1 United States Fleet Forces United States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy United States Fleet Forces United States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy Ship Maintenance Ship Maintenance RADM Jeff Brooks RADM Jeff Brooks FFC N43 FFC N43 Ver: VSRA Final 15 Feb 07
29
Embed
United States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy United States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy 1 Ship.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
Ship MaintenanceShip Maintenance
RADM Jeff BrooksRADM Jeff BrooksFFC N43FFC N43
Ver: VSRA Final 15 Feb 07
2United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
Required Focus Required Focus
A + A oFRP oLife Cycle A = Fleeto
3United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
Desired OutcomesDesired Outcomes
• CNO understanding of:– Maintenance governance
– Maintenance requirements process approach validity
– Maintenance communication thresholds
– FY07 execution plan
• Supporting Information:– Maintenance process changes underway across Fleet
Readiness Enterprise (FRE)
– Maintenance process/performance metrics in use/development to identify and drive change
– Future maintenance risk items with threshold potential
4United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
AgendaAgenda
• Where we are today
• Discussion of Alignment, Governance and Thresholds
• Vision of where we are heading:– Maintenance process improvements– Aligning warfare enterprises around
common processes – Potential out-year domain challenges
Deliver efficiency & effectiveness aligned with FRP
5United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
Navy Ship Maintenance ActivitiesNavy Ship Maintenance Activities
AS-39 USS EMORY S LAND @ La Maddalena
AS-40 USS FRANK CABLE @ Guam
MARMC Det. Naples
MARMC Det. Bahrain
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard & Intermediate
Maintenance Facility(PSNS & IMF)
(RMC)
Norfolk Naval Shipyard
SouthwestRegional
MaintenanceCenter (RMC)
San DiegoSouth CentralRMC Ingleside
Mid-Atlantic RMC Norfolk
Trident Refit Facility Kings Bay Southeast RMC Mayport
Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard & IMF
(RMC)
Ship RepairFacility
Yokosuka(RMC)
Nuclear Submarine Support Facility New London
SUPSHIP Groton
SUPSHIP Newport News
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard
Mission funded & aligned through “One Shipyard” construct.
6United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
POM/BudgetProcess
Today’s StrategyToday’s Strategy
Ship Maintenance & Modernization Domain
(SYSCOMs)
ENGINEEREDMAINT. PLANS (Platform Sponsors/PEOs)
MODERNIZATION
Requirements Generation
Fleet Readiness Enterprise$
CONDITIONBASED MAINT.
(Fleets) InputsM
aterialR
eadiness
Units Ready
For Tasking
Dem
and
Sig
nal
COCOMs
NCCsFRP Readiness + Life Cycle Readiness
Cost
7United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
Maintenance Supports OpsMaintenance Supports Ops
Notional CVN FRTP:
Continuous Maint. (CM) Periods
• PIAs & DPIAs are “Hard” Scheduling Targets• Dry-dock Constraints• FY $$’s• Industrial Base Loading
• CM Schedules More Flexible• Max Interface w/ TYCOM and Fleet N3’s
INTEGRATEDTRAINING
BASICTRAINING
6 Mo Planned Incremental
Availability (PIA) or 10 ½ Mo
Docking PIA
DEPLOYMENTREDEPLOYMENT(SUSTAINMENT)
MAINTENANCEPHASE
Ao FRTP + Ao Life Cycle = Ao Total
8United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
Maintenance Program ContentMaintenance Program Content
Modernization
Corrective Maintenance (CSMP)
Class Maint Plan (CMP)
Engineered Requirements
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
FY05FY98 FY05FY98 FY98 FY05
Exe
cute
d M
aint
enan
ce M
an-
days
41
43
16
70
20
10
82
8
1021
64
23
13
21
58
21
21
21
21
43
36
SurfaceCarrierSubmarine
9United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
Should Maintenance Content be the Same?Should Maintenance Content be the Same?
