Uncertainties in the atmospheric oxidation of biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) : implications for air quality and climate Jingqiu Mao (Princeton/GFDL) Yale University, 02/20/2014
Dec 16, 2015
Uncertainties in the atmospheric oxidation of biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) :
implications for air quality and climate
Jingqiu Mao (Princeton/GFDL)
Yale University, 02/20/2014
Acknowledgement
Measurements: William Brune (Penn State), Xinrong Ren (NOAA/UMD)
Modeling: Fabien Paulot (Harvard), Daniel Jacob(Harvard), Ron Cohen (UC Berkeley), Paul Wennberg(Caltech), Larry Horowitz(GFDL)
BEARPEX science team (Biosphere Effects on Aerosols and Photochemistry Experiment)ICARTT science team (International Consortium on Atmospheric Transport and Transformation)SENEX science team (Southeast Nexus)
O3
O2
O3
OH HO2
hn, H2O
Deposition
NO
H2O2
CH4, CO, VOCs
NO2
STRATOSPHERE
TROPOSPHERE
8-18 km
Tropospheric radical chemistry
Air Quality
Climate
hn
hn
NOx = NO + NO2
HOx = OH + HO2
Global Emissions (Tg/yr)
0
200
400
600
Isoprene Methanol Other BiogVOCs
All AnthroVOCs
VOCs affect air quality and climate
Isoprene
Most important non-methane VOCGlobal emissions ~ methane(but > 104 times more reactive) ~ 6x anthropogenic VOC emissions
How we understand isoprene oxidation…ten years ago!
OH
Organic peroxy radicals
NOx
~10%
~90%
Alkyl nitrates
HCHO + MVK + MACR + other compounds
HO2
Organic peroxides
deposited Terminal sink for radicals
Terminal sink for radicals
IsopreneRO2
ROOH
RONO2
• OH is the main driver for isoprene oxidation!• OH concentration can be modulated by isoprene.
NO2
O3
NO
h
Model underestimates measured OH by a factor of 2-10 in forested regions.
(Lelieveld et al., Nature, 2008)
Pristine forests over South America
(Hofzumahaus, Science, 2009) (Ren et al., 2008, JGR)
Southern China (isoprene-rich)
Eastern US(isoprene-rich)
OH
Organic peroxy radicals
NOx
~10%
~90%
Alkyl nitrates
HCHO + MVK + MACR + other compounds
HO2
Organic peroxides
deposited Terminal sink for radicals
Terminal sink for radicals
IsopreneRO2
ROOH
RONO2
New understanding on the fate of organic peroxides
OH
O OH
+ OH
(Paulot et al., 2009, Science)
Epoxide
• Epoxide is an important precursor for secondary organic aerosols.
• Regeneration of OH from epoxide was not enough to close the gap.
OH
Organic peroxy radicals
NOx
~10%
~90%
Alkyl nitrates
HCHO + MVK + MACR + other compounds
HO2
Organic peroxides
Terminal sink for radicals
Isoprene
RO2
ROOH
RONO2
OH
O OH
+ OH
(Peeters et al., 2009, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.)
The third pathway proposed by Peeters et al. – unimolecular isomerization!
HOOO
isomerization
OHphotolysis
HPALDTo match observed OH, isomerization needs to be much faster than other channels!
Epoxide
This was a theoretical prediction!
If the isomerization is fast, the impact on global OH is huge!
(Taraborrelli et al., 2012, Nature Geoscience)
• this increases global OH by 14%, from 1.08 to 1.22 x 106 molecules cm-3.• methane lifetime is reduced from 8.0 to 7.2 years.
o Current observation-based estimate is 9.1 ± 0.9 years (Prather et al., 2012, GRL)
OH + isoprene → n OH
Laboratory measurements show much slower rate of isomerization…
Percentage of peroxy radicals going through isomerization
OH discrepancy still exists!
(Wolfe et al., 2012, PCCP)
(Crounse et al., 2011, PCCP)
laser
electronics
Vacuum pumps
optical fibers
OH cellHO2 cell
scaffolding tower
laboratory
inlet
(b)
A new study – BEARPEX 2007/2009
Located at the University of California Berkeley Blodgett Forest Research Station
Bitter Experimentalists Always Repairing Pieces of Equipment eXperiment
Biosphere Effects on Aerosols and Photochemistry Experiment
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 400
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
wavelength
OH
sig
na
l
OH difference by wavelength
off-line
on-line
off-line
off-line off-line
on-line
OH measured by the traditional Laser induced fluorescence (LIF) method …
Laser
Air
Vacuum Pump
OH cell308 nm
change wavelength between on-line (OH fluorescence) to off-line (background) every 20 sec (called OHwave).
and also by a second method …
• remove OH with an OH reactant (called chemical modulation or OHchem) every two minutes
Laser
Air
Vacuum Pump
OH cell308 nm
OH scrubber
(Mao et al., 2012, ACP)
The results were really shocking…!
