Twelfth Census of the United States. CENSUS Bu LLETI N. No. 103. WASHINGTON, D. C. October 10, 1901. POPULATION BY SEX, GENERAI.1 NATIVITY, AND COLOR, BY STATES AND TERRITORIES: 1900. This bulletin, prepared nnder the directioh of Mr. WILLIAM C. HuNT, chief statistician for population, com- pletes the series of bulletins in which the population. of the several states and territories in 1000 is distrib- uted by sex, general nativity, and color, the states and territories being ari·anged alphabetically in gToups, as follows: GROUP !.-Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Cali- fornia, Colorado, and Connecticut. (Bulletin No. 66.) GROUP 2.-Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, and Illinois. (Bulletin No. 72.) GROUP 3.-Indiana, Indian T..,erritory, Iowa, and Kan- sas. (Bulletin No. 76.) GROUP 4.-Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, and Massachusetts. (Bulletin No. 78.) GROUP 5.-Michigan, Minnesota, and Mississippi. (Bulletin No. 80.) GROUP 6.-Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, and New Hampshire. (Bulletin No. 84.) GROUP 7.-New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, and North Carolina. (Bulletin No. 88.) GROUP 8.-N orth Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, and Oregon. (Bulletin No. 90.) GROUP 9.--Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Caro- lina, and South Dakota. (Bulletin No. 92.) Cl' 15M G1wuP 10.-Tennessee, Texas, and Utah. (Bulletin No. 95.) GROUP 11.-Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. (Bulletin No. 96.) In each of these group bulletins the population is distrib- uted by sex, general nativity, and color, for each state and territory, for each county, and for each place having 2, 500 inhabitants or more. In this, the final bulletin of the series, the distribution of the population in 1900 by sex, general nativity, and color is summarized by states and territories in tables 1 to 3, while in subsequent tables the figures for each ele- ment of the population in 1900 are brought into compari· son, by states and territories, with similar results derived from the censuses of 1880 and 1890. The designation "native white-native parents," wher- ever used in this bulletin, comprehends all native white persons having either both parents native born, one parent native born and one parent unknown, or both parents un- known, while the designation "native white-foreign parents" comprehends all native white persons having either one or both parents foreign born. The figures contained in this bulletin are derived from the detailed tabulation of the population returns of the Twelfth Census, taken as of June I, 1900, and are subject to correction.
32
Embed
Twelfth Census of the United States....Twelfth Census of the United States. CENSUS Bu LLETI N. No. 103. WASHINGTON, D. C. October 10, 1901. POPULATION BY SEX, GENERAI.1 NATIVITY, AND
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Twelfth Census of the United States.
CENSUS Bu LLETI N. No. 103. WASHINGTON, D. C. October 10, 1901.
POPULATION BY SEX, GENERAI.1 NATIVITY, AND COLOR, BY STATES AND TERRITORIES: 1900.
This bulletin, prepared nnder the directioh of Mr. WILLIAM C. HuNT, chief statistician for population, completes the series of bulletins in which the population. of the several states and territories in 1 000 is distributed by sex, general nativity, and color, the states and territories being ari·anged alphabetically in gToups, as follows:
GROUP !.-Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, and Connecticut. (Bulletin No. 66.)
GROUP 2.-Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, and Illinois. (Bulletin No. 72.)
GROUP 3.-Indiana, Indian T..,erritory, Iowa, and Kansas. (Bulletin No. 76.)
GROUP 4.-Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, and Massachusetts. (Bulletin No. 78.)
GROUP 5.-Michigan, Minnesota, and Mississippi. (Bulletin No. 80.)
GROUP 6.-Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, and New Hampshire. (Bulletin No. 84.)
GROUP 7.-New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, and North Carolina. (Bulletin No. 88.)
GROUP 8.-N orth Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, and Oregon. (Bulletin No. 90.)
GROUP 9.--Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and South Dakota. (Bulletin No. 92.)
Cl' 15M
G1wuP 10.-Tennessee, Texas, and Utah. (Bulletin No. 95.)
GROUP 11.-Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. (Bulletin No. 96.)
In each of these group bulletins the population is distributed by sex, general nativity, and color, for each state and territory, for each county, and for each place having 2, 500 inhabitants or more.
In this, the final bulletin of the series, the distribution of the population in 1900 by sex, general nativity, and color is summarized by states and territories in tables 1 to 3, while in subsequent tables the figures for each element of the population in 1900 are brought into compari· son, by states and territories, with similar results derived from the censuses of 1880 and 1890.
The designation "native white-native parents," wherever used in this bulletin, comprehends all native white persons having either both parents native born, one parent native born and one parent unknown, or both parents unknown, while the designation "native white-foreign parents" comprehends all native white persons having either one or both parents foreign born.
The figures contained in this bulletin are derived from the detailed tabulation of the population returns of the Twelfth Census, taken as of June I, 1900, and are subject to correction.
2
1.-P()PHLATIOX BY SEX, GENERAL N ATIYITY, AND COLOR, BY STA'rES A~D TIDIUUTOfUEJS: l non.
1 Inclusive of 91, 219 persons in the military and naval Rervi<'e of the Un 'ted st t ( · l d" · · · ---'"-state or territory. · · 1 a es me u mg c1v11Iau employees, etc.) Htatione<1 11bro1ul, not creclite<l to any
TABLE 1.-POPULATION BY SEX, GENERAL NATIYITY, AND COLOR, BY STATES ANn TERRITORIES: moo-Cont'd.
STATRS AND TERRITORIES.
NATIVE WHITE.
Native parents.
Foreign parents.
Foreign white.
Total. I Negro.1
COLORED.
Indians Indians taxed. not taxed. Chinese. Japanese.
137, 242 129, 518 The United States 2 ----------------, 41, 053, 417 15, 687, 322 10, 250, 063 9, 312, 58511
Colorado-------------------------------Connecticut-------'----------------------Dela ware--------------------------------District of Columbia--------------------Florida----.:.-----------------------------
1 Includes all persons of negro descent. . a Includes 2,499 pers~ns of mixed parentage, that is, of native Indian and Russian parentage. · 21nclusive of persons in the military and navaJ service of the United States
including civilian employees, etc.) stationed abroad, not credited to any state -or territory.
4
T.A.:BLEl 2.-NATIVE AND FOREIGN BORN AND WHITE AND COLORED POPULATION, OI..iASSIFIED BY SEX, BY STATES AND TERRITORIES : 1900.
NATIVE BORN. FOREIGN BORN. TOT AI, WBT.rE. NAT! VE WHITE.
STA TES AND 'l'ERRI'fORIES.
Males. Females. Males. Females. Males. Females. III ales. Fema1es.
New Hampshire-------------------------------------N e>v Jersey ------------------- -----------------------New li!exico _________________________ ----------------
N e>v York-------------------------------------------North Carolina--------------------------------------
Wyoming __________ ~==-~~:~~==-----~--~:·----·----1 --~5,769 ~9,3~~1 __ 1~415 _ -----~·~- 53,-843 ~2081--~~~~---~·~~2 '.Inclusive of persons in the military and naval sc::rvice of the United States (including civili&n employees, etc.) stationed abroad not credited to any state or
terntory. '
5
'r.rnLE 2.-NATIVE AND FOREIGN BORN AND WHITE AND OOI10RED POPULATION, CLASSIFIED BY SEX, BY STATES AND TERRITORIES: 1900-0ontinued.
STATES AND TERRITORIES.
NATIVE WlII'l'ENATIVI~ PAHENTS.
Males. Females.
The United States2 ---------------------------- 20, 93·1, 099 20, 119, 318
New J:Iampsl ii re-------------------------------------New 1J crsey ------------------------------------------New :Mexico----------------------------------------New York-------------------------------------------North Carolina--------------------------------------
North Dn.kota----------------------------------------Ohio ------------------_____________ ---- __ ---------~--
i Person1:1 of negro descent, Chinese, Japa.nese, and Indiaui:;. (including civilian employees, etc.) stationed abroad, not credited to any state 2Jnclusive of persons in the military and nu.val i;ervice of the United States or territory.
TABLE 3.-NEGRO, CHINESE, JAPANESE, AND INDIAN POPUI1ATION, CLASSIFIED BY SEX, BY STATES AND TERIUTOIUES: 1900.
Connecticut ----------------------------------------Delaware --------------------------------------------District of Columbia ___ ·-----------------------------. Florida ----------------------------------------------
1 Includes all persons of negro descent. (inclu~liug civilian employees, etc.) stationed abroatl, not cretlited to any state~ !I Inclusive of persons in the military and naval service of the United States or territory.
GENERAL SUMMARY.
The total population returned at the rrwelfth Census of the United States, ta;ken as of June I, 1900, as shown by table 1, is '76,303,387, including not only persons enumeratt1<l in the several states and organized territories but, in addition, those enumerated ::Lt military and naval stations abroad (including naval vessels), :1nc1 in Alaska, Hawaii, Indian rrerritory, and Indian reservations. The population for the equivalent areas in 1890, with which this mnnber should be compared, represents a, total of 63, 060, 7 5 6,
including 447, 506 persons specially enumerated 1 but not included as a part of the population (62, 622, 250) covered by the general report at that census. Table 4 presents a immmary of the population according to sex, general nativity, and color at each of the two census periods named, giving comparative :figures in each case for the entire area of enumeration in 1900.
TA.nr,ru 4. -POPULATION OF THI-C UNITED S'I'A'J:Ji.}S BY . SEX, GENERAL NATIVITY, AND COLOR: 18\10 AND
1000.
SEX, «ENimAL NA'l'IVI'rY,
AND COLOR.
AGGREGATES.
1900 1890
Total population_ 76, 303, il87 63, 069, 756 ------
~~f~~se::====::::::::: .I a panese ------------Indian ---------------
1 Decrease.
8,840, 789
l~~·~~~ 266: 760
7,488, 788 126, 778 14,399
273, 607
2 Less than one-tenth of 1 per cent.
11. 6 o. 2 0.1 0.3
14.5
11. 9 0.2
(2) 0.4
1,113, 984
1,352, 001 17, 728 71,liSi 16,847
12.2
18.1 1 6.1
·197. 2 1 2.5
'l1he distribution of the population at the Twelfth Census, according to the several elements of which it is composed, is clearly epitomized in the above table. It shows, :first, the aggregate numbers comprising each class in 1900 as compared with 1890; second, the percentage which each element constitutes of the total population at each census period, and third, the absolute and proportional increase of the several elements since 1890.
li..,rom table 4 it appears, with respect to sex, that the males number 39, 059, 242 and constitute 51. 2 per cent of the total population in 1900, while the females number 37, 244, 145 and constitute 48. 8 per cent. Frnm the percentages given in the above table there has been, apparently, no change in the proportion of the sexes in 1900 as com--------------------
1 Alaska, 32,052; Hawaii (Hawaiian census of December 28, 1890), 89, 990; Indian Territory, 180, 182; Indian reservations, etc., 145,282.
7
pared with 1890, but, as a mfttter of fact, there is a slightly larger proportion of females now than there was ten years ago, the percentage decimals if extencled to the hundredths place showing for females 48.81 per cent in 1900 as compared with 48.76 per cent in 1890, and for males 51.18 in 1900 as against 51. 23 in 1890.
There is a difference in favor of males at the present census of 1,815,097 as compared with an excess of males for the equivalent area in 1890 of 1,560,370, these figures showing, also, that the females have gained relatively wit.h regard to the males since 1890.
There has been an increase in total population of 13,233,631, or 21 per cent, since 1890. This increase is made up of 6,744,1'79 males and 6,489,452 females, representing an increase in males of 20. 9 per cent and an increase in females of 21.1 per cent.
Considered with respect to general nativity, there are, according to the :figures of the present census, 65, 843, 302
native born persons and 10,460,085 foreign born persons, the latter element constituting 13. '7 per cent of the total population in 1900. The equivalent area had h 1890 a total of 9, 308, 091 foreign born persons, representing 14. 8
per cent of the entire population enumern.ted ten years ago. 'The foreign born element of our population has increased
since 1890 only 12.4 per cent as against an increase in native born population of 22. 5. per cent. The foreign born show an absolute increase during the decade of 1,151,994, while ~he native born have increased in ten years 12, 081, 637.
Analyzing the results according to color ancl rn,ce, it is seen tlrnt the population in 1900 is made up of 66, 990, 802
white persons and 9, 312, 585 colored i)ersons, the latter figure comprising 8,840, 789 persons of :negro descent, 119,050 Chinese, 85,986 Japanese, and 266,760 Indians. The corresponding figures for 1890 showed a total of 55,166,184 white persons, 7,488,788 persons of negro descent, 126,778 Chinese, 14,399 Japanese, nnd 273,607 Indians, the total colored element in 1890 comprising, in . all, 7, 903,572 persons.
