-
�������� �������
Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 Regulates the Stress Activated
BilirubinOxidase Cytochrome P450 2A6
Hao Hu, Ting Yu, Satu Arpiainen, Matti A. Lang, Jukka Hakkola,
A’edahAbu-Bakar
PII: S0041-008X(15)30073-9DOI: doi:
10.1016/j.taap.2015.08.021Reference: YTAAP 13457
To appear in: Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
Received date: 11 August 2015Revised date: 31 August
2015Accepted date: 31 August 2015
Please cite this article as: Hu, Hao, Yu, Ting, Arpiainen, Satu,
Lang, Matti A., Hakkola,Jukka, Abu-Bakar, A’edah, Tumor Suppressor
Protein p53 Regulates the Stress Ac-tivated Bilirubin Oxidase
Cytochrome P450 2A6, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology(2015),
doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2015.08.021
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been
accepted for publication.As a service to our customers we are
providing this early version of the manuscript.The manuscript will
undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting
proofbefore it is published in its final form. Please note that
during the production processerrors may be discovered which could
affect the content, and all legal disclaimers thatapply to the
journal pertain.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2015.08.021http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2015.08.021
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 Regulates the Stress Activated
Bilirubin Oxidase
Cytochrome P450 2A6
Hao Hua, Ting Yu
a, Satu Arpiainen
b, Matti A. Lang
a, Jukka Hakkola
b,
and A’edah Abu-Bakara*
aThe University of Queensland, National Research Centre for
Environmental Toxicology
(Entox), 4072 Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
[email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected].
bInstitute of Biomedicine, Department of Pharmacology and
Toxicology and Medical
Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of
Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
[email protected]; [email protected].
aAddress correspondence to: A’edah Abu-Bakar, Entox, The
University of Queensland, 39
Kessels Road, Coopers Plains, 4108 Queensland, Australia. Phone:
+617 0419 301 740; Fax:
+617 3274 9003; E-mail: [email protected]
Abbreviations used: BaP, Benzo[α]pyrene; BR, bilirubin; CYP,
cytochrome P450; CYP2A5,
cytochrome P450 2A5; CYP2A6, cytochrome P450 2A6; HMOX1, heme
oxygenase-1; Nrf2,
nuclear factor erythroid 2-like 2; TF, transcription factor.
Running title: p53 regulates CYP2A6 gene
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
2
Abstract
Human cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2A6 enzyme has been proposed to play
a role in cellular
defence against chemical-induced oxidative stress. The encoding
gene is regulated by various
stress activated transcription factors. This paper demonstrates
that p53 is a novel
transcriptional regulator of the gene. Sequence analysis of the
CYP2A6 promoter revealed six
putative p53 binding sites in a 3 kb proximate promoter region.
The site closest to
transcription start site (TSS) is highly homologous with the p53
consensus sequence.
Transfection with various stepwise deletions of CYP2A6-5’-Luc
constructs—down to -160 bp
from the TSS—showed p53 responsiveness in p53 overexpressed C3A
cells. However, a
further deletion from -160 to -74 bp, including the putative p53
binding site, totally abolished
the p53 responsiveness. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay
with a probe containing the
putative binding site showed specific binding of p53. A point
mutation at the binding site
abolished both the binding and responsiveness of the recombinant
gene to p53. Up-regulation
of the endogenous p53 with benzo[α]pyrene—a well-known p53
activator—increased the
expression of the p53 responsive positive control and the
CYP2A6-5’-Luc construct
containing the intact p53 binding site but not the mutated
CYP2A6-5’-Luc construct. Finally,
inducibility of the native CYP2A6 gene by benzo[α]pyrene was
demonstrated by dose-
dependent increases in CYP2A6 mRNA and protein levels along with
increased p53 levels in
the nucleus. Collectively, the results indicate that p53 protein
is a regulator of the CYP2A6
gene in C3A cells and further support the putative
cytoprotective role of CYP2A6.
Keywords: CYP2A6, p53, oxidative stress, bilirubin oxidase,
bilirubin
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
3
Introduction
Human cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2A6 is a key enzyme responsible for
the metabolism
of nicotine and coumarin (review in Abu-Bakar et al., 2013). It
can also metabolically
activate tobacco-specific nitrosamines (Yamazaki et al., 1992).
The bile pigment bilirubin
(BR) has been suggested to be the endogenous substrate for
CYP2A6 (Abu- Bakar et al.,
2012). The enzyme is predominantly expressed in the liver and
commonly found in sex
steroid-responsive tissues such as breast, ovary, uterus,
testis, and adrenal gland (Nakajima et
al., 2006), lung, nasal mucosa, oesophagus, trachea and skin
(Janmohamed et al., 2001;
Koskela et al., 1999; Su et al., 1996).
The CYP2A6 expression is induced by structurally unrelated
chemicals that are toxic to
the liver, such as pyrazole, aminotriazole, griseofulvin and
cobalt chloride (Donato et al.,
2000). It is also induced in fatty, inflamed and cirrhotic liver
associated with microorganisms
infections and harmful alcohol consumption (Fisher et al., 2009;
Kirby et al., 1996; Niemela
et al., 2000; Raunio et al., 1998; Satarug et al., 1996). Given
the unrelated nature of the
inducers, it is probable that CYP2A6 induction is not directly
related to the nature of the
inducing agents, but instead a consequence of specific cellular
events associated with
exposure to the inducers. This is indeed reflected in the
complex regulation of CYP2A6,
where it is controlled transcriptionally and/or
post-transcriptionally, depending on the nature
of cellular perturbations (Christian et al., 2004; Raunio &
Rahnasto-Rilla, 2012).
The post-transcriptional regulation of CYP2A6 is mediated by the
interaction of
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 (hnRNP A1) with the
3’-UTR of the CYP2A6
mRNA and the transcript is stabilized when transcription is
impaired by Actinomycin D
(Christian et al., 2004). The up-regulation of CYP2A6 can also
be achieved by protein
stabilization (Abu-Bakar et al., 2012). This is demonstrated in
a study with HepG2 cells
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
4
where treatment with BR—an endogenous substrate for
CYP2A6—increased the half-life of
CYP2A6 protein but did not alter the CYP2A6 mRNA level
(Abu-Bakar et al., 2012).
The transactivation of CYP2A6 is regulated by transcription
factors (TFs) involved in
cellular homeostasis and cytoprotection. For example, TFs
implicated in bile acid/steroid
homeostasis and energy metabolism, such as pregnane-X-receptor
(PXR), peroxisome
proliferator-activated receptor ɤ coactivator 1α (PGC-1α) and
estrogen receptor α (ERα)
(Goodwin et al., 2003; Staudinger et al., 2001; Xie et al.,
2001) mediate upregulation of
CYP2A6 expression by interacting with the relevant response
elements in the distal promoter
of CYP2A6 (> -2400 bp) (Higashi et al., 2007; Itoh et al.,
2006).
Similarly, stress activated nuclear factor (erythroid-derived
2)-like 2 (Nrf2) mediates
transcriptional activation of CYP2A6 by direct interaction with
the antioxidant response
element (ARE) at position -1212 of the 5’-flanking region of the
gene (Yokota et al., 2011).
The study indicates a potential role for CYP2A6 in adaptive
response to cellular stress as
Nrf2 is a key regulator of stress responsive genes. This is in
agreement with the suggested
role of CYP2A6 in the regulation of intracellular antioxidant
capacity during oxidative stress
(Abu-Bakar et al., 2013; Muhsain et al., 2015).
Another key transcription factor in cellular defence regulation
is the tumor suppressor
protein, p53, which is activated by many cellular perturbations
to regulate the transcription of
various genes that encode products with pro-oxidant or
antioxidant functions (review in Saha
et al., 2015). Upon activation, p53 induces apoptosis to remove
severely damaged cells
(Zuckerman et al., 2009). If the damage is limited, p53 invokes
cell-cycle arrest to activate
DNA-repair pathways to correct the defects (Helton and Chen,
2007). A recent study
demonstrated that p53 not only functions to remove or fix
damaged cells but also regulates
antioxidant mechanisms to prevent cell death (Nam and Sabapathy,
2011). It does this by
directly upregulating transactivation of a stress responsive
gene heme oxygenase 1 (HMOX1).
