-
Connie LaRue 1045 Kitt-Narcisse Rd Colville, Washington
99114
USPS Cert. Mail 7011 3500 0001 8625 5608 TO: Commission on
Judicial Conduct
210 11th Ave SW #400 Olympia, WA 98501
USPS Cert. Mail 70113500 000186255622 TO: Office of Disciplinary
Counsel Washington State Bar Association 1325 Fourth Avenue, Suite
600 Seattle, WA 98101-2539
THE COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT
COMPLAINT FOR DISBARMENT AND REFERRAL FOR PROSECUTION OF GINA A.
TVEIT, WSBA #19607, FOR CRIMINAL IMPERSONATION OF A PUBI.IC
OFFICIAL,
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND VIOLATING HER SWORN OATH OF
ATTORNEY.
LaRue relies on the following relevant facts, statutes and court
rulings from the Washington state and Federal courts in making this
complaint.
FACTS:
1. GINA A. TVEIT (hereafter TVEIT) was appointed to the position
of STEVENS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, and on August 26,2009.
TVEIT swore, subscribed and FILED her Oath of Office with the
COUNTY AUDITOR, paying the required filing fee of $63.00 (RCW
36.18.010\ that empowered the COUNTY AUDITOR to record the Oath
into the official public records: Auditor File No. 2009 0007449 in
compliance with state law (RCW 65.04.015(2), (3) and (4)). (See
Oaths of TVEIT enclosed).
2. Subsequent to TVEIT's appointment, she won two consecutive
general elections, 2010 and 2014, for the Office of STEVENS COUNTY
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE but both times thumbing her nose2 at
Washington state law and her Oath of Attorney.
RCW 36.18.010 (3) All such other papers or writing as are
required by law to be recorded and such as are reqUired by law to
be filed. 2 Thumbed Her Nose: Idiom: "to show that you do not
respect rules, laws..."
COMPLAINT FOR DISBARMENT AND REFERRAL FOR PROSECUTION - GINA A.
TVEIT Page 1 of 12
I
-
3. In 2010 and 2014, after election, TVEIT did not pay the
requisite FILING Fees RCW 65.04.030 and the COUNTY AUDITOR was not
empowered to assign a unique Auditor File Number on TVEIT's Oath of
OFFICE to record and incorporate it into the official public
records in accordance with RCW 65.04.015(2), (3) and (4).
4. TVEIT's failure to comply with state law in 2010 and 2014 -
to "duly qualify" (RCW 42.20.030) - BEFORE assuming the duties of
the office of DISTRICT COURT JUDGE (RCW 36.16.040)' has resulted in
TVEIT's criminal usurpation of that elective office.
5. TVEIT swore an OATH OF ATIORNEY (see RCW 2.48.210) on file
with the WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT stating in relevant part:
"I am fully subject to the laws of the State of Washington and
the laws of the United States, and will abide by the same."; "I
will support the constitution of the State of Washington and the
constitution of the United States"; and "I will abide by the Rules
of Professional Conduct approved by the Supreme Court of the State
of Washington."
6. TVEIT, by her own actions of paying the requisite FILING Fee
in 2009, had knowledge of the law that all filing fees are
mandatory and are to be paid in advance. See RCW 65.04.130; State v
Nelson; State v. Conners quoted under the Relevant Law Relied Upon"
herein below; "ignorance of the law does not excuse".
7. TVEIT has been knowingly, willfully and criminally
impersonating a public officer and usurping a public office since
the first of January 2011.
8. TVEIT was served by the People on Stevens County with a
Notice of Non-Compliance with State Law, a Notice of Vacancy of
Office, and a Directive to Answer to the People, and all three
times she remained silent3 when she had "a legal or moral duty to
speak or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally
misleading."
9. During TVEIT's "tenure" of the criminal usurpation of the
office of STEVENS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, TVEIT has conducted
thousands of illegal "prosecutions" by fraud and deception, passing
off a simulated legal process as legitimate legal process,
resulting in the deprivations of people's property through
unauthorized fines and their lives through illegal
imprisonments.
3 U.S. v. Prudden, 424 F.2d. 1021;U.S. v. Tweel, SSO F. 2d. 297,
299, 300 (1977) Silence can only be equated with fraud when there
is a legal and moral duty to speak or when an inquiry left
unanswered would be intentionally misleading. We cannot condone
this shocking conduct... If that is the case we hope our message is
clear. This sort of deception will not be tolerated and if this is
routine it should be corrected immediately.
COMPLAINT FOR DISBARMENT AND REFERRAL FOR PROSECUTION - GINA A.
TVEIT Page 2 of 12
-
10. Also, during TVEIT's "tenure" of criminally impersonating a
STEVENS COUNlY DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, TVEIT has appointed at least
one DISTRICT COURT COMMISSIONER/PRO TEM "JUDGE", named LLOYD
NICKEL.
11. NICKEL is a WASHINGTON STATE BAR licensed attorney, BAR
#9065, and is charged with being fully subject to and abiding by
the law as stated on his sworn Oath of Attorney.
12. It was NICKEL's duty to vet the legality of TVEIT's
duly-qualified status before accepting an appointment from
TVEIT.
13. NICKEL is relevant to this complaint against TVEIT because
NICKEL was "assigned" to sit in "judgment" over LaRue in CllY OF
CHEWELAH v. CONNIE LARUE in STEVENS COUNlY DISTRICT COURT, Cases
No. 5Z0133878 and No. 5Z0133879.
14. Because of TVEIT's unauthorized and illegal appointment,
NICKEL has criminally usurped that Commissioner/Pro Tem Office and
has conducted an illegal "prosecution" of LaRue by fraud and
deception, passing off a simulated legal process as legitimate
legal process.
15. NICKEL's actions have resulted in the illegal deprivation of
LaRue's property through unauthorized fines, and her life through
illegal imprisonment including extortion of LaRue's time, energy
and meager finances to defend against an illegal prosecution.
16. TVEIT, having failed to "duly qualify" for the OFFICE OF
STEVENS COUNlY DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, illegally "found probable
cause" to pass off a simulated legal process as a legitimate and
lawful process; an action that instituted a RIC04 extortion case
against LaRue.
17. From LaRue's experiences during election campaigning (a
candidate for STEVENS COUNlY CORONER in the 2014 election cycle)
LaRue believes she has been targeted for harassment through an
illegal traffic stop. The stop resulted in a false arrest, false
imprisonment in the county jail and other such illegal acts like
extortion in the second degree, by impersonators in public office
operating a RICO enterprise in STEVENS COUNlY, namely, GINA TVEIT
WSBA #19607; LLOYD NICKEL WSBA #9065; TIMOTHY RASMUSSEN WSBA
#32105; JESSICA TAYLOR WSBA #36248; and NICHOLAS FORCE WSBA #37659,
for exercising her right to travel to a safe and welllighted area
because STEVENS COUNlY is renown for its recent rash of rapist
cops.
4 The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act,
commonly referred to as the RICO Act or simply RICO, is a United
States federal law that provides for extended criminal penalties
and a civil cause of action for acts performed as part of an
ongoing criminal organization.
COMPLAINT FOR DISBARMENT AND REFERRAL FOR PROSECUTION - GINA A.
TVEIT Page 3 of 12
-
18. Again, TVEIT has participated in "recharging" LaRue, this
time naming the STATE OF WASHINGTON as the Plaintiff (STEVENS
COUNTY DISTRICT COURT No. P7944) which has resulted in LaRue
remaining under threat, duress and coercion, with the continuing
deprivation of LaRue's time, energy and meager finances.
19. LaRue filed an Application for Writ of Prohibition,
Injunction and Show Cause Order in the STEVENS COUNTY SUPERIOR
COURT demanding a duly-qualified SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE hear LaRue's
case.
20. LaRue states that she is being illegally prosecuted in
STEVENS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT using a deceptive simulated legal
process, for exercising one of her constitutionally protected
right.
21. More than 20 days have passed and LaRue's efforts in STEVENS
COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT have been stifled (obstructing justice) by a
non-qualified "judge" named ALLEN C. NIELSON, who is holding up the
process of approving LaRue's application to proceed without costs
(in forma pauperis status).
22. Although LaRue has been unable to obtain justice in the
STEVENS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT (through the illegal actions of
criminal usurpers to public office, TVEIT, NICKEL, RASMUSSEN,
TAYLOR and FORCE) and STEVENS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT "JUDGES" (ALLEN
C. NIELSON and PATRICK A. MONASMITH), the WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF
LICENSING has continued to move forward by issuing a NOTICE OF
SUSPENSION of LaRue's license, (an unjustified extortion threat
with the very real potential of punishment) that could result in
LaRue being stopped, assaulted, kidnapped and falsely imprisoned
again, in spite of the fact that LaRue has not been found guilty of
anything.
23. TVEIT has illegally usurped a public office and criminally
impersonated a public officer and her illegal conduct has been
protected by one or more persons in STEVENS COUNTY that have also
not duly qualified to occupy certain public offices related to
LaRue's complaints.
24. An honest audit of STEVENS COUNTY would expose that
thousands of Citizens have been deprived of their unalienable
rights of life, liberty and property through illegal fines and/or
incarceration from TVEIT's actions in conspiracy with other
persons. This STEVENS COUNTY RICO enterprise has infected this
County with illegal assaults (and assaults with a deadly weapon),
false arrests, kidnapping, false imprisonment, extortion and other
crimes against the people.
25. TVEIT has repeatedly violated her OATH OF ATTORNEY.
26. Every action taken by TVEIT while impersonating a public
officer is a criminal act for which she has yet to be held
accountable.
COMPLAINT FOR DISBARMENT AND REFERRAL FOR PROSECUTION - GINA A.
TVEIT Page 4 of 12
-
I declare that the foregoing facts are true and correct to the
best of my knowledge, understanding and belief.
Further I sayeth naught.
All Rights Reserved
Ccoot\,i r k~u...e Connie LaRue, Affiant
JURAT Washington State } Stevens County } ss.
I, aML t4 01 doCcH ' a Washington Notary Public, do certify that
Connie LaRue appeared before me and swears under penalty of perjury
that the foregoing is true.
