Top Banner
TUBULENT FLUXES OF HEAT, MOISTURE AND MOMENTUM: PRACTICE OF PARAMETERIZATIONS ) ( ), ( , 0 0 2 q q C L Q C C Q u C z q q z t p h z d Bulk formulae: m u q q q q m u t t t t m u d z z z z C z z z z C z z C 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 2 0 2 ln ln , ln ln ln q q dn qn dn d tn t t t dn tn dn d tn t u m u dn dn d z C C C C C C z C C C C C C L z z C C C 10 ln 1 , 10 ln 1 , 10 ln 1 1 2 / 1 2 / 1 Thus, we need to know either roughness length, or neutral transfer coefficients to determine the fluxes!
15

TUBULENT FLUXES OF HEAT, MOISTURE AND MOMENTUM: PRACTICE OF PARAMETERIZATIONS Bulk formulae: Thus, we need to know either roughness length, or neutral.

Dec 16, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: TUBULENT FLUXES OF HEAT, MOISTURE AND MOMENTUM: PRACTICE OF PARAMETERIZATIONS Bulk formulae: Thus, we need to know either roughness length, or neutral.

TUBULENT FLUXES OF HEAT, MOISTURE AND MOMENTUM: PRACTICE OF PARAMETERIZATIONS

)(

),(

,

0

0

2

qqCLQ

CCQ

uC

zqq

ztph

zd

Bulk formulae:

mu

qq

qq

mu

tt

tt

mu

d

z

z

z

zC

z

z

z

zC

z

zC

0

1

0

2

1

0

1

0

2

2

0

2

lnln

,lnln

ln

qqdnqn

dnd

tn

t

ttdntn

dnd

tn

t

umudndn

d

zCC

CC

C

C

zCC

CC

C

C

LzzCC

C

10ln1

,10ln1

,10ln1

1

2/1

2/1

Thus, we need to know either roughness length, or neutral transfer coefficients to determine the fluxes!

Page 2: TUBULENT FLUXES OF HEAT, MOISTURE AND MOMENTUM: PRACTICE OF PARAMETERIZATIONS Bulk formulae: Thus, we need to know either roughness length, or neutral.

V

Cdn

Cd (unstable)

Cd (stable)

~10-3

To measure the flux (eddy correlation or inertial dissipation) under the neutral conditions and the mean variables simultaneously;

To derive experimental dependence of the neutral transfer coefficient on the wind speed;

To apply stability correction functions and to derive coefficients for different stability conditions.

1. Typical approach: parameterization from measurements

Page 3: TUBULENT FLUXES OF HEAT, MOISTURE AND MOMENTUM: PRACTICE OF PARAMETERIZATIONS Bulk formulae: Thus, we need to know either roughness length, or neutral.

33310 106.1,102.1,0144.0,10)067.075.0( etd CCUC

4. Smith and Banke (1975), Smith (1980), Smith (1988) – eddy correlation measurements with a thrust anemometer at a platform offshore US West coast. Stability correction: Bussinger et al. (1973), Dyer (1974), Paulson (1970).

Parameterizations derived from field measurements:

Kruegermeyer (1976) – 124 hours of profile measurements in the tropics.

)394.01(20.1),455.01(42.1,)(

55.3),331.01(34.1210

10 RiCRiCu

SSTRiRiC etd

Hasse et al. (1978) – 1400 hours of profile measurements in the Tropical Atlantic (coefficients for neutral conditions)

15.1,34.1,25.1 enetntdnd CCCCCC

012.0,20.1,00.1),063.061.0( 10 entndn CCuC

Garratt (1977) for the momentum flux + Garratt and Hyson (1975) for sensible and latent fluxes. About 790 eddy correlation measurements in different conditions from different platforms.

Page 4: TUBULENT FLUXES OF HEAT, MOISTURE AND MOMENTUM: PRACTICE OF PARAMETERIZATIONS Bulk formulae: Thus, we need to know either roughness length, or neutral.