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
5
Nam and Sabapathy (2011) demonstrated that p53-dependent HMOX1
expression was
specifically induced by oxidative stress, nitrosative stress,
hypoxia, and endoplasmic
reticulum stress but not by common chemotherapeutic DNA-damaging
agents. Based on
these findings and the fact that some of the p53 activators are
also inducers of CYP2A6, we
hypothesized that p53 could be involved in the regulation of
CYP2A6 gene.
In the present study we demonstrate that CYP2A6 is a direct
target gene of p53 and
describe the molecular mechanisms involved. The findings
describe a novel mechanism by
which unspecific cellular stress, such as DNA damage and
transcriptional arrest—triggers of
p53 activation—upregulated the CYP2A6.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and antibodies. Benzo[α]pyrene (BaP), DMSO, PBS,
dithiothreitol (DTT),
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), MgCl2, KCl, KOH, NaCl,
Hepes, EDTA, IGEPAL,
cyclohexanediamine tetraacetic acid, Triton X-100, p-coumaric
acid and luminol were
purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Sydney, NSW, Australia). Mouse
monoclonal anti-p53
antibody (sc-126), rabbit plyclonal anti-HNF4 (sc-8987) and
A-431 whole cell lysate (sc-
2201) were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Dallas,
Texas, USA). Mouse
monoclonal anti-CYP2A6 (ab56069) and anti-HMOX1 (ab13248), and
rabbit polyclonal anti
-β-actin (ab8227) were sourced from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Goat
anti-mouse and goat
anti-rabbit antibodies conjugated with horseradish-peroxidase
were from Thermo Fisher
Scientific Inc. (Melbourne, Victoria, Australia). All cell
culture consumables were sourced
from Invitrogen (Scoresby, Victoria, Australia).
Culturing and treatment of C3A cells. The C3A human
hepatocellular carcinoma cells
(ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) were propagated in T75 flasks in
William’s Medium E
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
6
containing 10% FBS, 1% Glutamax and 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin.
Human breast cancer
cell line, MCF-7, were grown in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium
supplemented with
10% FBS, 1% Glutamax and 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin. The cells
were maintained in a
humidifier incubator at 37°C in 5% CO2 and were subcultured at
least two times per week.
Cells with passage number between 5 and 15 were used in all
studies.
Plasmids and transient transfection assays. The CYP2A6
5’-flanking region -2901/+9 was
amplified from a human DNA sample using high-fidelity PCR
polymerase and cloned in
front of the luciferase cDNA in pGL3-basic vector (Promega,
Madison, WI). The 5’-
truncated fragments of the CYP2A6 promoter were produced by PCR
amplification using the
cloned longer construct as template. The primers used for the
amplification were listed in
Table 1. Promoter constructs were co-transfected with either the
human p53 expression
plasmid (pcDNA3-hp53) (Christian et al., 2008) or the empty
expression plasmid pcDNA3.
The pGL4.38[luc2P/p53 RE/Hygro] vector (Promega, Madison, WI)
was used as the positive
control for the luciferase activity assay.
Polyethylenimine (PEI) (Polysciences Inc., PA, USA) was used to
transiently transfect
cultured cells with the various promoter constructs. PEI stock
solution (1 μg/μl) was prepared
by dissolving 100 mg of PEI in 100 ml of sterilised water at
50°C and pH adjusted to 7 with
HCl. The solution was passed through a 0.22 μm filter
(Millipore, USA) and stored at -80°C.
The PEI solution was warmed up to room temperature before being
added to DNA plasmid
solution at DNA:PEI ratio of 1:2. The DNA-PEI mixture was then
incubated at room
temperature for 15 min before being added to each well of the
24-well plates.
Cells were seeded in 24-well plates (1.2 × 105 cells/well) for
24 h. Thereafter, the cells
were washed once in 500 µl PBS, followed by addition of 500 µl
of fresh FBS-free medium
to each well. The cells were then co-transfected with 0.1 µg of
pMAX-GFP (transfection
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
7
control), 0.1 µg of pcDNA3 or pcDNA3-hp53, and 0.3 µg of
CYP2A6-5’-Luc constructs.
The transfected cells were incubated for 24 h in a humidifier
incubator at 37°C in 5% CO2.
Thereafter, the luciferase activity was measured
(BriteliteTM
plus Reporter Gene Assay
System, PerkinElmer, USA). Transfection under each condition was
performed in quadruplet.
The fluorescent and luminescence signals were captured on a
FLUOstar Omega multimode
microplate reader with automatic gain settings.
BaP treatment of the transfected MCF-7 cells. Human breast
cancer MCF-7 cells were
seeded in 24-well plates at 1.2 × 105 cells/well and 100 mm
culture dish (Corning, USA) at 3
× 106 cells/well for 24 h. Cells in the 24-well plates were
co-transfected with pMAX-GFP
and pGL4.38[luc2P/p53 RE/Hygro] or CYP2A6-5’-Luc constructs at a
fixed DNA:PEI ratio
of 1:8. The amount of each plasmid used was 100 ng per well and
2.5 µg per dish. The cells
were transfected for 4 h before being treated with various
concentrations of BaP dissolved in
DMEM containing 10% charcoal stripped FBS, 1% Glutamax, 1%
Penicillin-Streptomycin,
and 0.1% DMSO. Twenty four hours after treatment luciferase
activity was measured and
nuclei protein extracted.
Isolation of nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins. Nuclear and
cytoplasmic extracts from
cultured cells were prepared as described previously (Abu-Bakar
et al., 2007). Briefly, 5 ×
106 cells in a 100 mm culture dish were washed and resuspended
in 5 ml cold PBS. The cell
suspension was centrifuged at 1600 x g for 10 min at 4oC. The
resulting pellet was
resuspended in 200 µl of buffer A (10 mM Hepes-KOH, pH 7.9, 1.5
mM MgCl2, 10 mM
KCl, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.2 mM PMSF, 10µg/ml leupeptine, 0.4% IGEPAL)
and kept on ice for 1
h. Thereafter, the cell suspension was vortexed, homogenized and
centrifuged at 12,000 x g
for 10 min at 4oC. The supernatant containing cytoplasmic
proteins was aliquoted and stored
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
8
at -80oC. The pellet containing nuclei was resuspended in 50 µl
of cold buffer B (20 mM
Hepes-KOH, pH 7.9, 25% glycerol, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 420 mM NaCl, 0.2
mM EDTA, 0.5 mM
DTT, 0.2 mM PMSF, 0.4% IGEPAL) and gently agitated with magnetic
stirrer for 30 min at
4oC. The suspension was homogenized and centrifuged at 15,000 x
g for 15 min, at 4
oC. The
supernatant containing nuclear proteins was diluted 1:1 with the
dilution buffer (20 mM
Hepes-KOH, pH 7.9, 15% glycerol, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.2mM
PMSF), aliquoted
and stored at -80oC.
Protein analysis. Protein concentrations of the subcellular
fractions were measured by the DC
protein assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA). The p53 protein
and CYP2A6 apoprotein
levels in the subcellular fractions were measured by Western
immunoblotting. In brief, 30 µg
of cytosolic or nuclei proteins were separated by 4%-15%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel (Bio-Rad
Laboratories, USA) electrophoresis. The proteins were
electrophoretically transferred on to a
Hybond ECL nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham Biosciences UK,
Ltd) and blocked
overnight in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20
(TBS-T) and 5% non-fat milk.
The membrane was then incubated with the relevant antibody
(1:500 dilution) for 2 h,
washed with TBS-T, and incubated for 1 h with horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-
mouse IgG (1:3000 dilution). After further washing with TBS-T,
the membrane was
incubated with luminol solution (1 M Tris pH 8.5, 90 mM
p-coumaric acid, 250 mM luminol,
and 3% H2O2) for 5 min and immunoreactive bands were visualized
and captured by the
ChemiDocTM
MP imaging system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA).