On this, the2.l-~ay of ::S~i -" 2015. ... :~::I::~,,! .. . I,'
"t '. -.
{ .... ' .. /1~t?)~ /V\ ~l!--:~ .;.' c.': ",.,"'>' .;-,-'"\
..~. 6~~ LLJ ~~ ~Ctt ,7 :~:,'.~ Washington Notary Public
"""--'---;,., .... ~ 'yJ: 1....;t'~! My appointment expires 0e2
_0,3 . ~/~. I;; ~ , ,'p;
~,' y ~ ....... ...."t ~~. ~:....: "'" '-}J ,I"~, \.J ",:", ~.
.' T........ "F.. '" V .'t,f>'.." "":..,.r
'~'/,
-
RELEVANT LAW RELIED UPON IN SUPPORT OF THIS COMPLAINT:
'We have no officers in this government from the President down
to the most subordinate agent, who does not hold office under the
law, with prescribed duties and limited authority. And while some
of these...exercise powers in some sense left to the more general
definitions necessarily incident to fundamental/aw found in the
Constitution the larqer portion of them are the creation of
statutory law. with duties and powers prescribed and limited bv
law/' [Pierce v. United States] THE FLOYD ACCEPTANCES, 74 US 666 at
676-677; (7 Wall. 666), Supreme Court 1868, Washington Law
Reporter, Vol. XUI Page 297.
Maxim of Law: "What does not appear does not exist."
Maxim of Law: Ignorantia juris non excusat: "Ignorance of the
law does not excuse."
Black's Law 6th Edition states: "Duly Qualified" - Being "duly
qualified" to fill an office, in the constitutional sense and in
the ordinary acceptation of the words, means that the officer shall
possess every qualification; that he shall in all respects comply
with every requisite before entering on duties of the office; and
that he shall be bound by oath or affirmation to support the
Constitution and to perform the duties of the office with fidelity.
Black's Law Dictionary 6th Edition.
RCW 42.20.030 (in relevant part) - Intrusion into and refusal to
surrender public office. Every person who shall falsely personate
or represent any public officer, ... or who shall willfully
exercise any of the functions or perform any of the duties of such
officer, without having dulv qualified therefore, as required by
law, ... shall be guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
"The fact that the candidate is qualified at the time of his
election is not sufficient to entitle him to hold the office if, at
the time of his commencement to his term of office, or during the
continuance of the term, he ceases to be qualified. Eligibility to
public office is of a continuing nature, and must subsist at the
commencement of the term, and during the occupancy of the office.
1/ Washington Attorney General Opinion - AGO 63-64, no. 17.
COMPLAINT FOR DISBARMENT AND REFERRAL FOR PROSECUTION - GINA A.
lVEIT Page 6 of 12
-
LEGISLATIVE MANDATES TO DULY QUALIFY FOR PUBLIC OFFICE SUPPORTED
BY WASHINGTON COURT RULINGS
1. RCW 2.48.210 Oath on admission requires an Oath of Attorney
before authorization to practice law in Washington stating: "Every
person before being admitted to practice law in this state shall
take and subscribe the following oath".
2. Right to hold public office is subject to qualifications
imposed by legislature." State ex rei. Carroll v. Simmons (1962) 61
Wash.2d 146, 377 P.2d 421, cert, denied 83 S. Ct. 1698,374 U.S.
808, 10 L. Ed.2d 1032
3. "Use of word "shaWl in statute imposes mandatory duty/I Waste
Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities and Trans. Com'n, 869 P.2d
1034, 123 Wash.2d 621, reconsideration denied (1994).
4. RCW 36.16.040 Oath of office. "Every person elected to county
office shall before he or she enters upon the duties of his or her
office take and subscribe an oath or affirmation that he or she
will faithfully and impartially discharge the duties of his or her
office to the best of his or her ability."
5. RCW 36.16.060 Place of filing oaths and bonds. "Every county
officer, before entering upon the duties of his or her office,
shall file his or her oath of office in the office of the county
auditor and his or her official bond in the office of the county
clerk... Oaths and bonds of deputies shall be filed in the offices
in which the oaths and bonds of their principals are required to be
filed."
6. RCW 65.04.030 Instruments to be recorded or filed. The
auditor or recording officer must, upon the payment of the fees as
required in RCW 36.18.010... (3) All such other papers or writing
as are required by law to be recorded and such as are required by
law to be filed.
7. RCW 65.04.130 Fees to be paid or tendered. Said county
auditor is not bound to record any instrument, or file any paper or
notice, or furnish any copies, or to render any service connected
with his or her office, until his or her fees for the same, as
prescribed by law, are if demanded paid or tendered.
"Provision requiring payment of fees in advance is mandatory."
State v. Nelson (1940) 6 Wash.2d 190, 107 P.2d 1113.
COMPLAINT FOR DISBARMENT AND REFERRAL FOR PROSECUTION - GINA A.
TVEIT Page 7 of 12
-
"When papers are received by officer for filing, filing will not
become effective until necessary fees have been paid." State v.
Conners (1942) 12 Wash.2d 128, 120 P.2d 1002; State v. Nelson
(1940) 6 Wash.2d 190, 107 P.2d 1113.
"Statutes relating to compensation of public officer must be
strictly construed in favor of government, and such officers are
entitled only to what is clearly given by law." Murphy v. State
Dept. of Licensing (1981) 28 Wash. App. 620, 675 P.2d 732.
"Day on which oath of office is signed and filed by judge of
superior court Ii. day on which he assumes office for purposes of
pension benefits. and day of Governor's announcement of proposed
appointment is immaterial./I Jordan v. O'Brien (1971) 79 Wash.2d
406, 486 P.2d 890.
8. RCW 65.08.150 Duty to Record: A recording officer, upon
payment or tender to him or her of the lawful fees therefor, shall
record in his or her office any instrument authorized or permitted
to be so recorded by the laws of this state or by the laws of the
United States.
9. "When legislative body provides definitions for statutory
terms, it is that definition to which the person must conform his
conduct." City of Seattle v. Koh, 26 Wash. App. 708, 614 P.2d 665
(1980).
"'Where an act uses the word in a special sense which it
defines, definition by average man or by ordinary dictionary is not
substitute for the definitions contained in the act." National
Homeopathic Hospital Ass'n of District of Columbia et.al. v.
Britton, Deputy Com'r., 147 F2d 561.
10. Legislative Definitions (summation) of "FILE", "FILED", or
"FILING" and "RECORD", "RECORDED" or "RECORDING" RCW 65.04.015(2)
FILED for "recording into the official public record" RCW 65.04.015
(3) RECORD "after filing to incorporate the instrument into the
public records" RCW 65.04.015 (4) "RECORDING NUMBER" Assignment of
an "auditor or recording officer file number""that identifies the
storage location" "of each instrument in the public records"
"accessible in the same recording office where the instrument
containing the reference to the location is found."
11. RCW 5.44.040 Certified copies of public records as evidence.
Copies of all records and documents on record or on file in the
offices of the various departments of the United States and of this
state or any other state or territory of the United States, when
duly certified by the respective officers having by law the custody
thereof, under their respective seals where such officers have
official seals,
COMPLAINT FOR DISBARMENT AND REFERRAL FOR PROSECUTION - GINA A.
TVEIT Page 8 of 12
-
shall be admitted in evidence in the courts of this state.
[NOTE: If the fees for filing and/or recording are not paid in
advance, an oath of office cannot be made a part of the official
public record.]
12. RCW 42.20.100 Failure of duty by public officer a
misdemeanor. Whenever any duty is enjoined by law upon any public
officer or other person holding any public trust or employment,
their wilful neqlect to perform such duty, except where otherwise
speciallv provided for, shall be a misdemeanor.
13. RCW 9A.80.010 Official Misconduct, (l)(a) ... intentionally
commits an unauthorized act under color of law (b) ...
intentionally refrains from performing a duty imposed upon him or
her by law. (2) Official misconduct is a gross misdemeanor, defined
at RCW 9.92.020.
14. RCW 42.12.010 Causes of vacancy, Every elective office shall
become vacant on the happening ofany of the following events: (5)
... any offense involving a violation of his or her official oath;
(6) His or her refusal or neglect to take his or her oath of
office, or to give or renew his or her official bond, or to deposit
such oath or bond within the time prescribed bv law.
15. RCW 42.20.030 -Intrusion into and refusal to surrender
public office. Every person who shall falsely personate or
represent any public officer, or who shall willfully intrude
himself into a public office to which he has not been duly elected
or appointed, or who shall willfully exercise any of the functions
or perform any of the duties, without having duly qualified as
required by law, ..., shall be guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
16. RCW 9A.56.130 Extortion in the second degree. (1) A person
is guilty of extortion in the second degree if he commits extortion
by
means of threat as defined in RCW 9A.04.110(28)(d) through (j).
(2) Extortion in the second degree is a class Cfelony.
RCW 9A.04.110 - Definitions. (28) ((Threat" means to communicate
directly or indirectly the intent: (h) To take wrongful action as
an official against anyone or anything, or wrongfully withhold
official action, or cause such action or withholding;
The Washington Legislature enacted two laws, one which was
enacted in 1866 and another that was enacted in 1909, both of which
are still on the books and are now recodified as RCW 42.12.010 and
42.20.030.
COMPLAINT FOR DISBARMENT AND REFERRAL FOR PROSECUTION - GINA A.
TVEIT Page 9 of 12
-
RCW 42.12.010 originally enacted in 1866 and to date, remains
almost unchanged, allows no grace period under subsection (6) for
any refusal or neglect [to duly qualify] within the time prescribed
by law.
RCW 42.20.030 was originally enacted in 1909 and has never been
changed and contains four different offenses that constitute the
act of intrusion into public office and one for refusal to
surrender public office.
Three of these offenses require certain acts to be performed
"willfully" in order to be a crime, but two of the offenses only
require that certain acts be performed.
The first element states, "Every person who shall falsely
personate or represent any public officer, or ... " Notice that no
intent is required.
