Top Banner
Unintentional vs. intentional impacts No impact strategy Attacker’s strategy maximizing the expected damage
12

Unintentional vs. intentional impacts No impact strategy Attacker’s strategy maximizing the expected damage.

Dec 20, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Unintentional vs. intentional impacts No impact strategy Attacker’s strategy maximizing the expected damage.

Unintentional vs. intentional impacts

No impact strategy

Attacker’s strategy maximizing the

expected damage

Page 2: Unintentional vs. intentional impacts No impact strategy Attacker’s strategy maximizing the expected damage.

Basic Definitions

lowest-level part of system, which is characterized by its inherent value, availability and performance distribution

collection of elements with the same functionality connected in parallel in reliability logic-diagram sense

quantitative measure of task performing intensity of element or system (capacity, productivity, processing speed, task completion time etc.)

Page 3: Unintentional vs. intentional impacts No impact strategy Attacker’s strategy maximizing the expected damage.

Basic Definitionstechnical or organizational measure aimed at reduction of destruction probability of a group of system elements in the case of attack

action aimed at preventing simultaneous destruction of several elements in the case of single attack (can be performed by spatial dispersion, by encapsulating different elements into different protective casings, by using different power sources etc.)

group of system elements separated from other elements (and possibly protected) so that a single external impact destroying elements belonging to a certain group cannot destroy elements

from other groups

object that imitates protected group of system elements, but does not contain any element (the total damage caused by the destruction of any false target is much lower than the damage

caused by the destruction of any protection group)

Page 4: Unintentional vs. intentional impacts No impact strategy Attacker’s strategy maximizing the expected damage.

Defense strategyDamageSeparation

Protection

Destruction probability

False targets

Impact probability

Disinformationpp

gg

vv

Page 5: Unintentional vs. intentional impacts No impact strategy Attacker’s strategy maximizing the expected damage.

Defense Strategy

F

nM

mnnm ΦΦ

1,

|)|,( nmnmn bo dF

|)|,(),,(1 1

nm

N

n

nM

mnmnodFFO

Defense Strategy Cost

Page 6: Unintentional vs. intentional impacts No impact strategy Attacker’s strategy maximizing the expected damage.

Expected damage model

Cumulative performance of the

group

Attack probabilityProtection vulnerability

System performance

reduction

Equipment losses

Expected damage

Failures

ppvvgg

Functional losses

Page 7: Unintentional vs. intentional impacts No impact strategy Attacker’s strategy maximizing the expected damage.

S

sss Wgc,,qW,,,C

1),()()( γβαγβα

Expected Damage Cost

ss g,,q ,)( γβα

Wg

WgW,gc

s

ss ,

,0)(

WggW

WgW,gc

ss

ss

),(

,0)(

Unsupplied demand

Loss of demand

Page 8: Unintentional vs. intentional impacts No impact strategy Attacker’s strategy maximizing the expected damage.

).()()()(11

,W,,ChHvHFF,,DnmΦknknm

nM

mnmnnm

N

nFF γβαγ,βα

Expected Damage Cost

Destruction of false targets

System destruction

Protections and infrastructure

Elements Functional losses

min})())((arg{* ,F,,D,F,O,F, γβαγβ*γ*β

Optimal defense strategy

*))(1())(( O,F,O,F,O γβγβ Limited defense budget

)())(( ,F,O,F,O γβγβ Unlimited defense budget

Page 9: Unintentional vs. intentional impacts No impact strategy Attacker’s strategy maximizing the expected damage.

Single attack strategy

Perfect knowledge about the system

No knowledge about the system

p=p=11/N/N

p=p=11

pp

Imperfect knowledge about the system

pppp

pi=1

Page 10: Unintentional vs. intentional impacts No impact strategy Attacker’s strategy maximizing the expected damage.

Multiple attack strategyUnlimited resource

p=p=11

pppp

pp

Limited resource + perfect knowledge about the system

p=p=11

Limited resource + imperfect knowledge about the system

pi>1

Page 11: Unintentional vs. intentional impacts No impact strategy Attacker’s strategy maximizing the expected damage.

Attacker’s Strategy

Single Attack

.111

F

nM

mnm

N

nF

Perfect attacker’s knowledge about the system

max})),(({arg),(

);,(,0

1,1

γβα ,,mnDmn

mnF

nMmNn

Multiple Attacks

.111

FnM

mnm

N

nF

}),(,0

;),(,1{)(,0

mn

mn

nm

nmF

max}))((arg{ γβ,,D

.)),((11 1

EmnN

n

nM

m

Page 12: Unintentional vs. intentional impacts No impact strategy Attacker’s strategy maximizing the expected damage.

Attacker’s Strategy

Single Attack

)/(11

N

nnnmF MF

No knowledge about the system

Multiple Attacks

)/(1

N

nnnmF MFE

Limited resource (E attacks)

Unlimited resource

1 nmF

Imperfect knowledge about the system

D,,mnDnm /)),(( γβα

max}))((arg{, max rD,,D γβ

,)),((11 1

EmnN

n

nM

m