'l1he colored element constitutes 12. 2 per cent of the total population in 1900 as against 12.5 per cent in 1890,
the negro element alone representing of the total population 11. 6 per cent in 1900 and ll. 9 per cent in 1890.
These figures show a loss, therefore, of three-tenths of 1 per cent in the proportion of persons of negro descent in 1900 as compa1·ed with 1890, and a corresponding increase in that for the whites.
The white population shows an increase since 1890 of 11,824,618, or 21.4 per cent, while the colored element as a whole shows an increase ':fl.uring the same period of 1,409,013, or 17.8 per cent. _ There has been an increase during the past ten yea16 in
persons of negro descent of 1,352,001, or 18.1 per cent, ancl in Japanese of 71,58'7, or 497.2 per cent. riihe Chinese, on the other ha.nd, show a loss since 1890 of 7, 728,
or 6.1 per cent, while the Indians have decreased from 273, 607 in 1890 to 266, 760 in moo, equivalent to a los~ of 2. 5 per cent.
Thti aggregate of GG, 900, 802 white persons in 1900 is macll• up of 56, 740, 739 native white persons, constituting 74.4: per cent of the total population, and 10,250,063
foreign white persons, constituting 13.4, per cent of the total population. Native white persons in 1900 are in turn subdivided into 41,053,417 persons of native parentage and 15, ti8 7 ,322 persons of foreign parentage, constituting, respectively, 53.8 per cent and 20. 6 per cent of the total population. Comparing the percentages for these same elements in l 8HO and 1900 it appears i?hat native white persons constitute a somewhat larger proportion of the total population in 1900 than in 1890, due to a relative increase of 2. 3 per cent in the proportion for native white persons of foreign parentage and a relative decrease of niue-tenths of 1 per cent in the proportion for native white pt•rsons of native parentage.
I'he native white element of our population as a whole has increased 23.3 per cent since 1890, while the foreign white element has increased only 12. 2 per cent. The native white element of foreign parentage has increased during the past ten years relatively twice as fast as the native 'vhites of native parentage, or 18. 9 per cent for those of native parentage as compared with 3G.2 per cent for those of foreign parentage.
As state<l upon the first page of this bulletin, the figures
8
1 upon which the results. presented in table 4 are basc•d nre given in detail by states and territories for 1900 in tables 1 to 3, inclusive, and these figures .for the severnl sta.tes and territories are in turn bronght into comparison with similar results in 1880 and 18DO in tables !l, 10, 15, rn, 17, and 18, respectively. ,.riw figures given in these tables for. 1900 are comparable with those for 1890, but not with those for 1880, as, with the exc~ptiou of Ahtska., there are no figures available in 1880 fo1· the additional a.reas of enumeration comprehended by the census of 1900.
NATIVE AND FOREIGN BORN POPUIJATION.
The native and foreign born population as reported at the censuses of 1880, 1890, ancl 1900 iR distributed by states and territories in table 5; the n.bHolnte a.ud proportional increases from 1890 to 1900, lmHcd upon tlw ligureA given in table 5, are presented for each sta.te and territory in table 6, while the increase in thB foreign horn l'lPmcmt from 1890 to 1900 is brought into comparison with E-dmilal' figures for the preceding decade, by states nrnl territorieA arranged geographically, in table 7. 'rhe popnlntiio11 of each state and territory at the last two census pcrioclt:1, together with the figures of increaso during the <focade in each case, is also shown iu tnhlc ti, for purposes of comparison.
9
T.rnLE 5.-NATIVE AND FOREIGN BORN POPULATION, BY STA'rEs AND TERHITOTUES: 1880 1:0 moo. [For it similar presentation of the native and foreig·n born populntion at the censuses of 1850 to 1870, inclusive, see cemus report on population for 18!10, part I,
page 399. . No c.ensu:-; of Hawaii was htken by the Hawaiian Goverument in rnso. Ko report for Imliim Territory wns miule at the census uf 1880. Oklahoma wa::; urg-1ut1ZL'1.l
Connecticut ---------------------------------------Delaware------------------------------------------District of Columbia ______________________________ _
South Carolina ---------------- --------------------South Dakota.·------------------------------·-------'rennessee------------------------------------------
i Inclusive of 91,219 persons (75,851 native born and 15,8G8 foreig·n horn) in the military and naval service of the United States (including civilian employees, etc.) stationed abroad, not credited to any state or territory.
2 Inclusive of 447,506 persons specially enumerated in 1890iu Alaska (32,052), Hawaii (89,990), and Indian 'l'erritory (180,182), and on Indian reservations, etc. (145.282), credited to states and territories, as follows: Alabama, 384; Arizona, 28,623; Arkansas, 32; California, 5,268; Colorado, 1,051; Idaho, 4,163; Illinois, 1; Iowa 401; Kansas, 1,012; Louisiana, 1; Massachusetts, 4; Michigan, 1: Minnesota,
18,457; Missouri, l; .Montana, 10,765; Nebrm;ka., 3,746; Nevada, 1,594; New
Mexico, 6,689; New York, 5,321; North Carolina, 2; North Dakota, 8,264; Ohio, 13; Oklahoma, 16,641; Oregon, 3,937; Pennsylvania, 99; Soutli Dakota, 19,792; Texas, 4; Utah, 21874; Washington, 7,842; Wisconsin, 6,450; Wyoming, 1,850.
s Exclusive of Alaska, Hawaii, Indian Territory, and Indian reservations. 4 At the census of 1890 all natives of Alaska born previous to its acquisition
in 1867 by the United States were classed as foreign born, but at the census of 1900 all natives of Alaska, irrespective of age, are classed as native born.
5 Not stated in report for 1880.
10
6.-IN·C1REASE IN NA'l'IYE BORN, FOREIGN BORN, AND TOTAL POPULATION, BY srrATES AND TAnLl:
West Virginia _______ -----------------------Wisconsin ______ ------------------ _
Wyoming_---------------------------------
1, 8::!8, ll97 (;;}, 592
12::!, 931
1,311, 564 1, 485, 053
53!l, 700
908, 420 184, 735
278, 718 528, 542
2, 216, i:l31 154, 001 161, 772
·:!, 821, 550 2, 516, 462
392, 060 2, 2;l1, 853
1, 470,-195 2, 1-17, 174 1, 381, 625
694,466 1, 188, 044
2,805, 346 2, 420, 982 1, 751, 394
1,551, 270 3, 106, 665
243, 329
1, 066,300 42,335
411,588 1,883, 669
195,310 7,268,894 1, 893,810
319, 146 4, 157, 545
398,331
413,536 6, 302, 115
428,556
1, 340, 316 401,570
2, 020,GlG
3,048, 710
276, 749 343,641 I
1. 854, 1811 I 518,103
958,800 I 2,069,042
92, 531
1, 513, 401 32, 052 88, 243
1, 128, 211
1, 213, 398
413, 249
746, 258 168, 493
230,392 391,422
1, 837, 353 89, 990
88,548 3, 826, 352
2, 192,404
180, 182
1, 912, 297
1, 428, 108
1,858, 635 1, 118, 588
661, 086 1,042, 390
2, 238, 947 2, 093,890
1, ::ll0, 283
1,28U,600 2,079,185
142, 924 1,062, 656
-17, 355
376,530 l, 4:14, 933
160,282
6,003,174
1, 617, 949
190, 983 3, 672, 329
78,475 317, 704
5,258, 113
345, 506
1, 151, 149 348, 600
1, 767, 518
2,235, 527
210, 779 332,422
1,655, 980
357,232 762, 794
1, 693,330 62, 555
1 I~wlmdve i~ 1900 of 91,219 pen;ollS (75,851 native born aud 15 368 forei n born l 1~1 t?e military. and naval sen·ice of the llnited States (includin civili~n eruplo) ees, etc.; stanon~d abroad, not credited to any state or territolj~
315, 296 31, 540
34, 688 183, 353 271, 655
126, 451
162, 162 16,242 48,326
137, 120
378, 978 61, 011
73, 224
995, 198
324, 058
211, 878
319, 556 42, 387
288, 539
263, 037
33, 380 14fi, 654
i'l6ti, 399 :-m,092
441, 111
261, 670 427, 480
100, 405
3, 644 3 5, 020
35, 058
438, 736 35, 028
1, 265, 720
275, 861
128, 163
485, 216 319, 856
95, 832
1, 044,002
83, 050 189, 167
52, 970 253, 098
813, 183 65, 970 11,219
198,204
160,871
196,006
375, 712
29, 976
20.8
98. ·l 3!J. :l
rn.a 22. ·1
30.li
21. 7 9.ti
21. ()
i!fi.O
20.!i
71.1
82. 7
26. 0 14.8
117. 6
lll.7 3.0 I
lfi. f> I
~:-1.i> I
fi.O
14. 0
25.3
15. H
aa. 7
'.!0.3
16.0
70. 3
0.3 3 lQ, 6
9.3 30. ,1
21. 9 21.1 I
w.1 67.1
13.2
407. 6 30. 2
19. 9
24.0
ltl.4 15. 2
14.3
36.4
31. 3
3.4 12.0
45.0
25. 7 22.2
47. 9
315,481
35,550
29, 250
183,328 270, 724
ll!J,286
107,553 lii,593
4!i,977
136,220
878, 712 15, 104
Gfi,076
870, 798
328, 112
207,020
337, 705
6'1,540
2U7,646 2[1\J, 881
19,011 146,016
377,212
329,310
403, 14\J
2Gl,BU
441i,!l70
76, 434
28,839 3407
19,291
335,827
32,662
936,345
275,071
.96,533
485, 775
306,916
87,401
904,472
54,836
189, 90\J
55, 517 251>, 381
786, 782 65,257
10,fifiO
197, 117
139,512
192,4.38
378, 940 27,474
21.1
2:n.1 •12.1
16.5 32.0
86.2 19. l
10. 0 22. 2
37. 0
20. 7 lll.4 H2. 9
2U. 2
rn.o
114. 9
:.u. 3
li.O 16. n 24.8
8.3 15. ·1 2a.H
21. 2
47.8
:.W.4 18.2
70.6 ll.4
81. 2
6. B 30. 1
21. !l
21.l 17.0
88.1
lli.1 405. 2
:JS. G 20.5
22.9
16.G 21. 6 14.6
37.8
41.4
3. 7 12. 0
52.2
25. 9
32.S 57. 7
8185
a4, 010
5, •1a8 ~m
7, rnr, M,GOO
010 1, S4H
900
200
48, ~l07
7, 148
12·1, 400 a4,0fH
4,858 urn, l.49
:121, 153 :!IJ, 107
a. rnn
14,mm 3~!(12
180, 187 a'..l,227 :n,!Jo2
~\l
:IJH, •HIO 2:3,tl?l
8 2fi, .l\lfi n ·1, nm
tr>, 707
10'2,!JOO 2,306
a2u, aw 7!JO
lll,G30
3fifi!l 12, !J,I()
8,431 U!IJ,li:!O
28,21'1 :17.12
82,5•J7 82,283
26,401
713 059
1,087
21,859
3,568 as, 228
2,502
81. 8 a24.1
~8.'J
0 n
o.a
8. f> :rn. 7
•1.0 7 •)
3. \)
llli. 8 ,(0, u U.H U!,!,I{
llf>. l> aH.H Ulfl,a
6.H
18.2 au . .j 1!8.8 BQ,•1
8.1
0.4
07, \~ li5.U
1112. ·i 1131..i
21.8
31. a 21. (} 1!1. () 21.:1
llH.8 80, 1
•172.3 14. 7 16.fi
26.5 u 11. 8
11:.,!.8
II 11.'1
17.3 1.3. 1.fi 5.U
2:1.7 18.9· •0.6· 16.8
. ~Inclusive of 447,506 persons specially enumeratcdln 18;· ~ut not Incluclcd m t 3 b~~~;~:~. report on population at that censul:l.
1 '
11
TABLE 7.-INOREASE IN FOREIGN BORN, BY STATES AND TERRITORIES ARRANGED GEOGRAPHICALLY: 1sso TO moo.
STATES AND 'fEIU\ITORIES.
