-
University of Groningen
Dimensionality assesment with factor analysis methodsBarendse,
Mariska
IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's
version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite fromit. Please check
the document version below.
Document VersionPublisher's PDF, also known as Version of
record
Publication date:2015
Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research
database
Citation for published version (APA):Barendse, M. (2015).
Dimensionality assesment with factor analysis methods. [S.n.].
CopyrightOther than for strictly personal use, it is not
permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of
it without the consent of theauthor(s) and/or copyright holder(s),
unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative
Commons).
Take-down policyIf you believe that this document breaches
copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove
access to the work immediatelyand investigate your claim.
Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research
database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical
reasons thenumber of authors shown on this cover page is limited to
10 maximum.
Download date: 06-04-2021
https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/dimensionality-assesment-with-factor-analysis-methods(16a8c55b-1c6d-4465-a5e0-267480751fe4).html
-
161160
exploratory methods such as non–parametric item response theory
(IRT)
models. It would also be interesting to compare the nonlinear
models
presented in Chapters 5 and 6 with the IRT models as presented
by
Molenaar (2012), who tested nonnormality (including interaction
effects).
In addition, one could compare the multilevel models studied in
Chapter
3 with the Bayesian or frequentist IRT oriented multilevel
models (e.g.,
Verhagen, 2012).
161
Bibliography
Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical Data Analysis. New York:
Wiley-Interscience.
Agresti, A. & Yang, M.-C. (1987). An empirical investigation
of some effects ofsparseness in contingency tables. Computational
Statistics & Data Analysis,5 (1), 9–21.
Asparouhov, T. & Muthén, B. O. (2006). Robust chi square
difference testingwith mean and variance adjusted test statistics.
Mplus Web Notes: No. 10.Retrieved from
http://www.statmodel.com/download/webnotes/webnote10.pdf.
Asparouhov, T. & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Computationally
efficient estimationof multilevel high-dimensional latent variable
models. In Proceedings ofthe 2007 JSM meeting in Salt Lake City,
Utah, Section on Statistics inEpidemiology, (pp. 2531–2535).
Asparouhov, T. & Muthén, B. O. (2010a). Computing the
strictly positiveSatorra-Bentler chi–square test in Mplus. Mplus
Web Notes: No. 12. Re-trieved from
http://www.statmodel.com/download/webnotes/webnote12.pdf.
Asparouhov, T. & Muthén, B. O. (2010b). Simple second order
chi-square cor-rection. Mplus Technical Appendix. Retrieved from
http://www. statmodel.com/download/WLSMV new chi21. pdf.
Barendse, M. T., Oort, F. J., & Garst, G. J. A. (2010).
Using restricted factoranalysis with latent moderated structures to
detect uniform and nonuniformmeasurement bias; a simulation study.
Advances in Statistical Analysis,94 (2), 117–127.
Barendse, M. T., Oort, F. J., & Timmerman, M. E. (2014).
Using exploratoryfactor analysis to determine the dimensionality of
discrete responses. Struc-tural Equation Modeling: A
Multidisciplinary Journal, (ahead-of-print), 1–15.
Barendse, M. T., Oort, F. J., Werner, C. S., Ligtvoet, R., &
Schermelleh-Engel,K. (2012). Measurement bias detection through
factor analysis. StructuralEquation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary
Journal, 19 (4), 561–579.
-
162 162
Bartholomew, D. J. & Leung, S. O. (2002). A goodness of fit
test for sparse2p contingency tables. British Journal of
Mathematical and Statistical Psy-chology, 55 (1), 1–15.
Beauducel, A. (2001). On the generalizability of factors: The
influence ofchanging contexts of variables on different methods of
factor extraction.Methods of Psychological Research Online, 6 (1),
69–96.
Beauducel, A. & Herzberg, P. Y. (2006). On the performance
of maximumlikelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted
least squares esti-mation in cfa. Structural Equation Modeling: A
Multidisciplinary Journal,13 (2), 186–203.
Bohrnstedt, G. W. & Goldberger, A. S. (1969). On the exact
covariance ofproducts of random variables. Journal of the American
Statistical Associa-tion, 64 (328), 1439–1442.
Boker, S., Neale, M., Maes, H., Wilde, M., Spiegel, M., Brick,
T., Spies, J.,Estabrook, R., Kenny, S., Bates, T., et al. (2011).
OpenMx: An open sourceextended structural equation modeling
framework. Psychometrika, 76 (2),306–317.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent
Variables. New York:John Wiley & Sons.