15.1,,75.0

,13.1

0346.0,,018.0

,0327.0

/10065.049.0

/1014.1

2/1

2/1

2/1

1010

10

entn

dnen

dn

dntn

dn

Cstable

unstableC

CCstableC

unstableCC

smuu

smuC

Smith 88 Large and Pond (1981, 1982) – same platform as Smith (1980, 1988), eddy correlation + inertial dissipation measurements. Additionally ship measurements in the Atlantic and Pacific were used.

Scatter was slightly better for the neutral coefficients for heat and moisture dependent on Cdn, than for the constant coefficients.

Page 5: TUBULENT FLUXES OF HEAT, MOISTURE AND MOMENTUM: PRACTICE OF PARAMETERIZATIONS Bulk formulae: Thus, we need to know either roughness length, or neutral.

2. Modelling of surface atmospheric layer to determine exchange coefficients

Liu, Katsaros and Bussinger (1979) (LKB) – surface renewal theory.

Surface renewal theory was first introduced in chemical engineering and has been applied to air-sea interface by Liu and Bussinger (1975) and Liu et al. (1979).

Main assumption: Whereas the atmospheric (and oceanic) surface boundary layer transports heat, mass and momentum to the interface by turbulent motions, at the surface itself there exists an interfacial layer of order 1 mm thick, in which molecular diffusion plays a significant role in the transport.

Across this interfacial layer, small eddies of air transfer heat randomly and intermittently between the “bulk” turbulent fluid, of temperature Tb, and the surface itself which therefore warms or cools by conduction from the eddies.

Page 6: TUBULENT FLUXES OF HEAT, MOISTURE AND MOMENTUM: PRACTICE OF PARAMETERIZATIONS Bulk formulae: Thus, we need to know either roughness length, or neutral.

2

2

z

Tk

t

Tt

The temperature gradient and the surface heat flux are determined by the heat conduction equation:

The solution for initial condition T(t=0) = Tb = constant, and surface

temperature T(z=0) = Ts = constant:

2/10 )(

)(),0(

tk

TTCk

z

TCktH

t

bspt

zpt

Liu and Businger (1975) introduced a function to describe the areal fraction of eddies which have been in contact with the surface for time t, and assume a characteristic time, tc, for which an eddy remains in contact with the surface

before breaking away. For constant Ts and a random distribution of contact

duration the time-averaged temperature profile in the interfacial layer:

2/1)(exp1

)(

)(

ctsb

s

tk

z

TT

TT - LKB flux-profile relationship

2/1)(

)(

ct

bspt

tk

TTCkH

Thermal diffusivity

- heat flux

and an average heat flux:

Page 7: TUBULENT FLUXES OF HEAT, MOISTURE AND MOMENTUM: PRACTICE OF PARAMETERIZATIONS Bulk formulae: Thus, we need to know either roughness length, or neutral.

Values of the exchange coefficients for LKB, as functions of wind speed and stability

Page 8: TUBULENT FLUXES OF HEAT, MOISTURE AND MOMENTUM: PRACTICE OF PARAMETERIZATIONS Bulk formulae: Thus, we need to know either roughness length, or neutral.

Variations of coefficients from different schemes Differences in behaviour of the coeeficients with wind are in general larger than with stability, at least for moderate and strong winds

The largest uncertainty in stability is observed under small winds

Typical variations:

Cd, Ct, Ce ~ 0.5x103

Recommendations: Do not hesitate to use simple paramterizations; Try to rely more on parameterizations derived from field observations Under the calm or low winds use LKB, if ……[LATER]!!!!! Never say “The best parameterization is done by XXXX” – they are all very uncertaint Smith (1988) is considered to be most reliable More or less “officially recommended” are Smith (1988), Large and Pond (1981, 1982), LKB (among these very simple parameterizaions)

Page 9: TUBULENT FLUXES OF HEAT, MOISTURE AND MOMENTUM: PRACTICE OF PARAMETERIZATIONS Bulk formulae: Thus, we need to know either roughness length, or neutral.

