Top Banner
1
37

UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

Jan 24, 2017

Download

Documents

Mohammed Adel
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

1

Page 2: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

2

Non-Warfarin AnticoagulantsFrom comparison into

clinical practiceBy:

Mohammed Adel B.Sc., PharmDClinical Pharmacy Department

Al-Ahrar General Hospital

Page 3: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

3

Content•Blood hemostasis•UFH vs LMWH vs Fondaparinux •Practice guidelines recommendations about:•UFH•LMWH•Fondaparinux

Page 4: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

4

Blood hemostasis

Page 5: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

5

UFH vs LMWH vs Fondaparinux •Mechanism of action •Timing of treatment before surgery•Pharmacokinetic Parameters•Dosing frequencies

Page 6: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

6

UFH vs LMWH vs Fondaparinux •Pregnancy •Ability to cause HIT•Use in HIT treatment•Use in Pt with Hx of HIT

Page 7: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

7

UFH vs LMWH vs Fondaparinux •Mechanism of action:

UFH:Binds to and potentiates the actions of antithrombin (AT) to inactivate factor Xa

Prevent the conversion of prothrombin to thrombin

Page 8: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

8

UFH vs LMWH vs Fondaparinux •Mechanism of action:

UFH:Prevent the conversion of fibrinogen to fibrin

Binds nonspecifically to various plasma proteins and endothelial cells resulting in an unpredictable dose-response relationship and low bioavailability after subcutaneous (SC) administration

Page 9: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

9

UFH vs LMWH vs Fondaparinux •Mechanism of action:

LMWH:Same as UFH but with longer and more preferential binding with factor Xa

Less able to inhibit the production of thrombin and bind to plasma proteins and endothelial cells less due to their decreased size

Page 10: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

10

UFH vs LMWH vs Fondaparinux •Mechanism of action:

LMWH:More predictable anticoagulant responseLess inter-patient variabilityLonger duration of action than heparin.

Page 11: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

11

UFH vs LMWH vs Fondaparinux •Mechanism of action:

Fondaparinux:Enhances the anti-Xa activity of AT by 300-fold

AT specificity does not allow binding to other plasma proteins

Page 12: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

12

UFH vs LMWH vs Fondaparinux •Mechanism of action:

Fondaparinux:It has no direct effect on thrombinIt has excellent bioavailability after SC administration and longer half-life

Page 13: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

13

UFH vs LMWH vs Fondaparinux •Timing before surgery:

Agent of treatment

Half life Last dose before procedure

UFH 45 mins 4 HrsLMWH 4-7 Hrs 24 HrsFondaparinux

17-21 Hrs 2-4 days

Page 14: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

14

UFH vs LMWH vs Fondaparinux

Page 15: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

15

Practice guidelines recommendations

Primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases

Management of anticoagulantsPrevention of VTE in non-surgical Pts

Treatment of VTE

ACCF/AHA joint

Guidelines

9th ACCP

Guidelines

Page 16: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

16

ACCF/AHA RECOMMENDATIONS

3.5. Adjunctive Antithrombotic Therapy to Support Reperfusion With Primary PCI

STEMI

Page 17: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

17

ACCF/AHA RECOMMENDATIONS

4.2.2. Adjunctive Antithrombotic Therapy to Support Reperfusion With Fibrinolytic Therapy

STEMI

Page 18: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

18

ACCF/AHA RECOMMENDATIONS

5.4.1. Anticoagulant Therapy to Support PCI After Fibrinolytic Therapy

STEMI

Page 19: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

19

ACCF/AHA RECOMMENDATIONSNSTEMI

Early initiation

Page 20: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

20

ACCF/AHA RECOMMENDATIONSNSTEMI

Page 21: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

21

ACCP RECOMMENDATIONS

The 8th edition of the ACCP guidelines included 600 recommendations in 968 pages

Very lengthyPractice non-friendly

In 2012 the 9th edition provided highly focused and brief recommendations in addition to the detailed edition

Page 22: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

22

ACCP RECOMMENDATIONS

Management of anticoagulants6.1 UFH Dose Adjustment by Weight

For VTE IV UFH, bolus 80 units/kg followed by 18 units/kg per h

For cardiac or stroke patients bolus 70 units/kg followed by 15 units/kg per h

Use of a fixed dose (bolus 5,000 units followed by 1,000 units/h).

Page 23: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

23

ACCP RECOMMENDATIONS

Management of anticoagulants6.2 Dose Management of (SC) UFH:

For outpatients with VTE treated with SC UFH, we suggest weight-adjusted dosing (first dose 333 units/kg, then 250 units/kg) without monitoring rather than fixed or weight adjusted dosing with monitoring (Grade 2C) .