Boulton, A. J. (2011). Fit Index Sensitivity in Multilevel
Structural EquationModeling. PhD thesis, Docteral dissertation
Kansas, University of Kansas.
Briggs, N. E. & MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Recovery of weak
common factorsby maximum likelihood and ordinary least squares
estimation. MultivariateBehavioral Research, 38 (1), 25–56.
Browne, M. W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution–free methods
for the anal-ysis of covariance structures. British Journal of
Mathematical and StatisticalPsychology, 37 (1), 62–83.
Browne, M. W. (1995). Covariance structures. In Topics in
Applied Multi-variate Analysis, (pp. 72–141). ID M. Hawkins.
Cambridge, UK: CambridgeUniversity.
Browne, M. W. (2001). An overview of analytic rotation in
exploratory factoranalysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36
(1), 111–150.
Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of
assessing model fit.Sociological Methods & Research, 21 (2),
230–258.
-
163162
Bartholomew, D. J. & Leung, S. O. (2002). A goodness of fit
test for sparse2p contingency tables. British Journal of
Mathematical and Statistical Psy-chology, 55 (1), 1–15.
Beauducel, A. (2001). On the generalizability of factors: The
influence ofchanging contexts of variables on different methods of
factor extraction.Methods of Psychological Research Online, 6 (1),
69–96.
Beauducel, A. & Herzberg, P. Y. (2006). On the performance
of maximumlikelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted
least squares esti-mation in cfa. Structural Equation Modeling: A
Multidisciplinary Journal,13 (2), 186–203.
Bohrnstedt, G. W. & Goldberger, A. S. (1969). On the exact
covariance ofproducts of random variables. Journal of the American
Statistical Associa-tion, 64 (328), 1439–1442.
Boker, S., Neale, M., Maes, H., Wilde, M., Spiegel, M., Brick,
T., Spies, J.,Estabrook, R., Kenny, S., Bates, T., et al. (2011).
OpenMx: An open sourceextended structural equation modeling
framework. Psychometrika, 76 (2),306–317.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent
Variables. New York:John Wiley & Sons.
Boulton, A. J. (2011). Fit Index Sensitivity in Multilevel
Structural EquationModeling. PhD thesis, Docteral dissertation
Kansas, University of Kansas.
Briggs, N. E. & MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Recovery of weak
common factorsby maximum likelihood and ordinary least squares
estimation. MultivariateBehavioral Research, 38 (1), 25–56.
Browne, M. W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution–free methods
for the anal-ysis of covariance structures. British Journal of
Mathematical and StatisticalPsychology, 37 (1), 62–83.
Browne, M. W. (1995). Covariance structures. In Topics in
Applied Multi-variate Analysis, (pp. 72–141). ID M. Hawkins.
Cambridge, UK: CambridgeUniversity.
Browne, M. W. (2001). An overview of analytic rotation in
exploratory factoranalysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36
(1), 111–150.
Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of
assessing model fit.Sociological Methods & Research, 21 (2),
230–258.
163
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral
Sciences. Hills-dale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Conway, J. M. & Huffcutt, A. I. (2003). A review and
evaluation of exploratoryfactor analysis practices in
organizational research. Organizational ResearchMethods, 6 (2),
147–168.
D’Haenens, E., Van Damme, J., & Onghena, P. (2010).
Multilevel exploratoryfactor analysis: illustrating its surplus
value in educational effectivenessresearch. School Effectiveness
and School Improvement, 21 (2), 209–235.
Dolan, C. V. (1994). Factor analysis of variables with 2, 3, 5
and 7 responsecategories: A comparison of categorical variable
estimators using simulateddata. British Journal of Mathematical and
Statistical Psychology, 47 (2),309–326.
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., &
Strahan, E. J. (1999).Evaluating the use of exploratory factor
analysis in psychological research.Psychological Methods, 4 (3),
272–299.
Flora, D. B. & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation
of alternativemethods of estimation for confirmatory factor
analysis with ordinal data.Psychological Methods, 9 (4),
466–491.
Gaskin, C. J. & Happell, B. (2014). On exploratory factor
analysis: A reviewof recent evidence, an assessment of current
practice, and recommendationsfor future use. International Journal
of Nursing Studies, 51 (3), 511–521.
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B.
(2013). BayesianData Analysis. Texts in statistical science series.
London, United Kingkom:Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Gelman, A. & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Inference from iterative
simulation usingmultiple sequences. Statistical Science,
457–472.
Geweke, J. (1992). Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based
approaches tothe calculation of posterior moments. In Bayesian
Statistics, (pp. 169–193).JM Bernardo, JO Berger, AP Dawid, AFM
Smith (Eds.) University Press.
