UBS Global Oil and Gas UBS Global Oil and Gas Conference May 21, 2013 RbSlil Rob Saltiel President and CEO
UBS Global Oil and GasUBS Global Oil and Gas Conference
May 21, 2013
R b S l i lRob SaltielPresident and CEO
1
Forward Looking Statements
Statements contained in this report with respect to the future are forward-lookingstatements. These statements reflect management’s reasonable judgment with respectto future events. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks,uncertainties and assumptions and actual results could differ materially from thoseuncertainties and assumptions and actual results could differ materially from thoseanticipated as a result of various factors including: uncertainties related to the level ofactivity in offshore oil and gas exploration and development; oil and gas prices;competition and market conditions in the contract drilling industry; the risks inherent inthe construction of a rig; delays in the commencement of operations of a rig followingthe construction of a rig; delays in the commencement of operations of a rig followingdelivery; our ability to enter into and the terms of future contracts; possible cancelation orsuspension of drilling contracts; the availability of qualified personnel; labor relations;operating hazards and risks; terrorism and political and other uncertainties inherent inforeign operations (including risks of war civil disturbances seizure or damage toforeign operations (including risks of war, civil disturbances, seizure or damage toequipment, and exchange and currency fluctuations); the impact of governmental andindustry laws and regulations; and environmental matters. These factors and others aredescribed and discussed in our most recently filed annual report on Form 10-K, in ourForms 10-Q for subsequent periods and in our other filings with the Securities andForms 10-Q for subsequent periods and in our other filings with the Securities andExchange Commission which are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Eachforward looking statement speaks only as of the date of this presentation and weundertake no duty to update the content of this presentation or any forward-lookingstatement contained herein to conform the statement to actual results or to reflect
2
statement contained herein to conform the statement to actual results or to reflectchanges in our expectations.
Overview & Strategy
3
Transforming Atwood Oceanics
Multi-year investment in fleet modernization and expansion Delivering 5 UDW floater and 3 jackup newbuilds from 2011 through
20152015 Will own youngest high-spec floater and jack-up fleets in the industry
Industry-leading safety and reliability performance across fleety g y y p
Top-tier revenue efficiency and cost control leads to: Best in class margins Best-in-class margins Superior shareholder returns
Growth is fully funded and sourced predominantly from operating y p y p gcash flow Current contract backlog of $2.4 billion Maintains substantial financial flexibility