The second element states, "who shall willfully intrude himself
into a public office to which he has not been duly elected or
appointed, or ... " Willfulness is established by knowledge (RCW
9A.08.010) and "duly" is defined in Black's Law Dictionary 6th Ed.
as "In due and proper form or manner; according to legal
requirements....; according to law in both form and substance.
"
The third element states, "who shall willfully exercise any of
the functions or perform any of the duties ofsuch officer, without
having duly qualified therefor, as required by law; or... "
"Being duly qualified to fill an office, in the constitutional
sense and in the ordinary acceptation of the words, means that the
officer shall possess every qualification; that he shall in all
respects comply with every requisite before entering on the duties
of the office; and that he shall be bound by oath or affirmation to
support the Constitution, and to perform the duties of the office
with fidelity. " Black's Law Dictionary 6th Ed.
The fourth element states, "Who, having been an executive or
administrative officer, shall willfully exercise any of the
functions of his office after his right to do so has ceased, or
..."
The fifth element states, "wrongfully refuse to surrender the
official seal or any books or papers appertaining to such office,
upon the demand of his lawful successor shall be guilty of a gross
misdemeanor." See RCW 9A.60.040 Impersonating a Public Officer and
RCW Chapter 7.56 Quo Warranto.
RCW 9a.60.040 Criminal impersonation in the first degree. (1) A
person is guilty of criminal impersonation in the first degree if
the person:
(a) Assumes a false identity and does an act in his or her
assumed character with intent to defraud another or for any other
unlawful purpose; or
(b) Pretends to be a representative of some person or
organization or a public servant and does an act in his or her
pretended capacity with intent to defraud another or for any other
unlawful purpose.
(2) Criminal impersonation in the first degree is a class
Cfelony.
COMPLAINT FOR DISBARMENT AND REFERRAL FOR PROSECUTION - GINA A.
TVEIT Page 10 of 12
-
CONCLUSIONS RELIED UPON FOR THIS CRIMINAL COMPLAINT:
First, if the fees for filing are not paid in advance, an oath
of office cannot be made a part of the official public record. see
RCW 5.44.040.
second, if the official oath is not made part of the official
public record, it grants no lawful authority.
Third, if the oath is not filed as defined in RCW 65.04.040, it
is not part of the official public record.
RCW 65.04.040 Method for recording instruments - Marginal
notations Arrangement of records. Any state. county, or municipal
officer charged with the duty of recording instruments in public
records shall record them by *record location number in the order
filed, irrespective of the type of instrument, using a process that
has been tested and approved for the intended purpose bv the state
archivist. In addition the county auditor or recording officer, in
the exercise of the duty of recording instruments in public
records, may, in lieu of transcription record all instruments, that
he or she is charged by law to record, by any electronic data
transfer, photographic, photostatic, microfilm, microcard,
miniature photographic or other process that actually reproduces or
forms a durable medium for so reproducing the original, and which
has been tested and approved for the intended purpose by the state
archivist. If the county auditor or recording officer records any
instrument by a process approved by the state archivist it shall
not be necessary thereafter to make any notations or marginal
notes, which are otherwise required by law, thereon if, in lieu of
making said notations thereon, the auditor or recording officer
immediately makes a note of such in the general index in the column
headed "remarks," listing the record number location of the
instrument to which the current entry relates back. Previously
recorded or filed instruments may be processed and preserved by any
means authorized under this section for the original recording of
instruments. The county auditor or recording officer may provide
for the use of the public, media containing reproductions of
instruments and other materials that have been recorded pursuant to
the provisions of this section. The contents of the media may be
arranged according to date of filing, irrespective of type of
instrument, or in such other manner as the county auditor or
recording officer deems proper.
Fourth, if the oath of office is not actually made part of the
official public record, as defined in law, it cannot be admitted
into evidence under ER 902(d) or ER 1005 to support a lawful claim
for salaries or benefits [or for any other purpose] relating to a
public office.
COMPLAINT FOR DISBARMENT AND REFERRAL FOR PROSECUTION - GINA A.
TVEIT Page 11 of 12
-
Fifth, as shown by the case law already supplied to you, all
filing fees are mandatory and are to be paid in advance and your
[STATE AUDITOR] examiners are supposed to know that an oath of
office, an appointment to a public office, and an official bond are
required by law to be filed and/or recorded into and made part of
the official public record, requiring a paid receipt for those
transactions. AUDITORs know that there can be no lawful occupation
of the intended office by a person impersonating a public official
or usurping a public office.
Sixth, there are several sections in RCW 43.09 that would cover
your [STATE AUDITOR's] department responsibility to verify that the
bonds, appointments and oaths were filed, as required by law, such
as RCW 43.09.200, 43.09.210, 43.09.230, and 43.09.245 but, under
43.09.260 your department has specific information as to what is
required pursuant to subsection (5). RCW 43.09.260(5) ({On every
such examination, inquiry shall be made as to the financial
condition and resources of the local government; whether the
Constitution and laws of the state, the ordinances and orders of
the local government and the requirements of the state auditor have
been properly complied with, and into the methods and accuracy of
the accounts and reports."
IN CLOSING
For the foregoing reasons supported by facts, relevant law,
statutes, and Washington court rulings, GINA A. TVEIT WSBA #19607,
should be disbarred and referred by this body of examiners and
mandatory reporters for criminal prosecution before the appropriate
authorities, state or federal.
It is my firmly held conviction that the laws and legislative
mandates relied upon herein are relevant to support the conclusions
that LaRue's unalienable rights were violated. GINA A. TVEIT's
CRIMINAL IMPERSONATION OF A PUBLIC OFFICIAL, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
AND VIOLATING HER SWORN OATH OF ATTORNEY warrant this COMPLAINT FOR
DISBARMENT AND REFERRAL FOR PROSECUTION.
All Rights Reserved
Connie LaRue
COMPLAINT FOR DISBARMENT AND REFERRAL FOR PROSECUTION - GINA A.
TVEIT Page 12 of 12
-
INDEX OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT 1: TVEITs originally FILED Oath of
Office compliant with state law.
EXHIBIT 2: TVEITs 2010 and 2014 non-compliant-with-state law
Oaths of Office impersonating a DISTRICT COURT JUDGE in STEVENS
COUNTY. EXHIBIT 3: Unauthorized appointment of NICKEL by TVEIT.
EXHIBIT 4: Non Compliant NICKEL Oath of Office. EXHIBIT 5: TVEIT
Notice of Non-Compliance with State Law EXHIBIT 6: TVEIT Notice of
Vacancy of Office EXHIBIT 7: TVEIT Directive to Answer to the
People EXHIBIT 8: First two charging instruments CITY OF CHEWELAH
v. CONNIE LARUE Case No. 5Z0133878 & Case No. 5Z0133879; Orders
and Affidavits. EXHIBIT 9: Order for dismissal of cases No.
5Z0133878 & No 5Z0133879 EXHIBIT 10: New Charge STATE OF
WASHINGTON v. Connie LaRue, Case No. P7944 using the same illegal
police report to justify re-prosecuting LaRue to extort over $1062.
EXHIBIT 11: WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING NOTICE OF SUSPENSION
EXHIBIT 12: STEVENS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT NOTICE OF DELINQENCY
NOTICE There is no evidence that any of the below-named
impersonators of a public official and criminal usurpers of a
public office are compliant with state law. None have an oath of
office or appointment properly filed and incorporated into the
official public records. This blatant disregard for Washington
State Law has deprived LaRue of her right to Justice through Due
Process of Law at minimum.
TIMOTHY RASMUSSEN JESSICA TAYLOR SAUNDRA RICHARTZ NICHOLAS FORCE
KENDLE ALLEN TROY ANDERSON
JOHNATHAN BOWERS GINA A. TVEIT
LLOYD B. NICKEL ALLEN C. NIELSON
PATRICK A. MONASMITH
-
This "Oath of Office" is in compliance with state law as defined
in RCW 65.04.015(2), (3) and (4). It contains the requisite Auditor
File #, required Fee Paid RCW 36.18.010(3), etc.
EXHIBIT 1
-
/
"
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss OATH OF OFFICE
County of Stevens
I, Gina A. Tveit, do solemnly swear and affirm that I am a
Citizen of the United States of America and the State ofWashingtonj
that I will support the Constitution and Laws of the United States
ofAmerica and the Constitution and Laws of the State of Washington,
and the laws of Stevens County, and will to the best of my
judgment, skill, and abitity, faithfully, diligently and
impartially perform the duties of the office of District Court
Judge in and for the County of Stevens, Washington as such duties
are prescribed by law.
Gina A. Tveit
Subscribed and sworn to before me this c77)'4- day of December,
2010.
Tim Gray Auditor for Stevens Coun
/
RECEIVED DEC 27 ZOJ
Initials /Timeh /ov~t/:H:1 Stevens County Auditor
This "Oath of Office" does not comply with state law as defined
in RCW 65.04.015(2), (3) and (4). There is no Auditor File #, No
evidence of required Fee Paid (RCW 36.18.010(3)), etc. This "oath"
has not been made a part of the official public record. This "oath"
is just a worthless piece of paper.
EXHIBIT 2
-
STATE OF WASH~01GTON}
COUNTY OF STEVENS
OATH OF OFFICE
Subscribed and sworn to before me this d~ day of )J~(~V
Person administering 0
Rctu n Document to: Stevens Count)' Auditor 215 S Oak, Room 106
Colville, WA. 99114-2836 RECEIVED ,t.ro hU"J)
DEC 22 2014
BY:~
This "Oath of Office" does not comply with state law as defined
in RCW 65.04.015(2), (3) and (4). There is no Auditor File #, No
evidence of required Fee Paid (RCW 36.18.010(3)), etc. This "oath"
has not been made a part of the official public record. This "oath"
is just a worthless piece of paper.
-
This "Appointment" of NICKEL is a false document signed by
criminal usurper of the office of STEVENS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT
JUDGE. Has no force in law.
