Top Banner
Unit 7 Objective: We will discuss the concerns and interactions between the USA and American Indians from the 1930’s to present time.
60

Unit 7

Feb 23, 2016

Download

Documents

Dori

Unit 7 . Objective: We will discuss the concerns and interactions between the USA and American Indians from the 1930’s to present time. . Moving Forward. Reform of 1910’s (page 411) and prosperity of 20’s led to investigations of Indian affairs  Merriam Report 1928 . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Unit 7

Unit 7

Objective: We will discuss the concerns and interactions between the USA and American Indians from

the 1930’s to present time.

Page 2: Unit 7

Moving Forward

• Reform of 1910’s (page 411) and prosperity of 20’s led to investigations of Indian affairs Merriam Report 1928.– Move forward, not back and

attempt to reform. • Great Depression will

further set back the cause of the American Indian.

• Coolidge and Osage

Page 3: Unit 7

John Collier• “Indian New Deal”– Looked to promote

Indian society and culture

– Day schools on reservations instead of boarding schools

– More state involvement in Indian issues

– (IRA 1934) Dawes Act repealed, allotments ended, tribal community land restored.

Page 4: Unit 7

“Indian New Deal” Speech

Page 5: Unit 7
Page 6: Unit 7

Movement and Termination

• 1940’s and 1950’s called for 3 pronged program:– Compensation, termination, relocation– End all land disputes, turn Indian affairs to state and

tribes, and relocate Indians to cities. • Finally totally weave Indians into mainstream

America• “Wipe the slate clean”

Page 7: Unit 7

Indian Claims Commission

• Looked to pay for any ignored treaties from 1778 to 1871.

• Tribes had to prove previous ownership, and where $ would go.

• Led to tribal “membership” and “benefits” disputes, arguments over value of land, and bureaucratic red tape.

• Took until 1978 to conclude, paid over 800$ million to tribes, some still dispute these decisions.

Page 8: Unit 7

Termination (1950’s)

• Movement to end federal gov’t involvement in Indian affairs for tribes who had made “progress”.

• Passed off tribal obligations like health care and education to many states and tribes to save $, but most tribes crashed economically , lost huge chunks of land, and became dependant upon government welfare programs.

Page 9: Unit 7

Termination Policy• The government believed that there were tribes that were ready to

be part of main stream American society and no longer needed the protection of the federal government. Two tribes, the Klamaths who owned valuable timber property in Oregon and the Agua Caliente, who owned the land around Palm Springs were some of the first tribes to be affected by the policy. These lands, rich in resources, were taken over by the Federal Government.

In 1953 Congress adopted an official policy of "termination" declaring that the goal was "as rapidly as possible to make Indians within the territorial limits of the United States subject to the same laws and entitled to the same privileges and responsibilities as are applicable to other citizens of the United States." (House Concurrent Resolution 108)

• http://www.nrcprograms.org/site/PageServer?pagename=cin_hist_terminationpolicy

Page 10: Unit 7

Relocation

• WWII industry led many to leave rez, 1956 Relocation Act looked to capitalize on this.

• By 1970 44% lived in cities, by 1980 over half did.

• Became involved in 60’s culture and activism.

• Problems? Benefits?

Page 11: Unit 7
Page 12: Unit 7
Page 13: Unit 7
Page 14: Unit 7
Page 15: Unit 7

Political and Social Action/Change

• Throughout 40’s, 50’s, 60’s lands were continually diminished by dams, strong arm tactics, political control of BIA, etc. new types of activism modeled after?– Wallace Mad Bear and nonviolent movement vs. NY

• Movements brought together tribal members, increased pride, relocation programs led to urban populations growing more militant due to conditions/time.

Page 16: Unit 7

Dams and Reservoirs in USA

Page 17: Unit 7

Indian Militancy

• 1961 Am. Indian Chicago Conf. led to Declaration of Indian Purpose.

• NIYC exemplified youth movement, anger. – “We are not free” -Clyde Warrior– Pacific coast “fish-ins” indicative

of civil disobedience– Formation of AIM and

“Indian Patrols” in Minneapolis show the mobilization/radicalized new population.

• Actor Marlon Brando and Puyallup tribal leader Bob Satiacum just before Brando's arrest during a fish-in, March 2, 1964Courtesy Seattle Post-Intelligencer

Page 18: Unit 7
Page 19: Unit 7

Activism Militancy

• AIM / other movements used protest to further causes. Led to eventual violence. – ‘68 Inter. Bridge Blockade– ’69 Seizure of Alcatraz– 70 Thanksgiving “Mourning”– 71 Mt. Rushmore– 72 Trail of Broken Treaties an

d occupation of BIA building. Outcome of 20 points?