RNA extraction and mRNA analysis. Total cellular RNA was
extracted from C3A cells with
TRIzol reagent (Gibco, Australia) in accordance with the
manufacturer’s protocol. Total
RNA was treated with RNA-free DNAse prior to mRNA measurement by
quantitative real
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
9
time RT-PCR. One microgram of total RNA from the control and
treated C3A cells was used
to synthesise first-strand cDNA with the Invitrogen
SuperScript®
III First-Strand Synthesis kit
(Life Technologies, Vic, Australia). Two microliters of the cDNA
solution was used as
template in 20 µl PCR mixture containing 10 µl of the 2 X iQ
SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-
Rad Laboratories, USA) and 2 µl of each reverse and forward
primers (Table 1) (0.2 µM final
concentration). The PCR mixtures were incubated at 95oC for 3
min, followed by 40 cycles
of 95oC for 20 s and 63.2
oC (for CYP2A6 primers), 65.7
oC (for HMOX1 primers), or 60.4
oC
(for GAPDH primers) for 1 min in Corbett RotorGene 3000 (QIAGEN,
Germany). The
specificity of the PCR products was confirmed by melt curve
analysis and amplicon size
(2.5% agarose gel electrophoresis).
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Double-stranded
oligonucleotide corresponding to the -
149 to -55 (Probe 1) region of the 5’-flanking CYP2A6 promoter
were generated by
polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The probe was amplified by the
primer 1 and primer 2
(Table 1). The primers, double-stranded oligonucleotides of
putative and consensus p53RE
and of the -127 to -98 region of the 5’-flanking CYP2A6 promoter
(Probe 2) were obtained
from Sigma-Genosys (Sydney, Australia). The PCR product was
purified by using the QIA
quick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN, Germany) in accordance with
the manufacturer’s
protocol. The probes were labelled with digoxigenin on the 3’
end of the oligonucleotide
using DIG gel shift kit (Roche, Germany). Thereafter, 32 fmol/µl
of digoxigenin-labelled
probe was incubated with 16 µl of binding buffer and 4 µg of
nuclei protein—extracted from
C3A cells transfected with p53 expression plasmid—for 15 min at
room temperature. In
antibody shift assay, 1 µl of anti-p53, Nrf2 or HNF4 antibody
was added to the reaction
mixture and was incubated for 15 min. The samples were loaded to
a pre-electrophoresed,
non-denaturing 4-15% polyacrylamide gel in 0.5 × TBE buffer (44
mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 44
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
10
mM boric acid, 1 mM EDTA). Samples were separated
electrophoretically at 80V for 1 h and
transferred to a positive-charged nylon membrane Hybond-N
(Amersham Biosciences, UK,
Ltd) by an electro-blotting device (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA)
set at 1 h at 30V, 300mA.
Thereafter, the membrane was baked at 140oC for 15 min and
crosslinked in a UV
StratalinkerTM
1800 (Integrated Sciences, Australia) at 120 mJ. The membrane
was briefly
rinsed for 3 min in washing buffer and was blocked in blocking
solution for 30 min before
immunological detection. The digoxigenin-labelled probes on the
membrane were detected
by incubating the membrane with an anti-digoxigenin-AP antibody
(1:10,000). The
chemiluminescence signals of the labelled probes were captured
by ChemiDoc™ MP
imaging system after applying the alkaline phosphatase substrate
CSPD on the membrane.
Competition binding assay was performed to validate the
specificity of protein–DNA
interactions. In this assay, 125-fold molar excess of unlabelled
oligonucleotides was added to
the incubation mixture. The double-stranded consensus p53
oligonucleotide
5’AGACATGCCTAGACATGCCT 3’ (underlined bases are core sequence)
was used as
positive control for p53 specific binding.
Site directed Mutagenesis. The potential p53 sites on the
proximal CYP2A6 promoter was
analysed by site-directed mutagenesis. The core sequences of the
putative p53RE 5’-
ATTCATGGTGGGGCATGTAG-3’ (core sequences, bold) was mutated to
5’-
ATTACCAGTGGGGATCCTAG-3’ (mutated sequences, underlined) by the
two steps PCR.
The CYP2A6 construct from -250 to the p53RE mutated sites was
amplified from the
template plasmid CYP2A6 5’ -437/+9 by priming with the forward
primer CYP2A6 5’-250
FW and reverse primer CYP2A6-p53mut (Table 1). The CYP2A6
construct from p53RE
mutated site to +9 was amplified from the template plasmid
CYP2A6 5’ -437/+9 by priming
with the forward primer CYP2A6-p53mut and the reverse primer
CYP2A6 5’+9 NheI RV
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
11
(Table 1). Equal amount of PCR products from the two reactions
were mixed together, which
acted as a template to amplify the mutated p53RE. The
CYP2A6-160/+9 construct containing
the mutated p53RE was generated by priming with the forward
CYP2A6 5’ -160 KpnI FW
and the reverse primer CYP2A6 5’+9 NheI RV (Table 1). The p53RE
mutated CYP2A6
construct was ligated to the pGL3-basic plasmid. The validity of
the mutated p53RE on the
CYP2A6 5’ -160/+9 construct was confirmed by gene
sequencing.
Statistical analysis. Two group comparisons were analysed by
Student’s t test. Multiple
group comparisons were done with one-way analysis of variance
(ANOVA) followed by the
least significant difference post hoc test. Differences were
considered significant when p <
0.05.
Results
CYP2A6 putative p53REs are responsive to p53
Putative TF binding site search with ―MatInspector‖
(http://www.genomatix.de/)
revealed regions of the CYP2A6 promoter with high sequence
similarity with the 10 bp
consensus p53RE [5’-RRRC(A/T)(T/A)GYYY-3’], where ―R‖ represents
purine and ―Y‖
represents pyrimidine (el-Deiry et al., 1992). Five putative
distal sites were identified at
positions -2582, -2461, -2208, -1617, -1056, and one putative
proximal site at position -122
(Fig. 1A). We then tested p53 involvement in transcriptional
regulation of the CYP2A6 gene
by transiently transfecting C3A cells with luciferase reporter
plasmid containing either the
proximal (CYP2A6-5’-437/+9-Luc) or distal
(CYP2A6-5’-2901/+9-Luc) CYP2A6 promoter
region. The cells were co-transfected with p53 expression
plasmid (pcDNA3-hp53) or empty
control plasmid (pcDNA3). C3A cells were preferred over other
cell lines because p53
overexpression was the strongest in C3A compared with HepG2 and
MCF-7, and because it
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
12
was challenging to produce consistent induction of the
CYP2A6-Luc constructs in the HepG2
cells (Supplementary Figure1).
Figure 1B shows that the p53 protein levels in cells
co-transfected with the pcDNA3-
hp53 plasmid were significantly higher than in the control cells
(pcDNA3). The p53 co-
transfection induced the distal CYP2A6-5’-2901/+9-Luc construct
by ~4-fold relative to the
control, which is similar to the fold induction observed in the
positive control cells
(transfection with consensus p53RE-Luc construct) (Fig. 1C). The
induction was weaker with
the proximal CYP2A6-5’-437/+9-Luc construct, by about 2.4-fold
relative to the control (due
partly to the elevated control levels) (Fig. 1C). No significant
luciferase activity was observed
in cells transfected with the pGL3-basic plasmid (negative
control) (Fig. 1C). These
observations suggest that both the proximal and distal regions
of the CYP2A6 promoter are
responsive to p53.
We note that in normal cells—where p53 was not overexpressed
(opened bar)—the
luciferase activity of the distal promoter was significantly
weaker than that of the proximal
promoter (Fig 1C). For this reason and the fact that luciferase
activity of the proximal
promoter was almost equal to that of the positive control in p53
overexpressed cells, we
focused on describing the functionality of this site and its
significance in the regulation of the
CYP2A6 gene.
