TULSA COUNTY MEMO 3... · TULSA COUNTY MEMO PURCHASING ... Arkansas River Corridor Preliminary Project Management Plan ... authorized under the Water Resource Development Act of ...

TULSA COUNTY

MEMO PURCHASING DEPARTMENT

DATE MARCH 5 2014

FROM LINDA R DORRELL PURCHASING DIRECTOR

TO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

SUBJECT REVISION 1 TO AMENDMENT 3-CH2M HILL INC

SUBMITTED FOR YOUR APPROVAL AND EXECUTION IS THE ATTACHED REVISION 1 TO AMENDMENT 3 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND CH2M HILL INC CMF213255 (ORIGINAL AGREEMENT) AND CMF225825 (AMENDMENT 3) FOR THE ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR PROJECT

THIS AMENDMENT IS FOR ADJUSTING COMPENSTATION AND TIME REGARDING THE ARKANAS RIVER CORRIDOR PROJECT THIS CONTRACT IS AMENDED TO DECREASE THE FEE BY $16400100 AND THE REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT IS $111319500 IN ADDITION THIS CONTRACT IS TO EXTEND THE COMPLETION DATE TO OCTOBER 31 2017

THE AMENDEMENT IS AS PER ATTACHED DOCUMENTATION

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED FOR YOUR APPROVAL AND EXECUTION

LRDlsks

ORIGINAL PAT KEY COUNTY CLERK FOR THE MARCH 102014 AGENDA

COPIES COMMISSIONER JOHN M SMALIGO COMMISSIONER KAREN KEITH COMMISSIONER RON PETERS MARK LIOTTA CHIEF DEPUTY MICHAEL WILLIS CHIEF DEPUTY VICKI ADAMS CHIEF DEPUTY

Form 4363 (Rev 4-98)

Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement

Amendment Number 3 - Revision 1

In accordance with Section 170 of the Agreement dated January 262009

BETWEEN the Owner Board of County Commissioners Tulsa County 500 South Denver Ave Tulsa OK 74103

And the Engineer CH2M HILL Inc Mid-Continent Tower 401 South Boston Suite 330 Tulsa OK 74103

F or the Project Arkansas River Corridor Projects Tulsa County Oklahoma

Authorization is requested to proceed with Additional Services or a Change in Services as described in Attachment B Scope of Services

The following adjustments shall be made to compensation and time

Compensation Attachment D of the Contract is hereby amended to decrease the fee by One HundredshySixty-four Thousand and one Dollars and No Cents ($16400100) The revised contract amount is One Million One Hundred-thirteen Thousand One Hundred-ninety-five dollars and No Cents ($111319500)

Time Extend Completion date to October 312017

SUBMITTED BY

Bryan ItchelL Busmess VIce-PresIdent CH2M HILL (Printed name and title)

(Date) 2 - Zfgt - (to

~pound- ~c-= -7~7 --shy

Page 1 of 1

AGREED TO

Ron Peters - Chair of BOCC (Printed name and title)

(Date)________

ATTEST

County Clerk

ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR PROJECT SUPPLELENTAJ STUDIES AND EIS SUPPORT

SCOPE OF SERVICES

SCOPE OF SERVICES The SERVICES to be performed by CH2M HILL Inc (CH2M HILL) under this AGREEMENT will consist of preparing a 404 permit application and supplemental supporting studies for the Arkansas River Corridor Project The permit and studies are in anticipation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that will be prepared by a 3rd-party contractor selected by Tulsa District US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Further it is understood and agreed that the date of beginning rate of progress and the time of completion of the work to be done hereunder are essential provisions of this AGREEMENT and it is further understood and agreed that the work embraced in this AGREEMENT shall commence upon execution of this AGREEMENT and after receipt of a Notice to Proceed

BACKGROUND

This scope of work is based upon our understanding of the project goals and through discussions with Tulsa Countys representative PMg and other project stakeholders The goals of the overall Arkansas River Corridor Project as it was initially envisioned include the addition of two new low-head dam structures and the enhancement and restoration of several key development sites within a 42-mile project reach Much progress towards these goals has occurred through the Vision and Master Planning efforts Environmental Baseline studies the site-specific Zink Dam Lake Area Improvements Project Environmental Assessment and preliminary design To assist project stakeholders an Arkansas River Corridor Preliminary Project Management Plan (PPMP) was finalized in February of 2010 It provided an Investigation and Feasibility Study for Ecosystem Restoration for the envisioned projects Based on initial interest in the Arkansas River Corridor Projects the City of Bixby indicated interest in participating in the Corridor Project and in pursuing a third low-head dam this low-head dam location was identified in the Vision and Master Plans but was not studied specifically in subsequent phases until added as Supplemental Studies under the previous authorization This will develop the same bas~line project information and conceptual engineering as the other project components so it can be incorporated into this EIS with the balance of the corridor

OVERVIEW

Tulsa County and the USACE have been collaborating on the potential funding and implementation of the Arkansas River Corridor Projects The program was authorized under the Water Resource Development Act of 2007 (WRDA2007) but only $90000 in funding has been appropriated for the 42-miles of river improvements with limited prospects for additional funding in the near future In February of 2012 Major General Michael Walsh Deputy Commanding General for Civil and Emergency Operations (DCG-CEO) signed a significant memorandum affecting execution of the USACE CW Feasibility Study Program The memo sets forth requirements for reclassification and reset of ongoing feasibility studies and conduct of feasibility studies that have not reached the feasibility scoping meeting milestone by 31 December 2011

COPYRIGHT 2014 BY CH2U HIll INCbullbull COtFANY CONFIDENTIAL

ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR PROJECT SUPPLEPJENTAL STUDIES AND EI8 SUPPORT

The Arkansas River Corridor Project participated in a re-scoping charette in October of 2013 to introduce the USACEs SMART planning and decision focus concepts to determine the federal interest and to enable the Project Team (Tulsa County represented by PMg and CH2M HILL) to develop a revised PMP to complete studies that will conform to 3x3x3 rule

To facilitate the timely use of the information collected to date under previous and current efforts as well as to build on the local momentum surrounding the Corridor the County decided to move forward with a regulatory approach as it awaits the USACEs decision of whether it will proceed with a IIplanning study approach for Sand Springs the only Project found to be in the federal interest The regulatory approach will be triggered by the 404 permit developed under Task 9 of this authorization with the USACE Tulsa District being the lead federal agency with statutory authority under Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 Section 10 and Clean Water Act Section 404 Initial discussions with the Planning Division have indicated that the USACE is willing to participate in the EIS process but some form of nonshyfederal funding will be needed an appropriate agreement reached between the County and the Tulsa District and ultimately a 3rd party contractor selected by the USACE to prepare the EIS and facilitate the public scoping process with the support of Project Team

APPROACH

The following tasks are proposed to prepare the 404 permit complete the Supplemental Studies and support the development of the EIS (1) USACE Coordination (2) Scoping and Consultation (3) Data Collection and Review (4) Supplemental Studies (5) Support of the EIS (6) Final EIS (7) Public Notice and Administrative Record (8) Project Management and (9) Section 404 Permitting Support

