Page 1
ADVERTIMENT. La consulta d’aquesta tesi queda condicionada a l’acceptació de les següents condicions d'ús: La difusió d’aquesta tesi per mitjà del servei TDX (www.tesisenxarxa.net) ha estat autoritzada pels titulars dels drets de propietat intel·lectual únicament per a usos privats emmarcats en activitats d’investigació i docència. No s’autoritza la seva reproducció amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva difusió i posada a disposició des d’un lloc aliè al servei TDX. No s’autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant al resum de presentació de la tesi com als seus continguts. En la utilització o cita de parts de la tesi és obligat indicar el nom de la persona autora.
ADVERTENCIA. La consulta de esta tesis queda condicionada a la aceptación de las siguientes condiciones de uso: La difusión de esta tesis por medio del servicio TDR (www.tesisenred.net) ha sido autorizada por los titulares de los derechos de propiedad intelectual únicamente para usos privados enmarcados en actividades de investigación y docencia. No se autoriza su reproducción con finalidades de lucro ni su difusión y puesta a disposición desde un sitio ajeno al servicio TDR. No se autoriza la presentación de su contenido en una ventana o marco ajeno a TDR (framing). Esta reserva de derechos afecta tanto al resumen de presentación de la tesis como a sus contenidos. En la utilización o cita de partes de la tesis es obligado indicar el nombre de la persona autora.
WARNING. On having consulted this thesis you’re accepting the following use conditions: Spreading this thesis by the TDX (www.tesisenxarxa.net) service has been authorized by the titular of the intellectual property rights only for private uses placed in investigation and teaching activities. Reproduction with lucrative aims is not authorized neither its spreading and availability from a site foreign to the TDX service. Introducing its content in a window or frame foreign to the TDX service is not authorized (framing). This rights affect to the presentation summary of the thesis as well as to its contents. In the using or citation of parts of the thesis it’s obliged to indicate the name of the author
Page 55
H/V AALJ
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0.01 0.1 1 10
Periodo T (s)
Raz
ón e
spec
tral
(H/V
)
H/V NCHI
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0.01 0.1 1 10
Periodo T (s)
Razó
n es
pect
ral H
/VH/V ESTE
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0.01 0.1 1 10
Periodo T (s)
Raz
ón e
spec
tral
H/V
H/V NJIN
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0.01 0.1 1 10Periodo T (s)
Raz
ón e
spec
tral H
/V
H/V SFRA
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0.01 0.1 1 10
Periodo T (s)
Raz
ón e
spec
tral
H/V
H/V NGRA
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0.01 0.1 1 10
Periodo T (s)
Raz
ón e
spec
tral
H/V
Page 73
Moment magnitude vs. hypocentral distance, shalow crustal, soil types
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
8
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
Mw
soft hard rock
Moment magnitude vs. hypocentral distance, shalow crustal
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
8
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
Mw
Central America
Page 74
Geometrical mean PGA vs. hypocentral distance, shalow crustal, magnitude ranges
0.1
1
10
100
1000
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PG
A c(
cm/s
s)
4 - 4.9 5 - 5.9 6 - more
Geometrical mean PGA vs. hypocentral distance, shalow crustal, soil types
0.1
1
10
100
1000
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PG
A c(
cm/s
s)
soft hard rock
Page 76
Caso 1: 3 4 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 b7 b8 SD -0.22828 0.65261 -0.01377 -1.09463 -0.00018 3.26359 0.16439 0.1123 0.42242928
