Performance Appraisal of Union Bank CHAPTER I Introduction to Banking Sector Banking can be defined in various ways as the definition of the bank varies from country to country and keeps on changing on the basis of the activities carried out by the banks. In present dynamic business scenario, banking can be defined as the activities carried out with the bank on individual or corporate level. We can understand the concept of the banking by looking into the activities of the bank. A bank is a well regularized and licensed financial institute to assist the individual and corporate customer in their financial needs. Normally banks provide the following services to its retail (individual) and corporate clients: Transactional services, Services related to monetary transaction through current and saving account, Investment services, Fixed deposit , Letter of credit , Treasury services , Bill of exchange , Foreign exchange , Assisting in trade through Letter of credit, Letter of guarantee, Performance bond , Project financing , Page 1
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Performance Appraisal of Union Bank
CHAPTER I
Introduction to Banking Sector
Banking can be defined in various ways as the definition of the bank varies from country to
country and keeps on changing on the basis of the activities carried out by the banks. In
present dynamic business scenario, banking can be defined as the activities carried out with
the bank on individual or corporate level. We can understand the concept of the banking by
looking into the activities of the bank.
A bank is a well regularized and licensed financial institute to assist the individual and
corporate customer in their financial needs. Normally banks provide the following services to
its retail (individual) and corporate clients:
Transactional services,
Services related to monetary transaction through current and saving account,
Investment services,
Fixed deposit ,
Letter of credit ,
Treasury services ,
Bill of exchange ,
Foreign exchange ,
Assisting in trade through Letter of credit,
Letter of guarantee,
Performance bond ,
Project financing ,
Personal loan ,
Credit card ,
Home loan etc.
Banking sector In India
Banking in India originated in the last decades of the 18th century. The oldest bank in
existence in India is the ‘State Bank of India’, a government-owned bank that traces its
origins back to June 1806 and that is the largest commercial bank in the country. Central
banking is the responsibility of the Reserve Bank of India, which in 1935 formally took over
take care of organizational as well as individual needs; and
help in creating a clean environment by
- Linking rewards with achievements,
- generating information for the growth of the employee as well as of the organization,
- suggesting appropriate person-task matching and career plans.
Feedback is an important component of “Performance Appraisal”. While positive feedback is
easily accepted, negative feedback often meets with resistance unless it is objective, based on
a credible source and given in a skilful manner.
Page 9
Performance Appraisal of Union Bank
THE PROCESS OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
(a) “Performance Appraisal” System: The Process
“Performance Appraisal” involves an evaluation of actual against desired performance. It also
helps in reviewing various factors which influence performance. Managers should plan
performance development strategies in a structured manner for each employee. In doing so,
they should keep the goals of the organization in mind and aim at optimal utilization of all
available resources, including financial. “Performance Appraisal” is a multistage process in
which communication plays an important role.
Craig, Beatty and Baird (1986) suggested an eight-stage “Performance Appraisal” process:
(i) Establishing Standards and Measures
The first step is to identify and establish measures which would differentiate between
successful and unsuccessful performances. These measures should be under the control of the
employees being appraised. The methods for assessing performance should be decided next.
Basically, management wants to:
Page 10
Performance Appraisal of Union Bank
know the behavior and personal characteristics of each employee; and
assess their performance and achievement in the job.
There are various methods available for assessing results, behavior and personal
characteristics of an employee. These methods can be used according to the particular
circumstances and requirements.
(ii) Communicating Job Expectations
The second step in the appraisal process is communicating to employees the measures and
standards which will be used in the appraisal process. Such communication should clarify
expectations and create a feeling of involvement.
(iii) Planning
In this stage, the manager plans for the realization of performance expectations, arranging for
the resources to be available which are required for attaining the goals set. This is an enabling
role.
(iv) Monitoring Performance
“Performance Appraisal” is a continuous process, involving ongoing feedback. Even though
performance is appraised annually, it has to be managed 'each day, all year long.' Monitoring
is a key part of the “Performance Appraisal” process. It should involve providing assistance
as necessary and removing obstacles rather than interfering. The best way to effectively
monitor is to walk around, thus creating continuous contacts, providing first-hand
information, and identifying problems, which can then be solved promptly.