The United States _____________________ _
North Atlltntic division -------------------·-·--
:Maine_----------------- __________ ------· __ _
New Hampshire--------------------------Vermont __________________________________ _
Massachusetts --------- ______ .. ------------Rhode Island ____________________________ _
Connecticut-----------···--------- ________ _ N cw York ------------ _. -----------------New .l ersey -------------------------------Pell m;yl vania ______ ------------- ----------
South Atlantic di\'i:o:ioll -----------------------
Dela ware ----------- ___ --'------------- ___ _ l\Iary land ____________ ---------- __________ _ District of Columl.iin _______________________ _
Virginia ______ -------- -------------------West Virginia, ____________ -----------------
North Carolina---------------------------South Carolina------- ___ -----------------Georgia----------------------------------Florilla, ------------------ ------------ -----
New Mexico------------------------------Arizona_-------------'---------------------Utah ____________ --------------------------Nevada---------------------------------.:Idaho_------------------------------------Wi:_i,shiugton ------------------------------Oreg011 ___________________________________ _ California ________________________________ _
24, 010 224.1 I 16,671 --------------48, 907 116.8 41,873 --------------
I ..
1 Inclusive in 1900 of 15,368 foreign born persons in the military and naval service of th~ United States (including civilian employees, etc.) 8tationed abroad, not credited to any state or territory.
2 Decrease.
12
The whole number of persons of native birth in 1900,
as shown by table 5, is 65,843,302 as compared with a total in 1890 of 53, 761,665, the .figures in each case comprehendin(l" the entire area of enumeration in 1900. The foreign bo~·n, on the same basis, now number 10,460,085
as against a tota,l for the same area in 1890 of 9,308,091. Tho figures representing the native and foreign born
elemeuts in 1890 are made np as follows:
AREAS.
~tate~ and territories (general enumeration)----Alaska (specially enumerated) -----------------Hawaii (census of December 28, 1890)-- ~--------Indian 'l'crritory (specially enumerated)--~----Inflian resen·at1ons (specially enumerated)-----
Total~--------------------------------------
Na,tive born.
53, 37~, ~~3 10, .. 81 48, 117
180, 18:.! 145,:28:.!
53, 761, 665
Foreign born.
9,249, 547 16,671 41, 873
9,308,091
As stated in the footnote to table 5, all natives of Alaska born previous to its acquisition in 1867 were classed in 1890 as foreign born, but at ~he census of 1900 all natives of Alaska, irrespective of age, are classed as native born.
The number of na;:tive and foreign born in Hawaii in 1800 was determined from the Hawaiian census report for that year as follows: Native boru-natives, 34,436; halfcastes, 6, 186; Hawaiian born foreigners, 7 ,495; total, 48, 117. Foreign born-Americans, 1, 928; British, 1,344; Germans, 1, 034; French, 70; Portuguese, 8, 602; Norwegians, 227; Chinese, 15,301 ; Japanese, 12, 360; Polynesi:ms, 588; other nationalities, 419; total, 41,873.
The 325,464 Indians and other persons reportecl as living in the Indian Territory and on Indian reservations in
1890 were not classifi.ecl at that census according- to whether they were native or foreign born, but as they wore undoubtedly very nearly all of native birth, they have been so considered for the purposes of this discussion.
Comparing the general results presented in tn.ble O, then~ has been an increase during the decade in native born of 12,081,637, or 22.5 per cent, and in foreign horn of 1,151,994, or 12.4 per cent. 'rhe popnfatiou as a wholt~ increased during the same period 21 per cent. 'rlw increase in foreign born since 1800 h:ts been small as enmpared with the incren.se in the 11ative element, and a gla1wci at the figures presented in table 6 for the several Ht.ates and territories makes it apparent that, aside from tho increases shown by a few of the north central n.nd we:-;torn states and territories, practically a.11 the increase in the foreign born element is confined to the North A1ilautic states. The full purport of this ch:tnge in the difitrilmtion of this element of our popnlu.tion throughout tlw country, especially as compn.red with the eonditi011H whieh prevailed during the preceding decade, is not sem1 uu ti I the results are presented in the geographical order of tlw states and territories, as indicat<.>d by table 7.
Leaving out of consideration the foreign born in Alm~ka and Hawaii in 1890 and 1900, and those enumera.ted in 1900 at military and naval stations abroad and~ thereforn, not credited to any state or territory, there rmnains a total of 10,341,276 foreign born persons in llJOO as compar<1<l with 9,249,547 in 1890 and 6,671:.1, 943 in 1880. ~L1he dif.1-tribution of the foreign born element by geographical divisions at the last three census periods was as follows :
The United States ______________________ _ 10, 341,276 9, 249, 547 6, 679, 943 1, 091, 729 11.8 2,569, 604 B8.r1 -==========-1 c=c========l=========-~11 ::.::=.=:::.:~.::-:=:::::-.:~·::--~ :.,:..~~::::::::::-... ·:~ ·-----::~;.:.:::;::::::=~~ ---~-·~·-··.-~
North Atlantic division_______________________ 4 w59 796 1 South Atlantic division__________________ __ '216; 030 North Central division-------------------=---- 4, 158, 474 ~uth Central division----------------------== 3fi7, 655
Aecording to this summary, the foreign born element in the United States proper has increased c1 uring· the last teu years only 1,091,729, or 11.8 per cent, as against an increase from 1880 to 1890 of 2,5G9,604, or 38.5 per cent. . The proportional loss in the increase of the foreign born is even more appar~nt when the results for the several geographical divisions during the past two decades are compared. 'l1he figures of increase for the last ten years show that the North Atlantic division is the only section of the country in which the foreign born have the same p.roportional increase as the native element of the populat10n, the per:e11tages of increase _in this division during the decade hPmg 22. 5 for the foreign born and 20. 5 for the natin~ born. 'l'here was au increase however in th f . ' ' e ore1gn bo1:It in thi~ division from 1880 to 181:!0 of 38.1 per
cent, showmg that m this division even there has been a very materiaJ falli11g off in the persons of foreign birth.
Of the whole nnmber of foreign born in the United States proper in 1890, considerably more than two-fifths
were found in the North Central diviHion, the foreigu born in this division having increased from 2,UH>,820 .ill 1880 to 4,060, 114 in 1890, representing an increaHe in tern years of 1,143,285, or 39.2 per cent. 'rlwre lrnH been au in?ren.~e. ~n foreign born during the last ten yettrs in this d1v1s10n of only 98,360, or 2.4 per t•t•nt, and if tlw inc.re~se for this division is considered hy stat.PF:! (sec tal)h~ 7) it is seen that there has beeu an i11ere:t1·w in 3 statcH only, namely, Illinois, 124,400; l\finnesota, 37, 062; and North. Dakota, 31,630. '11he total increase of tho foreign bor~ m th.ese 3 states since 1890 amountH to l ua, UU:&,
aga1~st. which there was a decrease in foreign horu in the rem~mmg states of this division of 95,632, making tho net mcrease for the division as a whole !l8, a oo. ·
'l1here has been an increase of not quite 10 per cent in
persons of foreign birt~ in the Westeru division during the past ten years as agamst an increase of more than 50
per c~nt during the preceding decade. In 1880 there were practwally half a million (500, 062) for0ign horn versons
in this division, and this had been increased in 18 90 to 770, 910, representing an increase in ten years of 270, 848, or 54. 2 per cent. During the past ten years, however, there has been an increase of foreign born in this division of only 7 5,411, equivalent to 9. 8 per cent, making a total for 1900 of 846,321. With the exception of Nevada, which has decreased in both native and foreign born, there has been a gain since 18 90 in foreign born in each state and territory comprising the Western division, but the ·proportional increases for Utah and California are nominal only, being 1. 3 per cent for the former and threetenths of 1 per cent for the latter. The largest numerical increases in the foreign born in this diviRion during the past ten years are 23, 971 for :Montana, equivalent to an increase of .55.6 per cent, and 21,359 for Washington, equivalent to an increase of 23. 7 per cent.
In the South Atlantic division the foreign born increased 7,505, or3.6 percent, from 1890 to 1900 as against an increase from 1880 to 1890 of 34,267, or 19. 7 per cent· In :Maryland and South Carolina there has been a positive loss in foreign born since 1890, the loss in Maryland representing 362 persons as compared with an increase for the 1)receding decade of 11,490. There was also an increase of foreign born in Florida from 1880 to 1890 of 13,023, but during the past ten years this element in that state has been increased by 900 only, making the foreign born now number 23,832 as against 22, 932 in 1890.
In the South Central division the foreign born have increased 11.1 per cent since 1890 as compared with an increase during the preceding ten years of 17. 3 per cent. ':l1here has been a large numerical increase in the foreign born during the ·last ten years in Texas and Oklahoma, and
13
·:i bl d 1· · .i-11 e 1• 1• nurnlwr in J{p111m·k\· nnd a consmera e ec lne lll 11 · · • •
· · d 'I'he foreigrn liorn iu Tennessee durmg the same per10 · · ' ·. . • T b 179 35 7 as against 152, H50 m H:l!lO, a.1ul exas now num er , < ·
those in Oklahoma 15 680 as agniru~t; 2, 'l·iO l<• 11 yt>:LrH :i.go, , I . the latter territory having been opened tn ~titt. munut rn May, J 890, just prior to the census cm un11•ra.t1011.
The concentration in the northeastc~rly tlt:ttl's of the•
increase in the foreign born during th<> Jn~t dt>;~a.'1~· iH emphasized when its distribution by geogr:i.ph1cal dtVJl-ilnll!-'
is expressed in percentages, as folloWH:
GEOGRAPHICAL DIVISIONS. lHO() tn too<> 18HO to 1 "\llO
J>er <'rt1t: i Prt· t•111I. 100. 0 i 11111. 0 The United States--------------------------.
8<.l.1 ·I I. K 0.7 1.:1 U.11 ·11.i• ~I. a I. !I Ii. \I HI. f>
North Atlantic division _________________________ _ South Atlantic division--------------------------North Central division __________________________ _ South Central division------------------------ ---Western division _____________________ ------------
From this table of percentages it app<><tl'H that, of tlw total increase in foreign born frou1 1880 to 1 H~lO, 44.ri l'Pr cent was in the North Central division and 41.8 per <'Nit,
in the North Atlantic division, w hcr(!H.A :for thn (foc~rtdl' ending in 1900 only 9 per cent of the incrrnum in tlrn foroign born is found to be in the North CcmtraJ diviHinu lLH oom· pared with 80.1 per cent in the North Atlantio cliviaio11. This concentration in the latter divhiion of four-fifths of the increase in the foreign born ele1nm1t Hirwt• l HOO iH <11w to a very decided change in the charaoter of t lw immigra· tion in recent years,-a change which b(~gn.n to lw :Lpp:trPnt at the census of 1890, but which has progrt~Hr:·mil 1-1iurn~ :tt a very rapid rate, as shown by the following sumtnary of tlw immigration figures from 1821 to the preHunt. titn(\:
Canada and Newfoundland ________________________ _
g~~a~ilfuin-::::::::::::::::::=======::::::=::::::: Ireland----------------------------------------------Norway and Sweden--------------------------------
All other countries----------------------------------
100.0
0.1 13. 7 7.4
10.5 8.7
40.4
16. l 17. 7 16.3
50.1
9.5
100.0
7.5 27.7 15,4 12.5 10.8
73.9
6. 7 5.9 5.0
17.6
8.5
1 Estimated for year ending June 30, 1899.
100.0 100.0
6.7 34.0 26.2 18.8 4.7
100.0
90. 4 01.2
1.1
8.5
100.0
o.n
This table shows, first of all, that even up to 1890 the llatives of Germany, Ireland, Great Britain, Canada and Newfoundland, and Norway and Sweden practically dominated the immigration to this country, these five classes combined having contributed very nearly 13,000,000
(12,711,3 ll) out of a totnl of 15,427,657 immigrants to • Tune 30, 1890. From 1891 to 1900, however, they have contributed out of a total of 3,fJ87,564 immigrants only 1,489, 695, or a little more than two-fifths as against very nearly three-fourths for the ten-year period ending in 1890,
more than four-fifths for that ending in 1880, and fully nine-tenths for those ending in 1870 and 1860, respectively.