Page 24: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

24

ACCP RECOMMENDATIONS

Management of anticoagulants7.1 Therapeutic Dose of LMWH in Patients With Decreased Renal FunctionFor patients receiving therapeutic LMWH who have severe renal insufficiency (CrCL, 30 mL/min), we suggest a reduction of the dose rather than using standard doses (Grade 2C) .

Page 25: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

25

ACCP RECOMMENDATIONS

Management of anticoagulants8.1 Fondaparinux Dose Management by Weight:

For patients with VTE and body weight over 100 kg, we suggest that the treatment dose of Fondaparinux be increased from the usual 7.5 mg to 10 mg daily SC (Grade 2C).

Page 26: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

26

ACCP RECOMMENDATIONS

Prevention of VTE in non-surgical Pts2.3. Hospitalized Acutely ill Medical Patients

For acutely ill hospitalized medical patients at increased risk of thrombosis, we recommend anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis with:

Low molecular weight heparin LMWHLow-dose unfractionated heparin (LDUH) bid or tid

Fondaparinux

Page 27: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

27

ACCP RECOMMENDATIONS

Prevention of VTE in non-surgical Pts2.4. For acutely ill hospitalized medical patients at low risk of thrombosis:We recommend against The use of:

Pharmacologic prophylaxisMechanical prophylaxis

Page 28: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

28

ACCP RECOMMENDATIONS

Prevention of VTE in non-surgical Pts2.7.1. For acutely ill hospitalized medical patients who are bleeding or at high risk for bleeding:we recommend against anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis (Grade 1B) .

Page 29: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

29

ACCP RECOMMENDATIONS

Prevention of VTE in non-surgical Pts2.7.2. For acutely ill hospitalized medical patients at increased risk of thrombosis who are bleeding or at high risk for major bleeding:we suggest the optimal use of mechanical thromboprophylaxis with graduated compression stockings (GCS)(Grade 2C) intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) (Grade 2C) , rather than no mechanical thromboprophylaxis.

Page 30: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

30

ACCP RECOMMENDATIONS

Prevention of VTE in non-surgical Pts2.7.2. For acutely ill hospitalized medical patients at increased risk of thrombosis who are bleeding or at high risk for major bleeding:When bleeding risk decreases, and if VTE risk persists, we suggest that pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis be substituted for mechanical thromboprophylaxis (Grade 2B).

Page 31: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

31

ACCP RECOMMENDATIONS

Prevention of VTE in non-surgical Pts2.8. In acutely ill hospitalized medical patients who receive an initial course of thromboprophylaxis:We suggest against extending the duration of thromboprophylaxis beyond the period of patient immobilization or acute hospital stay (Grade 2B) .

Page 32: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

32

ACCP RECOMMENDATIONS

Prevention of VTE in non-surgical Pts3.2. In critically ill patients:

We suggest against routine ultrasound screening for DVT (Grade 2C) .

We suggest using LMWH or LDUH thromboprophylaxis over no prophylaxis (Grade 2C).

Page 33: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

33

ACCP RECOMMENDATIONS

Prevention of VTE in non-surgical Pts3.4.4. For critically ill patients who are bleeding, or are at high risk for major bleeding:We suggest mechanical thromboprophylaxis with GCS (Grade 2C) or IPC (Grade 2C) until the bleeding risk decreases, rather than no mechanical thromboprophylaxis.

When bleeding risk decreases, we suggest that pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis be substituted for mechanical thromboprophylaxis (Grade 2C) .

Page 34: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

34

ACCP RECOMMENDATIONS

Prevention of VTE in non-surgical Pts4.2.2. In outpatients with solid tumors who have additional risk factors for VTE and who are at low risk of bleeding:We suggest prophylactic dose LMWH or LDUH over no prophylaxis (Grade 2B) .

Page 35: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

35

ACCP RECOMMENDATIONS

Treatment of VTE 2.1 Initial Anticoagulation for Patients With Acute DVT of the LegIn patients with acute DVT of the leg treated with VKA

therapy, we recommend initial treatment with parenteral anticoagulation (LMWH, Fondaparinux, IV UFH, or SC UFH) over no such initial treatment (Grade 1B).

Page 36: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

36

ACCP RECOMMENDATIONS

Treatment of VTE 2.5 Choice of Initial Anticoagulant Regimen in Patients With Proximal DVTIn patients with acute DVT of the leg, we suggest LMWH or Fondaparinux over IV UFH (Grade 2C) and over SC UFH (Grade 2B for LMWH; Grade 2C for Fondaparinux) .

In patients with acute DVT of the leg treated with LMWH, we suggest once- over twice-daily administration(Grade 2C).

Talking

about

Dalteparin

Page 37: UFH & LMWH & fondaparinux

37

Thank

youBest Regards