available next week at on the CHR website. Josh Human – spoke about DMA 2000 and its importance for eligibility of hazard mitigation project funding. Andrea Pompei spoke about the Planning Process to date. Josh Human provided an overview of the risk assessment that will be available for review in the draft plan document that will be posted on the CHR website on Wednesday, March 18th. He emphasized the difficulty in developing a probability of hazard events due to limited historic hazard event information. The risk assessment needs each facility to be geo-located, which CHR tried their best to do, but for future plan updates could be completed for all facilities.

A question was asked about the timeframe of the data. The data dates back to the 1860’s from the Minutes of the UK Board of Trustees. The police and fire logs from LFUCG were not used to develop the hazard profile of the plan.

A question was asked about UK ownership of Agricultural Extension Facilities. UK does not own all of the facilities.

A Steering Committee member mentioned that a road name was incorrect on the main campus map: Tate’s Creek. This road name should be changed for the plan document.

Andrea Pompei provided an overview of the Mitigation Strategy section of the plan, explaining the rationale behind the mitigation action prioritization and benefit-cost determinations. Josh Human then went over the Plan Maintenance section of the plan, informing the Steering Committee that the plan would have to be updated in five years. UKEM would take charge on updating the plan and ensuring that the plan maintenance takes place among the Steering Committee and public. He also explained that in many plan updates, mitigation actions might be taken out if they are determined to be unattainable or no longer desirable by the Steering Committee. He stressed that the Steering Committee needs to consider new ways of tracking data for future plan updates.

A question was asked to clarify the benefit-cost matrix. Andrea Pompei and Josh Human answered the question by explaining that the benefit-cost matrix is qualitative in nature, as it is nearly impossible to determine a true quantitative benefit-cost analysis until the hard numbers are available on a project-by-project basis. When a project is available a true benefit-cost will be completed, but the qualitative matrix is used to generally determine the priority for benefit-cost.

The meeting was then adjourned and a flyer was passed out to show the website information for the draft plan location.

Page 205: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

205

Appendix 5: Flyer for Draft Plan Feedback Please provide us feedback on the UK Hazard Mitigation Draft Plan: Draft Plan Location: http://hazardcenter.louisville.edu The Draft will be available online on Wednesday, March 18th. Feedback is due Wednesday, April 1st to: Andrea Pompei, email: [email protected] Research Assistant fax: 502.852.4558

phone: 502.852.2927

Page 206: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

206

Appendix 6: Online Public Meeting Announcement

Page 207: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

207

Appendix 7: Public Meeting Agenda

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

Public Meeting

12:00 p.m.-1:00 p.m. March 13, 2009 University of Kentucky, WT Young Library Auditorium

AGENDA

12:00 – 12:05 PM Welcome and Opening Comments Christy Giles, Director

Office of Emergency Management, University of Kentucky 12:05- 12:15 PM Introduction and Overview of the Plan

Josh Human, Project Manager Center for Hazards Research and Policy Development, University of Louisville

12:15-12:25 PM Planning Process

Andrea Pompei, Graduate Research Assistant Center for Hazards Research and Policy Development, University of Louisville

12:25-12:45 PM Risk Assessment Josh Human, Project Manager Center for Hazards Research and Policy Development, University of Louisville

12:45-12:55 PM Mitigation Strategy & Plan Maintenance Process

Andrea Pompei, Graduate Research Assistant Center for Hazards Research and Policy Development, University of Louisville

12:55 – 1:00 PM Questions and Feedback

Page 208: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

208

Appendix 8: Hazard Ranking Worksheet and Results

Hazard Ranking Worksheet Below is a list of 13 natural hazards to be included in the UK Hazard Mitigation Plan. Please rank the following list of hazards from 1-13: 1 would be most likely to occur 13 would be the least likely to occur ____ Dam Failure ____ Karst/Sinkhole ____ Hailstorm ____ Mine Subsidence ____ Tornado ____ Winter Storm ____ Severe Storm ____ Earthquake ____ Extreme Heat ____ Flood ____ Drought ____ Landslide ____ Wildfire Below please write the name(s) of other contacts not listed on the steering committee list that may be beneficial for us to contact regarding the UK Hazard Mitigation Plan: Name Title Agency/Organization Phone/Email

Page 209: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

209

Hazard Ranking Worksheet

Break-out group exercise - Nov. 2, 2007

Dam Failure Hailstorm Tornado

Severe Storm

Extreme Heat Drought Wildfire

Karst/ Sinkhole

Mine Subsidence

Winter Storm Earthquake Flood Landslide

1 9 2 1 3 11 12 8 5 13 4 7 6 10

2 10 5 1 2 6 7 9 11 12 8 4 3 13

3 13 5 2 3 9 7 10 6 11 1 8 4 12

4 13 4 1 2 7 6 10 9 12 2 8 4 11

5 13 9 1 2 7 10 11 4 5 3 8 6 12

6 11 5 1 2 9 7 8 6 12 3 10 4 13

7 13 10 1 2 6 7 11 5 9 3 8 4 12

8 12 3 4 1 5 6 9 10 11 2 8 7 13

9 13 5 4 1 7 6 12 8 10 3 9 2 11

10 13 3 1 2 5 6 11 9 10 4 8 7 12

11 11 5 1 2 4 8 10 9 12 3 6 7 13

12 13 5 3 1 7 8 10 6 12 4 9 2 11

13 12 2 4 1 3 6 11 9 13 5 8 7 10

14 13 7 2 1 9 8 10 6 12 3 5 4 11

15 13 4 6 3 7 5 11 8 12 2 9 1 10

16 9 3 4 1 5 7 12 8 13 2 10 6 11

17 12 3 4 2 8 7 9 10 11 1 5 6 13

18 3 1 3 1 2 3 11 4 12 1 6 1 12

19 13 6 5 1 4 3 10 9 12 2 8 7 11

20 11 3 4 1 5 6 10 9 13 2 8 7 12

21 13 5 3 6 2 4 10 8 12 1 9 7 11

AVERAGE RANKING

12 5 3 2 6 7 10 8 11 3 8 5 12

COUNT 21

3 most likely believed to occur: Tornado

Severe Storm

Winter Storm

3 least likely believed to occur: Dam Failure

Mine Subsidence

Landslide

Page 210: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

210

Appendix 9: Status of Dams in Kentucky by County Summary Status of Dams in KY by County (Fiscal Years 2000-2001: A Report to the Congress)

Class A,B & C Dams in KY by County 2003

County Class A (low)

Class B (moderate)

Class C (high)

County Class A (low)

Class B (moderate)

Class C (high)

Adair 2 1 Laurel 5 3 2 Anderson 2 1 1 Lawrence 3 1 1 Ballard 3 1 Lee 12 4 Barren 4 Leslie 3 Bath 6 2 1 Letcher 1 4 Bell 1 2 3 Lewis 1 1 Boone 15 4 1 Lincoln 5 7 Bourbon 7 2 Livingston 4 Boyd 1 1 2 Logan 11 5 2 Boyle 1 1 1 Lyon 1 Bracken 3 McCracken 1 2 Breathitt 1 McCreary 6 3 Breckinridge 11 3 1 McLean 1 1 Bullitt 11 4 3 Madison 8 4 8 Butler 12 1 Magoffin 1 Caldwell 8 3 Marion 5 4 2 Calloway 6 2 Marshall 4 2 Campbell 3 3 6 Martin 1 1 Carlisle 17 6 Mason 7 1 Carroll 3 4 Meade 2 1 Carter 2 1 2 Menifee 1 1 1 Casey 1 2 Mercer 4 1 1 Christian 24 4 4 Metcalfe 2 Clark 7 2 Monroe 2 1 Clay 1 1 Montgomery 5 2 5 Clinton 2 Muhlenberg 23 5 3

Page 211: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

211

Summary Status of Dams in KY by County (Fiscal Years 2000-2001: A Report to the Congress) Class A,B & C Dams in KY by County 2003

Crittenden 3 1 Nelson 13 11 2 Daviess 17 2 1 Nicholas 1 2 2 Edmundson 5 Ohio 9 3 1

Elliott 1 1 Oldham 11 4 4 Estill 4 1 1 Owen 7 2 Fayette 10 4 6 Owsley 1 Fleming 5 1 6 Pendleton 3 1 Floyd 2 2 Perry 1 1 Franklin 7 4 Pike 1 2 Gallatin 3 1 Powell 6 3 Garrard 2 3 1 Pulaski 8 1 Grant 8 4 2 Robertson 1 Graves 24 4 3 Rockcastle 1 1 Grayson 9 8 1 Rowan 2 Greenup 5 1 Russell 9 6 2 Hancock 9 4 1 Scott 12 7 2 Hardin 7 2 4 Shelby 28 2 3 Harlan 1 3 Simpson 2 1 Harrison 7 1 Spencer 5 1 1 Hart 1 Taylor 7 1 Henderson 11 3 1 Todd 9 2 1 Henry 10 4 2 Trigg 2 Hickman 5 1 Trimble 5 1 Hopkins 11 6 7 Union 2 5 Jackson 3 2 4 Warren 3 2 Jefferson 18 11 9 Washington 14 3 Jessamine 3 2 Wayne 4 3 1 Johnson 1 Webster 4 3 1 Kenton 13 6 Whitley 2 1

Page 212: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

212

Summary Status of Dams in KY by County (Fiscal Years 2000-2001: A Report to the Congress) Class A,B & C Dams in KY by County 2003

Knott 1 Wolfe 2 1 Knox 2 3 1 Woodford 11 Larue 4 1 2 Total 361 120 99 Total 299 100 75

Page 213: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

213

Appendix 10: Asset Hazard Vulnerability Chart Bu

ildin

g Nu

mbe

r

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

0001 TAYLOR EDUCATION 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0002 SCOTT STREET BUILDING 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0003 RESEARCH FACILITY #1 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0004 CENTRAL HEATING PLANT #2 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0005 FD PETERSON SERVICE BLDG 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0006 HOLMES HALL 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 00065767 STONE FENCING/COLDSTREAM FARM 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 00066430 SHAVING STORAGE SHED 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 00066432 EEP STORAGE BLDG. 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 0006T PLANT HOLDING BUILDING 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 0007 JEWELL HALL 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0007T NEW GREENHOUSE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 0008 BOYD HALL 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0009 PATTERSON HALL 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0010 HAMILTON HOUSE - UK 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0011 KEENELAND HALL 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0011T STG TRLR BY DINNING HALL 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 0012 BLAZER HALL 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1

Page 214: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

214

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

0013 KGS CORE LIBRARY 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 0013T OUT POST #1 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 0014 BOONE FACULTY CENTER 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0014T OUT POST #2 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 0015 STURGILL DEVELOPMENT BLDG 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0015T STAFF TRAILOR 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 0016 PARKING BOOTH KENTUCKY CLINIC 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0016T BIRD BLIND 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 0017 DICKEY HALL 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0017T MUZZLE LOADER SHOOTING RG 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 0018 FACULTY CLUB PARKING BOOTH 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0019 MEMORIAL COLISEUM 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0020 GARAGE ENG TRANSPORTATION 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0020T DUGOUT #1 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0021 ENG RES/SCHOOL OF MUSIC 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0021T DUGOUT #2 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0022 FINE ARTS GUIGNOL 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0022T STORAGE TRAILER 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 0023 UK POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1

Page 215: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

215

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

0023T STORAGE TRAILER 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 0024 LAFFERTY HALL 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0025 WHITE HALL CLASSROOM BLDG 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0026 STUDENT CENTER ADDITION 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0026T NEW STORAGE 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 0027 PATTERSON OFFICE TOWER 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0028 BARKER HALL / BUELL ARMORY 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0029 ALUMNI GYM 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0030 STUDENT CENTER 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0031 FRAZEE HALL 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0031T SHEEP SILO #1 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 0032 MAIN ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0032T SHEEP SILO #2 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 0033 EZRA GILLIS BUILDING 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0034 BUSINESS ECON BLDG 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 00347A UK-STORAGE BLDG 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0035 MILLER HALL 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0038 MINING LABORATORY 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0039 KING LIBRARY 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1

Page 216: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

216

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

0040 MAXWELL PLACE 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0041 PENCE HALL 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0042 GREHAN JOURNALISM 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0043 SJ SAM WHALEN BLDG 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0044 KASTLE HALL 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0045 MC VEY HALL 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0046 ANDERSON HALL-TOWER 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0047 CW MATHEWS BLDG 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0048 LAW BUILDING 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0049 MEMORIAL HALL - UK 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0050 ERIKSON HALL 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0051 MINERAL INDUSTRIES BLDG 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0052 CIVIL ENGINEERING 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0053 SLONE RESEARCH BLDG 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0054 FUNKHOUSER 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0055 CHEMISTRY-PHYSICS 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0056 BRECKINGRIDGE HALL 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0057 KINKEAD HALL 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0058 BRADLEY HALL 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1

Page 217: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

217

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

0059 BOWMAN HALL 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0060 RESEARCH & DEV CTR 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0061 TOBACCO RESEARCH LAB 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0061A GREENHOUSE - UK 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0061B GREENHOUSE - UK 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0061C GREENHOUSE - UK 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0062 INSECTORY CONSERVATORY 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0062B GREENHOUSE - UK 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0062C GREENHOUSE - UK 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0062D GREENHOUSE - UK 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0063 SHED BY 491 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 0064 SCOVELL HALL 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0065 SMALL ANIMAL LAB 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0066 AGRONOMY H HOUSE-G HOUSE 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0066A GREENHOUSE A-1 - UK 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0066B GREENHOUSE A-2 - UK 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0067 CHI OMEGA SORORITY - UK 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0068 DELTA DELTA DELTA SORORITY 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0069 ALPHA DELTA PI SORORITY 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1

Page 218: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

218

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

0070 WENNER-GREN RESEARCH LAB 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0071 FOOD STORAGE K-LAIRL 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0072 DONOVAN HALL 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0073 THOMAS POE COOPER BLDG 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0075 KELLY HALL 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0076 DIMMOCK ANIMAL PATHOLOGY 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0078 MEDICAL CENTER ANNEX #5 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0082 COLLEGE OF PHARMACY 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0085 MED CTR HEATING-COOLING 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0086 COLLEGE OF MEDICINE OFC 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0087 MED CENTER STORAGE FAC 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0088 AG MOTOR POOL 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0089 COOLING PLANT #1 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0091 AG SCIENCE CENTER & AUD 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0092 SEED HOUSE 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0093 ROACH BEN CANCER BLDG 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0094 COOPER HOUSE 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0096 COMBS CANCER RESEARCH 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0097 ES GOOD BARN 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3

Page 219: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

219

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

0098 MRISC /WOMEN'S CANCER FACILITY 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0099 GLUCK EQUINE BLDG 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 0101 REYNOLDS WAREHOUSE #1 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0102 REYNOLDS WAREHOUSE #2 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0103 REYNOLDS WAREHOUSE #3 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0105 COMMONWEALTH VILLAGE #2 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 0106 COMMONWEALTH VILLAGE 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 0107 MINING/MINERALS BLDG 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0108 ROBOTICS FACILITY 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0110 MAINTENANCE BLDG-ATHLETIC 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0111 HAGGIN HALL 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0112 ALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0113 SHIVELY SPORTS CENTER 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0114 TRACK STORAGE BLDG 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0115 ALPHA GAMMA RHO FRATERNITY 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0118 FRATERNITIES HOUSE STG 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0119 ALUMNI BLDG 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0121 SIGMA NU - UK 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0122 DELTA GAMMA SORORITY 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1

Page 220: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

220

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

0124 DELTA ZETA SORORITY 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0125 KAPPA ALPHA THETA SORORITY 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0126 PHI DELTA THETA FRATERNITY 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0127 ALPHA GAMMA DELTA SORORITY 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0128 KAPPA DELTA SORORITY 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0129 SIGMA KAPPA SORORITY 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0130 COOPERSTOWN BLDG A 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0131 COOPERSTOWN BLDG B 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0132 COOPERSTOWN BLDG C 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0133 COOPERSTOWN BLDG D 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0134 COOPERSTOWN BLDG E 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0135 COOPERSTOWN BLDG F 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0136 COOPERSTOWN BLDG G 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0137 LAMDA CHI ALPHA FRATERNITY 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0138 PHI SIGMA KAPPA FRATERNITY 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0140 KAPPA SIGMA FRATERNITY 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0142 FARMHOUSE FRATERNITY 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0143 DORM COMPLEX LR-7B2 (BLANDING 2) 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0144 DORM COMPLEX LR-6B3 (BLANDING 3) 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1

Page 221: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

221

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

0145 D COMPLEX-BLANDING (BLANDING TOWER) 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0146 DORM COMPLEX 5B4 (BLANDING 4) 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0147 DORM COMPLEX CENTRAL FAC 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0148 DORM COMPLEX 4K4 (KIRWAN 4) 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0149 DORM COMPLEX KIRWAN (KIRWAN TOWER) 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0150 DORM COMPLEX LR 3K (KIRWAN 3) 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0151 DORM COMPLEX LR 2K2 (KIRWAN 2) 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0152 DORM COMPLEX LR 1K1 (KIRWAN 1 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0153 DORM COMPLEX LR8B1 (BLANDING 1) 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0154 SCIENCE BLDG 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0155 GREENHOUSE #2 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0156 GREENHOUSE #4 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0157 GREENHOUSE #7 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0158 GREENHOUSE #5 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0159 GREENHOUSE #3 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0160 GREENHOUSE #1 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0161 GREENHOUSE #9 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0162 GREENHOUSE #11 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0163 GREENHOUSE #6 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1

Page 222: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

222

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

0164 HORTICULTURE GREENHOUSE 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0177 RESIDENCE MOTOR POOL 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0182 ISOLATION BARN/INCINERATOR 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0183 ISOLATION BARN 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0184 AG MACHINERY RESEARCH LAB 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0185 CARPORT FOR BLDG. 177 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0189 SHAWNEETOWN A 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0190 SHAWNEETOWN B 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0191 SHAWNEETOWN D 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0192 SHAWNEETOWN F 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0193 SHAWNEETOWN E 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0194 SHAWNEETOWN C 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0197 PARKING STRUCTURE #1 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0198 PARKING STRUCTURE #2 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0199 PARKING STRUCTURE #3 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0200 CHARLES T. WETHINGTON JR. BUILDING 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0202 PARKING STRUCTURE #5 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0204 COOLING PLANT #2 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0207 METAL ARTS BUILDING 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1

Page 223: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

223

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

0209 CENTRIFUGE BUILDING 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0210 REYNOLDS WAREHOUSE #4 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0211 MAXWELL PLACE GARAGE 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0212 LANCASTER AQUATIC CENTER 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0213 BOONE TENNIS COMPLEX 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0214 FLAMMABLE STORAGE BLDG 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0215 GARRIGUS BLDG 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0216 MULTI-DISC RESEARCH FAC 2 4 2 0 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 0217 SUBSTATION #2 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0219 SEATON HPER BLDG 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0220 BERNARD JOHNSON STUDENT RECREATION CENTER 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0222 COMMONWEALTH STADIUM 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0223 UNIV MEDICAL PLAZA 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0224 MI KING LIBRARY ANNEX 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0225 TH MORGAN BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0227 RECREATION EQ BLDG 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0229 AGR DISTRIBUTION CENTER 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0230 SANDERS BROWN 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 0231 FARM MAINT STORAGE SHED 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3

Page 224: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

224

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

0232 NURSING 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0235 J. OSWALD BLDG. 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0236 TOBACCO & HEALTH 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0237 WENNER-GREN RSCH ADDITION 2 5 2 2 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0238 APARTMENTS/16 UNITS - UK 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0240 APARTMENTS/10 UNITS-UK 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0241 SINGLETARY CENTER 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0242 WILDCAT LODGE 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0243 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 1 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0244 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 2 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0245 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 3 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0246 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 4 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0247 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 5 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0248 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 6 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0249 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 7 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0250 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 8 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0251 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 9 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0252 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 10 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0253 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 11 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3

Page 225: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

225

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

0254 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 12 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0255 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 13 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0256 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 14 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0257 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 15 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0258 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 16 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0259 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 17 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0260 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 18 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0261 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 19 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0262 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 20 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0263 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 21 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0264 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 22 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0265 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 23 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0266 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 24 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0267 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 25 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0268 FOOD STORE LAUNDRY 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0269 COMMUNICATIONS BUILDING 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0272 INFORMATION BUILDING 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0274 MOLONEY BLDG 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0275 POUNDSTONE REG SERVICES 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3

Page 226: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

226

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

0276 AG ENGINEERING BUILDING 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0277 NUTTER FOOTBALL BLDG 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0278 PPD STORAGE BLDG 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0279 MAT STORAGE BLDG 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0281 OLIVER H RAYMOND CENTER 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0282 GAS STORAGE BLDG M & M 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0283 HAGAN BASEBALL STADIUM 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0283B BASEBALL TICKET OFFICE 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0283C BASEBALL DUGOUT #1 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0283D BASEBALL DUGOUT #2 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0283E UPPER LEVEL PRESS BOX 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0283F LOWER LEVEL PRESS BOX 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0284 KENTUCKY CLINIC 2 4 2 0 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 0285 NUTTER FIELD HOUSE 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0286 ASTECC 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0287 ELECTRIC HVAC BLDG 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0288 GREENHOUSE & LAB 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0289 HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0293 UK HOSPITAL 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1

Page 227: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

227

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

0294 GILL HEART INSTITUTE 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0297 DENTAL 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0298 MEDICAL SCIENCE 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0300 ARBORETUM TOOL SHED 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0301 RENTAL PROPERTIES 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0302 DORTHA SMITH OATTS VISITOR CENTER 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0305 HEALTH SCIENCE RESEARCH 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0312 PLANT SCIENCE BUILDING 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0314 RENTAL PROPERTIES 2 5 2 2 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0315 HUMANITIES COUNSEL 2 5 2 2 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0322 417 COLUMBIA AVENUE 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0333 APPLACHIAN CENTER ANNEX 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0336 THOMAS D CLARK BLDG 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0337 5-CAR GARAGE 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0343 BINGHAM DAVIS HOUSE 2 5 2 2 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0344 RAY F BETTS HOUSE 2 5 2 2 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0345 MAX KADE GERMAN HOUSE 2 5 2 2 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0346 RESIDENCE - UK 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0347 OFFICES 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1

Page 228: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

228

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

0347A UK-STORAGE BLDG 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0348 RESIDENCE-UK 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0349 FACULTY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0350 CENTER FOR DRUG & ALCOHOL RESEARCH 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0351 JEFF HARRIS PSYCH SERVICE CTR 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0353 OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0361 RESIDENCE-UK 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0362 RESIDENCE-UK 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0363 RESIDENCE-UK 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0365 RESIDENCE W/DETCH GARAGE 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0377 STUDENT HOUSING - UK 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0378 STUDENT HOUSING - UK 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0381 3-UNIT APT BUILDING 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 0386 150 GAZETTE AVENUE 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 0387 RENTAL - GAZETTE 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 0390 BUS SHELTER #1 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0391 BUS SHELTER #2 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0392 BUS SHELTER #3 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0394 BUS SHELTER #6 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1

Page 229: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

229

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

0396 BUS SHELTER #8 2 4 2 0 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 0397 BUS SHELTER #9 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0398 BUS SHELTER #10 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0399 BUS SHELTER #11 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0400 ELLEN H RICHARDS HS 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0401 WELDON HOUSE 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0402 SCHOOL FOUR MUSIC AC OFC 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0405B SCHOOL OF MUSIC/COMPONETS 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0405C SCHOOL OF MUSIC/COMPONENT 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0405D SCHOOL OF MUSIC/COMPONENT 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0408 RENTAL UNITS/LINDEN WALK ROAD 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0412 403 PENNSYLVANIA CT 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0413 LOCKER/SHOWER/RESTROOM-UK 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0416 BUS SHELTER #12 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0417 LEARNING SERVICES CENTER 2 4 2 0 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 0418 COMMONWEALTH BUS STOP RED 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0419 BUS SHELTER #13 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0420 CHILD DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH CENTER 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0420B UK - RENTAL PROPERTY 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1