• Class Maintenance Plan content differs because of:
– System certifications (nuclear, subsafe, flight deck)
– Aging Effects
– Hull life expectancy
– Maintenance scheduling intervals
10United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
How Do We Determine the Right CMP Content?How Do We Determine the Right CMP Content?
MaintenanceExecution
Ship Configuration
Integration
Maint History& Feedback
Continuous Improvement
Class Maint Plans•Maintenance Requirements
•Assessment Procedures•Maintenance Strategies
Work Package Development
Requirements Deferral Review
ModernizationCSMP
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
CarrierSubmarine Surface
Modernization
Corrective Maintenance (CSMP)
Class Maint Plan (CMP)
Engineered Requirements
Exe
cute
d M
aint
enan
ce M
an-
days
Cycles of Learning Drive CMP improvements.
41
43
16
70
10
82
8
10
21
64
23
13
21
58
21
21
21
21
43
36
20
11United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
• Corrosion control
• Planning/Support services
• Maintenance intensive components/systems
• Modernization
What are the Big Cost Drivers?What are the Big Cost Drivers?
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Surface
Habitability/Upgrades
Program Alterations
Fleet Alterations
Corrective Maintenance
Class Maint Plan (CMP)
Corrective, contingency
CMP Scheduled Rqmts
CMP Corrosion, contingency
Corrosion Control
CarrierSubmarine
Exe
cute
d M
ain
tena
nce
Man
-day
s
Targets for Maintenance Improvement
1
27
30
7
16
7
5
7
1
42
16
18
1
12
82
1
58
11
7
13
8
1
1
1
29
24
13
13
6
6
6
3
41
24
9
18
7
21
21
26
15
16
1
12United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
• The CNO brief contained a workload forecast graph that was classified “For Official Use Only-Business Sensitive”. To avoid classifying this version of the brief in that manner, the graph was removed for purposes of general distribution and key points noted below.
• Graph key points:• Submarine workload begins significant decline in
FY09• BRAC retention of all four SYs exacerbated capacity
overload• High overtime the norm thru FY08 due to projected
requirement reduction starting in FY09• Manning reduction glide slope feasible without
adverse personnel actions
26United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
FY 07 Execution PlanFY 07 Execution Plan
5% Challenge is in Addition to Previous Marks and Mitigations
CNO was provided a synopsis of the FY07 ship maintenance execution plan that
included the challenge noted in the banner below for all ship maintenance domain
members to execute all requirements using only 95% of projected funding. Specific
briefing numbers included in the version of this brief presented to the CNO have been
removed as they are no longer current.
27United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
–Maintenance governance is correctly aligned
–Maintenance requirements process approach is valid
Take-AwaysTake-Aways
–FY07 execution strategy
–Maintenance communication thresholds
28United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
A + A oFRP oLife Cycle A = Fleeto
29United States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyUnited States Fleet ForcesUnited States Fleet Forces Operational Readiness, Effectiveness, PrimacyOperational Readiness, Effectiveness, Primacy
Top 5 Cost Drivers by Ship ClassTop 5 Cost Drivers by Ship Class
Slide 10 backup.
Class System System System System System
CVN 68Aircraft Launching Systems
Steam Heating Systems
Discharge Storage Systems Aircraft Elevators
Firemain and Flushing Piping
CG 47Waste Heat Systems
Propulsion Shafting Fuel Oil Tanks
Helo Handl/Spt Facilities
Propellers/ Propulsors
DDG 51Prop. Reduction Gear
Propulsion Shafting
Comb Msl/Rkt Lnch/Stow/Handl
Propellers/ Propulsors
SS Gas Turb Gen Spt Systems
FFG 7SS Diesel Generator Sewage System
Helo Handl/Spt Facilities HP Air System Steering System
LHA 1 Propulsion Boiler Ballast TanksData Display Group Main Feed Pumps Aircraft Elevators