Gonzalez-Roma, V., Hernandez, A., & Gomez-Benito, J. (2006).
Power andtype i error of the mean and covariance structure analysis
model for de-tecting differential item functioning in graded
response items. MultivariateBehavioral Research, 41 (1), 29–53.
Hayashi, K., Bentler, P. M., & Yuan, K.-H. (2007). On the
likelihood ratio testfor the number of factors in exploratory
factor analysis. Structural EquationModeling: A Multidisciplinary
Journal, 14 (3), 505–526.
-
164 164
Hernández, A. & González-Romá, V. (2003). Evaluating the
multiple-groupmean and covariance structure analysis model for the
detection of differentialitem functioning in polytomous ordered
items. Psicothema, 15 (2), 322–327.
Holgado-Tello, F. P., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Barbero-Garćıa, I.,
& Vila-Abad,E. (2010). Polychoric versus pearson correlations
in exploratory and con-firmatory factor analysis of ordinal
variables. Quality & Quantity, 44 (1),153–166.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural
equation mod-elling: Guidelines for determining model fit.
Electronic Journal of BusinessResearch Methods, 6 (1), 53–60.
Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit
indexes in covariancestructure analysis: Conventional criteria
versus new alternatives. StructuralEquation Modeling: A
Multidisciplinary Journal, 6 (1), 1–55.
Jak, S., Oort, F. J., & Dolan, C. V. (2010). Measurement
bias and multidimen-sionality; an illustration of bias detection in
multidimensional measurementmodels. Advances in Statistical
Analysis, 94 (2), 129–137.
Jak, S., Oort, F. J., & Dolan, C. V. (2013). A test for
cluster bias: Detect-ing violations of measurement invariance
across clusters in multilevel data.Structural Equation Modeling: A
Multidisciplinary Journal, 20 (2), 265–282.
Jak, S., Oort, F. J., & Dolan, C. V. (2014). Measurement
bias in multileveldata. Structural Equation Modeling: A
Multidisciplinary Journal, 21 (1),31–39.
Johnson, D. R. & Creech, J. C. (1983). Ordinal measures in
multiple indicatormodels: A simulation study of categorization
error. American SociologicalReview, 48 (3), 398–407.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1990). New developments in LISREL: Analysis of
ordinalvariables using polychoric correlations and weighted least
squares. Quality& Quantity, 24 (4), 387–404.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1994). On the estimation of polychoric
correlations and theirasymptotic covariance matrix. Psychometrika,
59 (3), 381–389.
Jöreskog, K. G. & Moustaki, I. (2001). Factor analysis of
ordinal variables: Acomparison of three approaches. Multivariate
Behavioral Research,, 36 (3),347–387.
Katsikatsou, M., Moustaki, I., Yang-Wallentin, F., &
Jöreskog, K. G. (2012).Pairwise likelihood estimation for factor
analysis models with ordinal data.Computational Statistics &
Data Analysis, 56 (12), 4243–4258.
-
165164
Hernández, A. & González-Romá, V. (2003). Evaluating the
multiple-groupmean and covariance structure analysis model for the
detection of differentialitem functioning in polytomous ordered
items. Psicothema, 15 (2), 322–327.
Holgado-Tello, F. P., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Barbero-Garćıa, I.,
& Vila-Abad,E. (2010). Polychoric versus pearson correlations
in exploratory and con-firmatory factor analysis of ordinal
variables. Quality & Quantity, 44 (1),153–166.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural
equation mod-elling: Guidelines for determining model fit.
Electronic Journal of BusinessResearch Methods, 6 (1), 53–60.
Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit
indexes in covariancestructure analysis: Conventional criteria
versus new alternatives. StructuralEquation Modeling: A
Multidisciplinary Journal, 6 (1), 1–55.
Jak, S., Oort, F. J., & Dolan, C. V. (2010). Measurement
bias and multidimen-sionality; an illustration of bias detection in
multidimensional measurementmodels. Advances in Statistical
Analysis, 94 (2), 129–137.
Jak, S., Oort, F. J., & Dolan, C. V. (2013). A test for
cluster bias: Detect-ing violations of measurement invariance
across clusters in multilevel data.Structural Equation Modeling: A
Multidisciplinary Journal, 20 (2), 265–282.
Jak, S., Oort, F. J., & Dolan, C. V. (2014). Measurement
bias in multileveldata. Structural Equation Modeling: A
Multidisciplinary Journal, 21 (1),31–39.