Page 230: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

230

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

0428 2 RENTAL UNITS - UK 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0432 COMMONWEALTH HOUSE 2 5 2 2 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0433 SCHMIDT VOCAL ARTS 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0442 LIGON HOUSE 2 4 2 0 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 0449 SHIVELY GROUNDS STORAGE BLDG 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0450 SOFTBALL MAINTENANCE 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0451 SOCCERFIELD COMPLEX 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0452 SOFTBALL COMPLEX 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0453 SHIVELY GROUNDS BLDG 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0456 WT YOUNG LIBRARY 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0460 CENTER ON DRUG & ALCOHOL RESEARCH 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 0461 UK MED CTR 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 0467 220 TRANSCRIPT AVE 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 0473 RESIDENCE 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0481 LCC ACADEMIC/TECH 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0482 RESIDENCE-UK 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0484 518 OLDHAM CT. GARAGE 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0485 BOONE TENNIS STADIUM 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0487 UK-RENTAL PROPERTY 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1

Page 231: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

231

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

0489 MEDICAL CENTER OFFICE 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 0490 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MGT 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0491 ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 0494 JAMES W STUCKERT CAREER 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0495 JAMES F HARDYMAN BUILDING 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0496 JAPAN SAT SCHOOL UNIT 3 2 4 2 0 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 0498 JAPAN SAT SCHOOL OFFICE 2 4 2 0 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 0499 JAPAN SAT SCHOOL CLASS 2 4 2 0 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 0500 ACADEMIC FACILITIES BLDG 1 1 1 0 2 0 3 0 2 1 0 3 0503 RALPH G ANDERSON BUILDING 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0504 SIGMA CHI FRATERNITY 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0505 SIGMA PHI EPSILON 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0506 ROBERT STRAUS BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH BUILDING 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0507 SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0509 BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH FACILTIY 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0510 456 ROSE LANE - RENTAL 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0511 RENTAL/DWELLING 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0514 CENTRAL UTILITIES PLANT 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1

0517 MERSACK / LEAVELL BLDG. (COLLEGE OF MEDICINE LEARNING CENTER 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1

Page 232: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

232

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

0518 BBRSB GENERATOR BUILDING 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 0564 IRIS PROJECT BUILDING 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0565 JOHN T. SMITH HALL 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0566 BALDWIN HALL 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0567 INGELS HALL 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0568 NORTH DORM 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0570 SILVER LAKE FARM/RENTAL 2 4 2 1 4 3 1 0 1 4 0 4 0571 PARKING STRUCTURE #6 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 0572 PARKING STRUCTURE #7 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0573 LEXEL CORP RES & DEV 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 0574 CENTER FOR PHARMACUTICAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 0582 UNIVERSITY HEALTH SERVICES 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 0585 BASEBALL TRAINING PAVILLION 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 0586 BUILDING 0586/RESIDENTIAL 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 0587 BUILDING-140 TRANSCRIPT AVENUE 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 0596 COLLEGE OF PHARMACY (NEW) 2 4 2 0 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 0600 ELIZABETHTOWN CC LIBRARY 2 2 1 1 4 4 1 0 3 3 0 4 0601 PARKING STRUCTURE #8 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 0602 PATIENT CARE FACILITY (UNDER CONSTRUCTION) 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1

Page 233: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

233

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

0603 WUKY ANTENNA 4 5 2 0 5 2 2 0 4 4 2 3 0604 JOE CRAFT CENTER 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0611 SAMARITAN MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING 2 5 2 2 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0612 SAMARITAN CHILLER BUILDING 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0613 SAMARITAN PARKING STRUCTURE 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 0614 123 WARREN COURT 2 5 2 2 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0615 125 WARREN COURT 2 5 2 2 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0616 SEATON CENTER STORAGE 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 0800 H S LACKEY ADM BLDG 4 5 5 5 4 0 4 2 5 5 2 5 1100 ACADEMIC FACILITIES BLDG 4 5 3 5 4 0 5 0 5 3 0 5 1200 SUBSTATION #1 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 1201 SUBSTATION #3 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 1300 JOHNSON ADMIN BLDG 2 1 1 3 1 0 5 3 2 2 3 1 1500 NEWMAN HALL-SOUTHEAST CC 3 1 2 1 3 1 4 2 1 2 2 4 1600 CARSON HALL-PADUCAH CC 3 5 5 2 5 0 2 0 5 4 2 5 1608 SCIENCE & ENGINEERING BLD 3 5 5 2 5 0 2 0 5 4 2 5 2059 AFBC COAL PREP BLDG 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 2060 COLD STORAGE BLDG 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 2061 COMPRESSOR BUILDING 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1

Page 234: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

234

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

2062 GAZEBO STORAGE BUILDING 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 2063 MAINTENANCE BUILDING 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 2064 SAMPLE STORAGE BLDG 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 2065 DRYING PAD-LEASED BY UK 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 2142 VA MEDICAL HOSPITAL 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 2146 CARDINAL HILL HOSPITAL-UK 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 2147 RUPP ARENA - UK 2 5 2 2 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 2255 LOG CABIN/ALBERT STEWART 2 1 2 0 2 0 4 2 1 2 4 1 2295 HIGHLANDS REGIONAL MEDCAL 2 1 1 3 1 0 5 3 2 2 3 1 2296 MOREHEAD CLINIC - UK 4 2 1 3 2 0 5 0 3 5 3 5 2301 CRISP REPLACEMENT CENTER 3 5 5 2 5 0 2 0 5 4 2 5 2401 CENTER FOR RURAL HEALTH 3 1 3 2 3 0 5 4 3 2 5 3 2500 OFFICE SPACE/1401 CORPORATE PARK 2 4 4 4 4 0 2 4 4 2 0 4 2600 FIELD STORAGE BLDG 1 3 1 1 3 3 1 0 1 2 1 1 3002 VET SCIENCE COMPOST SHED 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3003 POULTRY RESEARCH FACILITY 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3004 PICNIC PAVILION 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3005 HORTICULTURE STORAGE BARN 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3007 HORTICULTURE CHEMICAL BLDG 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2

Page 235: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

235

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

3009 12 X 60 MOBILE HOME 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3016 DRY COW SHED 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3031 ALUMINUM RESRCH FACILITY 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3104 GRAIN SAFETY FIELD LAB 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3115 SHOP 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3116 APARTMENT GARAGE 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3117 HEIFER BARN DAIRY 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3118 CARNAHAN HOUSE 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3146 OFFICE LAB SWINE RESEARCH 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3148 SWINE METAL STORAGE 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3153 HORSE BARN 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3154 OLD DAIRY BARN WITH SILO 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3158 DAIRY HERDSMAN HOUSE 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3162 UPPER JERSEY SHED 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3163 LOWER JERSEY SHED 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3164 LOWER HOLSTEIN SHED 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3165 UPPER HOLSTEIN SHED 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3166 MILKING PARLOR 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3166A CONCRETE STAVE SILO 16X40 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2

Page 236: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

236

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

3166B CONCRETE STAVE SILO 16X40 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3166C CONCRETE STAVE SILO 16X40 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3166D CONCRETE STAVE SILO 16X40 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3166E CONCRETE STAVE SILO 20X65 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3166F HARVESTORE - COLDSTREAM 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3166G 15-TON GRAIN BIN COMPLETE 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3166J DAIRY CONVEYOR FEED SYSTEM 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3168 DAIRY MATERNITY BARN 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3169 DAIRY HOOP SHED 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3171 FIELD 21 SHED 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3172 GOAT LOT SHED 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3173 LOT 22 SHED 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3174 ANIMAL PATH SHED #3 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3175 ANIMAL PATH SHED #4 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3176 HORSE BARN A 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3177 ANIMAL PATH BARN 10 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3178 SHEEP HOUSE 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3179 SHEEP HOUSE 2 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3180 SHEEP HOUSE 3 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2

Page 237: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

237

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

3181 SHEEP HOUSE 4 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3182 ANIMAL PATH BARN 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3184 ANIMAL DIAGNOSTIC STORAGE 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3185 DAIRY OFFICE CLASSROOM 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3186 LS DISEASE DIAG CTR 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3192 DIARY ROUND HOUSE 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3193 GRAIN BIN & TOWER 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3194 FEED PROS CENTER 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3198 DAIRY CALF BARN 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 3199 DAIRY MANAGER'S RESIDENCE 3 5 1 2 5 5 2 0 5 4 0 3 3201 STUDENT QUARTERS 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3202 HORSE BARN 1 M O - M C 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3203 HOUSE M O - MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3205 GARAGE STUDENT QUARTER-MC 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3208 EQUIPMENT SHED-MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3209 EQUIPMENT SHED-MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3211 HOUSE M O - MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3212 GARAGE M O - MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3213 BARN 8 SHEEP-MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1

Page 238: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

238

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

3216 HOUSE - MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3217 HORSE BARN 11-MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3217A CONCRETE BLOCK SILO 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3217B CONCRETE BLOCK SILO 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3218 VET SCIENCE SHED 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3219 HORSE BARN 9-MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3220 HOUSE M O - MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3221 GARAGE M O-MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3222 BARN 5 M & O STORAGE-M C 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3223 UTILITY SHED STORAGE-M C 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3224 HORSE BARN 3-MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3225 MANSION-MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3227 BARN 7 M O - MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3228 UTILITY SHED M O-MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3230 HOUSE M O-MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3231 HORSE BARN 6 VETSCI-M C 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3233 HORSE RUN IN SHED-MAIN CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3234 HORSE FARM MGR RES-M C 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3236 HORSE RUN IN SHED-M C 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1

Page 239: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

239

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

3237 HORSE RUN IN SHED-MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3238 STUD BARN-MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3239 RECEIVING BARN-MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3240 SHOP & STORAGE AREA-M C 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3241 FARM SERVICE CENTER-M C 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3242 STORAGE BLDG-MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3243 AUTO BODY SHOP-MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3247 VEHICLE SHELTER-MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3248 MOBILE HOME / ID #508-15 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3250 GARAGE-MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3251 MOBILE HOME-MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3253 MOBILE HOME-MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3254 GARAGE BESIDE 3253-M C 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3255 STORAGE BLDG-MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3259 HORSE CORRAL VET SC-M C 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3260 EQUINE NUTRITIONAL-M C 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3261 POLE SHED BALE STG-M C 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3270 STUDENT QTRS HORTICUL-M C 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3271 STUDENT QTRS DAIRY-M C 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1

Page 240: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

240

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

3272 MOBILE HOME-MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3281 BARN 6 TRAILER BLDG #3281 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3282 BARN 6 TRAILER #3282 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3283 M & O STORAGE BUILDING 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3287 DWELLING MOBILE HOME 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3289 HOOP SHED #4 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3291 FEP STORAGE BLDG 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3301 HOUSE-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3302 THI GREENHOUSE 4 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3303 ENTOMOLOGY LAB-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3304 HOUSE-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3305 TOBACCO HEALTH HEADHOUSE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3307 AGRONOMY GREENHOUSE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3308 AGRONOMY GREENHOUSE #3 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3309 STORAGE BARN - SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3310 HORSE BARN C-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3311 HORSE BARN B-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3312 HAZARDOUS MTL STORAGE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3313 CONTENTS/SMALL ANIMAL HOSPITAL 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1

Page 241: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

241

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

3314 BARN C/SHED-MAINE CHANCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3315 TOBACCO BARN - SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3316 GARAGE-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3317 HOUSE-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3318 GARAGE-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3319 HOUSE-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3320 GARAGE-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3321 HOUSE-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3322 HOUSE-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3323 GARAGE-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3324 GARAGE-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3325 HOUSE-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3326 GARAGE-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3327 HOUSE-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3328 HORSE BARN - SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3329 CARRIAGE HOUSE-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3330 OLD SPINDLETOP SHOP/STRIP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3331 COTTAGE-POULTRY 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3332 COTTAGE-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1

Page 242: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

242

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

3333 COTTAGE-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3334 IMPLEMENT SHED-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3336 HORSE BARN-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3337 PUMP HOUSE - SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3338 ENTOMOLOGY DWELLING 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3339 DWELLING HOUSE-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3340 STORAGE BARN/SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3341 DWELLING HOUSE-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3342 FOUR-CAR GARAGE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3344 STORAGE BARN-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3345 HORSE BARN/SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3349 TURF CENTER-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3350 GOAT BARN-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3350A SILO - SPINDLETOP FARM 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3351 VACANT DOG KENNEL 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3352 VACANT DOG KENNEL 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3353 GROUNDS OFFICE-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3354 TENNIS PRO SHOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3355 TENNIS PRO SHOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1

Page 243: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

243

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

3356 DWELLING-VET SCIENCE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3357 GARAGE APARTMENTS 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3358 MANSION-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3359 DRESSING ROOMS 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3360 RECREATION BLDG 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3361 PLEASURE BARN-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3362 GREENHOUSE THRI 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3363 STORAGE BUILDING 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3364 SCALE HOUSE-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3365 STORAGE BLDG FOR 3362 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3366 STORAGE BUILDING 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3367 EQUIPMENT STORAGE BLDG 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3370 COUNCIL OF ST GOVT 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3372 BATH HOUSE - SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3373 TOBACCO BARN - SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3374 CROP DRYER BLDG 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3375 FIELD LAB-SPINDLETOP 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3376 CLIMATOLOGICAL LAB 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3377 AGRONOMY UNIT STORAGE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1

Page 244: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

244

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

3378 ANIMAL CARE BARN 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3379 FOUNDATN SEED PROC 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3380 AG ENGINEERING BARN 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3381 TOBACCO CURING SHED 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3382 CTR APP RES LAB-LEASED BY 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3383 CHEMICAL STORAGE BLDG 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3384 RESEARCH TOBACCO BARN 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3385 COUNCIL STATE GOVERNMENT (VET SCIENCE DWELLING) 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3387 AGRONOMY STORAGE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3388 AGRONOMY MACHINE STORAGE BUILDING 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3389 AGRONOMY GREENHOUSE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3390 AGRONOMY PESTICIDE STG 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3391 AGRONOMY FUEL STG SHED 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3392 AGRONOMY GREENHOUSE 2 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3393 MOBILE HOME 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3396 POLE SHED BALE STORAGE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3397 STORAGE BLDG 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3398 AGRONOMY STORAGE BUILDING 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3399 ENTOMOLOGY STORAGE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1

Page 245: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

245

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

3413 NEW IMPLEMENT SHED 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 3414 TOOL SHED 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 3422 FIELD RESEARCH LAB 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 3423 VET SC ISOLATION BLDG 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 3424 VET SC ISOLATION BLDG 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 3425 VET SC ISOLATION BLDG 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 3426 VET SC ISOLATION BLDG 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 3427 VET SC ISOLATION BLDG 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 3428 HAY & FEED STORAGE BLDG 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 3429 AUTOPSY LAB /L QTRS 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 3430 NURSERY GREENHOUSE 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 3431 HORT EQUIP STORAGE 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 3432 GREEN HOUSE-SOUTH FARM 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 3433 PESTICIDE STORAGE BLDG 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 3434 MANAGERS HOUSE-SOUTH FARM 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 3435 SOUTH FARM COOLER 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 3436 SOUTH FARM HEADHOUSE 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 3437 SOUTH FARM GREENHOUSE 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 3501 MILLER'S GREENHOUSE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1

Page 246: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

246

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

3502 SEED SHED / RESEARCH 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3503 AGRONOMY STORAGE 2 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3504 HOOP SHED 3 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3505 THE HEADHOUSE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3506 VET SCIENCE RUN IN SHED 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 3617 MYCOLOGY -POULTRY FARM 3 5 1 2 5 5 2 0 5 4 0 3 3720 TENANT HOUSE 1-WOODFORD 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3740 TENANT HOUSE 2-WOODFORD 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3741 TENANTS HOUSE 3-WOODFORD 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3742 FOALING BARN-WOODFORD CO 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3743 STONE HOUSE 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3780 CORN BARN-WOODFORD CO 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3781 TOBACCO BARN-1-WOODFORD 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3783 OLS UTILITY SHED-WOODFORD 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3784 SALES PAVILION-WOODFORD 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3786 TOBACCO BARN 2-WOODFORD 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3788 TOBACCO BARN 3-WOODFORD 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3789 TENANTS HOUSE 5-WOODFORD 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3790 TENANTS HOUSE 6-WOODFORD 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3

Page 247: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

247

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

3791 CATTLE/SHOP BARN SHED 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3792 TOBACCO BARN 4-WOODFORD 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3793 TOBACCO BARN 5-WOODFORD 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3794 STUCCO DUPLEX 2-WOODFORD 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3795 SWINE TANK CONTROL SHED 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3801 SHOP OFFICE TRAILER 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3850 SCALE SHED 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3851 GRAY BRICK HOUSE-WOODFORD 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3852 MANAGERS HOUSE-WOODFORD 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3858 YEARLING BARN 1-WOODFORD 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3860 YEARLING BARN 2-WOODFORD 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3864 WFC OFFICE 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3867 BEEF UNIT/INDIVID PEN FACILITY 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3871 BEEF UNIT/COMPOSTING SHED 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3872 BEEF UNIT MACH/LEAF STG 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3873 BEEF UNIT/SMALL PEN C12FA 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3874 BEEF UNIT/HEIFER DEVELOPMENT 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3875 ANIMAL HANDLING FACILITY 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3880 MAIN PEN FACILITY 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3

Page 248: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

248

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

3881 NUTRITION FEED CENTER 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3882 SHEEP UNIT/SERV COMPLEX 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3883 SLEEPING QUARTERS 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3890 SWINE UNIT/SERV & RECEIVING 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3891 SWINE UNIT/HEADQUARTERS 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3892 SWINE UNIT/NURSERY COMPLEX 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3893 SWINE UNIT/GROWER/FINISHER 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3894 SWINE UNIT/BOAR STUD 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3895 SWINE UNIT/FARROWING/BREED 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3896 STUDENT DORMITORY-TRAILER 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3897 STUDENT DORMITORY-TRAILER 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3898 STUDENT DORMITORY-TRAILER 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3899 WOODFORD FARM SHOP 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3900 SWINE TANK CONTROL SHED 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3901 HOOP SHED #1 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3902 HOOP SHED #2 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3903 HOOP STORAGE 2003 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 3904 HOOP STORAGE 4 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 4501 DINING HALL-N CENTRAL 4-H 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4

Page 249: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

249

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

4503 BATHHOUSE - N CENTRAL 4H 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4504 BATHHOUSE- N CENTRAL 4H 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4505 CABIN -N CENTRAL 4-H 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4506 CABIN -N CENTRAL 4-H CAMP 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4507 CABIN -N CENTRAL 4-H CAMP 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4508 CARETAKERS HOUSE-N CENTRL 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4509 CABIN -N CENTRAL 4-H 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4510 CABIN-N CENTRAL 4-H 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4511 CABIN -N CENTRAL 4-H CAMP 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4512 CABIN -N CENTRAL 4-H CAMP 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4513 CABIN -N CENTRAL 4-H CAMP 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4514 CABIN -N CENTRAL 4-H CAMP 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4515 CABIN -N CENTRAL 4-H 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4516 CABIN NORTH CENTRAL 4-H 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4517 CABIN-N CENTRAL 4-H CAMP 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4518 CABIN-N CENTRAL 4-H CAMP 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4519 CABIN-NORTHCENTRAL 4H 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4520 CABIN -N CENTRAL 4-H CAMP 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4521 CABIN-N CENTRAL 4-H CAMP 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4

Page 250: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

250

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

4522 CABIN-NORTH CENTRAL 4-H 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4523 CABIN-N CENTRAL 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4524 CABIN-N CENTRAL 4-H 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4525 CABIN-N CENTRAL 4-H CAMP 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4526 CABIN-NORTH CENTRAL 4-H 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4527 CABIN-N CENTRAL 4-H CAMP 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4529 SEWAGE PUMP SYSTEM- 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4531 CONFERENCE BUILDING 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4532 HEALTH & ADMIN BLDG 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4533 BIRD BLIND BLDG 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4534 RIFLE-RANGE SHELTER-N CTR 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4535 OUTPOST SHELTER #1 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4536 OUTPOST SHELTER #2 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4537 OUTPOST STORAGE BUILDING 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4538 BIRD BLIND BUILDING 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4539 LOG CABIN-MUSEUM 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4540 SHELTER PAVILION 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4541 FILTER HOUSE/FIXED EQUIP 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4 4542 SWIMMING POOL-N CENTRAL 5 5 1 2 4 3 2 0 3 3 2 4

Page 251: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

251

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

45616 ALL OTHER PROPERTY IN OPEN/MASONRY, METAL, NONCOMB 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1

45677 BILLBOARDS/SIGNS (NOT ON BUILDINGS) 2 1 1 0 4 3 4 0 4 2 1 2 45813 HILLTOP AVE./GATE ACCESS EQUIP 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 4601 MENS CABIN-FELTNER 4H 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4602 MENS CABIN-FELTNER 4H 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4603 MENS CABIN-FELTNER 4H 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4604 MENS CABIN-FELTNER 4H 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4605 BATH HOUSE BOYS-FELTNER 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1

46054 ALL OTHER PROPERTY IN OPEN/MASONRY, METAL, NONCOMB 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1

4606 DINING-FELTNER 4H 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4607 WOMENS CABIN-FELTNER 4H 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4608 WOMENS CABIN-FELTNER 4H 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4609 WOMENS CABIN-FELTNER 4H 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4610 WOMENS CABIN-FELTNER 4H 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4611 WOMENS CABIN-FELTNER 4H 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4612 WOMENS CABIN-FELTNER 4H 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4613 WOMENS CABIN-FELTNER 4H 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4614 WOMENS CABIN-FELTNER 4H 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1

Page 252: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

252

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

4615 BATH HOUSE GIRLS-FELTNER 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4617 CRAFTS BLDG-FELTNER 4H 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4618 RESIDENCE - FELTNER 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4619 STORAGE BLDG - FELTNER 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4620 STEEL SHELTER - FELTNER 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4621 GIRLS' CABIN-FELTNER 4H 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4622 SEWAGE PUMP SYSTEM-FELTNER 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4623 MOBILE HOME 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4624 BOYS CABIN-FELTNER 4-H 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4625 BOYS CABIN-FELTNER 4-H 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4626 GIRLS CABIN-FELTNER 4-H 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4628 AMPHITHEATER-FELTNER 4-H 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4629 COUNTRY STORE-FELTNER 4-H 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4630 STAFF CABIN-FELTNER 4-H 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4631 MAINTENANCE BLDG-FELTNER 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4632 BATH HOUSE SWIM POOL 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4633 GIRLS CABIN-FELTNER 4-H 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4634 SWIMMING POOL-FELTNER 4-H 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4635 SHELTER HOUSE-FELTNER 4-H 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1

Page 253: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

253

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

4636 LOG CABIN 2 STORY-FELTNER 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4638 RIFLE RANGE SHELTER 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4639 MOBILE HOME STAFF-FELTNER 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4640 9 METAL STORAGE BINS 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4641 BARBQUE SHELTER 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4642 BIRDHOUSE 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4643 BOAT DOCK 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4644 MOBILE HOME 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4645 MALE STAFF TRAILER 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4646 FISHING HUT 2 1 2 1 3 0 4 0 3 2 1 1 4702 TOBACCO BARN 1-EDEN SHALE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 4703 HOUSE HERDSMAN 2-EDEN SHALE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 4704 HEIFER BARN 3 -EDEN SHALE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 4705 SUPTS DWELLING-EDEN SHALE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 4706 DAIRY BARN 5-EDEN SHALE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 4707 COTTAGE DWELL 6-EDEN SHALE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 4708 TOBACCO BARN-EDEN SHALE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 4709 BULL BARN - EDEN SHALE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 4711 IMPLEMENT SHED/SHOP –EDEN SHALE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3

