University of California at Berkeley – Physics Department ch APS Meeting, Portland, OR – March 17, 2010 Thermodynamic measurements of iron-rhodium alloys David W. Cooke, Frances Hellman Physics Department, University of California, Berkeley Stephanie Moyerman, Eric E. Fullerton Physics Department, University of California, San Diego
14
Embed
University of California at Berkeley – Physics Department
Thermodynamic measurements of iron-rhodium alloys. David W. Cooke, Frances Hellman Physics Department, University of California, Berkeley. Stephanie Moyerman , Eric E. Fullerton Physics Department, University of California, San Diego. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
University of California at Berkeley – Physics Department
March APS Meeting, Portland, OR – March 17, 2010
Thermodynamic measurements of iron-rhodium alloys
David W. Cooke, Frances HellmanPhysics Department, University of California, Berkeley
Stephanie Moyerman, Eric E. FullertonPhysics Department, University of California, San Diego
Why Fe-Rh?
Superparamagnetic limit – KUV ~ kBT
Large K?
Alternative: FePt / FeRh bi-layerThiele, J.-U., Maat, S., and Fullerton, E.E. APL 82, 2859 (2003)
FeRh undergoes an AFM>FM transition at Tcrit ~ 50ºC
RT < T < Tcrit: AFM FeRh; large K fixes FePt momentTcrit < T < TC: FM FeRh reduces HC to flip FePt via coupling
→ Large H or T ~ TC
University of California at Berkeley – Physics Department
March APS Meeting, Portland, OR – March 17, 2010
MgO (100)
FePt (111)
FeRh (100)
m
m
FeRh Magnetic Phases
AFM IIT < Tcrit
FMTcrit < T
Tcrit
University of California at Berkeley – Physics Department
March APS Meeting, Portland, OR – March 17, 2010
Electrons in AF/FM States
Tu, P. et al. J. Appl. Phys. 40, 1368 (1969)
University of California at Berkeley – Physics Department
March APS Meeting, Portland, OR – March 17, 2010
AFM
FM
222
3
1BF kDT
T
C Koenig, C. J. Phys. F 12, 1123 (1982)
εF
εF
Electrons in AF/FM States
%6
'
,0,0
'
0
FMAFM
critAFF
T
F
UU
TS
TDdTT
CS
Tu, P. et al. J. Appl. Phys. 40, 1368 (1969)
University of California at Berkeley – Physics Department
March APS Meeting, Portland, OR – March 17, 2010
AFM
FM
222
3
1BF kDT
T
C
Alloys allow for tuning of Tcrit , eventually pushing Tcrit = 0 yielding a FM ground state
Electron-driven modelPros of electron-driven model:• Difference in N(EF) seen in DFT for AF/FM states because of
splitting of d-bands leaving gap at EF
• Assuming fixed N(EF) of T, matches experimental ΔS at Tcrit for a number of alloys
Cons of electron-driven model:• Fe49.5Rh45.5Ir5 has higher Tcrit but γAFM ~2γFM!
Outstanding questions:• No model of field/alloy dependence of Tcrit
• No DFT work explaining lack of Tcrit in certain alloys
University of California at Berkeley – Physics Department
March APS Meeting, Portland, OR – March 17, 2010
Thermal Fluctuation Model
nnn
iknnnnn
iknni nnnnn
kiikikii rVrVSSrJSDU,
2
• Note the shoulder at ~200K• Two-state system (Schottky)
• FM – competition between non/magnetization of Rh• AFM – no such competition because Fe AFM cancels
Gruner, M.E., et al. Phys. Rev. B 67, 064415 (2003)
University of California at Berkeley – Physics Department
March APS Meeting, Portland, OR – March 17, 2010
Tcrit Tcurie
“Calorimeter on a Chip”
• Specific heat of thin films– 30nm-200nm– 2K - 500K– 0T - 8T
2006 APS KeithleyInstrumentation Award
t
e
C
T
P
University of California at Berkeley – Physics Department
March APS Meeting, Portland, OR – March 17, 2010
IBAD MgO Calorimeter
45º
MgO Target
Substrate
TargetIon Source
SubstrateIon Source
Figure adapted from L.S. Yu, et. Al., J. Vac. Sci. A 4, 443 (1986)
IBAD MgO(100) On Devices
• Current calorimeters limited to amorphous/polycrystalline films
• Use IBAD MgO on SiNX as template to grow biaxially-oriented films!
• MgO grows (100) out of plane
• 45º to substrate yields (110) in-plane due to channeling
• Provides biaxially oriented substrate
• Well-studied for high-Tc materials
• Can use as template for STO, etc.
University of California at Berkeley – Physics Department
March APS Meeting, Portland, OR – March 17, 2010
FeRh Magnetization Data
University of California at Berkeley – Physics Department
March APS Meeting, Portland, OR – March 17, 2010
FeRh XRD on IBAD MgO
• Similarly high crystal quality with some relaxation on IBAD
• Slightly more mosaicity than MgO sample
• Maintains four-fold symmetry
University of California at Berkeley – Physics Department
March APS Meeting, Portland, OR – March 17, 2010
(100) out-of-plane Azimuthal scan
Specific Heat of Fe.49Rh.51
University of California at Berkeley – Physics Department
March APS Meeting, Portland, OR – March 17, 2010
Specific Heat of Fe.49Rh.51
University of California at Berkeley – Physics Department
March APS Meeting, Portland, OR – March 17, 2010
Future Work
University of California at Berkeley – Physics Department
March APS Meeting, Portland, OR – March 17, 2010
Conclusions:
• We have grown IBAD MgO on our unique a-SiNx-based microcalorimeters
• We have confirmed growth of high quality Fe.49Rh.51 films on IBAD MgO
• Specific heat data obtained on Fe.49Rh.51 matches that in the literature
• Growth of an Fe-rich alloy on IBAD MgO was confirmed to be FM down to 2K
Future work:
• Measure CP of this FM FeRh as a function of H, T to examine two-state Rh theory
• Ongoing collaboration to examine domain formation during AF>FM transition in using our devices as an in-situ heater stage in magnetic soft x-ray transmission microscope at the Advanced Light Source (LBNL)
• DFT calculations of non-stoichiometric FeRh alloys