UJTL Ontology Effort TMCM Nelson And Marti Hall. Overview Vision for the UJTL and METLs Scenario Mapping Findings Proposed POA&M outline.

UJTL Ontology Effort

TMCM Nelson

And

Marti Hall

Overview

• Vision for the UJTL and METLs

• Scenario

• Mapping

• Findings

• Proposed POA&M outline

Universal Joint Task List

• Provides a common language - required by law• NCA, CINC, JTF, to the Warfighter• Who and How the task will be performed are

determined by Conditions/Measures, Doctrine, and CONOPS

• Uses – Readiness, Training, Acquisition, C4ISR (IER)

• Future – Doctrine and TTP without boundaries, mission planning, PMA, and resource analysis

ACCOMPLISHOBJECTIVES OF

NATIONAL MILITARYSTRATEGY

CONDUCTSTRATEGIC

DEPLOYMENT &REDEPLOYMENT

DEVELOPSTRATEGIC

INTELLIGENCE,

SURVEILLANCE, ANDRECONNAISSANCE

SN.2 SN.3 SN.5SN.4 SN.6

EMPLOYFORCES

PROVIDESUSTAINMENT

PROVIDESTRATEGIC

DIRECTION ANDINTEGRATION

SN.7

CONDUCTMOBILIZATION

CONDUCTFORCE

DEVELOPMENT

ACCOMPLISHOBJECTIVES OFTHEATER AND

CAMPAIGN STRATEGY

DEPLOY,CONCENTRATE AND

MANEUVERTHEATER FORCES

ST.1

DEVELOP THEATERSTRATEGIC

INTELLIGENCE,

SURVEILLANCE AND

RECONNAISSANCE

ST.2

EMPLOYTHEATER

STRATEGICFIREPOWER

ST.3

SUSTAINTHEATERFORCES

ST.4

PROVIDETHEATER

STRATEGICCOMMAND &

CONTROLST.5

PROVIDETHEATER

PROTECTION

ST.6

ESTABLISHTHEATER FORCEREQUIREMENTS

& READINESS

ST.7

DEVELOP &MAINTAIN

ALLIANCE &REGIONALRELATIONS

ST.8

ACCOMPLISHOBJECTIVES OFSUBORDINATE

CAMPAIGNS & MAJOROPERATIONS

CONDUCTOPERATIONAL

MOVEMENTAND MANEUVER

OP.1

PROVIDEOPERATIONAL

INTELLIGENCE,

SURVEILLANCE, ANDRECONNAISSANCE

OP.2

EMPLOYOPERATIONAL

FIREPOWER

OP.3

PROVIDEOPERATIONAL

SUPPORT

OP.4

EXERCISEOPERATIONALCOMMAND &

CONTROL

OP.5

PROVIDEOPERATIONALPROTECTION

OP.6

ACCOMPLISHOBJECTIVES OFBATTLES AND

ENGAGEMENTS

DEPLOY/ CONDUCT

MANEUVER

TA.1

EMPLOYFIREPOWER

TA.2

EXERCISECOMMAND

AND CONTROL

TA.3

DEVELOPINTELLIGENCE

TA.4

PROTECT THE FORCE

TA.5

PERFORMLOGISTICS

AND COMBATSERVICESUPPORT

TA.6

STRATEGICNATIONAL

STRATEGICTHEATER

OPERATIONAL

TACTICAL

FOSTER MULTI-NATIONAL ANDINTRAGENCYRELATIONS

SN. 8

Naval Tactical Task List

Army Tactical Task List

Air Force TacticalTask List

SN.1

Task and Scenario

• Use Land Mine Warfare as test case for UJTL DAML solution to doctrine and TTP

• Scenario – NCA objective is to retake oil fields from

invading force– CINC objective is to marshal forces, prepare,

and strike• Select Forces• Obstacles to Maneuver

Scenario

• JTF Commander and Component Commanders determine COA’s– Choke points are defined– Intelligence has mines in the SLOC and in

valley leading to objective– Mission is to land forces on hostile shore,

maneuver and take objective– Use of Mine Countermeasure Forces and tactics

is needed

Scenario

• Tactical level– What tasks must be preformed to accomplish

higher level tasks– Tri-service effort (described in mission flow)– Used Army and Navy/MC EOD as the tactical