EXHIBIT 3
-
For the same reasons as the "Appointment" and "Oath" above, it
is VOID. Plus, this "Oath of Office" does not comply with state law
as defined in RCW 65.04.015(2), (3) and (4). There is no Auditor
File #, No evidence of required Fee Paid (RCW 36.18.010(3)), etc.
This "oath" has not been made a part of the official public record.
This "oath" is just a worthless piece of paper.
EXHIBIT 4
-
J}.OTICE OF J}.ON-COMPLIANCE WITH ~TATE 'l.AW in Common Law
Court of Record Over Two Witnesses
Lex Naturalis Dei Gratia Notice to Respondeat Superior is Notice
to Respondeat Inferior. Notice to Respondeat Inferior is Notice to
Respondeat Superior.
FROM: The Sovereign People on Stevens county, on Washington
state.
TO: Gina A. Tveit 215 S. Oak St. Colville, Washington 99114
The people ofStevens County hereby serve Notice to you, Gina A.
Tveit, that there appears to be evidence you are not compliant with
Washington State Law.
1. By not causing your own personal Oath of Office I to be
properly filed and made a permanent part of the official public
records of Stevens County [RCW 65.04.015(2); RCW 36.16.060; RCW
65.04.030(3); RCW 65.04.130]; and
2. You may also be responsible for having caused any appointed
"deputies and assistants" who are defmed as officers2, to similarly
fail to make their Appointment(s) and Oath(s) of Office properly
indexed wherein they are actually of record in the office of the
Stevens County Auditor.
Non-compliance with state law calls into question your knowledge
of the law, ability to administer the law and to function in the
capacity of Stevens County District Court Judge. You knew, or
should have known, that neglect and/or willful failure to comply
with certain legislative acts codified in the Revised Codes of
Washington, and your sworn Oath to uphold the laws and Constitution
of the State ofWashington establishes a defect and failure to duly
qualify for office.
"... ifan officer is so careless ofthe requirements ofthe law
under which he is elected that he neglects to qualifY, it is a fair
indication that he will be neglectful in the transaction ofthe
duties ofhis office. " State ex reI. Vanderveer v. Gormley 104 P.
620, 53 Wash. 543 - 1909
Furthermore, a breach of a duty imposed by law is a violation of
the Oath of Office. You knew or should have known that your actions
- or lack thereof - to remain at all times compliant with the law
as enjoined by law upon any public officer, is a violation of your
Oath ofOffice3 and Washington State Law. Fines and penalties
associated with the commission of acts are defmed as a misdemeanor
and/or gross misdemeanor, or a felony if one of the people incurred
a personal injury as a result of actions that may have been taken
by you under color oflaw, color of office and/or color of authority
[18 USC 242].
1 See copy of your Oath of Office (attached) which is not
compliant with Washington State Law as codified in the RCWs. 2 CODE
OF ETHICS: RCW 42.23020(1): "officer" shall each include all
elected and appointed officers together with all deputies and
assistants of such an officer. 3 See RCW 29A.56.11O Definitions (1)
"Misfeasance" or "malfeasance" in office means any wrongful conduct
that affects, interrupts, or interferes with the performance of
official duty;
(a) Additionally, "misfeasance" in office means the performance
of a duty in an improper manner; and (b) Additionally,
"malfeasance" in office means the commission of an unlawful act;
(2) "Violation of the oath of office" means the neglect or knowing
failure by an elective public officer to perform faithfully a
duty imposed by law.
,BoTleE OF .f}ON-COMPLIANCE WITH 6TATE J.Aw .J)age 1 of 2
EXHIBIT 5
-
Your office may also be vacant. Per RCW 42.12.010 Causes of
vacancy, wherein (5) ... any offense involving a violation of his
or her official oath; (6) His or her refusal or neglect to take his
or her oath of office, or to give or renew his or her official
bond, or to deposit4 such oath or bond within the time prescribed
by law.
The people require the highest of ethical standard from their
elected officers so that public confidence in their ability to
abide by the law and effectively serve the people is assured.
Therefore, this Notice ofNon-compliance with State Law by the
Stevens County District Court Judge is to be served upon you by one
of sovereign people on Stevens County, Washington state, ever
mindful that "sovereignty itselfremains with the people, by whom
and/or whom all government exists and acts. "Yick Wo v. Hopkins,
118 U.S. 356 (1886).
,2014.
Printed Narne
1)'fV1lA~ J~l e. Ho..VLT 2_W,LL\(),ffl ~ Sn-q-th 3) Fr~JrA'~ ()
{!//tOcV ~ta ~ ~~
" ... at the mouth oftwo witnesses, or at the mouth ofthree
witnesses, shall e matter be established" Deuteronomy 19: 15; see
also Deuteronomy 17:6 " ... receive not an accusation unless where
there are two or three witnesses. " I Timothy 5: 19
Declaration of Service Washington state County of Stevens tl.
tLI n.. o~ fJ,,,r: ,/ / " -vI
I, w~ II, ~ ~./P.M., this the da of 20 ,in the city of /', at
the address of :. ,vl, uly served a copy of the forego~ Notice of
Non-compliance
with State Law by deli ering a copy of the above to the within
named l..lL) .. ~ :3 6 fL..p/ .I declare under penalty ofperjury
under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing
is true and correct. ~ (
By: ~~1.&o~~~~=t--5I~j-L~~=\'
4 Chapter 6504 RCW, Duties of County Auditor - specific, but not
limited to, RCW 65.04.015 Defmitions, (1) ''Recording officer"
means the county auditor ... charged with the responsibility for
recording instruments in the county records.; (2) "File," "filed."
or "filing" means the act ofdelivering or transmitting
electronically an instrument to the auditor ... (or recording into
the official public records.; (3) "Record," "recorded." or
"recording" means the process ... used by the ouditor ... aoer
filing to incorporate the instrument into the public records.; (4)
"Recording number" means a unique number that identifies the
storage location (book or volume and page, reel andframe,
instrument number, auditor ... file number. .. .) ofeach instrument
in the public records ... ; RCW 36.16.060 Place of filing oaths and
bonds; RCW 65.04.030 (3) including oaths of office required by law
to be filed in the county auditor's office; RCW 6504.130 Fees to be
paid; RCW 65.08.150 Duty to record; Failure of Duty by Public
Officer is subject to the penalties of the law described in RCW
42.20.100IRCW 9A.20.010 (2); RCW 9A.80010 (l)(a) ... intentionally
commits an unauthorized act under color oflaw (b) ... intentionally
retrains trom performing a duty imposed ''Pan him or her by law.
(2) OffiCial misconduct is a gross misdemeanor, defined at RCW
9.92.020.
1l0TICE OF .BON-COMPLIANCE WITH ilTATE J..AW ,J)age 2 of 2
-
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss OATH OF OFFICE
County ofStevens
I, Gina A. Tveit, do solemnly swear and affirm that I am a
Citizen of the United States ofAmerica and the State ofWashingron;
that I will support the Constirution and Laws of the United States
ofAmerica and the Constitution and Laws of the State of Washington,
and the laws of Stevens County, and will to the best of my
judgment, skill, and ability, faithfully, diligently and
impartially perform the duties of the office of District Court
Judge in and for the County of Stevens, Washington as such duties
are prescribed by law.
Gina A. Tveit
Subscribed and sworn to before me this cTl ~ day of December,
2010.
Tim Gray Auditor for Stevens Coun
RECEIVED DEC 27 20':8
f.
Initials I Timeh /()V~AH:r '.r. Stevens County Auditor
-"'" ~;~ .::: ':J
~; .::;~ ;..... "+-,,'" ~
'...
", ;r "
-
RECE\VE 2~ 20\~J}OTICE OF l)ACANCY OF C!&FFICE
in Common Law Court of Record Over Two Witnesses Lex Naturalis
Dei Gratia
Notice to Respondeat Superior is Notice to Respondeat Inferior.
Notice to Respondeat Inferior is Notice to Respondeat Superior.
FROM: The Sovereign People on Stevens county, on Washington
state.
TO: Gina A. Tveit 215 S. Oak St. Colville, Washington 99114
The people of Stevens County hereby serve you, Gina A. Tveit,
Notice that the Office of Stevens County District Court Judge is
vacant per RCW 42.12.010.
On April 8, 2014, you were served Notice that you were in
non-compliance with Washington state law because your oath of
office was not made a part of the official public records of
Stevens County it therefore does not exist. See: RCW 65.04.015(2);
RCW 36.16.060; RCW 65.04.030(3). RCW 65.04.130 makes it clear you
were to submit your oath of office and pay the requisite filing
fee. By failing to file your oath and make it a permanent part of
the official public records of Stevens County as the law requires,
you have neglected to qualify for that office.
"Officers are elected not for the benefit of the indiVidual, but
for the benefit of the community; and ~f an officer is so careless
of the requirements ofthe law under which he is elected that he
neglects to qucili./Y. it is a fair indication that he will be
neglectful in thi! transaction ofthe duties ofhis office. " Lysons
v. Ruff, 4 Wash. 234,29 P. 999 (1892).
Although the above quote was Justice Dunbar's dissenting
opinion, it is, however, important because that case was overturned
in Vandeveer v. Gormley, 153 Wash. 543, 102 P. 435 (1909). Also
see; Attorney General Opinion AGO 63-64, April 16, 1963, No. 17
and; AGLO January 11, 1980 NO.2.
Right to hold public office is subject to qualifications imposed
by legislature. " State ex rel. Carroll v. Simmons (1962) 61
Wash.2d 146, 377 P.2d 421, cert, denied 83 S. Ct. 1698, 374 U.S.
808, 10 L. Ed.2d 1032.
Now, as to your "oath", there are a few cases and RCW's that
confinn that your "oath" is invalid according to law.
"Use of word "shall" in statute imposes mandatory duty." Waste
Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities and Trans. Com'n, 869 P.2d
1034, 123 Wash.2d 621, reconsideration denied (1994).
Every official oath of office, whether for elective or
appointive office in the State of Washington shall be fIled.
RCW 36.16.060 Place offiling oaths and bonds.