It also shows that this decline in the proportion represented by the heretofore dominant factors of our immigration h~s been in part offset by a very material increase during the past ten years in the proportion of immigrants arriving from Austria-Hungary (including Bohemia), Italy, Russia, and what was formerly Poland, countries from which prior to 1880 no considerable amonnt of immigration had been received. Since 1880 they have come into the country very rapidly, so that, although they constituted only about 1 per cent of all the immigrants during the ten years ending in 1870 and only 6.4 per cent of those who arrived during the decennial period ending in 1880, they represented more than one-sixth of the total number of immigrants from 1881
to .1890 and folly one-half of all from 1891 to 1900. In fact, for the decade just closed, each of these three classes of immigrants constitutes a larger proportion of all the immigrants than is shown for any of the countries from which the bulk of the imrnigra.tion formerly came. Germany, which contributed more than one-third of all the immigrants for the ten-year periods ending in 1860 and 1870 and more than one-fourth of all the arrivals during the next two periods, has furnis~ecl barely one-seventh of the immigrants during the past ten years, while Ireland, which contributed more than two-fifths of all the immigrants from is21 to 1850, more than one-third of those from 1851 to 1860, and very nearly one-tifth of those from 1861 to 1870, has furnished but a little more than one-tenth of the total number for the decade en cling in 1900. Besides the change in the character of the more recent i°mmigration, there has been a considerable diminution in the munber of immigrants since 1890, or practically 1,500,000 less immigrants from 1891 to 1900 than from 1881 to 1890.
These two reasons will account largely for the large proportion of the increase in the foreign born during the decade shown for the northeastern states at:1 compared with the relatively small increases shown for the other sections of the country in which the decline in the older foreign elements has not been offset to any great extent by the introduction of the newer classes of immigrants.
Of the entire population in 1900 the native born con-. stitute 86. 3 per cent and the foreign born 13. 7 per cent.
This is not as large a proportion of foreign born as in 1890, when this element constituted 14.8 per cent of the total population as against 85. 2 per cent for the native born. The varying percentages of foreign born in the several states and territories in· 1890 and 1900 are given in table 8.
14
TA_BLE 8.-PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND FOREIGN BORN OF TOTAL POPULATION, BY STATES AND TERRITORIES ARRANGED GEOGRAPHICALLY: 1890 AND 1900.
Dela ware---------------------------Maryland------- ___ -----------------D~str:ic~ of Columbia _______________ _
i~~tvii-i1ii1a======================= North Carolina--------------------South Carolina -·--------------------Georgia----------------------------Florida-----------------------------
1 Includes persons in the. militarv and naval service of the Unitetl States (including civilian employees, etc.) stationed abroad, not credited to any state or territory.
In the United States proper the largest proportion of foreign born is found in North Dakota, this element constituting 35.4 per cent of the entire population of that state in 1900 as compared with 42. 7 per cent in 1890,
the total population at the latter census including Indians and othe1· persons specially enumerated. 'rhe next largest percentages of foreign born in 1900 are 31.4 for Rhode Island, 30. 2 for Massachusetts, 28. 9 for Minnesota, 27. 6 for Montana, 26.2 for Connecticut, and 26.l for New York. These are all the states that have, approximately, one-fourth at least of their population of foreign birth, but there are, also, 9 other states which have between 20
and 25 per cent of foreign born, namely, \Visconsin, California, Nevada, New Jersey, Michigan, South Dakota, ·w ashington, New Hampshire, and Illinois.
rrhe other extreme is found in the south, where the percentages of foreign born vary from two-tenths of 1 per -cent in North Carolina to 7.·9 per cent in Maryland, but very nearly all the states in this section have considerably 1ess than 5 per cent of foreign born within their borders.
15
In Hawaii there is a very large foreign element, representing very nearly three-fifths ( 5 8. 9 per cent) of the total population in 1900, but in Alaska not quite one-fifth (HI. 9
per cent) of the population in 1900 is of foreign birth. The relative proportions of foreign to native born, that
is, the number of foreign born to each 100,000 native born, in 1890 and 1900, respectively, are shown by states and territories in table 9.
TABLE 9.-REI.JATIVE PROPORTIONS OF FOREIGN TO NATIVE BORN, BY STATES AND TERRITORIES ARRANGED GEOGRAPHIOALL Y: 1890 AND 1900.
Dela ware ________________________ ----_--------Mary land ------------------------------------D!sti:ic~ of Columbia-------------------------V1rg1n1a _____________________________________ _
West Virginia--------------------------------North Carolina ______________________________ _
South Carolina------------------ __ -----------Cieorgia --------------------------------------Florida __________________________________ -----
North Central division __________________________ _
NUMBER OF FOREIGN BORN TO EACH 100,000 NATIVE BORN.
~: m I J~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~!~!~~~=~~~ iZ: jtJ Ii Ila wai'-----------------------------------------
17,937 24,fi54 27,380 :33,681 18,905 32,853
22,012 43,243
24,859 108, 387 143,592 87,023
I Inclmles persons in the military and naval service of the United States (including civilian employees, etc.) stationed abroad, not credited to any state or territory.
At the census of 1890 there were, according to the foregoing table, 17,314 foreign born to each 100,000 native born, but this proportion has been reduced iu 1900 to 15,886.
'l1hese :figures apply to the entire area of enumeration in 1900, but, if Alaska and Hawaii are excluded, the relative proportions are 15, 757 in 1900 and 17,225 in 1890. There has been a relative increase in the proportion of foreign born in all the New England states, except Vermont, and, also, in New Jersey, North Carolina, and Oklahoma, but all the other states and territories show a decrerwe since 1890.
rnie large proportion of foreign to native born reported for Alaska in 18 9 O is due to the inclusion as foreign born of all natives born prior to 1867, as previously explained.
MALE AND FEMALE POPULATION.
The number of males and females returned at the last th1·ee census periods is presented in detail. by states and territories iu table 1 o, while their absolute and proportional increase from 1890 to 1900 is shown in table 11.
16
TABLE 10.-:MAiiE AND FEMALE POPULATION, BY STATES AND TERRITORIES: 1880 TO 1900.
fFor a similar presentation of the male and female population at the censuses of 1850 to 1870, inclusive, see census report on population for 1890, part I, page 308. :Ro censm1 of Hawaii was taken by the Hawaiian Government in 1880. No report for Indian Territory was made at the census of 1880. Oklahoma was organized
~ ::'::·_::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::i New Hampshire _______________________________ i
New Jersey---··-------------------------------New Mexico-----------·-·---------------------New York --------·----··--·----------------------North Carolina--------------------------------
North Dakota ________ ---------------------- ____ _
l Inclusive of 91,219 persons (90,553 males and 666 females) in the military and naval service of the United States (including civilian employees, etc.) stationed abroad not credited to any state or territory.
(145,282), in certain states and territories. (See footnote (2) to table 5, page 9.} B Exclusive of Alaska, Hawaii, Indian Territory, and Indian reservations. 4 Not stated in report for 1880.
2 Inclusive of 447,506 persons specially enumerated in 1890 in Alaska (32,052), Hawaii (89,990), and Indian Territory (J~0,182), and on Indian re.servations, etc.
1 Includes 91,219 persons (90,558 males and CiG6 females) in the military and naval Rerviee of the United ::ltntcs (including civilian employees, etc.) stat1011ecl abroad, not credited to auy state or territory.
2 Decrease.
The whole numl)er of males for tbe entire area of enumeration in 1900 is 39, 059, 242 and the whole number of females, 37,244,145. r.rbese figures are to be compared with a total for 1890 of 32,315,063 males and 30, 7 54, 693 females, made up as follows:
• -\REAS. Males. Females .
States and territories (general enumeration)---- 32, 067, 880 30,554,370 Alaska (specially enumerated) ------------------ 19,248 12,804 Hawaii (census of December 28, 1890) ----------- 58, 714 31, 276 Indian Territory (specially enumerated) -------- 96,586 83,596 Indian reservations (specially enumerated)----- 72, 635 72, 647
In the ten years from 1890 to 1900 the males have increased 6,744,179, or 20.9 per cent, while the females have increase~ 6,489,4-52, or 21.1 per cent. The females have increased, therefore, during the ten years at a slightly
greater rate than the males, the increase in the population as a whole for the same period being 21 per cent.
No direct comparison can be made with the results for the preceding decade, as the census of 1880 did not comprehend the same area of enumeration covered by the last two censuses. The figures for the present census when compared with those for 1890 show, however, that the greater rate of increase in females during the decade is due to an increase in their proportion in the north central ancl western sections of the country. The males predominate in these sections, especially in the western states and territories, but owing to the change in the chartwtei· of the immigration since 1890 and the presence in these sections of a greater proportion of the older classes of immigrants, there has been a much greater increase in females than in males, so that in these states the females represent a considerably larger proportion of the total population in 1900 than they did in 1890. In all the states comprising the North Atlantic section of the country, and in most of the states in the South Atlnntic section, the males show a slightly increased proportion in 1900 as compared with 1890, these being the older states of the Union in which the conditions with respect to sex are much more nearly normal than in the other sections of the country. The distribution of the population of the several states and territories in 1890 and 1900 according to sex is expressed in percentages in table 12, the states and territories being arranged geog1~aphically for convenience of comparison.
T.A.BLlll 12.-PEIWENTAGE OF MALES AND FEMALES OF TOTAL POPULATION, BY STATES AND TERRITORIES ARRANGED GEOGRAPHICALLY: 1890 AND 1900.
STA'rJ'S A.ND TERRITORIES.
The United States _______________ _
North Atlantic division-----------------
JYiaine _____________________________ ;.._
~ ~:'m~~~-~~~:~:=======:=:::=::::::: Massachusetts ---------------------Rhode Island----------------------Connecticut ------------------------New York __________________________ _
New Jersey -------------------------Pennsylvania ______________________ _
South Atlantic division-----------------
Delaware---------------------------Maryland __________________________ _ D~st1:ic~ of Columbia _______________ _ V1rg1111a _______ ----------·-----------West Virginil•----------------------North Carolina---------------------South Carolina ___________________ ;,. __ Georgi ii __ --------------------------Florida -----------------------------
i Includes J?ersons in the military ancl naval service of the United States (inclu~ing civilian employees, etc.) stationed abroad, not credited to any state or terntory.
TABLE 12.-PERCENTAGE OF MALES AND FEMAI1ES OF TOTAL POPULATION, BY STATES AND TERRITORIES ARRANGED GEOGRAPHIOALL Y: 1890 AND 1900-Cont'd.
For the entire area of enumeration in 1900 the males constitute 51.2 per cent and the females 48.8 per cent of the total population, or substantially the same proportions shown for the equivalent areas in 1890. In the North Atlantic and South Atlantic divisions, considered as a whole, there is an equal proportion .of males and females in 1900, but at the census of 1890 there was, in each case, a slightly larger proportion of females. In each of the 3
remaining divisions of states and territories the males represent a larger proportion of the total population than the females, and in the Western division the percentage in favor of the males is very large, or 56. 2 for males as against 43. 8 for females. In all the states and territories of this division the males constitute a large proportion of the to~al population, and this is. particularly the case in Montana, ·wyoming, and Nevada, where they represent more than 60 per cent of the entire population.
There is a very large proportion of males in both Alaska and Hawaii in 1900, the percentage of males in the former territory being 72.1 ancl in the latter, 69.1.
l?or the United States in its entirety, the males exceed the females in 1900 by 1,815,097, distributed by general nativity and color as follows:
Of the 1,815,097 males in excess, the foreign whites number 841,603, or 46.4 per cent, ancl the native whites of native parentage 814, 781, or 44. 9 per cent, these two elements combined representing more than nine-tenths of the entire excess. The only element of the population· in which there is not a preponderance of males is that of persons of negro descent, which shows, for the country as a whole, an excess of 54,347 females.
Considering the excess of males (or females) with reference to the proportion which it bears to the whole number of persons comprising each element of the population, the following percentages are obtained:
~~Fut:-~;~~~====================::::::::: Japanese _________________________ :_ _______ _
Indian ------------------------------------
Total number.
76,303, 387
41,053,417 15,()87,322 10!250, 063 8,840, 789
119, 050 85, 986
266, 760
1 Excess of females.
EXCF.SS OF 111.ALES.
Per cent Number. of totnl
number.
1, 815, 097 2. 4
814, 781 2.0 50, 856 0.3
8'11,003 8.2 154, 3117 l 0. 6 103, 058 86. () 5n, 786 61:i. o
2, 360 o. u
From this summary it appears that the excess of males constitutes 2 per cent of all the native whites of native parentage, 8. 2 per cent of all the foreign whites, 86. 6 per cent of all the Chinese, and 66 per cent of all the .Japanese, while for the remaining elements the excess of males (or females) constitutes less than I per cent in each case.
rrhe sexes are distributed very unevenly throughout the country as indicated by table 13, which shows the excess of males (or females) by states and territories arr~nged geographically.
19
TABLE 13.-TCXOESS OF M.ALES DISTRIBUTED BY GENER.AL NATIVITY .AND COLOR, BY STATES AND TERRITORIES ARRANGED GEOGRAPHIC.ALLY: 1900.
'\ STA'l'F.'l AND TERRITORIES.