The attached project schedule describes the overall EIS timeline Issues or delays could arise that would alter the anticipated schedule Meeting the schedule on a project of this magnitude will require clear and timely communication between all parties including during reviews and decision making on some possibly difficult choices Meeting and even accelerating schedule milestones will be of utmost importance to satisfy citizen expectations and to minimize continual impacts on the overall project budget resulting from ongoing construction cost escalation

The Projects detailed Scope of Services is included on the following pages

ARC_SuppStudyEISsupporLAltachmentB_201401 08

COPYRIGHT 2014 BY CH2M HILL INC COWANY CONFIDENTIAL

ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR PROJECT SUPPLErENTALSTUDIES AND ElS SUPPORT

Contents

Contentsbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull1 Task 1 USACE Coordination bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull2 11 Support of Tulsa District EIS Agreement2 12 Project Coordination 3 13 Document Review Meetings 3 Task 2 Scoping and Consultation 4 21 Public SCoping 4 22 Agency Consultation 4 Task 3 Data Collection and Review bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull5 Task 4 Supplemental Studiesbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull6 41 Bixby Project Information Development 6 42 Conceptual Engineering for Bixby Project 8 43 Interior Least Tern Biological Assessment Study 8 44 Cultural Resource Survey 9 45 Hydrologic Study 10 46 Preliminary Project Cost Study 11 47 Economic Analysis Study 12 Task 5 Support of EIS bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull13 51 Description of the Proposed Action and Alternatives 13 52 Analysis of Alternatives 13 53 Description of Existing Conditions 13 54 Environmental Analysis 14 55 EIS Consultation and Coordination14 56 Irlitial Draft EIS 14 57 Final Draft EIS and Public Review 14 Task 6 Final BIS bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull14 Task 7 Public Notice and Administrative Record 14 Task 8 Project Managementbullbullbullbullbullbullbull15 81 Project Management and Internal Coordination 15

Project Management 15 Project Workshops 16

82 Information Management 17 Project and Document Management Website 18

Task 9 Section 4()4 Permitting Support bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull20 91 Concept Design 20 92 Wetland Delineation and Report21 93 Mitigation Planning 22 94 Oean Water Act Section 404 Permitting Support22 95 Section 404 Meetings and Agency Coordination 23

ARC_SuppStudyEISsupporCAltachmentB_20140108

COPYRIGHT 2014 BY CH2M HILL INCbullbull CONPANY CONFIDENTIAL

ARKANSAS RiVER CORRIDOR PROJECT SUPPLEMNTAL STUDIES AND ElS SUPPORT

Task 1 USACE Coordination

As the lead agency for the EIS special coordination will be needed with the Tulsa District of the USACE over and above the coordination and consultation required for the other state and federal agencies Specific tasks include the negotiation of the EIS implementation agreement data knowledge transfer of work to date to the 3rd party contractor monthly coordination calls and document review meetings to ensure Project resources are being efficiently utilized

11 Support of Tulsa District EIS Agreement

The Tulsa District and Tulsa County signed a cost sharing agreement to facilitate sharing of responsibility and funding for the Arkansas River Corridor Project assuming WRDA2007 funding Since this funding has not been appropriated the original agreement will need to be amended to allow the USACE to provide support during the development of the EIS and the hiring of the 3rd party contractor CH2M HILL staff will assist the Project team as needed in the development of a revised agreement with the USACE a scope of work based on the previous authorization and current supplemental studies As part of developing the agreement the Project team will meet to review the USACEs procurement approach

Assumptions

bull PMg will lead the coordination with the Tulsa County Administration regarding the final agreement with the USACE

bull The original cost sharing agreement will be the basis for the revised agreement bull USACE will select a 3rd party contractor to develop the EIS and lead the Public

Scoping process bull Three meetings will be attended by CH2M HILLs task lead

Deliverables

bull CH2M HILL will provide a draft agreement for consideration by the Project team bull Meeting minutes for all three meetings

Task Leader Anna ChildersCH2M HILL

QAQC Leader Doug BaughmanCH2M HILL

ARC_SuppStudyEISsupporLAttachmentB_20140108 COPYRIGHT 2014 BY CH2M HILl INCbull COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL

2

ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR PROJECT SUFPLEPtENTAl STUDIES AND flS SUPPORT

12 Project Coordination Monthly coordination calls will be held with the 3rd Party Contractor USACE and PMg staff to track progress of the EIS address immediate issues and maintain project schedule CH2M HILL will establish the calls coordinate with participants and provide call summaries

Deliverables

Documentation of each of the conference calls

Task Leader Anna ChildersCH2M HILL

QAQC Leader Doug BaughmanCH2M HILL

13 Document Review Meetings CH2M HILL will support the PMg as the Arkansas River corridor goes through a USACE SMART Planning Charette which is designed to help accelerate the traditional feasibility study process eliminate unnecessary analysis (time amp money) and provide clarity to the remaining scope CH2M HILL will facilitate a series of document review meetings with the County and USACE staff Specific deliverables requiring face to face meetings will be determined in consultation with the USACE and County staff

Assumptions

bull Two CH2M HILL senior staff members will participate in the USACE Charette meeting at the Tulsa District USACE offices

bull A total of two meetings will be conducted in the PMg or USACE offices in Tulsa to coordinate on the Section 404 application and EIS

bull Meetings will be attended by the Task leader and one senior technical support staff from CH2M HILL

Deliverables

bull Support of the Project Team in preparation for and during the USACE SMART Planning Charette and preparation of draft meeting minutes from the Charette

bull Additional coordination of 2 document review meetings and preparation of the resulting meeting summaries

Task Leader Anna ChildersCH2M HILL

QAQC Leader Doug BaughmanCH2M HILL

ARC_SuppStudyEISsupporLAltachmentB_20140108

COPYRIGHT 2014 BY CH2M HILL INCbull COWANY CONFIDENTIAL

3

ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR PRaJECT SUPPLEtpoundNTAl SlUDtESAND ElS SUPPORT

Task 2 Seoping and Consultation

The NEPA scoping process determines the seope of issues to be addressed and identifies the significant issues related to a proposed action Substantial stakeholder involvement has occurred throughout the development of the Previous Studies and shaped the scope of Technical Studies as well as the formulation of project alternatives currently being considered Previous seoping efforts included three public scoping meetings in the cities of Jenks Sand Springs and Tulsa in September of 2009 The purpose of these meetings was to inform the public of the projects current status and to request input that would be incorporated into future technical studies and an Environmental Summary Report Such involvement provided a strong foundation for understanding the range and significance of issues that can be anticipated during the EIS formal scoping process Under this revised scope of services CH2M HILLs responsibilities will be to support the agency consultation task The remainder of this task related to the NEPA scoping process and ongoing Agency consultation during the development of the EIS will be completed by the 3rd-party contractor