Page 254: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

254

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

4712 SHEEP BARN - EDEN SHALE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 4713 BARN - EDEN SHALE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 4714 4-BENT TOBACCO BARN -EDEN SHALE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 4715 5-BENT TOBACCO BARN –EDEN SHALE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 4716 5-BENT TOBACCO BARN –EDEN SHALE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 4717 DWELLING - EDEN SHALE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 4721 STORAGE SHED - EDEN SHALE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 4727 VETERINARY SCIENCE OFFICE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 4729 STRIPPING ROOM-EDEN SHALE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 4732 GARAGE/OFFICE -EDEN SHALE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 4733 DAIRY HEIFER BARN-EDEN SHALE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 4735 HORTICULTURE SHED – EDEN SHALE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 4736 CORN CRIB #1 - EDEN SHALE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 4737 CORN CRIB #2 - EDEN SHALE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 4738 GREENHOUSE/HAY STORAGE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 4739 GREENHOUSE FURNACE ROOM 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 4740 HOLDING & SCALE PEN –EDEN SHALE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 4740A GRAIN BIN - EDEN SHALE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 4741 CONCRETE STAVE SILO –EDEN SHALE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3

Page 255: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

255

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

4744 CORN CRIB #3 - EDEN SHALE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 4745 TOOL ROOM - EDEN SHALE 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 49610 BRIDGES/AQUEDUCTS 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 49829 BRIDGES/AQUEDUCTS 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 60072 SWINE TANK 1/VERSAILLES 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 60073 SWINE TANK 2/VERSAILLES 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 64604 #0570 SILVER LAKE SMALL HOUSE 2 4 2 1 4 3 1 0 1 4 0 4 64605 #0570A SILVER LAKE CABIN 2 4 2 1 4 3 1 0 1 4 0 4 64606 #0570B SILVER LAKE BARN 2 4 2 1 4 3 1 0 1 4 0 4 64727 VETERINARY SCIENCE OFFICE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 65355 HOOP SHED #3 HAY STORAGE 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 66606 SHIVELY OUTDOOR TRACK 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 66607 PARKING STRUCTURE #6 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 66608 UK RESIDENCE 413 PENNSYLVANIA 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 7700T COUNTRY STORE 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7701 DINING HALL/OFC/COOLER & 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7702 STORAGE SHED 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7703 STORAGE SHED 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7704 SHELTER HOUSE - W KY 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4

Page 256: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

256

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

7705 BOYS' BATH HOUSE-W KN 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7707 STORAGE SHED 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7708 STORAGE SHED 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7710 PAPER GOODS STG BLDG-W KY 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7711 PAPER GOODS STG-NEXT 7773 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7712 STORAGE BUILDING 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7713 CRAFT HOUSE 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7716 HOUSE - W KY 4-H CAMP 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7717 SHOP - W KY 4-H CAMP 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7718 GIRLS' BATH HOUSE - W KY 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7722 GARAGE /SHOP /PUMP BLDG 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7723 BOYS' COTTAGE - U KY 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7724 BOYS' COTTAGE - W KY 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7725 BOYS' COTTAGE - W KY 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7726 BOYS' COTTAGE - W KY 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7727 BOYS' COTTAGE - W KY 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7728 BOYS' COTTAGE - W KY 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7729 BOYS' COTTAGE - W KY 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7730 BOYS' COTTAGE - W KY 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4

Page 257: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

257

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

7731 BOYS' COTTAGE - W KY 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7732 BOYS' COTTAGE - W KY 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7733 BOYS COTTAGE 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7742 GIRLS' COTTAGE - W KY 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7743 PUMP HOUSE & PUMP - W KY 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7744 FILTER HOUSE & PUMP -W KY 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7745 GATE HOUSE-W KY 4-H CAMP 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7746 POOL BATH HOUSE -W KY 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7747 SAND FILTER(SEWAGE) 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7748 BOAT DOCK NEW 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7751 NATURE STUDY STORAGE 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7753 BOAT HOUSE-W KY 4-H CAMP 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7755 TWO MOBILE HOMES/ATTACHED 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7756 TRAILER 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7757 GIRLS' COTTAGE - W KY 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7758 GIRLS' COTTAGE - W KY 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7759 GIRLS' COTTAGE - W KY 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7760 GIRLS' COTTAGE - W KY 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7761 GIRLS' COTTAGE - W KY 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4

Page 258: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

258

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

7762 GIRLS' COTTAGE - W KY 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7763 GIRLS' COTTAGE - W KY 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7764 GIRLS' COTTAGE - W KY 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7765 GIRLS' COTTAGE - W KY 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7766 GIRLS' COTTAGE - W KY 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7767 BOYS COTTAGE 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7768 STAFF COTTAGE - W KY 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7769 SWIMMING POOL - W KY 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7770 FILTER HOUSE - W KY 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7771 STAFF CABIN - W KY 4-H 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7773 MULTIPURPOSE BLDG - W KY 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7774 RIFLE RANGE SHELTER-W KY 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7775 COUNTRY STORE 2 3 3 4 4 0 1 0 4 3 1 4 7801 SUPT'S DWELLING -W KY EXP 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7802 CARPENTER'S DWELLING-W KY 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7803 RESEARCH SPEC DWELL -W KY 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7804 FOREMAN'S DWELLING - W KY 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7805 ASST FOREMAN'S DWELL-W KY 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7806 EQUIP OPR DWELLING - W KY 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4

Page 259: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

259

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

7807 OFFICE & SERVICE BLDG 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7808 GREENHOUSE /HEADER HOUSE 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7809 TOBACCO BARN-W KY EXP STATION 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7810 TOBACCO BARN-W KY EXP STATION 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7811 DARK FIRED TOBACCO BARN-W 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7813 CHEM STORAGE BARN - W KY 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7814 FERT STORAGE BARN - W KY 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7815 HEIFER BARN -W KY EXP STATION 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7816 FEED PROCESSING CTR /BINS 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7817 FARROWING HOUSE #1 - W KY 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7818 FARROWING HOUSE #2 - W KY 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7819 SWINE TEST SHED SOUTH 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7820 SWINE TEST SHED NORTH 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7821 HORSE BARN /STORAGE SHED 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7822 BEEF CATTLE BARN - W KY 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7823 STEER FEEDING BARN - W KY 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7837 FARM SHOP - W KY EXP STATION 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7839 STORAGE BARN /PRUITT FARM 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7842 GARAGE-ASST.FOREMAN 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4

Page 260: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

260

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

7847 LONG SILO #2 - W KY EXP 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7848 MADISON SILO #1 -W KY EXP 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7851 FORAGE & GRAIN DRYER-W KY 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7853 GARAGE/EQ OPERATOR'S HSE- 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7854 GARAGE/CARPENTER'S HSE-W 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7855 GARAGE/RESEARCH SPEC - W 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7856 SUPT'S GARAGE - W KY EXP 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7858 RESEARCH & ED CTR - W KY 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7859 SAWDUST STORAGE BUILDING 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7860 GRAIN BIN/DRYER NORTH 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7861 GRAIN BIN/DRYER SOUTH 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7862 SILO NEAR #7814 -W KY EXP 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7864 OPEN EQUIP SHED -W KY 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7865 OPEN EQUIP SHED - W KY 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7866 CORN COB BIN/OPEN SHELTER 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7867 OPEN EQUIP SHED - W KY 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7868 DARK FIRED TOBACCO BARN 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7868A DARK FIRED TOBACCO BARN 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7869 DARK FIRED TOB. RES. 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4

Page 261: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

261

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

7870 PESTICIDE STG BLDG 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7871 GARAGE-ROYCE BURCHETT RES 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7872 EQUIPMENT SHED 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7873 MOBILE HOME 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7874 HANSEN SILO-WESTERN KY SU 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7875 GREENHOUSE DARK TOBACCO 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7876 EXCESS PROPERTY BUILDINGS 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7877 AG MACHINERY STG SHD 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 7878 7878 PUMP STATION/ PRINCETON, KY 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 8002 CONTENTS/KENTUCKY UTILITES BUILDING 2 5 2 2 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 8617 SWINE TANK CONTROL SHED 2 4 4 3 3 0 2 0 4 2 2 4 8633 SAMARITAN HOSPITAL 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 9001 DWELLING-ROBINSON SUB-STA 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9003 PERFORM TEST BARN-ROBINSN 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9004 COMM HALL & WHSE-ROBINSON 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9005 RESIDENCE A - ROBINSON 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9007 DWELLING - ROBINSON 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9008 DWELLING - ROBINSON 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9009 RESIDENCE B - ROBINSON 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2

Page 262: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

262

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

9010 AUDITORIUM - ROBINSON 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9011 POLE BARN - ROBINSON 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9012 RESIDENCE D - ROBINSON 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9016 RESIDENCE C /TWO-CAR GAR 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9023 ADMINISTRATION BLDG - ROB 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9033 TOBACCO BARN 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9034 AGRONOMY FIELD LAB 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9204 POLE SHED-WOOD UTILIZATN 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9205 WOOD UTILIZATION CENTER 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9206 DRY KILN/BOILER/FIX EQUIP 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9215 RESIDENT DORM-WOOD UTILIZ 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9302 DORM & CLASSROOMS-ROBINSN 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9303 CAMP RESIDENCE - ROBINSON 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9304 DORM - ROBINSON FOREST 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9305 FACULTY DORM - ROBINSON 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9306 KITCHEN/DINING HALL – ROBINSON 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9307 SAWMILL SHOP/GARAGE – ROBINSON 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9309 EQUIPMENT SHED – ROBINSON 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9311 EQUIPMENT SHED/SHOP - ROBINSON 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2

Page 263: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

263

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

9312 LG SAWMILL AT GREENHOUSE 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9314 PUMP HOUSE & EQUIP - ROBINSON 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9315 FIRE TOWER-ROBINSON 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9316 RESEARCH LAB - ROBINSON 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9317 SM SAWMILL & EQUIP - ROBINSON 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9318 CARETAKER'S RES-ROBINSON 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9319 SUPT'S RES - ROBINSON 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9321 BATHHOUSE-ROBINSON FOREST 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9322 GAS TANK SHELTER 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9323 BIRD BLIND 2 1 1 1 3 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 9400 MUHLENBERG CO EXTENSN OFC 1 2 3 2 1 0 1 2 2 1 1 3 9403 OHIO CO EXTENSION OFC 2 4 3 4 4 0 2 2 2 3 3 4 9406 OWSLEY CO EXTENSION OFC 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 1 9408 PERRY CO EXTENSION OFC 2 1 2 2 3 0 5 4 3 2 4 3 9409 PIKE CO EXTENSION OFC 2 1 1 2 2 0 4 0 3 2 1 4 9411 PULASKI CO EXTENSION OFC 2 1 1 0 4 3 4 0 5 3 2 3 9413 ROCKCASTLE CO EXTENSN OFC 3 2 2 0 4 3 5 0 3 4 4 2 9415 RUSSELL CO EXTENSION OFC 2 3 1 2 4 1 2 0 3 4 2 4 9420 TAYLOR CO EXTENSION OFC 3 3 1 2 5 2 2 0 5 4 2 4

Page 264: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

264

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

9422 TRIGG CO EXTENSION OFC 1 2 2 2 1 3 1 0 3 1 1 3 9425 WARREN CO EXTENSION OFC 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 0 2 1 0 2 9429 WAYNE CO EXTENSION OFC 2 1 1 0 2 4 4 0 3 2 1 2 9431 WHITLEY CO EXTENSION OFC 2 1 2 2 1 0 5 2 3 2 4 1 9432 WOLFE CO EXTENSION OFC 3 1 1 0 4 1 5 0 3 2 4 4 9433 WOODFORD CO EXTENSION OFC 2 5 1 0 5 5 2 0 2 3 0 3 9443 LEXINGTON MAIN HEALTH 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 9445 KY ENERGY CENTER - UK 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 0 3 2 1 1 9446 NATHANIEL MISSION 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 9468 LSD 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 9501 BOAT DOCK 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9502 DINING HALL/KITCHEN –LAKE CUMBERLAND 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9503 CHEROKEE CABIN #1 – LAKE CUMBERLAND 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9504 CROW CABIN #2 – LAKE CUMBERLAND 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9505 SHAWNEE CABIN #3 – LAKE CUMBERLAND 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9506 PAWNEE CABIN #4 – LAKE CUMBERLAND 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9507 MOHICA CABIN #5 – LAKE CUMBERLAND 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9508 CABIN #6 -LAKE CUMBERLAND 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9509 NAVAJO CABIN #7 – LAKE CUMBERLAND 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2

Page 265: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

265

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

9510 CHOCKTOW CABIN #8 – LAKE CUMBERLAND 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9511 SIOUX CABIN #9 – LAKE CUMBERLAND 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9512 OJIBWAY CABIN #10 - LAKE CUMBERLAND 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9513 COMMANCHE CABIN #11-LAKE CUMBERLAND 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9514 CABIN #12 - LAKE CUMBERLAND 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9515 APACHE CABIN #13 - LAKE CUMBERLAND 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9516 HEALTH CENTER - LAKE CUMBERLAND 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9520 BATH HOUSE - LAKE CUMBERLAND 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9521 LARGE SWIM POOL/INCL PUMP 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9525 CHAMPION MOBILE HOME 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9527 SHOP - LAKE CUMBERLAND 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9528 SHELTER HOUSE - LAKE CUMBERLAND 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9529 MOBILE HOME/CRAFTS - LAKE CUMBERLAND 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9530 PUEBLO CABIN #14 - LAKE CUMBERLAND 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9531 BLACKFOOT CABIN #15 -LAKE CUMBERLAND 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9532 COUNTRY STORE - LAKE CUMBERLAND 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9533 EMERGENCY STORM SHELTER#1 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9534 EMERGENCY STORM SHELTER#2 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9536 STG BLDG-TRASH HOUSE 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2

Page 266: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

266

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

9538 KY LEADERSHIP CENTER - UK 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9540 KLC DIRECTORS RESIDENCE 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9541 OPEN SHELTER AT RIFLE RNG 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9542 SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT #1 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9543 SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT #2 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9544 EXTRA TRAILER 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9545 STAGE AT AMPHITHEATER 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9546 STORAGE BARN 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9610 PUBLIC LIBRARY/UK PROJECT 2 4 3 2 4 5 2 0 5 2 0 4 9612 ADAIR CO EXTENSION OFC 3 3 1 0 5 4 2 0 4 4 3 4 9616 BARREN CO EXTENSION OFC 2 3 1 2 4 3 2 0 4 2 0 4 9618 BELL CO EXTENSION OFC 2 1 2 2 1 1 5 3 2 4 4 1 9621 BOYD CO EXTENSION OFC 2 1 2 2 3 0 4 0 3 3 1 4 9624 BREATHITT CO EXTENSN OFC 3 1 1 2 3 0 4 2 3 2 2 2 9628 CALDWELL CO EXTENSION OFC 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 3 4 9634 CASEY CO EXTENSION OFC 4 3 1 3 4 2 2 0 4 5 5 2 9635 FARM BUREAU BLDG-UK 1 2 2 2 2 3 1 0 3 1 0 2 9636 CLARK CO EXTENSION OFC 3 5 1 2 5 4 2 0 3 4 0 3 9637 CLAY CO EXTENSION OFC 4 2 3 2 2 0 5 2 2 5 5 2

Page 267: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

267

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

9638 CLINTON CO EXTENSION OFC 4 3 1 0 3 4 3 0 3 5 4 1 9640 CUMBERLAND CO EXTENSN OFC 2 3 1 0 4 1 3 0 3 5 4 4 9642 EDMONSON CO AG EXT OFFICE 2 3 2 2 3 3 2 0 2 3 2 1 9644 ESTILL CO EXTENSION OFC 2 1 1 0 2 1 2 0 2 3 3 1 9645 FAYETTE CO AG EXT OFFICE 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 9647 FLOYD CO EXTENSION OFC 2 1 1 3 1 0 5 3 2 2 3 1 9651 GARRARD CO EXTENSION OFC 4 4 2 0 4 1 1 0 3 2 1 2 9653 GRAVES CO EXTENSION OFC 2 4 4 3 3 0 2 0 4 2 2 4 9655 GREEN CO EXTENSION OFC 2 3 1 0 4 3 2 0 4 2 3 4 9657 HANCOCK CO EXTENSION OFC 4 5 2 4 3 0 2 0 2 5 2 5 9658 HARDIN CO EXTENSION OFC 2 2 1 1 4 4 1 0 3 3 0 4 9659 HARLAN CO EXTENSION OFC 1 1 3 1 2 0 3 2 1 1 2 3 9667 JEFFERSON CO EXTENSN OFC 1 1 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 2 9668 JESSAMINE CO EXTENSN OFC 2 4 1 1 4 4 1 0 2 3 0 2 9669 JOHNSON CO EXTENSION OFC 3 2 1 2 2 0 5 3 2 3 5 4 9671 KNOTT CO EXTENSION OFC 2 1 2 0 2 0 4 2 1 2 4 1 9672 KNOX CO EXTENSION OFC 1 1 1 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 2 1 9674 LAUREL CO EXTENSION OFC 2 1 1 1 3 0 1 0 3 2 0 1 9675 LAWRENCE CO EXTENSION OFC 4 2 3 2 3 0 5 0 3 3 5 4

Page 268: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

268

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

9676 LEE CO EXTENSION OFC 4 1 1 1 2 1 4 0 1 2 4 1 9677 LESLIE CO EXTENSIN OFC 2 1 3 2 4 0 5 3 2 2 4 1 9678 LETCHER CO EXTENSION OFC 5 2 2 2 3 2 5 4 3 4 5 5 9680 LINCOLN CO EXTENSION OFC 5 5 3 0 5 2 3 0 4 4 2 2 9682 LOGAN CO EXTENSION OFC 3 4 2 2 4 3 2 0 3 5 2 4 9683 LYON CO EXTENSION OFC 3 5 5 0 2 4 2 0 3 4 3 2 9684 MADISON CO EXTENSION OFC 3 5 1 0 5 0 2 0 4 3 2 3 9685 MAGOFFIN CO EXTENSION OFC 3 2 1 2 2 0 5 2 3 3 5 5 9687 MARSHALL CO EXTENSION OFC 2 4 5 4 4 0 2 0 4 2 0 4 9688 MARTIN CO EXTENSION OFC 5 2 1 2 3 0 5 2 4 3 5 5 9690 MCCRACKEN CO AG EXT OFFCE 2 4 5 4 4 0 2 0 5 5 2 4 9691 MC CREARY CO EXTENSN OFC 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 9692 MC LEAN CO EXTENSION OFC 3 3 4 4 2 0 3 1 2 4 1 4 9694 MENIFEE CO EXTENSION OFC 3 1 1 0 3 2 3 0 1 4 2 3 9696 METCALFE CO EXTENSION OFC 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 0 3 5 3 3 9697 MONROE CO EXTENSION OFC 2 2 1 0 4 2 2 0 1 2 4 4 9699 MORGAN CO EXTENSION OFC 2 1 1 3 1 0 5 0 3 2 3 4 9733 413 PENNSYLVANIA 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 9739 MAGOFFIN CO HIGH SCHOOL 3 2 1 2 2 0 5 2 3 3 5 5

Page 269: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

269

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

9780 MH/MR SERVICES 2 4 1 2 4 3 1 0 2 4 0 3 9801 TATES CREEK ELEMENTARY 2 4 2 0 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 9802 LEXINGTON CONTROL LIBRARY 2 5 2 2 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 9809 APPALACIAN REGIONAL HOSP 2 1 2 2 3 0 5 4 3 2 4 3 9822 WHITESBURG CTR/SOUTH-EAST 5 2 2 2 3 2 5 4 3 4 5 5 9823 CONTINUING PHARMACY EDU 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 9824 LEASED OFFICE SPACE-UK 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 9826 PATIENT ACCOUNTS - UK MED 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 9827 INFORMATION MGT. 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 9827 CONTENTS/2224 REGENCY RD. 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 9831 KY CANCER NETWORK 2 1 1 3 1 3 4 0 3 2 3 5 9833 LFUCG - FORENSIC CENTER 2 5 2 2 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 9834 HEALTH CARE COLLECTION 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 9838 RESIDENTIAL MEDICAL RESRH 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 9839 GORMAN EDUCATION CENTER 3 2 2 2 3 0 5 5 3 3 5 3 9842 OFFICES & LAB - UK MED 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 9843 CENTER FOR PREV RESEARCH 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 9844 KY CLINIC SOUTH 3 4 2 0 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 9847 CONTENTS/KY CLINIC NORTH 2 5 2 2 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3

Page 270: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

270

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

9849 MEDICAL CENTER-ACCOUNTING 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 9850 9850 KY CLINIC TRAILER NORTH 2 4 2 0 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 9852 SOUTH BROADWAY PLACE 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 9854 BLDG A 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 9855 OFFICES 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 9858 251 PRICE ROAD 2 4 2 0 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 9884 BOX 130-ROUTE 122 1 1 1 1 1 0 3 2 1 1 3 1 9894 CONTENTS/465 E HIGH ST. 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 9900 KSP CRIME LAB 2 4 1 2 4 3 1 0 2 4 0 3 9922 343 WALLER AVE-ST 300 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 9931 CONTENTS/1105 JULIANNA CT. 1 1 1 1 3 2 1 0 2 1 0 3 9933 CONTENTS/233-299 E MAIN ST. 2 1 1 3 1 3 4 0 3 2 3 5 9935 CONTENTS/CHAUVIN DR. 1 3 1 0 3 2 1 0 3 1 0 1 9941 CONTENTS/BLAZER PARKWAY 1 3 1 1 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 9949 CONTENTS/2050 VERSAILLES RD. 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 9950 TRAILER/MAINTENANCE RES 2 1 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 3 1 2 9951 CONTENTS/STATE ST. 2 2 1 2 4 3 1 0 3 2 0 3 9953 CONTENTS/HARRODSBURG RD. 2 4 2 0 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 9954 COTENTS/CROUNSE BLDG. 1 2 4 0 3 0 1 0 3 2 0 3

Page 271: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

271

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

9955 CONTENTS/ST. JOSEPH DR. 2 4 2 1 4 4 1 0 4 2 0 2 9956 CONTENTS/ST. JOSEPH EAST 1 3 1 1 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 9957 CONTENTS/CENTRALIZED LAB 2 4 1 2 4 3 1 0 2 4 0 3 9964 CONTENTS/REED HALL 4 2 1 3 2 0 5 0 3 5 3 5 9966 CONTENTS/LIBRARIES AND ARCHIVES 2 4 1 2 4 3 1 0 2 4 0 3 9968 CENTRAL BAPTIST HOSPITAL 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 9969 CONTENTS/E-TOWN ADMIN BLDG. 2 3 1 2 4 5 2 0 4 2 0 5 9970 CONTENTS/HENDERSON CC BLDG. 4 5 5 5 4 0 4 2 5 5 2 5 9972 CONTENTS/PRESTONSBURG CC 2 1 1 3 1 0 5 3 2 2 3 1 9973 CONTENTS/SOUTHEAST CC 3 1 2 1 3 1 4 2 1 2 2 4 9975 CONTENTS/PADUCAH CC 3 5 5 2 5 0 2 0 5 4 2 5 9977 CONTENTS/ASHLAND CC 2 1 3 4 3 0 5 0 3 2 2 5 9978 CONTENTS/206 1ST ST. 2 1 1 3 1 3 4 0 3 2 3 5 9986 ONE PLAZA EAST 1 3 1 1 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1 9987 STOR ALL MAN O WAR 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 9988 MCDOWELL CTR FOR BLIND 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 2 9992 CENTRAL BAPTIST C. 2 5 2 0 5 5 2 0 4 2 0 3 C0002 BLDG 9960 3 5 1 2 5 5 2 0 5 4 0 3 M0528 ENTRY WALL 1 3 2 0 3 3 1 0 3 1 0 1

Page 272: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

272

Build

ing

Num

ber

Build

ing

Nam

e

Dam

Sco

re

Drou

ght S

core

Earth

quak

e Sco

re

Floo

d Sc

ore

Hail S

core

Kars

t Sco

re

Land

slide

Sco

re

Mine

Sco

re

Seve

re S

torm

Sco

re

Torn

ado

Scor

e

Wild

fire S

core

Win

ter S

torm

Sco

re

Services 9999 UTILITY SERVICES - CHILLED WATER 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 Services 9999 UTILITY SERVICES - DOMESTIC WATER 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 Services 9999 UTILITY SERVICES - ELECTRICAL 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 Services 9999 UTILITY SERVICES - SANITARY SEWER 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 Services 9999 UTILITY SERVICES - STEAM 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 Services 9999 UTILITY SERVICES - STORM SEWER 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 Services 9999 UTILITY SERVICES - TELECOMMUNICATIONS 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 Services 9999 UTILITY SITE: NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTION 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 Site 9999 UTILITY SERVICES: PARKING LOTS 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 Site 9999 UTILITY SERVICES: ROADWAYS 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1 Site 9999 UTILITY SERVICES: SIDEWALKS 1 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 1