The United States 2 _____________________ : ____ _
N nrth Atlantic division ___________________________ _
Vermont ---------------------------------------Massachusetts---------------------------------Rhode Island ----------------------------------Connecticut ____________________________ ------ __
New York _____ --··------------------------------New J erseY------------------------------------ _ Pennsylvania ----------------------------------
South Atlantic division----------------------------
Dela·ware--------------------------------------Maryland --------------------------------------District of Columbia---------------------------Virginia----------------------------------------West Virginitt __________________________________ _ North Carolina ________________________________ _ South Carolina ________________________________ _
·· 10 wa ----------------------·---------------------.!l!issouri _____________________________ -----_____ _
North Dakota----------------------------------South Dakota--··------------------------------Nebraska--------------------------------------Kansas -----------------------------------------
South Central division-----------------------------
1 Includes all persons of negro descent. 2 Inclusive of persons in the military and naval service of the United States (including civilian employees, etc.) stationed abroad, not credited to any state or
territory. a Excess of females.
20
In all bnt 11 of the states and territories in 1900, as shown by table 13, the males exceed the females. 'rlie 11 states (i~cluding the District of Columbia) in which there is ::m excess of females are all situated on the Atlantic coast and are summarized in their geographical order, together with the numerical excess of females in each case, as follows: New Hampshire, 830; 1Vfassachusetts, 70,398;
Rhode Island, 7,524; New York, 39,334; New Jersey, 149; Maryland, 9,494; District of Columbia, 14, 710; Virginia, 2,390; North Carolina, 16,456; South Carolina,
due, in the first case, to an excess princip:illy of na.tiv(• white nutles of native parentage and of foreign white males, and in the latter largely to an exceBs of nrnleH among the Chinese and Japanese elements of the popula-
tion. The relative 1)roportions of females to malns, 1;lm1i iH,
the number of females to each 100,000 nmles, iH shown for the several states and territories in table 14.
10,526; and Georgia, 9,D~9. 'The largest numerical excess of females in any state in
l 000 is that for Massachusetts, where out of a total popu-
MALES, BY sr:rATES AND TEIUU':PORirnS AltHANUJGO GEOGRAPHIOAIJLY: 1800 AND 1900.
STA'.l'ES ANJJ 'l'lmRrronIES.
The United St!tteR-----------------··-----
lation of !&,805,346 there are 70,398 more females than males. This excess of females in Massachusetts is common to each element of the population, with the exeeption of the Chinese, Japanese, and Indian, which are not numerically important and in which there is an excess of males. The next largest excess of females is found in North Atlantic (liviHiou ________ ---------·--·"·----
New York, or an excess of 39, 334 females in a total popu- Maine----------------------------····----·-·""""·--
lation in 1900 of 71,268,894. ~rhe excess in this state is ~~~'iu~:~f-~~1~~~~==============:==::==·:==:==::~:~ confined to native whites of native and foreign parentage ~l~~~{i;,~~~l~~{i\~=::::=:===========~===::::··:===== and to negroes, the foreign whites, Chinese, Japanese, ConnecticnL _______ ... ___________ . ___ .. ·--·-·
New Yorlr --------------------· ________ "" ". -·
and Indians showing in each case an excess of males. The New .Tersc'Y----------"·-------------····--Pennsyl vani!t -------------------· .. "- __ ·"··--
excess of females in New Jersey is nominal only, being south Atlnutic di viHiotL.._ --------------- _______ "_
_hut 149 out of a total population of 1,883,669. In the North Atlantic division, there is an excess of
males in 4 states only, namely, Maine, Vermont, Connecticut, and Pennsylvania. The total excess of males in these 4 states is 121,294, which is offset by an excess of 118 235 fenu1les in the other 5 states of this division, maki~g a net excess of males for the division as a whole of 3 059.
;.~;~\r~t%~~f f /J;f E~:f ~~~g~~~~c;;~ llt~;i:~~:i~i!!li~!!i!!!i/::::::: r:~a:nder of the division, or a net excess of males for the South Central division d1v1Slon of 1,710. There is a large excess of males in -------------------"·----"·-
::~:I~~~:~~~l~: t~~~gf ;:l~;~~i;.:;; 0
;~;:;;~ If J;'110''i!i;;;i!!ii;i::~:;~:::;:_-;;i fei_nales, the total excess of males in each of these divisions hemg as follows: North Central 845 640. S th C t 1 Western division ____________________ " ____ "-------··
'""' '""' ' ' ' OU en Ta' M
~!~it ~:~~~1W.~;f ;11I~!:1~;:~~~[;~11~ l~~~!iiii!!ii!'.iii:_~~--;_=~_:: ___ i=;_ii_i __ -_i-_i=~_i __ -i __ --~ native parentage. In this division there is also an excess . - --
. !iH, 02l:I UO, fi!.!J 4,1, 780 ~1. 2t~ ~!<:i:::.les among persons of negro descent and among the fr~~~~i:============::=:::=::=::::::=:::==========
• 1 Includes persons in the militar . . 1------"-~---: 1
T'h · ere is a large exceBs of males in Aiaska and Hawaii, (mcluding civilian employees etc ) lta~lH id1aval scrvrne of tlw Ciullt•d Htntt•!i or territory. '' · ' one abroad, not erctlitt!tl to HllY Htat.1•
According to the figures contained in table 14, the females have increased relatively to males since 1890,
there being to each 100,000 males, for the country as a whole, 95, 353 females in 1900 as compared with 95, 171 females in 1890. The figures up0n which these proportions are based include those for Alaska and Hawaii, but excluding these two territories the proportions are 95, 558 females to each 100,000 males in 1900 as against 95,265 females in 1890.
l'he females have decreased relatively to males since 1890 in all the states comprising the North Atlantic division and in all but Georgia, South Carolina, and the District of Columbia in the South Atlantic division. rrhere has been a relative decrease, also, of females in Ohio, Indiana, and North Dakota, in the North Central
21
division; in Kentucky, 'l'eunessee, Alabama, and Louisiana, in the South Central division, and in Arizona, in the Western division.
In the remaining states and territories there has been an ' increase in the relative proportions of females to males in 1900 as compared with 1890, particularly in the far western states and territories and in Oklahoma.
WHITE AND NEGRO POPULATION,
A detailed presentation of tbe white and negro population at the last three census periods is made by states and territories in table 15, while similar presentations are made for the Chinese and Ja.panese population in table 16,
for the Indian population in table 17, and for the native and foreign white population in table 18.
22
T.rnr,g 15.-WHITE AND NEGRO POPUI1ATION. BY STATES AND TERRITORIES: 1880 TO moo. [Fnr a similar presenttition of the white and negro population at the censuses of 1850 to 1870, inclusive, see census report on. popullttion for 1890, Jl!Ll't I,
p1ii::-~,~~'.~ll!i\L'i of ~fawaii wa." taken by the Hawaiian Government in 1880. No report for Indian Territo~y was made at the census of 1880. Oklahmnn. was orgn11lzcd
as a territory May:!, lSlJO.]
WHI'fE. NEGit0.1
STA'ff:S AND 1•munTORIES. 1880 1900 1890 1900 1880 1890
~ Irwl11tl.t's itll persons of ne"ro d •s' t i - lnelu1'1ve !>f 90,tiU:l person8 S4 .~·,ce1~ '. ,
ft:Wl naval service of the United lStat~~ ('~ 111ie U;lld li 13~4. negro) in tile military tiou.ed alm:~ad, not credited to any ~ta't , me ud~ng c1v1han employees etc ) sta-
·1 I1~clus1vc of 182,294 white • c .o~ t~rritory. ' · Hawaii, and Indian Territor ,pe~ons ~pecin:lly enumerated in 1890 in Alaska ~lo states and territories Jrollo~·~-n~dian reservations, etc. (7114) cred~ N~ • .,11!,h~~; Iowa,4; Kansas,66; Minneso~o11~l54; California, 161'; Coiorado,
e1'--, .,, • New Mexico, 1gg; New York 3~' N 'rtMhontana,419; Nebraska 208· ' • 0 Dakora, 284; ·oklahoma:
600, 103 833, 718
4,298 55, 734
818, 752
1, 111, 833
662, 185 430
35,160 591,531 767,181
827,307
168 1,8,18
360,85()
11, Q.15
678,·189 0112
1,3[>7
B09,117
11,322
-___ , ... _.., __ ... _____ :, __
404, 534
733,438 140, 066 154, ti95
224, 949
978, 357
60, 628 82, 117
S, 768,472 2,1·1fi, 7i::16
'110, '.!54 1, 901, 0\10
1,376, 619
1,590,4li2 51i8, 395
659, 263
826,41!3
2,215,373 2,072,884
1,296,408
544,851 2,528, 458
127,690
1, 0.17, 096 39, 121
375,84.0 l,39ti, 581
1·12, 918 5,923, 955 1,055, 382
182, 407 S,58,1,805
62, 300
301, 982
5,148,258
337, 859 462, 008
328,010
1,336, 637
1, 745, 935 205, 925
331,418 1,020,122
340,829
730,077 1, 680, 828
59,324
191,126
610, 769
120, 160 118,006
142,605
816, 90(i
29,013
3, 031, 151
1,938, 798
1, 61<1, 600
952, 155 1,377, 179
45'1,954
tHG,852 721, ()93
1, 1t1a, 1s2 1, 614, 560
776, 884
479, 398 2,022,8:W
:m,mm 4,19, 764
53,f>fiO
346, 229
1,092,017 108, 721
5. Olti,022
S67,242
36,192 3, 117, 920
163, 075
4, 197, 016
269, 939 391, 105
96, 955 1, 138, 831
1, 197, 237
142,423 331, 218
880, 858
67, 199
592, 537 1,309, 618
19, 437
8,570
15,226 30,1.iU7
86, 702
230, 730
1, 0.14, 813 '..!33
2U3
85,078
57,u05
:rn,858 12,698
f>2,003 284, 706 6f>(), 804
1,819 235, 0(14
31, 971
15,Slfl 4, 9fiU
907,1\:10
rn1I23•1 l,fl23 6,269
1:H
(162
69, 8-14
1,010 \lU, 232
62•1,·169
286
96, 901
18,8:11 1,105
156,845
9,092
782, 321
46ii
480, 2·13
620, 722
072
826 660, 722
2,514 43, 499
2,M2
940
6,21ri 12,302
28,:l8ti 7fi,fi72
160,180
8fi8,8Ui
201
57,028 4fi,2lfi
18,()36
10,085 49, 710
208,071 5fi9, l!J3
1,190 21fi, (j[17
22,144.
lfi, 223 8,083
7•i2,lifJ9
150, 18-i 1, tlOO
8,llla 242
01.4 47,oas l,ll50
70,01)2
fiGl,018
873 87, 113 2,07ll l, 186
107, liUO
7,llll3
688, 034 541
480, ti78
488, 171 688 937
685, 438
1,602
82, 690
2,444 922
1135 210, OOG
6, 018.
2,\lB5· ll,li-17 211, 1M'l rm, liUH
120,0llO
1:.in,1:m
5:1 dG,HOH 39,2'.Ui
ll,lilfi ·1:1, 107
271,4ril 48:1,nnr,
] I ilfil 210, 2:m 1H,lm7 15, 101) 1,fi!H
650, 2!ll Hu,:lf>O
:MU
2,l!Hf> 488
mm 88, 8!i!I
1,0!fl 65, l0°l
5:11,277
11a 79,000
'187 85,f):lli
0,4HH (l{)·J,ami
!.!AA 403, lfil
:ma,a&1 2.'l2
l,Ori?
1.131, 0.16
:32/i 25,88n 2,702
298
3,474; Oregon, 224; Pennsylvania 1. S tl ]) . -----,··-~ 316; Wiscon~i11, 355; Wyoming 49 ' ou 1 akota, 720 i Utah, 26; WMhingtou,
4 Exclus1ve of the pop 1 c' 'f H . •Inclusive of 18 4l u a ion ° ,.awah and Indian Territory. Indian Territory. 17 8 negroes specially enumerated in 1890 in Ahiska 1md
6Negroes, mulattoes Haw 'i 11 M 1 the fape Verde islands. ' ai a s, a ays, and Portuguese mulattoes from Includes 861 persons not classified by color.