• The high OH measured in forests are likely biased due to some instrumental interference.
• This interference is confirmed by other instruments.
Traditional measured OH
OH measured by the new method, “true” OH
(Mao et al., 2012, ACP)
The interference signal increases with temperature, pointing to the evidence of BVOCs!
Temperature (K)
OH does not deplete at high temperature (high BVOCs), suggesting some level of OH recycling in the atmosphere.
Traditional measured OH
OH measured by the new method, “true” OH
(Mauldin et al. Nature, 2013)
One possible candidate for causing this interference is Criegee Intermediate
Criegee Intermediate is found to be ubiquitous in forests.
Summary on OH uncertainties
• OH discrepancy between measurements and modeling may be largely due to the instrumental inferences, likely from oxidation products from BVOCs.
• OH recycling from isoprene oxidation does exist, but not as strong as theoretical study suggested.
OH
Organic peroxy radicals
NOx
~10%
~90%
Alkyl nitrates
HCHO + MVK + MACR + other compounds
HO2
Organic peroxides
Terminal sink for radicals
Isoprene
RO2
ROOH
RONO2
OH
O OH
+ OH
HOOO
isomerization
OHphotolysis
HPALD
Epoxide
Uncertainties on ozone production
OH
NOx
~10%
~90%
Alkyl nitrates
HCHO + MVK + MACR + other compounds
Terminal sink for NOx and HOxIsoprene
RO2RONO2
NO2
O3
NO
hCompetition between ozone production and suppression
Major uncertainties lie in two aspects:
• How much RONO2 is produced, experimental results vary from 4% to 12%.
• What is fate of RONO2? Will they release NOx after degradation?
If these nitrates act as HNO3, they will be a sink for both NOx and HOx (0% recycling).
If they react with OH/O3 and release NOx, they will recycle NOx (100% recycling).
The conclusion can differ by more than 10 ppb depending on different assumptions on the recycling efficiency.
(Ito et al., 2009, JGR)
Response of summer surface ozone to an increase in BVOC emissions caused by a 5K temperature increase…
First generation of isoprene nitrates degraded to second generation nitrates!
OH
ONO2
ISOPN (1,4)
OH
ONO2
ISOPN (1,2)
OH
ONO2
ISOPN (4,3)
ONO2
OH
ISOPN (4,1)
O
OH
ONO2
methylvinylketone nitrate (MVKN)
O
ethanal nitrate(ETHLN)
O
propanone nitrate(PROPNN)
O
methacrolein nitrate(MACRN)
ONO2
OH
OH/O2
OH
ONO2
OH
OO
NO
OH
ONO2
OH
O
OH
ONO2
OH
OO
NO
OH
ONO2
OH
O
ONO2
OH
OH
OO
NO
ONO2
OH
OH
O
OH
ONO2
OH
OO
NO
OH
ONO2
OH
O
OH/O2OH/O2OH/O2
O2NO
O2NO
Second generation isoprene nitrates (C3-C4)
First generation isoprene nitrates (C5)
Laboratory measurements show that recycling efficiency is around 55%!
(Paulot et al., 2009, ACP)
The International Consortium on Atmospheric Transport and Transformation (ICARTT) aircraft study: July-August 2004
Extensive measurements on isoprene oxidation products, including total alkyl nitrates (∑ANs)
Chemical transport model (GEOS-Chem)
What is so unique for Eastern US?
(Millet et al., 2008, JGR)(Martin et al., 2008, AE)
Surface NOx is mainly produced from anthropogenic activities
HCHO is mainly produced from biogenic emissions (isoprene in particular)
Anthropogenic + Natural
A new isoprene chemistry for global models
(Mao et al., JGR, 2013)
ISOPO2 + NO is based on Paulot et al. (2009, ACP).ISOPO2 + HO2 is based on Paulot et al. (2009, Science).Isomerization of ISOPO2 is based onPeeters et al. (2009, PCCP) and Crounse et al. (2011, PCCP) .
NO
12
34
OH
11.7%
O
MVK
First generation isoprene nitrates
O
MACRH
O
H
HCHO
88%Organic peroxides
OH
OO
OO
OH
-hydroxyl peroxy radicaland isomers
-hydroxyl peroxy radicaland isomers
71% 29%
HO2 1,6-H shif t isomerization
4.7%
7.3%
12%26% 40% 66%
HOOO
HPALDs
hvOH100%
100%
C2 and C3 carbonyl compounds
ISOPO2 ISOPO2
This chemistry was implemented in GEOS-Chem
Ozone in the boundary layer during ICARTT 2004
Observations Model
Obs vs. Model
Improved O3-CO correlations due to:1. Recycling of NOx
from isoprene nitrates
2. HO2 uptake (lower OH and increase NOx lifetime).
(Mao et al., 2013, JGR)
Mean vertical profiles during ICARTT
O3 has no bias in boundary layer and free troposphere.HCHO provides good constraint on isoprene emissions.