COARE-3.0 algorithm (Fairall et al. 2003)

universal schemes:modelling, surface

renewal theory

“field-only” schemes

ASTEX - White et al. (1995)

CATCH - Eymard et al. (1998)

FASTEX – Hare et al. (1995)

LabSea: Bumke et al. (2002)

Clayson et al. (1996)

Zeng et al. (1998)

Beljaars (1995)

Bourassa et al. (1996)

Page 10: TUBULENT FLUXES OF HEAT, MOISTURE AND MOMENTUM: PRACTICE OF PARAMETERIZATIONS Bulk formulae: Thus, we need to know either roughness length, or neutral.

Based on the TOGA-COARE results and 2777 covariance flux measurements at the ETL;

Tested using 4439 new values from field experiments between 1997 and 1999 including the wind speed regime beyond 10 m; 

The average (mean and median) model results agreed with the measurements to within about 5% for moisture from 0 to 20 m.

COARE-3.0 algorithm (Fairall et al. 2003)

Page 11: TUBULENT FLUXES OF HEAT, MOISTURE AND MOMENTUM: PRACTICE OF PARAMETERIZATIONS Bulk formulae: Thus, we need to know either roughness length, or neutral.

(A)

(B)

Variations inturbulent fluxes

due to different

parameterizations

NorthAtlantic

Page 12: TUBULENT FLUXES OF HEAT, MOISTURE AND MOMENTUM: PRACTICE OF PARAMETERIZATIONS Bulk formulae: Thus, we need to know either roughness length, or neutral.

/helios/u2/gulev/handout:

lapo3.for - Large and Pond (1981, 1982) –with German commentsliu3.for – LKB (Liu, Katsaros and Bussinger 1979)potsmin1.for - Smith (1988)

(all codes are for water vapor pressure, i.e. ez and not q)

Compute the fluxes of sensible heat, latent heat and momentum for the following conditions:

SST=10C, Ta=8C, ez=9mb, V=7m/s, Pa=1010mbSST=10C, Ta=12C, ez=11mb, V=7m/s, Pa=1010mbSST=10C, Ta=8C, ez=9mb, V=3m/s, Pa=1010mbSST=10C, Ta=8C, ez=9mb, V=12m/s, Pa=1010mb

Page 13: TUBULENT FLUXES OF HEAT, MOISTURE AND MOMENTUM: PRACTICE OF PARAMETERIZATIONS Bulk formulae: Thus, we need to know either roughness length, or neutral.

/helios/u2/gulev/handout/

(for the same parameter values)

flux_test.f –

program to compute instantaneous values of urbulent fluxes, using Liu et al. (1979), Large and pond (1981, 1982) and Simth (1988) schemes.

Compilation:

f77 –o flux_test flux_test.f lapo3.for liu3.for potsmin1.for

Results:

flux.res

Page 14: TUBULENT FLUXES OF HEAT, MOISTURE AND MOMENTUM: PRACTICE OF PARAMETERIZATIONS Bulk formulae: Thus, we need to know either roughness length, or neutral.