Page 20: Unit 7
Page 21: Unit 7
Page 22: Unit 7

• "High on a hill, overlooking the famed Plymouth Rock, stands the statue of our great Sachem, Massasoit. Massasoit has stood there many years in silence. We the descendants of this great Sachem have been a silent people. The necessity of making a living in this materialistic society of the white man caused us to be silent. Today, I and many of my people are choosing to face the truth. We ARE Indians!

"Although time has drained our culture, and our language is almost extinct, we the Wampanoags still walk the lands of Massachusetts. We may be fragmented, we may be confused. Many years have passed since we have been a people together. Our lands were invaded. We fought as hard to keep our land as you the whites did to take our land away from us. We were conquered, we became the American prisoners of war in many cases, and wards of the United States Government, until only recently.

Page 23: Unit 7
Page 24: Unit 7
Page 25: Unit 7

Siege at Wounded Knee• Policy failures led to increased

radicalism / tension• Tension led to increased

federal presence --> AIM and Means, Banks overtook Wounded Knee, est. own “nation”

• Lasted 71 days until treaty was signed, not recognized. Peltier legacy.

• Violence continued between Dick Wilson’s “goons” and activists until 1976.

Page 26: Unit 7

Dick Wilson and BIA’s Power• Within three years of the Wounded Knee II

siege, 69 members and supporters of AIM died violently on the reservation. Nearly 350 others were physically assaulted. None of their killers were convicted, and many of the cases were never investigated. Many AIM leaders were imprisoned.

• http://www.pbs.org/itvs/alcatrazisnotanisland/activism.html

Page 27: Unit 7

Legacy of AIM / Militantism

• Two sides– Temporary coverage/

impact for cause. Violence wrong way, unproductive. No substance.

– Renewed interest, pride in cultural heritage. Spawned new groups, many to reconnect to Indian heritage, etc.

Page 28: Unit 7

• Before AIM [American Indian Movement], Indians were dispirited, defeated and culturally dissolving. People were ashamed to be Indian. You didn't see the young people wearing braids or chokers or ribbon shirts in those days. Hell, I didn't wear 'em. People didn't Sun Dance, they didn't Sweat, they were losing their languages. Then there was that spark at Alcatraz, and we took off. Man, we took a ride across this country. We put Indians and Indian rights smack dab in the middle of the public consciousness for the first time since the so-called Indian Wars.... [AIM] laid the groundwork for the next stage in regaining our sovereignty and self-determination as nation, and I'm proud to have been a part of that.- Russell Means (Oglala Lakota)

Page 29: Unit 7

Current Reservation Lands

Page 30: Unit 7
Page 31: Unit 7

Chapter 8

Nations within a Nation: Indian

Country since 1980

Page 33: Unit 7
Page 34: Unit 7

Gaming

Page 35: Unit 7
Page 36: Unit 7

Gaming on Indian Lands

• Why?– Sovereignty and economic self-reliance is seen as only

way to break poverty cycle. (60’s/70’s)– Economic opportunities limited in so many ways they

turned to gaming (took page out of U.S. book)• How?– Seminoles in ‘79 w/ bingo led to Supreme Court ruling

which led to California v. Cabazon– IGRA ‘88 allowed states/tribes to run casinos on lands

• Federal v. State v. Tribal Sovereignty argument

Page 37: Unit 7

Positives

• Mississippi Choctaws one of 10 largest employers in Mississippi.

• Seminole tribe purchased Hard Rock for 965 million in 2006.

• California Tribes: 18 tribes own many casinos

• Pequot's in Connecticut own Foxwoods/Mohegan Sun

Page 38: Unit 7

Overall Benefits• Tribes receive $4 of every $10 that Americans wager at casinos. • Indian casinos earn $26.7 billion in 2008 revenues. • There are 425 Indian gaming facilities. • 240 tribes operate casinos. • Indian gaming operates in 28 states • 24 states allow full-scale Indian casinos, 4 allow only Class II

casinos (bingo slots) • Indian casinos provide 712,000 jobs with $27 billion in wages • Indian gaming paid $10.8 billion in local, state and federal taxes in

2008. • Indian gaming pays $1.3 billion in taxes to federal, state, local

governments. • Source: National Indian Gaming Commission www.nigc.gov

Page 39: Unit 7
Page 40: Unit 7

Connecticut Casinos

Page 41: Unit 7

Connecticut Casinos

Foxwoods (Pequot) Mohegan Sun (Mohegans)

Page 42: Unit 7

Mashantucket Pequot museum

Page 43: Unit 7
Page 44: Unit 7

Tribal Benefits• Economic freedoms lead to

cultural awareness, programs, buildings, legal monies, etc.