Page 273: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

273

Appendix 11: Facility Age Elements at Risk Rank Table

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

AGE

0032 MAIN ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 410 ADMINISTRATION DR 126 0033 EZRA GILLIS BUILDING 502 ADMINISTRATION DR 110 0035 MILLER HALL 504 ADMINISTRATION DR 110 0028 BARKER HALL / BUELL ARMORY 408 ADMINISTRATION DR 106 0009 PATTERSON HALL 120 KEENELAND DR 104 0031 FRAZEE HALL 406 ADMINISTRATION DR 101 0038 MINING LABORATORY 169 FUNKHOUSER DR 101 0064 SCOVELL HALL 670 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST 101 0047 CW MATHEWS BLDG 606 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST 100 0041 PENCE HALL 175 LIBRARY DR 99 0044 KASTLE HALL 171 FUNKHOUSER DR 98 0062 INSECTORY CONSERVATORY 146 WASHINGTON AVE 93 0062 INSECTORY CONSERVATORY 146 WASHINGTON AVE 93 0062 INSECTORY CONSERVATORY 146 WASHINGTON AVE 93 0040 MAXWELL PLACE 471 ROSE ST 91 0211 MAXWELL PLACE GARAGE 475 ROSE ST 91 0021 ENG RES/SCHOOL OF MUSIC 421 ROSE ST 89 0058 BRADLEY HALL 545 ROSE ST 87 0029 ALUMNI GYM 102 AVENUE OF CHAMPIONS 84 0008 BOYD HALL 124 KEENELAND DR 83 0060 RESEARCH & DEV CTR 149 WASHINGTON AV 81 0045 MC VEY HALL 165 FUNKHOUSER DR 80 0001 TAYLOR EDUCATION 597 S UPPER ST 79

Page 274: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

274

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

AGE

0049 MEMORIAL HALL - UK 610 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST 79 0056 BRECKINGRIDGE HALL 168 FUNKHOUSER DR 79 0057 KINKEAD HALL 172 FUNKHOUSER DR 79 0039 KING LIBRARY 179 FUNKHOUSER DR 78 0073 THOMAS POE COOPER BLDG 730 ROSE ST 78 0075 KELLY HALL 360 HUGUELET DR 77 0065 SMALL ANIMAL LAB 150 KY CLINIC DR 73 0088 AG MOTOR POOL 1505 COLLEGE WAY 73 0061 TOBACCO RESEARCH LAB 150 WASHINGTON AVE 72 0061 TOBACCO RESEARCH LAB 150 WASHINGTON AVE 72 0061 TOBACCO RESEARCH LAB 150 WASHINGTON AVE 72 0177 RESIDENCE MOTOR POOL 1505 COLLEGE WAY 72 0030 STUDENT CENTER 404 S. LIMESTONE ST 70 0004 CENTRAL HEATING PLANT #2 598 S UPPER ST 69 0007 JEWELL HALL 103 AVENUE OF CHAMPIONS 69 0024 LAFFERTY HALL 150 PATTERSON DR 69 0050 ERIKSON HALL 135 GRAHAM AVE 68 0054 FUNKHOUSER 160 FUNKHOUSER DR 68 0094 COOPER HOUSE 1312 NICHOLASVILLE RD 68 0070 WENNER-GREN RESEARCH LAB 600 ROSE ST 67 0010 HAMILTON HOUSE - UK 342 S LIMESTONE 65 0402 SCHOOL FOUR MUSIC AC OFC 111 WASHINGTON AVE 147 WASHINGTON AVE 65 0400 ELLEN H RICHARDS HS 630 MAXWELTON CT 63 0078 MEDICAL CENTER ANNEX #5 1096 VA DR 62 0401 WELDON HOUSE 635 MAXWELTON CT 62

Page 275: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

275

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

AGE

0002 SCOTT STREET BUILDING 110 SCOTT ST 61 0059 BOWMAN HALL 151 WASHINGTON AVE 61 0076 DIMMOCK ANIMAL PATHOLOGY 1095 VA DR 60 0097 ES GOOD BARN 1451 UNIVERSITY DR 60 0349 FACULTY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT 641 MAXWELTON CT 60 0022 FINE ARTS GUIGNOL 465 ROSE ST 59 0350 CENTER FOR DRUG & ALCOHOL RESEARCH 643 MAXWELTON CT 59 0005 FD PETERSON SERVICE BLDG 411 S LIMESTONE 58 0019 MEMORIAL COLISEUM 201 AVE OF CHAMPIONS 58 0066 AGRONOMY H HOUSE-G HOUSE 111 WASHINGTON AVE 152 KY CLINIC DR 58 0067 CHI OMEGA SORORITY - UK 456 ROSE ST 58 0069 ALPHA DELTA PI SORORITY 476 ROSE ST 58 0042 GREHAN JOURNALISM 167 FUNKHOUSER DR 57 0011 KEENELAND HALL 121 KEENELAND DR 54 0072 DONOVAN HALL 680 ROSE ST 54 0137 LAMDA CHI ALPHA FRATERNITY 419 HUGELET AVENUE 54 0138 PHI SIGMA KAPPA FRATERNITY 439 HUGELET AVE 54 0140 KAPPA SIGMA FRATERNITY 460 HILLTOP AVE 54 0142 FARMHOUSE FRATERNITY 420 HILLTOP AVE 54 0343 BINGHAM DAVIS HOUSE 218 E MAXWELL ST 54 0071 FOOD STORAGE K-LAIRL 318 HILLTOP AVE 53 0130 COOPERSTOWN BLDG A 700 WOODLAND AVE 52 0131 COOPERSTOWN BLDG B 700 WOODLAND AVE 52 0132 COOPERSTOWN BLDG C 700 WOODLAND AVE 52 0133 COOPERSTOWN BLDG D 700 WOODLAND AVE 52

Page 276: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

276

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

AGE

0134 COOPERSTOWN APT E 700 WOODLAND AVE 52 0135 COOPERSTOWN BLDG F 700 WOODLAND AVE 52 0136 COOPERSTOWN APT G 700 WOODLAND AVE 52 0053 SLONE RESEARCH BLDG 111 WASHINGTON AVE 121 WASHINGTON AVE 51 0068 DELTA DELTA DELTA SORORITY 468 ROSE ST 51 0351 JEFF HARRIS PSYCH SER CTR 644 MAXWELTON CT 51 0006 HOLMES HALL 101 AVENUE OF CHAMPIONS 50 0124 DELTA ZETA SORORITY 319 COLUMBIA TER 50 0125 KAPPA ALPHA THETA SORORITY 329 COLUMBIA TER 50 0126 PHI DELTA THETA FRATERNITY 327 COLUMBIA TER 50 0127 ALPHA GAMMA DELTA SORORITY 325 COLUMBIA TER 50 0128 KAPPA DELTA SORORITY 323 COLUMBIA TER 50 0129 SIGMA KAPPA SORORITY 321 COLUMBIA TER 50 0301 RENTAL PROPERTIES 154 BONNIE BRAE DR 50 0344 RAY F BETTS HOUSE 232 E MAXWELL ST 50 0353 OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 520 OLDHAM CT 50 0189 SHAWNEETOWN A 1608 UNIVERSITY CT 49 0190 SHAWNEETOWN B 1608 UNIVERSITY CT 49 0191 SHAWNEETOWN D 1608 UNIVERSITY CT 49 0192 SHAWNEETOWN F 1608 UNIVERSITY CT 49 0193 SHAWNEETOWN E 1608 UNIVERSITY CT 49 0194 SHAWNEETOWN C 1608 UNIVERSITY CT 49 0085 MED CTR HEATING-COOLING 151 HOSPITAL DR 48 0111 HAGGIN HALL 330 HILLTOP AVE 47 0111 HAGGIN HALL 330 HILLTOP AVE 47

Page 277: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

277

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

AGE

0112 ALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY 341 HILLTOP AVE 47 0113 SHIVELY SPORTS CENTER 712 SPORTS CENTER DR 47 0183 ISOLATION BARN 1529 COLLEGE WAY 47 0289 HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE 475 STADIUM VIEW DR 47 0333 APPLACHIAN CENTER ANNEX 641 SOUTH LIMESTONE 47 0012 BLAZER HALL 343 MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD. 46 0023 SAFETY & SECURITY 305 E EUCLID AVE 46 0101 REYNOLDS WAREHOUSE #1 349 SCOTT AVE 46 0102 REYNOLDS WAREHOUSE #2 351 SCOTT AVE 46 0293 UK HOSPITAL 800 ROSE ST 46 0297 DENTAL 800 ROSE ST 46 0298 MEDICAL SCIENCE 800 ROSE ST 46 0055 CHEMISTRY-PHYSICS 505 ROSE ST 45 0103 REYNOLDS WAREHOUSE #3 347 SCOTT AVE 45 0115 ALPHA GAMMA RHO FRATERNITY 701 WOODLAND AVE 45 0210 REYNOLDS WAREHOUSE #4 355 SCOTT AVE 45 0017 DICKEY HALL 251 SCOTT STREET 44 0091 AG SCIENCE CENTER & AUD 1100 NICHOLASVILLE RD 44 0092 SEED HOUSE 150 HOSPITAL DR 44 0119 ALUMNI BLDG 400 ROSE ST 44 0122 DELTA GAMMA SORORITY 450 PENNSYLVANIA AVE 44 0154 SCIENCE BLDG 411 STADIUM VIEW DR 44 0155 GREENHOUSE #2 150 HOSPITAL DR 44 0156 GREENHOUSE #4 150 HOSPITAL DR 44 0157 GREENHOUSE #7 150 HOSPITAL DR 44

Page 278: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

278

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

AGE

0158 GREENHOUSE #5 150 HOSPITAL DR 44 0159 GREENHOUSE #3 150 HOSPITAL DR 44 0160 GREENHOUSE #1 150 HOSPITAL DR 44 0034 BUSINESS ECON BLDG 550 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST 43 0121 SIGMA NU - UK 422 ROSE LN 43 0182 ISOLATION BARN/INCINERATOR 1525 COLLEGE WAY 43 0361 RESIDENCE-UK 402 PENNSYLVANIA CT 43 0046 ANDERSON HALL-TOWER 512 ADMINISTRATION DR 42 0048 LAW BUILDING 620 S LIMESTONE ST 42 0322 417 COLUMBIA AVE 42 0362 RESIDENCE-UK 405 PENNSYLVANIA CT 42 0089 COOLING PLANT #1 195 HOSPITAL DR 41 0143 DORM COMPLEX LR-7B2 (BLANDING 2) 763 WOODLAND AVE 41 0144 DORM COMPLEX LR-6B3 (BLANDING 3) 765 WOODLAND AVE 41 0145 D COMPLEX-BLANDING (BLANDING TOWER) 769 WOODLAND AVE 41 0146 DORM COMPLEX 5B4 (BLANDING 4) 767 WOODLAND AVE 41 0147 DORM COMPLEX CENTRAL FAC 770 WOODLAND AVE 41 0148 DORM COMPLEX 4K4 756 WOODLAND AVE 41 0149 DORM COMPLEX KIRWAN 758 WOODLAND AVE 41 0150 DORM COMPLEX LR 3K 754 WOODLAND AVE 41 0151 DORM COMPLEX LR 2K2 752 WOODLAND AVE 41 0152 DORM COMPLEX LR 1K1 750 WOODLAND AVE 41 0153 DORM COMPLEX LR8B1 (BLANDING 1) 761 WOODLAND AVE 41 0363 RESIDENCE-UK 406 PENNSYLVANIA CT 41 0209 CENTRIFUGE BUILDING 310 HILLTOP AVE 40

Page 279: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

279

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

AGE

0417 LEARNING SERVICES CENTER 660 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST 40 0003 RESEARCH FACILITY #1 111 WASHINGTON AVE 150 HOSPITAL DR 39 0052 CIVIL ENGINEERING 140 GRAHAM AVE 39 0197 PARKING STRUCTURE #1 1290 TOBACCO ROAD 39 0198 PARKING STRUCTURE #2 538 ROSE ST. 39 0204 COOLING PLANT #2 591 S UPPER ST 39 0204 COOLING PLANT #2 591 S UPPER ST 39 0025 WHITE HALL CLASSROOM BLDG 140 PATTERSON DR 38 0027 PATTERSON OFFICE TOWER 120 PATTERSON DR 38 0207 METAL ARTS BUILDING 357 SCOTT AVE 38 0432 COMMONWEALTH HOUSE 226 E MAXWELL ST 38 0214 FLAMMABLE STORAGE BLDG 148 GRAHAM AVE 37 0442 LIGON HOUSE 658 SOUTH LLIMESTONE STREET 37 0216 MULTI-DISC RESEARCH FACILITY 700 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST 36 0216 MULTI-DISC RESEARCH FACILITY 700 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST 36 0219 SEATON HPER BLDG 1210 UNIVERSITY DR 36 0231 FARM MAINT STORAGE SHED 1521 COLLEGE WAY 36 0215 GARRIGUS BLDG 325 COOPER DR 35 0161 GREENHOUSE #9 150 HOSPITAL DR 34 0162 GREENHOUSE #11 560 WILDCAT CT 150 HOSPITAL DR 34 0185 CARPORT FOR BLDG. 177 1505 COLLEGE WAY 34 0222 COMMONWEALTH STADIUM 1540 UNIVERSITY DR. 34 0224 MI KING LIBRARY ANNEX 179 FUNKHOUSER DR 34 0225 TH MORGAN BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE 675 ROSE ST 33 0227 RECREATION EQ BLDG 454 COMPLEX DR 32

Page 280: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

280

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

AGE

0105 COMMONWEALTH VILLAGE #2 1435 NICHOLASVILLE RD 31 0106 COMMONWEALTH VILLAGE 1435 NICHOLASVILLE RD 31 0163 GREENHOUSE #6 150 HOSPITAL DR 31 0229 AGR DISTRIBUTION CENTER 412 STADIUM VIEW DR 31 0235 J. OSWALD BLDG. 470 COOPER DR. 31 0236 TOBACCO & HEALTH 1401 UNIVERSITY DR 31 0237 WENNER-GREN RSCH ADDITION 172 ROSE ST 31 0238 APARTMENTS/16 UNITS - UK 404 LINDEN WALK 31 0240 APARTMENTS/10 UNITS-UK 468 ROSE LN 31 0242 WILDCAT LODGE 347 LEXINGTON AVE 31 0272 INFORMATION BUILDING 1540 UNIVERSITY DRIVE 30 0230 SANDERS BROWN 800 S LIMESTONE ST 29 0232 NURSING 751 ROSE ST 29 0241 SINGLETARY CENTER 405 ROSE ST 29 0110 MAINTENANCE BLDG-ATHLETIC 700 SPORTS CENTER DR 28 0243 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 1 300 ALUMNI DR 28 0244 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 2 300 ALUMNI DR 28 0245 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 3 300 ALUMNI DR 28 0246 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 4 300 ALUMNI DR 28 0247 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 5 300 ALUMNI DR 28 0248 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 6 300 ALUMNI DR 28 0249 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 7 300 ALUMNI DR 28 0250 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 8 300 ALUMNI DR 28 0251 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 9 300 ALUMNI DR 28 0252 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 10 300 ALUMNI DR 28

Page 281: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

281

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

AGE

0253 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 11 300 ALUMNI DR 28 0254 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 12 300 ALUMNI DR 28 0255 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 13 300 ALUMNI DR 28 0256 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 14 300 ALUMNI DR 28 0257 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 15 300 ALUMNI DR 28 0258 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 16 300 ALUMNI DR 28 0259 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 17 300 ALUMNI DR 28 0260 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 18 300 ALUMNI DR 28 0261 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 19 300 ALUMNI DR 28 0262 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 20 300 ALUMNI DR 28 0263 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 21 300 ALUMNI DR 28 0264 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 22 300 ALUMNI DR 28 0265 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 23 300 ALUMNI DR 28 0266 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 24 300 ALUMNI DR 28 0267 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 25 300 ALUMNI DR 28 0268 FOOD STORE LAUNDRY 300 ALUMNI DR STE 213 28 0314 RENTAL PROPERTIES 252 E MAXWELL ST 28 0020 GARAGE ENG TRANSPORTATION 533 S LIMESTONE 27 0043 SJ SAM WHALEN BLDG 533 S LIMESTONE 27 0087 MED CENTER STORAGE FACILITY 1530 STADIUM VIEW 27 0347 OFFICES 624 MAXWELTON CT 27 0015 STURGILL DEVELOPMENT BLDG 450 ROSE ST 26 0026 STUDENT CENTER ADDITION 200 AVENUE OF CHAMPIONS 26 0086 COLLEGE OF MEDICINE 1100 VA DR 26 0114 TRACK STORAGE BLDG 698 SPORTS CENTER DR 26

Page 282: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

282

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

AGE

0223 UNIV MEDICAL PLAZA 745 ROSE ST 26 0184 AG MACHINERY RESEARCH LAB 411 STADIUM VIEW DR 25 0199 PARKING STRUCTURE #3 140 KY CLINIC DR 25 0082 COLLEGE OF PHARMACY 725 ROSE ST 23 0014 BOONE FACULTY CENTER 500 ROSE ST 22 0093 ROACH BEN CANCER BLDG 750 ROSE ST 22 0099 GLUCK EQUINE BLDG 1400 NICHOLASVILLE RD 22 0213 BOONE TENNIS COMPLEX 454 COMPLEX DR 22 0336 THOMAS D CLARK BLDG 663 S LIMESTONE 22 0337 5-CAR GARAGE 663 S LIMESTONE 22 0096 COMBS CANCER RESEARCH 744 ROSE ST 21 0107 MINING/MINERALS BLDG 504 ROSE ST 21 0269 COMMUNICATIONS BUILDING 301 ROSE ST 21 0277 NUTTER FOOTBALL BLDG 720 SPORTS CENTER DR 21 0278 PPD STORAGE BLDG 425 STADIUM VIEW DR 21 0274 MOLONEY BLDG 450 COOPER DR. 20 0279 MAT STORAGE BLDG 460 STADIUM VIEW DR 20 0460 CENTER ON DRUG & ALCOHOL RESEARCH 149 TRANSCRIPT AVE 20 0051 MINERAL INDUSTRIES BLDG 120 GRAHAM AVE 19 0108 ROBOTICS FACILITY 143 GRAHAM AVE 19 0212 LANCASTER AQUATIC CENTER 416 COMPLEX DR 19 0275 POUNDSTONE REG SERVICES 1600 UNIVERSITY CT 19 0276 AG ENGINEERING BUILDING 1398 NICHOLASVILLE RD 19 0381 3-UNIT APT BUILDING 162-164 GAZETTE AVE 19 0386 150 GAZETTE AVENUE 150 GAZETTE AVE 19

Page 283: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

283

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

AGE

0461 UK MED CTR 153 TRANSCRIPT AVE 19 0467 220 TRANSCRIPT AVE 220 TRANSCRIPT AVE 19 0282 GAS STORAGE BLDG M & M 540 ROSE ST 18 0283 HAGAN BASEBALL STADIUM 700 SPORTS CENTER DR 18 0283 HAGAN BASEBALL STADIUM 700 SPORTS CENTER DR 18 0283 HAGAN BASEBALL STADIUM 700 SPORTS CENTER DR 18 0365 RESIDENCE W/DETCH GARAGE 410 PENNSYLVANIA CT 18

0098 MRISC /WOMEN'S CANCER FACILITY (EXT TO 0099) 740 ROSE ST 17

0118 FRATERNITIES HOUSE STG 460 HILLTOP AVE 16 0284 KENTUCKY CLINIC 750 S LIMESTONE ST 16 0287 ELECTRIC HVAC BLDG 425 STADIUM VIEW DR 16 0285 NUTTER FIELD HOUSE 1401 SPORTS CENTER DR 15 0288 GREENHOUSE & LAB 455 STADIUM VIEW DR 15 0300 ARBORETUM TOOL SHED 500 ARBORETUM WAY 15 0481 LCC ACADEMIC/TECH 470 COOPER DR 15 0281 OLIVER H RAYMOND CENTER 508 ADMINISTRATION DR 14 0305 HEALTH SCIENCE RESEARCH 1095 VA DR 14 0315 HUMANITIES COUNSEL 206 E MAXWELL ST 14 0473 RESIDENCE 505 OLDHAM CT 13 0286 ASTECC 145 GRAHAM AVE 12 0346 RESIDENCE - UK 654 MAXWELTON CT 12 0377 STUDENT HOUSING - UK 319 ROSE LN 12 0378 STUDENT HOUSING - UK 321 ROSE LN 12 0428 2 RENTAL UNITS - UK 457 WOODLAND AVE 12

Page 284: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

284

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

AGE

0202 PARKING STRUCTURE #5 409 S LIMESTONE 11 0450 SOFTBALL MAINTENANCE 560 WILDCAT CT 11 0451 SOCCERFIELD COMPLEX 550 WILDCAT CT 11 0451 SOCCERFIELD COMPLEX 550 WILDCAT CT 11 0452 SOFTBALL COMPLEX 570 WILDCAT CT 11 0487 UK-RENTAL PROPERTY 518 OLDHAM CT 11 0490 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MGT 355 COOPER DR 11 0412 403 PENNSYLVANIA CT 403 PENNSYLVANIA CT 10 0453 SHIVELY GROUNDS BLDG 712 SPORTS CENTER DR 10 0456 WT YOUNG LIBRARY 401 HILLTOP AVE 10 0413 LOCKER/SHOWER/RESTROOM-UK 560 WILDCAT CT 570 WILDCAT CT 9 0420 CHILD DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH CENTER 424 EUCLID AVE 9 0433 SCHMIDT VOCAL ARTS 412-414 ROSE STREET 9 0482 RESIDENCE-UK 408 LINDEN WALK 9 0489 MEDICAL CENTER OFFICE 1117 S LIMESTONE 9 0507 SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON 410 ROSE LN 9 0164 HORTICULTURE GREENHOUSE 150 HOSPITAL DR 8 0345 MAX KADE GERMAN HOUSE 212 E MAXWELL ST 8 0494 JAMES W STUCKERT CAREER 408 ROSE ST 8 0495 JAMES F HARDYMAN BUILDING 301 ROSE ST 8

0506 ROBERT STRAUS BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH BUILDING 515 OLDHAM CT 8

0510 456 ROSE LANE - RENTAL 456 ROSE LN 8 0511 RENTAL/DWELLING 456 ROSE LN 8 0449 SHIVELY GROUNDS STORAGE BLDG 712 SPORTS CENTER DR 7

Page 285: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

285

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

AGE

0200 CHARLES T. WETHINGTON JR. BUILDING 900 S. LIMESTONE 6 0302 DORTHA SMITH OATTS VISITOR CENTER 500 ALUMNI DR. 6 0312 PLANT SCIENCE BUILDING 1405 VETERAN AVE. 6 0484 518 OLDHAM CT. GARAGE 518 OLDHAM CT 6

0503 RALPH G ANDERSON BUILDING RALPH G ANDERSON BUILDING 506 ADMINISTRATION DR. 6

0504 SIGMA CHI FRATERNITY 447 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE 6 0505 SIGMA PHI EPSILON 441 PENNSYLVANIA AVE 6 0564 IRIS PROJECT BUILDING 630 SOUTH BROADWAY 5 8633 SAMARITAN HOSPITAL 310 SOUTH LIMESTONE 5 0509 BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH FACILTIY 741 SOUTH LIMESTONE 4 0517 MERSACK / LEAVELL BLDG. 807 S. LIMESTONE ST 4 0565 JOHN T. SMITH HALL 740 WOODLAND AVENUE 3 0566 BALDWIN HALL 701 SPORTS CENTER DRIVE 3 0567 INGELS HALL 705 SPORTS CENTER DRIVE 3 0568 NORTH DORM 125 AVENUE OF CHAMPIONS 3 0585 BASEBALL TRAINING PAVILLION 702 SPORTS CENTER DR 3 0571 PARKING STRUCTURE #6 721 PRESS AVE 2 0572 PARKING STRUCTURE #7 721 SPORTS CENTER DRIVE 2 0600 ELIZABETHTOWN CC LIBRARY 600 COLLEGE STREET RD 2 0604 JOE CRAFT CENTER 338 LEXINGTON AVE. 2