It is also noted that the activity of the distal promoter
(-2901-LUC construct) is
substantially lower than the vector control (p53RE-LUC) in both
normal and p53-
overexpressed cells. This suggests presence of suppressor
region(s) upstream the CYP2A6
promoter, which is confirmed by previous studies (Higashi et
al., 2007; Itoh et al., 2006;
Pitarque et al., 2005).
Proximal p53RE mediates p53 response of the CYP2A6 gene.
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
A series of 5’-truncated proximal CYP2A6 promoter-luciferase
reporter plasmids were
constructed and transfected into the C3A cells. The cells were
then co-transfected with p53
expression plasmid (pcDNA-hp53) or empty control plasmid
(pcDNA3). P53 co-transfection
up-regulated the CYP2A6-5’-437/+9-Luc construct 2.5-fold
relative to control (Fig. 2A). A
similar response was detected with the series of constructs
equal to or longer than -160 bp but
not with the shorter construct (-74 bp) (Fig. 2A). This suggests
that the p53RE is located in
the region from -160 to -74, which is in agreement with the
MatInspector TF binding site
search that revealed one putative p53RE at position -122 (Fig.
1A). This putative p53RE
contains the two copies of p53 binding core sequence of the
consensus p53RE, ―CATG‖ (Fig.
2B, bold letters), however, the satellite sequence of the
putative p53RE is different from that
of the consensus p53RE (Fig. 2B).
To establish the functional significance of the putative binding
site, we assessed the
luciferase expression after mutating the site, followed by
assessment of p53 binding activity
by way of electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA).
The core sequence, CATG, critical for p53 binding was mutated in
the -122 bp site of
the CYP2A6-5’-160/+9-Luc and CYP2A6-5’-2901/+9-Luc constructs to
ACCA. The mutant
constructs were then co-transfected with the p53 expression
plasmid into the C3A cells. As
expected, p53 co-transfection induced luciferase expression
driven by the two constructs by
about 2.6- to 3.9-fold relative to control (Fig. 2C). Point
mutation at the core binding
sequence dramatically reduced the p53 response of both the
proximal and distal promoter
activity (Fig. 2C), which suggests that the core binding
sequence within the putative p53RE
element at the -122 bp site is crucial in mediating the
response.
To confirm that the observed response was due to direct
interaction of p53 with the
putative site, EMSA was performed with nuclei fractions from C3A
cells transfected with
p53 expression plasmid using three oligonucleotide probes. Probe
1 is a longer
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
14
oligonucleotide containing the putative binding site from -149
to -55 bp (Fig. 3A). Probe 2 is
a shorter oligonucleotide spanning the putative site from -127
to -98 bp. The third probe
(Probe1Mut) is the longer oligonucleotide with the core
sequence, CATG, critical for p53
binding, mutated to ACCA.
As shown in Fig. 3B, the transfection produced a substantial
amount of p53 in the
nucleus. Two distinct DNA-protein complexes were formed when
Probe 1 was incubated
with the C3A nuclear extract (Fig. 3C, lane 2). The lower
complex (closed arrow) was super-
shifted with an anti-p53 antibody (Fig. 3C, lane 3), indicating
that the DNA-protein complex
contains p53. In the competitive assays, both complexes were
competed out by a 125-fold
excess of the unlabelled Probe 1 (S) (Fig. 3C, lane 4, closed
and opened arrows). However,
only the lower complex was competed out by increasing
concentrations of the unlabelled
consensus p53RE oligonucleotide (C) (Fig. 3C, lanes 5-7, closed
arrow). The results suggest
presence of p53 in the lower complex and indicate that a protein
other than p53 is forming the
higher complex (opened arrow) with Probe 1.
Indeed, detailed analysis of the probe sequence revealed a
putative binding site for
hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α (HNF4α) (Fig. 3A, opened line
square). Incubation with anti-
HNF4α antibody shifted the migration of the higher complex
(opened arrow) (Fig. 3C, lane
8), confirming the presence of HNF4α.
We included two other controls in the analysis to confirm
specific binding of p53 and
HNF4α. Migrations of the two complexes were not shifted by an
anti-Nrf2 antibody (Fig. 3C,
lane 9, closed and opened arrows) and the smaller complex was
not formed with the mutated
Probe 1 (Fig. 3C, lane 10). To further confirm p53 specific
binding, nuclei proteins were
incubated with the shorter Probe 2, which contains only the
putative p53 binding site. As
expected, only one DNA-protein complex was formed with Probe 2
(closed arrow) (Fig. 3C,
lane 12) and the migration of the complex (closed arrow) was
shifted by anti-p53 antibody
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
15
but not with anti-HNF4α antibody (Fig. 3C, lanes 13 & 14).
These observations strongly
indicate specific interaction of p53 with the putative site at
the proximal CYP2A6 promoter.
Collectively, the EMSA analysis and the luciferase reporter gene
assays demonstrate
that the proximal CYP2A6 gene promoter contains a functional
p53RE that potentially
mediates transcriptional regulation of the gene. The functional
p53RE appears to reside close
to the previously described HNF4α binding site (Pitarque et al.,
2005).
Endogenous p53 activates expression of CYP2A6
To demonstrate that endogenous p53 can mediate expression of the
CYP2A6-5’-
160/+9-Luc construct, as well as the transcriptional regulation
of native CYP2A6 gene, we
treated transfected MCF-7 and C3A cells with different
concentrations of BaP, a known
inducer of p53 (Biswal et al., 2003) for 24 h. BaP increased p53
protein levels in the nucleus
of MCF-7 by 4-fold relative to control (Fig. 4A&B).
Accordingly, BaP increased luciferase
activity dose-dependently in cells transfected with either
CYP2A6-5’-160/+9-Luc construct or
reporter construct containing the consensus p53RE
(pGL4.38-p53RE) (Fig. 4C). The
response was totally abolished when the two copies of the CYP2A6
p53RE core sequence
were mutated (pCYP2A6-5’-160/+9_p53mut-Luc) (Fig. 4C). These
observations align with
the results shown in Fig. 2C and Fig. 3, and indicate that the
proximal CYP2A6 p53RE is
responsive to induced endogenous p53.
It is unlikely that the induced luciferase activity was mediated
by HNF4α as its level
remained constant after BaP treatment (Fig. 4A&B). This is
in agreement with previous
observation that HNF4α regulates basal expression of CYP2A6
(Pitarque et al., 2005), and
corresponds with our observation of constant luciferase activity
in cells transfected with
pCYP2A6-5’-160/+9_p53mut-Luc (Fig. 4C, closed triangle), where
the HNF4α binding site is
intact.
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
16
Finally, BaP induced p53 dose-dependently in the nucleus of
hepatocellular carcinoma
cells (C3A) by 4-fold relative to control (Fig. 5A&C). This
confirmed previous observations
of BaP-dependent induction of p53 at mRNA and protein levels in
human lung
adenocarcinoma (A549), mouse hepatoma (Hepa-1c1c7) and
fibroblast (NIG3T3) cell lines,
as well as in mouse skin (Huang et al., 2012; Pei et al., 1999;
Serpi & Vähäkangas, 2003).
Importantly, recent investigation reported that BaP-induced
CYP1A1 expression was
regulated through p53 binding to a p53 response element in the
CYP1A1 promoter region
(Wohak et al., 2014).
It is noted that p53 induction by BaP aligned with
dose-dependent increased of the
CYP2A6 mRNA and apoprotein ranging from 2 to 4-fold relative to
control (Fig. 5). Similar
pattern of HMOX1 induction at mRNA and protein levels (another
p53 target gene) was also
observed (Fig. 5). This confirmed previous observations of
BaP-dependent induction of
HMOX1 expression in various human cell lines (Lee et al., 2009;
Spink et al., 2002).
