Top Banner
UCSF Life Science The Lean LaunchPad Partners Version 6/13/12 Who are your Partners and Suppliers?
20
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: UCSF Life Sciences: Week 6 Diagnostics Partners

UCSF Life Science

The Lean LaunchPad

Partners

Version 6/13/12

Who are your Partners and Suppliers?

Page 2: UCSF Life Sciences: Week 6 Diagnostics Partners

Key Partners

Who are your Partners and Suppliers?

Page 3: UCSF Life Sciences: Week 6 Diagnostics Partners

© 2012 Steve Blank

Page 4: UCSF Life Sciences: Week 6 Diagnostics Partners

Partners – who are they?

4

• Manufacturing / build / component suppliers

• Technology partners

• Channel (S&M) partners

• Strategic partners

• Co-everything (development, branding, etc.)

Keep asking yourself:

Why do I need this partner? How can we keep it valuable to both sides? How is this going to change with time?

Page 5: UCSF Life Sciences: Week 6 Diagnostics Partners

Partners – Key Suppliers

5

• Outsource suppliers

• Backoffice, supply chain, manufacturing

• Direct suppliers

• Components, raw materials, etc.

Example: Apple builds the iPhone from multiple suppliers

Page 6: UCSF Life Sciences: Week 6 Diagnostics Partners

Partnering with (Big) Companies

Page 7: UCSF Life Sciences: Week 6 Diagnostics Partners

Leverage

…is the only way to make it work

Page 8: UCSF Life Sciences: Week 6 Diagnostics Partners

Protectable Leverage1. S&M support2. IP (FTO)3. Complementary products

1. Technology / Products2. New customers3. IP

Page 9: UCSF Life Sciences: Week 6 Diagnostics Partners

9

Molecular Diagnostics

Partner Examples

Page 10: UCSF Life Sciences: Week 6 Diagnostics Partners

Chip Manufacturers

Partners

LiquiLume

Hospitals

OEMs

Packaging

Reagents (IDT, Fisher)

Sample Prep (not for RUO)

Shippers (UPS, FedEx)

Distributors (Fisher)

Doctors

Clinical Labs

Dx Test Company

Research Labs

Back End Front End

Page 11: UCSF Life Sciences: Week 6 Diagnostics Partners

Back-End Partners

Type Examples Benefit Risk / Need

Chip manufacturer

HTE Labs Make optofluidic chips (key element of technology)

High / Critical

Packaging ? Keep device costs low Low / Essential

OEMs Laser or detector manufacturers

Parts needed to build complete instrument

Low, Med / Essential

Reagents Supplier

IDT, Fisher Provide custom probes and control targets.

Med / Essential

Sample Prep. Instrument

Qiagen Partner for validation of input target samples

Low / Nice

Page 12: UCSF Life Sciences: Week 6 Diagnostics Partners

Front-End Partners

Type Examples Benefit Risk / Need

Distributor Fisher Sell chips, reagents Low / Not critical for RUO

Research labs UCSF oncologists, Stanford MDx Lab, UCSF Micro. Lab

Will validate technology; publish; develop assays

Low / Critical during phase I

Dx test company

Genentech;Companion Dx w

pharma and biotechs;Specialty Dx test cos.

Possibly unique test on unique platform, partner

develops assayStrategic alliance

Low / Synergistic

Clinical labs Quest, LabCorp Help develop CLIA-waived application; 510(k); clinical

trials

Med / Crucial during phase II

Page 13: UCSF Life Sciences: Week 6 Diagnostics Partners

13

Medical Device

Partner Examples

Page 14: UCSF Life Sciences: Week 6 Diagnostics Partners
Page 15: UCSF Life Sciences: Week 6 Diagnostics Partners
Page 16: UCSF Life Sciences: Week 6 Diagnostics Partners
Page 17: UCSF Life Sciences: Week 6 Diagnostics Partners

REGULATION

CLINICAL

TRIALS

IP

REIMBURSEMENT

17

Page 18: UCSF Life Sciences: Week 6 Diagnostics Partners

WEEKS LEFT!

CLINICAL

TRIALS

ONLY TWO

REIMBURSEMENT

18

Page 19: UCSF Life Sciences: Week 6 Diagnostics Partners

Next week’s lecture

REGULATION

CLINICAL

TRIALS

IPREIMBURSEMENT

19

Page 20: UCSF Life Sciences: Week 6 Diagnostics Partners

Next week’s slides

As per the syllabus, plus:

1. Your final (validated?) hypotheses: regulation

2. Your final (validated?) hypotheses:reimbursement

3. Preliminary hypotheses: IP needs and clinical trialstructure, size, etc.