0220 BERNARD JOHNSON STUDENT RECREATION CENTER 434 COMPLEX DRIVE 0

0294 GILL HEART INSTITUTE 800 ROSE STREET 0 0348 RESIDENCE-UK 626 MAXWELTON CT 0

Page 286: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

286

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

AGE

0485 BOONE TENNIS STADIUM 725 SPORTS CENTER DR 0 0514 CENTRAL UTILITIES PLANT 761 PRESS AVENUE CENTRAL UTILITIES PLANT 0 0514 CENTRAL UTILITIES PLANT 761 PRESS AVENUE CENTRAL UTILITIES PLANT 0

0518 BBRSB GENERATOR BUILDING 751 PRESS AVENUE BBRSB GENERATOR BUILDING 0

0582 UNIVERSITY HEALTH SERVICES 830 S. LIMESTONE ST 0 0601 PARKING STRUCTURE #8 110 TRANSCRIPT 0 0611 SAMARITAN MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING 125 E. MAXWELL 0 0612 SAMARITAN CHILLER BUILDING 320 S. LIMESTONE ST 0 0613 SAMARITAN PARKING STRUCTURE 330 S. LIMESTONE ST 0 0614 123 WARREN COURT 123 WARREN CT 0 0615 125 WARREN COURT 125 WARREN CT 0 0616 SEATON CENTER STORAGE 1214 UNIVERSITY DR 0

Page 287: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

287

Appendix 12: Facility Population Estimate Elements at Risk Rank Table

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

POPU

LATI

ON E

STIM

ATE

0293 UK HOSPITAL 800 ROSE ST 2606 0027 PATTERSON OFFICE TOWER 120 PATTERSON DR 1230 0091 AG SCIENCE CENTER & AUD 1100 NICHOLASVILLE RD 1143 0064 SCOVELL HALL 670 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST 1126 0284 KENTUCKY CLINIC 750 S LIMESTONE ST 1119 0298 MEDICAL SCIENCE 800 ROSE ST 1089 0054 FUNKHOUSER 160 FUNKHOUSER DR 903 0055 CHEMISTRY-PHYSICS 505 ROSE ST 860 0005 FD PETERSON SERVICE BLDG 411 S LIMESTONE 723 0022 FINE ARTS GUIGNOL 465 ROSE ST 689 0019 MEMORIAL COLISEUM 201 AVE OF CHAMPIONS 647 0145 D COMPLEX-BLANDING (BLANDING TOWER) 769 WOODLAND AVE 610 0149 DORM COMPLEX KIRWAN 758 WOODLAND AVE 610 0111 HAGGIN HALL 330 HILLTOP AVE 557 0111 HAGGIN HALL 330 HILLTOP AVE 557 0232 NURSING 751 ROSE ST 448 0072 DONOVAN HALL 680 ROSE ST 352 0046 ANDERSON HALL-TOWER 512 ADMINISTRATION DR 338 0225 TH MORGAN BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE 675 ROSE ST 335 0082 COLLEGE OF PHARMACY 725 ROSE ST 323 0297 DENTAL 800 ROSE ST 316

Page 288: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

288

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

POPU

LATI

ON E

STIM

ATE

0200 CHARLES T. WETHINGTON JR. BUILDING 900 S. LIMESTONE 309 0011 KEENELAND HALL 121 KEENELAND DR 306 0006 HOLMES HALL 101 AVENUE OF CHAMPIONS 305 0001 TAYLOR EDUCATION 597 S UPPER ST 240 0025 WHITE HALL CLASSROOM BLDG 140 PATTERSON DR 233 0276 AG ENGINEERING BUILDING 1398 NICHOLASVILLE RD 230

0503 RALPH G ANDERSON BUILDING RALPH G ANDERSON BUILDING 506 ADMINISTRATION DR. 226

0456 WT YOUNG LIBRARY 401 HILLTOP AVE 214 0215 GARRIGUS BLDG 325 COOPER DR 210 0012 BLAZER HALL 343 MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD. 200 0045 MC VEY HALL 165 FUNKHOUSER DR 189 0509 BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH FACILTIY 741 SOUTH LIMESTONE 181 0101 REYNOLDS WAREHOUSE #1 349 SCOTT AVE 180 0017 DICKEY HALL 251 SCOTT STREET 178 0034 BUSINESS ECON BLDG 550 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST 175 0565 JOHN T. SMITH HALL 740 WOODLAND AVENUE 175 0566 BALDWIN HALL 701 SPORTS CENTER DRIVE 174 0003 RESEARCH FACILITY #1 111 WASHINGTON AVE 150 HOSPITAL DR 173 0567 INGELS HALL 705 SPORTS CENTER DRIVE 172 0143 DORM COMPLEX LR-7B2 (BLANDING 2) 763 WOODLAND AVE 167 0146 DORM COMPLEX 5B4 (BLANDING 4) 767 WOODLAND AVE 167 0148 DORM COMPLEX 4K4 756 WOODLAND AVE 167 0150 DORM COMPLEX LR 3K 754 WOODLAND AVE 167

Page 289: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

289

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

POPU

LATI

ON E

STIM

ATE

0152 DORM COMPLEX LR 1K1 750 WOODLAND AVE 167 0153 DORM COMPLEX LR8B1 (BLANDING 1) 761 WOODLAND AVE 167 0093 ROACH BEN CANCER BLDG 750 ROSE ST 165 0144 DORM COMPLEX LR-6B3 (BLANDING 3) 765 WOODLAND AVE 165 0151 DORM COMPLEX LR 2K2 752 WOODLAND AVE 165 0219 SEATON HPER BLDG 1210 UNIVERSITY DR 163 0075 KELLY HALL 360 HUGUELET DR 162 0108 ROBOTICS FACILITY 143 GRAHAM AVE 157 0294 GILL HEART INSTITUTE 800 ROSE STREET 147 0033 EZRA GILLIS BUILDING 502 ADMINISTRATION DR 140 0008 BOYD HALL 124 KEENELAND DR 137 0009 PATTERSON HALL 120 KEENELAND DR 136 0042 GREHAN JOURNALISM 167 FUNKHOUSER DR 129 0107 MINING/MINERALS BLDG 504 ROSE ST 129 0281 OLIVER H RAYMOND CENTER 508 ADMINISTRATION DR 127 0147 DORM COMPLEX CENTRAL FACILITY 770 WOODLAND AVE 126 0305 HEALTH SCIENCE RESEARCH 1095 VA DR 119 0030 STUDENT CENTER 404 S. LIMESTONE ST 118 0050 ERIKSON HALL 135 GRAHAM AVE 116 0007 JEWELL HALL 103 AVENUE OF CHAMPIONS 108 0224 MI KING LIBRARY ANNEX 179 FUNKHOUSER DR 102 0312 PLANT SCIENCE BUILDING 1405 VETERAN AVE. 101 0517 MERSACK / LEAVELL BLDG. 807 S. LIMESTONE ST 101 0098 MRISC /WOMEN'S CANCER FACILITY (EXT TO 740 ROSE ST 97

Page 290: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

290

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

POPU

LATI

ON E

STIM

ATE

0099) 0132 COOPERSTOWN BLDG C 700 WOODLAND AVE 89 0044 KASTLE HALL 171 FUNKHOUSER DR 80 0039 KING LIBRARY 179 FUNKHOUSER DR 79 0481 LCC ACADEMIC/TECH 470 COOPER DR 78 0023 SAFETY & SECURITY 305 E EUCLID AVE 77 0048 LAW BUILDING 620 S LIMESTONE ST 77 0134 COOPERSTOWN APT E 700 WOODLAND AVE 77 0130 COOPERSTOWN BLDG A 700 WOODLAND AVE 76 0135 COOPERSTOWN BLDG F 700 WOODLAND AVE 76 0015 STURGILL DEVELOPMENT BLDG 450 ROSE ST 75 0131 COOPERSTOWN BLDG B 700 WOODLAND AVE 75 0133 COOPERSTOWN BLDG D 700 WOODLAND AVE 75 0136 COOPERSTOWN APT G 700 WOODLAND AVE 75 8633 SAMARITAN HOSPITAL 310 SOUTH LIMESTONE 69 0230 SANDERS BROWN 800 S LIMESTONE ST 66 0057 KINKEAD HALL 172 FUNKHOUSER DR 65 0059 BOWMAN HALL 151 WASHINGTON AVE 65 0241 SINGLETARY CENTER 405 ROSE ST 64 0604 JOE CRAFT CENTER 338 LEXINGTON AVE. 64 0053 SLONE RESEARCH BLDG 111 WASHINGTON AVE 121 WASHINGTON AVE 63 0564 IRIS PROJECT BUILDING 630 SOUTH BROADWAY 62 0051 MINERAL INDUSTRIES BLDG 120 GRAHAM AVE 59 0198 PARKING STRUCTURE #2 538 ROSE ST. 59

Page 291: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

291

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

POPU

LATI

ON E

STIM

ATE

0032 MAIN ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 410 ADMINISTRATION DR 55 0495 JAMES F HARDYMAN BUILDING 301 ROSE ST 54 0105 COMMONWEALTH VILLAGE #2 1435 NICHOLASVILLE RD 53 0106 COMMONWEALTH VILLAGE 1435 NICHOLASVILLE RD 53 0507 SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON 410 ROSE LN 53 0086 COLLEGE OF MEDICINE OFC 1100 VA DR 52 0038 MINING LABORATORY 169 FUNKHOUSER DR 50 0275 POUNDSTONE REG SERVICES 1600 UNIVERSITY CT 50 0041 PENCE HALL 175 LIBRARY DR 45 0099 GLUCK EQUINE BLDG 1400 NICHOLASVILLE RD 45 0571 PARKING STRUCTURE #6 721 PRESS AVE 45 0126 PHI DELTA THETA FRATERNITY 327 COLUMBIA TER 43 0494 JAMES W STUCKERT CAREER 408 ROSE ST 43 0129 SIGMA KAPPA SORORITY 321 COLUMBIA TER 42 0058 BRADLEY HALL 545 ROSE ST 39 0096 COMBS CANCER RESEARCH 744 ROSE ST 39 0190 SHAWNEETOWN B 1608 UNIVERSITY CT 38 0189 SHAWNEETOWN A 1608 UNIVERSITY CT 37 0191 SHAWNEETOWN D 1608 UNIVERSITY CT 37 0192 SHAWNEETOWN F 1608 UNIVERSITY CT 37 0193 SHAWNEETOWN E 1608 UNIVERSITY CT 37 0194 SHAWNEETOWN C 1608 UNIVERSITY CT 37 0236 TOBACCO & HEALTH 1401 UNIVERSITY DR 36 0242 WILDCAT LODGE 347 LEXINGTON AVE 35

Page 292: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

292

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

POPU

LATI

ON E

STIM

ATE

0350 CENTER FOR DRUG & ALCOHOL RESEARCH 643 MAXWELTON CT 34 0073 THOMAS POE COOPER BLDG 730 ROSE ST 33 0031 FRAZEE HALL 406 ADMINISTRATION DR 32 0504 SIGMA CHI FRATERNITY 447 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE 31 0505 SIGMA PHI EPSILON 441 PENNSYLVANIA AVE 31 0024 LAFFERTY HALL 150 PATTERSON DR 29 0070 WENNER-GREN RESEARCH LAB 600 ROSE ST 29 0078 MEDICAL CENTER ANNEX #5 1096 VA DR 29 0028 BARKER HALL / BUELL ARMORY 408 ADMINISTRATION DR 28 0056 BRECKINGRIDGE HALL 168 FUNKHOUSER DR 27 0277 NUTTER FOOTBALL BLDG 720 SPORTS CENTER DR 27 0047 CW MATHEWS BLDG 606 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST 24 0029 ALUMNI GYM 102 AVENUE OF CHAMPIONS 23 0071 FOOD STORAGE K-LAIRL 318 HILLTOP AVE 22 0076 DIMMOCK ANIMAL PATHOLOGY 1095 VA DR 22 0119 ALUMNI BLDG 400 ROSE ST 22 0286 ASTECC 145 GRAHAM AVE 22 0060 RESEARCH & DEV CTR 149 WASHINGTON AV 21 0103 REYNOLDS WAREHOUSE #3 347 SCOTT AVE 21 0087 MED CENTER STORAGE FAC 1530 STADIUM VIEW 19 0222 COMMONWEALTH STADIUM 1540 UNIVERSITY DR. 17 0035 MILLER HALL 504 ADMINISTRATION DR 16 0243 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 1 300 ALUMNI DR 14 0244 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 2 300 ALUMNI DR 14

Page 293: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

293

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

POPU

LATI

ON E

STIM

ATE

0245 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 3 300 ALUMNI DR 14 0246 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 4 300 ALUMNI DR 14 0247 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 5 300 ALUMNI DR 14 0248 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 6 300 ALUMNI DR 14 0249 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 7 300 ALUMNI DR 14 0250 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 8 300 ALUMNI DR 14 0251 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 9 300 ALUMNI DR 14 0252 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 10 300 ALUMNI DR 14 0253 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 11 300 ALUMNI DR 14 0254 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 12 300 ALUMNI DR 14 0255 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 13 300 ALUMNI DR 14 0256 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 14 300 ALUMNI DR 14 0257 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 15 300 ALUMNI DR 14 0258 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 16 300 ALUMNI DR 14 0259 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 17 300 ALUMNI DR 14 0260 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 18 300 ALUMNI DR 14 0261 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 19 300 ALUMNI DR 14 0262 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 20 300 ALUMNI DR 14 0263 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 21 300 ALUMNI DR 14 0264 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 22 300 ALUMNI DR 14 0265 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 23 300 ALUMNI DR 14 0266 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 24 300 ALUMNI DR 14 0267 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 25 300 ALUMNI DR 14 0333 APPLACHIAN CENTER ANNEX 641 SOUTH LIMESTONE 14

Page 294: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

294

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

POPU

LATI

ON E

STIM

ATE

0238 APARTMENTS/16 UNITS - UK 404 LINDEN WALK 13 0002 SCOTT STREET BUILDING 110 SCOTT ST 12 0601 PARKING STRUCTURE #8 110 TRANSCRIPT 12 0611 SAMARITAN MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING 125 E. MAXWELL 12 0043 SJ SAM WHALEN BLDG 533 S LIMESTONE 11 0345 MAX KADE GERMAN HOUSE 212 E MAXWELL ST 11 0240 APARTMENTS/10 UNITS-UK 468 ROSE LN 10

0220 BERNARD JOHNSON STUDENT RECREATION CENTER 434 COMPLEX DRIVE 9

0347 OFFICES 624 MAXWELTON CT 9 0442 LIGON HOUSE 658 SOUTH LLIMESTONE STREET 8 0085 MED CTR HEATING-COOLING 151 HOSPITAL DR 7 0092 SEED HOUSE 150 HOSPITAL DR 7 0097 ES GOOD BARN 1451 UNIVERSITY DR 6 0209 CENTRIFUGE BUILDING 310 HILLTOP AVE 6 0212 LANCASTER AQUATIC CENTER 416 COMPLEX DR 6 0285 NUTTER FIELD HOUSE 1401 SPORTS CENTER DR 6 0021 ENG RES/SCHOOL OF MUSIC 421 ROSE ST 5 0302 DORTHA SMITH OATTS VISITOR CENTER 500 ALUMNI DR. 5 0417 LEARNING SERVICES CENTER 660 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST 5 0014 BOONE FACULTY CENTER 500 ROSE ST 4 0184 AG MACHINERY RESEARCH LAB 411 STADIUM VIEW DR 4 0202 PARKING STRUCTURE #5 409 S LIMESTONE 4 0216 MULTI-DISC RESEARCH FACILITY 700 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST 4

Page 295: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

295

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

POPU

LATI

ON E

STIM

ATE

0216 MULTI-DISC RESEARCH FACILITY 700 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST 4 0229 AGR DISTRIBUTION CENTER 412 STADIUM VIEW DR 4 0487 UK-RENTAL PROPERTY 518 OLDHAM CT 4 0489 MEDICAL CENTER OFFICE 1117 S LIMESTONE 4

0506 ROBERT STRAUS BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH BUILDING 515 OLDHAM CT 4

0269 COMMUNICATIONS BUILDING 301 ROSE ST 3 0344 RAY F BETTS HOUSE 232 E MAXWELL ST 3 0346 RESIDENCE - UK 654 MAXWELTON CT 3 0402 SCHOOL FOUR MUSIC AC OFC 111 WASHINGTON AVE 147 WASHINGTON AVE 3 0433 SCHMIDT VOCAL ARTS 412-414 ROSE STREET 3 0482 RESIDENCE-UK 408 LINDEN WALK 3 0004 CENTRAL HEATING PLANT #2 598 S UPPER ST 2 0049 MEMORIAL HALL - UK 610 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST 2 0213 BOONE TENNIS COMPLEX 454 COMPLEX DR 2 0353 OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 520 OLDHAM CT 2 0102 REYNOLDS WAREHOUSE #2 351 SCOTT AVE 1 0287 ELECTRIC HVAC BLDG 425 STADIUM VIEW DR 1 0351 JEFF HARRIS PSYCH SER CTR 644 MAXWELTON CT 1 0400 ELLEN H RICHARDS HS 630 MAXWELTON CT 1 0460 CENTER ON DRUG & ALCOHOL RESEARCH 149 TRANSCRIPT AVE 1 0568 NORTH DORM 125 AVENUE OF CHAMPIONS 1 0010 HAMILTON HOUSE - UK 342 S LIMESTONE 0 0020 GARAGE ENG TRANSPORTATION 533 S LIMESTONE 0

Page 296: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

296

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

POPU

LATI

ON E

STIM

ATE

0026 STUDENT CENTER ADDITION 200 AVENUE OF CHAMPIONS 0 0040 MAXWELL PLACE 471 ROSE ST 0 0052 CIVIL ENGINEERING 140 GRAHAM AVE 0 0061 TOBACCO RESEARCH LAB 150 WASHINGTON AVE 0 0061 TOBACCO RESEARCH LAB 150 WASHINGTON AVE 0 0061 TOBACCO RESEARCH LAB 150 WASHINGTON AVE 0 0062 INSECTORY CONSERVATORY 146 WASHINGTON AVE 0 0062 INSECTORY CONSERVATORY 146 WASHINGTON AVE 0 0062 INSECTORY CONSERVATORY 146 WASHINGTON AVE 0 0065 SMALL ANIMAL LAB 150 KY CLINIC DR 0 0066 AGRONOMY H HOUSE-G HOUSE 111 WASHINGTON AVE 152 KY CLINIC DR 0 0067 CHI OMEGA SORORITY - UK 456 ROSE ST 39 0068 DELTA DELTA DELTA SORORITY 468 ROSE ST 45 0069 ALPHA DELTA PI SORORITY 476 ROSE ST 49 0088 AG MOTOR POOL 1505 COLLEGE WAY 0 0089 COOLING PLANT #1 195 HOSPITAL DR 0 0094 COOPER HOUSE 1312 NICHOLASVILLE RD 0 0110 MAINTENANCE BLDG-ATHLETIC 700 SPORTS CENTER DR 0 0112 ALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY 341 HILLTOP AVE 26 0113 SHIVELY SPORTS CENTER 712 SPORTS CENTER DR 0 0114 TRACK STORAGE BLDG 698 SPORTS CENTER DR 0 0115 ALPHA GAMMA RHO FRATERNITY 701 WOODLAND AVE 36 0118 FRATERNITIES HOUSE STG 460 HILLTOP AVE 0 0121 SIGMA NU - UK 422 ROSE LN 0

Page 297: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

297

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

POPU

LATI

ON E

STIM

ATE

0122 DELTA GAMMA SORORITY 450 PENNSYLVANIA AVE 50 0124 DELTA ZETA SORORITY 319 COLUMBIA TER 42 0125 KAPPA ALPHA THETA SORORITY 329 COLUMBIA TER 42 0127 ALPHA GAMMA DELTA SORORITY 325 COLUMBIA TER 42 0128 KAPPA DELTA SORORITY 323 COLUMBIA TER 42 0137 LAMDA CHI ALPHA FRATERNITY 419 HUGELET AVENUE 24 0138 PHI SIGMA KAPPA FRATERNITY 439 HUGELET AVE 22 0140 KAPPA SIGMA FRATERNITY 460 HILLTOP AVE 24 0142 FARMHOUSE FRATERNITY 420 HILLTOP AVE 36 0154 SCIENCE BLDG 411 STADIUM VIEW DR 0 0155 GREENHOUSE #2 150 HOSPITAL DR 0 0156 GREENHOUSE #4 150 HOSPITAL DR 0 0157 GREENHOUSE #7 150 HOSPITAL DR 0 0158 GREENHOUSE #5 150 HOSPITAL DR 0 0159 GREENHOUSE #3 150 HOSPITAL DR 0 0160 GREENHOUSE #1 150 HOSPITAL DR 0 0161 GREENHOUSE #9 150 HOSPITAL DR 0 0162 GREENHOUSE #11 560 WILDCAT CT 150 HOSPITAL DR 0 0163 GREENHOUSE #6 150 HOSPITAL DR 0 0164 HORTICULTURE GREENHOUSE 150 HOSPITAL DR 0 0177 RESIDENCE MOTOR POOL 1505 COLLEGE WAY 0 0182 ISOLATION BARN/INCINERATOR 1525 COLLEGE WAY 0 0183 ISOLATION BARN 1529 COLLEGE WAY 0 0185 CARPORT FOR BLDG. 177 1505 COLLEGE WAY 0

Page 298: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

298

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

POPU

LATI

ON E

STIM

ATE

0197 PARKING STRUCTURE #1 1290 TOBACCO ROAD 0 0199 PARKING STRUCTURE #3 140 KY CLINIC DR 0 0204 COOLING PLANT #2 591 S UPPER ST 0 0204 COOLING PLANT #2 591 S UPPER ST 0 0207 METAL ARTS BUILDING 357 SCOTT AVE 0 0210 REYNOLDS WAREHOUSE #4 355 SCOTT AVE 0 0211 MAXWELL PLACE GARAGE 475 ROSE ST 0 0214 FLAMMABLE STORAGE BLDG 148 GRAHAM AVE 0 0223 UNIV MEDICAL PLAZA 745 ROSE ST 0 0227 RECREATION EQ BLDG 454 COMPLEX DR 0 0231 FARM MAINT STORAGE SHED 1521 COLLEGE WAY 0 0235 J. OSWALD BLDG. 470 COOPER DR. 0 0237 WENNER-GREN RSCH ADDITION 172 ROSE ST 0 0268 FOOD STORE LAUNDRY 300 ALUMNI DR STE 213 0 0272 INFORMATION BUILDING 1540 UNIVERSITY DRIVE 0 0274 MOLONEY BLDG 450 COOPER DR. 0 0278 PPD STORAGE BLDG 425 STADIUM VIEW DR 0 0279 MAT STORAGE BLDG 460 STADIUM VIEW DR 0 0282 GAS STORAGE BLDG M & M 540 ROSE ST 0 0283 HAGAN BASEBALL STADIUM 700 SPORTS CENTER DR 0 0283 HAGAN BASEBALL STADIUM 700 SPORTS CENTER DR 0 0283 HAGAN BASEBALL STADIUM 700 SPORTS CENTER DR 0 0288 GREENHOUSE & LAB 455 STADIUM VIEW DR 0 0289 HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE 475 STADIUM VIEW DR 0