These results together with our transfection data suggest that
p53 mediates
transcriptional activation of CYP2A6. The fact that p53
responsiveness was observed in three
different cell lines (Suppl. Fig. 1) suggests that p53-dependent
regulation of CYP2A6 is not
cell specific.
Discussion
In the present study, we have for the first time demonstrated
that the tumor suppressor
protein, p53, is a regulator of the CYP2A6 gene. The finding
provides novel insights into the
complex regulation of CYP2A6 in response to cellular
perturbations. It is not entirely
surprising that p53 is a regulator of the CYP2A6 because the
gene is known to be upregulated
by conditions that commonly activate p53 (Abu-Bakar et al.,
2013).
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
17
The presence of several putative p53REs on the CYP2A6 promoter
suggests that p53 is
an important regulator for the gene. However, the sequence
similarity of the five putative
p53REs at the distal CYP2A6 promoter with the consensus p53RE is
not as high as that of the
proximal CYP2A6 p53RE. The functional significance of the distal
sites in regulating
CYP2A6 expression is still obscured but our present observations
supported by published data
suggest a role for negative regulation. For instance, the basal
expression of the distal CYP2A6
promoter was significantly weaker than that of the proximal
promoter (Fig 1C), which is in
accordance with previous findings of potential suppressor
region(s) upstream the CYP2A6
promoter (Higashi et al., 2007; Itoh et al., 2006; Pitarque et
al., 2005). This region (up to -
2901) also contains functional Nrf2 binding sites (Yokota et
al., 2011). Importantly, previous
investigations have demonstrated direct interaction of p53 with
Nrf2 response elements in
suppressive regulation of stress responding genes including the
Phase II metabolizing genes,
NQO1 and GST-1 (Faraonio et al., 2006; Wakabayashi et al.,
2010).
It is thus plausible that interplay between p53 and Nrf2 at the
distal promoter mediates
suppression of CYP2A6 activation. Indeed, our preliminary
observations in C3A cells
indicated that overexpression of Nrf2 substantially supressed
the p53-mediated response of
the distal CYP2A6 promoter (manuscript in preparation), which
contains a functional Nrf2
binding site in close proximity with one of the putative p53REs.
Inevitably, further work is
warranted to confirm and understand in detail the possible
Nrf2/p53 interaction on the
CYP2A6 promoter and to investigate the functional significance
of such interaction in
CYP2A6 regulation, especially in the context of cellular
perturbations.
Our present data clearly shows that the putative p53RE at
position -122 is crucial for
the p53-dependent activation of the CYP2A6 because mutation of
the core sequence of this
site negated the activities of both proximal and distal
promoters (Fig. 2C). Additionally,
DNA-protein complex was not formed in gel shift assay with
mutated p53RE probe (Fig. 3C,
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
18
lane 10). Furthermore, BaP, a transcriptional activator of p53
(Huang et al., 2012; Pei et al.,
1999), increased the proximal promoter (CYP2A6-5’-160/+9-Luc)
activity dose-dependently,
which is associated with dose-dependent increased of p53 protein
(Fig. 4). The promoter
activity induction was abolished when the p53RE at position -122
was mutated, i.e., the
activity was maintained at basal level (Fig. 4C, closed
triangle). It has been reported that the
basal expression of CYP2A6 is governed by interplay between the
transcription factors
HNF4α, C/EBP α, C/EBPβ, and Oct-1 (Pitarque et al., 2005). The
functional response
elements for these transcription factors reside within the
proximal promoter, spanning from -
112 to -61 (Fig. 1A). Thus, the plausibility of p53 interacting
with some or all of these
transcription factors in mediating transactivation of CYP2A6
cannot be ruled out by our
present study and worthy of further investigation.
We note that p53 also regulates other hepatic CYP genes involved
in various metabolic
pathways (Goldstein et al., 2013; Wohak et al., 2014). Eleven
members from five different
CYP subfamilies were induced by p53 (Goldstein et al., 2013).
These include CYP4Fs and
CYP19A1, enzymes that metabolize lipids and sex steroids,
respectively (Goldstein et al.,
2013); and CYP21A2, a catalyst of glucocorticoid synthesis
(Goldstein et al., 2013). These
findings aligned with recent advancement in p53 research that
acknowledges a critical role
for p53 in regulating metabolism and maintaining cellular
homeostasis (reviewed in Meek,
2015). Additionally, p53 role in regulating drug metabolism was
recognised in a recent work
demonstrating direct p53 interaction on the p53REs of the CYP3A4
promoter, leading to
transactivation of the gene (Goldstein et al., 2013). The
p53-dependent activation of CYP3A4
activity, the main enzyme responsible for clearing
chemotherapeutics, was heightened
following a chemotherapeutic stimulus (Goldstein et al., 2013).
This observation indicates a
systemic role for p53 in response to chemotherapy.
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
19
As CYP2A6 is not a major drug metabolizing enzyme, what is the
physiological
significance of p53-mediated transactivation of CYP2A6? At
present, we have no conclusive
explanation. However, as p53 plays an important role in
maintaining cellular homeostasis
(Meek, 2015), our findings—along with our previous observation
that CYP2A6 efficiently
oxidizes bilirubin (BR) to a less toxic biliverdin (Abu-Bakar et
al., 2012)—indicate a
potential role for the CYP2A6/p53 pathway in regulating
bilirubin homeostasis maintenance.
Furthermore, the observation that BaP—a carcinogen and
transactivator of p53 (Pei et
al., 1999)—concurrently induced CYP2A6 and HMOX1 expression
(Fig. 5) suggests a
potential role for CYP2A6 in cellular stress management. HMOX1
catalyses heme
breakdown to biliverdin (BV), which is reduced to BR by
biliverdin reductase. Bilirubin is an
efficient scavenger of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species
(Jansen et al., 2010; Liu et al.,
2003), but apoptotic at highly elevated concentrations
(Rodrigues et al., 2002). Hence,
activation of HMOX1 by p53 may lead to drastic elevation of BR
concentration, which in
turn, may overwhelm BR oxidant scavenging activity.
Consequently, there is a need for a
protective mechanism where BR is enzymatically oxidized to BV to
curb its cytotoxicity, and
to be reduced back to BR by biliverdin reductase when needed.
CYP2A6 is potentially a good
BR oxidase candidate under this condition as the Km for BR is
within the subtoxic range
(Abu-Bakar et al., 2012).
Importantly, the proposition of CYP2A6 role in regulating BR
homeostasis during
chemical onslaught is further supported by a recent finding that
BR elimination through
conjugation was not elevated during the initial stage of
cellular stress (Muhsain et al., 2015).
Thus, transcriptional activation of CYP2A6 gene through p53 may
function as a part of the
cellular protection to re-establish BR homeostasis.
We conclude that the novel findings presented in this paper
implied important role for
p53-mediated CYP2A6 and HMOX1 activation in regulating hepatic
BR homeostasis. Given
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
20
the dual role of p53 in cytoprotection and apoptosis (Bensaad
and Vousden, 2007), and the
antioxidant and pro-apoptotic effects of BR (Jansen et al.,
2010; Liu et al., 2003; Ollinger et
al., 2007), it is of fundamental interest to understand how
these seemingly contradictory
events are related to the regulation of CYP2A6 and HMOX1. In
this regard the possible
interaction of Nrf2 and p53 in the regulation of CYP2A6 and
HMOX1 might prove to be
critical as has been shown for some other stress responsive
genes (Faraonio et al., 2006;
Wakabayashi et al., 2010). Understanding the molecular
mechanisms of this interaction is the
main focus of our current research.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in
this work.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Professor Greg Monteith,
Pharmacy Australia Centre of
Excellence, University of Queensland, for the provision of the
MCF-7 cells. This work was
supported by the Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination
and Remediation of the
Environment (CRC-CARE), Australia [2.1.04.11/12] and the
University of Queensland Early
Career Researcher Grants Scheme [UQECR2013002328]. HH is a
recipient of the CRC-
CARE PhD scholarship [2.1.04.11/12]. The National Research
Centre for Environmental
Toxicology is a partnership between Queensland Health and the
University of Queensland.