(v) Appraising
This stage involves documenting performance through observing, recalling, evaluating,
written communication, judgment and analysis of data. This is like putting together an
appraisal record.
Page 11
Performance Appraisal of Union Bank
(vi) Feedback
After the formal appraisal stage, a feedback session is desirable. This session should involve
verbal communication, listening, problem solving, negotiating, compromising, conflict
resolution and reaching consensus.
(vii) Decision Making
On the basis of appraisal and feedback results, various decisions can be made about giving
rewards (e.g., promotion, incentives, etc.) and punishments (e.g., demotion). The outcome of
an appraisal system should also be used for career development.
(viii) Development of performance
The last stage of “Performance Appraisal” is 'development of performance,' or professional
development, by providing opportunities for upgrading skills and professional interactions.
This can be done by supporting participation in professional conferences or by providing
opportunities for further study. Such opportunities can also act as incentives or rewards to
employees.
The ESSENTIALS of an effective performance system are as follows:
Documentation – means continuous noting and documenting the performance. It also helps the evaluators to give a proof and the basis of their ratings.
Standards / Goals – the standards set should be clear, easy to understand, achievable, motivating, time bound and measurable.
Practical and simple format - The appraisal format should be simple, clear, fair and
objective. Long and complicated formats are time consuming, difficult to understand, and do
not elicit much useful information.
WHAT SHOULD A PERFORMANCE SYSTEM BE?
Correlated with the organization's philosophies and mission
Cover assessment of performance as well as potential for development
Look after the needs of both the individual and the organization
Help create a clean environment
Page 12
Performance Appraisal of Union Bank
Rewards linked to achievements
Generate information for personnel development and career planning
suggesting appropriate person-task matching
HOW CAN THE “PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL” SYSTEM HELP?
Promote better understanding of an employee's role and clarity about his or her
functions
Give a better understanding of personal strengths and weaknesses in relation to
expected roles and functions
Identify development needs of an employee
Establish common ground between the employee and the supervisor
Increase communication
Provide an employee with the opportunity for self-reflection and individual goal
setting
Help an employee internalize the culture, norms and values of the organization. This
helps develop an identity with and commitment to the organization and prepares an
employee for higher-level positions in the hierarchy
Assist in a variety of personnel decisions
APPROACHES IN “PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL”
Intuitive
Self-appraisal
Group
Trait
Achievement of results
TECHNIQUES OF “PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL”
Easy appraisal method
Graphic rating scales
Field review method
Forced choice rating method
Page 13
Performance Appraisal of Union Bank
Critical incident appraisal method
Management by objectives
Work standard approach
Ranking methods
“PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL” SYSTEMS
PROBLEMS
Measurement Judgement Policy Organization
Deciding what to
evaluate
Appraising
performance
Using the results of the
appraisal
Recognizing how
managers work and
the organization
culture
SYMPTOMS
Ambiguity in roles
and responsibilities
of each job
Job performance is
difficult to quantify
No clear statement
of overall objectives
of units or the
organization
Appraisal contains
only numerical
indices
Disagreement on
ratings
Official review
changes ratings
Appeals,
grievances,
accusations of bias,
discrimination
Top management
fails to reward
managers who are
excellent in staff
assessment and
development
Marginal performers
receive promotions or
salary increases
Appraisal forms
not completed
Managers com
plain about time
needed
System seen as
belonging to the
designers, not the
users
Personnel/HR
specialists take
enforcer not adviser
role
system revised
frequently
POTENTIAL CURES
Page 14
Performance Appraisal of Union Bank
Job analysis and
credible job
description
Outcomes of each
job identified
Overall goals set
for units and the
organization
Train managers to
make documented
judgements
Observable,
behaviorally based
criteria
Performance
documented over
time
rater training and
practice
Effective
communication of
performance
expectations
Top management
actually uses
“Performance
Appraisal” itself
Polices for
“Performance
Appraisal” consistently
applied
performance-
contingent reward
system operates
Implement
“Performance
Appraisal” using the
Performance
Management (PM)
Page 15
Performance Appraisal of Union Bank
Page 16
Performance Appraisal of Union Bank
CHAPTER II
Literature Review
Prashanta Athma (2000), in his Ph D research submitted at Usmania University
Hyderabad, “Performance of Public Sector Banks – A Case Study of State Bank of
Hyderabad, made an attempt to evaluate the performance of Public Sector
Commercial Banks with special emphasis on State Bank of Hyderabad. The period of
the study for evaluation of performance is from 1980 to 1993-94, a little more than a
decade. In this study, Athma outlined the Growth and Progress of Commercial
Banking in India and. analyzed the trends in deposits, various components of profits
of SBH, examined the trends in Asset structure, evaluated the level of customer
satisfaction and compared the performance of SBH with other PSBs, Associate Banks
of SBI and SBI. Statistical techniques like Ratios, Percentages, Compound Annual
rate of growth and averages are computed for the purpose of meaningful comparison
and analysis. The major findings of this study are that since nationalization, the
progress of banking in India has been very impressive. All three types of Deposits
have continuously grown during the study period, though the rate of growth was
highest in fixed deposits. A comparison of SBH performance in respect of resource
mobilization with other banks showed that the average growth of deposits of SBH is
higher than any other bank group. Profits of SBH showed an increasing trend
indicating a more than proportionate increase in spread than in burden. Finally,
majority of the customers have given a very positive opinion about the various
statements relating to counter service offered by SBH.
