Top Banner
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 1 Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey Ger Snijkers Martin Luppes Barbara Berkenbosch Statistics Netherlands Division of Business Statistics
30

Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Jan 03, 2016

Download

Documents

elizabeth-stout

Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey. Ger Snijkers Martin Luppes Barbara Berkenbosch Statistics Netherlands Division of Business Statistics. Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Survey. Models: 1.Groves & Couper (1998) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 1

Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Ger SnijkersMartin Luppes

Barbara Berkenbosch

Statistics NetherlandsDivision of Business Statistics

Page 2: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 2

Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Survey

Models:

1. Groves & Couper (1998)

2. Willimack, Nichols & Sudman (2002)

3. Hedlin, Dale, Haraldsen & Jones (2005)

4. Snijkers (2007)

Page 3: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 3

Response• In time• Complete• Correct

De

cis

ion

to p

articip

ate

An

sw

erin

g b

eh

av

iou

r

Motivation

Respondentburden:

• De facto • Perception

• More than one survey• More than once• in other ways: ○ registers ○ XBRL

Internal business factors:• Policy• Data• Resources• Market position

Informant:• Mandate• Data knowledge• Job priority

External Business factors:• Econ. climate• Regulatory requirements• Political climate

Image

A business

The survey:• Topic• Population and sample• Sponsor / Survey organisation• Resources• Planning• Authority/confidentiality

The survey design

Co

nta

cts

trateg

y

Qu

es

tion

naire

Mo

de

s of d

atac

olle

ction

Statistical picture of a country

NSI NSI

Page 4: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 4

Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Survey

1. The perspective of the business

2. The perspective of a NSI

Page 5: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 5

Response• In time• Complete• Correct

De

cis

ion

to p

articip

ate

An

sw

erin

g b

eh

av

iou

r

Motivation

Respondentburden:

• De facto • Perception

• More than one survey• More than once• in other ways: ○ registers ○ XBRL

Internal business factors:• Policy• Data• Resources• Market position

Informant:• Mandate• Data knowledge• Job priority

External business factors:• Econ. climate• Regulatory requirements• Political climate

Image

A business

The survey:• Topic• Population and sample• Sponsor / Survey organisation• Resources• Planning• Authority/confidentiality

The survey design

Co

nta

cts

trateg

y

Qu

es

tion

naire

Mo

de

s of d

atac

olle

ction

Statistical picture of a country

NSI NSI

Page 6: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 6

Request to Participate:Reactions by Businesses

• “What is the use of this survey?It is pointless!”

• “There is no connection with my business activities.”

• “It only costs money and time!”“The costs outweigh the added value.”“There is no added value.”

• “The tone of voice is irritating; in stead of emphasizing the why of surveys, CBS poses threats of penalties in her correspondence.”

Page 7: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 7

Request to Participate:Reactions by Businesses

Conclusion (The Netherlands):

Statistical obligations are considered as the administrative burden that irritates entrepreneurs the most,

despite the fact that statistical obligations are not even mentioned in the summary of the main causes for administrative burden.

Page 8: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 8

Request to Participate:Reactions by Businesses

Conclusion (The Netherlands) con’d:

Businesses want to get rid of the obligations that are most removed from their own business processes.

As soon as they do see the value of these obligations, and there is a connection with their business activities, the irritation decreases immediately.

Page 9: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 9

Request to Participate

What can we do?

The perspective of a NSI

Page 10: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 10

Response• In time• Complete• Correct

De

cis

ion

to p

articip

ate

An

sw

erin

g b

eh

av

iou

r

Motivation

Respondentburden:

• De facto • Perception

• More than one survey• More than once• in other ways: ○ registers ○ XBRL

Internal business factors:• Policy• Data• Resources• Market position

Informant:• Mandate• Data knowledge• Job priority

External Business factors:• Econ. climate• Regulatory requirements• Political climate

Image

A business

The survey:• Topic• Population and sample• Sponsor / Survey organisation• Resources• Planning• Authority/confidentiality

The survey design

Co

nta

cts

trateg

y

Qu

es

tion

naire

Mo

de

s of d

atac

olle

ction

Statistical picture of a country

NSI NSI

Page 11: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 11

Request to Participate

What can we do?

Tailoring the survey design!• Mode of data collection

- “I will participate when I get a paper/internetquestionnaire.”

• Questionnaire design- “The questionnaire is too complicated to

complete.”

• Contact strategy

Page 12: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 12

Tailoring the Survey Design:Contact Strategy

Communicating your survey = essential

in influencing the motivation of a business respondent to participate

Page 13: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 13

Influencing Survey Participation:Compliance Principles

1. Reciprocation

2. Consistency

3. Social validation

4. Authority

5. Scarcity

6. Liking

Groves, Cialdini & Couper (POQ, Winter, 1992)

Page 14: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 14

Influencing Survey Participation:Compliance Principles

1. Reciprocation“One should be more willing to comply with a request to the extent that the compliance constitutes the repayment of a perceived gift, favor, or concession.”

• “What is in it for me.”• “It only costs me.”• “I want you to repay me for the costs I’ve made

to complete this questionnaire.”

Page 15: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 15

Influencing Survey Participation:Compliance Principles

2. Commitment & Consistency“After committing oneself to a position, one should be more willing to comply with requests for behaviors that are consistent with that position.”