21 Public Scoping This task will be completed by a 3rd-party contractor

22 Agency Consultation

Local state and federal agencies have been involved with the Arkansas River Corridor Project since its inception A 3rd-party contractor and CH2M HILL will support Tulsa County with ongoing Agency consultation in development of the EIS For continuity CH2M HILL will provide up to 80 hours of continued consultation related to the biological assessment (see Task 43) and the cultural resources supplemental study (see Task 44)

Deliverables

bull Agency Consultation letters in support of Task 4 biological assessment and cultural resource supplemental studies

Task Leader Anna Childer~CH2M HILL

QAQC Leader Doug BaughmanjCH2M HILL

ARC_SuppSludyEISsupporCAttachmentB_20140108

COPYRIGHT 2014 BY CH2M Hlu INCbullbull COWPAtlV CONFIDENTIAL

4

ARKANW RIVER CORRIDOR PROJECT SUPPLEtpoundNTAL STUDIES AND as SUPPORT

Task 3 Data Collection and Review

This effort will briefly revisit previous data collection and review efforts summarized primarily in the Preliminary Regulatory Review Data Gaps Analysis and Summary of Potential Project Effects TM and the PPMP to identify new data and additional data needs for use in a the 3rd party EIS The EIS typically takes a broader geographi~ scope versus a traditional EA This task will update the existing bibliography of references based on a review of recent information data and study reports and update the data gaps analysis in light of recent studies The balance of the effort for this subtask relates to the collection by a-I2M HILL of time sensitive information such as demographic and economic data sets for use in the Economic Analysis Supplemental Study (Task 47)

Assumptions

bull Data collection efforts will be limited to the new Sand Springs South TulsaJenks and Bixby low-head dams and pedestrian bridges

bull The review will reflect the project teams current understanding of the project and existing regulations Changes in the project and regulations will require reassessment of study conclusions

bull Data collection efforts for Bixby are included under Supplemental Study Task 41 Bixby Project Information

bull The 3rd party contractor will be responsible for revising the Preliminary Regulatory Review Data Gaps Analysis and Summary of Potential Project Effects TM and the PPMP based on a review of the Arkansas River Corridor Projects - EIS Data Review Evaluation and Recommendations for Additional Study TM which summaries the evaluation of available data possible effects of the project and additional data collection necessary to complete the preliminary constraint or impact analyses

Deliverables

bull CH2M HILL will update the existing bibliography of references based on a review of recent information data and study reports and update the data gaps analysis in light of recent studies

bull CH2M HILL will collect time sensitive information such as demographic and economic data sets for use in the Economic Analysis Supplemental Study (Task 47) and review the Preliminary Regulatory Review Data Gaps Analysis and Summary of Potential Project Effects TM and the PPMP for consistency with previous efforts

bull 3rd party contractor will be responsible for collecting data for new resource areas and revisions to the Preliminary Regulatory Review Data Gaps Analysis and Summary of Potential Project Effects TM and the PPMP

Task Leader Lauren Chamblin CH2M HILL

QAQC Leader Doug BaughmanCH2M HILL

Subconsultant Support Meshek amp Associates

ARC_SuppSludyEISsuppoJt_AttachmentB_20140108

COPYRIGHT 2014 BY CH2M HILL INCbull CorPANY CONFIDENTIAl

5

ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR PROJECT SUPPLEfJENTAL STUDIES AND EIS SUPPORT

Task 4 Sup~lemental Studies While much analysis has been completed to advance implementation of the project additional work elements are required to ensure compliance with local state and federal regulations and to assess potential impacts see Attachment B The following initial supplemental Technical Studies are recommended for completion by the project team for use in the EIS It is anticipated that additional supplemental studies will be identified by stakeholders and or agency representatives as a result of the scoping and consultation activities described in Task 1 The scope and level of effort of these additional studies will be determined at that time

41 Bixby Project Information Development

During the development of the PMP and related previous studies a number of preliminary evaluations were completed on the proposed alternatives for the Sand Springs and Jenks low-head dams and the modifications to the existing Zink Dam and lake The preliminary design and permitting for the Zink Dam and lake improvements are proceeding independently of the EIS The City of Bixby has proposed to include a third new low-head dam as part of the Arkansas River Corridor projects program as presented in the Arkansas River Corridor Master Plan Because this project was not included in the previous technical studies additional engineering and associated evaluations will need to be completed to bring the Bixby project up to the same level of development as the Sand Springs and South TulsaJenks projects Specific tasks include alternatives development environmental constraints analysis and hydrologic modeling

Alternatives Development - Potential project alternatives will be identified in meetings with Bixby staff and the consultant team including CH2M HILL LandPlan Meshek and Associates and PMg An initial meeting will be held to review the City of Bixbys primary ideas and interests and then the project team will develop some conceptual drawings for review with the City staff during a second meeting The conceptual drawings will identify location potential height and general configuration (number of gates) of dam and any associated project elements Initial drawings will be architectural images on an aerial photo or map background Based on feedback from the city staff the project team will proceed with the required level of conceptual engineering (Task 42)

Environmental Constraints Analysis - Based on the initial concepts for the Bixby project an evaluation of potential impacts on natural resources and protected species will be completed This task will identify key issues that will need to be addressed as part of the EIS Potential issues associated with biological resources wetlands protected species cultural resources water quality and quantity floodplains transportation socioeconomics and utilities and infrastructure will be included in this evaluation A limited (1 day) reconnaissance site visit will be completed as part of this analysis

Hydrologic Analysis - One of the primary issues will be the potential for impacts on the current floodplain and floodway in the vicinity of the proposed Bixby project Therefore the existing HEC-RAS model will need to be modified to include this reach of the Arkansas

6

COPYRIGHT 2014 BY CHat HIll INC COAfIANY CONFIDENTIAl

ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR PROJECT SUPPLELpoundNTAL STUDIES AND ElS SUPPORT

River and the proposed dam Additionally a limited field survey of stormwater outfalls will be performed to ensure that the hydrologic analysis is consistent with the previous hydrologic studies being used as the basis for Task 45 In collaboration with Meshek and Associations CH2M HILL will update the HEC RAS model and evaluate the potential for changes in the current 100 year floodplain elevations based on the initial dam design and associated project elements (gate configurations)

Update the Preliminary Project Management Plan - The results of the original evaluation of the Arkansas River Corridor Projects and the proposed project elements was summarized in a Preliminary Project Management Plan (PPMP) in 2010 This document serves as the background documentation for development and implementation of the proposed projects in collaboration with the US Army Corps of Engineers Although there is no immediate Federal funding available for this program the project proponents (Tulsa County Sand Springs South TulsaJenks and Bixby) plan to continue to pursue potential Federal support Therefore the original PPMP will need to be updated to include the information for the Bixby Project Results of the previous sub tasks will be used to update the document prepared in 2010

Assumptions

bull CH2M HILL will conduct two workshops with City of Bixby staff to outline project elements and alternatives

bull Existing HEC RAS modeling data for the Arkansas River can be readily modified for the Bixby area

bull Field surveys of stormwater outfalls in the Bixby area are not readily available and will require up to 40 hours of field work to inventory for the hydrologic analysiS

bull No wetland delineations will be completed as part of the recoIUlaissance field visit

