Types of Speech Pure Speech –Calm –Passionate –Private –Public Supreme Court has provided the strongest protection.

Types of SpeechTypes of Speech

• Pure Speech– Calm– Passionate– Private– Public

Supreme Court has provided the strongest protection.

• Symbolic Speech (Expressive Conduct)

– Actions

– Symbols

– May include words

Limited if public safety is endangered.

Types of SpeechTypes of Speech

• Examples of symbolic speech

– Flag burning

– Draft Card burning

– Black arm bands

Types of SpeechTypes of Speech

Freedom of SpeechFreedom of Speech

1. If the regulation is within the constitutional power of government.

2. If the government has a substantial interest unrelated to suppression of speech.

3. If there are ample alternative ways to communicate.

When can government limit or regulate expressive conduct?

When can government limit or regulate expressive conduct?

– Picketing in front of a private residence.

– Approaching people without consent to speak or offer literature within 100 feet of a health care facility (i.e., abortion clinic)

An individual’s Right to Privacy will triumph over Freedom of Speech.

Examples of acceptable limits on expressive speech

Examples of acceptable limits on expressive speech

Freedom of SpeechFreedom of Speech

Regulating SpeechRegulating SpeechRegulating SpeechRegulating Speech

Seditious speech is prohibited.

– Urging resistance to lawful authority

– Advocating overthrow of the government

“Clear and Present Danger” Doctrine (in time of war, things may be different)

“When a nation is at war many things that might be said in time of peace … will not be endured …”

Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. (1919)

Regulating SpeechRegulating SpeechRegulating SpeechRegulating Speech

“Bad Tendency” Doctrine

Example: Yelling “Fire” in a crowded

theater.

Regulating SpeechRegulating SpeechRegulating SpeechRegulating Speech

“Preferred Position” Doctrine

(1st Amendment freedoms are more fundamental than other freedoms)

The government must show that

it is absolutely necessary to limit

Freedom of Speech.

Regulating SpeechRegulating SpeechRegulating SpeechRegulating Speech

Sedition Laws

Dennis v. United States (1951)

Court upheld conviction of 11 communist party leaders who advocated revolution.

Regulating SpeechRegulating SpeechRegulating SpeechRegulating Speech

Sedition Laws

Yates v. United States (1957)

Court overturned convictions of several communist party leaders.

Expressing an opinion that the government should be overthrown is different from urging people to take action.

Regulating SpeechRegulating SpeechRegulating SpeechRegulating Speech

Regulating SpeechRegulating SpeechRegulating SpeechRegulating Speech

Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)

Court ruled in favor of a Ku Klux Klan leader.

While he advocated use of force, he did not urge immediate and concrete acts of violence.

Other Forms of Unprotected Speech

Other Forms of Unprotected Speech

Defamatory SpeechFalse speech that damages a person’s good name, character, or reputation.

Slander – Spoken

Libel – Written

For slander and libel the key is:

1. Was the statement made with the

knowledge that it was false?

2. Was the statement made with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not?

Other Forms of Unprotected Speech

Other Forms of Unprotected Speech

NOTE: For public officials (government, police officers, etc.) or public figures (pastors, athletes, entertainers, etc.) the rules can be very different.

Other Forms of Unprotected Speech

Other Forms of Unprotected Speech

Fighting WordsOffensive, derisive, annoying, etc.

Words that “by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace.”

Other Forms of Unprotected Speech

Other Forms of Unprotected Speech

Fighting WordsFighting Words

Student Speech is LimitedStudent Speech is Limited

Tinker v. Des Moines School District (1969)

Students do not give up

their rights to free speechwhile in school. (Students won.)

HOWEVER …

Bethel School District v. Fraser (1986)

School districts may suspend students for lewd or indecent speech at school events, even though the same speech would be protected outside the school.

School officials can decide whatmanner of speech is appropriate.

Student Speech is LimitedStudent Speech is Limited

The Supreme Court says that schools have broad authority to regulate student speech in school-sponsored newspapers, theatrical productions, and other activities. These things are “part of the curriculum,” not an individual’s personal expression of thought.

Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988)

Student Speech is LimitedStudent Speech is Limited