University autonomy and governance Baku Bologna Seminar - Current issues in the Bologna process Bastian Baumann, Baku, 26 May 2008
University autonomy and governance
Baku Bologna Seminar
-
Current issues in the Bologna process
Bastian Baumann, Baku, 26 May 2008
Magna Charta Universitatum
• Signed by 388 rectors in Bologna on 18 September 1988
• Now 600 signatories
• Worldwide geographical coverage– Currently 77 countries
Content
• Fundamental values and principles of the university– Institutional autonomy– Academic freedom
• Based on common heritage of the university
Magna Charta Observatory
• Founded in 2001 by University of Bologna and European Rectors Conference (now EUA)
• Based at the University of Bologna
• No membership
Mission
• Gather information, express opinions and prepare documents relating to the respect for, protection and promotion of, the fundamental university values and rights laid out in the Magna Charta Universitatum
Activities
• Monitoring function
• Convenor
• Advisor
• Think tank
• Worldwide scope of activities
The Context
• Bologna Declaration reference to Magna Charta Universitatum in the preamble
• Subsequent communiqués
Why autonomy?
• HE as a service for the state? Not only!
• Cradle of knowledge and knowledge production
• Societal development
• Critical thinking
• Mid-term perspective rather than short-term
Bologna Declaration
„Universities' independence and autonomy ensure that higher education and research systems continuously adapt to changing needs, society's demands and advances in scientific knowledge“
General issues of autonomy
• Operational autonomy • Financial management• Governance• Study programmes• Areas of specialisation (Teaching and research)• Staff development• Etc.
What is autonomy not?
• Budget cuts
• Less inclusive / democratic models of governance
Requirements
• Operation free from political and economic interests
• Responsibility
• Accountability
• Academic freedom
Public Responsibility
• Directed at the state• But also university responsibility
– Serve to and advance society
• Only truly autonomous institutions can fulfil their public responsibility to the largest extend possible
• Also social responsibility
Autonomy and the Bologna Action Lines I
• System of 2/3 cycles– 3+2 / 4+1 / 3.5+1.5 = 300 ECTS– Which programmes
• Easily readable, comparable and compatible degrees– Learning Outcomes (Qualifications
Frameworks)– Diploma Supplement
Autonomy and the Bologna Action Lines II
• Quality Assurance– Internal QA
• European Standards and Guidelines
– External QA• (Additional) accreditations and evaluations
– How to use outcomes of quality assurance activities
– Berlin Communiqué
Autonomy and the Bologna Action Lines III
• Mobility– Strategy– Partner institutions– Staff and student mobility– Recognition procedures
• European Dimension– Learning Outcomes– Joint Degrees / Double Degrees– Study programmes
Autonomy and the Bologna Action Lines IV
• ECTS– Curricula structure / emphasis– Credit allocation– Workload measuring– Learning Outcomes
• Lifelong Learning– How– What– Recognition of prior learning
Autonomy and the Bologna Action Lines V
• Promoting attractiveness– As far as applicable – Erasmus Mundus– How to promote / undertake PR – Brand Bologna?
• Student Participation– Ensure at all levels / in all activities– How is up to the institution if not enshrined in law– Informal mechanisms– Use autonomy in such a way that students support it
Autonomy and the Bologna Action Lines VI
• Research– Which areas– Which type– How to link with teaching– How to involve students
Governance
• Diverse structures– Best model to accomplish mission
• Involvement– Academic staff– Non-academic staff– Students– Other stakeholders
• Accountability vs. state influence
Main Principles
• Efficient• Effective• Democratic / Inclusive
– Good balance between top-down and bottom-up• Dialogue
• Leadership responsibility– Interaction with faculties– Interaction with different groups– Delegation of power
Conclusions I
• Bologna: – Flexibility and tailor-made solutions– Not complete harmonisation
• Universities require autonomy also for implementation (Bergen Communiqué)
Conclusions II
• Implementation within the framework, but according to own mission and strategy
• Culture of autonomy and inclusive governance
• Autonomy basis for European Higher Education Area and fulfilment of the purposes of education (London Communiqué)
Contact
www.magna-charta.org
Via Zamboni 25
40126 Bologna
Italy