Top Banner
Understanding TIF University Heights City Council April 28, 2015 Peter Fisher The Iowa Policy Project
16

Understanding TIF University Heights City Council April 28, 2015 Peter Fisher The Iowa Policy Project.

Dec 18, 2015

Download

Documents

Duane Cole
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Understanding TIF University Heights City Council April 28, 2015 Peter Fisher The Iowa Policy Project.

Understanding TIF

University Heights City CouncilApril 28, 2015

Peter FisherThe Iowa Policy Project

Page 2: Understanding TIF University Heights City Council April 28, 2015 Peter Fisher The Iowa Policy Project.

How TIF Works$2 m building built in 2011 on a $.5 m lot

0

1,000,000

2,000,000

3,000,000

Total Valu-ation

No TIF

FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY170

1,000,000

2,000,000

3,000,000

TIF Increment

Base value

TIF Cre-ated in 2011 or 2012

Page 3: Understanding TIF University Heights City Council April 28, 2015 Peter Fisher The Iowa Policy Project.

How TIF Diverts Taxes

City Tax:

$40,000

County Tax:

$20,000

School Tax:

$45,0000

City General Fund

County Funds

School Funds

$10,000

$30,0000

$5,000

$15,000

$15,000

$30,000

CityTIF

Fund

$75,000

TAXES COLLECTED

WHERE TAXES END UP

Page 4: Understanding TIF University Heights City Council April 28, 2015 Peter Fisher The Iowa Policy Project.

The Original Rationale for TIF

• To be used in blighted urban neighborhoods.• Recognizes that cities, not schools or counties,

have the major responsibility for facilitating and regulating development.

• Cities assume some risk in financing or assisting the redevelopment of blighted areas.

• But if the redevelopment is a success, schools and counties benefit from higher tax base.

• So: TIF allows cities to be repaid for their investment first; then when the project is paid for, the TIF ends and the tax base is fully available to all local governments.

Page 5: Understanding TIF University Heights City Council April 28, 2015 Peter Fisher The Iowa Policy Project.

Solon TIF

Areas

Page 6: Understanding TIF University Heights City Council April 28, 2015 Peter Fisher The Iowa Policy Project.

In Three Cities, Over Half of the Tax Base is tiffed

Iowa City

Solon

North Liberty

Lone Tree

Swisher

Coralville

Oxford

Shueyville

Tiffin

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

0.9%

18.5%

18.6%

24.0%

27.4%

39.7%

50.7%

55.4%

56.7%

Page 7: Understanding TIF University Heights City Council April 28, 2015 Peter Fisher The Iowa Policy Project.

TIF as a Cash Cow: Share of Property Taxes from TIF

Hills

University Heights

Iowa City

North Liberty

Solon

Lone Tree

Coralville

Swisher

Oxford

Tiffin

Shueyville

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

0.0%

0.0%

1.7%

37.5%

39.9%

47.6%

58.5%

58.6%

75.4%

78.0%

83.8%

Page 8: Understanding TIF University Heights City Council April 28, 2015 Peter Fisher The Iowa Policy Project.

For Some Cities, the TIF Fund has become a Second General Fund or

a Substitute for the Debt Fund

ShueyvilleFiscal Year 2012

TIF fund is over 5 times as large as the general fund.

What TIF revenue is used for:• City hall/community

center• 12th street project

Page 9: Understanding TIF University Heights City Council April 28, 2015 Peter Fisher The Iowa Policy Project.

Overlying

Entities Means TIF will

Shift Taxes

Outside the City

Page 10: Understanding TIF University Heights City Council April 28, 2015 Peter Fisher The Iowa Policy Project.

How TIF Shifts TaxesSchool Taxpayers$6 million

$6 Million

School District:$10 millionspendingauthority

Without TIF

State Aid $4 Million

School District:$10 millionspendingauthority

School Taxpayers:$7.1 million

State Aid

City TIF$2 Million

$5.1 Million

$4.9 Million

With TIF

Page 11: Understanding TIF University Heights City Council April 28, 2015 Peter Fisher The Iowa Policy Project.

Percent of Property Taxes from Outside the City

Iowa City

North Liberty

Solon

Lone Tree

Coralville

Swisher

Oxford

Tiffin

Shueyville

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

0.6%

23.2%

24.1%

30.7%

30.8%

42.0%

48.1%

48.8%

62.1%

Page 12: Understanding TIF University Heights City Council April 28, 2015 Peter Fisher The Iowa Policy Project.

Coralville TIF Areas

Coral Ridge Mall – Highway

6 Combined Area (blue)

Other Areas (cross-hatch)

TIF $

Page 13: Understanding TIF University Heights City Council April 28, 2015 Peter Fisher The Iowa Policy Project.

Mall/6 TIF: Where Taxes Go, With and Without TIF Diversion

Without TIF With TIF

4,963,320 2,289,052

6,660,283

14,839,644

7,407,516

2,418,891

Kirkwood & Other

School Districts

City of Coralville

Johnson County

Page 14: Understanding TIF University Heights City Council April 28, 2015 Peter Fisher The Iowa Policy Project.

Mall/6 TIF Forces County & School Property Taxes Higher

School District

Iowa CityClear Creek

AmanaIncrease in levy rate ($ per thousand)

School tax $0.34 $2.83County tax 0.45 0.45 Other countywide taxes 0.06 0.11 Total $0.85 $3.40

Additional Property Taxes on anaverage ($200,000) home $80 $319

Page 15: Understanding TIF University Heights City Council April 28, 2015 Peter Fisher The Iowa Policy Project.

Responsible TIF Use• Project Based: All diverted revenues are used

to repay the costs of the original project causing the development (e.g., infrastructure for Coral Ridge) or are rebated to developer (e.g., Plaza Towers in I.C.)

• When those project costs are paid, the TIF diversion ends.

• Rebates do not exceed what is justified• No continued use of TIF to finance projects

elsewhere that couldn’t stand on their own. • No use of TIF to pay general costs of city

government, tax exempt facilities, lobbyists, etc.

Page 16: Understanding TIF University Heights City Council April 28, 2015 Peter Fisher The Iowa Policy Project.

Questions to Ask• Will the project itself generate sufficient

revenue to pay the TIF project costs? (If it is a rebate, the answer is yes.)

• Is there a public benefit from this project, or are there features that the city is demanding that the developer would not otherwise incorporate?

• Does the project really need incentives, or does it need all of the incentives requested?

• If it does need incentives to be profitable, why should the city subsidize a project that the market cannot support?