Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 1 Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey Ger Snijkers Martin Luppes Barbara Berkenbosch Statistics Netherlands Division of Business Statistics
Jan 03, 2016
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 1
Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Business Survey
Ger SnijkersMartin Luppes
Barbara Berkenbosch
Statistics NetherlandsDivision of Business Statistics
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 2
Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Survey
Models:
1. Groves & Couper (1998)
2. Willimack, Nichols & Sudman (2002)
3. Hedlin, Dale, Haraldsen & Jones (2005)
4. Snijkers (2007)
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 3
Response• In time• Complete• Correct
De
cis
ion
to p
articip
ate
An
sw
erin
g b
eh
av
iou
r
Motivation
Respondentburden:
• De facto • Perception
• More than one survey• More than once• in other ways: ○ registers ○ XBRL
Internal business factors:• Policy• Data• Resources• Market position
Informant:• Mandate• Data knowledge• Job priority
External Business factors:• Econ. climate• Regulatory requirements• Political climate
Image
A business
The survey:• Topic• Population and sample• Sponsor / Survey organisation• Resources• Planning• Authority/confidentiality
The survey design
Co
nta
cts
trateg
y
Qu
es
tion
naire
Mo
de
s of d
atac
olle
ction
Statistical picture of a country
NSI NSI
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 4
Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Survey
1. The perspective of the business
2. The perspective of a NSI
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 5
Response• In time• Complete• Correct
De
cis
ion
to p
articip
ate
An
sw
erin
g b
eh
av
iou
r
Motivation
Respondentburden:
• De facto • Perception
• More than one survey• More than once• in other ways: ○ registers ○ XBRL
Internal business factors:• Policy• Data• Resources• Market position
Informant:• Mandate• Data knowledge• Job priority
External business factors:• Econ. climate• Regulatory requirements• Political climate
Image
A business
The survey:• Topic• Population and sample• Sponsor / Survey organisation• Resources• Planning• Authority/confidentiality
The survey design
Co
nta
cts
trateg
y
Qu
es
tion
naire
Mo
de
s of d
atac
olle
ction
Statistical picture of a country
NSI NSI
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 6
Request to Participate:Reactions by Businesses
• “What is the use of this survey?It is pointless!”
• “There is no connection with my business activities.”
• “It only costs money and time!”“The costs outweigh the added value.”“There is no added value.”
• “The tone of voice is irritating; in stead of emphasizing the why of surveys, CBS poses threats of penalties in her correspondence.”
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 7
Request to Participate:Reactions by Businesses
Conclusion (The Netherlands):
Statistical obligations are considered as the administrative burden that irritates entrepreneurs the most,
despite the fact that statistical obligations are not even mentioned in the summary of the main causes for administrative burden.
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 8
Request to Participate:Reactions by Businesses
Conclusion (The Netherlands) con’d:
Businesses want to get rid of the obligations that are most removed from their own business processes.
As soon as they do see the value of these obligations, and there is a connection with their business activities, the irritation decreases immediately.
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 9
Request to Participate
What can we do?
The perspective of a NSI
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 10
Response• In time• Complete• Correct
De
cis
ion
to p
articip
ate
An
sw
erin
g b
eh
av
iou
r
Motivation
Respondentburden:
• De facto • Perception
• More than one survey• More than once• in other ways: ○ registers ○ XBRL
Internal business factors:• Policy• Data• Resources• Market position
Informant:• Mandate• Data knowledge• Job priority
External Business factors:• Econ. climate• Regulatory requirements• Political climate
Image
A business
The survey:• Topic• Population and sample• Sponsor / Survey organisation• Resources• Planning• Authority/confidentiality
The survey design
Co
nta
cts
trateg
y
Qu
es
tion
naire
Mo
de
s of d
atac
olle
ction
Statistical picture of a country
NSI NSI
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 11
Request to Participate
What can we do?
Tailoring the survey design!• Mode of data collection
- “I will participate when I get a paper/internetquestionnaire.”
• Questionnaire design- “The questionnaire is too complicated to
complete.”
• Contact strategy
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 12
Tailoring the Survey Design:Contact Strategy
Communicating your survey = essential
in influencing the motivation of a business respondent to participate
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 13
Influencing Survey Participation:Compliance Principles
1. Reciprocation
2. Consistency
3. Social validation
4. Authority
5. Scarcity
6. Liking
Groves, Cialdini & Couper (POQ, Winter, 1992)
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 14
Influencing Survey Participation:Compliance Principles
1. Reciprocation“One should be more willing to comply with a request to the extent that the compliance constitutes the repayment of a perceived gift, favor, or concession.”
• “What is in it for me.”• “It only costs me.”• “I want you to repay me for the costs I’ve made
to complete this questionnaire.”
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 15
Influencing Survey Participation:Compliance Principles
2. Commitment & Consistency“After committing oneself to a position, one should be more willing to comply with requests for behaviors that are consistent with that position.”