4
y
Steady Revenue and Earnings Growth2008-Present
R
$787$800
$ Millions
$300
$ Millions
Revenue Net Income
$651
$787
$600
$700
$215
$257$272
$250
$253Q2
$527
$400
$500
$86Q2
$215
$150
$200
$245Q1
$200
$300Q2
$73$50
$100
$0
$100
2008 2010 2012 2013
Q1
$0
$50
2008 2010 2012 2013
5 Note: Revenue and Net Income represented on fiscal year basis.
Industry Leading Margins and Capital Returns for FY 2013
ESVATW
35%
40%
DO
SDRL25%
30%
rgin
s
DO
RDC RIGNE15%
20%
Net
Mar
5%
10%
Note: The Bubble size represents the number of rigs operated by each company
0%0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18%
Capital Return
6
Note: DO = Diamond Offshore, ESV = Ensco, NE = Noble, RDC = Rowan, RIG = Transocean, SDRL = Seadrill
• Capital Return = Net Income / (Debt + Shareholders’ Equity)
Source: Bloomberg, FactSet Dated May 15, 2013
Total Shareholder Return: 1 Year Comparison
Shareholder Return: ATW Vs. Peers*150%
Total Shareholder Return: 3 Year Comparison
31.7%
19.9% 20.5% 20.5%
24.2%
31.5%
20%
25%
30%
35%Total Shareholder Return: 1 Year Comparison
70.8% 66.9%
129.7%
70%
90%
110%
130%
150%p
12.7%
5%
10%
15%
20%
14.4% 21.6%34.6%
-10%
10%
30%
50%
70%
0%ATW RDC DO NE SDRL RIG ESV
-11.8%-30%
ATW RIG DO NE RDC ESV SDRL
800%Total Shareholder Return: 10 Year Comparison Total Shareholder Return: 20 Year Comparison
699.8%
487.2%
400%
500%
600%
700%
800% 3721.8%
2000%
2500%
3000%
3500%
4000%
82.4%161.2% 165.2% 167.5%
0%
100%
200%
300%
400%
1002.5%
258.3%
0%
500%
1000%
1500%
2000%
7
*As of May 14, 2013Source: FactSet
ATW RDC ESV NE RIG DO0%
ATW NE RDC
Expanding our High Specification Rig Fleet2011 – 2015 Fleet Additions
5 Ultra-Deepwater Floaters3 High-Spec Jackups
$3 8 Billion InvestmentAtwood Mako
$3.8 Billion Investment
Atwood Manta
Atwood Orca
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Atwood Osprey Atwood AdvantageAtwood Condor Atwood Achiever Atwood Admiral
8
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015CALENDAR YEAR
Improving Revenue Quality – 2011 vs. 2015
FY 2011 Revenue FY 2015 Revenue*
10%10%
27%
20%53%
80%20%
Ultra Deepwater FloatersHigh Spec JackupsOther
Ultra Deepwater FloatersHigh Spec JackupsOther
9*Source: Atwood internal analysis (pro forma estimate for FY 2015)
Fleet Transformation and Growth
Atwood’s fleet has a strong presence in Australia, Southeast Asia and West Africa
Houston, TexasATWOOD ADVANTAGE
ATWOOD ACHIEVER
ATWOOD ADMIRAL
ATWOOD BEACON
ATWOOD FALCON
ATWOOD HUNTER
ATWOOD CONDORATWOOD ADMIRAL
VICKSBURGATWOOD AURORA
ATWOOD MANTA
ATWOOD ORCA
ATWOOD MAKO
Headquarters UDW / DW Semisubmersibles
ATWOOD EAGLE
ATWOOD OSPREY
Newbuild DrillshipsJack ups
10
Jack-ups
Execution Performance
11
Achieving Top-Tier Execution
Revenue Cost ProjectM tKe Enablers
Value Drivers
Efficiency Control ManagementKey Enablers- Centralized
maintenance and technical support
Best-in-class Operating and Net Margins
2011- Atwood Osprey2012- Atwood Mako
Atwood Condor
technical support- Consistent standards
and trouble-shooting- Common equipment
across rigs and - Atwood Condor2013- Atwood Manta- Atwood Orca2014
supplier consolidation- Organic growth with
proven rig designs and world-class shipyards
Consistent, Superior Shareholder Returns
- Atwood Advantage- Atwood Achiever2015- Atwood Admiral
shipyards- Early capital project
scoping and detailed project planning
- Experienced project
12
- Atwood Admiralmanagement teams
Continuous Safety Performance ImprovementFiscal Year 2008-Present
1 05
1.2
Total Recordable Incident Rate
0.35
0.40
Lost Time Incident Rate
1.05
0.800.8
1.0
0.260.25
0.30
0.35
0.68
0 4
0.6
0.180.15
0.20
0.2
0.4
0.060.05
0.10
0.02008 2010 2012
0.002008 2010 2012
13
