Ultra-High-Definition Quality of Experience with MPEG-DASH Priv.-Doz. Dr. Christian Timmerer Daniel Weinberger, Christopher Mueller and Stefan Lederer Chief Innovation Officer (CIO) at bitmovin GmbH http://www.bitmovin.com [email protected]Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt (AAU) Faculty of Technical Sciences (TEWI) Department of Information Technology (ITEC) Multimedia Communication (MMC) Sensory Experience Lab (SELab) http://blog.timmerer.com http://selab.itec.aau.at/ http://dash.itec.aau.at [email protected]http://www.slideshare.net/ christian.timmerer
18
Embed
Ultra-High-Definition Quality of Experience with MPEG-DASH
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Ultra-High-Definition Quality of Experience with MPEG-DASH
Priv.-Doz. Dr. Christian TimmererDaniel Weinberger, Christopher Mueller and Stefan Lederer
Chief Innovation Officer (CIO) at bitmovin GmbHhttp://www.bitmovin.com [email protected]
Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt (AAU) Faculty of Technical Sciences (TEWI) Department of Information Technology (ITEC) Multimedia Communication (MMC) Sensory Experience Lab (SELab)
Quality (of Experience)• QoE as evolution of QoS [ITU-T
P.10/G.100]• QoS: totality of characteristics of a
telecommunications service that bear on its ability to satisfy stated and implied needs of the user of the service
• QoE: the overall acceptability of an application or service, as perceived subjectively by the end-user
April 16, 2015 NAB2015 - BEC - QoE-DASH 8
Many definitions but in general, it’s like an elephant
Quality of Experience• COST Action IC1003 – QUALINET (http://www.qualinet.eu/)
“the degree of delight or annoyance of the user of an application or service. It results from the fulfillment of his or her expectations with respect to the utility and/or enjoyment of
the application or service in the light of the user’s personality and current state”
• QoE influence factors– Any characteristic of a user, system, service, application, or context– Grouped into human, system, and context
• QoE features– Perceivable, recognized and namable characteristic of the individual’s experience– Depends on the level of direct perception, interaction, the usage situation
Conclusions• QoE for DASH-based services (a rule of thumb)
– Startup delay (low [but live vs. on-demand & short vs. long-tail content])– Buffer underrun / stalls (zero)– Quality switches (low) and media throughput (high)– Energy- and cost-awareness (data plan)
• No general applicable QoE model for DASH– (Too) many factors influencing / features of QoE for DASH-based services– Methodology for reproducible research is in place and well established– Ample research opportunities