Caso 2: 2 4 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 SD 0.18508 0.50472 -1.11803 3.59823 0.1646 0.11278 0.42157614
Caso 3: 3 2 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 b7 b8 SD 1.45279 0.18577 0.02808 -1.37805 0.00147 5.63257 0.14036 0.11862 0.46326974
Caso 4: 2 2 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 SD 0.38662 0.48772 -1.15454 -3.57197 0.13484 0.10846 0.45912871
Caso 5: 3 1 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 b7 b8 SD -0.18751 0.55613 -0.0058 -0.92783 -0.00075 2.30174 0.21954 0.11735 0.4086
Caso 6: 2 1 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 SD 0.12602 0.49081 -1.03591 4.22442 0.22075 0.11742 0.4078
Page 77
Comparison for crustal, rock, Mw = 6
1
10
100
1000
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PG
A (c
m/s
/s)
Case 1Case 2Case 3Case 4Case 5Case 6
Page 78
Comparison for crustal, rock
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
0.1 1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PG
A (c
m/s
/s)
Case 6 M6Case 5 M6Case 6 M5Case 5 M5 Case 6 M7Case 5 M7
Comparison for crustal, rock, Mw = 5
0.1
1
10
100
1000
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PG
A (c
m/s
/s)
Case 5Case 6Case 1
Comparison for crustal, rock, Mw = 7
1
10
100
1000
10000
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PG
A (c
m/s
/s)
Case 5Case 6Case 1
Page 79
Comparison different inversion methods, rock
1
10
100
1000
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PG
A (c
m/s
/s)
Douglas M6 SigmaPlot M6 Douglas M7SigmaPlot M7 Douglas M5 SigmaPlot M5
Page 81
Cru
stal
, roc
k, M
w =
6, c
ase
6
110100
1000
110
100
1000
Hypo
cent
ral d
ista
nce
(km
)
GM PGA (cm/s/s)ro
ckro
ck +
SD
rock
- S
D
Cru
stal
, har
d, M
w =
6, c
ase
6
110100
1000
110
100
1000
Hypo
cent
ral d
ista
nce
(km
)
GM PGA (cm/s/s)
hard
hard
+ S
Dha
rd -
SD
Cru
stal
, sof
t, M
w =
6, c
ase
6
110100
1000
1000
0
110
100
1000
Hyp
ocen
tral
dis
tanc
e (k
m)
GM PGA (cm/s/s)
soft
soft
+ S
Dso
ft - S
D
Cru
stal
, soi
ls, M
w =
6, c
ase
6
110100
1000
110
100
1000
Hyp
ocen
tral
dis
tanc
e (k
m)
GM PGA (cm/s/s)
rock
hard
soft
Page 82
Comparison crustal, rock, Mw = 6, GM PGA
1
10
100
1000
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PG
A (c
m/s
/s)
this studySchmidt et al, 1997Dahle 1995Zhao 2006Spudich 1999
Log(obs)-Log(pred), crustal
y = -0.2368Ln(x) + 0.8923-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
1 10 100 1000
hypocentral distance (km)
resi
dual
s
Log(obs)-Log(pred), crustal
y = -0.1276x + 0.6376-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3 4 5 6 7 8
magnitude
resi
dual
s
Page 83
±
Crustal, rock, Mw = 6, case 6, PSA 1hz
0.1
1
10
100
1000
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PSA
(cm
/s/s
)
rockrock + SDrock - SD
Crustal, soils, Mw = 6, case 6
1
10
100
1000
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PSA
(cm
/s/s
)
rockhardsoft
Page 84
Log(obs)-Log(pred), crustal, 1Hz PSA
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
1 10 100 1000
hypocentral distance (km)
resi
dual
s
Log(obs)-Log(pred), crustal, 1Hz PSA
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
3 4 5 6 7 8
magnitude
resi
dual
s
Comparison crustal, rock, Mw = 6, GM, PSA 1 Hz
1
10
100
1000
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PSA
(cm
/s/s
)
this studySchmidt et al, 1997Dahle 1995Zhao 2006Spudich 1999
Page 86
Crus
tal,
M=5
, D=1
0 km
0.010.1110100
1000
0.01
0.1
110
peri
od (s
)
GM PSA (cm/s2)ro
ckha
rdso
ft
Cru
stal
, M=5
, D=5
0 km
0.010.1110100
1000
0.01
0.1
110
peri
od (s
)
GM PSA (cm/s2)
rock
hard
soft
Cru
stal
, M=5
, D=1
00 k
m
0.010.1110100
1000
0.01
0.1
110
peri
od (s
)
GM PSA (cm/s2)
rock
hard
soft
Crus
tal,
M=7
, D=1
0 km
0.010.1110100
1000
1000
0 0.01
0.1
110
peri
od (s
)
GM PSA (cm/s2)
rock
hard
soft
Crus
tal,
M=7
, D=5
0 km
0.010.