Johnson, D. R. & Creech, J. C. (1983). Ordinal measures in
multiple indicatormodels: A simulation study of categorization
error. American SociologicalReview, 48 (3), 398–407.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1990). New developments in LISREL: Analysis of
ordinalvariables using polychoric correlations and weighted least
squares. Quality& Quantity, 24 (4), 387–404.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1994). On the estimation of polychoric
correlations and theirasymptotic covariance matrix. Psychometrika,
59 (3), 381–389.
Jöreskog, K. G. & Moustaki, I. (2001). Factor analysis of
ordinal variables: Acomparison of three approaches. Multivariate
Behavioral Research,, 36 (3),347–387.
Katsikatsou, M., Moustaki, I., Yang-Wallentin, F., &
Jöreskog, K. G. (2012).Pairwise likelihood estimation for factor
analysis models with ordinal data.Computational Statistics &
Data Analysis, 56 (12), 4243–4258.
165
Klein, A. G. (2007). Quasi–ML 3.10–quick reference manual.
UnpublishedPaper, The University of Western Ontario.
Klein, A. G. & Moosbrugger, H. (2000). Maximum likelihood
estimation oflatent interaction effects with the LMS method.
Psychometrika, 65 (4), 457–474.
Klein, A. G. & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Quasi–maximum
likelihood estimation ofstructural equation models with multiple
interaction and quadratic effects.Multivariate Behavioral Research,
42 (4), 647–673.
Lee, S.-Y. (2007). Structural Equation Modeling: A Bayesian
Approach. Chich-ester, United Kingkom: John Wiley & Sons.
Lee, S.-Y., Poon, W.-Y., & Bentler, P. (1990). Full maximum
likelihood anal-ysis of structural equation models with polytomous
variables. Statistics &Probability Letters, 9 (1), 91–97.
Lee, S.-Y. & Song, X.-Y. (2012). Basic and Advanced Bayesian
StructuralEquation Modeling: With Applications in the Medical and
Behavioral Sci-ences. Chichester, United Kingkom: John Wiley &
Sons.
Lord, F. & Novick, M. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental
Test Scores.Oxford, England: Addison-Wesley.
Lunn, D., Spiegelhalter, D., Thomas, A., & Best, N. (2009).
The BUGSproject: Evolution, critique and future directions.
Statistics in Medicine,28 (25), 3049–3067.
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996).
Power anal-ysis and determination of sample size for covariance
structure modeling.Psychological Methods, 1 (2), 130.
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Preacher, K. J., & Hong,
S. (2001). Sam-ple size in factor analysis: The role of model
error. Multivariate BehavioralResearch, 36 (4), 611–637.
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S.
(1999). Samplesize in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4
(1), 84.
MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D.
D. (2002). On thepractice of dichotomization of quantitative
variables. Psychological Methods,7 (1), 19–40.
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of
golden rules:Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting
cutoff values for fitindexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and
Bentler’s (1999) findings.Structural Equation Modeling: A
Multidisciplinary Journal, 11 (3), 320–341.
-
166 166
Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2006). Limited information estimation and
testing ofdiscretized multivariate normal structural models.
Psychometrika, 71 (1),57–77.
Maydeu-Olivares, A. & Joe, H. (2006). Limited information
goodness-of-fittesting in multidimensional contingency tables.
Psychometrika, 71 (4), 713–732.
Meade, A. W. & Lautenschlager, G. J. (2004). A monte-carlo
study of confir-matory factor analytic tests of measurement
equivalence/invariance. Struc-tural Equation Modeling: A
Multidisciplinary Journal, 11 (1), 60–72.
Mellenbergh, G. J. (1989). Item bias and item response theory.
InternationalJournal of Educational Research, 13 (2), 127–143.
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and
factorialinvariance. Psychometrika, 58 (4), 525–543.
Molenaar, D. (2012). Testing distributional assumptions in
psychometric mea-surement models with substantive applications in
psychology. PhD thesis,Docteral dissertation Amsterdam, University
of Amsterdam.
Moosbrugger, H., Schermelleh-Engel, K., Kelava, A., & Klein,
A. G. (2009).Testing multiple nonlinear effects in structural
equation modeling: A com-parison of alternative estimation
approaches. In Structural equation model-ing in educational
research: Concepts and applications, (pp. 103–136).
SensePublishers, Rotterdam.
Moustaki, I. (2003). A general class of latent variable models
for ordinalmanifest variables with covariate effects on the
manifest and latent variables.British Journal of Mathematical and
Statistical Psychology, 56 (2), 337–357.
MRC Biostatistics Unit (2006). Dic: Deviance Information
Criterion.http://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/software/bugs/the-bugs-project-dic/.