Zacharias Thomas(1997)Ph D Thesis, ‘Performance effectiveness of Nationalised
Bank- A Case Study of Syndicate Bank’, submitted to Kochin University (1997),
Thesis studied the performance effectiveness of Nationalized Bank by taking
Syndicate Bank as case study in his Ph.D thesis. Thomas has examined various
aspects like growth and development of banking industry, achievements of Syndicate
Bank in relation to capital adequacy, quality of assets, Profitability, Social Banking,
Growth, Productivity, Customer Service and also made a comparative analysis of 'the
performance effectiveness of Syndicate Bank in relation to Nationalized bank. A
period of ten years from 1984 to 1993-94 is taken for the study. This study is
Page 17
Performance Appraisal of Union Bank
undertaken to review and analyze the performance effectiveness of Syndicate Bank
and other Nationalized banks in India using an Economic Managerial-Efficiency
Evaluation Model (EMEE Model) developed by researcher. Thomas in this study
found that Syndicate Bank got 5th Position in Capital adequacy and quality of assets,
15th in Profitability, 14th Position in Social Banking, 8th in Growth, 7th in
Productivity and 15th position in Customer Service among the nationalized banks.
Further, he found that five nationalized banks showed low health performance, seven
low priority performance and eleven low efficiency performance in comparison with
Syndicate Bank.
Singh R (2003), in his paper Profitability management in banks under deregulate
environment, IBA bulletin, No25, has analyzed profitability management of banks
under the deregulated environment with some financial parameters of the major four
bank groups i.e. public sector banks, old private sector banks, new private sector
banks and foreign banks, profitability has declined in the deregulated environment.
He emphasized to make the banking sector competitive in the deregulated
environment. They should prefer non-interest income sources.
Singla HK (2008), in his paper,’ financial performance of banks in India,’in
ICFAI Journal of Bank Management No 7, has examined that how financial
management plays a crucial role in the growth of banking. It is concerned with
examining the profitability position of the selected sixteen banks of banker index for a
period of six years (2001-06). The study reveals that the profitability position was
reasonable during the period of study when compared with the previous years. Strong
capital position and balance sheet place, Banks in better position to deal with and
absorb the economic constant over a period of time.
Das and Udaykumar Lal (2002), in his book Banking Reforms in Lead Bank
Scheme, (Deep and Deep Publication, new Delhi) was the critical evaluation of the
lead bank scheme in the light of banking sector reforms. Das in this book observed
that high level of NPAs, large number of un-remunerative branches, low productivity,
overstaff and archaic methods of operations have affected the profitability of public
sector banks. Das sincerely felt that the whole banking sector in India is to be
Page 18
Performance Appraisal of Union Bank
revolutionized to cope with the changing dimensions of the satellite one world.
Further, he felt that the backward areas should be given more funds for investment in
priority sectors and more and more people should be brought under its coverage and
the procedures of extending credit should be simplified and there should be least
hassle cost.