example

• Various assets involved

ta 1 .2

o p 2 .2 .3

s t 2 .2 .3

sn 1 .1 .5

ta 2 .2 ta 2 .4

o p 2 .2

s t 2 .1 .3

ta 5 .1

o p 5 .2 .1

s t 5 .2 .1

sn 1 .1 .6

ta 1 .1 ta 1 .1 .3 ta 1 .1 .4

o p 1 .2

s t 1 .3 .1

ta 1 .3

o p 1 .3 .1

ta 1 .3 ta 1 .5

o p 1 .5 .1

ta 6 .5

o p 6 .2 .5

s t 1 .6 .1

ta 1 .3

o p 1 .3 .1

s t 1 .4

ta 1 .3

o p 1 .3 .1

ta 1 .3 ta 1 .5 .1

o p 1 .5 .2

ta 6 .5

o p 6 .2 .5

s t 1 .6 .3

ta 4 .2

o p 4 .5 o p 4 .5 .2 o p 4 .6 .2

s t 4 .2

sn 1 .2 .5

ta 2 .2 ta 2 .4

o p 2 .2

s t 2 .1 .3

ta 1 .2

o p 2 .2 .3

s t 2 .2 .3

ta 5 .1

o p 5 .2 .1

s t 5 .2 .1

sn 2 .2

ta 2 .4

o p 2 .3 .1

s t 2 .3 .1

o p 6 .5 .4

s t 6 .2 .6 .3

sn 2 .2 .1

s t 2 .4

sn 2 .4n o o ps

o p 2 .5 .3

s t 2 .4 .2 .4

o p 6 .2

ta 6 .X

o p 6 .2 .2

ta 6 .X

o p 6 .2 .13

s t 6 .2 .2

sn 2 .4 .2 .4

S h ip to S h o re O b je c tiv e in a M in e E n viro n m e nt

The Mapping Effort

ta 4 .2

o p 4 .5

o p 4 .5 .2

o p 4 .6 .2

s t 4 .2

s t 5 .3 .1 .1

sn 3 .1 .2

ta 3 .1

o p 3 .1 .1

s t 3 .1

ta 3 .1

o p 3 .1 .1

o p 1 .4

s t 3 .1 .1

ta 3 .2

o p 3 .2

s t 3 .2 .3

ta 5 .1 ta 5 .2

o p 5 .1 .1

s t 5 .1 .1

ta 6 .5

o p 5 .1 .11

s t 6 .2 .5

sn 3 .2

ta 1 .2

o p 2 .2 .3

s t 3 .2

ta 5 .1

o p 5 .2 .1

s t 5 .2 .1

s t 5 .3 .1 .1

ta 6 .X

o p 6 .2

o p 6 .2 .2

ta 6 .X

o p 6 .2 .13

s t 6 .2 .2

sn 3 .2 .1

ta 3 .1

o p 3 .1 .1

s t 3 .1 .1

ta 3 .2

o p 3 .2

s t 3 .2 .3

sn 3 .2 .5

s t 4 .2n o O P s

s t 4 .4 .1n o O P s

sn 4 .2 .9

ta 4 .2

o p 4 .5

o p 4 .5 .2

o p 4 .6 .2

s t 4 .2

s t 7 .1 .1

sn 4 .6 .3

S h ip to S h o re O b je c tive in a M in e E n viro n m e nt

ta 3 .1

o p 3 .1 .1

s t 3 .1 .1

ta 3 .2

o p 3 .2

s t 3 .2 .3

ta 5 .1 ta 5 .2

o p 5 .1 .1

ta 6 .5

o p 5 .1 .11

s t 5 .1 .1

s t 7 .1 .1

sn 5 .1 .1

ta 3 .1

o p 3 .1 .1

s t 3 .1 .1

ta 3 .2

o p 3 .2

s t 3 .2 .3

ta 5 .1

o p 5 .2 .1

s t 5 .2 .1

o p 5 .3

ta 5 .4 ta 5 .5

o p 5 .4

s t 5 .4 .1

o p 6 .5 .4

s t 6 .2 .6 .3

s t 7 .1 .1

sn 5 .2 .3

ta 3 .1

o p 3 .1 .1

s t 3 .1 .1

ta 3 .2

o p 3 .2

s t 3 .2 .3

s t 7 .1 .1

o p 3 .1 .6 .1

s t 7 .2 .3

sn 7 .1 .2

s t 3 .1 .1

s t 3 .2 .3

s t 7 .1 .1

s t 7 .2 .3

sn 7 .3 .3n o o ps

S h ip to S h o re O b je c tive in a M in e E n viro n m e nt

ta 3 .1

o p 3 .1 .1

s t 3 .1 .1

ta 3 .2

o p 3 .2

s t 3 .2 .3

ta 4 .2

o p 4 .5

o p 4 .5 .2

o p 4 .6 .2

s t 4 .2

ta 5 .1

o p 5 .2 .1

s t 5 .2 .1

o p 6 .2

ta 6 .X

o p 6 .2 .2

ta 6 .X

o p 6 .2 .13

s t 6 .2 .2

o p 6 .5 .4

s t 6 .2 .6 .3 s t 8 .2 .13

sn 8 .1 .11

S h ip to S h o re O b je c tive in a M in e E n viro n m e nt

n ta 1 .1

n ta 1 .1 .1

n ta 1 .1 .1 .1

n ta 1 .1 .1 .2

a rt 1 .1 .1

a rt 1 .1 .2

ta 1 .1

n ta 1 .1 .2 .4

ta 1 .1 .3

n ta 1 .1 .2 .3

ta 1 .1 .4

n ta 1 .2

n ta 1 .2 .1 .1

n ta 1 .2 .3

n ta 1 .2 .4

n ta 1 .2 .5

n ta 1 .2 .6

n ta 1 .2 .7

a rt 1 .2 .1

a rt 1 .2 .3 .4

ta 1 .2

n ta 1 .3

n ta 1 .3 .1

n ta 1 .3 .1 .1

n ta 1 .3 .1 .3

n ta 1 .3 .2

n ta 1 .3 .2 .1

n ta 1 .3 .2 .2

n ta 1 .3 .2 .3

a rt 1 .3 .1

a rt 1 .3 .1 .1

a rt 1 .3 .1 .2

ta 1 .3

n ta 1 .5 .5

ta 1 .5

n ta 1 .5 .1 .1

ta 1 .5 .1

S h ip to S h o re O b je c tive in a M in e E n viro n m e ntA rm y a n d N a vy/M C

n ta 2 .2

n ta 2 .2 .1

n ta 2 .2 .2

n ta 2 .2 .3

n ta 2 .2 .3 .1

n ta 2 .2 .3 .6

n ta 2 .2 .4

a rt 2 .2

a rt 2 .2 .1

a rt 2 .2 .3

a rt 2 .2 .4

ta 2 .2

n ta 2 .4 .4 .1

n ta 2 .4 .4 .4

a rt 2 .3 .2

ta 2 .4

n ta 3 .1 .2

a rt 3 .1

ta 3 .1

n ta 3 .2

n ta 3 .2 .1 .2

a rt 3 .2

ta 3 .2

n ta 4 .5

a rt 4 .2 .1

ta 4 .2