Ap-proached at 30 July 2014.
Muthén, B. O. (1984). A general structural equation model with
dichotomous,ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable
indicators. Psychome-trika, 49 (1), 115–132.
Muthén, B. O. (1989a). Latent variable modeling in
heterogeneous popula-tions. Psychometrika, 54 (4), 557–585.
Muthén, B. O. (1989b). Multiple-group structural modelling with
non-normalcontinuous variables. British Journal of Mathematical and
Statistical Psy-chology, 42 (1), 55–62.
-
167166
Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2006). Limited information estimation and
testing ofdiscretized multivariate normal structural models.
Psychometrika, 71 (1),57–77.
Maydeu-Olivares, A. & Joe, H. (2006). Limited information
goodness-of-fittesting in multidimensional contingency tables.
Psychometrika, 71 (4), 713–732.
Meade, A. W. & Lautenschlager, G. J. (2004). A monte-carlo
study of confir-matory factor analytic tests of measurement
equivalence/invariance. Struc-tural Equation Modeling: A
Multidisciplinary Journal, 11 (1), 60–72.
Mellenbergh, G. J. (1989). Item bias and item response theory.
InternationalJournal of Educational Research, 13 (2), 127–143.
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and
factorialinvariance. Psychometrika, 58 (4), 525–543.
Molenaar, D. (2012). Testing distributional assumptions in
psychometric mea-surement models with substantive applications in
psychology. PhD thesis,Docteral dissertation Amsterdam, University
of Amsterdam.
Moosbrugger, H., Schermelleh-Engel, K., Kelava, A., & Klein,
A. G. (2009).Testing multiple nonlinear effects in structural
equation modeling: A com-parison of alternative estimation
approaches. In Structural equation model-ing in educational
research: Concepts and applications, (pp. 103–136).
SensePublishers, Rotterdam.
Moustaki, I. (2003). A general class of latent variable models
for ordinalmanifest variables with covariate effects on the
manifest and latent variables.British Journal of Mathematical and
Statistical Psychology, 56 (2), 337–357.
MRC Biostatistics Unit (2006). Dic: Deviance Information
Criterion.http://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/software/bugs/the-bugs-project-dic/.
Ap-proached at 30 July 2014.
Muthén, B. O. (1984). A general structural equation model with
dichotomous,ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable
indicators. Psychome-trika, 49 (1), 115–132.
Muthén, B. O. (1989a). Latent variable modeling in
heterogeneous popula-tions. Psychometrika, 54 (4), 557–585.
Muthén, B. O. (1989b). Multiple-group structural modelling with
non-normalcontinuous variables. British Journal of Mathematical and
Statistical Psy-chology, 42 (1), 55–62.
167
Muthén, B. O. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis.
SociologicalMethods & Research, 22 (3), 376–398.
Muthén, B. O. (1998-2004). Mplus technical appendices.
Unpublished technicalreport. Retrieved from
https://www.statmodel.com/download/techappen.pdf.
Muthén, B. O. & Asparouhov, T. (2003). Modeling
interactions be-tween latent and observed continuous variables
using maximum-likelihoodestimation in Mplus. Mplus Web Notes: No.
6. Retrieved
fromhttp://statmodel2.com/download/webnotes/webnote6.pdf.
Muthén, B. O. & Asparouhov, T. (2012). Bayesian structural
equation mod-eling: a more flexible representation of substantive
theory. PsychologicalMethods, 17 (3), 313.
Muthén, B. O. & Asparouhov, T. (2013). BSEM measurement
in-variance analysis. Mplus Web Notes: No. 6. Retrieved
fromhttps://www.statmodel.com/examples/webnotes/webnote17.pdf.
Muthén, B. O., Du Toit, S. H., & Spisic, D. (1997). Robust
inference usingweighted least squares and quadratic estimating
equations in latent variablemodeling with categorical and
continuous outcomes. Unpublished technicalreport. Retrieved
fromhttp://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/muthen/articles/Article
075.pdf.
Muthén, B. O. & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some
methodologiesfor the factor analysis of non-normal likert
variables. British Journal ofMathematical and Statistical
Psychology, 38 (2), 171–189.
Muthén, B. O. & Kaplan, D. (1992). A comparison of some
methodologies forthe factor analysis of non-normal likert
variables: A note on the size of themodel. British Journal of
Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45 (1),19–30.
Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus: Statistical
analysis with latentvariables: User’s guide. Muthén &
Muthén.
Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus: Statistical
analysis with latentvariables: User’s guide. Muthén &
Muthén.