Subramanian and Swami (1994) in their paper, Comparative performance of
publc sector banks in india” Prjanan, Vol. XXII, have analyzed and compared the
efficiency in six public sector banks, four private sector and three foreign banks for
the year 1996-97. Operational efficiency is calculatedin terms of total business and
salary expenditure per employee. The analysis revealed that higher per employee
salary level need not result in poor efficiency and business per employee efficiency
co-efficient was also calculated. Among the PSBs, Bank of Baroda registered the high
efficiency and operating profit per employee. Among the private sector banks Indus
Bank followed by Citibank Registered highest and second highest operating profit per
employee respectively. However, among the Nationalized Banks there existed wide
variations in efficiency. Frequent changes are order of the day for the topics of this
nature. Therefore, one should rely on latest information. Some organizations like,
RBI, IBA, SBI and ICRA have carried out several research studies on various issues
relating to banking and exclusive banking journals/periodicals like Bank Quest, The
Bankers, RBI occasional papers, RBI bulletins and general magazines like Business
Today, Business India, Finance India, have been publishing papers on various aspects
like NPAs, capital adequacy, branch expansion, credit dispensation, deposit
mobilization, service quality, technology, performance evaluation, etc. Same studies
and papers suitable to this study are being reviewed here.
SBI Research Department in 2000, through its paper “Performance analysis of
27 Public sector banks” published in SBI monthly review performance, Vol
XXXIX, was prepared by Economic Research Department of State Bank of India,
is to analyze the Performance of the 27 Public Sector Banks for the year 1999-2000
vis-a-vis the preceding year. Selecting four different categories of indicators-Business
Performance, Efficiency, Vulnerability and labor productivity indicators, carried out
the analysis. Altogether, 39 indicators were selected for this purpose. For the purpose
Page 19
Performance Appraisal of Union Bank
of analysis, 27 PSBs disaggregated into four groups, namely, the SBI, ABs (7), the
SBGs (8), the NBs (19). During 1999-2000, the PSBs exhibited better show in terms
of several parameters studied above. Nevertheless, the problems of NPAs and capital
adequacy remain to be taken care of. Researchers in this paper opinioned that greater
operational flexibility and functional autonomy should be given to PSBs especially to
strengthen their capital base. Further, they felt that since net interest margin will
continue to remain compressed in a deregulated interest rate regime, a lot of effect
would have to be made to mitigate this through generation of non-interest income. As
far as NPAs are concerned, they believe' that, the outdated laws and regulations that
pose hindrance to banks in getting back their dues need to be suitably amended.
In a paper published in the Financial Express in 2004, titled “India’s Best
Banks” has been doing for several years through its annual exercise to evaluate and
rate Indian banks. They claim that this survey is a comprehensive one, which
evaluates the performance of private, public, Indian, and foreign Banks operating in
India. With the objective of making the comparison more meaningful, Banks were
categorized into Public Sector Banks, New Private Sector Banks and Foreign Banks.
Financial information for the year ending March 31st, 2002 and March 31, 2003
relating to each of the banks falling into the aforesaid categories was collected from
the data available from RBI. Five major criteria were identified against which the
banks were ranked. 'These criteria are (1) Strength and soundness (ii) Growth, (iii)
Profitability, (iv) Efficiency/Productivity, and (v) Credit quality. Considering the
current banking, industrial and over-all economic scenario, pertinent weights were
assigned to each of the major criteria. In the first category of "State-Run" or Public
Sector Banks, State Bank of Patiala and Andhra Bank is the top two. In the category
of best old private sector banks, the magazine ranks the Jammu and Kashmir Bank
and Karur Vysya Bank as the first best and second best. In the category of 'New'
Private Banks, HDFC as number one and ICICI Bank at number two. Finally, in the
category of Foreign Banks, the magazine ranks Standard Chartered Bank and Citi
Bank at the top two slots.
Page 20
Performance Appraisal of Union Bank
CHAPTER III
Data Analysis
1. Are you aware of the objective of the performance appraisal system?
OPTIONSNO OF
RESPONDENT(SAMPLE SIZE 50)
PERCENTAGE
VERY MUCH42 84%
SOME WHAT7 14%
DON’T KNOW1 2%
very much some what don't know0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
INTERPRITATION- 84% Employees are aware of the object of the performance appraisal system.