1110100
1000
0.01
0.1
110
peri
od (s
)
GM PSA (cm/s2)
rock
hard
soft
Cru
stal
, M=7
, D=1
00 k
m
0.010.1110100
1000
0.01
0.1
110
peri
od (s
)
GM PSA (cm/s2)
rock
hard
soft
Crus
tal,
M=6
, D=1
0 km
0.010.1110100
1000
0.01
0.1
110
peri
od (s
)
GM PSA (cm/s2)
rock
hard
soft
Crus
tal,
M=6
, D=5
0 km
0.010.1110100
1000
0.01
0.1
110
peri
od (s
)
GM PSA (cm/s2)
rock
hard
soft
Cru
stal
, M=6
, D=1
00 k
m
0.010.
1110100
1000
0.01
0.1
110
peri
od (s
)
GM PSA (cm/s2)
rock
hard
soft
Page 89
Coef C1 vs. period
-4
-3.5
-3
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0.01 0.1 1 10
period
C1
Coef C2 vs. period
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0.01 0.1 1 10
period
C2
Coef C3 vs. period
-1.16
-1.14
-1.12
-1.1
-1.08
-1.06
-1.04
-1.02
-1
-0.98
0.01 0.1 1 10
period
C3
Coef C4 vs. period
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0.01 0.1 1 10
period
C4
SD vs. period
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.01 0.1 1 10
period
SD
Page 90
Soil coefficients, crustal
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
0.01 0.1 1 10
period (s)
Am
plifi
catio
n
hard soft
Page 92
Crustal, Mw=6, D=50 km, rock
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
0.01 0.1 1 10
period (s)
GM
PSA
(cm
/s2)
this study Schmidt 1997 Dahle 1995 Zhao 2006
Crustal, Mw=6, D=50 km, hard
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
0.01 0.1 1 10
period (s)
GM
PSA
(cm
/s2)
this study Schmidt 1997 Zhao 2006
Crustal, Mw=6, D=50 km, soft
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
0.01 0.1 1 10
period (s)
GM
PSA
(cm
/s2)
this study Schmidt 1997 Dahle 1995 Zhao 2006
Page 93
Crustal, Mw=7, D=10 km, rock
1
10
100
1000
0.01 0.1 1 10
period (s)
GM
PSA
this study CSCR 2002
1
10
100
1000
10000
0.01 0.1 1 10
period (s)
GM
PSA
(cm
/s2)
this study M7 D 10 CSCR 2002 this study M7 D50
Crustal, Mw=7, D=10 km, hard
1
10
100
1000
10000
0.01 0.1 1 10
period (s)
GM
PSA
this study CSCR 2002
Page 95
Moment magnitude vs. hypocentral distance, subduction
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
Mw
Costa Rica
Page 96
Moment magnitude vs. hypocentral distance, subduction
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
Mw
soft hard rock
Geometrical mean PGA vs. hypocentral distance, subduction
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PG
A c
(cm
/ss)
soft hard rock
Page 97
Geometrical mean PGA vs. hypocentral distance, subduction, magnitude ranges
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PG
A c(
cm/s
s)
4 - 4.9 5 - 5.9 6 - more
Page 99
Caso 1: 3 2 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 b7 b8 SD 3.23497 0.63887 -0.02439 -2.85607 0.00744 38.28745 0.14435 -0.02726 0.413
Caso 2: 2 2 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 SD 0.67366 0.38804 -0.88246 12.35314 0.14972 -0.01721 0.418
Caso 3: 3 1 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 b7 b8 SD -1.19277 1.02348 -0.04511 -0.96722 -0.00233 13.53483 0.35693 0.1152 0.351
Caso 4: 2 1 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 SD 1.0597 0.54079 -1.57902 26.73778 0.36179 0.10591 0.352
Caso 5: 13 1 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 SD 0.49807 0.5371 -1.30061 0.35955 0.11626 0.352
