Blatant Plagiarism By Joe Henson, Raymond Lal, Matthew F.PuseyTo
whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point out
that the following paper is blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent
limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian
networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe Henson (Imperial
College London),Raymond Lal (University of Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey
(Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.
To whom it may concern and for the record, I would like to point
out that the following paper is blatant
plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.To whom it may concern and for the
record, I would like to point out that the following paper is
blatant plagiarism.Theory-independent limits on correlations from
generalised Bayesian networks(http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2572) byJoe
Henson (Imperial College London),Raymond Lal (University of
Oxford),Matthew F. Pusey (Perimeter Institute)
I wrotemy first paper on Quantum Bayesian Networks (qbnets)in
1995. Since then, I have writtenquite a fewpapers about qbnets.
This blog, which has been going on for 6 years, is named Quantum
Bayesian Networks. And yet, these people claim to be the inventors
of qbnets. They dont cite a single paper of mine. They also claim
to be the first to extend d-separation to the quantum regime, but I
did that long ago inthis paper.