• State revenues in billions – Political power restored in

states (p. 545 quote)• Guaranteed employment,

health care, housing, government programs, education, etc for some of the tribes

• 2007 took in more revenue than Vegas (26.7 Billion)

• http://500nations.com/news/Indian_Casinos/20090603.asp

Page 45: Unit 7

Mt. Pleasant MI, Ojibwa NationCultural Center Casino

Page 46: Unit 7

Arguments Against• Who would argue against Indian gaming rights?– Local communities against traffic, influence, etc. – Other gaming entities (AC and Vegas)– Resentment and stereotypes – Indian Arguments Against?• Weariness of relationships with states/compromise of

sovereignty • Vices and impact upon culture/tribe/reservations• Non-Indian involvement • Divisions within tribes and with other tribes

Page 47: Unit 7

Green Bay, WI. Oneida Nation

Gas station gamblingAnother gas station (7 casinos within reservation)

Page 48: Unit 7

Confronting Modern Issues

• Alcohol/Drugs– HIGH alcoholism rates health issues, depression. Meth

use rising/effects– Combating addiction– Violence/Rape (start at 18:00)– Gangs

• Repatriation: Returning bones/artifacts– Showed lack of humanity to Indians vs. Science/Research– 80’s began period of returning items, 1990 Native

American Grave Protection and Repatriation Act.

Page 49: Unit 7
Page 50: Unit 7
Page 51: Unit 7

• North Dakota alcohol impact upon the reservations.

Page 52: Unit 7

21st Century Indians

• Changes over last 500+ years indicative of many problems, but also the resilience of the Indian. Poverty, government actions, genocide, etc. have not killed the Indian, nor their spirit/ideas. Adaption has been constant and will continue on into the 21st century. What roles they serve will be interesting and progress will hopefully ensue.

Page 53: Unit 7
Page 54: Unit 7
Page 55: Unit 7

Reflection

• Has your opinion changed about this/any topic regarding NA history?

• What was the most interesting part/unit of this course?

• What do you take from this class overall?• Would you recommend this class to a friend?

Why or why not?• Thoughts for improvement?

Page 56: Unit 7

Quiz (457-463)• 1. Post WWII saw a population shift from reservations to

_________? Fill in the blank• 2. This group was responsible for many social reforms in Indian

communities in 1960’s. • 3. List one specific protest/action taken by Indians in 60’s and

70’s to realize treaty rights, freedoms. • 4. Who led the siege at Wounded Knee on the Indian side?• 5. Which of the following was the radical Indian group whose

impact has been debated since the 1970’s. • A. Means D. NYIC• B. Wilson E. BIA• C. AIM

Page 57: Unit 7

Wounded Knee Episodes 1&2 Video Quiz

• 1). Which Indian activist organization led the takeover of Wounded Knee?

• 2). What were problems that Lakota had with Dick Wilson’s (tribal chairman) role on the Lakota Pine Ridge reservation?

• 3). How was the U.S. military used in response to the takeover?

• 4). Why did Indians claim they needed to use violence? • 5). What incident in Custer, SD exemplified racist

attitudes towards Indians?

Page 58: Unit 7

Quiz• 1). LIST one stereotype modern Indians are

supposed to perpetuate?• 2). Which has been most critical for tribal economic

success?• 3). Which tribe owns Hard Rock International?• 4). List one negative of gaming for Indian

populations• 5). List one benefit of gaming for individual Indians.• A. Sovereignty • B. Seminole• C. Choctaw

Page 59: Unit 7

523-530 Quiz

• 1. List one problem for Indian tribes to maintain their sovereignty.

• 2. Why are Indians considered “triple citizens?”• 3. Overall, how has the Supreme Court ruled in

sovereignty cases? • 4. How has the population information on

Indians changed according to the census?

Page 60: Unit 7

544-550 Quiz• 1. Which tribe is one of the 10 largest employers in

Mississippi due to gaming funds? • 2. Which tribe eventually turned a bingo parlor into

owning Hard Rock International?• 3. List one specific benefit gaming money brings to

some tribes?• 4. What role do state governments have in Indian

gaming?• 5. List one specific problem Indian peoples have

with gaming on their reservations.