Navas-Ara, M. J. & Gómez-Benito, J. (2002). Effects of
ability scale pu-rification on the identification of DIF. European
Journal of PsychologicalAssessment, 18 (1), 9.
Neale, M. C., Boker, S. M., Xie, G., & Maes, H. H. (2002).
Mx: Statisticalmodeling. Richmond: Virginia Commonwealth
University, Department ofPsychiatry.
-
168 168
Olsson, U. (1979). Maximum likelihood estimation of the
polychoric correlationcoefficient. Psychometrika, 44 (4),
443–460.
Olsson, U. H., Foss, T., & Breivik, E. (2004). Two
equivalent discrepancyfunctions for maximum likelihood estimation:
Do their test statistics followa non-central chi-square
distribution under model misspecification? Socio-logical Methods
& Research, 32 (4), 453–500.
Olsson, U. H., Troye, S. V., & Howell, R. D. (1999).
Theoretic fit and empiricalfit: The performance of maximum
likelihood versus generalized least squaresestimation in structural
equation models. Multivariate Behavioral Research,34 (1),
31–58.
Oort, F. J. (1991). Theory of violators: Assessing
unidimensionality of psycho-logical measures. In W. K. F. Steyer,
R. & W. K. F. (Eds.), Psychometricmethodology (pp. 377–381).
Stuttgart, Germany: Gustav Fischer.
Oort, F. J. (1992). Using restricted factor analysis to detect
item bias.Methodika, 6, 150–166.
Oort, F. J. (1996). Using Restricted Factor Analysis in Test
Construction.PhD thesis, Docteral dissertation Amsterdam,
University of Amsterdam.
Oort, F. J. (1998). Simulation study of item bias detection with
restrictedfactor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A
Multidisciplinary Journal,5 (2), 107–124.
Oort, F. J. (2011). Likelihood-based confidence intervals in
exploratory factoranalysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A
Multidisciplinary Journal, 18 (3),383–396.
Plummer, M., Best, N., Cowles, K., & Vines, K. (2006). CODA:
Convergencediagnosis and output analysis for MCMC. R News, 6 (1),
7–11.
Preacher, K. J. & MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Repairing Tom
Swift’s elec-tric factor analysis machine. Understanding
Statistics: Statistical Issues inPsychology, Education, and the
Social Sciences, 2 (1), 13–43.
R Core Team (2014). R: A Language and Environment for
Statistical Com-puting. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for
Statistical Computing.
R Development Core Team (2010). R: A Language and Environment
for Statis-tical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for
Statistical Computing.
Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A., & Pickles, A. (2004).
Generalized multilevelstructural equation modeling. Psychometrika,
69 (2), 167–190.
-
169168
Olsson, U. (1979). Maximum likelihood estimation of the
polychoric correlationcoefficient. Psychometrika, 44 (4),
443–460.
Olsson, U. H., Foss, T., & Breivik, E. (2004). Two
equivalent discrepancyfunctions for maximum likelihood estimation:
Do their test statistics followa non-central chi-square
distribution under model misspecification? Socio-logical Methods
& Research, 32 (4), 453–500.
Olsson, U. H., Troye, S. V., & Howell, R. D. (1999).
Theoretic fit and empiricalfit: The performance of maximum
likelihood versus generalized least squaresestimation in structural
equation models. Multivariate Behavioral Research,34 (1),
31–58.
Oort, F. J. (1991). Theory of violators: Assessing
unidimensionality of psycho-logical measures. In W. K. F. Steyer,
R. & W. K. F. (Eds.), Psychometricmethodology (pp. 377–381).
Stuttgart, Germany: Gustav Fischer.
Oort, F. J. (1992). Using restricted factor analysis to detect
item bias.Methodika, 6, 150–166.
Oort, F. J. (1996). Using Restricted Factor Analysis in Test
Construction.PhD thesis, Docteral dissertation Amsterdam,
University of Amsterdam.
Oort, F. J. (1998). Simulation study of item bias detection with
restrictedfactor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A
Multidisciplinary Journal,5 (2), 107–124.
Oort, F. J. (2011). Likelihood-based confidence intervals in
exploratory factoranalysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A
Multidisciplinary Journal, 18 (3),383–396.
Plummer, M., Best, N., Cowles, K., & Vines, K. (2006). CODA:
Convergencediagnosis and output analysis for MCMC. R News, 6 (1),
7–11.
Preacher, K. J. & MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Repairing Tom
Swift’s elec-tric factor analysis machine. Understanding
Statistics: Statistical Issues inPsychology, Education, and the
Social Sciences, 2 (1), 13–43.