Comparison for subduction, rock, Mw = 6
1
10
100
1000
10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PG
A (c
m/s
/s)
Case 2Case 4Caso 5
Page 100
±
Comparison for subduction, rock, Mw = 5
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PG
A (c
m/s
/s)
Case 2Case 4Caso 5
Comparison for subduction, rock, Mw = 7
1
10
100
1000
10000
10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PG
A (c
m/s
/s)
Case 2Case 4Case 5
Page 102
Sub
du, r
ock,
Mw
= 6
, cas
e 5,
PG
A
110100
1000
1000
0
110
100
1000
Hypo
cent
ral d
ista
nce
(km
)
GM PGA (cm/s/s)ro
ckro
ck +
SD
rock
- S
D
Sub
du, h
ard,
Mw
= 6
, cas
e 5,
PG
A
110100
1000
1000
0
110
100
1000
Hypo
cent
ral d
ista
nce
(km
)
GM PGA (cm/s/s)
hard
hard
+ S
Dha
rd -
SD
Sub
du, s
oft,
Mw
= 6
, cas
e 5,
PG
A
110100
1000
1000
0
110
100
1000
Hyp
ocen
tral
dis
tanc
e (k
m)
GM PGA (cm/s/s)
soft
soft
+ S
Dso
ft - S
D
Sub
du, s
oils
, Mw
= 6
, cas
e 5,
PG
A
110100
1000
1000
0
110
100
1000
Hyp
ocen
tral
dis
tanc
e (k
m)
GM PGA (cm/s/s)
rock
hard
soft
Page 103
Log(obs)-Log(pred), subdu
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
10 100 1000
hypocentral distance (km)
resi
dual
s
Log(obs)-Log(pred), subdu
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
3 4 5 6 7 8
magnitude
resi
dual
sComparison subdu crustal, Mw = 6, PGA
1
10
100
1000
10000
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PSA
(cm
/s/s
)
crust-rockcrust-hardcrust-softsubdu-rocksubdu-hardsubdu-soft
Page 104
±
Comparison subdu, rock, Mw = 6, PGA
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PG
A (c
m/s
/s)
this study Schmidt et al, 1997 Dahle 1995 Zhao 2006Garcia 2005 Atkinson 2003 Cepeda 2004
Page 105
±
Subdu, rock, Mw = 6, case 5, PSA 1 Hz
0.1
1
10
100
1000
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PSA
(cm
/s/s
)
rockrock + SDrock - SD
Subdu, soils, Mw = 6, case 5, PSA, 1Hz
1
10
100
1000
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)G
M P
SA (c
m/s
/s)
rockhardsoft
Log(obs)-Log(pred), subdu
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
10 100 1000
hypocentral distance (km)
resi
dual
s
Log(obs)-Log(pred), subdu
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
3 4 5 6 7 8
magnitude
resi
dual
s
Page 106
Comparison subdu crustal, Mw = 6, PSA 1 Hz
1
10
100
1000
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PSA
(cm
/s/s
)
crustal-rockcrustal-hardcrustal-softsubdu-rocksubdu-hardsubdu-soft
Page 107
Comparison subdu, rock, Mw = 6, PSA 1Hz
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
1 10 100 1000Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PSA
(cm
/s/s
)
this study Schmidt et al, 1997 Dahle 1995Zhao 2006 Garcia 2005 Atkinson 2003
Page 108
Sub
du, M
=5, D
=25
km
0.010.1110100
1000
0.01
0.1
110
peri
od (s
)
GM PSA (cm/s2)
rock
hard
soft
Sub
du, M
=7, D
=25
km
0.010.1110100
1000
1000
0 0.01
0.1
110
peri
od (s
)
GM PSA (cm/s2)
rock
hard
soft
Sub
du, M
=6, D
=25
km
0.010.1110100
1000
0.01
0.1
110
peri
od (s
)
GM PSA (cm/s2)
rock
hard
soft
Su
bd
ul,
M=5
, D=5
0 k
m
0.010.1110100
1000
0.01
0.1
110
pe
rio
d (
s)
GM PSA (cm/s2)
rock
hard
soft
Su
bd
u, M
=7, D
=50
km
0.010.