• “I will comply with requests from the government.”• “I am a responsible entrepreneur towards society.”• “Your statistics are not useful for me.”• “Explain to me why this is useful?” • “I will not participate unless the topic is of interest.”

Page 16: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 16

Influencing Survey Participation:Compliance Principles

3. Social validation“One should be more willing to comply with a requests to the degree that one believes that similar others would comply with it.”

• “My trading organization has a negative attitudetowards surveys. So have I.”

• “My trading organization is positive aboutparticipating in your surveys. So I will.”

• “The political party I vote for is in favor of reducingbusiness survey burden.

That is why I do not participate.”

Page 17: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 17

Influencing Survey Participation:Compliance Principles

4. Authority“One should be more willing to yield to the requests of someone whom one perceives as a legitimate authority.”

• “The survey is mandatory. So I cooperate.If I don’t, I will be fined.”

• “The request comes from the government.”

Page 18: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 18

Influencing Survey Participation:Compliance Principles

5. Scarcity“One should be more willing to comply with requests to secure opportunities that are scarce.”

• “My response is important, since there are notmany companies like mine.”

• “Once CBS has located you, it will not let you go.”• “I am not unique. Take another one. • “I am not relevant for you.”

Page 19: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 19

Influencing Survey Participation:Compliance Principles

6. Liking“One should be more willing to comply with the requests of liked others.”

• “The statistical obligations are considered as theadministrative burden that irritates entrepreneursthe most.”- SN = statistics => SN ≠ likable organisation

• “SN is not customer-oriented”• Personal contact is helpful

Page 20: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 20

Compliance Principles

businesses are sensitive to

1. Reciprocation +++

2. Consistency ++

3. Social validation +

4. Authority +++

5. Scarcity –

6. Liking ++

Page 21: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 21

Compliance Principlesused by businesses

• Literature review• Focus groups with

- Helpdesk - Interviewers:

business interviewers, CATI interviewers- Maintenance department- Data cleaning department

• Analysis of customer satisfaction inquiry• Analysis of inquiry on image of SN

Page 22: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 22

Compliance Principles

businesses are used by sensitive to Stats

Neth

1. Reciprocation +++

2. Consistency ++

3. Social validation +

4. Authority +++

5. Scarcity –

6. Liking ++

Page 23: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 23

Compliance Principles

businesses are used by sensitive to Stats

Neth

1. Reciprocation +++ –

2. Consistency ++ +

3. Social validation + –

4. Authority +++ +++

5. Scarcity – +

6. Liking ++ ++

Page 24: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 24

Compliance Principlesused by Stats Netherlands

Content analysis• Advance and reminder letters• CBS website• Helpdesk:

letters, e-mails, telephone calls• Interviewer protocols:

Business interviewers, CATI interviewers• Protocols of Maintenance department

Page 25: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 25

Compliance Principlesused by Stats Netherlands

1. Authority (+++) Mentioning Stats Netherlands Referring to CBS act:

Participation is mandatory by law, and non-response will be fined

Results will be used by the Dutch government, Eurostat, and other organisations

Response is due before a certain data

Page 26: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 26

Compliance Principlesused by Stats Netherlands

2. Liking (++) Envelope that needs no stamps Mentioning helpdesk “Thank you, in advance” Explaining confidentiality of use of data Trying to be friendly in the tone of voice Apologizing in reminder letters Explaining reminders

Page 27: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 27

Compliance Principlesused by Stats Netherlands

3. Commitment & consistency (+) Mentioning the name of the survey The why of the survey The importance of the survey

4. Scarcity (+) Unique opportunity: SN is dependent on the

response of a specific company. “Your response is important to us” Helping

Page 28: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 28

Compliance Principlesused by Stats Netherlands

Conclusions: This communication strategy is not effective in

influencing the respondent’s motivation to participate,

apart from the authority principle: - mandatory character of surveys- “Irritating”

Liking: We think we are friendly in our communication

SN is not considered a likable organization Businesses are not interested in questionnaires

and general statistics

Page 29: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 29

Response• In time• Complete• Correct

De

cis

ion

to p

articip

ate

An

sw

erin

g b

eh

av

iou

r

Motivation

Respondentburden:

• De facto • Perception

• More than one survey• More than once• in other ways: ○ registers ○ XBRL

Internal business factors:• Policy• Data• Resources• Market position

Informant:• Mandate• Data knowledge• Job priority

External Business factors:• Econ. climate• Regulatory requirements• Political climate

Image

A business

The survey:• Topic• Population and sample• Sponsor / Survey organisation• Resources• Planning• Authority/confidentiality

The survey design

Co

nta

cts

trateg

y

Qu

es

tion

naire

Mo

de

s of d

atac

olle

ction

Statistical picture of a country

NSI NSI

Page 30: Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey

Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 30

Compliance Principles:Conclusions Contact Strategy

To be effective, more use should be made of: Reciprocation (+++):

- make statistics useful for businesses- incentives (benchmarking)

Liking (++): - use the language of the businesses- do not treat them as numbers, but with respect- do not stress authority that much

Consistency & Commitment (++): - explain the necessity of statistics

Social validation (+): - cooperate with trading organizations- look for equal interests