References
Abu-Bakar, A., Arthur, D.M., Wikman, A.S., Rahnasto, M.,
Juvonen, R.O., Vepsalainen, J.,
Raunio, H., Ng, J.C., Lang, M.A., 2012. Metabolism of bilirubin
by human cytochrome
P450 2A6. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 261, 50-58.
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
21
Abu-Bakar, A., Hakkola, J., Juvonen, R., Rahnasto-Rilla, M.,
Raunio, H., Lang, M.A., 2013.
Function and regulation of the Cyp2a5/CYP2A6 genes in response
to toxic insults in the
liver. Curr. Drug Metab. 14, 137-150.
Abu-Bakar, A., Lämsä, V., Arpiainen, A., Moore, M.R., Lang, M.,
Hakkola, J., 2007.
Regulation of Cyp2a5 gene by the transcription factor nuclear
factor (erythroid-derived
2)-like 2. Drug Metab. Dispos. 35, 787-794.
Bensaad, K., Vousden, K.H., 2007. p53: new roles in metabolism.
TRENDS Cell Biol. 17,
286-291.
Biswal, S., Maxwell, T., Rangasamy, T., Kehrer, J.P., 2003.
Modulation of benzo[α]pyrene-
induced p53 DNA activity by acrolein. Carcinogenesis. 24,
1401-1406.
Christian, K., Lang, M., Maurel, P., Raffalli-Mathieu, F., 2004.
Interaction of heterogeneous
nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 with cytochrome P450 2A6 mRNA:
implications for post-
transcriptional regulation of the CYP2A6 gene. Mol. Pharmacol.
65, 1405-1414.
Christian, K.J., Lang, M.A., Raffalli-Mathieu, F., 2008.
Interaction of heterogenous nuclear
ribonucleoprotein C1/C2 with a novel cis-regulatory element
wihtin p53 mRNA as a
response to cytostatic drug treatment. Mol Pharmacol. 73,
1558-1567.
Donato, M.T., Vititala, P., Rodriguez-Anotona, C., Lindfors, A.,
Castell, J.V., Raunio, H.,
Gomez-Lechon, M.J., Pelkonen, O., 2000. Cyp2a5/CYP2A6 expression
in mouse and
human hepatocytes treated with various in vivo inducers. Drug
Metab. Dispos. 28, 1321-
1326.
el-Deiry, W.S., Kern, S.E., Pietenpol, J.A., Kinzler, K.W.,
Vogelstein, B., 1992. Definition of
a consensus binding site for p53. Nat. Genet. 1, 45-49.
Faraonio, R., Vergara, P., Di Marzo, D., Pierantoni, G.M.,
Napolitano, M., Russo, T.,
Cimino, F., 2006. P53 supresses the Nrf2-dependent transcription
of antioxidant response
genes. J. Biol. Chem. 52, 39776-39784.
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
22
Fisher, C.D., Lickteig, A.J., Augustine, L.M., Ranger-Moore, J.,
Jackson, J.P., Ferguson,
S.S., Cherrington, N.J., 2009. Hepatic cytochrome P450 enzyme
alterations in humans
with progressive stages of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Drug Metab. Dispos. 37,
2087-2094.
Goldstein, I., Rivlin, N., Shoshana, O.Y., Ezra, O., Madar, S.,
Goldfinger, N., Rotter, V.,
2013. Chemotherapeutic agents induce the expression and activity
of their clearing
enzyme CYP3A4 by activating p53. Carcinogenesis 34, 190-198.
Goodwin, B., Gauthier, K.C., Umetani, M., Watson, M.A.,
Lochansky, M.I., Collins, J.L.,
Leitersdorf, E., Mangelsdorf, D.J., Kliewer, S.A., Repa, J.J.,
2003. Identification of bile
acid precursors as endogenous ligands for the nuclear xenobiotic
pregnane X receptor.
PNAS. 100, 223-228.
Helton, E.S., Chen, X. (2007). p53 modulation of the DNA damage
response. J. Cell.
Biochem. 100, 883-896.
Higashi, E., Fukami T., Itoh, M., Kyo, S., Inoue, M., Yokoi, T.,
Nakajima, M., 2007. Human
CYP2A6 is induced by estrogen vis estrogen receptor. Drug Metab.
Dispos. 35, 1935-
1941.
Huang, M.C., Chen, F.Y., Chou, M.T., Su, J.G.J., 2012.
Fluoranthene enhances p53
expression and decreases mutagenesisi induced by benzo[α]pyrene.
Toxicol. Letts. 208,
214-224.
Itoh, M., Nakajima, M., Higashi, E., Yoshida, R., Nagata, K.,
Yamazoe, Y., Yokoi, T., 2006.
Induction of human CYP2A6 is mediated by the pregnane X receptor
with peroxisome
proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator 1α. J. Pharmacol.
Exp. Ther. 319, 693-702.
Janmohamed, A., Dolphin, C.T., Phillips, I.R., Shephard, E.A.,
2001. Quantification and
cellular localization of expression in human skin of genes
encoding flavin-containing
monooxygenases and cytochromes P450. Biochem. Pharmacol. 62,
777-786.
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
23
Jansen, T., Hortmann, M., Oelze, M., Opitz, B., Steven, S.,
Schell, R., Knorr, M., Karbach,
S., Schuhmacher, S., Wenzel, P., Munzel, T., Daiber, A., 2010.
Conversion of biliverdin
to bilirubin by biliverdin reductase contributes to endothelial
cell protection by heme
oxygenase-1-evidence for direct and indirect antioxidant actions
of bilirubin. J. Mol.
Cell. Cardiol. 49, 186-195.
Kansanen, E., Kuosmanen, S.M., Leinonen, H., Levonen, A.L.,
2013. The Keap1-Nrf2
pathway: Mechanisms of activation and dysregulation in cancer.
Redox Biol. 1, 45-49.
Kirby, G.M., Batist, G., Alpert, L., Lamoureux, E., Cameron,
R.G., Alaoui-Jamali, M.A.,
1996. Overexpression of cytochrome P-450 isoforms involved in
aflatoxin B1 activation
in human liver with cirrhosis and hepatitis. Toxicol. Pathol.
24, 458-467.
Koskela, S., Hakkola, J., Hukkanen, J., Pelkonen, O., Sorri, M.,
Saranen, A., Anttila, S.,
Fernandez-Salguero, P., Gonzalez, F., Raunio, H., 1999.
Expression of CYP2A genes in
human liver and extrahepatic tissue. Biochem. Pharmacol. 57,
1407-1413.
Lee, S.H., Lee, S.E., Ahn, H.J., Park, C.S., Cho, J.J., Park,
Y.S., 2009. Identification of
atherosclerosis related gene expression profiles by treatment of
benzo(a)pyrene in human
umbilical vein endothelial cells. Mol. Cell. Toxicol. 5,
113-119.
Liu, Y., Zhu, B., Wang, X., Luo, L., Li, P., Paty, D.W.,
Cynader, M.S., 2003. Bilirubin as a
potent antioxidant suppresses expereimental autoimmune
encephalomyelitis:
implications for the role of oxidative stress in the development
of multiple sclerosis. J.
Neuroimmunol. 139, 27-35.
Meek, D.W., 2015. Regulation of the p53 and its relationship to
cancer. Biochem. J. 469,
325-346.
Muhsain, S.N.F., Lang, M.A., Abu-Bakar, A., 2015. Mitochondrial
targeting of bilirubin
regulatory enzymes: An adaptive response to oxidative stress.
Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.
282, 77-89.
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
24
Nakajima, M., Itoh, M., Sakai, H., Fukami, T., Katoh, M.,
Yamazaki, H., Kadlubar, F.F.,
Imaoka, S., Funae, Y., Yokoi, T., 2006. CYP2A13 expressed in
human bladder
metabolically activates 4-aminobiphenyl. Int. J. Cancer. 119,
2520–2526.