Page 299: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

299

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

POPU

LATI

ON E

STIM

ATE

0300 ARBORETUM TOOL SHED 500 ARBORETUM WAY 0 0301 RENTAL PROPERTIES 154 BONNIE BRAE DR 0 0314 RENTAL PROPERTIES 252 E MAXWELL ST 0 0315 HUMANITIES COUNSEL 206 E MAXWELL ST 0 0322 417 COLUMBIA AVE 0 0336 THOMAS D CLARK BLDG 663 S LIMESTONE 0 0337 5-CAR GARAGE 663 S LIMESTONE 0 0343 BINGHAM DAVIS HOUSE 218 E MAXWELL ST 0 0348 RESIDENCE-UK 626 MAXWELTON CT 0 0349 FACULTY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT 641 MAXWELTON CT 0 0361 RESIDENCE-UK 402 PENNSYLVANIA CT 0 0362 RESIDENCE-UK 405 PENNSYLVANIA CT 0 0363 RESIDENCE-UK 406 PENNSYLVANIA CT 0 0365 RESIDENCE W/DETCH GARAGE 410 PENNSYLVANIA CT 0 0377 STUDENT HOUSING - UK 319 ROSE LN 0 0378 STUDENT HOUSING - UK 321 ROSE LN 0 0381 3-UNIT APT BUILDING 162-164 GAZETTE AVE 0 0386 150 GAZETTE AVENUE 150 GAZETTE AVE 0 0401 WELDON HOUSE 635 MAXWELTON CT 0 0412 403 PENNSYLVANIA CT 403 PENNSYLVANIA CT 0 0413 LOCKER/SHOWER/RESTROOM-UK 560 WILDCAT CT 570 WILDCAT CT 0 0420 CHILD DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH CENTER 424 EUCLID AVE 0 0428 2 RENTAL UNITS - UK 457 WOODLAND AVE 0 0432 COMMONWEALTH HOUSE 226 E MAXWELL ST 0

Page 300: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

300

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

POPU

LATI

ON E

STIM

ATE

0449 SHIVELY GROUNDS STORAGE BLDG 712 SPORTS CENTER DR 0 0450 SOFTBALL MAINTENANCE 560 WILDCAT CT 0 0451 SOCCERFIELD COMPLEX 550 WILDCAT CT 0 0451 SOCCERFIELD COMPLEX 550 WILDCAT CT 0 0452 SOFTBALL COMPLEX 570 WILDCAT CT 0 0453 SHIVELY GROUNDS BLDG 712 SPORTS CENTER DR 0 0461 UK MED CTR 153 TRANSCRIPT AVE 0 0467 220 TRANSCRIPT AVE 220 TRANSCRIPT AVE 0 0473 RESIDENCE 505 OLDHAM CT 0 0484 518 OLDHAM CT. GARAGE 518 OLDHAM CT 0 0485 BOONE TENNIS STADIUM 725 SPORTS CENTER DR 0 0490 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MGT 355 COOPER DR 0 0510 456 ROSE LANE - RENTAL 456 ROSE LN 0 0511 RENTAL/DWELLING 456 ROSE LN 0 0514 CENTRAL UTILITIES PLANT 761 PRESS AVENUE CENTRAL UTILITIES PLANT 0 0514 CENTRAL UTILITIES PLANT 761 PRESS AVENUE CENTRAL UTILITIES PLANT 0

0518 BBRSB GENERATOR BUILDING 751 PRESS AVENUE BBRSB GENERATOR BUILDING 0

0572 PARKING STRUCTURE #7 721 SPORTS CENTER DRIVE 0 0582 UNIVERSITY HEALTH SERVICES 830 S. LIMESTONE ST 0 0585 BASEBALL TRAINING PAVILLION 702 SPORTS CENTER DR 0 0600 ELIZABETHTOWN CC LIBRARY 600 COLLEGE STREET RD 0 0612 SAMARITAN CHILLER BUILDING 320 S. LIMESTONE ST 0 0613 SAMARITAN PARKING STRUCTURE 330 S. LIMESTONE ST 0

Page 301: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

301

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

POPU

LATI

ON E

STIM

ATE

0614 123 WARREN COURT 123 WARREN CT 0 0615 125 WARREN COURT 125 WARREN CT 0 0616 SEATON CENTER STORAGE 1214 UNIVERSITY DR 0

Page 302: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

302

Appendix 13: Facility Research Value Elements at Risk Rank Table

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

RESE

ARCH

VAL

UE

0293 UK HOSPITAL 800 ROSE ST $88,105,300 0456 WT YOUNG LIBRARY 401 HILLTOP AVE $46,061,311 0298 MEDICAL SCIENCE 800 ROSE ST $16,502,949 0055 CHEMISTRY-PHYSICS 505 ROSE ST $14,151,601 0039 KING LIBRARY 179 FUNKHOUSER DR $13,617,873 0294 GILL HEART INSTITUTE 800 ROSE STREET $12,721,600 0048 LAW BUILDING 620 S LIMESTONE ST $11,306,757 0286 ASTECC 145 GRAHAM AVE $10,326,447 0224 MI KING LIBRARY ANNEX 179 FUNKHOUSER DR $10,269,464 0046 ANDERSON HALL-TOWER 512 ADMINISTRATION DR $8,097,936

0098 MRISC /WOMEN'S CANCER FACILITY (EXT TO 0099) 740 ROSE ST $8,033,563

0305 HEALTH SCIENCE RESEARCH 1095 VA DR $7,741,707 0093 ROACH BEN CANCER BLDG 750 ROSE ST $6,136,200 0223 UNIV MEDICAL PLAZA 745 ROSE ST $5,988,400 0200 CHARLES T. WETHINGTON JR. BUILDING 900 S. LIMESTONE $5,644,904 0005 FD PETERSON SERVICE BLDG 411 S LIMESTONE $5,003,552 0017 DICKEY HALL 251 SCOTT STREET $4,943,255 0312 PLANT SCIENCE BUILDING 1405 VETERAN AVE. $4,729,157 0082 COLLEGE OF PHARMACY 725 ROSE ST $4,273,564 0297 DENTAL 800 ROSE ST $4,119,900 0230 SANDERS BROWN 800 S LIMESTONE ST $3,648,377

Page 303: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

303

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

RESE

ARCH

VAL

UE

0091 AG SCIENCE CENTER & AUD 1100 NICHOLASVILLE RD $3,622,506 0059 BOWMAN HALL 151 WASHINGTON AVE $3,386,757 0225 THE MORGAN BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE 675 ROSE ST $3,331,222

0503 RALPH G ANDERSON BUILDING RALPH G ANDERSON BUILDING 506 ADMINISTRATION DR. $3,151,504

0096 COMBS CANCER RESEARCH 744 ROSE ST $3,113,218 0099 GLUCK EQUINE BLDG 1400 NICHOLASVILLE RD $3,094,925 0108 ROBOTICS FACILITY 143 GRAHAM AVE $3,094,925 0604 JOE CRAFT CENTER 338 LEXINGTON AVE. $3,000,000 0107 MINING/MINERALS BLDG 504 ROSE ST $2,665,501 0232 NURSING 751 ROSE ST $2,451,450 0284 KENTUCKY CLINIC 750 S LIMESTONE ST $2,341,000 0215 GARRIGUS BLDG 325 COOPER DR $2,189,224 0236 TOBACCO & HEALTH 1401 UNIVERSITY DR $2,177,261 0277 NUTTER FOOTBALL BLDG 720 SPORTS CENTER DR $1,906,917 0216 MULTI-DISC RESEARCH FACILITY 700 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST $1,877,048 0216 MULTI-DISC RESEARCH FACILITY 700 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST $1,877,048 0043 SJ SAM WHALEN BLDG 533 S LIMESTONE $1,722,044 0276 AG ENGINEERING BUILDING 1398 NICHOLASVILLE RD $1,576,170 0275 POUNDSTONE REG SERVICES 1600 UNIVERSITY CT $1,566,222 0019 MEMORIAL COLISEUM 201 AVE OF CHAMPIONS $1,523,928 0025 WHITE HALL CLASSROOM BLDG 140 PATTERSON DR $1,411,680 0281 OLIVER H RAYMOND CENTER 508 ADMINISTRATION DR $1,377,922 0041 PENCE HALL 175 LIBRARY DR $1,284,131 0001 TAYLOR EDUCATION 597 S UPPER ST $1,038,585

Page 304: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

304

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

RESE

ARCH

VAL

UE

0565 JOHN T. SMITH HALL 740 WOODLAND AVENUE $1,000,000 0566 BALDWIN HALL 701 SPORTS CENTER DRIVE $1,000,000 0567 INGELS HALL 705 SPORTS CENTER DRIVE $1,000,000 0568 NORTH DORM 125 AVENUE OF CHAMPIONS $1,000,000 0045 MC VEY HALL 165 FUNKHOUSER DR $980,411 0103 REYNOLDS WAREHOUSE #3 347 SCOTT AVE $946,321 0073 THOMAS POE COOPER BLDG 730 ROSE ST $936,388 0054 FUNKHOUSER 160 FUNKHOUSER DR $926,020 0147 DORM COMPLEX CENTRAL FACILITY 770 WOODLAND AVE $865,404 0053 SLONE RESEARCH BLDG 111 WASHINGTON AVE 121 WASHINGTON AVE $850,947 0076 DIMMOCK ANIMAL PATHOLOGY 1095 VA DR $844,430 0209 CENTRIFUGE BUILDING 310 HILLTOP AVE $802,698 0064 SCOVELL HALL 670 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST $758,311 0198 PARKING STRUCTURE #2 538 ROSE ST. $673,000 0022 FINE ARTS GUIGNOL 465 ROSE ST $614,865 0034 BUSINESS ECON BLDG 550 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST $579,600 0495 JAMES F HARDYMAN BUILDING 301 ROSE ST $569,930 0070 WENNER-GREN RESEARCH LAB 600 ROSE ST $548,614 0023 SAFETY & SECURITY 305 E EUCLID AVE $544,732 0033 EZRA GILLIS BUILDING 502 ADMINISTRATION DR $542,469 0032 MAIN ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 410 ADMINISTRATION DR $528,700 0042 GREHAN JOURNALISM 167 FUNKHOUSER DR $525,847 0219 SEATON HPER BLDG 1210 UNIVERSITY DR $504,930 0514 CENTRAL UTILITIES PLANT 761 PRESS AVENUE CENTRAL UTILITIES PLANT $500,000 0514 CENTRAL UTILITIES PLANT 761 PRESS AVENUE CENTRAL UTILITIES PLANT $500,000

Page 305: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

305

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

RESE

ARCH

VAL

UE

0518 BBRSB GENERATOR BUILDING 751 PRESS AVENUE BBRSB GENERATOR BUILDING $500,000

0241 SINGLETARY CENTER 405 ROSE ST $472,894 0044 KASTLE HALL 171 FUNKHOUSER DR $442,285

0220 BERNARD JOHNSON STUDENT RECREATION CENTER 434 COMPLEX DRIVE $424,272

0075 KELLY HALL 360 HUGUELET DR $361,800 0086 COLLEGE OF MEDICINE 1100 VA DR $359,100 0012 BLAZER HALL 343 MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD. $332,684 0092 SEED HOUSE 150 HOSPITAL DR $329,879 0071 FOOD STORAGE K-LAIRL 318 HILLTOP AVE $317,947 0285 NUTTER FIELD HOUSE 1401 SPORTS CENTER DR $294,558 0509 BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH FACILTIY 741 SOUTH LIMESTONE $273,576 0050 ERIKSON HALL 135 GRAHAM AVE $255,171 0154 SCIENCE BLDG 411 STADIUM VIEW DR $247,676 0237 WENNER-GREN RSCH ADDITION 172 ROSE ST $243,508 0222 COMMONWEALTH STADIUM 1540 UNIVERSITY DR. $209,207 0129 SIGMA KAPPA SORORITY 321 COLUMBIA TER $196,651 0126 PHI DELTA THETA FRATERNITY 327 COLUMBIA TER $189,762 0087 MED CENTER STORAGE FACILITY 1530 STADIUM VIEW $184,250 0101 REYNOLDS WAREHOUSE #1 349 SCOTT AVE $171,663 0003 RESEARCH FACILITY #1 111 WASHINGTON AVE 150 HOSPITAL DR $158,732 0072 DONOVAN HALL 680 ROSE ST $155,978 0052 CIVIL ENGINEERING 140 GRAHAM AVE $129,047 0113 SHIVELY SPORTS CENTER 712 SPORTS CENTER DR $102,508

Page 306: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

306

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

RESE

ARCH

VAL

UE

0026 STUDENT CENTER ADDITION 200 AVENUE OF CHAMPIONS $99,314 0288 GREENHOUSE & LAB 455 STADIUM VIEW DR $95,429 0110 MAINTENANCE BLDG-ATHLETIC 700 SPORTS CENTER DR $95,419 0229 AGR DISTRIBUTION CENTER 412 STADIUM VIEW DR $94,718 0213 BOONE TENNIS COMPLEX 454 COMPLEX DR $92,603 0035 MILLER HALL 504 ADMINISTRATION DR $89,067 0202 PARKING STRUCTURE #5 409 S LIMESTONE $88,249 0061 TOBACCO RESEARCH LAB 150 WASHINGTON AVE $83,905 0061 TOBACCO RESEARCH LAB 150 WASHINGTON AVE $83,905 0061 TOBACCO RESEARCH LAB 150 WASHINGTON AVE $83,905 0020 GARAGE ENG TRANSPORTATION 533 S LIMESTONE $82,313 0014 BOONE FACULTY CENTER 500 ROSE ST $73,764 0184 AG MACHINERY RESEARCH LAB 411 STADIUM VIEW DR $69,415 0507 SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON 410 ROSE LN $67,219 0057 KINKEAD HALL 172 FUNKHOUSER DR $66,301 0402 SCHOOL FOUR MUSIC AC OFC 111 WASHINGTON AVE 147 WASHINGTON AVE $62,000 0145 D COMPLEX-BLANDING (BLANDING TOWER) 769 WOODLAND AVE $59,326 0047 CW MATHEWS BLDG 606 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST $57,705 0038 MINING LABORATORY 169 FUNKHOUSER DR $56,711 0051 MINERAL INDUSTRIES BLDG 120 GRAHAM AVE $56,711 0040 MAXWELL PLACE 471 ROSE ST $55,046 0494 JAMES W STUCKERT CAREER 408 ROSE ST $54,216 0314 RENTAL PROPERTIES 252 E MAXWELL ST $50,083 0242 WILDCAT LODGE 347 LEXINGTON AVE $48,509 0207 METAL ARTS BUILDING 357 SCOTT AVE $45,179

Page 307: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

307

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

RESE

ARCH

VAL

UE

0269 COMMUNICATIONS BUILDING 301 ROSE ST $42,494 0132 COOPERSTOWN BLDG C 700 WOODLAND AVE $41,562 0088 AG MOTOR POOL 1505 COLLEGE WAY $40,444 0490 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MGT 355 COOPER DR $39,339 0056 BRECKINGRIDGE HALL 168 FUNKHOUSER DR $36,435 0199 PARKING STRUCTURE #3 140 KY CLINIC DR $34,800 0212 LANCASTER AQUATIC CENTER 416 COMPLEX DR $34,548 0204 COOLING PLANT #2 591 S UPPER ST $33,521 0204 COOLING PLANT #2 591 S UPPER ST $33,521 0160 GREENHOUSE #1 150 HOSPITAL DR $32,400 0119 ALUMNI BLDG 400 ROSE ST $31,755 0078 MEDICAL CENTER ANNEX #5 1096 VA DR $31,291 0162 GREENHOUSE #11 560 WILDCAT CT 150 HOSPITAL DR $29,367 0024 LAFFERTY HALL 150 PATTERSON DR $27,517 0143 DORM COMPLEX LR-7B2 (BLANDING 2) 763 WOODLAND AVE $26,219 0151 DORM COMPLEX LR 2K2 752 WOODLAND AVE $25,473 0400 ELLEN H RICHARDS HS 630 MAXWELTON CT $25,000 0350 CENTER FOR DRUG & ALCOHOL RESEARCH 643 MAXWELTON CT $24,798 0049 MEMORIAL HALL – UK 610 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST $24,058 0451 SOCCERFIELD COMPLEX 550 WILDCAT CT $23,084 0451 SOCCERFIELD COMPLEX 550 WILDCAT CT $23,084 0085 MED CTR HEATING-COOLING 151 HOSPITAL DR $22,088 0114 TRACK STORAGE BLDG 698 SPORTS CENTER DR $21,688 0102 REYNOLDS WAREHOUSE #2 351 SCOTT AVE $21,427 0011 KEENELAND HALL 121 KEENELAND DR $21,265

Page 308: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

308

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

RESE

ARCH

VAL

UE

0008 BOYD HALL 124 KEENELAND DR $20,781 0572 PARKING STRUCTURE #7 721 SPORTS CENTER DRIVE $20,000 0149 DORM COMPLEX KIRWAN 758 WOODLAND AVE $19,236 0060 RESEARCH & DEV CTR 149 WASHINGTON AV $18,981 0268 FOOD STORE LAUNDRY 300 ALUMNI DR STE 213 $17,148 0058 BRADLEY HALL 545 ROSE ST $16,093 0489 MEDICAL CENTER OFFICE 1117 S LIMESTONE $15,803 0345 MAX KADE GERMAN HOUSE 212 E MAXWELL ST $15,645 0413 LOCKER/SHOWER/RESTROOM-UK 560 WILDCAT CT 570 WILDCAT CT $15,576 0442 LIGON HOUSE 658 SOUTH LLIMESTONE STREET $14,315 0504 SIGMA CHI FRATERNITY 447 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE $13,901 0600 ELIZABETHTOWN CC LIBRARY 600 COLLEGE STREET RD $13,400 0150 DORM COMPLEX LR 3K 754 WOODLAND AVE $13,290 0146 DORM COMPLEX 5B4 (BLANDING 4) 767 WOODLAND AVE $13,289 0153 DORM COMPLEX LR8B1 (BLANDING 1) 761 WOODLAND AVE $13,289 0505 SIGMA PHI EPSILON 441 PENNSYLVANIA AVE $10,901 0347 OFFICES 624 MAXWELTON CT $10,853 0097 ES GOOD BARN 1451 UNIVERSITY DR $9,299 0148 DORM COMPLEX 4K4 756 WOODLAND AVE $8,735 0105 COMMONWEALTH VILLAGE #2 1435 NICHOLASVILLE RD $8,551 0015 STURGILL DEVELOPMENT BLDG 450 ROSE ST $8,447 0065 SMALL ANIMAL LAB 150 KY CLINIC DR $8,395 0417 LEARNING SERVICES CENTER 660 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST $8,390 0461 UK MED CTR 153 TRANSCRIPT AVE $7,895 0453 SHIVELY GROUNDS BLDG 712 SPORTS CENTER DR $7,500

Page 309: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

309

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

RESE

ARCH

VAL

UE

0336 THOMAS D CLARK BLDG 663 S LIMESTONE $7,363 0006 HOLMES HALL 101 AVENUE OF CHAMPIONS $6,762 0021 ENG RES/SCHOOL OF MUSIC 421 ROSE ST $6,495 0289 HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE 475 STADIUM VIEW DR $5,700 0482 RESIDENCE-UK 408 LINDEN WALK $5,690 0062 INSECTORY CONSERVATORY 146 WASHINGTON AVE $5,457 0062 INSECTORY CONSERVATORY 146 WASHINGTON AVE $5,457 0062 INSECTORY CONSERVATORY 146 WASHINGTON AVE $5,457 0066 AGRONOMY H HOUSE-G HOUSE 111 WASHINGTON AVE 152 KY CLINIC DR $5,360 0344 RAY F BETTS HOUSE 232 E MAXWELL ST $5,242 8633 SAMARITAN HOSPITAL 310 SOUTH LIMESTONE $5,106 0111 HAGGIN HALL 330 HILLTOP AVE $4,930 0111 HAGGIN HALL 330 HILLTOP AVE $4,930 0433 SCHMIDT VOCAL ARTS 412-414 ROSE STREET $4,763 0283 HAGAN BASEBALL STADIUM 700 SPORTS CENTER DR $4,600 0283 HAGAN BASEBALL STADIUM 700 SPORTS CENTER DR $4,600 0283 HAGAN BASEBALL STADIUM 700 SPORTS CENTER DR $4,600 0007 JEWELL HALL 103 AVENUE OF CHAMPIONS $4,448 0009 PATTERSON HALL 120 KEENELAND DR $4,448 0144 DORM COMPLEX LR-6B3 (BLANDING 3) 765 WOODLAND AVE $4,448 0004 CENTRAL HEATING PLANT #2 598 S UPPER ST $4,300 0333 APPLACHIAN CENTER ANNEX 641 SOUTH LIMESTONE $4,056 0481 LCC ACADEMIC/TECH 470 COOPER DR $2,860 0432 COMMONWEALTH HOUSE 226 E MAXWELL ST $2,700 0302 DORTHA SMITH OATTS VISITOR CENTER 500 ALUMNI DR. $2,667

Page 310: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

310

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

RESE

ARCH

VAL

UE

0089 COOLING PLANT #1 195 HOSPITAL DR $2,507 0452 SOFTBALL COMPLEX 570 WILDCAT CT $2,400 0002 SCOTT STREET BUILDING 110 SCOTT ST $2,008 0010 HAMILTON HOUSE – UK 342 S LIMESTONE $0 0027 PATTERSON OFFICE TOWER 120 PATTERSON DR $0 0028 BARKER HALL / BUELL ARMORY 408 ADMINISTRATION DR $0 0029 ALUMNI GYM 102 AVENUE OF CHAMPIONS $0 0030 STUDENT CENTER 404 S. LIMESTONE ST $0 0031 FRAZEE HALL 406 ADMINISTRATION DR $0 0067 CHI OMEGA SORORITY – UK 456 ROSE ST $0 0068 DELTA DELTA DELTA SORORITY 468 ROSE ST $0 0069 ALPHA DELTA PI SORORITY 476 ROSE ST $0 0094 COOPER HOUSE 1312 NICHOLASVILLE RD $0 0106 COMMONWEALTH VILLAGE 1435 NICHOLASVILLE RD $0 0112 ALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY 341 HILLTOP AVE $0 0115 ALPHA GAMMA RHO FRATERNITY 701 WOODLAND AVE $0 0118 FRATERNITIES HOUSE STG 460 HILLTOP AVE $0 0121 SIGMA NU – UK 422 ROSE LN $0 0122 DELTA GAMMA SORORITY 450 PENNSYLVANIA AVE $0 0124 DELTA ZETA SORORITY 319 COLUMBIA TER $0 0125 KAPPA ALPHA THETA SORORITY 329 COLUMBIA TER $0 0127 ALPHA GAMMA DELTA SORORITY 325 COLUMBIA TER $0 0128 KAPPA DELTA SORORITY 323 COLUMBIA TER $0 0130 COOPERSTOWN BLDG A 700 WOODLAND AVE $0 0131 COOPERSTOWN BLDG B 700 WOODLAND AVE $0

Page 311: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

311

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

RESE

ARCH

VAL

UE

0133 COOPERSTOWN BLDG D 700 WOODLAND AVE $0 0134 COOPERSTOWN APT E 700 WOODLAND AVE $0 0135 COOPERSTOWN BLDG F 700 WOODLAND AVE $0 0136 COOPERSTOWN APT G 700 WOODLAND AVE $0 0137 LAMDA CHI ALPHA FRATERNITY 419 HUGELET AVENUE $0 0138 PHI SIGMA KAPPA FRATERNITY 439 HUGELET AVE $0 0140 KAPPA SIGMA FRATERNITY 460 HILLTOP AVE $0 0142 FARMHOUSE FRATERNITY 420 HILLTOP AVE $0 0152 DORM COMPLEX LR 1K1 750 WOODLAND AVE $0 0155 GREENHOUSE #2 150 HOSPITAL DR $0 0156 GREENHOUSE #4 150 HOSPITAL DR $0 0157 GREENHOUSE #7 150 HOSPITAL DR $0 0158 GREENHOUSE #5 150 HOSPITAL DR $0 0159 GREENHOUSE #3 150 HOSPITAL DR $0 0161 GREENHOUSE #9 150 HOSPITAL DR $0 0163 GREENHOUSE #6 150 HOSPITAL DR $0 0164 HORTICULTURE GREENHOUSE 150 HOSPITAL DR $0 0177 RESIDENCE MOTOR POOL 1505 COLLEGE WAY $0 0182 ISOLATION BARN/INCINERATOR 1525 COLLEGE WAY $0 0183 ISOLATION BARN 1529 COLLEGE WAY $0 0185 CARPORT FOR BLDG. 177 1505 COLLEGE WAY $0 0189 SHAWNEETOWN A 1608 UNIVERSITY CT $0 0190 SHAWNEETOWN B 1608 UNIVERSITY CT $0 0191 SHAWNEETOWN D 1608 UNIVERSITY CT $0 0192 SHAWNEETOWN F 1608 UNIVERSITY CT $0