Page 21
Performance Appraisal of Union Bank
2. Performance appraisal helps the organization in achieving goal.
OPTIONSNOS OF RESPONDENT(Sample size 50)
PERCENTAGE
YES 38 76%
NO 10 20%
DON’T KNOW 2 4%
yes no don't know0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
INTERPRITATION - 76% Employees say yes that performance
appraisal helps the organization in achieving goal.
Page 22
Performance Appraisal of Union Bank
3. Hold meeting in the beginning of the year to explain & clarify activity task & goals to be achieved.
OPTIONSNOS OF RESPONDENT(Sample size 50)
PERCENTAGE
YES 39 78%
NO 11 22%
yes no0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
INTERPRITATION-: 78% Employees say that yes organized meetings helps goal and task. While the other 22% employees that is not very much helpful.
Page 23
Performance Appraisal of Union Bank
4. Organization has to make a fixed duration for performance appraisal.
OPTIONSNOS OF RESPONDENT (Sample size 50)
PERCENTAGE
YES 40 80%
NO 10 20%
yes no0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
INTERPRITATION -: 80% Employees agree with that is organization should have
to make a fixed duration for performance appraisal. While the other 20% employees
do not agree with this statement.
Page 24
Performance Appraisal of Union Bank
5. Satisfied for point allocation on the basis of KRA’s & managerial dimension.
OPTIONSNOS OF RESPONDENT(Sample size 50)
PERCENTAGE
FULLY SATISFIED 20 40%
SATISFIED 26 52%
DISSATISFIED 2 4%
UNCERTAIN 2 4%
fully satisfied satisfied dissatisfied uncertain0
10
20
30
40
50
60
INTERPRITATION-: 40% Employees are fully satisfied for point allocation on the
basis of KRA’s and managerial dimension.
Page 25
Performance Appraisal of Union Bank
6. Performance appraisal affects the working efficiency of employees.
OPTIONSNOS OF RESPONDENT(Sample size 50)
PERCENTAGE
YES 42 84%
NO 8 16%
yes no0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
INTERPRITATION-: 84% Employees say that yes performance appraisal system affect the working efficiency of employee. While the other 16% employees do not agree with this statement.
Page 26
Performance Appraisal of Union Bank
7. Appraisal system is able to develop high result orientation approach.
OPTIONSNOS OF RESPONDENT(Sample size 50)
PERCENTAGE
YES 47 94%
NO 3 6%
yes no0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
INTERPRITATION-: 94% Employees say that yes the appraisal system is able to
develop high result orientation approach. While the other 6% employees do not agree
with us.
Page 27
Performance Appraisal of Union Bank
8. The systems will also contribution in potential appraisal.
OPTIONSNOS OF RESPONDENT(Sample size 50)
PERCENTAGE
YES36 72%
NO10 20%
DON’T KNOW4 8%
yes no don't know0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
INTERPRITATION-: 72% employees think that the systems will also Contribution
in potential appraisal.
Page 28
Performance Appraisal of Union Bank
9. Promotion process in the organization is based on –
OPTIONSNOS OF RESPONDENT(Sample size 50)
PERCENTAGE
PERFORMANCE 2 4%
EXPERIENCE 6 12%
BOTH 42 84%
Performance experience both0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
INTERPRITATION-: 4% employees say that promotion says that process in the organization is based on performance, 12% employees say that based on experience and 84% say both.
Page 29
Performance Appraisal of Union Bank
10 .The present performance appraisal system is transparent & Free from bias.
OPTIONSNOS OF RESPONDENT(Sample size 50)
PERCENTAGE
YES 42 84%
NO 8 16%
YES NO0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
INTERPRITATION-: 84% Employees agree with this statement that the
present performance appraisal system is transparent and free from bias.
Page 30
Performance Appraisal of Union Bank
11 .Satisfied with the current performance appraisal system.
OPTIONSNOS OF
RESPONDENT(Sample size 50)
PERCENTAGE
HIGHLY SATISFIED 27 54%
SATISFIED 18 36%
DISSATISFIED 1 2%
JUST SATISFIED 4 8%
Highly satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Just satisfied0
10
20
30
40
50
60
INTERPRITATION-: 54% Employees are highly satisfied with the current Performance
appraisal system. While 36% employees are satisfied with the current performance appraisal