Nam, S.Y., Sabapathy, K., 2011. p53 promotes cellular survival
in a context-dependent
manner by directly inducing the expression of heme oxygenase 1.
Oncogene 30, 4476-
4486.
Niemela, O., Parkkila, S., Juvenon, R.O., Viitala, K., Gelbion,
H.V., Pasanen, M., 2000.
Cytochromes P450 2A6, 2E1, and 3A and production of
protein-aldehyde adducts in the
liver of patients with alcoholic and non-alcoholic liver
diseases. J. Hepatol. 33, 893-901.
Ollinger, R., Kogler, P., Troppmair, J., Hermann, M., Wurm, M.,
Drasche, A., Konigsrainer,
I., Amberger, A., Weiss, H., Ofner, D., Bach, F.H., Margreiter,
R., 2007. Bilirubin
inhibits tumor cell growth via activation of ERK. Cell Cycle. 6,
3078-3085.
Pei, X.H., Nakanishi, Y., Takayama, K., Bai, F., Hara, N., 1999.
Benzo[a]pyrene activates
the human p53 gene through induction of nuclear factor β
activity. J. Biol. Chem. 274,
35240-35246.
Pitarque, M., Rodríguez-Antona, C., Oscarson, M.,
Ingelman-Sundberg, M., 2005.
Transcriptional regulation of the human CYP2A6 gene. J.
Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 313,
814-822.
Raunio, H., Juvenon, R., Pasanen, M., Pelkonen, O., Paakko, P.,
Soini, Y., 1998. Cytochrome
P4502A6 (CYP2A6) expression in human hepatocellular carcinoma.
Hepatology. 27,
427-432.
Raunio, H, and Rahnasto-Rilla, M., 2012. CYP2A6: genetics,
structure, regulation, and
function. Drug Metab. Drug Interact. 27, 73-88.
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
25
Rodrigues, C.M., Sola, S., Brito, M.A., Brites, D., Moura, J.J.,
2002. Bilirubin directly
disrupts membrane lipid polarity and fluidity, protein order,
and redox status in rat
mitochondria. J. Hepatol. 36, 335-341.
Saha, T., Kar, R.K., Sa, G., 2015. Structural and sequential
context of p53: A review of
experimental and theoretical evidence. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.
Article in press.
doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2014.12.002, 1-14.
Satarug, S., Lang, M.A., Yongvanit, P., Sithithaworn, P.,
Mairiang, E., Mairiang, P.,
Pelkonen, P., Bartsch, H., Haswell-Elkins, M.R., 1996. Induction
of cytochrome P450
2A6 expression in humans by the carcinogenic parasite infection,
Opisthorchiasis
Viverrini. Cancer Epi. Biomark. Prev. 5, 795-800.
Serpi, R., and Vähäkangas, K., 2003. Benzo(a)pyrene-induced
changes in p53 and related
proteins in mouse skin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 92, 242-245.
Spink, D.C., Katz, B.H., Hussain, M.M., Spink, B.C., Wu, S.J.,
Liu, N., Pause, R., Kaminsky,
L.S., 2002. Induction of CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 in T-47D human breasy
cancer cells by
benzo(a)pyrene is diminished by arsenite. Drug Metab. Dispos.
30, 262-269.
Staudinger, J.L., Goodwin, B., Jones, S.A., Hawkins-Brown, D.,
MacKenzie, K.I., LaTour,
A., Liu, Y., Klaassen, C.D., Brown, K.K., Reinhard, J., Willson,
T.M., Koller, B.H.,
Kliewer, S.A., 2001. The nuclear receptor PXR is a lithocholic
acid sensor that protects
against liver toxicity. PNAS. 98, 3369-3374.
Su, T., Sheng, J.J., Lipinskas, T.W., Ding, X., 1996. Expression
of CYP2A genes in rodent
and human nasal mucosa. Drug Metab. Dispos. 24, 884-890.
Wohak, L.E., Krais, A.M., Kucab, J.E., Stertmann, J., Øvrebø,
S., Seidel, A., Phillips, D.H.,
Arlt, V.M., 2014. Carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
induce CYP1A1 in
human cells via a p53-dependent mechanism. Arch. Toxicol. [Epub
ahead of print] DOI
10.1007/s00204-014-1409-1.
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
26
Xie, W., Radominska-Pandya, A., Shi, Y., Simon, C.M., Nelson,
M.C., Ong, E.S., Waxman,
D.J., Evans, R.M., 2001. An essential role for nuclear receptor
SXR/PXR in detoxication
of cholestatic bile acids. PNAS. 98, 3375-3380.
Yamazaki, H., Inui, Y., Yun, C.H., Guengerich, F.P., Shimada,
T., 1992. Cytochrome P450
2E1 and 2A6 enzymes as major catalysts for metabolic activation
of N-
nitrosodialkylamines and tobacco-related nitrosamine in human
liver microsomes.
Carcinogenesis. 13, 1789–1794.
Yokota, S., Higashi, E., Fukami, T., Yokoi, T., Nakajima, M.,
2011. Human CYP2A6 is
regulated by nuclear factor-erythroid 2 related factor 2.
Biochem. Pharmacol. 81, 289-
294.
Zuckerman, V., Wolyniec, K., Sionov, R.V., Haupt, S., Haupt, Y.,
2009. Tumour suppression
by p53: the importance of apoptosis and cellular senescence. J.
Pathol. 219, 3-15.
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
27
Figure legends
Figure 1: Putative p53REs at the CYP2A6 promoter and effect of
p53 co-transfection on
CYP2A6-5’-Luc construct activities in C3A cells. (A) A schematic
representation of the 2.9
kb CYP2A6 promoter region indicating the putative p53RE sites.
The region spanning -112 to
-61 contains overlapping response elements for DR-4, C/EBP,
C/EBPβ, Oct-1, and HNF4
(Pitarque et al., 2005). (B) The six putative p53 binding sites
identified by MatInspector
(http://www.genomatix.de/) and the p53 consensus sequence.
Putative p53RE core sequences
are shown in bold. R = purine; Y = pyrimidine. (C) Western blot
and densitometry of p53
and β-actin (loading control) in C3A cells transfected with p53
expression plasmid (pcDNA-
hp53) and empty expression plasmid (pcDNA3). Each transfection
was done in triplicate.
Positive controls (+) = A-431 whole cell lysate for p53 and
β-actin peptide. Relative p53
expression (bar graph) = the intensity of p53 band relative to
the intensity of β-actin band. (D)
Effect of p53 co-transfection (pcDNA-hp53) on CYP2A6 distal and
proximal driven
luciferase activities. The firefly luciferase activities were
measured 24 h after transfection.
The measured activites were normalized against pMAX-GFP activity
(transfection control
plasmid). The values (n = 3) represent means ± S.D. p53 response
of each reporter construct
is indicated by -fold of activity to control co-transfection
with pcDNA3. Mean difference is
significant from control group at ***, p < 0.0005; **, p <
0.005; *, p < 0.05 (Student’s t test).
Figure 2: Functionality test of the p53RE site on the proximal
CYP2A6 promoter. (A) C3A
cells were co-transfeceted with a series of 5’-truncated
proximal CYP2A6 promoter-luciferase
reporter plasmids and p53 expression plasmid (pcDNA3-hp53) or
empty expression plasmid
(pcDNA3). (B) The difference between putative and the consensus
p53RE sequence. The
boxed region contains the p53 binding core sequence. (C) Effect
of p53 co-transfection on the
mutated and wildtype CYP2A6 proximal and distal promoters
activities. The potential
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
28
proximal p53 binding sites were mutated as described: TTCATG →
TTACCA and
GGCATG → GGATCC in CYP2A6-5’-160/p53mut-Luc, with the mutated
bases in bold and
the underlined bases representing the core sequence. The mutated
and wildtype CYP2A6-5’-
Luc constructs were transfected to C3A cells and luciferase
activities were measured 24 h
after transfection. The measured luciferase activities were
normalized against co-transfected
pMAX-GFP control plasmid activities. The values (n = 4)
represent the means ± S.D. p53
response of each reporter construct is indicated by -fold of
activity to control co-transfection
with pcDNA3. Mean difference is significant from control group
at ****, p < 0.0001; **, p <
0.005 (Student’s t test).