Page 312: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

312

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

RESE

ARCH

VAL

UE

0193 SHAWNEETOWN E 1608 UNIVERSITY CT $0 0194 SHAWNEETOWN C 1608 UNIVERSITY CT $0 0197 PARKING STRUCTURE #1 1290 TOBACCO ROAD $0 0210 REYNOLDS WAREHOUSE #4 355 SCOTT AVE $0 0211 MAXWELL PLACE GARAGE 475 ROSE ST $0 0214 FLAMMABLE STORAGE BLDG 148 GRAHAM AVE $0 0227 RECREATION EQ BLDG 454 COMPLEX DR $0 0231 FARM MAINT STORAGE SHED 1521 COLLEGE WAY $0 0235 J. OSWALD BLDG. 470 COOPER DR. $0 0238 APARTMENTS/16 UNITS – UK 404 LINDEN WALK $0 0240 APARTMENTS/10 UNITS-UK 468 ROSE LN $0 0243 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 1 300 ALUMNI DR $0 0244 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 2 300 ALUMNI DR $0 0245 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 3 300 ALUMNI DR $0 0246 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 4 300 ALUMNI DR $0 0247 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 5 300 ALUMNI DR $0 0248 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 6 300 ALUMNI DR $0 0249 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 7 300 ALUMNI DR $0 0250 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 8 300 ALUMNI DR $0 0251 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 9 300 ALUMNI DR $0 0252 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 10 300 ALUMNI DR $0 0253 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 11 300 ALUMNI DR $0 0254 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 12 300 ALUMNI DR $0 0255 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 13 300 ALUMNI DR $0 0256 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 14 300 ALUMNI DR $0

Page 313: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

313

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

RESE

ARCH

VAL

UE

0257 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 15 300 ALUMNI DR $0 0258 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 16 300 ALUMNI DR $0 0259 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 17 300 ALUMNI DR $0 0260 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 18 300 ALUMNI DR $0 0261 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 19 300 ALUMNI DR $0 0262 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 20 300 ALUMNI DR $0 0263 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 21 300 ALUMNI DR $0 0264 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 22 300 ALUMNI DR $0 0265 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 23 300 ALUMNI DR $0 0266 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 24 300 ALUMNI DR $0 0267 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 25 300 ALUMNI DR $0 0272 INFORMATION BUILDING 1540 UNIVERSITY DRIVE $0 0274 MOLONEY BLDG 450 COOPER DR. $0 0278 PPD STORAGE BLDG 425 STADIUM VIEW DR $0 0279 MAT STORAGE BLDG 460 STADIUM VIEW DR $0 0282 GAS STORAGE BLDG M & M 540 ROSE ST $0 0287 ELECTRIC HVAC BLDG 425 STADIUM VIEW DR $0 0300 ARBORETUM TOOL SHED 500 ARBORETUM WAY $0 0301 RENTAL PROPERTIES 154 BONNIE BRAE DR $0 0315 HUMANITIES COUNSEL 206 E MAXWELL ST $0 0322 417 COLUMBIA AVE $0 0337 5-CAR GARAGE 663 S LIMESTONE $0 0343 BINGHAM DAVIS HOUSE 218 E MAXWELL ST $0 0346 RESIDENCE – UK 654 MAXWELTON CT $0 0348 RESIDENCE-UK 626 MAXWELTON CT $0

Page 314: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

314

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

RESE

ARCH

VAL

UE

0349 FACULTY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT 641 MAXWELTON CT $0 0351 JEFF HARRIS PSYCH SER CTR 644 MAXWELTON CT $0 0353 OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 520 OLDHAM CT $0 0361 RESIDENCE-UK 402 PENNSYLVANIA CT $0 0362 RESIDENCE-UK 405 PENNSYLVANIA CT $0 0363 RESIDENCE-UK 406 PENNSYLVANIA CT $0 0365 RESIDENCE W/DETCH GARAGE 410 PENNSYLVANIA CT $0 0377 STUDENT HOUSING – UK 319 ROSE LN $0 0378 STUDENT HOUSING – UK 321 ROSE LN $0 0381 3-UNIT APT BUILDING 162-164 GAZETTE AVE $0 0386 150 GAZETTE AVENUE 150 GAZETTE AVE $0 0401 WELDON HOUSE 635 MAXWELTON CT $0 0412 403 PENNSYLVANIA CT 403 PENNSYLVANIA CT $0 0420 CHILD DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH CENTER 424 EUCLID AVE $0 0428 2 RENTAL UNITS – UK 457 WOODLAND AVE $0 0449 SHIVELY GROUNDS STORAGE BLDG 712 SPORTS CENTER DR $0 0450 SOFTBALL MAINTENANCE 560 WILDCAT CT $0 0460 CENTER ON DRUG & ALCOHOL RESEARCH 149 TRANSCRIPT AVE $0 0467 220 TRANSCRIPT AVE 220 TRANSCRIPT AVE $0 0473 RESIDENCE 505 OLDHAM CT $0 0484 518 OLDHAM CT. GARAGE 518 OLDHAM CT $0 0485 BOONE TENNIS STADIUM 725 SPORTS CENTER DR $0 0487 UK-RENTAL PROPERTY 518 OLDHAM CT $0

0506 ROBERT STRAUS BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH BUILDING 515 OLDHAM CT $0

Page 315: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

315

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

RESE

ARCH

VAL

UE

0510 456 ROSE LANE – RENTAL 456 ROSE LN $0 0511 RENTAL/DWELLING 456 ROSE LN $0 0517 MERSACK / LEAVELL BLDG. 807 S. LIMESTONE ST $0 0564 IRIS PROJECT BUILDING 630 SOUTH BROADWAY $0 0571 PARKING STRUCTURE #6 721 PRESS AVE $0 0582 UNIVERSITY HEALTH SERVICES 830 S. LIMESTONE ST $0 0585 BASEBALL TRAINING PAVILLION 702 SPORTS CENTER DR $0 0601 PARKING STRUCTURE #8 110 TRANSCRIPT $0 0611 SAMARITAN MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING 125 E. MAXWELL $0 0612 SAMARITAN CHILLER BUILDING 320 S. LIMESTONE ST $0 0613 SAMARITAN PARKING STRUCTURE 330 S. LIMESTONE ST $0 0614 123 WARREN COURT 123 WARREN CT $0 0615 125 WARREN COURT 125 WARREN CT $0 0616 SEATON CENTER STORAGE 1214 UNIVERSITY DR $0

Page 316: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

316

Appendix 14: Facility Critical Facilities Elements at Risk Rank Table

Bldg No. Bldg Name Address City ST Zip Justification

0004 Central Heating Plant #2 598 S Upper St Lexington KY 40506 Redundant steam feed capbility for the Medical Center (and has been used), plus is the sole heat source for 40% +/- of building square feet on campus.

0005 Frank D. Peterson Service Bldg 411 S Limestone St Lexington KY 40506 Home to remote building controls, hard copies of building drawing plan sets,

0023 Police (Safety and Security) 305 Euclid Ave Lexington KY 40506 Public Safety and 911 Dispatch Operation housed in this building 0045 McVey Hall 165 Funkhouser Dr Lexington KY 40506 Computing data center for campus, plus McVey houses WUKY

national public radio station.

0085 Medical Center Heating and Cooling Plant 151 Hospital Drive Lexington KY 40536 Supports hospital operations, plus is the sole heat source for 40% +/- of building square feet on campus.

0089 Cooling Plant #1 195 Hospital Drive Lexington KY 40506 Redundant feed capability to Medical Center 0198 Parking Garage #2 301 Hilltop Avenue Lexington KY 40508 Landline communications hub for the University. 0204 Cooling Plant #2 591 S Upper St Lexington KY 40506 Redundant cooling feed capability to Medical Center 0217 Electrical Substation #2 587 S. Upper St Lexington KY 40506 Redundant electrical substation feed for hospital (and has been

used as such)

0223 Warren Wright Medical Center (aka Ky. Clinic Wings 'A', 'B' & 'C'

Lexington KY 40506 Primary outpatient clinic facility for campus.

0284 Kentucky Clinic (aka Ky. Clinic Wing 'D') Lexington KY 40506 Primary outpatient clinic facility for campus. 0293 Chandler Medical Center and Hospital 800 Rose St Lexington KY 40536 Level 1 Trauma Center for the State and inpatient treatment

facility.

0514 Biological/Biomedical Research Bldg Utility Plant 751 Press Avenue Lexington KY 40506 Redundant heating/cooling plant for Medical Center, plus sole heat source for 20% +/- of square feet on campus.

Page 317: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

317

Bldg No. Bldg Name Address City ST Zip Justification

0518 Biological/Biomedical Research Bldg Generator Bldg 761 Press Avenue Lexington KY 40506 Redundant feed for Medical Center 0612 Samaritan Chiller Building 320 South

Limestone Lexington KY 40508 Supports hospital operations.

1200 Electrical Substation #1 198 Hopsital Dr Lexington KY 40503 Primary electrical sub-station for Medical Center 1201 Electrical Substation #3 829 Press Ave Lexington KY 40508 Redundant electrical sub-station feed for Medical Center 8633 UK HealthCare-Good Samaritan Hospital 310 South

Limestone Lexington KY 40508 Hospital. (both inpatient and out patient care)

0027 Patterson Office Tower 120 Patterson Dr Lexington KY 40506 Communication Antenna's for UKPD, LFUCG Fire Dept. (backup), and PPD radios

0148 Kirwarn Tower 756 Woodland Ave Lexington KY 40526 Communication Antenna's on roof for Kentucky State Police, KEWS, backup for Lexington Public Schools, WUKY, etc…

0145 Blanding Tower 769 Woodland Ave Lexington KY 40526 Communication Antenna's on roof for Kentucky State Police, KEWS, backup for Lexington Public Schools, WUKY, etc…

Page 318: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

318

Appendix 15: Facility Replacement Cost Elements at Risk Rank Table

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

REPL

ACEM

ENT

COST

0293 UK HOSPITAL 800 ROSE ST $288,659,800 0456 WT YOUNG LIBRARY 401 HILLTOP AVE $142,490,700 8633 SAMARITAN HOSPITAL 310 SOUTH LIMESTONE $139,038,900 0222 COMMONWEALTH STADIUM 1540 UNIVERSITY DR. $133,238,600 0298 MEDICAL SCIENCE 800 ROSE ST $114,296,600 0509 BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH FACILTIY 741 SOUTH LIMESTONE $110,745,800 0055 CHEMISTRY-PHYSICS 505 ROSE ST $103,885,100 0085 MED CTR HEATING-COOLING 151 HOSPITAL DR $98,300,400 0019 MEMORIAL COLISEUM 201 AVE OF CHAMPIONS $89,251,800 0027 PATTERSON OFFICE TOWER 120 PATTERSON DR $81,991,800 0200 CHARLES T. WETHINGTON JR. BUILDING 900 S. LIMESTONE $74,079,500 0284 KENTUCKY CLINIC 750 S LIMESTONE ST $60,164,500 0091 AG SCIENCE CENTER & AUD 1100 NICHOLASVILLE RD $55,660,000 0223 UNIV MEDICAL PLAZA 745 ROSE ST $53,003,500 0215 GARRIGUS BLDG 325 COOPER DR $52,333,600 0297 DENTAL 800 ROSE ST $52,255,500 0305 HEALTH SCIENCE RESEARCH 1095 VA DR $50,769,400 0025 WHITE HALL CLASSROOM BLDG 140 PATTERSON DR $46,916,100 0089 COOLING PLANT #1 195 HOSPITAL DR $46,916,100 0030 STUDENT CENTER 404 S. LIMESTONE ST $45,798,500

Page 319: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

319

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

REPL

ACEM

ENT

COST

0034 BUSINESS ECON BLDG 550 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST $45,240,800 0604 JOE CRAFT CENTER 338 LEXINGTON AVE. $43,805,300 0294 GILL HEART INSTITUTE 800 ROSE STREET $43,784,400

0503 RALPH G ANDERSON BUILDING RALPH G ANDERSON BUILDING 506 ADMINISTRATION DR. $43,183,800

0039 KING LIBRARY 179 FUNKHOUSER DR $41,778,000 0093 ROACH BEN CANCER BLDG 750 ROSE ST $41,665,800 0286 ASTECC 145 GRAHAM AVE $41,511,800 0022 FINE ARTS GUIGNOL 465 ROSE ST $39,655,000 0312 PLANT SCIENCE BUILDING 1405 VETERAN AVE. $39,655,000 0145 D COMPLEX-BLANDING (BLANDING TOWER) 769 WOODLAND AVE $38,929,000 0004 CENTRAL HEATING PLANT #2 598 S UPPER ST $38,872,900 0149 DORM COMPLEX KIRWAN 758 WOODLAND AVE $38,571,500 0241 SINGLETARY CENTER 405 ROSE ST $37,756,400 0232 NURSING 751 ROSE ST $37,420,900 0601 PARKING STRUCTURE #8 110 TRANSCRIPT $36,080,000

0098 MRISC /WOMEN'S CANCER FACILITY (EXT TO 0099) 740 ROSE ST $35,745,600

0230 SANDERS BROWN 800 S LIMESTONE ST $34,628,000 0046 ANDERSON HALL-TOWER 512 ADMINISTRATION DR $34,494,900 0032 MAIN ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 410 ADMINISTRATION DR $34,476,200 0235 J. OSWALD BLDG. 470 COOPER DR. $33,511,500 0204 COOLING PLANT #2 591 S UPPER ST $33,399,300 0204 COOLING PLANT #2 591 S UPPER ST $33,399,300

Page 320: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

320

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

REPL

ACEM

ENT

COST

0198 PARKING STRUCTURE #2 538 ROSE ST. $33,193,600 0107 MINING/MINERALS BLDG 504 ROSE ST $32,466,500 0054 FUNKHOUSER 160 FUNKHOUSER DR $32,393,900 0082 COLLEGE OF PHARMACY 725 ROSE ST $32,115,600 0202 PARKING STRUCTURE #5 409 S LIMESTONE $31,589,800 0096 COMBS CANCER RESEARCH 744 ROSE ST $31,389,600 0582 UNIVERSITY HEALTH SERVICES 830 S. LIMESTONE ST $31,277,400 0276 AG ENGINEERING BUILDING 1398 NICHOLASVILLE RD $31,187,200 0005 FD PETERSON SERVICE BLDG 411 S LIMESTONE $30,495,300 0048 LAW BUILDING 620 S LIMESTONE ST $30,159,800 0099 GLUCK EQUINE BLDG 1400 NICHOLASVILLE RD $28,283,200 0072 DONOVAN HALL 680 ROSE ST $28,154,500 0101 REYNOLDS WAREHOUSE #1 349 SCOTT AVE $27,925,700

0220 BERNARD JOHNSON STUDENT RECREATION CENTER 434 COMPLEX DRIVE $27,535,200

0225 TH MORGAN BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE 675 ROSE ST $26,482,500 0111 HAGGIN HALL 330 HILLTOP AVE $25,960,000 0111 HAGGIN HALL 330 HILLTOP AVE $25,960,000 0147 DORM COMPLEX CENTRAL FACILITY 770 WOODLAND AVE $25,960,000 0012 BLAZER HALL 343 MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD. $24,766,500 0001 TAYLOR EDUCATION 597 S UPPER ST $24,217,600 0224 MI KING LIBRARY ANNEX 179 FUNKHOUSER DR $23,575,200 0281 OLIVER H RAYMOND CENTER 508 ADMINISTRATION DR $23,324,400 0514 CENTRAL UTILITIES PLANT 761 PRESS AVENUE CENTRAL UTILITIES PLANT $23,050,500

Page 321: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

321

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

REPL

ACEM

ENT

COST

0514 CENTRAL UTILITIES PLANT 761 PRESS AVENUE CENTRAL UTILITIES PLANT $23,050,500 0011 KEENELAND HALL 121 KEENELAND DR $22,402,600 0108 ROBOTICS FACILITY 143 GRAHAM AVE $22,341,000 0236 TOBACCO & HEALTH 1401 UNIVERSITY DR $22,319,000 0219 SEATON HPER BLDG 1210 UNIVERSITY DR $21,782,200 0571 PARKING STRUCTURE #6 721 PRESS AVE $20,034,300 0285 NUTTER FIELD HOUSE 1401 SPORTS CENTER DR $18,989,300 0566 BALDWIN HALL 701 SPORTS CENTER DRIVE $18,454,700 0006 HOLMES HALL 101 AVENUE OF CHAMPIONS $17,833,200 0026 STUDENT CENTER ADDITION 200 AVENUE OF CHAMPIONS $17,760,600 0216 MULTI-DISC RESEARCH FACILITY 700 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST $17,593,400 0216 MULTI-DISC RESEARCH FACILITY 700 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST $17,593,400 0197 PARKING STRUCTURE #1 1290 TOBACCO ROAD $17,370,100 0565 JOHN T. SMITH HALL 740 WOODLAND AVENUE $17,168,800 0064 SCOVELL HALL 670 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST $16,727,700 0567 INGELS HALL 705 SPORTS CENTER DRIVE $16,574,800 0568 NORTH DORM 125 AVENUE OF CHAMPIONS $16,264,600 0044 KASTLE HALL 171 FUNKHOUSER DR $16,253,600 0212 LANCASTER AQUATIC CENTER 416 COMPLEX DR $16,236,000 0045 MC VEY HALL 165 FUNKHOUSER DR $15,750,900 0507 SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON 410 ROSE LN $15,515,500 0017 DICKEY HALL 251 SCOTT STREET $15,192,100 0277 NUTTER FOOTBALL BLDG 720 SPORTS CENTER DR $14,242,800 0076 DIMMOCK ANIMAL PATHOLOGY 1095 VA DR $14,135,000

Page 322: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

322

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

REPL

ACEM

ENT

COST

0059 BOWMAN HALL 151 WASHINGTON AVE $13,684,000 0199 PARKING STRUCTURE #3 140 KY CLINIC DR $13,147,200 0572 PARKING STRUCTURE #7 721 SPORTS CENTER DRIVE $12,823,800 0130 COOPERSTOWN BLDG A 700 WOODLAND AVE $12,063,700 0041 PENCE HALL 175 LIBRARY DR $11,509,300 0009 PATTERSON HALL 120 KEENELAND DR $11,148,500 0143 DORM COMPLEX LR-7B2 (BLANDING 2) 763 WOODLAND AVE $11,102,300 0153 DORM COMPLEX LR8B1 (BLANDING 1) 761 WOODLAND AVE $11,100,100 0148 DORM COMPLEX 4K4 756 WOODLAND AVE $11,070,400 0144 DORM COMPLEX LR-6B3 (BLANDING 3) 765 WOODLAND AVE $11,025,300 0146 DORM COMPLEX 5B4 (BLANDING 4) 767 WOODLAND AVE $11,025,300 0008 BOYD HALL 124 KEENELAND DR $10,947,200 0150 DORM COMPLEX LR 3K 754 WOODLAND AVE $10,799,800 0151 DORM COMPLEX LR 2K2 752 WOODLAND AVE $10,799,800 0152 DORM COMPLEX LR 1K1 750 WOODLAND AVE $10,799,800 0050 ERIKSON HALL 135 GRAHAM AVE $10,500,600 0611 SAMARITAN MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING 125 E. MAXWELL $10,422,500 0029 ALUMNI GYM 102 AVENUE OF CHAMPIONS $10,258,600 0135 COOPERSTOWN BLDG F 700 WOODLAND AVE $10,254,200 0003 RESEARCH FACILITY #1 111 WASHINGTON AVE 150 HOSPITAL DR $10,052,900 0274 MOLONEY BLDG 450 COOPER DR. $10,052,900 0275 POUNDSTONE REG SERVICES 1600 UNIVERSITY CT $10,052,900 0481 LCC ACADEMIC/TECH 470 COOPER DR $10,052,900 0133 COOPERSTOWN BLDG D 700 WOODLAND AVE $9,991,300

Page 323: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

323

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

REPL

ACEM

ENT

COST

0028 BARKER HALL / BUELL ARMORY 408 ADMINISTRATION DR $9,807,600 0073 THOMAS POE COOPER BLDG 730 ROSE ST $9,762,500 0136 COOPERSTOWN APT G 700 WOODLAND AVE $9,555,700 0042 GREHAN JOURNALISM 167 FUNKHOUSER DR $9,375,300 0134 COOPERSTOWN APT E 700 WOODLAND AVE $9,200,400 0495 JAMES F HARDYMAN BUILDING 301 ROSE ST $8,775,800 0053 SLONE RESEARCH BLDG 111 WASHINGTON AVE 121 WASHINGTON AVE $8,713,100 0132 COOPERSTOWN BLDG C 700 WOODLAND AVE $8,333,600 0007 JEWELL HALL 103 AVENUE OF CHAMPIONS $7,871,600 0043 SJ SAM WHALEN BLDG 533 S LIMESTONE $7,707,700 0056 BRECKINGRIDGE HALL 168 FUNKHOUSER DR $7,595,500 0103 REYNOLDS WAREHOUSE #3 347 SCOTT AVE $7,462,400 0075 KELLY HALL 360 HUGUELET DR $7,372,200 0113 SHIVELY SPORTS CENTER 712 SPORTS CENTER DR $7,150,000 0035 MILLER HALL 504 ADMINISTRATION DR $6,702,300 0049 MEMORIAL HALL – UK 610 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST $6,635,200 0613 SAMARITAN PARKING STRUCTURE 330 S. LIMESTONE ST $6,597,800 0058 BRADLEY HALL 545 ROSE ST $6,535,100 0189 SHAWNEETOWN A 1608 UNIVERSITY CT $6,333,800 0193 SHAWNEETOWN E 1608 UNIVERSITY CT $6,333,800 0194 SHAWNEETOWN C 1608 UNIVERSITY CT $6,333,800 0092 SEED HOUSE 150 HOSPITAL DR $5,885,000 0131 COOPERSTOWN BLDG B 700 WOODLAND AVE $5,864,100 0190 SHAWNEETOWN B 1608 UNIVERSITY CT $5,731,000

Page 324: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

324

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

REPL

ACEM

ENT

COST

0191 SHAWNEETOWN D 1608 UNIVERSITY CT $5,731,000 0192 SHAWNEETOWN F 1608 UNIVERSITY CT $5,731,000 0494 JAMES W STUCKERT CAREER 408 ROSE ST $5,712,300 0057 KINKEAD HALL 172 FUNKHOUSER DR $5,596,800 0071 FOOD STORAGE K-LAIRL 318 HILLTOP AVE $5,584,700 0014 BOONE FACULTY CENTER 500 ROSE ST $5,381,200 0031 FRAZEE HALL 406 ADMINISTRATION DR $5,194,200 0490 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MGT 355 COOPER DR $5,161,200 0119 ALUMNI BLDG 400 ROSE ST $5,094,100 0047 CW MATHEWS BLDG 606 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST $5,027,000 0097 ES GOOD BARN 1451 UNIVERSITY DR $4,975,300 0517 MERSACK / LEAVELL BLDG. 807 S. LIMESTONE ST $4,873,000 0033 EZRA GILLIS BUILDING 502 ADMINISTRATION DR $4,691,500 0051 MINERAL INDUSTRIES BLDG 120 GRAHAM AVE $4,691,500 0102 REYNOLDS WAREHOUSE #2 351 SCOTT AVE $4,669,500 0024 LAFFERTY HALL 150 PATTERSON DR $4,468,200 0068 DELTA DELTA DELTA SORORITY 468 ROSE ST $4,323,000 0504 SIGMA CHI FRATERNITY 447 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE $4,323,000 0505 SIGMA PHI EPSILON 441 PENNSYLVANIA AVE $4,323,000 0069 ALPHA DELTA PI SORORITY 476 ROSE ST $4,138,200 0078 MEDICAL CENTER ANNEX #5 1096 VA DR $4,132,700 0242 WILDCAT LODGE 347 LEXINGTON AVE $4,132,700 0124 DELTA ZETA SORORITY 319 COLUMBIA TER $4,054,600 0125 KAPPA ALPHA THETA SORORITY 329 COLUMBIA TER $4,054,600