Every county officer, before entering upon the duties ofhis or
her office, shall file his or her oath ofoffice in the office of
the county auditor and his or her offiCial bond in the office of
the county clerk:
..fl,OTICE OF ~ACANCY OF eFFICE J)age 1 of 5
EXHIBIT 6
-
PROVIDED, That the official bond of the county clerk, ajier
first being recorded by the county auditor, shall be filed in the
office ofthe county treasurer.
Oaths and bonds of deputies shall be filed in the offices in
which the oaths and bonds of their principals are required to be
filed.
The word "filed" has been defined by the State Legislature, as
it relates to the state, in RCW 65.04.015. RCW 65.04.015
Definitions. The definitions set forth in this section apply
throughout this chapter unless the context clearly
reqUires otherwise. (1) "Recording officer" means the county
auditor, or in charter counties the county offiCial charged
with
the responsibility for recording instruments in the county
records. (2) "File," "filed, " or ''filing'' means the act
ofdelivering or transmitting electronically an instrument to the
auditor or recording officer for recording into the offlcial public
record~. (3) "Record," "recorded," or "recording" means the
process, such as electronic, mechanical, optical, magnetiC, or
microfilm storage used by the auditor or recording officer after
filing to incorporate the instrument into the public records. (4)
"Recording number" means a unique number that identifies the
storage location (book or volume and page, reel and frame,
instrument number, auditor or recording officer tile number,
receiving number, electronic retrieval code, or other specific
place) of each instrument in the public records accessible in the
same recording offlce where the instrument containing the reference
to the location is found.
In order to incorporate a document into the official public
record, RCW 65.04.040 requires that a prescribed procedure shall be
complied with:
RCW 65.04.040 Method for recording instruments - Marginal
notations - Arrangement ofrecords. Any state, county, or municipal
officer charged with the duty of recording instruments in public
records shall record them by *record location number in the order
filed, irrespective of the type oOnstrument, using a process that
has been tested and approved for the intended purpose by the state
archivist. Notes:
*Reviser's note: The definition "recopd locdlion number" was
changed to "recording numoer" oy 1999 c 233 10.
Fees for recording instruments are found at: RCW 36.18.010.
"When legislative body proVides definitions for statutory terms,
it is that definition to which the person must conform his conduct.
" City of Seattle v. Koh, 26 Wash. App. 708, 614 P.2d 665
(1980).
"Where an act uses the word in a special sense which it defines,
definition by average man or by ordinary dictionary is not
substitute for the definitions contained in the act. " National
Homeopathic Hospital Ass'n of District of Columbia etal. v.
Britton, Deputy Com'f., 147 F2d 561.
Now, since your "oath of office" does not contain a "record
location number", it has not been "incorporated into the official
public record". It is invalid by operation of law. When there is no
principle there can be no agent and your invalid oath does not come
within the Washington Court Rules Of EvideJice 902(d) ot 1005. It
is therefore tender iIiadini.~sibletd slippbft yom claim to the
dffice.
RCW 42.20. 030 -Intrusion into and refusal to surrender public
office. Every person who shall falsely personate or represent any
public officer, or who shall willfully intrude himself into a
public office to which he has not been duly elected or appointed,
or who shall willfully
J}OTICE OF ~ACANCY OF .eFFICE ~age 2 of 5
-
exercise any of the functions or peiform any of the duties,
without having duly qualified as required by law, ..., shall be
gUilty ofa gross misdemeanor.
The word "willfully" is defmed in RCW 9A.08.010 as
"knowingly".
Ignorance offacts excuses, ignorance oflaw does not excuse. 1
Coke, 177.
It is required to be a registered voter to run for and hold
office. One must also declare to be a citizen of the United
States.
"Every citizen of the United States is supposed to know the law,
.... " Pierce v. United States, 7 Wall (74 U.S. 169) 666
(1869).
Again, as shown by the following Washington case law, neither
the County Auditor nor his agents have authority to waive the
mandatory filing fees, and further, not even the State is exempt
from these fees.
"Provision reqUiring payment offees in advance is mandatory. "
State v. Nelson (1940) 6 Wash.2d 190, 107 P.2d 1113.
"When papers are received by officer for filing, filing will not
become effective until necessary fees have been paid." State v.
Conners (1942) 12 Wash.2d 128, 120 P.2d 1002; State v. Nelson
(1940) 6 Wash.2d 190, 107 P.2d 1113.
"Statutes relating to compensation ofpublic officer must be
strictly construed in favor of government, and such officers are
entitled only to what is clearly given by law. " Murphy v. State
Dept. of Licensing (1981) 28 Wash. App. 620,675 P.2d 732.
"Day on which oath of office is signed and filed by judge
ofsuperior court is day on which he assumes offlce (or purposes o(
pension benefits, and day of Governor's announcement ofproposed
appointment is immaterial." Jordan v. O'Brien (1971) 79 Wash.2d
406, 486 P.2d 890.
If no fee was charged, collected and paid into the treasury for
the ftling and/or recording of the oath of office, the oath of
office has not actually been filed and has never been incorporated
into the official public record as required by law. Assuming a
public office and not processing ALL of the qualifications of that
office renders the person occupying the office a usurper.
One fmal issue is the filing of false certified salary
warrants.
"An officer defacto can not maintain a suit for fees." 24 Am.
Rep. 715; People v. Hobson, 1 Denio, 579.4.
RCW 42.20. 060 Falsely auditing and paying claims. Every public
officer, or person holding or discharging the duties of any public
office or place of trust under the state or in any county, town or
city, a part ofwhose duty it is to audit, allow or pay, or take
part in auditing, allowing or paying, claims or demands upon the
state or such county, town or City, who shall knowingly audit,
allow or pay, or, directly or indirectly, consent to or in any way
connive at the auditing, allowance or payment of any claim or
demand against the state or such county, town or city, which is
false or fraudulent or contains any charge, item or claim which is
false or fraudulent, shall be guilty ofa gross misdemeanor.
JiOTICE OF 'lJACANCY OF eFFICE llage 3 of 5
-
"Use oj-word "false" in connection with word "fraudulent" does
not indicate legislative purpose to include only such acts as are
corruptly false, or are done with willful design to cheat and
defraud public funds." State v. Case (1915) 88 Wash. 664, 153 P.2d
1070.
"Specific intent to violate law is impliedfrom fact ofviolation
even though person had no wrongful intent to do anything beyond
doing ofprohibited act. " State v. Case (1915) Supra.
RCW 9A. 72.080 - Statement ofwhat one does not know to be true.
Every unqualified statement of that which one does not know to be
true is equivalent to a statement ofthat which he knows to be
false.
"Statute defining perjury in any testimony, affidavit or "other
writing subscribed as [rue ", must be considered wilh tlfis
slalUle, (fl proseeurion for perjury in making statement or
affidavit before notary public. " State v. Ledford (1938) 195 Wn.
581, 81 P.2d 830.
Violation of two of the following RCW's will invoke the ten year
statute of limitation under RCW 9A.04.080 regarding public
officers.
RCW 9A. 72. 030 - Perjury in the second degree. (1) A person is
guilty ofperjury in the second degree if, in an examination under
oath under the
terms ofa contract of insurance, or with intent to mislead a
public servant in the performance ofhis or her duty, he or she
makes a materially false statement, which he or she knows to be
false under an oath req-uiredorauthorized by law.
(2) Perjury in the second degree is a class C felony.
"The distinction between perjury and false swearing is this,
viz.: "if the false statement be made in an oath or affidavit"
required by law, or made in "the course of a judicial proceeding,"
the offense is perjury; if the false voluntary oath or affidavit is
"not 'required l5y law or made ,n "the course of a judiCial
proceeding. "then it 'is false swearing. " State v. Howard, 91
Wash. 481.
RCW 9A.56.130 Extortion in the second degree. (1) A person is
guilty ofextortion in the second degree ifhe commits extortion by
means of threat as
defined in RCW9A. 04.110(27)(d) through 0). (2) ... (3)
Extortion in the second degree is a class C felony.
RCW 9A. 04.11 0 - Definitions. (27) "Threat" means to
communicate directly or indirectly the intent: (h) To take wrongful
action as an official against anyone or anything, or wrongfUlly
withhold
official action, or cause such action or withholding;
The law is clear, your office is vacant. More than 30 days have
transpired since you were served notice that you were in
non-compliance with state law. You have chosen to remain silent and
have continued to intrude into and usurp an office for which you
have failed to duly qualifY. That silence is your tacit admission
that you have no defense for your actions. You have a legal and
moral duty to speak. Having chosen to remain silent is tantamount
to fraud.
j}(JflEE Of '4JACANCY OfeFFICE ~age 4 of'S
-
The people require the highest of ethical standard from their
elected officers so that public confidence in their ability to
abide by the law and effectively serve the people is assured. You
have violated these standards of ethics and the people's trust. You
have unjustly taken compensation from the people's treasury you did
not qualify to receive.
You are hereby directed by the sovereign people on Stevens
County to:
1. Remove yourself from the County office you have usurped, and
2. Reimburse the people's treasury for your unjust enrichment
acquired since your intrusion into
that office (plus interest accrued at 12% compounded annually),
and/or 3. Face indictment for numerous and varied crimes.
"Sovereignty itselfremains with the people, by whom andfor whom
all government exists and acts. "Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356
(1886).
The sovereign people have so spoken.
Dated: May 24,2014
Printed Name
1) 20.\\j"
-
~EOPLE'S ~VERSIGHT ~OMMISSION POTENTATUS REs PUBLICA
Date: June 11,2014
To: Gina Tveit 215 S. Oak Colville, WA 99114
Re: Directive to answer to the People
We, the People's Oversight Commission on Stevens County, issue
this directive to answer to the people by affidavit or to appear in
person to testify under oath why you have not responded or
otherwise answered the People's charges that you:
1. Are in non-compliance with Washington state law!; and 2. Are
occupying an elective county office you have failed to dilly
qualify to possess2.
Please submit your sworn or affirmed affidavit properly
addressing the above charges no later than 72 hours from the date
of service of this Directive.
If you wish to testify under oath before this Commission, please
notify the Commission within 48 hours of service of this Directive,
at the address below, and a date that will accommodate the parties
shall be scheduled.