Deliverables bull Preliminary drawings of the potential dam and associated project elements on aerial

photo or map based background Two rounds of drafts will be prepared for review and comment working with LandPlan

bull A brief Field Trip TM documenting the results of a 1 day reconnaissance field trip to observe current conditions

bull A draft and final technical memorandum summarizing the Bixby alternatives analysis and environmental constraints analysis

bull A draft and final technical memorandum on the hydrologic modeling evaluation working with Meshek amp Associates

bull A draft and final of the updated PPMP incorporating the results of the Bixby project evaluation

Task Leader Steve Miller CH2M HILL

QAQC Leader Lars OstervoldCH2M HILL

Subconsultant Support Meshek amp Associates and LandPlan

COPYRIG1fT 201- BY CH2M HIuINCmiddot C()y)ANY CONFIDENTIAl

ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR PROJECT SUPPLEMNTAL STUOlESAND as SUPPORT

42 Conceptual Engineering for Bixby Project To evaluate the potential environmental effects and associated costs a conceptual design of the proposed Bixby project will need to be developed This conceptual design will determine the required footprint (area) of the dam based on the proposed height the number and general configuration type of gate structures and associated elements to meet the citys goals for the low-head dam Conceptual plan view engineering drawings will be developed to further define the proposed configuration of the dam The conceptual design will be used to develop specific cost estimates consistent with the procedures outlined in Task 47 below

Assumptions

bull The initial design developed in Task 41 will be the basis for the conceptual design task bull The project will be illustrated in no more than 6 drawings

Deliverables

Engineering drawings of the proposed Bixby project and associated elements

Task Leader Lars OstervoldCH2M HILL

QAQC Leader Bob GattonCH2M HILL

Subconsultant Support LandPlan

43 Interior Least Tern Biological Assessment Study USFWS (1985) lists the interior population of the least tern (interior least tern) as federally endangered The interior least tern breeds on alluvial islands and sandbars in the Arkansas River Corridor project area and other rivers in central North America Based on consultation to date USFWS will likely determine that the Arkansas River Corridor Project may adversely affect the federally endangered interior least tern This determination will require formal consultation with USFWS under Section 7 of the ESA Formal consultation requires the preparation of a Biological Assessment and USFWS issuance of a Biological Opinion under a pre-determined timeline that would directly affect project schedule and could result in additional Reasonable and Prudent Measures (RPMs) for implementation in the river This subtask supports the development of a Biological Assessment of the Interior Least Tern for use in formal consultation

Assumptions

bull A Biological Assessment will be required only for the interior least tern The USFWS will find that the proposed project would be unlikely to adversely affect any other federally listed species including the American burying beetle piping plover and whooping crane therefore will not require formal consultation for any other species No field survey efforts are anticipated for this analysis and are not included in this subtask

bull Agency Consultation letters are covered under Subtask 22 Agency Consultation

8

COPYRIGHT 2014 BY CH2M HILL INCbull COtFANY CONFIDENTIAL

ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR PROJECT SUPPLEMENTAL STUDIES AND ElS SUPPORT

bull Existing information on biotic communities in the corridor is adequate to describe the affected environment and will be used to the greatest extent possible to evaluate potential impacts of the preliminary alternatives to the least tern

bull The BA prepared for the Zink Lake Improvements project will be utilized to the extent practical

bull Ifexisting data or tools are insufficient to address USFWS questions or concerns regarding potential impacts or measures for avoiding impacts to interior least tern additional out of scope services may be required

bull Approximately 4 consultation meetings with USFWS will be conducted It is assumed that trips for these meetings will be combined wherever possible to reduce costs and can be accomplished with no more than 3 sets of trips

bull Travel for one staff member not in Tulsa is assumed for 2 of the consultation meetings

Deliverables

bull A draft and final BA will be completed bull Meeting minutes from each of the consultation meetings

Task Leader AlUla ChildersCH2M HILL

QAQC Leader Doug Baughman CH2M HILL

Subconsultant Support Everett Laney

44 Cultural Resource Survey Based upon the nature of the corridor cultural resources assessments will be critical to reduce adverse impacts and plan mitigation The survey will be developed and carried out in accordance with the Archaeological Resources Protection Act and National Historic Preservation Act The extent and level of detail of the cultural resource surveys will be developed through consultations with the Oklahoma Archeological Survey (OAS) SHPO and other stakeholders during scoping It is anticipated that a Phase I Inventory of Cultural Resources will be performed including a records search a field survey of each site and a written report will be developed as part of this task

Assumptions

bull The scope of the study reflects the project teams current understanding of the project Changes in the extent and nature of the study could result from seoping and require additional out of scope services

bull Agency Consultation letters are covered under Subtask 22 Agency Consultation bull A Phase I survey will be completed in the immediate vicinity of the proposed low-head

dams at Sand Springs South Tulsa Jenks and Bixby bull Up to 4 consultation meetings with the SHPO and or OAS will be conducted It is

assumed that trips for these meetings will be combined wherever possible to reduce costs and can be accomplished with no more than 3 sets of trips

bull Travel for one staff member not in Tulsa is assumed

COPYRIGHT 2014 BY CH2M HIL1 INCbull COWANY CONFIDENTIAL

9

ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR PROJECT SUPPLEMENTAL STUDIES AND EtS SUPPORT

Deliverables

Cultural Resource Survey Report to be utilized by the 3rd Party Contractor in the development of the EIS

Task Leader Sara Orton CH2M HILL

QAQC Leader Anna Childers CH2M HILL

Subconsultant Support Local Firm

45 Hydrologic Study A series of potential hydrologic studies were previously identified to support the EIS including HEC-RAS modeling to assess impacts of the new structures on floodplain conditions and potential back-water impacts on existing storm drainage systems The EIS Supplemental Hydrologic Study will use existing HEC-RAS models to assess the range of potential hydrologic impacts of the alternatives and to demonstrate compliance with the FEMA IIno-rise (in base flood elevation) requirements

Existing models will be updated and run on up to 4 alternative configurations the results will be provided as Summary Report included as an appendix to the EIS

Assumptions

bull The scope of the study renects the project teams current understanding of the project changes in the extent and nature of the study could result from scoping and require additional out of scope services

bull Initial model setup storm water outfall inventory and calibration efforts for the Bixby area are included under subtask 41

bull Existing HEC-RAS models will be updated and run on up to 4 alternative configurations

Deliverables

Summary Report to be utilized by the 3rd Party Contractor in the development of the EIS

Task Leader Steve Miller CH2M HILL

QAQC Leader Doug Baughman CH2M HILL

Sub-consultant Support Meshek amp Associates

ARC_SuppSludyEISsupporCAttachmenIB_20140108

COPYRIGHT 2014 BY CH2M HILL INCbull COMPANY CONADENTIAL

10

ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR PROJECT SUPPLEtENTAlSTUDlESAND as SUPPORT