Atwood Oceanics recognized as leading offshore driller for HSE in 2012* *Results from EnergyPoint Research customer satisfaction survey published February 20, 2013
Major Accomplishments – Last Nine MonthsPartial Listing
Delivered Atwood Mako 4 weeks ahead of schedule and started up in the Gulf of Thailand
Delivered Atwood Condor ahead of original schedule and
Sept 2012
Oct 2012Delivered Atwood Condor ahead of original schedule and started up in the Gulf of Mexico
Announced FY2012 record revenue and earnings and best f t i At d’ 44 hi t
Oct 2012
Nov 2012safety year in Atwood’s 44-year history
Delivered Atwood Manta 3 weeks ahead of schedule and started up in the Gulf of Thailand
Dec 2012
Contracted Atwood Orca to initial 2-year contract in Thailand
A d 1Q FY2013 l i h 9 % J 2013
Jan 2013
Announced 1Q FY2013 results with 95% revenue efficiency
Delivered Atwood Orca 10 weeks ahead of schedule
Jan 2013
April 2013
14
Announced 2Q FY2013 results with record quarterly revenue
May 2013
Calendar 2013 Priorities and Potential Catalysts
Start-up of the Atwood Orca
Contracting ofAtwood Beacon andContracting of Atwood Beacon and Atwood Hunter (2013 / 2014 availability)
Securing inaugural contract for theSecuring inaugural contract for the Atwood Achiever
Potential exercise of option for 4th “APotential exercise of option for 4th A-Class” drillship
Delivery and start-up of theAtwoodDelivery and start-up of the Atwood Advantage
Extensions/contracting of rigs with
15
Extensions/contracting of rigs with 2014+ availability
Market Outlook and Contracts
16
64 Recent Discoveries in Floater Water Depths*December 2011 to April 2013
6
4
6
4“G
10
34
117
“GoldenTriangle”
104
87
17 Source: IHS-Petrodata
* Water depths greater than 500 ft.
Steady Floater Utilization – UDW Rigs “Sold Out”
92%94%96%98%100%
250
270
290
310
tiliz
atio
n
ly
Worldwide Floater Supply and Utilization303
80%82%84%86%88%90%92%
150
170
190
210
230
Con
trac
ted
Ut
Tota
l Sup
p 221
UDW Floater Supply and Utilization
80%50
Total Supply Total Contracted Utilization
90%92%94%96%98%100%
80
100
120
140
d U
tiliz
atio
n
Supp
ly
UDW Floater Supply and Utilization128
80%82%84%86%88%90%
0
20
40
60
Con
trac
ted
Tota
l S 51
18
Total Supply Total Contracted Utilization
Source: IHS-PetrodataNote: Contracted Utilization equals Working Rigs / Total Supply
New Build UDW Floater Delivery by Calendar Years
No. of Rigs
130
35
3 18
1
20
25
30
17
8 9
293 18
7
5
10
15
8 9
0
5
2013 2014 2015 2016+Contracted Uncontracted
Total 92Contracted 63
19 Source: IHS Petrodata as of May 1, 2013
Contracted 63
Uncontracted 29
Jackups: Utilization Recovers Even as Supply Grows
100%490494
Worldwide Jackup Supply and Utilization
90%
95%
470
480
80%
85%
450
460
Util
izat
ion
Tota
l Sup
ply
443
65%
70%
75%
420
430
440
65%420
Total Supply Total Contracted Utilization High Spec Contracted Utilization
20
Source: IHS-PetrodataNote: Contracted Utilization equals Working Rigs / Total Supply
Accelerating High Spec Jack-Up Dayrate Outlook
J k t d i t l 20% th t 4 thJackup tenders up approximately 20% over the past 4 months
Driven by demand in the North Sea, Middle East, SE Asia and IndiaContract duration and lead times steadily increasingy g
Currently at 390 and 160 days, respectively
Up 100% and 50%, respectively since 2007Market outlook for 2013 remains favorable
Overall contracted utilization rates for high spec rigs exceeds 94%
Dayrates currently in the $160 000 to $190 000 range depending on the Dayrates currently in the $160,000 to $190,000 range, depending on the geographic region and contract term
Many older rigs are not likely to return to market
30 jack-up rigs permanently removed from the fleet since 2011; compared to aggregate of 22 rigs for the previous 15 years ending 2010
21