28
TABLE 16.-CI-IINESE AND .JAPANESE POPULATION, BY STATES AND TERRITORIES: 1880 TO moo. [For a similar presentation of the Chinese and Japanese population at the censuses of 1860 and 1870, see census report on population for 1890, part I,
page 401. . No census of Hawaii was taken by the Hawaiian Government in 1880. No report for Indian Territory was made at the census of 1880. Oklahoma was orgamzed
Dela ·ware ---------·-- ___ ------------------------------District of Col nm hiiL. ___ -------------------- ·-------Florida----------------------------------------------
Virginia ---------------------------------------------
Washington _____________ ---- ------------------------ _
West Virginia----------------------------------------Wisconsin ------------------------------.. -----------Wyoming-------------------------··------------------
1119,0fiO
58 3,116 1,419
62 4f>, 753
599 fill9
fil
455 120
204 25, 767 1,467 1,503
207
27 104
39
57 599
119 544
2,968 240 166
287 449
1, 7all
180
1,35:!
112
1, ;)93
34.1 7, 170
51
32
371
31 10, 397 1, 927
366
67 165 75
836 572 39
2-13
3, 629 56
212 461
i Inclusive of 588persons (304 Chinese and 284 Japanese) in the military and naval service of the United States (including civilian employees, etc.} stationed abroad, not credited to any state or territory.
2 Inclusive of 31,663 persons (19,803 Chinese and 12,360 Japanese) specially enumerated in 1890 in Alaska, Hawaii, and Indian Territory.
a Exclusive of the population of Hawaii and Indian Territor.\'·· 4 2,288 given in 1890 report as Mongolians, but comprising chiefly Chinese,
with a few Japanese. 5 Includes 1,701 Hawaiian-born lHongoliaus, very nearly all of whom are
1)robably Chinese.
24
TABU<J 17.-INDIAN POPUiiATION, BY STATES AND TERRITORIES: 1880 TO 1900.
[Prior to the census of 1890 no account was .taken in the Feder.al enumerati9u of Indians not taxed tJ:a~ .is, of Indians living i?- tribal relations, but only of Indians found living among the general population and, therefore, liable to taxation. For the number of CIVillzed (or taxable) Indians returned at the censuses of 1860 and 1870, see census report on population for 1890, part I, page 401. . .
No report for Indian Territory was made at the census of 1880. Oklahoma was orgamzed as a territory May 2, 1890.]
l:\llUNS T.\XIW. INDIANS NOT 'l'AXED. ALL INDIANS.
STATES AND TE!tRlTORIES. l-----~----·---c-------11-------,--·----- ----------·--.-·----·
1900 1890 1880 moo 1890 1!)00 1890 _____ , _______ ------- -------The United States ______________________________ _
New Hampshire--------------------------------------New Jersey-------------------------------------------New Mexico ________________________ -···---------------New York ------------------ _________________________ _
North Carolina---------------------------------------
Virginia ------------------------ __________ ..... _ .. __ ---· _ ..
Washington -----------------
1, 107
382
2,130
102 598
798
587
6,354 7,414
2,203
130
597 3,322
3,551
22
63
JO, 207
546 5,687
2,276 42
6,018 4, 9iil
1, 639
35
121 9, 293
108
470 1, 151
5 354
7,508 12
6, 715 1, 686
60
736
71 627
559
44 424
5,ti24
1,888
2, 036
127
860 '..!,893
3,599
16 84
8,554 726
1, 1114
194
193
10
1, 258
983
180
173 782
14.6
704 608
34 :149
3,li55
9
3,833
43
466
815
51,39il 51, 279
397
946
50 ---------------- ----------------848
625
15 ---------------- ------------ ·---8G9
7,'.2-19
2,:mo
1,857
113
1,663
235 2,803
9,772
819
1,230
1,fi94
184
1,768
10, 746
1,665
2,937 4, 711
4,692
5, 927
4
8,208
10, 346
3,538
1,557
6,490
5,318 2
7, 980
13 13, 167 3,'i13
BS
77 ---------------- ----------------131
795
352
992
807
10, 932
1,472
19,072
4
2,8'18
11 ---------------- ----------------
85 1---- ""·----·· ----- ----------------4,405
29 3,161
140
' 2,531
1, 657
'*Specially enumerated in 1890.
7,526
6, 095
1, 801
12(itl, 760
177 629, 536
26,4.80 ()6
15, 377
1,437,
153
9
22 358
19
4,226
16
243
52,500
382 2, 130
102 593
7!18
3 ii87
6,354 9,182
2,'.!.03
IBO 11,343 3,:l22
5,216
22 (i:i
13, 144
5,257
f>,687
6,968 42
11, 945 4,951
l,6:lll
35 121
20, 225
108
470
2,623
5 354
10, o:rn 12
8,372
1, 686
5 27a, ll07
1,Hi~
fi2i'>,3ii4.
29, 981
2•i0 16,6'..!·i
1,092 228
4
25 171
68
4,22B
98 343
iil,279
457 1,682
71 628
55!!
44 428
5,62fi
10,090
2,03!l 121\
11,20(i
6,431
5, 156
rn 84
15,0·14
6,04'1 1,516
8,174
206
13, 177
4,971
1,081
180
17'd rn, 85•J
14n
708
a,451i 311
3'1\l
11,181 9
9,930
1, 8411
1 Inclusive of 28 Indians in the military and naval service of the United States (including civilian employees, etc.) stationed abro11d, not credited to any state or territory.
2 Inclusive of 25,354 Indians specially enumerated in 1890 in Alaska. 3 lnelusiye of 32,996 Indiam: specially enumerated in 1880 in Alaska.
5 Inclusive of 214,801 Indians specially enumemted in 1890. 0 Includes persons of mixed parentage (descendants of native Indio.us and
TABrn 18.-NATIVE AND FOREIGN WHI'rE POPUh . .\.TION, BY STATES AND TERRITORIES: 1880 TO moo. [For a presentation of the native and foreign white population at the censuses of 1850 to 1870, inclusive, see census report on population for 18i0, pages 606-615.
No statement is given in the census reports prior to 1890 of the native white population of native and foreign parentage. '.!.'he designation" native white-native parents" comprehends all native white persons having either both parents native born, one parent mttive born and one
parent unknown, or both parents unknown, while the designation "11ative white-foreign parents" comprehends all il<ltive white riersom: having eithe1· one or both parents foreigu liorn.
No census of Hawaii was taken by the Hawaiian Government in 1880. No report for Indian Territory was made at the census of 1880. Oklahoma was organized as a territory May:.!, 1890.]
~~~=~~::::=::::::::::::::::::::::::! N ebras.k:a --------------------- __ . Nevada------------------------ --------i New Hampshire-----------------------' New Jersey--------·--------------------] New Mexico --------------------------- 1
New York _____________________________ ! North Carolina ________________________ !
i North Dakota -------------------------i Ohio -------~------------------ _________ I Oklahoma _____________________________ _[
~:~~i~;l;~~~~==========================I Rhode Island ____________________ ------! South Citrolina ------------------------i South Dakota __________ -----------------! 'renuessee --------------- --------------'
Washington ------------------;---------West Virginia ----------------:-------Wisconsin --------------------- __ ------Wyoming---------- ________ ., ___________ _
986, 814
21, 709
70, 508
930, 394
1,086, 222
438,571
655, 028
140,248
172, 012
278,076
1,169,273
54, 141
132, 605
3, 770, 238
2,316, 641
297,S9·1
1, 912,885
1,289, 742
1,812, 176
677, 759
599, 291.
859, 280
1, 929, 650
1,858,367
1,232,101
633,575
2, 729,068
163, 910
879,409
26, 824
322, 830
1, 382, 2()7
166, 9:46
5, 267, 858 1, 259, 209
199, 122
3, 602, 304
351, 920
340, 721
5, 159, 121
285, 278
552, 436
292, 385
1, 522, 600
2,249, 088
219, 661
298, 077
1, 17B, 787
394, 179
892,854
1,542,20()
72,4!i9
819, 11'1
4,298
38, 271
804, 658
818, 280
322, 028
550, 283
126, 970
136, 178
206, 771
966, 465
46,416
66, 653
2, 927,497
2, 000, 733
110, 254
1,577, 158
1,228, 989
1, 531, 222
509, 555
580,568
732, 706
1,5()1,870
1,531,283
829,351
537, 127
2,294, 176
87,360
844,852
'27,2'27
303,644
1, 068, 596
132, 058
4,358,263
1,051, 720
101, 059
3, 126, 252
59,591
254, 160
'i, 304, 669
231, 832
455,865
237, 167
1, 316, 738
] I 59,1, 466
1&3, 792
287, 394
1, 001, 933
254, 635
711, 225
1,161, 839
44,894
652, 664
(4)
20, 809
581, 356
549, 529
151, 978
·181, 060
110, 720
101, 026
134, 902
806, 573
22,414
2,448, 172
1,794, 764
1,353,046
842,211
1,317, 725
402, 177
588,193
642, 165
1,321,841!
1,228,127
509,373
470,403
1,811,467
25,898
352,413
33,350
299,995
870,697
100, 773
3, 807,317
863,550
(5)
2, 723,582
1'12, 143
3, 609, 953
196, 108
383, 651
(6)
1, 122,236
l, 083, 656
98, 958
290, 281
866, 248
54, 896
574, 309
904, 300
14,509
I Inclusive of 84,209 white persons (69,510 native white, 48,643 native whitenative parents, and 20,867 native white-foreign parents, and 14,699 foreign white) in the military and naval service of the United States (including civilian employees, etc.) stationed abroad, not credited to any state or territory.
2 Inclu,sive of 182 294 white persons specially enumerated in 1890 in Alaska (4,298), Hawaii (60,62S), and Indian Territory (110,254), and on Indian reserva-
14, 338
8, 798
22, 395
14,186
316,505
90,475
237,396
13, 729
19, 520
19, 257
12,021
12, 7'19 21, 8f10
964, 635
141,-861
4, 786
305, 782
126, 577
50, lBS iil,853
92, 935
93, 14.11
81JO, 114
5-10, 196
504-, Y3n
1, 625 !I
2rn, 775
62, a1a I 177, 117 i
8, 581
87, 961
4-30, 050
13, 261
1,889, 523
4,394
112,590
457, 900
15,604
53,861
982,54.3
133, 772
5,371
88,329
17,586
177,581
52,804
44,69,!
19,068
102,125
22,379
515, 705
16,582
1'1, 604
17,463
14,094
293,553
82,506
183, 155
rn,o96
18,517
18, 178
11,892 14,212
15,464
840, 975
146,003
323, 932
l<J.7,630
59, 240
4-8,840
78,695
93, 787
653, 503
541, 601
467,057
7,724
234,282
40,330
202,24.4
11,894
72,196
327, 985
10,860
1,565,692
3,662
' 81, 348
458,553'
2,709
47,82'2
843, 589
106,027
6,143
90, 843
19,899
151,469
52, 133
·H,024
18, 189
86, 194
18,852
518, 989
14,430
9, 521
(4) 1'1, 31)1
10, 175
217, li52
39, 148
129, 709
9,440
16, 980
7, 703
10,333
6, 599
582, 979
144, 034
261,554
109, 944. 59,454
52, 777
58, 659
82, 528
4.41, 938
386,433
267,511
8,995
211,359
9, •187
97,351
20,206
46,234
221,320
7,948
1,208, 705
3,692
(5)
394,338
20, 932
587, 063
73,831
7,<154
(6)
16, 595
113, 581
43, 465
4.0, 937
14, 610
12,308
18, 228
405, 318
4, 928
956, 658
17,494
44,830
897, 668
644,428
311, BBD 372, 783
,, 118, 020
134, 073 254, 032
1, 144,360
37, 918
89, 851
2, 271, 765
1, 952, 194
287, 647
1, 261,068
1,013, 655 J, fj73, 413
fi69, 962
493, 082
680,M9
1, 032, 261! 1, 026, 71<!
425, 780
614, 067
2, 204, 874
92, 937
553, 5211
15, 111
242, 614
825, 973
149, 029
2,851, 513
1,250, 811
65, 811
2,651, 440
313, 905
256, 12ii
3, 729, 093
144, 986
540, 766
136,191
1,481,636
1,959, 7()2
104,026
225,381
1, 141,213
265,068
843, 981
585, 903
47, 982
796,421
4,298
24, 2•14
780,,950
497, 890
242,214
357, 235
109, 355
107,309
lHO, 998
946, 782
34,436
45,499
1, 882, 693
1, 697, 998
110,254
1, 063, 971
992, 392
1,406, 918
413, 090
506, 703
576,285
955,430
917, 693
311, 200
520,354
1,856,477
56,401
594,.J32
14,821
25:-3,629
696, 718
119,519
2,520,810
1,044,483
37, 712
2,33c!,ii17
55,028
204, 193
3,238,089
137,550
445,195
127, 952
1,283,481
1,408,880
68,478
225,245
976, 758
185,878
670,214
435,004
30,374
30, 156
4, '215
25, 678
32, 726 441, 794
127, 236
282, 245
22, 219
37, 939
24, 044
24,913
16, 223
14, 027
23, 708
320, H!JO
79,SH
19:~. 048
17, Hlil
28, 86\)
15, 7i3
19, usa 11, 980
·:12, 754 21, 154
l; 498, 473 1, 04A, 804.