46 Preliminary Project Cost Study A TM was developed in 2010 that presented Conceptual-Level Cost Estimates Arkansas River Corridor Dam Improvement and River Bank Stabilization Projects These estimates were considered Qass 4 as defined by the Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE International) and were generally considered accurate from -15 percent to -30 percent on the low range side and +20 percent to +50 percent on the high range side A preliminary Project Cost Study will build on this earlier work to support the preparation of the EIS Estimates developed for this subtask will include

bull New Sand Springs low-head dam and pedestrian bridge bull New South TulsaJenks low-head dam and pedestrian bridge bull New Bixby low-head dam and pedestrian bridge bull Preliminary labor and non-labor construction and operation amp maintenance costs

including the approximate local versus non-local source split will be developed under this task for use in Economic Analysis Study Task 46

Assumptions

bull Preliminary cost estimates are limited to the instream structures described as part of the Proposed Action Task 5 and the general upland project components described in the Final Arkansas River Corridor Master Plan Phase II Master Plan and PreshyReconnaissance Study (Guernsey et al 2005)

bull The scope of the study reflects the project teams current understanding of the project Changes in the extent and nature of the study could result from scoping and require additional out of scope services

bull The results of Tasks 41 and 42 will be used as the basis for adding the Bixby elements to the Preliminary Project Cost Study

Deliverables

Summary Report to be utilized by the 3rd Party Contractor in the development of the EIS

Task Leader Lars Ostervold CH2M HILL

QAQC Leader Bob Gatton CH2M HILL

COPYRIGHT 2014 BY CH2M HILL INCbull COWPANY CONFlDENTtAL

11

ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR PROJECT SUPPLEtpoundNTAl SruDIES AND E1S SUPPORT

47 Economic Analysis Study The Economic Analysis Study will use IMPLAN tradeto assess the potential economic impacts of the Project on the seven-county Tulsa region for use in the EIS CH2M HILL will evaluate up to four project alternative configurations on the basis of costs to detennine the direct and indirect economic impacts

Assumptions

bull The scope of the study reflects the project teams current understanding of the project Changes in the extent and nature of the study could result from seoping and require additional out of scope services

bull This task assumes a limited level of effort the comprehensive economic benefit-cost and ecosystem restoration studies required by the USACE for the analysis of alternatives will be addressed at a later date

bull Includes expenses to purchase data for the 7 counties in the Tulsa Metropolitan Statistical Area for use in the IMPLANTM model

Deliverables

Summary Report to be included as an appendix to the EIS

Task Leader Mary Jo Kealy CH2M HILL

QAQC Leader Anna Childers CH2M HILL

COPYRIGHT 2014 BY CH2M HIUINCbullbull cOtJPAHY CONFIDENTlAl

12

ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIOOR PROJECT SUPPLfMNTAL STUDIES AND 88 SUPPORT

Task 5 Su~port of EIS

Task 5 includes a series of subtasks to support the USACE and their 3td party contTactor with the development of an initial and final draft EIS The EIS will evaluate the potential environmental consequences of measures under consideration for the Arkansas River Corridor Project and will serve as overall guidance for future environmental evaluations of individual improvement projects The majority of this task will be completed by the 3rd party contTactor and has been removed from CH2M HILLs previously authorized scope of services

51 Description of the Proposed Action and Alternatives This task will be completed by a 3rdparty contTactor The initial draft DOPAA will be delivered to Tulsa District USACE staff and the Local Project Sponsors for review and comment One round of comments will be addressed by the 3rd-party contTactor prior to distribution for public scoping

52 Analysis of Alternatives This task will be completed by a 3rd-party contTactor

53 Description of Existing Conditions This subtask will support a 3rd-party contractor with developing Chapter 3 Affected Environment of the EIS CH2M HILL will develop narrative descriptions of resource areas in the proposed project area based primarily on the existing information assembled for the project to date Due to the wide range of resource areas that must be assessed many resources areas have either not been previously addressed in Project studies such as vector contTol or require timely information to adequately assess the resource such as integrating the 2010 Census in any socioeconomic-related analysis Additionally the broad scope of the EIS will require some data sources to be revisited to provide consistent contiguous data across the Study Area for analysiS in 54 The bulk of the effort to collect data on these resource areas is included under this task (versus Task 3)

In addition CH2M HILL will assist with the review of the draft DOPAA and draft EIS that will be prepared by the 3td-party contTactor These reviews will be on behalf of the County to ensure consistency with and utilization of previous studies Review comments will be provided in writing for consideration by the County and the 3rd-party contTactor

Assumptions

bull The cost estimate for this task is based on the existing information assembled and furnished for the project to date and covered in this scope of work being sufficient to assess the environmental historic economic and social values that arewill be affected by the proposed action and alternatives in accordance with regulatory requirements No field investigations or additional data collection will be required

13

COPYRIGHT 2014 BY CH2M Hlu INCbullbull COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL

ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR PROJECT SUPPlftpoundNTAL STlJOlES AND EIS SUPPORT

bull The existing information and appropriate analyses from cooperating agencies will be provided in a timely manner

bull CH2M HILLs Project Manager and up to two additional CH2M HILL team members will attend a single one-day Initial Draft EIS Meeting in Tulsa travel costs for one nonshylocal staff member are included in the estimate The purpose of this meeting will be to transfer information on the previous studies to the 3rdparty contractor

Deliverables

bull Summary of Existing Conditions TM bull Memoranda (2) summarizing review comments on the Draft DOPAA and Draft EIS

Task Leader Heather Broome CH2M HILL

QAQC Leader Doug BaughmanCH2M HILL

54 Environmental Analysis This task will be completed by a 3rdparty contractor

55 EIS Consultation and Coordination This task will be completed by a 3rd-party contractor

56 Initial Draft EIS This task will be completed by a 3rdparty contractor

57 Final Draft EIS and Public Review This task will be completed by a 3rd-party contractor

Task 6 Final EIS

The Final EIS will be completed by a 3rdparty contractor

Task 7 Public Notice and Administrative Record

The public notice and administrative record will be prepared by a 3rd-party contractor

ARC_SuppStudyElSsupportAttachmentB_20140108

COPYRIGHT 2014 BY CH2M HIll INCbull CotPANY CONFIDENTlAL

14

ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR PROJECT SUPPLEMNTAl STUDIES AND as SUPPORT

Task 8 Project Management

Succinct communication to multiple stakeholders regarding the project status and key issues to be resolved is the purpose of Task 8 Under this task CH2M HILL will provide management and oversight of the Supplemental Studies including project management and internal coordination of the team project scheduling and use of project controls and communication and coordination with the Countys team local officials key stakeholders and the general public

81 Project Management and Internal Coordination

This subtask includes the day-to-day management of the Arkansas River project team over the duration of the initial phase of the project Activities include project team leadership and coordination chartering of the project team development and updating the project schedule holding project team meetings review of all key deliverables and review of communications with Tulsa County key internal conference calls monthly invoicing and change management

