Uncertainty Quantification in Climate Prediction Charles Jackson (1) Mrinal Sen (1) Gabriel Huerta (2) Yi Deng (1) Ken Bowman (3) (1)Institute for Geophysics, The University of Texas at Austin (2) Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New Mexico (3) Department of Atmospheric Science, Texas A&M University
26
Embed
Uncertainty Quantification in Climate Prediction Charles Jackson (1) Mrinal Sen (1) Gabriel Huerta (2) Yi Deng (1) Ken Bowman (3) (1)Institute for Geophysics,
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Uncertainty Quantification in Climate Prediction
Charles Jackson (1)Mrinal Sen (1)
Gabriel Huerta (2)Yi Deng (1)
Ken Bowman (3)
(1) Institute for Geophysics, The University of Texas at Austin(2) Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New
Mexico(3) Department of Atmospheric Science, Texas A&M University
(IPCC 2001)
clouds
Surface air temperature
(AchutaRao et al., 2004)
Where can clouds go wrong?
Address question using:
• Bayesian inference
• Stochastic sampling– Simulated annealing to focus sampling– Multiple search attempts for uncertainties
Are current approaches to climatemodel development convergent?
Posterior probability density for 3 parameters:
MVFSA
Metropolis
MVFSA
Metropolis
Grid Search
Target: Match observed climate 1990-2001
One 11-year climate model integration takes 11 hours over 64 processors of an Intel-based compute cluster.
Results
• Analysis of top six performing model configurations
• T42 CAM3.1, forced by observed SST March 1990 to February 2001.
• ~400 experiments completed (so far).
Histogram of configurations with Improved skill
Convergence in predictions of global means does not imply predictions
are correct.
Much improved simulation of rain intensities over tropics.
climateprediction.net
27,000 experiments completed in past year on 10,000 personal computers
(Stainforth et al., Nature 2005)
Conclusions• Stochastic optimization of CAM3.1
suggests the model may provide convergent results of global mean predictions.– Assumes parameters tested are key sources
of uncertainty.– Hadley Center model supports inference.– Unanticipated gains in model skill.
• Important differences at regional scales remain.
Each parameter affects many aspects of the model
There are multiple ways to combine parameter values to yield better model skill.