• “I will comply with requests from the government.”• “I am a responsible entrepreneur towards society.”• “Your statistics are not useful for me.”• “Explain to me why this is useful?” • “I will not participate unless the topic is of interest.”
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 16
Influencing Survey Participation:Compliance Principles
3. Social validation“One should be more willing to comply with a requests to the degree that one believes that similar others would comply with it.”
• “My trading organization has a negative attitudetowards surveys. So have I.”
• “My trading organization is positive aboutparticipating in your surveys. So I will.”
• “The political party I vote for is in favor of reducingbusiness survey burden.
That is why I do not participate.”
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 17
Influencing Survey Participation:Compliance Principles
4. Authority“One should be more willing to yield to the requests of someone whom one perceives as a legitimate authority.”
• “The survey is mandatory. So I cooperate.If I don’t, I will be fined.”
• “The request comes from the government.”
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 18
Influencing Survey Participation:Compliance Principles
5. Scarcity“One should be more willing to comply with requests to secure opportunities that are scarce.”
• “My response is important, since there are notmany companies like mine.”
• “Once CBS has located you, it will not let you go.”• “I am not unique. Take another one. • “I am not relevant for you.”
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 19
Influencing Survey Participation:Compliance Principles
6. Liking“One should be more willing to comply with the requests of liked others.”
• “The statistical obligations are considered as theadministrative burden that irritates entrepreneursthe most.”- SN = statistics => SN ≠ likable organisation
• “SN is not customer-oriented”• Personal contact is helpful
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 20
Compliance Principles
businesses are sensitive to
1. Reciprocation +++
2. Consistency ++
3. Social validation +
4. Authority +++
5. Scarcity –
6. Liking ++
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 21
Compliance Principlesused by businesses
• Literature review• Focus groups with
- Helpdesk - Interviewers:
business interviewers, CATI interviewers- Maintenance department- Data cleaning department
• Analysis of customer satisfaction inquiry• Analysis of inquiry on image of SN
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 22
Compliance Principles
businesses are used by sensitive to Stats
Neth
1. Reciprocation +++
2. Consistency ++
3. Social validation +
4. Authority +++
5. Scarcity –
6. Liking ++
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 23
Compliance Principles
businesses are used by sensitive to Stats
Neth
1. Reciprocation +++ –
2. Consistency ++ +
3. Social validation + –
4. Authority +++ +++
5. Scarcity – +
6. Liking ++ ++
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 24
Compliance Principlesused by Stats Netherlands
Content analysis• Advance and reminder letters• CBS website• Helpdesk:
letters, e-mails, telephone calls• Interviewer protocols:
Business interviewers, CATI interviewers• Protocols of Maintenance department
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 25
Compliance Principlesused by Stats Netherlands
1. Authority (+++) Mentioning Stats Netherlands Referring to CBS act:
Participation is mandatory by law, and non-response will be fined
Results will be used by the Dutch government, Eurostat, and other organisations
Response is due before a certain data
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 26
Compliance Principlesused by Stats Netherlands
2. Liking (++) Envelope that needs no stamps Mentioning helpdesk “Thank you, in advance” Explaining confidentiality of use of data Trying to be friendly in the tone of voice Apologizing in reminder letters Explaining reminders
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 27
Compliance Principlesused by Stats Netherlands
3. Commitment & consistency (+) Mentioning the name of the survey The why of the survey The importance of the survey
4. Scarcity (+) Unique opportunity: SN is dependent on the
response of a specific company. “Your response is important to us” Helping
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 28
Compliance Principlesused by Stats Netherlands
Conclusions: This communication strategy is not effective in
influencing the respondent’s motivation to participate,
apart from the authority principle: - mandatory character of surveys- “Irritating”
Liking: We think we are friendly in our communication
SN is not considered a likable organization Businesses are not interested in questionnaires
and general statistics
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 29
Response• In time• Complete• Correct
De
cis
ion
to p
articip
ate
An
sw
erin
g b
eh
av
iou
r
Motivation
Respondentburden:
• De facto • Perception
• More than one survey• More than once• in other ways: ○ registers ○ XBRL
Internal business factors:• Policy• Data• Resources• Market position
Informant:• Mandate• Data knowledge• Job priority
External Business factors:• Econ. climate• Regulatory requirements• Political climate
Image
A business
The survey:• Topic• Population and sample• Sponsor / Survey organisation• Resources• Planning• Authority/confidentiality
The survey design
Co
nta
cts
trateg
y
Qu
es
tion
naire
Mo
de
s of d
atac
olle
ction
Statistical picture of a country
NSI NSI
Thursday, June 21, 2007 ICES3, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal 30
Compliance Principles:Conclusions Contact Strategy
To be effective, more use should be made of: Reciprocation (+++):
- make statistics useful for businesses- incentives (benchmarking)
Liking (++): - use the language of the businesses- do not treat them as numbers, but with respect- do not stress authority that much
Consistency & Commitment (++): - explain the necessity of statistics
Social validation (+): - cooperate with trading organizations- look for equal interests