Project Management

This subtask addresses the day-to-day leadership of the project team for a period of 24 months following the Notice to Proceed Activities will include coordination subconsultant coordination identification of potential problems and issues resolution of key project issues resolution of key schedule constraints and communication with County staff regarding project issues Also included are meetings with key stakeholders such as the US Army Corps of Engineers Community Leadership such as the City of Jenks the City of Sand Springs City of Bixby and the City of Tulsa Indian Nations Council of Governments federal agencies such as US Fish and Wildlife Service and state agencies such as Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation and Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality Conduct peer reviews to obtain alignment and set key project concepts Ensure that the continuous QAQC process is followed

Plan and schedule the activities of the project team for the initial phase of the project This subtask includes developing scope packages for follow-on phases schedule development and resource loading In addition this task includes a half-day project team chartering meeting followed by a half-day project kickoff meeting The chartering meeting will bring the team together to discuss how the project team will function and establish project goals desired outcomes and project team processes that will be in effect during the project The project kickoff meeting will be a discussion of what the project team is to produce and when they are to produce it

This task includes meeting attendance by Anna Childers at a monthly meeting with PMg to discuss the project status

15

COPYRIGHT 2Q14 BV CH2M HIll INCbull COWANV CONFIOENT1Al

ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR PROJECT SUPPLEtpoundNTAL 81JOIES AND ElS SUPPORT

The project management team will prepare a summary of project status for distribution to community representatives and key stakeholders

Assumptions

bull Project management activities will be completed in 24 months

Deliverables

bull Monthly reports for the duration of the initial phase Schedule will be prepared in Microsoft Project 2007 with the status of the anticipated scope and timeline through 2014

bull Monthly progress reports financial reports and master baseline project schedule to accompany invoice

Task Leader Anna ChildersCH2M HILL

QAQC Leader Lars OstervoldCH2M HILL

Project Workshops

This subtask will provide for up to three two day workshops between CH2M HILL PMg and other project stakeholders as appropriate to establish a common understanding regarding topic areas such as the project purpose and need strategic communications and potential funding scenarios Prior to a client workshop CH2M HILL will review existing documents to identify any issues requiring additional discussion regarding the preparation of the EIS the supplemental studies and the overall scoping and consultation process The project team will be responsible for preparing the agenda and minutes of the meeting The project teams project manager and up to three technical leaders will attend the interdisciplinary meeting

Assumptions

bull The workshops will be conducted for at the Tulsa County or PMg offices

bull The project team will prepare the agenda and meeting minutes for the meetings and post them on the internal project web site

bull Travel for up to two staff members not in Tulsa is assumed for each workshop

Deliverables

bull Supporting presentations andor handouts to assist in meeting facilitation

bull Draft and final agendas for each meeting

bull Draft and final meeting minutes

Task Leader Anna ChildersCH2M HILL

QAQC Leader Doug BaughmanCH2M HILL

ARC_SuppStudyEISsupporCAttschmentB_20140108

COPYRIGHT 2014 BY CH2M HILL INCbullbull CClIIoPANY CONADENTIAL

16

ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR PROJECT SUPPLEfoIENTAL STUDIES AND SS SUPPORT

82 Information Management

This task assembles tracks maintains and organizes the plethora of electronic data that exists or will be created in support of the project Standardization of the data warehousing creates information stores that multiple agencies stakeholders team members and the general public can access and share

This component includes the development of a GIS repository for the warehousing management and dispersal of spatial and tabular data related to the project Support services for the GIS repository will prOVide importexport definition and re-projection of spatial coordinate systems for digital data used during project development The GIS data will be housed and managed in a central repository leveraging a common data standard A GIS web site will support the publication and distribution of digital data and information to allow controlled access for the review and distribution of information between Tulsa County staff and project design team members

Digital Data Repository The digital data repository is a warehouse for all spatial and tabular data utilized in the project meeting the design needs of the various task teams and making their work more efficient Task responsibilities include data collection data importexport coordinate reprojection update of data layers renaming data layers into established naming conventions and placing in the standardized file structure Data will be collected from Tulsa County the Center for Spatial Analysis (CSA) at the University of Oklahoma ODOT OTA USACE USGS and other local regional state federal and private sources A digital data inventory will be created and updated as new digital files are imported into the GIS repository using the SDSFIE (Spatial Data Standards for Facilities Infrastructure and Environment) data model

GIS Support Services The GIS support services are to provide a resource to plot maps create and provide specialized data sets facilitate data analysis and other GIS services to project team members during project tasks as appropriate Spatial and tabular data will be utilized during the design and planning process as a reference to the existing conditions and for presentation of design features Project management will require that these data sets be updated continually to effectively manage the project as it progresses from design to completion Communications to project team members contractors developers and the public will require digital data to represent many aspects of the project graphically including the analysis of environmental impacts key responsibilities for specific tasks chronological development of the site and promotion of the completed project The GIS team will prOVide deSigners and planners with digital base map data required to plan and design the various systems within the project area Schematic concepts survey data aerial photography subsurface data and other components will be imported into the GIS system Metadata will be created for all data detailing source and modification information and will be available for team members to verify the accuracy and quality of all data

COPYRIGHT 2014 BY CH2M HILL INCbullbull CotIPNN CONFIDENTIAL

17

ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR PROJECT SUPPLEtpoundNTAl STUDIES AND EIS SUPPORT

Assumptions

bull Digital data gathered or created during phase one will be inventoried and warehoused in the digital data repository It is assumed that all data to be warehoused will be submitted to CH2M HILL in a digital format The scope of this task does not include any conversion of hard copy or raster data to vector format Data will have coordinates tied to the North Oklahoma State Plane Coordinate System (surface and grid values) and based on North American Datum 1983 (NAD 83) and elevations based on North American Vertical Datum 1988 (NAVD 88) unless required to remain in the native projection Vector file types will include ESRI GIS formats MicroStation vS or AutoCAD

bull Presentation materials and non-survey grade digital data will be provided at a level appropriate for planning purposes only

Deliverables

bull The digital data repository will warehouse spatial and tabular databases gathered or created in this project This data repository will be hosted by CH2M HILL and transferred to the County upon completion of the project

bull The project team will produce up to three (3) presentation quality boards at the midshypoint of the initial phase and at the end of the initial phase A PDF version of presentation materials will be provided to the County GIS data and analysis will be provided to the project team as required for planning and design

Task Leader Kim Richardson CH2M HILL

QAQC Leader Heather BroomeCH2M HILL

Project and Document Management Website

As a portion of project management the team will establish a web-based IT framework that provides centralized access to software tools and data These software tools will directly support and enhance Arkansas River Corridor Project management and oversight activities for selected components of the program and related projects

The specific scope of this task is to design develop and implement a secure and role based web portal that provides the following capabilities

bull document file and image management

bull access to project data

bull communication tools - announcements and discussions

bull project-level calendar

bull contact directory and

bull Access to the project specific links

ARC_SuppStudyEISsupporLAttachmentB_20140108

COPYRIGHT 204 8Y CH2M HILl INCbull COWANY CONFIDENTIAl

18

ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR PROJECT SUPPLEPoENTAL STUDIES AND EIS SUPPORT

CH2M HILL will host the Project and Document Management Portal on CH2M HILL servers to facilitate portal access for the project teams including contractors and subs The project provides for requirements assessment design user training a Help Desk function and operational support for the system

