Unit 2 Tort Law. 2 Negligence l Conduct lacking in due care l Carelessness l Deviation from standard of care that a reasonable person would use in a particular.

Unit 2

Tort Law

2

Negligence Conduct lacking in due care Carelessness Deviation from standard of care that a reasonable person

would use in a particular set of circumstances Doing something that the reasonable and prudent person

would not do Applies to professionals as well as other non professionals

3

Malpractice Tortfeasor (person committing civil wrong) must be a

professional Professional misconduct Unreasonable lack of skill or fidelity in professional or

judiciary duties Evil practice Illegal or immoral conduct

4

Malpractice Continued Results in injury or unnecessary suffering or death of

patient Proceeds from ignorance, carelessness, want of

professional skill, disregard of established rules and principles, neglect, or a malicious or criminal intent

5

Establishment of Liability Duty owed the patient: reliance relationship, care owed of

reasonably prudent nurse judged by expert testimony, published standards, and common sense

Breach of the duty owed the patient - deviation from standard care

Foreseeability: what reasonably could be expected

6

Establishment of Liability Continued Causation: Cause in fact - breach of duty owed caused

injury; proximate cause - how far liability extends for consequences of action

Injury - physical, emotional, financial Damages: General damages inherent in case; special

damages such as losses, expenses; emotional damage; punitive damage

7

Doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitor - Let the thing speak for itself Doctrine allows a negligence cause of action without all

six elements Must prove causation, injury, damages Used in cases where for example patient was

unconscious in surgery

8

Locality Rule Professional viewed by a prevailing community standard Has been abolished in most cases Judicial Law: Idaho Supreme Court -

Buck v. St. Clair (1981)

9

Locality Rule Abolished Availability of mass media Professional organizations and standards Standards for accreditation of hospitals

10

Intentional Torts Tort: civil wrong committed against a person or person’s

property Not based on contracts Three elements: Volitional act by the defendant (not omission) Intent to bring about consequences or appear to have

intended to bring about consequences

11

Intentional Torts Continued Causation - act must be substantial factor in bringing

about injury or consequences (damages need not be incurred)

12

Examples of Torts Intentional torts: assault, battery, false imprisonment,

conversion of property Quasi-intentional torts: defamation of character, invasion

of privacy

13

Assault Apprehension of unwarranted touching

14

Battery Harmful or unwarranted contact with the plaintiff-patient Single touch sufficient for tort No harm or injury need occur to the patient Patient need not be aware Causation through direct or indirect contact-

example: nurse dropping a tray

15

Battery Continued Unwarranted touching of patient belongings Lack of consent most common cause

16

False Imprisonment Unjustifiable detention of person without legal warrant to

confine person Must be knowledge of imprisonment by patient for it to

occur Incompetent, mentally ill, or persons posing a threat to

society may be detained against will

17

Conversion of Property Interference with right to possession of patient’s property Need to have adequate justification of action

18

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Professional conduct goes beyond that tolerated by

society Conduct calculated to cause mental distress Conduct causes mental distress

19

Invasion of Privacy Unreasonable unwarranted interference with individual's

solitude Patient has right against 1) Appropriation of plaintiff’s

name or picture for defendant’s sole advantage; 2) Intrusion by defendant upon patient’s seclusion or affairs; 3) Publication by the defendant of facts that place the patient in a false light; 4) Public disclosure of private facts about the patient by hospital staff or medical personnel

20

Defamation Comprised of slander (oral) and libel (written) Wrongful injury to another’s reputation Five elements Defamatory language that adversely affects reputation Defamatory language concerning living person

21

Defamation Continued Publication to a third party or several persons Damage to person’s reputation Fault on part of defendant in writing or telling another the

defamatory language

22

Defenses against intentional torts Consent or implied by law through:

prevention of loss of life or limb; person incapable; no reasonable reason to believe consent would not be given; reasonable person in similar circumstances would give consent

Truth in defamation cases

23

Defenses Against Torts Continued Privilege - to protect public and private interests.

Example - recommendation from former to prospective employer; appropriate channels used; truthful; objective terms

Disclosure Statutes: reporting of information for health reasons

Intentional torts mitigated by retraction, if provoked

24

Defenses to Nonintentional Torts Release: only compensated for negative action Contributory negligence: patient contributes to negative

action Assumption of risk: Plaintiff understood and is partially

responsible Immunity Statutes: Example - Good Samaritan Law

25

Statute of Limitation In most states, 2 to 4 years, or with a child, until age of

maturity In North Carolina, 3 years for most cases

26

Informed Consent Expressed or implied; written or oral, complete or partial Major exceptions: Emergency , therapeutic privilege,

patient waiver, prior patient knowledge or common knowledge

Other exceptions: preservation of life, protection of minors, prevention of self destruction, maintenance of ethical integrity, protection of public’s health