Understanding the Six Different Styles of Leadership

the sixdifferent styles of leadership

U N D E R S T A N D I N G

P E P P E R R U T L A N D

ALEADER.

As I shared in my last presentation, thereare qualities which make for greatleadership; but, just as people aredifferent, there is not one type of greatleader.

THEDIFFERENCES

In fact, there are multiple types ofleadership, six of which I've highlightedhere to provide examples and to helpaspiring leaders better understand thestrengths and weaknesses of eachapproach.

Does not involve employees in decisions, butmay allow them to choose how to deal withthem once they're made.

AUTOCRATICLEADERSHIP

Strength: Saves time and allows everyone to focus on theirown tasks.

Weakness: Not beneficial if employees know more than theleader, or the leader is experienced.

Democratic leadership involves employees infinal decisions that will be made by the leader,taking and synthesizing the best of advice.

DEMOCRATICLEADERSHIP

Strength: Keeps employees engaged, inspires creativity.

Weakness: Can be time consuming and is not good for thingsthat require immediate turnarounds.

Offer rewards in exchange for completedwork, and punishment when things aren't doneto their liking.

TRANSACTIONALLEADERSHIP

Strength: Increases value for employees that perform well.

Weakness: Can create a culture of fear and low morale

This style of leader puts all in the abilities ofhis team, and allows them to do as they will,often without any questions.

LAISSEZ-FAIRELEADERSHIP

Strength: Great for employees who are able to self-manage

Weakness: Those who are used to being told what to do maybe less productive.

This leader values transparency andcommunication, and will often provide updateson progress and frequent reminders.

TRANSFORMATIONALLEADERSHIP

Strength: Makes employers comfortable to share as well

Weakness: Could be overwhelming to constantly receiveinformation over which one doesn't have control

Situational leader acts as a coach toemployees. S/he is willing to mentor andencourage employees along the way ofachieving goals.

SITUATIONALLEADERSHIP

Strength: Great for learning and professional development.

Weakness: Employees may become dependent on leadershipin order to perform

V I S I Twww . p e p p e r r u t l a n d . n e t

F O R M O R E T I P S O NL E A D E R S H I P