CH2M HILL will work with the project team to identify key program and document management requirements which will be applied to the website design Key elements of the project requirements such as workflow organization content access and policy will be discovered and integrated into the final website CH2M HILL will also apply guidelines drawn from the AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) Practitioners Handbook that are deemed feasible and appropriate by the project team

The project teams development approach to meeting the goal and scope of the Project and Documents Management Portal is to leverage commercial industry-leading software (Le Microsoft Share Point) with minimal customization A primary benefit of this approach is that it provides the Arkansas River Corridor Project with needed program and project tools within a short delivery time frame while still establishing a scalable solution

Assumptions

bull CH2M HILL will host the web site and provide hardware support for system issues CH2M HILL will be responsible for the application CH2M HILL will develop the site layout and style

bull Commercial software tools for document management contacts calendar and communication tools can be used with minimal customization

bull There will be no more than 4 levels of access to the PM portal (ex project teamCore Contractors Sub-Contractors Developers Public)

bull Out of the box functions for calendar announcements contacts and discussions will be sufficient no custom coding required

bull No integration with other software packages will be required

Deliverables

bull Website requirements analysis

bull Web site design and layout

bull Project and Document Management web site

bull Web site training

bull 6 Months Help Desk and Operations Support for web site for County use

Task Leader Sudha Dasari CH2M HILL

QAQC Leader Shelly SipesCH2M HILL

ARC_SuppStudyEISsupporCAttachmenIB_20140108 9

COPYRIGHT 2014 BY CH2M HILL INCbull COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL

ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR PROJECT SUPPLEtpoundNTAL STUDIESAHD E1S SUPPORT

Task 9 Section 404 Permitting Support

Task 9 includes development of a conceptual design and provision of 404 permitting support for the South Tulsa Jenks component of the Arkansas River Corridor Project As summarized below this task includes (1) the preparation of concept design drawings (2) the delineation of wetlands and preparation of a preliminary jurisdictional waters report (3) mitigation planning (4) preparation of the 404 permit application and supplemental information and (5) meetings and agency coordination

91 Concept Design The purpose of this task is to develop concept design drawings (equivalent to 15design completion) to support the 404 permit application concept review by stakeholders and the associated EIS In preliminary meetings with the USACE the staff indicated that this level of detail would be sufficient for this permitting effort and to trigger the EIS The Concept Design will be completed for the South TulsaJenks project site and will be coordinated with local municipal staff and their engineers to assure that local recommendations and needs are considered

CH2M HILL will base the concept design on the original concepts discussed in the development of the Preliminary Project Management Plan (PPMP) including the location and primary componentselements An initial meeting will be held with PMg and the South TulsaJenks and Tulsa County staff to review the original concept and confirm that the base conditions are essentially the same CH2M HILL will then develop the draft preliminary concept drawings with the assistance of LandPlan for review and discussion A series of up to three (for a total of four meetings) follow up meetings will be held with the South TulsaJenks staff to review the drawings before finalizing for use in the permit application and Hydrologic analysis Meshek will utilize the existing model to assess the potential hydrologic impacts of the final concept design the results will be provided as part of the 404 permit A brief concept design report and associated engineering drawings will be prepared to support the application and EIS An initial planning level cost estimate (+50 -30) will also be developed

Assumptions

bull The concept design report will be approximately 10 pages (not including appendices) consisting of

o Purpose o Background o Major Design Criteria o Major Construction ConstraintsCoordination Items o Opinion of Probable Construction Cost

bull No geotechnical investigations or FEMA Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) are included in this scope

20

COPYRIGHT 2014 BY CH2M HILL INC COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL

ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR PROJECT SUPPLE~NTALSTUDIES AND EtS SUPPORT

Deliverables

bull Concept Design Report - 5 bound copies and 3 CD copies

bull Concept Design Drawings - 5 bound copies (11 x 17 format) and 3 CD copies

Task Leader Lars OstervoldjCH2M HILL

QAQC Leader Rick Riker jCH2M HILL

Subconsultant Support LandPlan Meshek amp Associates

92 Wetland Delineation and Report

CH2M HILL will prepare a jurisdictional waters report compliant with the USACEs JD Instructional Guidebook and 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual including applicable regional supplement) A limited field survey will be completed in the immediate area of the proposed low water dam and the upstream impoundment

The report will provide descriptions and classifications of wetlands (following the US Fish and Wildlife Service classification system developed by Cowardin et al 1979) photographs of wetlands and surrounding uplands maps depicting the location of each wetland and the approved jurisdictional forms Following incorporation of PMg review a final report will be prepared and submitted to the Tulsa District USACE for approval and wetland boundary (and waters of the US) verification

Assumptions

bull A professional field (metes and bounds) survey of wetland boundaries will not be required A combination of hand-held GPS field data (meeting USACE guidelines) and existing topographic contour data will be adequate to map potential wetlands in the project area Maps will be prepared as overlays on an aerial photo background

Deliverables

bull A Potentially Jurisdictional Waters Report with jurisdictional determination forms

Task Leader Anna Childers jCH2M HILL

QAQC Leader Doug Baughman jCH2M HILL

ARC_SuppStudyEISsupporLAttachmentB_20140108

COPYRIGHT 2014 BY CH2M HIll INCbullbull CotfANY CONFIDENTIAL

21

ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR PROJECT SUPPLBIENTAl SruDlES AND ElS SUPPORT

93 Mitigation Planning It is likely that mitigation will be required to address USFWS concerns about least tern habitat and potential impacts on wetlands CH2M HILL will coordinate with the USFWS and the USACE to review the initial preliminary concept drawings and potential impacts on least tern habitat andor wetlands Based on agency feedback CH2M HILL will prepare brief technical memoranda on the options for least term habitat and wetland mitigation

Assumptions

bull A full Biological Assessment will not be required for this application (A biological assessment will be required for the EIS and is included in another task)

bull One meeting will be held with the USACE and USFWS to review the preliminary concepts for the project and review potential impacts and mitigation options

bull It is anticipated that a mix of on and off-site mitigation will be required bull A limited mitigation plan will be sufficient to complete the 404 application Maps of

potential mitigation areas and written description will be sufficient for the Section 404 application to be considered complete for public notice No design drawings would be required

Deliverables

bull A draft and final mitigation memo for least tern habitat bull A draft and final wetlands mitigation memo

Task Leader Anna ChildersCH2M HILL

QAQC Leaders Doug BaughmanCH2M HILL

94 Clean Water Act Section 404 Permitting Support The purpose of this task is to support preparation of the permit application and coordination with the USACE during the permitting process The work elements of this task that CH2M HILL will perform are listed below