ReferencesBlanc, T.V., 1985: Variation of bulk-derived surface flux, stability and roughness results due to the use of different transfer coefficient schemes. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 15, 650-669.Blackadar, A., 1998: Turbulence and diffusion in th eatmosphere. Springer-Verlag, 186 pp.Blanc, T.V., 1987: Accuracy of bulk-method determined flux, stability, and sea surface roughness. J. Geophys. Res., 92, 3867-3876. Bumke, K., U.Karger, and K.Uhlig, 2002: Measurements of turbulent fluxes of momentum and sensible heat over the Labrador Sea. J.Phys. Oceanogr, 32, 401-410.da Silva, A.M., C.C. Young, and S.Levitus, 1994: Atlas of surface marine data. NOAA Atlas NESDIS 6, Volume 1-6, US Dept. Commerce, NODC, NOAA/NESDIS, Washington DC.Dyer, A.J., 1974: A review of flux-profile relationships, Bound.-Layer Meteor., 7, 363-372.Eymard, L., G. Caniaux, H.Dupuis, L.Prieur, H.Giordani, R.Troadec, P.Bessemoulin, G. Lachaud, G.Bouhours, D.Bourras, C.Guerin, P.LeBrogne, A.Brisson, and A. Marsouin, 1999: Surface fluxes in the North Atlantic current during CATCH/FASTEX. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 3563-3599.Fairall, C. W., E. F. Bradley, D. P. Rogers, J. B. Edson, and G. S. Young, 1996: Bulk parameterization of air-sea fluxes for Tropical Ocean-Global Atmosphere Coupled-Ocean Atmosphere Response Experiment. J. Geophys. Res., 101, 3747-3764.Geernaert, G., and W.J.Plant, 1990: Surface waves and fluxes. Kluwer AP, 2 volumes.Golitsyn, G.S., and A.A.Grachov, 1986: Free convection of multi-component media and parameterization of air-sea interaction at light winds. Ocean-Air Interactions, 1, 57-78.Grachov, A.A., and G. Panin, 1984: Sensible and latent heat flux parameterization over water surface under natural conditions. Izv. Acad. Sci. USSR. Atmos. Oceanic. Phys. 20, 364-371.Hasse, L., 1971: The sea surface temperature deviation and the heat flow at the sea-air interface. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 1, 368-379.Hasse, L., and S.D. Smith, 1997: Local sea surface wind, wind stress, and sensible and latent heat fluxes. J.Climate, 10, 2711-2724.Isemer, H.-J., and L. Hasse, 1987: The Bunker Climate Atlas of the North Atlantic Ocean. Vol. 2, Air-Sea Interactions, Springer-Verlag, 252 pp.

Page 15: TUBULENT FLUXES OF HEAT, MOISTURE AND MOMENTUM: PRACTICE OF PARAMETERIZATIONS Bulk formulae: Thus, we need to know either roughness length, or neutral.

References-continueJosey, S., E.C.Kent, and P.K.Taylor, 1999: New insights into the ocean heat budget closure problem from analysis of the SOC air-sea flux climatology. J. Climate, 12, 2856-2880.The LabSea Group, 1998: The Labrador Sea Deep convection Experiment. Bull Amer. Met. Soc., 79, 2033-2058.Large, W.G., and S.Pond, 1981: Open ocean momentum flux measurements in moderate to strong winds. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 11, 324-336.Large, W.G., and S.Pond, 1982: Sensible and latent heat fluxes over the ocean. J.Phys.Oceanogr., 12, 463-482.Liu, W.T., K.Katsaros, and J.Businger, 1979: Bulk parameterization of air-sea exchanges of heat and water vapor including molecular constraints at the interface. J.Atmos.Sci., 36, 1722-1735.Oberhuber, J.M., 1988: An Atlas based on the COADS data set: the budgets of heat, buoyancy and turbulent kinetic energy at the surface of the global ocean. MPI fuer Meteorologie report, No. 15, 19pp. [Available from Max-Plank-Institute fuer Meteorologie, Bundesstrasse 55, Hamburg, Germany].Paulson, C.A., 1970: Representation of wind speed and temperature profiles in the unstable atmospheric surface layer. J. Appl. Meteor., 9, 857-861.Renfrew, J., G.W.K. Moore, P.S. Guest and K. Bumke, 2002: A comparison of surface-layer, surface heat flux and surface momentum flux observations over the Labrador Sea with ECMWF analyses and NCEP reanalyses. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 32, 383-400Smith, S.D., 1980: Wind stress and heat flux over the ocean in gale force winds. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 10, 709-726.Smith, S.D., 1988: Coefficients for sea surface wind stress, heat flux and wind profiles as a function of wind speed and temperature. J.Geophys. Res., 93, 15467-15474.Stull., R., An introduction to boundary layer meteorology. Kluwer AP, 667 pp.Yelland, M.J., B.I.Moat, P.K.Taylor, R.W.Pascal, J.Hutchings, and V.C.Cornell, 1998: Wind stress measurements from the open ocean corrected for air flow disturbance by the ship. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 28, 1511-1526.Zeng, X., M. Zhao, and R. Dickinson, 1998: Intercomparison of bulk aerodynamic algorithms for the computation of sea surface fluxes using TOGA COARE and TAO data. J.Climate, 11, 2628-2644.