ObservationsModel (GEOS-Chem)
(Mao et al., 2013, JGR)
Total alkyl nitrates (∑ANs) during ICARTT
Model well reproduced ∑ANs.
∑ ANs is dominated by secondary organic nitrates(C3-C4).
∑ANs vs. HCHO ∑ANs vs. O3
Model well reproduced ∑ANs vs. HCHO and ∑ANs vs. O3 correlations.
These correlations cannot be reproduced by a fast isomerization channel of RO2.
Vertical profiles Speciation of ∑ANs
(Mao et al., 2013, JGR)
NOy budget in eastern U.S. boundary layer for July 2004
Species Emission Chemical(P-L)
Dry Deposition
Wet Deposition
Net Export
NOx 386 -337 44 ------ 5
PANs 24 13 ------ 11
∑ANs
ANs 18 7.4 3.6 7
R4N2 10 0.5 ------- 10
HNO3 277 180 110 -3
Export of ∑ANs > Export of PANs
(Mao et al., 2013, JGR)
New chemistry
Previous studies without NOx recycling
Current anthro NOx emissions (2004)
Reduce current anthro NOx emissions by 50%
Isoprene↑NOx ↓OH ↓O3 ↓ due to O3+ISOP
Surface ozone response to isoprene emissions
NOx emissions↓
Sensitivity of ozone to isoprene emissions ↓
(Mao et al., 2013, JGR)
Summary on ozone uncertainties
• Current best estimate of isoprene nitrate yield is 12%, with ~50% recycling efficiency of NOx.
• This results in a positive dependence of ozone on isoprene emissions throughout the U.S.
• Good agreement between observed and modeled total alkyl nitrates provides additional evidence on the isomerization rates.
NO3
ONO2
OO
NO3
ONO2
O
ONO2
O
OH
O2NO
O
R4N2
Nighttime chemistry
Nighttime yield of organic nitrates is 70%>> daytime yield (11.7%)
(Horowitz et al., 2007, JGR) (Mao et al., 2013, JGR)
R4N2 is mainly produced at nightNO3 oxidation dominates organic nitrate production
All current models show that a large portion of daytime alkyl nitrates are from nighttime oxidation.
Sunrise
Entrainment zone
Boundary layer structure by Stull (1988).
How does nighttime chemistry affect global nitrogen/ozone budget?
Sunset
Field studies over Southeast US in the summer of 2013SENEX (NOAA)
SOAS (NSF & EPA)NOMADSS (NCAR)
Two aircrafts based at Smyrna, TN and a tower located at Centerville, Alabama.
Measurements include VOC, NOx, ozone, aerosols, CCN etc.
GFDL provided C180 nudge simulations to SENEX data archive.
A modeling workshop to be held in GFDL this summer.
GFDL AM3 configuration for SENEX• Fully coupled chemistry-climate model
o Parameterizes aerosol activation into liquid cloud dropletso solves both tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry over the full domain
• Nudging wind with GFS meteorological field• High resolution (50 x 50 km) and coarse resolution (200 x 200 km)• MEGAN biogenic emissions (process-based emission)• Anthropogenic emissions use RCP 8.5 scenario (0.5 x 0.5 degree)• New isoprene chemistry (Mao et al., 2013 JGR)
C48 (200 x 200km) C180 (50 x 50km)
Monthly mean ozone for July of 2012
NOx emissions has been reduced by 34% from 2005 to 2011
OMI NO2 column in 2005 (summer)
OMI NO2 column in 2011 (summer)
difference
(Russell et al. 2012, ACP)
OH
Organic peroxy radicals
NOx
~10%
~90%
Alkyl nitrates
HCHO + MVK + MACR + other compounds
HO2
Organic peroxides
Terminal sink for radicals
Isoprene
RO2
ROOH
RONO2
OH
O OH
+ OH
HOOO
isomerization
OHphotolysis
HPALD
Epoxide
Based on our current understanding…
Can we see a shift from high NOx pathway to low NOx pathways?Would that mean we will have more SOA with the reduction of NOx?
Next step: Organic aerosols over Southeast US
fuel/industry open fires
OH, O3,NO3SOG SOA
POA
K
vegetation fuel/industry open fires
700
isopreneterpenesoxygenates…
30 alkenesaromaticsoxygenates…
VOC EMISSION PRIMARY EMISSION
VOC
50 20 100
20
Global sources in Tg C y-1
Two-product
SOA ≡ secondary organic aerosolPOA ≡ primary organic aerosol
Aqueous reactions
?
?
Uptake on aerosols
Temperature trend over past century1950-2006 for May-June (Unit: K/Decade)
(Leibensperger et al., 2012, ACP)
This temperature trend cannot be explained by the change in precipitation or dynamic patterns (El Niňo, NAO) (Portmann et al., 2009, PNAS).
1930-1990 change in Annual Mean Surface Temperature
Current hypothesis: this warming hole is, at least partially, due to the secondary organic aerosols over the eastern US (Goldstein et al., 2009, PNAS).