R Core Team (2014). R: A Language and Environment for
Statistical Com-puting. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for
Statistical Computing.
R Development Core Team (2010). R: A Language and Environment
for Statis-tical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for
Statistical Computing.
Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A., & Pickles, A. (2004).
Generalized multilevelstructural equation modeling. Psychometrika,
69 (2), 167–190.
169
Raftery, A. E. & Lewis, S. M. (1992). [practical markov
chain monte carlo]:Comment: One long run with diagnostics:
Implementation strategies formarkov chain monte carlo. Statistical
Science, 7, 493–497.
Raftery, A. E. & Lewis, S. M. (1995). The number of
iterations, convergencediagnostics and generic metropolis
algorithms. In Practical Markov ChainMonte Carlo (W.R. Gilks, D.J.
Spiegelhalter and, (pp. 115–130). London,United Kingkom: Chapman
and Hall.
Reiser, M. & Lin, Y. (1999). A goodness-of-fit test for the
latent class modelwhen expected frequencies are small. Sociological
Methodology, 29 (1), 81–111.
Reiser, M. & VandenBerg, M. (1994). Validity of the
chi-square test in dichoto-mous variable factor analysis when
expected frequencies are small. BritishJournal of Mathematical and
Statistical Psychology, 47 (1), 85–107.
Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. E., & Savalei, V. (2012).
When can categor-ical variables be treated as continuous? a
comparison of robust continuousand categorical sem estimation
methods under suboptimal conditions. Psy-chological Methods, 17
(3), 354–373.
Rigdon, E. E. & Ferguson Jr, C. E. (1991). The performance
of the polychoriccorrelation coefficient and selected fitting
functions in confirmatory factoranalysis with ordinal data. Journal
of Marketing Research, 491–497.
Roberts, G. O. (1996). Markov chain concepts related to sampling
algorithms.In W. R. Gilks, S. Richardson, & D. J. Spiegelhalter
(Eds.), Markov chainMonte Carlo in practice (pp. 45–57). London,
United Kingkom: Springer.
Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation
modeling.Journal of Statistical Software, 48 (2), 1–36.
Ryu, E. & West, S. G. (2009). Level-specific evaluation of
model fit in multi-level structural equation modeling. Structural
Equation Modeling: A Mul-tidisciplinary Journal, 16 (4),
583–601.
Satorra, A. & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test
statistics and standarderrors in covariance structure analysis. In
A. van Eye & C. C. C. (Eds.)(Eds.), Latent Variables Analysis:
Applications to Developmental Research(pp. 399–419). Sage
Publications, Inc; Thousand Oaks, CA.
Satorra, A. & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference
chi-square test statisticfor moment structure analysis.
Psychometrika, 66 (4), 507–514.
Satorra, A. & Bentler, P. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness
of the scaled dif-ference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika,
75 (2), 243–248.
-
170 170
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Werner, C. S., Klein, A. G., &
Moosbrugger, H. (2010).Nonlinear structural equation modeling: is
partial least squares an alterna-tive? Advances in Statistical
Analysis, 94 (2), 167–184.
Schmitt, N. & Kuljanin, G. (2008). Measurement invariance:
Review of prac-tice and implications. Human Resource Management
Review, 18 (4), 210–222.
Sivo, S. A., Fan, X., Witta, E. L., & Willse, J. T. (2006).
The search for” op-timal” cutoff properties: Fit index criteria in
structural equation modeling.The Journal of Experimental Education,
74 (3), 267–288.
Snijders, T. & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel Analysis: An
Introduction to Basicand Advanced Multilevel Modeling. Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., & Van Der
Linde, A. (2002).Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit.
Journal of the Royal Sta-tistical Society: Series B (Statistical
Methodology), 64 (4), 583–639.
Spilt, J. L., Koomen, H. M., & Jak, S. (2012). Are boys
better off with maleand girls with female teachers? a multilevel
investigation of measurementinvariance and gender match in
teacher–student relationship quality. Journalof School Psychology,
50 (3), 363–378.
Steiger, J. H., Shapiro, A., & Browne, M. W. (1985). On the
multivariateasymptotic distribution of sequential chi-square
statistics. Psychometrika,50 (3), 253–263.
Tanner, M. A. & Wong, W. H. (1987). The calculation of
posterior distribu-tions by data augmentation. Journal of the
American Statistical Association,82 (398), 528–540.
Tate, R. (2003). A comparison of selected empirical methods for
assessing thestructure of responses to test items. Applied
Psychological Measurement,27 (3), 159–203.