Jack-up demand continues to shift toward newer, high-specification rigs
Source – IHS, ISI Group, Pareto Securities
Atwood Fleet Contract Status (by calendar year)
Ri Cl /Ri C t2013 2014 2015
Rig Class/Rig CustomerQ1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
Ultra-Deepwater Drillships
Atwood Advantage Noble Energy $409K $584K
Atwood Achiever Available Delivery mid-2014
Atwood Admiral Available Delivery early 2015
Ultra-Deepwater SemisubsAtwood Osprey Chevron $490K $470K
Atwood Condor Hess / Shell $514K
Deepwater Semisubs
Atwood Eagle Woodside / BHP / Apache $436K / $385K
Atwood Falcon Apache $385K
Atwood Hunter Noble Energy $435Kgy $
Jack-Ups
Atwood Aurora Bowleven / Glencore / Addax $134K $155K $164
Atwood Beacon Shemen Oil $151K
Vicksburg CEC International $105 $115K
Atwood Mako Salamander $145K $155K
Atwood Manta CEC International $145K
Atwood Orca Mubadala Petroleum $160K
22
Contracted (current)Contracted (follow on work)ShipyardMobilization (as of 5/14/13)
Firm Rig Years17.6
Firm Revenue $ Billions
2.4
Revenue Backlog Analysis
$1,200 (in Millions)
(FY in $Millions) Total = $2.4 Billion
$965$800
$1,000 $353
$886$965
$600
$886
$411 $461
$531
$200
$400 $1,129
$-2013 2014 2015 2016+
MajorsLarge IndependentsS ll I d d t
23
Small Independents
(as of 5/14/13)
Fiscal Year
Financial Considerations
24
Future Capital Expenditures Fully Financed
$ 1($ millions)
900
1,000
• $1.5 billion1 in remaining total capital expenditures as of May 1, 2013
• Approximately $0.9 billion in
400
600
700
800Approximately $0.9 billion in contracted after tax cash flow through 2015 is available to fund these expenditures
With th i f th $550920
520
2203
300
400
500• With the exercise of the $550
million Credit Facility accordion, we are fully funded for all construction costs
124
480
124
520
260
0
100
200• Credit metrics peak in mid-2014 with the delivery of the Atwood Achiever
• Debt to cap and debt to 0
CAPEX Contracted CashflowUncontracted Cash Flow Debt
20132 2014 2015• Debt-to-cap and debt to EBITDA ratios are maintained below 40% and 2.7 times, respectively
Fiscal Year
25
1. Includes $245 million of maintenance and other CAPEX and capital spares for 2013, 2014 and 20152. CAPEX for 2013 represents projections for remaining 5 months for fiscal 20133. Represents approximately ½ of uncontracted cash flow to meet CAPEX requirements
Uncontracted Cash Flow Debt
P t ti l I t l $6 25 E i P Sh f N b ild Ri D li i *
Earnings Growth Through Newbuild Rig Deliveries
Potential Incremental $6.25 Earnings Per Share from Newbuild Rig Deliveries*
Atwood CondorAtwood MakoAt d M t
Atwood MantaAtwood OrcaAt d Ad t
Atwood AchieverAtwood Admiral
Atwood Admiral
$2.50
Atwood MantaAtwood Orca
Atwood AdvantageAtwood Achiever
$1.00$1.50$2.00
$0.00$0.50
FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
High-Spec Jack Ups Ultra-Deepwater FloatersAssumptions:UDW Floaters – Dayrate of $575,000, operating cost of $190,000 (inflation-adjusted), revenue efficiency of 95% and a tax rate of 13%
26* Comparison versus FY2012 earnings; EPS analysis excludes any increases in Operating or SG&A
costs or interest expense during the 4 year period
High Specifications Jack-ups – Dayrate of $155,000,operating costs of $71,000 (inflation-adjusted), revenue efficiency of 95% and a tax rate of 13%
Summary
27
The Atwood Advantage
High-Quality Operating Fleet with Aggressive Growth InitiativeGrowth Initiative
Knowledgeable and Experienced
Management Team
Attractive Geographic
Diversity
Strong Backlog with High Quality
Customers
Significant Liquidity and
Financial Flexibility
History and Reputation of Safe
and Efficient Operations
Industry-Leading Margins and Shareholder
Returns
28
OperationsReturns
Thank You
29
www.atwd.comwww.atwd.com