Figure 3: EMSA analysis of p53 protein/CYP2A6 promoter
interactions. (A) A schematic
representation of the -160 to +1 region in the proximal CYP2A6
promoter. The closed arrows
indicate orientation of the EMSA probe. The closed line square
highlights sequence of the
potential p53RE that was revealed by the MatInspector
transcription factor binding site
search (http://www.genomatix.de/). The opened line square
highlights sequence of the
HNF4α response element. (B) Western blot of p53 in the nuclei
fractions of C3A cells
transfected with p53 expression plasmid (pcDNA3-hp53). Positive
control (+) = A-431
whole cell lysate. (C) EMSA blot. Nuclei proteins extracted from
C3A cells transfected with
pcDNA3-hp53 expression plasmid were incubated with
digoxigenin-labelled probe the
orientation of which was shown in (A). Probe 1 = 94 bp
oligonucleotide containing the
putative binding site from -149 to -55 bp. Probe 2 = 29 bp
oligonucleotide spanning the
putative binding site from -127 to -98 bp. Probe1Mut = Probe 1
with the core sequence,
CATG, critical for p53 binding, mutated to ACCA. Lanes 1 &
11 represent incubation
without nuclei proteins. Lanes 3 & 13 represent incubation
with nuclei proteins and anti-p53
antibody. Lane 9 represents incubation with nuclei proteins and
anti-Nrf2 antibody. Lanes 8
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
29
& 14 represent incubation with nuclei proteins and anti-
HNF4α antibody The reactions with
nuclear extracts were competed with 125-fold excess of
unlabelled probe (S) (lane 4) and
descending concentrations of unlabelled consensus p53RE
oligonucleotides (C) (lanes 5-7).
Lane 10 represents incubation with nuclei proteins
digoxigenin-labelled mutated probe. The
closed arrow indicates smaller DNA-protein complex, and the
opened arrow indicates bigger
complex. The experiment was repeated three times, and similar
results were obtained.
Figure 4: Effect of benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) treatment on endogenous
p53 activation and the
proximal CYP2A6-luciferase construct activities in MCF-7 cells.
The cells were transfected
with pGL4.38-p53-Luc, CYP2A6-5’-160/+9-Luc, or
CYP2A6-5’-160/p53mut-Luc for 4 h
before being treated with various concentrations of BaP.
Twenty-four hours after treatment
nuclei proteins were extracted and luciferase activities were
measured. (A) Western blot of
p53, HNF4 and β-actin (loading control) in MCF-7 cells treated
with various concentrations
of BaP. Positive controls (+) = A-431 whole cell lysate for p53,
HepG2 whole cell lysate for
HNF4 and β-actin peptide. Each blot represents one of three
blots (each blot showed the
same pattern of induction). (B) Densitometry analysis of the
Western blots. Fold induction =
Relative p53 or HNF4 expression of treated samples / Relative
p53 or HNF4 expression of
control (0 µM BaP). Relative p53 or HNF4 expression = the
intensity of p53 or HNF4
band relative to the intensity of β-actin band. The values (n =
3) represent the means ± S.D.
*Mean difference is significant from control group at p <
0.05 (Student’s t test). (C) Effect of
BaP treatment on the luciferase activities of the putative
CYP2A6 p53RE constructs. The
firefly luciferase activities were measured 24 h after BaP
treatment. The measured activites
were normalized against pMAX-GFP activity (transfection control
plasmid). The values (n =
4) represent means ± S.D. *Mean difference is significant from
control group at p < 0.05
(Student’s t test).
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
30
Figure 5: Effect of BaP on endogenous p53, native CYP2A6 and
HMOX1 expression in
C3A cells. The cells were treated with various concentrations of
BaP for 24 h. Thereafter
total RNA, nuclei and cytosolic proteins were extracted.
Quantitative real time RT-PCR was
used to detect CYP2A6 and HMOX1 mRNA expression. (A) Western
blot and densitometry
of nuclei p53 and cytosolic CYP2A6 and HMOX1. β-actin was used
as loading control.
Each blot represents one of three blots (each blot showed the
same pattern of induction).
Positive controls (+) = A-431 whole cell lysate for p53;
peptides for β-actin and HMXO1;
and recombinant CYP2A6 yeast microsomes. Fold induction =
Relative protein expression of
treated samples / Relative protein expression of control (0 µM
BaP). Relative protein
expression = the intensity of protein band relative to the
intensity of β-actin band. (B)
Migration of RT-PCR products in 2.5% agarose gel. Lane 1 = 50 bp
DNA ladder. Lanes 2, 5
and 8 are products from control cells; lanes 3, 6 and 9 are
products from treated cells; and
lanes 6, 7 and 10 are non-template control (NTC). GAPDH =
housekeeping gene. The sizes
of the PCR products align with the amplified regions by the
primers. (C) Fold induction of
p53 proteins, CYP2A6 and HMOX1 mRNA and protein in control and
treated cells.
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
31
Figure 1
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
32
Figure 2
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
33
Figure 3
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
34
Figure 4
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
35
Figure 5
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
36
Table 1: Oligonucleotides used for amplifications in Real-time
PCR, EMSA and site-directed
mutagenesis experiments.
Primers Sequences
PCR Amplification:
CYP2A6 5’ -368 KpnI FW
CYP2A6 5’ -308 KpnI FW
CYP2A6 5’ -250 KpnI FW
CYP2A6 5’ -160 KpnI FW
CYP2A6 5’ -74 KpnI FW
CYP2A6 5’ +9 NheI RV
CYP2A6 5’ -2901KpnI
CYP2A6 5’ -437KpnI
5’-GACGGTACCCCCCCAGATCCACAACTTTG-3’
5’-GACGGTACCGTGCTCCCCTATGCAAATATTC-3’
5’-GACGGTACCTCCTAAATCCACAGCCCTGC-3’
5’-GACGGTACCTTATCCTCCCTTGCTGGCTG-3’
5’-GACGGTACCATCAGCCAAAGTCCATCCCTC-3’
5’-GACGCTAGCGGTGGTAGTGGGATGATAGATG-3’
5’-GACGGTACCCATCCATCCGCTTCATCCTACAG-3’
5’-GACGGTACCCCTAAATGCACAGCCACACTTTG-3’
mRNA analysis:
CYP2A6 NM_000762
GAPDH NM_002046
HMOX1 NM_002133
F: 5’-AAGATCAGTGAGCGC TATGG-3’
R: 5’-TGAATACCACGCATAGCCT-3’
Amplicon size: 178 bp
F: 5’- CATGAGAAGTATGACAACAGCCT-3’
R: 5’-AGTCCTTCCACGATACCAAAGT-3’
Amplicon size: 113 bp
F: 5’- CAGTGCCACCAAGTTCAAGC-3'
R: 5’-GTTGAGCAGGAACGCAGTCTT-3'
Amplicon size: 112 bp
EMSA:
Primer 1
Primer 2
5’-TGCTGGCTGTGTCCCAAGCTAG-3’
5’-GGGATGGACTTTGGCTGATTAC-3’
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
37
Site-directed mutagenesis:
CYP2A6-p53mut RV
CYP2A6-p53mut FW
5’-TAGGATCCCCACTGGTAATCCTGCCTAGCTTGG-3’
5’-ACCAGTGGGGATCCTAGTTGGGAGGTGAAATG-3’
-
ACC
EPTE
D M
ANU
SCR
IPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
38
Highlights
CYP2A6 is an immediate target gene of p53
Six putative p53REs located on 3 kb proximate CYP2A6 promoter
region
The region -160 bp from TSS is highly homologous with the p53
consensus sequence
P53 specifically bind to the p53RE on the -160 bp region
HNF4 may interact with p53 in regulating CYP2A6 expression