As an elected official you have a duty to answer to the people.
Failure to answer and provide facts, evidence and law that the
accusations levied against you are a misunderstanding by the People
or are wholly inaccurate as applied to the law will be your tacit
admission that the People's charges are true and correct.
Please govern yourself accordingly. 609:q.3iQ D3lQ~
ClA..JA.- Y'Y'\4.Q. : h~ I "N 1 Acrao4' I Chairman of the Board
of Oversight Commissioners Commissio er - Witness cc. file . I" ('
~-~---::~::_-----~--ll~
Commissioner - Witness
1 Referencing the Notice of Non-Compliance with State Law served
upon you on April 8, 2014. 2 Referencing the Notice of Vacancy of
Office served upon you on May 27, 2014.
People's Oversight Commission * P.O. Box 448 * Chewelah,
Washington 99109
(1QMc.t~i\ yr ~ '7 melil. C!oIY\
EXHIBIT 7
-
DECLARATION OF SERVICE
I, William-Benjamin Sr.; Klinger, do hereby state that on the
0ay of June, 2014, I did personally hand deliver one copy of the
following:
1. Re: Directive to answer to the People (one page)
upon Gina Tveit, occupying the office of District Court Judge or
his/her
representative identified as II S I-t Le 1 ' authorized to
receive service of process at q:A AM/~ at the Stevens County
Courthouse
,
Complex with physical address of 215 S. Oak, Colville, WA
99114.
The above identified and served document originated from the
People's Oversight Commission.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United
States
of America that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on June ) j1i;2014.
-
VENS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT STATE OF WASHINGTON
215 South Oak Street RE: STATE OF WASHINGTON Room 213
Colville, Washington 99114 .CITY OF , ) Telephone (509)
684-5249
vs.
Cause No. __----'--":--'--'--,...--'----=-----":-----' _
Violation Date: __--=--=---'-=-'----=----=::....::... _
Violation:
SUMMONS and
NOTICE OF CASE SETTING AVISO DE CASO SENALADO
THE ABOVE CAUSE HAS BEEN SET / CONTINUED TO THE DATE, TIME AND
LOCATION STATED
FAILURE TO APPEAR MAY RESULT IN THE ISSUANCE OF A WARRANT FOR
YOUR ARREST.
TIME: _~-,e...:....:.---='-=----------- ARRAIGNMENT' TRIAL
DATE __.:...:...:..._-:....:.....,,:----=--:
----'--..:..:.....:--'-'--_ SENTENCING ,. HEARING
COURTROOM: JUDGE:
---'--'-'--"'-'--'----:----'-----'--'''-'-'----=-'- _ See Reverse
COURT APPEARANCE IS MANDATORY.
__ COURT APPEARANCE IS MANDATORY UNLESS $ CASH BAIL IS POSTED.
YOU MAY FORFEIT BAIL BY YOUR NON-APPEARANCE.
ce. Pros. Atty.: _ Officer:
__-:-''-'':-,...-...:..:.....:.:..".:.--:....,.,..-'--'-,..:..:-:.'--.:".......
_ Defense Atty.: _ Bondsman: _ Probation: _
Deputy Clerk By:
_----':...::....,---=-"-'--'-'-_-=-_=:--:__-=..:.-"-"..:......:.::::....
-
-~TEVENS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT STATE OF WASHINGTON
215 South Oak Street RE: STATE OF WASHiNGTON Room 213
Colville, Washington 99114 CITYOF ()TTY OF CHEWELAH Telephone
(509) 684-5249 February 24, 2015
w. LA RUE, CONNIE
Cause No. 5Z0133878 HPD C'l' Violation Date: 02/02/20 15
LA RUE, CONNIE Violation:
VEH OPR-REFUSE COMPLY POLICE 1045 KITT NARCISSE COLVILLE WA
99114
RD SUMMONS and
NOTICE OF CASE SETTING AVISO DE CASO SENALADO
THE ABOVE CAUSE HAS BEEN SET / CONTINUED TO THE DATE, TIME AND
LOCATION STATED
FAILURE TO APPEAR MAY RESULT IN THE ISSUANCE OF A WARRANT FOR
YOUR ARREST.
TIME: 0 1 ; 30 PM ~RRAIGNMENT' TRIAL
DATE Mar rob 06 2010 SENTENCING HEARING
COURTROOM: 21 2 JUDGE: NI CKEL, LLOYD B 'See Reverse ----X--
COURT APPEARANCE IS MANDATORY.
COURT APPEARANCE is MANDATORY UNLESS $ CASH BAIL IS POSTED. YOU
MAY FORFEIT BAIL BY YOUR NON-APPEARANCE.
cc. Pros. Atty.: _
Officer: BOWERS, .IOHNATHAN I, Defense Atty.: _ Bondsman: _
Probation BJYRDERS, NADINE M BrrwJ
Deputy Clerk BMW
-
(
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE
COUNTY OF STEVENS
)c,'h of chefPeJ~ ))
5Z{)/33F7~ Is Z O/338'7jNO. IPlamtifffP8titioR8f )
) vs ) ORDER
Conn i e. L tL R~e..-- ) )
DefendantIRest'oftdeftt )
J 1. BASIS_De (.nda rn: moved the court for 0 t:d -br ()f 7
-
E IVE
:::; It:VH\J::i -::OUN 1\ ;';HOSFC' ITI"'1(:i ..1\TT'JRNt:Y
Washington State District Court
CITY OF CHEWELAH, Plaintiff [No. 5Z0133878]
v.
Connie LaRue, Abused Affidavit in Support of Recusal
Comes now, Connie LaRue, your Affiant, being competent to
testify after first being duly sworn on oath under penalty of
perjury, to bring a Motion to Recuse Gina Tveit under RCW 4.12.050.
Affiant states that she has first-hand knowledge of the facts
stated herein.
Affiant states that Gina Tveit has exhibited extreme prejudice
toward Affiant by:
1. Altering court recordings of two Probable Cause hearings. 2.
Ordering her clerk to issue a warrant for Affiant's arrest (for
Failure to Appear) when
Affiant was standing in front of Gina Tveit and was talking with
her and Gina Tveit had ordered Affiant out of the courtroom.
3. Refusing Affiant a phone call to get help for her two cats
and over 100 chickens. 4. Ordering Affiant to "book" into jail, and
when Affiant requested a copy of the "law requiring her
to book", Gina Tveit said, "I don't give legal advice." 5.
Telling Affiant that she was not allowed to challenge jurisdiction,
that Affiant could talk
about it later, and "later" never came. 6. Finding Probable
Cause in Affiant's case when the arrest situation was manufactured
by
the arresting policeman.
Further, Affiant sayeth naught.
All Rights Reserved
Connie LaRue, Affiant
Affidavit in Support of Recusal
-
JURAT
Washington State} Stevens County } ss.
. a Washington Notary Public, do certify that Connie LaRue is
the living woman who appeared before me, first duly sworn upon
oath, under penalty of perjury, and signed this instrument
acknowledging it to be her free and voluntary act for the purpose
mentioned in the instrument on this
the 1- day of'G\Uv\( Jo .2015.
Notary PubIic fo r
_\J\f---=--....:....:.."""""'-'--'-'--'--"T~....::....'-My
appointment eXPires~ --1-1 ~
Affidavit in Support of Recusal
')
-
FILEDRECEIVED FEB 23 2015
DISTRICT COURT STEVENS COUNT' STEVENS COUNTY, WA
PROSECUTING ATIORNEY
DISTRICT COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR STEVENS COUNTY
U\A e>f cMWEL~\\ Plainti
vs.
Defendant
Motion/Note for Hearing
(Clerk's action required) Hearing Date and Time: DATE: BCl'fC h
\ ~ I 20\5 TIME: I', ~~ I Stevens County istrict Court 215 S. Oak,
Rm 212, Colville WA
I certify/declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the
State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct.
Signed on this a~ day of ~~""'~'(120~at~\vJ\.t..,
S+~e.:n...~1.~.u~~ (Day) (Month) 1\ " _ \ ') (City, Coynty &
State) "l
I"'1-L 'fU\~~~ ""'~"(''JeoL ~\-;2.C>T-3~ ( ~ ,C'ffi)(IJ.' 0
l2\.L'-
Signature of Defendant
Motion and Note for Hearing
-
Washington State District Court ('f"\OV
CITY OF CHEWELAH, Plaintiff
v.
Connie LaRue, Abused
[No.5Z0133878j
Affidavit of Facts
ORIGINAL FILED
FEB 09 2015 DISTRICT COURT
STEVENS COUNTY WA
ol=rl=lVFD ~ ~,
Comes now Affiant, a real woman created by God, STEVENS COUNTY
PROSECUTING ATIORNEY
1. I was in Stevens County District Court at 13:25 today and
Gina Tveit walked in about 13:50. 2. Gina Tveit began calling names
of accused individuals and when my name was called I
responded with "I am here in regard to that matter." 3. Every
abused party was called and I was the last Abused in the courtroom.
The time was
roughly 15:20 hours and there were about twenty (20) witnesses
in the courtroom. 4. One of the prosecuting attorney women called
my name and I stood up to prepare to go up
front. 5. I removed the headset I had been using for hearing the
proceedings, because I am exceptionally
hard of hearing, and inserted my hearing aids. 6. As I was
adjusting my hearing aids, I heard someone behind the bar asking me
if I was going to
come up. 7. When my hearing aids were inserted 1 stated that the
prosecuting attorney had called the
names of the abused, and I asked if this was standard operating
procedure. 8. Gina Tveit said I was not allowed to talk from
outside the bar, and instructed me to pass through
the bar. 9. I asked if I would be recognized as a living woman
created by God, or as a PERSON. 10. There was no response to this
question. 11. I asked if Gina Tveit would recognize the fact that I
am not the surety, fiduciary or liable party.
She did not respond. 12. Gina Tveit said no one was there by the
name she called, and she ordered me to leave the court
room or to be removed by authorities.