S h ip to S h o re O b je c tive in a M in e E n viro n m e ntA rm y a n d N a vy/M C

n ta 5 .1 .1

n ta 5 .1 .2

n ta 5 .1 .3

a rt 5 .2

ta 5 .1

n ta 5 .1 .1

a rt 5 .2

a rt 5 .5

a rt 5 .6

ta 5 .2

n ta 5 .2 .1

n ta 5 .3

a rt 5 .3 .1

a rt 5 .4

a rt 5 .4 .4

ta 5 .4

n ta 5 .4 .2

a rt 5 .6

a rt 5 .7

ta 5 .5

n ta 6 .1 .1 .2

a rt 6 .2

a rt 6 .2 .1 .3

a rt 6 .2 .1 .3 .2

a rt 6 .2 .2 .1 .4

a rt 6 .2 .4

ta 6 .X

n ta 6 .1 .1 .3

a rt 6 .2 .1 .4

ta 6 .5

S h ip to S h o re O b je c tive in a M in e E n viro n m e ntA rm y a n d N a vy/M C

Standardization – Create once use many times

EOD DSS DemonstrationAs we move more towards multi-mission platforms, awareness of how these missions interact and commonality is critical to the decision process.

In this case, the IED mission is selected.

Some EOD platforms will have up to eight missions.

We look for commonality among those missions.

StructureStructure allows us to find commonality.

The missions are divided into phases that are common throughout the majority of EOD missions.

Mission Planning for example is common to everyone.

The next step is to put processes to the structure.

Flow Charting to Mission Essential Tasks

Here we use a simple flow chart to map the Mission Planning process.

Each block has steps or tasks that are preformed as part of the process.

The next step is to identify the language associated with each task.

We will use this example to show how the mapping

relates to structure and commonality.

Each block is a hot link to the

procedural steps

Common Language, Conditions, and Measures

NTA 2.2.4 Assess Tactical Environment. To utilize organic sensors to detect combat threats, environmental conditions, geographic constraints, and background shipping.

The site survey can be associated with Navy Tactical Task (NTA) 2.2.4 and is based upon the Conditions of Physical, Military, and Civil Environment.

And is Measured by time (minutes, hours, or days), percentage, simple yes/no, incident, distance, number, etc.

The use of this language allows us to determine MOE and MOP. It is the key to integrating doctrine and TTP into our everyday operations.

C 2.4.2 Intelligence Data Base The availability of intelligence to

support a mission or task.

NTA 2.2.4 M5 Percent - Of threats found prior to engagement by collection resources

The Layered Approach Mission Execution is a complex environment. Commanders and Warfighters require a tool to assist them in the execution of their assigned tasks.

Each team member requires different content in order to execute their tasks, making up the first layer.

As the task is executed, Commander Critical Information is updated, new tasks assigned, etc.

The graphic is a concept view of how that communication takes place.

Findings

• Task lists represent a hierarchy but not necessarily an ontology (keywords, categories, classes, and properties)

• Task list contains information not valid by definition of purpose (who vice what)

• SME intensive - lacks Automation• Proper tagging essential to allow for

inference and to include “blobby” text

Proposed POA&M

• Top Down and Bottom Up Approach– QDR, Defense Secretary, Services determine military

capabilities and missions• Doctrine developed to support operational capabilities

• TTP developed to missions

• UJTL DAMLized to tasks supporting capabilities and missions

• Development of tools for tasks, methodology, and analysis

• Select modeling force for initial implementation• Continue current effort to identify efficiencies and

findings