CH2M HILL will prepare the sect404 permit application and supplemental information for submittal to the Tulsa District of the USACE which will trigger the need for NEP A analysis and that this NEP A analysis will be performed for the entire corridor Documentation would be expected to include a discussion of the alternatives analyses and its compliance with sect404(b) (1) guidance the final recommended project alternative the jurisdictional waters report and previous documentation prepared for the Arkansas River Corridor Project The sect401 Water Quality Certification administered by the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) is a prerequisite for receipt of a sect404 permit It is assumed that the water quality modeling and coordination with ODEQ conducted by INCOG under separate scope will provide the information necessary for ODEQ to complete the sect401 Water Quality Certification All correspondence and regulatory documents will be submitted to

ARC_SuppStudyEISsuppor1jttachmenlB_20140108 22

COPYRIGHT 201 BY CH2M HIll INCbullbull COIIPNlf CONFIDENnAL

ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDORPROJECT SUPPtetENTALSTUDlES AND 8S SUPPORT

PMg for review prior to distribution to an agency CH2M HILL will address review comments and incorpomte agreed-upon changes into the final deliverables

Assumptions

bull The Regulatory Branch of the Tulsa USACE will likely have questions regarding the application and supplemental documentation A total of 4 conference calls are anticipated to address potential requests for additional information One meeting will be held with USACE staff and PMg to review the draft application TItis meeting will be attended by the project manager

Deliverables

bull Potentially Jurisdictional Waters Report with jurisdictional determination forms

bull Draft and Final Permit application and supplemental materials

bull One memo responding to requests for information or clarification

Task Leader Anna Childers CH2M HILL

QAQC Leader Doug Baughman CH2M HILL

95 Section 404 Meetings and Agency Coordination To facilitate the agency review and acceptance of the 404 permit application as complete additional meetings will likely be required Under this task CH2M HILL will prepare to attend additional meetings (over and above the meetings outlined in the tasks above) with the USACE USFWS or local entities (Tulsa County City of Tulsa or others) to address potential questions or obtain supplemental information for the application and supporting documentation

Assumptions

bull Meetings will be attended by the local task leader and (as needed) a senior technical staff member

bull No public meeting will be required by the USACE to complete their determination on potential environmental impacts and the need for an EIS

bull Up to 160 hours have been allotted to this task Time required above this level of effort for additional meetings would require written approval

Deliverables

bull Meeting minutes from each of the agency meetings

bull Preparation of meeting agendas and presentations

Task Leader Anna Childers CH2M HILL

QAQC Leader Doug Baughman CH2M HILL

COPYRIGHT 2014 BY CH2M HILJ INCbullbull eotFAttfCONFIDENllAL

23

Scope Modification - Arkansas River Corridor project Supplemental Studies and EIS Support

Scope Task

Task Original Task

Total Amount Task

Changed Expense

Remaining Subs

Remaining Travel

Remaining Revised Task Total

11 EIS Agreement $3023 $ 4191 $0 $0 $0 $7214 12 project Coordination $29000 $ 12572 $14 $0 $0 $41572 13 Doc Review Mlgs $2Om $ 14796 $28 $0 $2250 $35573 21 Public Scoping $83626 $ (76215) $0 $0 $0 $7411 22 Agervy Consultation $26353 $ (10278) $28 $0 $0 $16075 3 OataColection $31995 $ (9506) $30 $7620 $0 $22489

41 Bixby Project Infonnation $39376 $ - $70 $5000 $0 $39376 42 Bixby Conceptual Engineering $149857 $ - $252 $102985 $300 $149857 43 east Tem Bio Assessment Suppor $70940 $ - $280 $0 $2620 $70940 44 Cultural Resource Swvey $62864 $ - $0 $41000 $5000 $82864 45 Hydrologic Study $109052 $ $147 $79730 $0 $109052 46 Preliminary Cost Estimate $57247 $ - $210 $0 $0 $57247 47 Economic Studies $55441 $ - $2500 $0 $0 $55441 51 OOPAA $52643 $ (25337) $105 $15000 $0 $27306 52 Alemative EvaI $45173 $ (45173) $0 $0 $0 $0

53 Existing Conditions $111391 $ (31440) $336 $0 $0 $79951 54 Environmental Analysis $42292 $ (42292) $0 $0 $0 $0

55 ConsuIation I Coordination $27621 $ (27621) $0 $0 $0 $0 56 Prelim Draft EIS $29739 $ (29739) $0 $0 $0 $0 57 OraftEIS $25637 $ (25637) $0 $0 $0 $0 6 Final EIS $50706 $ (50706) $0 $0 $0 $0

71 Notice of Intent $8954 $ (6954) $0 $0 $0 $0 72 Record of Decision $13302 $ (13302) $0 $0 $0 $0 73 Administrative Record $14153 $ (14153) $0 $0 $0 $0 81 Proj MgmtlAdminlWorkshopsIQA $76730 $ 33784 $54 $0 $0 $110514 82 PM Website I GIS $41305 $ (19440) $0 $9000 $0 $21865

SUblotaI Original Scope Tasks $1277196 ($362451) $4053 $260335 $10170 $914746

91 Concept Design $108205 $70 $45000 $0 $108205

92 wean Delineation $29n5 $2605 $0 $1500 $29725 93 Mitigation Planning $13129 $28 $0 $0 $13129 94 Permit Application $19894 $0 $0 $0 $19894 95 Meetings $27494 $42 $0 $2500 $27494

Subtotal Additional Tasks Total

$198448

($164001) $3311

$7364 $45000

$305335 $4000

$14170

$198448

$1113195

CH2M HILL Confidential 182014

DRAFTArkansas River Corridor Projects Regulatory EIS Scenario 10 0 Task Name 2914 2015 2016 2017

Qlr4 Qr 1 Otr~ 9tr~ Qtr4Qtr ~ gtr2 4tll~~ 9tr OIrJ 9t2 air 3 air 4 bull qJ air 2 Qtr 3 ~Ma Rivet PraJKi__1at8rtas Approach o e

8 PlOJeded Start I NTP 1113

3 PnIpardon or I sctIon 404 AppHcdon (Dec 2013 SOW ~ Conduct Potentially Junsdicfional Wrltet5 DelineationIshy ~~ S SUbmit Potential Junsdlcljonal WrIters DelIneation Report to the USACE

6 Pnspare SectIOn 404 ApfIIIcatIon (and poutbly Section 404(b)(1) Report) T ~ 7 Submit ApplicatiOn to the USACE I~ 8 USACE Evalulles Application for Completeness and Issues PubItc Noticereg-

L9 USACE Detemunes NEPA Documentation ReqUIrements (EA versus EIS) middot ~ ~ 10 I$gt USACE ISSUes IS8U8S WIIh IXlIIdiCIons or denies the SecIlon 404 Permit

11 Complete Supplemenlal Studies for EIS (Dec 2013 SOW)

12 PNpIrition or In E1S (La_ PhI

29

Final EngInHring (Laler PhI

30 OetaUedlFinal OnIgn

~ -- - t-----------

1 of1