I Connie LaRue swear under penalty of perjury the foregoing is
true;
-
510
15
20
25
30
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
11
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
21
22
23
24
26 27
28
29
DISTRICT COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF STEVENS
[X] CITY OF CHEWELAH Plaintiff,
No.5Z0133878
vs. RULE 3.2 HEARlNG ORDER CONNIE nlmli LARUE CONDITIONS OF
RELEASE DOB: 06/20/1948 Defendant [ JSUPERVISION ACTION
REQUIRED
THIS MATTER came before the court for a Rule 3.2 hearing. The
court orally informed the defendant:
(1) of the nature of the charge(s) against him/her, to wit: VEH
OPERATOR REFUSE TO COMPLY POLICE and (2) of his/her Constitutional
rights.
( ) The defendant requested the appointment of counsel to
represent himlher, and the court finds that defendant is
financially unable to obtain counsel without causing substantial
hardship to defendant or defendant's family. It is
therefore ORDERED that , a member of the bar, be
and is hereby appointed as attorney for the above named
defendant, pursuant to Criminal Rule 3.1 (d). ( ) The defendant is
being held on a warrant from which requires bail in the amount of $
. The defendant is remanded to custody pursuant to the terms and
conditions of the warrant and any additional conditions stated
herein.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-named defendant shall be
released from Stevens County Jail under this
cause number on the following conditions:
( ) On personal recognizance without conditions. (~The court,
having determined that release on defendant's personal recognizance
wilJ not reasonably assure the presence of the defendant when
required; and/or that there exists a substantial danger that the
defendant will commit a
serious crime, jeopardize the personal safety of the victim, or
of the defendant or that of others, or will unlawfully interfere
with the administration ofjustice, imposes the following conditions
of release:
~efendant shall be in the custody of_. _ Defendant shall post a
surety bond or cash in the sum of $_ . Said bond shall be:
( ) for appearance onl) .. Jr appearance and to guarantee
compliance with conditions of release.
STEVENS COUNTY PROSECUTTNG ATTORNEY 215 S. Oak Street, Room J
J4
Colville, WA 99 J J4 RULE 32 HEARfNG ORDER CONDITIONS OF RELEASE
- J (509) 684-7500 fax (509) 684-7589
-
510
15
20
25
30
Approved for entry:
~~ ~~~~od.II!loIoI~u..ul..~_ ~~~ ~\. der of the co .
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
11
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
21
22
23
24
26
27
28
29
( ) Defendant shall not approach or communicate with nor attempt
to approach or communicate with (by telephone, in writing, in
person, or in any other way) either directly, indirectly, or
through third parties, while in jailor after release, the following
individuals:
ADDRESS
( ) Defendant shall not go to the following premises/areas: _ (
) Pursuant to RCW 9.41.800 the defendant shall immediately
surrender all firearms and other dangerous weapons
within the defendant's possession or control and any concealed
pistol license to _
[name/law enforcement agency] and defendant is prohibited from
obtaining or possessing a firearm, other dangerous weapon or
concealed pistol license until further order of the court.
( ) Defendant shall not use or posses any drugs or alcohol
unless prescribed by a physician. ( ) Defendant shall, pursuant to
RCW 10.21.055:
[ ] have a functioning ignition interlock device installed on
all motor vehicles operated by the person, with proof of
installation filed with the court by the person or the certified
interlock provider within five business days of the date
of release from custody or as soon thereafter as determined by
the court based on availability within the jurisdiction; [ ] comply
with 24/7 sobriety program including 24/7 electronic alcohoVdrug
monitoring. (RCW 36.28A.330). [ lor both.
( ) Defendant shall submit to continuous alcohol monitoring via
SCRAM. ( ) Defendant shall to submit to a portable breath test upon
request of any law enforcement officer, the probation officer,
or the court.
( ) Defendant shall not drive without a valid operator's license
and insurance. (0Defendant shall commit no other criminal offenses.
( ) Defendant may go to the residence only in the company of law
enforcement officers to retrieve personal effects. (~efendant shall
appear at the Stevens County District Court on -.:=fw q I dO /5 at
/: .3f;p for
first appearance, arraignment andlor review for compliance with
the above release conditions.
(.I) Other: 1'(~o
-
510
15
20
25
30
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
11
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
21
22
23
24
26
27
28
29
DEFENDANT'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT
1. I have read or have had read to me all of the above
conditions of release and any other conditions of release that
may
be attached; 2. 1agree to follow the above conditions and
understand that any violation may lead to the forfeiture of any
bond posted
and to the issuance of a warrant for my immediate arrest, and
that I may be charged with a separate crime;
3. I understand that a law enforcement officer having probable
cause to believe that 1 have violated a condition of my
release, may arrest me and bring me immediately before the
court; 4. I understand that failure to appear when required by this
court is a crime punishable by up to five (5) years in the
state penitentiary;
5. I agree to notify the clerk of court of any change of
address, telephone, or employment; and
6, [ have 0' w;[[ ""Ive a oopy of thIs o,d" and w;[[ keep It
w~~/Ida
Dated: _
Address:
STEVENS COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY 215 S. Oak Street, Room
114
Colville, WA 99J 14 RULE 3.2 HEARING ORDER CONDITIONS OF RELEASE
- 3 (509) 684-7500 fax (509) 684-7589
-
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
FILED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON APR 1 6
2015
DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF STEVENS STEVENS COUNTY,
WA
No.5Z0133878 Plaintiff,
IZJ CITY/TOWN OF CHEWELAH MOTION AND ORDER
~ DISMISSING CHARGE(S) vs. [Z] DISMISSING 3.2 CONDITIONS ,
o DISMISSING DV NO-CONTACT ORDER o DISMISSING AH NO-CONTACT
ORDER
CONNIE LARUE, a/k/a Connie LaRue o EXONERATING OF BAIL Defendant
o DISMISSING DEFERRED SENTENCE
o DISMISSING DEFERRED PROSECUTION The [gJ Plaintiff 0 Defendant
0 Court moved for and the court finds good cause to
IZJ Dismiss the Charge(s) of Refusal to Give Information to or
Cooperate with Officer [gJ Dismiss the Conditions of release set
forth in the Rule 3.2 Hearing Order D Dismiss the Domestic Violence
No-Contact Order D Dismiss the Anti-harassment No-Contact Order D
Exonerate the Bail posted D Dismiss the Deferred Sentence ..J .. )
:.' D Dismiss the Deferred Prosecution . .
For the following reason(s): Pending Further ReVIew and
Determination RE: Venue/Jurisdiction
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that: [gJ The charge(s) are
dismissed D with prejudice ~ without prejudice IZJ All conditions
of release entered in the Rule 3.2 Hearing Order, and any
modifications or
supplements thereto, are hereby dismissed. o The Domestic
Violence No-Contact Order is hereby dismissed o The Anti-Harassment
No-Contact Order is hereby dismissed o Any bail/bond posted herein
shaJ.1 be exonerated. o The finding of guilt is withdrawn and the
cause is dismissed with prejudice. D The deferred prosecution
herein is terminated and the charge(s) of _ = against the Defendant
is dismissed with prejudice
D The Defendant forfeits any property interests in any evidence
seized. DATED this \G~ day of April, 2015.
. ; I ..l . / DefendantlDefe'ndant's Attorney
STEVENS COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY 215 S. Oak Street, Room
114
Colville, WA 99114 (509) 684-7500 fax (509) 684-7589
Reviewedc:nd"A
EXHIBIT 9
-
--------------
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
/1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
/9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IN THE DISTRlCT COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGT~~R. J 6 2015 TN
AND FOR THE COUNTY OF STEVENS ;'" DI~,! /--:ICT COURT
STEVEN;:; COUNTY, WA No. 520133879
Plaintiff, cg] CITY/TOWN OF CHEWELAH
MOTION AND ORDER ~ DISMISSING CHARGE(S)
vs. o DISMISSING 3.2 CONDITIONS o DISMISSING DV NO-CONTACT ORDER
o DISMISSING AH NO-CONTACT ORDER
CONNIE LARUE, a/k/a Connie LaRue D EXONERATING OF BAIL Defendant
D DISMISSING DEFERRED SENTENCE
D DISMISSING DEFERRED PROSECUTION The ~ Plaintiff 0 Defendant D
Court moved for and the court finds good cause to
k8J Dismiss the Charge(s) of Failure to Yield Right of Way to an
Authorized Emergency Vehicle and Failure to Renew Expired Vehicle
License Less than two (2) Months Old
o Dismiss the Conditions of release set forth in the Rule 3.2
Hearing Order o Dismiss the Domestic Violence No-Contact Order o
Dismiss the Anti-harassment No-Contact Order o Exonerate the Bail
posted
D Dismiss the Deferred Sentence D Dismiss the Deferred
Prosecution . .
For the following reason(s): Pending FurtherReview and
Determination RE: Venue/Jurisdiction
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that: [gJ The charge(s) are
dismissed D with prejudice k8J without prejudice 0 All conditions
ofreJease entered in the Rule 3.2 Hearing Order, and any
modifications or
supplements thereto, are hereby dismissed. D The Domestic
Violence No-Contact Order is hereby dismissed D The Anti-Harassment
No-Contact Order is hereby dismissed o Any baillbond posted herein
shaJJbe exonerated. o The finding of guilt is withdrawn and the
cause is dismissed with prejudice.D The deferred prosecution herein
is terminated and the charge(s) of= against the Defendant is
dismissed with prejudice o The Defendant forfeits any property
interests in any evidence seized. DATED this l~-t' day of April,
2015. . ~O
Judge/~ !pr-a-\cff\
# 44789
Reviewed and Approved br//7 (. ./ ~ ZG/ZEJ
ant's Attorney Jessica L. Taylor, WSB 36248/ Deputy Prosecuting
Attorney
STEVENS COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY 215 S. Oak Street, Room
114
Colville, WA 99114 (509) 684-7500 fax (509) 684-7589
-
-------
-------
0RI COPy STEVENS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT GINAL FILED
215 S OAK ROOM 213 MAY 0520'5 DfSTR ICOLVILLE, WA 99114 STEVEN
fCT CaUR
BUSN: 509-684-5249 FAX: 509-684-7571 TTY: 800-833-6388 I S
COUNTY, "c"4
NOTIFICATION OF INFRACTION Date Mailed: 4/24/2015
Name/Address NAY 0 t~ ?n- rCase No.: P7944 I v ._'J:]Connie
LaRue 1045 Kitt Narcisse Rd Amount Due: $1,062.00 . STEVENS
CCJUNTY
'JHOr'>Er'lJT' ' -'Date Due: 5/9/2015 i ,. ::-> oJ. hG
.6,'IORrJE'(Colville, WA 99114
A notice of traffic infraction has been issued to you by a law
enforcement officer and filed with this court.