Page 325: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

325

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

REPL

ACEM

ENT

COST

0126 PHI DELTA THETA FRATERNITY 327 COLUMBIA TER $4,054,600 0127 ALPHA GAMMA DELTA SORORITY 325 COLUMBIA TER $4,054,600 0128 KAPPA DELTA SORORITY 323 COLUMBIA TER $4,054,600 0129 SIGMA KAPPA SORORITY 321 COLUMBIA TER $4,054,600 0070 WENNER-GREN RESEARCH LAB 600 ROSE ST $3,714,700 0106 COMMONWEALTH VILLAGE 1435 NICHOLASVILLE RD $3,638,800 0038 MINING LABORATORY 169 FUNKHOUSER DR $3,462,800 0122 DELTA GAMMA SORORITY 450 PENNSYLVANIA AVE $3,457,300 0121 SIGMA NU - UK 422 ROSE LN $3,429,800 0137 LAMDA CHI ALPHA FRATERNITY 419 HUGELET AVENUE $3,290,100 0138 PHI SIGMA KAPPA FRATERNITY 439 HUGELET AVE $3,290,100 0140 KAPPA SIGMA FRATERNITY 460 HILLTOP AVE $3,290,100 0142 FARMHOUSE FRATERNITY 420 HILLTOP AVE $3,290,100 0115 ALPHA GAMMA RHO FRATERNITY 701 WOODLAND AVE $3,245,000 0564 IRIS PROJECT BUILDING 630 SOUTH BROADWAY $3,239,500 0067 CHI OMEGA SORORITY - UK 456 ROSE ST $3,183,400 0112 ALPHA TAU OMEGA FRATERNITY 341 HILLTOP AVE $3,116,300 0213 BOONE TENNIS COMPLEX 454 COMPLEX DR $2,882,000 0485 BOONE TENNIS STADIUM 725 SPORTS CENTER DR $2,758,800 0015 STURGILL DEVELOPMENT BLDG 450 ROSE ST $2,747,800 0433 SCHMIDT VOCAL ARTS 412-414 ROSE STREET $2,620,200 0061 TOBACCO RESEARCH LAB 150 WASHINGTON AVE $2,520,100 0061 TOBACCO RESEARCH LAB 150 WASHINGTON AVE $2,520,100 0061 TOBACCO RESEARCH LAB 150 WASHINGTON AVE $2,520,100

Page 326: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

326

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

REPL

ACEM

ENT

COST

0345 MAX KADE GERMAN HOUSE 212 E MAXWELL ST $2,490,400 0612 SAMARITAN CHILLER BUILDING 320 S. LIMESTONE ST $2,468,400 0052 CIVIL ENGINEERING 140 GRAHAM AVE $2,401,300 0154 SCIENCE BLDG 411 STADIUM VIEW DR $2,318,800 0105 COMMONWEALTH VILLAGE #2 1435 NICHOLASVILLE RD $2,235,200 0088 AG MOTOR POOL 1505 COLLEGE WAY $2,234,100 0315 HUMANITIES COUNSEL 206 E MAXWELL ST $2,234,100 0237 WENNER-GREN RSCH ADDITION 172 ROSE ST $2,212,100 0087 MED CENTER STORAGE FACILITY 1530 STADIUM VIEW $2,178,000 0614 123 WARREN COURT 123 WARREN CT $2,164,800 0040 MAXWELL PLACE 471 ROSE ST $2,147,200 0432 COMMONWEALTH HOUSE 226 E MAXWELL ST $2,020,700

0518 BBRSB GENERATOR BUILDING 751 PRESS AVENUE BBRSB GENERATOR BUILDING $2,010,800

0002 SCOTT STREET BUILDING 110 SCOTT ST $1,787,500 0283 HAGAN BASEBALL STADIUM 700 SPORTS CENTER DR $1,731,400 0283 HAGAN BASEBALL STADIUM 700 SPORTS CENTER DR $1,731,400 0283 HAGAN BASEBALL STADIUM 700 SPORTS CENTER DR $1,731,400 0238 APARTMENTS/16 UNITS - UK 404 LINDEN WALK $1,675,300 0336 THOMAS D CLARK BLDG 663 S LIMESTONE $1,658,800 0086 COLLEGE OF MEDICINE OFC 1100 VA DR $1,619,200 0062 INSECTORY CONSERVATORY 146 WASHINGTON AVE $1,597,200 0062 INSECTORY CONSERVATORY 146 WASHINGTON AVE $1,597,200 0062 INSECTORY CONSERVATORY 146 WASHINGTON AVE $1,597,200

Page 327: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

327

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

REPL

ACEM

ENT

COST

0343 BINGHAM DAVIS HOUSE 218 E MAXWELL ST $1,515,800 0344 RAY F BETTS HOUSE 232 E MAXWELL ST $1,401,400 0023 SAFETY & SECURITY 305 E EUCLID AVE $1,340,900 0243 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 1 300 ALUMNI DR $1,317,800 0244 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 2 300 ALUMNI DR $1,317,800 0245 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 3 300 ALUMNI DR $1,317,800 0246 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 4 300 ALUMNI DR $1,317,800 0247 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 5 300 ALUMNI DR $1,317,800 0248 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 6 300 ALUMNI DR $1,317,800 0249 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 7 300 ALUMNI DR $1,317,800 0250 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 8 300 ALUMNI DR $1,317,800 0251 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BLD 9 300 ALUMNI DR $1,317,800 0252 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 10 300 ALUMNI DR $1,317,800 0253 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 11 300 ALUMNI DR $1,317,800 0254 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 12 300 ALUMNI DR $1,317,800 0255 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 13 300 ALUMNI DR $1,317,800 0256 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 14 300 ALUMNI DR $1,317,800 0257 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 15 300 ALUMNI DR $1,317,800 0258 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 16 300 ALUMNI DR $1,317,800 0259 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 17 300 ALUMNI DR $1,317,800 0260 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 18 300 ALUMNI DR $1,317,800 0261 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 19 300 ALUMNI DR $1,317,800 0262 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 20 300 ALUMNI DR $1,317,800 0263 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 21 300 ALUMNI DR $1,317,800

Page 328: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

328

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

REPL

ACEM

ENT

COST

0264 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 22 300 ALUMNI DR $1,317,800 0265 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 23 300 ALUMNI DR $1,317,800 0266 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 24 300 ALUMNI DR $1,317,800 0267 G PAGE STADIUM VIEW BG 25 300 ALUMNI DR $1,317,800 0161 GREENHOUSE #9 150 HOSPITAL DR $1,250,700 0162 GREENHOUSE #11 560 WILDCAT CT 150 HOSPITAL DR $1,250,700 0163 GREENHOUSE #6 150 HOSPITAL DR $1,250,700 0302 DORTHA SMITH OATTS VISITOR CENTER 500 ALUMNI DR. $1,116,500 0314 RENTAL PROPERTIES 252 E MAXWELL ST $1,116,500 0413 LOCKER/SHOWER/RESTROOM-UK 560 WILDCAT CT 570 WILDCAT CT $1,116,500

0506 ROBERT STRAUS BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH BUILDING 515 OLDHAM CT $1,105,500

0229 AGR DISTRIBUTION CENTER 412 STADIUM VIEW DR $1,061,500 0269 COMMUNICATIONS BUILDING 301 ROSE ST $1,061,500 0209 CENTRIFUGE BUILDING 310 HILLTOP AVE $1,005,400 0615 125 WARREN COURT 125 WARREN CT $983,400 0207 METAL ARTS BUILDING 357 SCOTT AVE $971,300 0184 AG MACHINERY RESEARCH LAB 411 STADIUM VIEW DR $893,200 0240 APARTMENTS/10 UNITS-UK 468 ROSE LN $893,200 0066 AGRONOMY H HOUSE-G HOUSE 111 WASHINGTON AVE 152 KY CLINIC DR $818,400 0333 APPLACHIAN CENTER ANNEX 641 SOUTH LIMESTONE $800,800 0065 SMALL ANIMAL LAB 150 KY CLINIC DR $798,600 0010 HAMILTON HOUSE - UK 342 S LIMESTONE $795,300 0450 SOFTBALL MAINTENANCE 560 WILDCAT CT $766,700

Page 329: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

329

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

REPL

ACEM

ENT

COST

0451 SOCCERFIELD COMPLEX 550 WILDCAT CT $735,900 0451 SOCCERFIELD COMPLEX 550 WILDCAT CT $735,900 0417 LEARNING SERVICES CENTER 660 SOUTH LIMESTONE ST $732,600 0381 3-UNIT APT BUILDING 162-164 GAZETTE AVE $715,000 0452 SOFTBALL COMPLEX 570 WILDCAT CT $709,500 0442 LIGON HOUSE 658 SOUTH LLIMESTONE STREET $694,100 0156 GREENHOUSE #4 150 HOSPITAL DR $625,900 0157 GREENHOUSE #7 150 HOSPITAL DR $622,600 0159 GREENHOUSE #3 150 HOSPITAL DR $622,600 0160 GREENHOUSE #1 150 HOSPITAL DR $622,600 0158 GREENHOUSE #5 150 HOSPITAL DR $618,200 0155 GREENHOUSE #2 150 HOSPITAL DR $587,400 0094 COOPER HOUSE 1312 NICHOLASVILLE RD $558,800 0402 SCHOOL FOUR MUSIC AC OFC 111 WASHINGTON AVE 147 WASHINGTON AVE $521,400 0420 CHILD DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH CENTER 424 EUCLID AVE $514,800 0288 GREENHOUSE & LAB 455 STADIUM VIEW DR $491,700 0401 WELDON HOUSE 635 MAXWELTON CT $486,200 0164 HORTICULTURE GREENHOUSE 150 HOSPITAL DR $467,500 0021 ENG RES/SCHOOL OF MUSIC 421 ROSE ST $446,600 0060 RESEARCH & DEV CTR 149 WASHINGTON AV $446,600 0322 417 COLUMBIA AVE $446,600 0350 CENTER FOR DRUG & ALCOHOL RESEARCH 643 MAXWELTON CT $419,100 0227 RECREATION EQ BLDG 454 COMPLEX DR $415,800 0020 GARAGE ENG TRANSPORTATION 533 S LIMESTONE $390,500

Page 330: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

330

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

REPL

ACEM

ENT

COST

0214 FLAMMABLE STORAGE BLDG 148 GRAHAM AVE $380,600 0347 OFFICES 624 MAXWELTON CT $339,900 0585 BASEBALL TRAINING PAVILLION 702 SPORTS CENTER DR $335,500 0351 JEFF HARRIS PSYCH SER CTR 644 MAXWELTON CT $334,400 0349 FACULTY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT 641 MAXWELTON CT $330,000 0348 RESIDENCE-UK 626 MAXWELTON CT $326,700 0510 456 ROSE LANE - RENTAL 456 ROSE LN $322,300 0400 ELLEN H RICHARDS HS 630 MAXWELTON CT $317,900 0278 PPD STORAGE BLDG 425 STADIUM VIEW DR $311,300 0482 RESIDENCE-UK 408 LINDEN WALK $283,800 0363 RESIDENCE-UK 406 PENNSYLVANIA CT $257,400 0346 RESIDENCE - UK 654 MAXWELTON CT $232,100 0428 2 RENTAL UNITS - UK 457 WOODLAND AVE $232,100 0616 SEATON CENTER STORAGE 1214 UNIVERSITY DR $202,400 0114 TRACK STORAGE BLDG 698 SPORTS CENTER DR $201,300 0365 RESIDENCE W/DETCH GARAGE 410 PENNSYLVANIA CT $201,300 0211 MAXWELL PLACE GARAGE 475 ROSE ST $195,800 0301 RENTAL PROPERTIES 154 BONNIE BRAE DR $195,800 0268 FOOD STORE LAUNDRY 300 ALUMNI DR STE 213 $191,951 0489 MEDICAL CENTER OFFICE 1117 S LIMESTONE $183,700 0487 UK-RENTAL PROPERTY 518 OLDHAM CT $174,900 0177 RESIDENCE MOTOR POOL 1505 COLLEGE WAY $167,200 0362 RESIDENCE-UK 405 PENNSYLVANIA CT $150,700 0377 STUDENT HOUSING - UK 319 ROSE LN $148,500

Page 331: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

331

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

REPL

ACEM

ENT

COST

0378 STUDENT HOUSING - UK 321 ROSE LN $148,500 0210 REYNOLDS WAREHOUSE #4 355 SCOTT AVE $139,700 0473 RESIDENCE 505 OLDHAM CT $135,300 0353 OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 520 OLDHAM CT $134,200 0412 403 PENNSYLVANIA CT 403 PENNSYLVANIA CT $133,100 0386 150 GAZETTE AVENUE 150 GAZETTE AVE $132,000 0287 ELECTRIC HVAC BLDG 425 STADIUM VIEW DR $128,700 0361 RESIDENCE-UK 402 PENNSYLVANIA CT $128,700 0449 SHIVELY GROUNDS STORAGE BLDG 712 SPORTS CENTER DR $127,600 0460 CENTER ON DRUG & ALCOHOL RESEARCH 149 TRANSCRIPT AVE $125,400 0453 SHIVELY GROUNDS BLDG 712 SPORTS CENTER DR $119,900 0337 5-CAR GARAGE 663 S LIMESTONE $105,600 0282 GAS STORAGE BLDG M & M 540 ROSE ST $99,000 0118 FRATERNITIES HOUSE STG 460 HILLTOP AVE $82,500 0461 UK MED CTR 153 TRANSCRIPT AVE $82,500 0467 220 TRANSCRIPT AVE 220 TRANSCRIPT AVE $77,000 0183 ISOLATION BARN 1529 COLLEGE WAY $73,700 0231 FARM MAINT STORAGE SHED 1521 COLLEGE WAY $70,400 0182 ISOLATION BARN/INCINERATOR 1525 COLLEGE WAY $67,100 0110 MAINTENANCE BLDG-ATHLETIC 700 SPORTS CENTER DR $40,700 0272 INFORMATION BUILDING 1540 UNIVERSITY DRIVE $38,500 0300 ARBORETUM TOOL SHED 500 ARBORETUM WAY $28,600 0185 CARPORT FOR BLDG. 177 1505 COLLEGE WAY $22,000 0279 MAT STORAGE BLDG 460 STADIUM VIEW DR $16,500

Page 332: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

332

BUIL

DING

NUM

BER

BUIL

DING

NAM

E

ADDR

ESS

REPL

ACEM

ENT

COST

0600 ELIZABETHTOWN CC LIBRARY 600 COLLEGE STREET RD $14,740 0511 RENTAL/DWELLING 456 ROSE LN $14,300 0289 HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE 475 STADIUM VIEW DR $12,100 0484 518 OLDHAM CT. GARAGE 518 OLDHAM CT $2,200

Page 333: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

333

Appendix 16: Sample Mitigation Action Form and Handouts

UK Hazard Mitigation Action Form

Please fill out to the best of your knowledge the below form for any project that is ongoing, completed, or for a hazard mitigation project that you would like to implement in the future. Use one form for each project.

University of Kentucky: Project/Action Report Date: 10 Nov.08 Department/Unit: Student Affairs

Contact Name: Larry crouch

Contact Title: Asst. to Vice President Student Affairs & Development Director

Telephone Number: 257-5216 E-Mail Address: [email protected] Facsimile Number: 323- 1067 Topics To Cover: • Please list any hazard mitigation projects/actions that your department has funded,

implemented or would be interested in implementing.

***Please note that Dana Walton-Macaulay of our Residence Life Office is submitting a list of projects under separate cover that Student Affairs would be interested in implementing.

(Project1) Established procedures and guidance on assembling and coordinating actions of the Student Affairs Cabinet ( SAM Team) in order to help manage various hazardous elements that might affect our students and the campus community.

(Project2) Train housing staff and resident advisors ( RA’s) to respond to campus emergency hazards.

( Project 3) Train Campus Recreation staff to respond to campus natural hazards.

• Who is/would be the Lead Department and Contact Person/Project Manager for this mitigation project?

(1)Larry Crouch—Student Affairs

(2) Dana Walton-Macaulay—Residence Life

(3) Cathy Rose—Campus Recreation

Page 334: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

334

• Are there other departments or organizations involved with implementing this project? If yes, please list:

(1) All of Student Affairs in cooperation UK PD and Emergency Management ( Christy Giles) (2) The Housing Office is also involved. (3) Campus Recreation primarily

Topics To Cover: • What natural hazard(s) does/would this project address? (Tornado, Flood, Severe Storm,

Severe Winter Storm, Hailstorm, Drought, Earthquake, Extreme Heat, Karst/Sinkhole, Mine Subsidence, Landslide, and Wildfire)

(1) The team could be assembled to help with most of the about hazards. (2) The Resident Life Housing Directors/staff and RAs could respond to most of the above,

particularly the first eight hazards. (3) The Campus Recreation staff could respond to most of the above, particularly the first

eight hazards mentioned above.

• What is/will be the project location?

(1)The location would be the Vice President for Student Affairs Office , Frazee Hall or

The Dean of Students Office, 545 POT

(2)The location would be the Office of Residence Life, POT 537

(3) Campus Recreation, 177 Johnson Center

Page 335: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

335

• Please identify funding sources for this project. (i.e. state, federal, university) If multiple sources are used please list all by percentage if possible.

( 1) The Division of Student affairs has funded this and purchased the police radios that can be used in support.

(2)The Office of Residence Life/VPSA, funds this training.

(3) The Campus Recreation Dept. funds this training.

• What is the total/estimated cost of this project?

(1) The costs were about $ 3,000 for the radio system. (2) This training is a part of the Residence Life overall training budget and no real figure

has been assigned. (3) Same as (2) above.

• Is this project ongoing or one time?

( 1)It is ongoing and the Cabinet ( SAM Team) is prepared to respond when needed.

(2)It is ongoing and it is provided at the beginning of each semester.

(3)It is ongoing throughout the year.

• What is the purpose of this project and how does it mitigate/reduce/eliminate the risks of natural hazards for the University?

Page 336: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

336

(1) It brings our team of senior administrators together to help mitigate and reduce the effects of various disasters.

(2) This training helps prepare the Resident Life staff to function as first line responders and to help to mitigate the natural disasters noted previously.

(3) This training help the Campus Recreation staff to function as first responders and to help mitigate the effect of the natural disasters note above.

• What is the proposed timeline for project completion?

(1)It is on going at present and will continue to be responsive.

(2) Same as above

(3) Same as above

• Additional Comments:

***Please note that Dana Walton-Macaulay of our Residence Life Office is submitting a list

of projects under separate cover that Student Affairs would be interested in implementing.

Page 337: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

337

Possible Mitigation Action Strategy Examples:

Hazard Type of Action or Project Mitigation Category

Lead Department/Contact Person

Proposed Schedule

Funding/Budget Considerations

All Hazards Develop a Campus CERT Team

Public Information and awareness ? 3-5 years Internal

All Hazards Assign a member of UK steering committee to other hazard work groups like the State and LFUCG Hazard committee's

Public Information and awareness ? On-going None

All Hazards Develop a Hazard Mitigation Website Public Information and awareness ? 1-2 years Unidentified

All Hazards

Identify and encourage the incorporation of available hazard mitigation education and outreach programs/products into school education programs.

Public Information and awareness ? 1-2 years Unidentified

All Hazards Assess the structural condition of all buildings owned by the University Prevention ? 3-5 years Unidentified

Severe Storm/Lighting Evaluate and provide lightning protection for all buildings Property Protection ? On-going Grant funding

All Hazards Provide adequate emergency power generators for critical facilities Emergency Services ? 3-5 years $2 million

All Hazards Ensure backup systems are appropriate ? On-going $5 million

All Hazards As renovations occur ensure that the building codes are to university standards. Property Protection ? On-going Dependent on Project

All Hazards Continue reviewing building codes as new construction occurs. Property Protection ? On-going Dependent on Project

All Hazards Annual review of University Hazard Plan and risk assessment data

Public Information and awareness ? On-going Internal

Page 338: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

338

Mitigation Action Categories and Techniques

The below mitigation categories and techniques are examples that may be helpful in order to identify past, present, and future mitigation actions for the University of Kentucky. Natural Hazards to be Examined: Dam Failure Drought Extreme Heat Flood Hailstorm Karst/Sinkhole Mine Subsidence Landslide Winter Storm Tornado Severe Storm Earthquake Mitigation Categories: Prevention Preventative activities are intended to keep hazard problems from getting worse. They are particularly effective in reducing a university’s future vulnerability, especially in areas where capital improvements have not been substantial. Examples of preventative activities include: Planning for Land Use Open space preservation Floodplain regulations Stormwater mgt

Drainage system maintenance

Capital Improvements Programming

Riverine/fault zone setbacks

Property Protection Property protection measures protect existing structures by modifying the building to withstand hazardous events, or removing structures from hazardous locations. Examples include: Acquisition Relocation

Building elevation Insurance

Retrofitting (i.e., windproofing, floodproofing, seismic design standards, etc.)

Critical facilities protection

Safe rooms

Public Information and Awareness Public Information and awareness activities are used to advise students, faculty, campus residents, and visitors about hazards, hazardous areas, and mitigation techniques they can use to protect themselves and their property. Examples of measures to educate and inform the university public include: Outreach projects Library materials

Speaker series / demonstration events

School children education

Hazard map information Hazard expositions

Research/Lab materials

Natural Resource Protection Natural resource protection activities reduce the impact of natural hazards by preserving or restoring natural areas and their mitigative functions. Such areas include floodplains, wetlands and dunes. Parks, recreation or conservation agencies and organizations often implement these measures. Examples include:

Floodplain protection

Erosion and sediment control

Riparian buffers Habitat preservation

Fire resistant landscaping Wetland preservation and restoration

Fuel Breaks Slope stabilization

Emergency Services Although not typically considered a “mitigation technique,” emergency service measures do minimize the impact of a hazard event on people and property. These commonly are actions taken immediately prior to, during, or in response to a hazard event. Examples include: Warning systems Sandbagging for flood

protection Evacuation planning and management

Installing shutters for wind protection

Structural Projects Structural mitigation projects are intended to lessen the impact of a hazard by modifying the environmental natural progression of the hazard event. They are usually designed by engineers and managed or maintained by university or public works staff. Examples include: Reservoirs Erosion and sediment

control Levees / dikes / floodwalls Diversions / Detention /

Retention

Channel modification

Storm sewers

Page 339: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

339

Appendix 17: Annual Summary Report

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan Mitigation Strategy

Annual Summary Report Date: Subject: Annual Report Status of Mitigation Projects This annual report is prepared to inform university officials of the progress to date in making our community disaster-resistant. The following tables briefly summarize the types of information needed to report the status of Existing Projects and identify New Projects expected to be undertaken in the upcoming year. EXISTING PROJECTS Project Title Purpose of Project Status of Completion Obstacles/Problems/Solutions

NEW PROJECTS Project Title Purpose of

Project Funding Source(s) Anticipated

Problems/ Solutions

Start/End Dates

Page 340: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

340

Appendix 18: Progress Report

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan Mitigation Strategy

Individual Project Progress Report

Date: Subject: Annual Report Status of Mitigation Projects Project Title: Status of Project:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Problems/Obstacles & Proposed Corrective Action: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Name of Reporter: Email Address: Telephone #: Send to: UK Office of Emergency Management 520 Oldham Court Lexington, KY 40502 [email protected] 859/257-4143 (fax)

Page 341: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN · 2016-08-11 · Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000provided new and ... UK’s approach to creating a Hazard Mitigation Plan, ... evaluates,

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan

341

Appendix 19: Amendment Form

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan Amendment Form

Amendment Sponsor:______________________ Amendment #:____________________________ Date:___________________________________ Current Text _________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Section:________ Page_______ Line______ Amended Text _________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Section:________ Page_______ Line______ Purpose of Amendment: _________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________