Ten Holt, J. C., van Duijn, M. A., & Boomsma, A. (2010).
Scale constructionand evaluation in practice: A review of factor
analysis versus item responsetheory applications. Psychological
Test and Assessment Modeling, 52 (3),272–297.
Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and
synthesis of themeasurement invariance literature: Suggestions,
practices, and recommen-dations for organizational research.
Organizational Research Methods, 3 (1),4–70.
-
171170
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Werner, C. S., Klein, A. G., &
Moosbrugger, H. (2010).Nonlinear structural equation modeling: is
partial least squares an alterna-tive? Advances in Statistical
Analysis, 94 (2), 167–184.
Schmitt, N. & Kuljanin, G. (2008). Measurement invariance:
Review of prac-tice and implications. Human Resource Management
Review, 18 (4), 210–222.
Sivo, S. A., Fan, X., Witta, E. L., & Willse, J. T. (2006).
The search for” op-timal” cutoff properties: Fit index criteria in
structural equation modeling.The Journal of Experimental Education,
74 (3), 267–288.
Snijders, T. & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel Analysis: An
Introduction to Basicand Advanced Multilevel Modeling. Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., & Van Der
Linde, A. (2002).Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit.
Journal of the Royal Sta-tistical Society: Series B (Statistical
Methodology), 64 (4), 583–639.
Spilt, J. L., Koomen, H. M., & Jak, S. (2012). Are boys
better off with maleand girls with female teachers? a multilevel
investigation of measurementinvariance and gender match in
teacher–student relationship quality. Journalof School Psychology,
50 (3), 363–378.
Steiger, J. H., Shapiro, A., & Browne, M. W. (1985). On the
multivariateasymptotic distribution of sequential chi-square
statistics. Psychometrika,50 (3), 253–263.
Tanner, M. A. & Wong, W. H. (1987). The calculation of
posterior distribu-tions by data augmentation. Journal of the
American Statistical Association,82 (398), 528–540.
Tate, R. (2003). A comparison of selected empirical methods for
assessing thestructure of responses to test items. Applied
Psychological Measurement,27 (3), 159–203.
Ten Holt, J. C., van Duijn, M. A., & Boomsma, A. (2010).
Scale constructionand evaluation in practice: A review of factor
analysis versus item responsetheory applications. Psychological
Test and Assessment Modeling, 52 (3),272–297.
Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and
synthesis of themeasurement invariance literature: Suggestions,
practices, and recommen-dations for organizational research.
Organizational Research Methods, 3 (1),4–70.
171
Varin, C. (2008). On composite marginal likelihoods. Advances in
StatisticalAnalysis, 92 (1), 1–28.
Varin, C., Reid, N. M., & Firth, D. (2011). An overview of
composite likelihoodmethods. Statistica Sinica, 21 (1), 5–42.
Vasdekis, V. G., Cagnone, S., & Moustaki, I. (2012). A
composite likelihoodinference in latent variable models for ordinal
longitudinal responses. Psy-chometrika, 77 (3), 425–441.
Verhagen, A. J. (2012). Bayesian Item Response Theory Models for
Measur-ment Variance. PhD thesis, Docteral dissertation Twenty,
University ofTwente.
Wirth, R. & Edwards, M. C. (2007). Item factor analysis:
current approachesand future directions. Psychological methods, 12
(1), 58.
Woods, C. M. & Grimm, K. J. (2011). Testing for nonuniform
differentialitem functioning with multiple indicator multiple cause
models. AppliedPsychological Measurement, 35 (5), 339–361.
Xi, N. (2011). A composite likelihood approach for factor
analyzing ordinaldata. PhD thesis, Docteral dissertation Columbus,
OH: Ohio State Univer-sity.
Yang-Wallentin, F., Jöreskog, K. G., & Luo, H. (2010).
Confirmatory factoranalysis of ordinal variables with misspecified
models. Structural EquationModeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,
17 (3), 392–423.
Yu, C.-Y. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit
indices for latentvariable models with binary and continuous
outcomes. PhD thesis, Docteraldissertation Los Angeles, University
of California.
Yuan, K.-H. & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Normal theory based
test statistics instructural equation modelling. British Journal of
Mathematical and Statis-tical Psychology, 51 (2), 289–309.
Yuan, K.-H. & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based
methods for meanand covariance structure analysis with nonnormal
missing data. SociologicalMethodology, 30 (1), 165–200.
Zhang, J. & Stout, W. (1999). Conditional covariance
structure of generalizedcompensatory multidimensional items.
Psychometrika, 64 (2), 129–152.
-
172 172