To respond you must check one of the boxes below, sign your
name, and return this form to the ,court by 5/9/2015
1. 0 I choose to pay the penalty and have enclosed full payment
in the amount of $ 1,062.00
2. 0 J request a hearing to explain the circumstances. If you
agree that you committed the infraction but would like to explain
the circumstances, the court will notify you, in writing, of the
hearing date. You may not require witnesses to appear at the
hearing, but they may attend voluntarily.
3. 0 I request a hearing to contest this infraction. If you
believe you did not commit the infraction, you may request a
hearing, At the hearing, the state/city must prove by a
preponderance of the evidence (more likely than not) that you
committed the infraction. You may require witnesses, including the
officer who issued the notice, to appear at this hearing. The court
will notify you, in writing, of the,bearing date and how to request
that t"'itnesses be present. ' \. (' ~. 'Sa ~ No:t:1.tL cA In.\e\.\
.\0 J\.pr'.M ~ -\-k was\.\;I-.~teN\. S~le.:rt\.e c.o~ -\u( a If you
do not respond by 5/9/2015 , the court m\ist add an additional
penalty of $52.00 to the original ! bail. In addition, your driving
priviledge may be suspended until you have paid all the penalties
~equired ~ bylaw. ~'i~~()"""' l0".~ ,,~ WO~tA-tO"V\.J~~~ ot~ ~h.e~
0.-a~
, D"'I'ae.~ Rt-ul 1- \ \., .~
-
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING PO Box 9030. Olympia, Washington
98501-9030
06/09/2015 Notice of Suspension CERTIFIED
ABFf LA RUE,CONNIE 1045 KilT NARCISSE RD COLVILLE WA 99114-9711
. Lie. # LARUEC*527LO
On 07/24/2015 at 12:01 a.m. we will suspend your driving
privilege because you failed to respond, appear, pay, or comply
with the terms of the citation below:
Citation number Violation date Reason for Citation P00007944
02/0212015 Fail To Yield-Emgy Veh
What do I have to do? 1. Use the contact information below to
find out how to take care of this citation:
Stevens Co Dist Ct District Court 215 SOUTH OAK Colville WA
99114-2861 (509)684-524.9
2. Don't wait until the last minute. We must receive and process
proof that this citation has been resolved prior to your suspension
date. Processing can take 7-10 business days from the date we
receive it. Ask the court to notify us as soon as this matter is
resolved.
Will DOL notify my state of record? Washington State will notify
your state licensing department about this Washington suspension.
It is your responsibility to check with your state of record.
What happens if I don't resolve it? Your driving privilege will
be suspended and any Washington driver license or permit, including
occupational (ORL) or ignition interlock licenses (IlL), will not
be valid. Your license must be returned to Department of Licensing,
PO Box 9030, Olympia, WA 98507-9030. You will be charged a
nonrefundable reissue fee, along with other applicable fees, to get
your license back.
What other options are available? You can contest this action by
returning the enclosed form or a written request postmarked within
15 days from the date of this notice.
We suggest that you always check the status of your driving
privilege before you drive. Find out more at www.dol.wa.gov or by
calling Customer Service at 360-902-3900.
Driver Records Authority: RCW 46.20.289
The Department a/Licensing certifies that this document was
mailed via US post office on 0610912015 to the person named herein
at the address shown, which is the last address a/record with the
Department.
We are committed to providing equal access to our services.
Ifyou need accommodation, please call 360-902-3900 or TTY
360-664-0116.
52987085
EXHIBIT 11
-
414785
STEVENS COUNTY DISTRICT CO 215 S OAK ROOM 213
509-684-5249COLVILLE WA 99114
JuneS 2015
RE, FAIL TO YIELD TO EMERGENC CONNIE LARUE Case Number:
P00007944 SCS IT 1045 Kitt Narcisse Rd Violation Date: 06-05- 15
Colville WA 99114-9711 Balance Due: $ I I 14.00
DELINQUENCY NOTICE
YOU MUST PAY IN FULL WITHIN 30 DAYS OF MAILING.
Your account balance is past due and needs your immediate
attention. Ifpayment in full is not received within 30 days, your
account will be assigned to Armada Corp. and may be reported on
your credit bureau files. In addition, a collection fee will be
assessed pursuant to the provisions ofRCW 19.16.500. Depending on
your balance, the additional costs may range from 40% to 100% of
the current amount due.
Please remit the full amount owing. Ifyou have any questions
regarding your balance you may call 509-684-5249.
It is suggested that you pay with cashier's check or money order
as payment by personal check may cause delays in
processing/resolution of this account. Do not send cash.
USTED DEBE DE PAGAR LA DEUDA ENTERA DENTRO DE 30 DIAS DEPUES DE
QUE RECIBAN ESTA CARTA.
Su saldo de cuenta esta sobre pasada y necesita su atenci n
inmediata. Si el pago no es recibido dentro de 30 d as, su cuenta
ser asignada a Armada Corp. Y puedemos informales a sus archivos de
la oficina del cr dito. Adem s, un honorario de colecci n sera
argregara de acuerdo con la ley de RCW 19.16.500. Dependiendo con
su balance, los costos adicionales pueden recorrer de 40% a 100% de
la cantidad actual debida.
Remita por favor la cantidad que debe. Nota: Si usted ya tiene
un plan de pagos en existencia este nueva multa NO es incluida. Si
usted tiene cualquier pregunta sobre su cuenta 0 sobre su balance
por favor de llamar al 509-684-5249. Gracias.
Se Ie sugiere que page por cheque bancario 0 money order por la
razon que cheques personales pueden causar retrasos sobre el
procesos y resolucion en su cuenta. Por favor no manden dinero en
efectivo por coreo.
427-HWARMA01-252-1/06/10
*** Please detach the lower portion and return with your payment
-k*,.
Y18C5FBCD8
111111111111 11111111111 11111111111111111111 ""1111111111111 PO
Box 505 Linden MI 48451-0505 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED
Case #: Balance Due:
P00007944 SCS IT $1114.00
June 5 2015
II, ,'II I, I' 11'1 II 111 11 I' 'II II II'" I II II, 'I 'II,
I', ,"I" 111111 0008120024016525855799114971145-1YA1-Y18C5FBC08427
252 - 427
STEVENS COUNTY DISTRICT COCONNIE LARUE 215 S OAK ROOM 213 1045
Kitt Narcisse Rd COLVILLE WA 99114Colville WA 991 14-9711
EXHIBIT 12
-
07hCertified Fee Certified Fee r-'l 05 Postmark05 Postmark r-'l
o Retum Receipt Fee o Retum Receipt Fee Hereo (Endorsement
Required) Here ~ (Endorsement Required) ~--I~r-----io
~-----l~---J
Restricted Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee o (Endorsement
Required) o (Endorsement Required) I---ti-~----i o
~----'l+-,",,""--J 071231201507123/2015 o U1 Total
POSI'~-"-":"-'....LlI~---------'------------, U1 Total
Post:a-'--"--":......~"'--------------'-------
Postage $ $3 ~ 5 0714 $3.~5Postage $1-------------1
USE
rn Sent To State Of.Washington
: SentTo Office of di$~plinaryCounsel J~
-st-----t--Ap--CCommission on Judicial Conduct . _ -=t Washington
State Bar Association .---o ree, o Street, Apt. l' ~:,~~_~~~ P.O.
Box 1817 ' ~:_~~.~~! 1325 Fourth Avenue, Suite 600 .---C,ty,State
City, State,.
Olympia, WA 98507 a-.II:L~S:ea::t:tl~e,~WA98101-2539 .
-
7/28/2015 USPS.com - USPS Tracking
https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction?qtc_tLabels1=70113500000186255608
1/2
USPS TrackingCustomer Service
Have questions? We're here to help.
Get Easy Tracking Updates
Sign up for My USPS.
Track It
Track all your packages from a dashboard.
No tracking numbers necessary.
Manage Incoming Packages
Sign up for My USPS
Postal Product:
Priority Mail 2-Day Certified Mail Up to $50 insurance
includedRestrictions Apply
Features:
Product & Tracking Information
DATE & TIME STATUS OF ITEM LOCATION
July 27, 2015 , 12:21 pm Delivered OLYMPIA, WA 98501
Your item was delivered at 12:21 pm on July 27, 2015 in OLYMPIA,
WA 98501.
July 25, 2015 , 9:27 am Available for Pickup OLYMPIA, WA
98507
July 25, 2015 , 7:36 am Out for Delivery OLYMPIA, WA 98501
July 25, 2015 , 7:26 am Sorting Complete OLYMPIA, WA 98501
July 25, 2015 , 4:46 am Arrived at Unit OLYMPIA, WA 98501
July 25, 2015 , 2:15 am Departed USPS Facility FEDERAL WAY, WA
98003
July 24, 2015 , 6:24 pmArrived at USPS OriginFacility
FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003
July 24, 2015 , 4:15 am Departed USPS Facility SPOKANE, WA
99224
July 23, 2015 , 8:37 pmArrived at USPS OriginFacility
SPOKANE, WA 99224
July 23, 2015 , 5:05 pm Departed Post Office COLVILLE, WA
99114
July 23, 2015 , 3:12 pm Acceptance COLVILLE, WA 99114
Available Actions
Text Updates
Email Updates
Tracking Number: 70113500000186255608
Track Another PackageTracking (or receipt) number
Customer Serv ice USPS MobileEnglish Register / Sign In