1110100
1000
1000
0 0.01
0.1
110
pe
rio
d (
s)
GM PSA (cm/s2)
rock
hard
soft
Su
bd
u, M
=6, D
=50
km
0.010.1110100
1000
0.01
0.1
110
pe
rio
d (
s)
GM PSA (cm/s2)
rock
hard
soft
Subd
u, M
=5, D
=100
km
0.010.1110100
1000
0.01
0.1
110
peri
od (s
)
GM PSA (cm/s2)
rock
hard
soft
Sub
du, M
=7, D
=100
km
0.010.1110100
1000
1000
0 0.01
0.1
110
peri
od
(s)
GM PSA (cm/s2)
rock
hard
soft
Subd
u, M
=6, D
=100
km
0.010.1110100
1000
0.01
0.1
110
peri
od (s
)
GM PSA (cm/s2)
rock
hard
soft
Page 110
Coef C1 vs. period
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
0.01 0.1 1 10
period
C1
Coef C2 vs. period
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0.01 0.1 1 10
period
C2
Coef C3 vs. period
-1.6
-1.4
-1.2
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.01 0.1 1 10
period
C3
SD vs. period
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.01 0.1 1 10
period
SD
Page 111
Soil coefficients, subdu
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
0.01 0.1 1 10
period (s)
GM
PSA
(cm
/s2)
hard soft
Page 112
Crustal and subduction, D=50 km, rock
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
0.01 0.1 1 10
period (s)
GM
PSA
(cm
/s2)
crustal M6 subdu M6 crustal M5subdu M5 crustal M7 subdu M7
Crustal and subduction, M=6, D=100 km, rock
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
0.01 0.1 1 10period (s)
GM
PS
A (c
m/s
2)
crustal M6 subdu M6 crustal M5crustal M7 subdu M5 crustal M7
Page 113
Subdu, Mw=6, D=50 km, rock
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
0.01 0.1 1 10
period (s)
GM
PSA
(cm
/s2)
this study Schmidt 1997 DahleZhao 2006 Garcia 2005
Subdu, Mw=6, D=50 km, soft
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
0.01 0.1 1 10
period (s)
GM
PSA
(cm
/s2)
this study Schmidt 1997 Dahle 1995 Zhao 2006
Page 114
1
10
100
1000
10000
0.01 0.1 1 10
GM
PSA
(cm
/s2)
period (s)
Subdu Mw=7 D=25 Km, rock
CSCR 2002 this study
1
10
100
1000
10000
0.01 0.1 1 10
GM
PS
A (c
m/s
2)
period (s)
Subdu, Mw=7, D=25 km, soft
this study CSCR 2002
Page 117
Mw vs. hypocentral distance
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
8
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral Distance (Km)
Mag
nitu
d (M
w)
Central America Mexico
Mw vs. hypocentral distance, soil type
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
8
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral Distance (Km)
Mag
nitu
de (M
w)
soft hard rock
Mw vs. hypocentral distance, source
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
8
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral Distance (Km)
Mag
nitu
de (M
w)
crustal other crustal reversesubd inslab subd interface
Page 119
GM PGA vs. hypocentral distance
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral Distance (Km)
GM
PG
A (c
m/s
s)
Central America Mexico
GM PGA vs. hypocentral distance, soil type
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral Distance (Km)
GM
PG
A (c
m/s
s)
soft hard rock
GM PGA vs. hypocentral distance, source
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral Distance (Km)
GM
PG
A (c
m/s
s)
crustal other subd interfacesubd inslab crustal reverse
Page 121
Coeficiente b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 Valor -0.16744 0.54247 -0.00026 0.01054 0.79777 0.00062 Coeficiente b7 b8 b9 b10 b11 b12 SD Valor -0.08744 0.20375 0.12437 -0.03808 0.16331 -0.09812 0.3594
±
±
±
Page 122
Mw
=6, d
epth
=10,
rock
110100
1000
110
100
1000
Hypo
cent
ral d
ista
nce
(km
)
GM PGA (cm/s/s)
crus
tal-o
ther
inte
rface
insl
abcr
usta
l-rev
erse
Mw
=6, d
epth
=40,
roc
k
110100
1000
110
100
1000
Hypo
cent
ral d
ista
nce
(km
)
GM PGA (cm/s/s)
crus
tal-o
ther