364, 4·17 302, 73ii
10,247
651,817
276,087
138, 763
107, 797
106, 209
110, 2s1 I 897, 386 i
831, 653 .
806, 321
19, 508
524, 194
70,97:3 I
325,885 1
n,ns I
80,216 ;
556,294
17, 917
2,415,845
8,398
133,311
950,864
38,015
513, L87
236,597
124,:mi
96,4tiii
7B,8fi=> 156,421
606, 4~0
613, 5\JO 518, lf1l
16, 77B
437,6!)9
30, 959
21)0,420
12,406
f>O, orn 371, 878
12,iiBll
1, 837, ,15:~
7,237
63, 347
791, 731)
4,563
84., 596 49, 967
1, 430, 028 1, 066, 580
140, 292
11,670
156, 194 I 40, 964
i 289,326
115, 635
72,696
32,574
129,111
48,873
956,303
24,487
94,282
10, 670
109,21ii
33,237
185, 586
85, 314
62, 149
25, 175
68, 757
41,011
726, 835
14, 520
tions, etc. (7,114 \,in certain states and territories. (See footnote (3) to table 15, page 22.)
a Exclusive of the population of Alaska, Hawaii, Indian Territory, arnl Indian reservations.
4 Not stated in report for 1880. 5 Dakota Territory, native white, 81,770; foreign white, 51,377.
The foregoing tables show that the population of the entire area of enumeration in 1900 is composed of 66, 990, 802
white persons, 8,840, 789 persons of negro descent, 119,050 Chinese, 85,986 Japanese, and 266,760 Indians, representing, in the aggregate, 76,303,387 persons. 'The
26
63, 069, 7 5 6 persons reported for the equivalent area in 1890 comprised 55, 166, 184 white persons, 7,488, 788 persons of negro descent, 126, 778 Chinese, 14,399 Japanese) and 273,607 Indians, made up as follows:
l Inclm1es all persons of negro descent. 2 Callerl native whites of native parentage. a Negroes, mulattoes, Hawaiians, Malays, and Portuguese mulattoes from
the Cape Verde islands. ~Given in 1890 report a.s Mongolians, but comprising· chiefly Chinese, with
a few Japanese. s Natives.
From this summary it is seen that persons of negro 1iescent in 1890 numbered 7,488, 788 as against a total in 1900, for the entire area of enumeration, of 8, 840, 789. This is an increase during the decade of 1,352,001, or 18.l per cent. The whites have increased during the same
6 Includes 5,794 Hawaiian born, both parents being foreigners, and 01186 half-castes.
7 Includes 1,!l'28 Americans, 1,3,14 British, 1,034 Germuns, 70 French, 8,60'2 Por· tuguese, 227 Norwegians, 588 Polynesians, and '119 other nationalities.
s Includes 1,701 Hiiwaiilm-born Mongolin.ns, very nearly all of whom are probably Chinese.
o Includes 861 persons not classified by color.
period 11,824,618, or 21.4 per cent. 'l1hese figures, representing the increase in the white and negro population since 1890, are distributed in table 10 by st:i.tes and territories arranged geographicaJly for convenience of comparison.
T.A.BLE 0
19.-INOREASE IN WHITE AND NEGRO POPULATION, BY STATES AND TERRI'J10IUBJS ARRANGED GEOGRAPHIC.A.LL Y: 1890 TO 1900.
~ In~lud~~ ~11 p~rsons of negro rtesecnt. Inclm1rs .JO,ti(J., Jiersons (!H,:!OH white aud 6,394 negro) in ~he military and
. Table 19. shows that persons of negro descent have not mcreased srnee 1890 relatively as fast as the whites the percentages of increase being, as previously stated '21.4 for the whites and 18 1 f ' · or persons of neO'ro descent h th . 0 i, w en e entire area of enumeration in 1900 is con-sidered. If · an exammation is made of the relative in-
STATES AND TERRITORIES.
North Central division-Cont'd. Missouri ----------------------North Dakota ----------------South Dakota ________________ _
124, 512 80. 8 37,289 26. l s7,1G9 on. 7 (i{i,510 I 32,3 33, 716 a9,5 72,878 88.1
lli5, 475 45. {j 02, ooo ao. 7
290, 894 21i. 2
26, 209 609. 8 6,262 10.3
ll,050 1137 876
82,644 2,203
601i,005
lli,Cl:lfi 41l,fiU5
1'18,818 165,071 01,611
132,551 18,217 15,8(i8 57, 739
a, 173
88 18
2,355 ~ 3116
491 !:H
ll IQ,~ !:l2
912 8 81
8277
5li 233
7.4
::i~:g 1129. 7
4.6
1\),1)
6 •) 11. r, 21. ll 22.2 rn. ,1 27.2 ll7, 7
omi.4 lH.7
11. 7
2,2 2.0
a1.n 317. 7
Bli.2 M.8
H44, (I
•15.8 ()6, 0 all. 8 a2.4
50.0
creases of these two elements in th.e South Atlantic an<l South Central divisions, in which nearly nine-tenths of all t~e persons of negro descent are found, the same coml i~ t.1ons are apparent. In the South Atlantic division there has been an increase in the white population since 1890 of 19. 9 per cent as compared with an increase in the negro.
27
JJOpulation of 14. 3 per cent, while in the South Central division the whites have increased during t,J1e same period 29.1 per cent and the negro element HU1 per cent. If the comparison in these two divisions is extended to the several elements of the white population, it is seen that among the foreign whites the1·e has not been as rapid a rate of increase as among persons of negro descent, but that among the native whites, both of native and foreign parentage, the' relative increase during the decade has been much greater. The percentages of increase in each element since 1890 in each of these t\vo divisions are as follows:
SouTI-r ATLANTIC D1v1sroN .--Native whites of native p:i.reutage, 20. 5; native whites of foreign parentage, 20.9; foreign whites, 3.2; persons of negro descent, 14.3.
SouTH CENTRAL Drv1s10N.--Native whites of native parentage, 29.2; native whites of foreign parentage, 89. 5; foreign whites, 11 ; persons of negro descent, 19.9.
The combined population of these two divisions in 1900
represents a total of 24, 523, 527 persons, of whom the
native whites of native parentage constitute 14,862,032,
or 60.6 per cent, and persons of negro descent, 7,922,969,
or 32. 3 per cent, leaving only 1, 738, 526, or 7.1 per cent, for the remaining elements of the population, as shown by the following summary:
---
SOUTH .A'rL.ANTIO SOUTH CENTRAJ, TWO DlVJSIONS DIVISION. DIVISION. COMBINED.
GENERAL NATIVITY AND COLOR.
Number. Per Number. Per Number. Per cent. cent. cent.
Total population __ 10, 1143, 480 100.0 14,080, 047 100.0 24,523,527 100.0 =-.-::::.:.:::==: -- ---- ==---==-==== --
--l Principally Indialls, with a few Chinese and Japanese.
The increase in· persons of negro descent should be compared more properly, therefore, with that for native whites of native parentage, and this is done for the states and territories comprising these two divisions in table 20.
TA13LE 20.-INCREASE IN NA'l'IVE WHl'fiD PE:RSONS OF NATIVE PARENTAGE AND IN PERSONS OH1 NEGRO DESCENT, FOR THE SOUTH ATLANTIC AND SOU'fH OENTRAii DIVISIONS, BY STATES AND 'rERRITOIUES: 1890 TO 1900.
ST.A.'J.'I~S AND TERitlTOitIES.
The United Stat~s------------------------------
South Atlantic division-----------------------------
Delaware----------------------------------------Maryland----------------------------------------Dii>trict of Columbia _____________________________
~:f !i:~~l~~f fi~=================================== South Carolin11 ----------------------------------Georgia------------------------------------------Florida ------------------------------------------
South Central division ______ ------------------------
As shown by table 20, there has been an increase in native white persons of native parentage since 1890, for the entire area of enumeration in 1900, of 18. 9 per cent as against an increase of 18.1 per cent for persons of negro descent. In the South Atlantic division as a whole, native white persons of native parentage have increased during the past ten years 20. 5 per cent and persons of negro descent 14. 3 per cent. The latter element has increased at a more rapid rate than the first named element in West Virginia and ],lorida and at substantially the same rate in Delaware, but in the remainder of this. division the element of
native parentage shows the larger percentager:.; of increa1:1e. In West Virginia there has been an increase since 18\JO of 33.1 per cent in the negro element as against an incr.ease of 25. 9 per cent in the native whites of native parentage, while in Florida the percentages of increase are 38. 8 for the former and 33 for the latter. In Delaware and Georgia. the two elements have increased at very nearly the same rate, but in the remaining states and in the District of Columbia the percentages of increase are largely in favor of the white element of native parentage.
In the South Central division the native white persons
28
f . nt'10-e have increased 29. 2 per cent and per-o uat1ve pnre 'b . . . . .. f er. descent 19. 9 per cent, when the d1v1s10n is
soni-; o 11e0 ro . M. · · · .1 d . 'ts enti·rety but m Alabama, 1 iss1ss1pp1,
l'OUSl< ere Ill 1 ' •
( ..... lkl· h and Arkansas the rates of mcrease for the .l oma, . I ent oi·e 811· crhtly larirer than those for the native negro e em ,. o .__. .
wi1itcs of native pa,rent~i.ge, or 21. 9 as agamst 20.1 . for "'l 1 . 'V2 ') 0 8 aO'fLinst 18 for Mississippi, 18. 7 as agamst .t~ a Jama, "' . "" ,., 't:>' • . • f Okl 14. n for Arkansas, and .533.4 as agamst 470. 4 or a-
h , 'J~he native white element of native parentage has on1.t. . • h · .· -.1 -· e 18(10 1·elatively three times as fast as t e uu.·n~aRe( HlllC ~ .1 ' • •
l t l·n I:;-entucky more than twice as fast m
Louisiana, and not quite one and one-half times as fat1t in
Texas. . As a result of the changes which have t~1ken place smce
1890 in the relative growth in these two principn.l elemo11t1s of the population, persons of rwgro descm~t C(~nstitnt,o a. slightly less percentage of the tot,:il popn1at10u 1~1 1 HOO :ti'!
compared with 1890, as indicated by table 21, wlnch HlwwH the percentao·e of whites a.ncl m'groci;i of tlrn tota.l popnln.-
0 ·1 • l . tion in the several states and territories arranget 111 t ion·
geographical order.
1wgro e mnen _.... ' ·- . F WHITE AND COLORED OF TOTAL POPULATION, BY STATIDS AND TTCHRl'l'OlHJiJ8 T •>1 PEPOENTAGE 0 1
ABLE ..., .- \, ARRANGED GEOGRAPHICALLY: 1890 AND moo. =======T,'=====rr======r===:.==--~==-;cco-,;--::;;::·.,·c·=:::;;-.·;.,.-
=-· .. =---=='''-···- j moo I t~no
1----:--1-9-00--;---111--,--1-89-0--r---11 STATES A.ND 1'BHRITOltIES. --···- N"·.gro,1 II \"l1it"'. s·uTE"' .\::-ill TElUllTUitIF..S. \\'hite. Colored. <:, ,, ., Co1orc1\. Ne~rn.1
White. Colored. Negro.1 White. Colored. Negro.l
The United Stutes __ 287.8 12.2 --11-.-6 -8-7.-5 --12-.5---11-.9 11-N-i-~-~~-g-{;-;~-~{-~l-d-iv-i-si-on---· I ·- ----- I ---'=-- Missouri _______________ , 94.8 ~:5 f>.'.l[
North Atlantic division__ 98.1 _i. 9 _1. 8 98.~ _1. 6 ~ North Dakota ____ .______ 97. 7 till .. 11
,
Maine----------------New Hampshire-----
0.2 0.2 0.3
- South Dakota__________ 9-1. 8 f>. 2 Nebraska-------------- 99.1 o
3. ·• 9
7• ~:· ~
Kansas----------------- 96. 3 • · ,,
9'1,11 !lfi.fi Uil.l 08. /'i !lO. •t
ii. fl ·1.li r ... \\ I.Ii a.u
[>,(j o. :.! \\.'!, O.H :I.ii
Vermont ____ ---------Mas~achusetts -------
99. 7 99.8 99. 7 98. 7 97. 8 98.2 98.5 96.2 97.5
0.3 0.2 0.3 1.3 2.2 1.8 1.5 3.8 2.5
0.2 0.2 0.2 1.2 2.1 1. 7 1.4 3. 7 2.5
99. 7 99. 8 99. 7 98. 9 97.8 98.3 98.7 96. 7 97.9
0.3 0.2 0.3 1.1 2,2 1. 7 1.3 3.3 2.1
1. O South Central division ----2. l
69. 7 30. !l 2\).8 lilt 1 :l.1. \) 81.:1
H·l '.!·(,( •l·l.K r11. n rin.n :..!l.8 rn.:t
Rhode Island _______ _ Connecticut------New York----------New Jer~ey ----------Pennsylvania _______ _
South Atlantic division __
Delaware------------Marvland ___________ _ J:?!>'t~il'~ of Columbia_ V~r-,.:lll)!1-;-~---------\\f'l't \ irgmrn _______ _ North Carolina _____ _ South Carolina ------1 Georgia ___ .., _________ _ Florida --------------!
