Tuesday, 26/07/2011, Vancouver, Canada, IGARSS 2011 INFLUENCE OF SPECKLE FILTERING OF POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA ON DIFFERENT CLASSIFICATION METHODS Fang Cao 1 , Charles-Alban Deledalle 1 , Jean- Marie Nicolas 1 , Florence Tupin 1 , Loïc Denis 2 , Laurent Ferro-Famil 3 , Eric Pottier 3 , Carlos López-Martínez 4 1 Institut Télécom, Télécom ParisTech, France 2 Université de Lyon, France 3 Université de Rennes 1, France 4 Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Spain
INFLUENCE OF SPECKLE FILTERING OF POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA ON DIFFERENT CLASSIFICATION METHODS. Fang Cao 1 , Charles-Alban Deledalle 1 , Jean-Marie Nicolas 1 , Florence Tupin 1 , Loïc Denis 2 , Laurent Ferro-Famil 3 , Eric Pottier 3 , Carlos López-Martínez 4 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
• Eigenvalue/eigenvector calculation of the coherency matrix of fully polarimetric SAR data.
• Covering the whole range of scattering mechanisms
• Automatically basis invariant.
Telecom ParisTech
Probability of each 3 scattering mechanism
Entropy H: the global distribution of scattering mechanism
angle: the type of scattering mechanism
Anisotropy A : the two least important scattering mechanism effects
Cloude-Pottier Decomposition
Telecom ParisTech
b
Refined Lee IDAN NL-PolSARSan Francisco by JPL L–Band AIRSAR
Entropy
Alpha
Anisotropy
1.0
0
1.0
0
90°
0
Telecom ParisTech
Entropy
Alpha
Anisotropy
1.0
0
1.0
0
90°
0
b
Refined Lee IDAN NL-PolSAR
The refined Lee filter and the NLPolSAR filters have similar performance. The IDAN filter usually introduces bias in entropy and anisotropy values, which may result to unreliable classification results.
• Based on the complex Wishart distribution of coherency matrix
• Use maximum likelihood criterion
: the trace of a matrix
The Wishart H / Classification
Distance measure
V : the cluster center coherency matrix
Maximum likelihood criterion
Telecom ParisTech
Decomposition and classification
page 19
AIRSAR ALOS/PALSAR Radarsat–2
Refined LEE
NL-PolSAR
Telecom ParisTech
Decomposition and classification
page 20
AIRSAR ALOS/PALSAR Radarsat–2
Refined LEE
NL-PolSAR
The results of AIRSAR, ALOS/PALSAR and RadarSat-2 data show that the classification results with different sensors are quite similar, except the water area in the AIRSAR data, which is due to the big variation of the incidence angle of the airborne sensor.
Telecom ParisTech
The NL-PolSAR filter has better performance than the refined Lee filter, for example, thegolf course areas and the lakes in the AIRSAR classification results.
Telecom ParisTechpage 22
Index
Index
Introduction
Speckle filtering
Decomposition and classification
Conclusion
Telecom ParisTech
Conclusion
• Comparison of 3 speckle filters:
Refined Lee’s filter, IDAN filter and the NL-PolSAR filter• Comparison of the influence on decomposition and