inte
rface
insl
abcr
usta
l-rev
erse
Mw
=5, d
epth
=40,
rock
0.1110100
1000
1000
0
110
100
1000
Hypo
cent
ral d
ista
nce
(km
)
GM PGA (cm/s/s)
crus
tal-o
ther
inte
rface
insl
abcr
usta
l-rev
erse
Mw=
7, d
epth
=40,
rock
110100
1000
1000
0
110
100
1000
Hypo
cent
ral d
ista
nce
(km
)
GM PGA (cm/s/s)
crus
tal-o
ther
inte
rface
insl
abcr
usta
l-rev
erse
Page 123
±
Mw=6, depth=40, rock, inslab
1
10
100
1000
10000
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PG
A (c
m/s
/s)
inslab +SD -SD
Mw=5, depth=40, rock, crustal unknown
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PG
A (c
m/s
/s)
crustal-other +SD -SD
Mw=7, depth=40, rock, inslab
1
10
100
1000
10000
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PG
A (c
m/s
/s)
inslab +SD -SD
Page 125
Mw=6, depth=40, soil types
1
10
100
1000
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PG
A (c
m/s
/s)
crustal-rev rock crustal-rev stiff crustal-rev soft
Mw=6, depth=40,soil types
1
10
100
1000
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PG
A (c
m/s
/s)
inslab rock inslab stiff inslab soft
log (obs)-log (pred)
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
1 10 100 1000
hypocentral distance (km)
resi
dual
s
log (obs)- log(pred)
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
4 5 6 7 8 9
Magnitude
resi
dual
s
Page 126
Mw=6, depth=10, rock
1
10
100
1000
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PG
A (c
m/s
/s)
interface CA crustal-reverse CA interface Japan crustal reverse Japa
Mw=6, depth=40, rock
1
10
100
1000
1 10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PG
A (c
m/s
/s)
interface CA crustal-reverse CA interface Japan crustal-reverse Japan
Mw=6, depth=40, rock
1
10
100
1000
10 100 1000
Hypocentral distance (km)
GM
PG
A (c
m/s
/s)
inslab CA inslab Japan
Page 152
ρρρρ
γγγγ
γγγγ γγγγ
ττττ γγγγ
γγγγ
γ γγ
γγγγ
ξξξξ
Page 178
El P
uerto
de
San
ta M
aría
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-100
025
05
00
750
10
00
12
50
15
00
Vs e
n m
/s
profundidad en m
spac
una
cap
asp
ac
do
s ca
pas
fk u
na c
apa
fk d
os c
apas
Page 194
Acelerograma 000142YA original
-0,6
-0,4
-0,2
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
tiempo (s)
acel
erac
ión
(m/s
2)
Acelerograma 000142YA escalado
-0,6
-0,4
-0,2
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
tiempo (s)
acel
erac
ión
(m/s
2)
Page 195
Acelerograma 000181YA original
-0,9-0,7-0,5-0,3-0,10,10,30,50,70,9
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
tiempo (s)
acel
erac
ión
(m/s
2)
Acelerograma 000181YA escalado
-0,9-0,7-0,5-0,3-0,10,10,30,50,70,9
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
tiempo (s)
acel
erac
ión
(m/s
2)
Acelerograma 000855YA original
-0,6
-0,4
-0,2
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
tiempo (s)
acel
erac
ión
(m/s
2)
Acelerograma 000855YA escalado
-0,6
-0,4
-0,2
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
tiempo (s)
acel
erac
ión
(m/s
2)
Page 196
Acelerograma 000280ZA original
-0,6
-0,4
-0,2
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0 5 10 15 20 25
tiempo (s)
acel
erac
ión
(m/s
2)
Acelerograma 000280ZA escalado
-0,6
-0,4
-0,2
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0 5 10 15 20 25
tiempo (s)
acel
erac
ión
(m/s
2)
Acelerograma 000046ZA original
-0,6
-0,4
-0,2
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
tiempo (s)
acel
erac
ión
(m/s
2)
Acelerograma 000046ZA escalado
-0,6
-0,4
-0,2
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
tiempo (s)
acel
erac
ión
(m/s
2)
Page 285
ω
ω ω
ξ ρ ξ
ξ
+
=
ξω
ω
[ ]ωξωω
+=
ρ ξ
Page 286
ξ ωω
ω π π
ω π π ω
=
=
α
Page 290
ω
ω
αβ μ ρ
α β μ ρ
Page 291
( )( ) −=
−
−
ββ
μ
βμ
β β