: I11cl\lllf!s all peri;ons of negro descent. ~ Tnclu1les per~onH in the military and naval service of the United States (including civilian ~m:ployees, etc.) stn.tioned abroad, not credited to any A ta to or territory,
Of the entire population returnet1 in 1900, the white PlPment constitutes 87. 8 per cent and the colored element I 2. 2 per cent, the negro element by itself constituting 11. 6 per cent. Ten years ago the negro element represented a Hlightly larger proportion of the population, or 11. 9 per cent. In the two divisions comprisiug the southern· states an.1 territories, considc~red as a whole, persons of negro dc>s<'ent. now eonstitnte a somewhat less proportion of the total population than in l 890, bnt in certain of these states and territori(•s in which this element has increased during the dl:'e:tdL' at a more rapid rate than the whites, they constitute a slightly larger percentage of the population in 1900 than they did in 1890, namely, West Virginia and Florida, in the South Atlantic division, and ~!\..]abama, l\IississippL Oklahoma, and Arkansas, in the South Central division.
In South Carolina and Mississippi the negro element predominates, there' being in 1900 in South Carolina 782, 321
persons of negro descent nnd 557, 807 white perH011s, i1!lll
in Mississippi 907,630 of tho former ancl 041,200 of the latter element. Of the entire population of South Carolina, the negro element constitutes 58.4 per cent in moo as against 59. 9 per cent in 1890, whilo of that of Mh-11-1iHsippi the same element constitutes 58. 5 per ccmt al4 ~1gah.i1:1t
57.6 per cent in 1890. 'Ten yc~ars n,go the n<~grom~ w<n·u in the majority in Louisiana, when they repr(~Aentml practically half of the population, 1mt n.t. tlw p1·rn:rnnt cmrnua they number 650, 804 and constitute only 47 .1 vor cent of the population of that state. There are now 72U,G12 whit<.~ persons in Louisiana anc1 they constitnte 52. 8 per cent of the whole population as against 49. H per cent in 1800.
'rable 22 shows the relative proportions of negroes to whites, that is, the number of negroeH to ea.ell 100~000 whites, in the several states and territorieR arranged geographicnlly, according to the retur11H of tho hist two censuses.
29
T:rnLE 22.-REiiATIVE PROPORTIONS OF NEGROES TO WHITES, BY STATES AND TERRITORIES ARRANGED GEOGRAPHIOALI..i Y: 1890 AND 1900.
STATICH AND TEF:RITORIES.
NUMBER OF NEGROES 1 TO EAOH 100,000 WRITES.
1900 1890
S'l'A'l'ES AND TE!UUTOitIES,
NUMBER OF NEGROES i TO E.A.ClI 100,000 WlII'fES.
!-------------~---
1900 lStlO
The United States ____ :.______________________ 213, 197 13, 575 North. Cent~al division-Continued. =====,1======11 M1ssour1 ______ ----------- _____________ ---~------ 5,475 5,940
North Atlantic division__________________________ 1, 8GG 1
, 575 North Dakota _________________________________ _ South Dakotn. ----------------------------------
1 Includes all persons of negro descent. 2 Includes persons in the military and naval service of the United States
For the entire area of enumeration in 1900 there are
1 13,197 negroes to each 100,000 whites as compared with 13,575 in 1890. The North Atlantic division is the only one of the five grand divisions which shows a larger proportion of negroes relatively to the whites in 1900 as compared with ten years ago, but in this division the rela-' tive proportion is small at each census, or 1,866 in 1900
and 1, 576 in 1890. In the South Atlantic division there are 5 5, 607 negroes
to each 100,000 whites in 1900 as against 58,344 in 1800,
and in the South Central division 42, 726 in 1900 as against 46,017 in 1890.
The largest proportions of negroes to whites in 1900
are found in Mississippi and South Carolina, or a little m?re than 140,000 negroes to each 100, 000 whites in each case. The relative proportion has fallen in South Car-
(incluSting civilian employees, etc.) stationed abroad, not credited to any state or territory.
olina from 149,117 in 1890 to 140,249 in 1900, but in Mississippi it has increased in ten years from 136,287
to 141,552, this being the largest proportion showu by any state or territory in 1900. In J..iouisiana there were ten years ago 100,143 negroes to e[i.Ch 100,000 whites, but the census of 1900 shows a decrease in the relative proportion to 89, 199. Alabama lrns .~ncreased its relative proportion in ten years from 81,381 to ·82,636, and there has been a similar increase from 73,875 to 77,600
in Florida, from 37,755 to 38,838 in Arkansas, from 4, 772 to 5, 124 in Oklahoma, and from 4,478 to 4, 753
in West Virginia. The proportion of the total population represented by
each element of the white population at the last two census periods is presented in detail by states and territories arranged geographically in table 23.
30
TABLE 23.-PEROENTAGE OF NATIVE AND FOREIGN WHITE OF TOTAL POPULATION, BY STATES AND TERRITORIES ARRANGED GEOGRAPHICALLY: 1890 AND moo.
ST..\.TF~<; AND TERRITORIES.
The United States ----------------------------
North Atlantic division ----------------------------
' · onec a roa • not credited to a.ny state or terrlt<iry.
Of the entire population enumerated in 1900 native white persons of native parentage cons~itute 53. 8 per cent, native white persons of foreign parentage 20. 6 per cent, and foreign white persons 13.4. per cent, representing an aggregate for the white population as a whole of 87. 8 per cent. .As compared with similar results for 1890 these figures show relatively a loss of nine-tenths of 1 per cent for native whites of native parentage, a gain of 2. 3 per cent for native whites of foreign parentage, and a loss of 1.1 per cent for foreign whites, making a net gain for the entire white population of three-tenths of 1 per cent. . The combined white element of foreign birth or parentage represents a little more than one-third of the population for the entire area of enumeration in 1900, but in the North .Atlantic division these t~o elements represent somewhat more than one-half of the total population of the division, or 28. 4 per cent for native white persqns of foreign parentage and 22. 5 per cent for foreign white persons, representing togethet 50. 9 per cent. In the North Central and \i\-'r estern divisions these same two elements, when combined, constitute very' nearly as large a proportion of the total population, or 44.2 per cent for the first named and 45. 3 per cent for the last na.med division. In the South .Atlantic division the proportion of the total populat~on represented by these two elements of the white population is very small, or only 5. 7 per cent, and this is also the case in the South Central division, where they constitute only 7. 5 per cent.
':Phis white element of foreign birth or parentage is very la.rge in certain of the states iu the northern and western sections of the country. It constitutes 77.1 per cent of the total population of North Dakota in 1900, 7 4. 9 per cent of that of Minnesota, and 71. 2 per cent of that of Wisconsin, while in Hhode Island it represents 64 per cent, in Massachusetts 61.9 per cent, in South Dakota and in Utah, 60.9 pe1· cent, and in New York, 59.3
per cent, or from nearly three-fifths to more than threefourths of the respective populations of these states.
In Hawaii the white population includes, for the purposes of the census, H.awaiians and part Hawaiians, Caucasians, and South Sea Islanders, and these combine<;l represent 43.4 per cent of the total population in 1900, or a little more than the proportions shown for Mississippi and South. Carolina.
OHINESE, JAPANESE, AND INDIAN POPUI.1ATION.
The i·eturns of the Twelfth Census show a total of 119,050 Chinese, including 3, 116 in .Alaska, 25, 767 in Hawaii, and 304 at military and naval stations abroad. In the United States proper there are, therefore, 89,863
Chinese as against 107,488 in 1890, including in thelatter number 13 specially enumerated in Indian 'rerritory ten years ago. .
Of the 89,863 Chinese in the United States proper,
31
67, 729, or 75.4: per cent, are contained in the Western \iivision of states and territories as against 96, 844, or 90.1
per cent, in 1890. This is a loss since 1890 of 29, 115
Chinese, or 30. l per cent, in the Western division, the number in California alone having been reduced from 72,472 in 1890 to 45,753 in 1900. There has, howev~r, been a slight gain since 1890 in the number oi Chinese in Arizona, Oregon, and Washington.
rrhe states and territories outside of the western clivi~ion show as a whole a gain since 1890 of 11,490 Chinese, making a net loss for the United States proper of 17,625, or 16.4 per cent.
There has been an increase in Chinese since 1890 in all of the geographical divisions, except the Wes tern, as shown by the following summary :
GEOGRAPmOAI, DIVISIONS.
Total --------------------------------______ _
North Atlantic\ division _________________________ _ South Atlantic diviidon --------------------------Nort.h Central division ____ .:. ______________ --------South Central division __________________________ _ Western division---------------------------------
NUMBER OF OHINEHE.
1900 1890
89,863
14, 693 1, 791 3, 668 1, 982
67, 729
!07,488
6,177 669
2,351 1,447
96,844
'I1here has been a large increase since 1890 in the number of Japanese in the United States, the figures of the present census showing a total for the United States proper of 24,326 as against only 2,039 in 1890. rrhere is also a large Japanese element in Hawaii, numbering 61, 111 in 1900 as against 12, 360 in 1890, and besides thet-w the census shows 265 Japanese in Alaska and 284 Japanese enumerated at military and naval stations abroad, making a total of 85, 986 Japanese for the entire area of enumera,tion in 1900.
The Japanese in the United States proper are concentrated in the Western division of . states and territories, as shown by the following summary :
GIWG UAl' HIOAL DIVISIONS.
Total---------------------------------------
North Atlantic clivision-------------------------South Atlantic division-------------------------North Central division---··----------------------South Central division.-------------------------Western division---------------------------------
NUMBEil. OF JAPANESE.
1900 1890
24,326
535 29
349 37
23,376
2,039
24.7 55
117 61
1,559
Of the 23,376 Japanese in the Western division in 1900,
10, 151 are in California, 5,617 in Washington, 2,501 in Oregon, 2,441 in Montana, and 1,291 in Idaho, leaving only 1,375 for the remaining states and territories in this division.
The whole number of Indians, taxed and not taxed, in
the G 11ited States in 1900, including those enuJ.llerated in Alaska and at military and naval st:itions abroad, is :.!GG,760, of whom 137,242 are taxed and 129,518 are· not taxed. For the same area in 1890 there were returned 273,607 Indians, comprising 84, HiO Indians taxed and 1S9,447 Indians not taxed.
The native Indian tribes of Alaska number 29, 536 in I noo as aga.inst a return of 25, 354 in 1890, showing a gain during the ten years of 4, 182, or 16. 5 per cent. In the UnitPd Sta.tea proper the Indians number 237,196 ais
compared with a total in 1890 of 248,253, representing a lo!'<s during the decade of 11,057, or 4.5 percent. The 1lif.;tribution of the Indians in the United States proper in 1890 and 1900 is shown by g<:Jographical divisions in the following summary :
32
GEOGHAPRICAI, DIYISIONS.
Total -------------------------- -- -----------
North Atlantic division----·---------------------South Atlantic division--------------------------North Central division __________________________ _ South Central division---------------------------Western division ________________________________ _
NUl\:rnEit OF INDIANS.
1900 1890
237,l\JO
8,559 tl,li85
57,!16(i tiR, ltH UCi,f>2~
With the exception of the South Atlantic diviAiou tho above summary shows a loss in the number of IndittnH iu each geographical division since 1890. ~rhe :.tpp:ncnt gain in the South Atlantic division is due to tho inclusion· al::! Indians in 1900 of the Oroata.us in North Carolina, who were largely ennmer~tecl in 1890 as whites.