Top Banner
THRUST TO WEIGHT RATIO AND ASPECT RATIO Nguyễn Anh Tuấn Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering [email protected] om (+84) (0) 944 113 787 TSL_Oct2010
12

Tsl Thrust to Weight ratio and Aspect Ratio

Nov 07, 2014

Download

Documents

Tuan Shipland

 
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Tsl Thrust to Weight ratio and Aspect Ratio

THRUST TO WEIGHT RATIOAND ASPECT RATIO

Nguyễn Anh TuấnNaval Architecture and

Marine Engineering [email protected]

(+84) (0) 944 113 787

TSL_Oct2010

Page 2: Tsl Thrust to Weight ratio and Aspect Ratio

T/W Ratio

T/W ratio estimates:• Part of the takeoff distance• Rate of climb• Maximum velocity

http://www.centennialofflight.gov/essay/Theories_of_Flight/Performance_Class2/TH25G1.htm

Page 3: Tsl Thrust to Weight ratio and Aspect Ratio

Takeoff distance = sg + sa = 2500 ftAccording eq. [6.95] (see [1]), Ground Roll sg

For FlapPlain Flap deflection 20o for takeoff (see table 5.3 [1])Section maximum lift coeffient (cl)max of 45o flap deflection is 0.9 (see Fig.5.28, [1])(cl)max = 0.9 (20/45) ~ 0.5 (For linear changes)

For the whole of wing, average (cl)max = 1.7 + 0.5 = 2.2

3D- effect of the finite aspect ratio

Raymer, Ref [25] of [1]

Page 4: Tsl Thrust to Weight ratio and Aspect Ratio

The liftoff velocity

Flight path radius

Velocity of airplane

Flight path angle == 50 ft : obstacle height

Airborn distance

Takeoff distance = sg + sa = 2500 ft

Requirement powerPA =

Note: 550ft.lb/s = 1hp

Power of the takeoff constraint ≥ 119 hp

Shaft brake power

Gross takeoff weight = 5,158lb

Page 5: Tsl Thrust to Weight ratio and Aspect Ratio

(cl)max

T/W W/S(Cl)max

sg

Vstall

R

sa

𝜃𝑂𝐵

T/W

VLO

V

PR = PA

P

Wo

T/W ratio and Aspect ratio

Effects

Page 6: Tsl Thrust to Weight ratio and Aspect Ratio

Maximum Rate of climb (R/C)max = 1000ft/min = 16.67 ft/s at sea levelSingle-engine general aviation airplanesThe ratio of wetted area to the wing referenece area Swet/Sref = 4 (See fig. 2.54, [1])The skin –friction coefficent (for early jet fighters) Cfe = 0.0043 corressponds to Reynolds number Re = 107 (See fig 2.55, [1])

Page 7: Tsl Thrust to Weight ratio and Aspect Ratio

The zero-lift drag coefficient (the zero-lift parasite drag coefficient)

The drag polar for airplane

The drag due to lift (downwash and so on)

The span efficiency factor to account for a nonelliptical lift distribution

along the span of the wing e

The coefficient

Based on data from famous existing airplanes, estimating a reasonable first approximation for maximum of Lift to Drag ratio for 4-6 peoples aircraft (See p.403 [1])

= = 0.075

A reasonable estimate The Oswald efficiency eo for a low-wing general aircrafts is 0.6 (See p.415 [1]) =7.07

Page 8: Tsl Thrust to Weight ratio and Aspect Ratio

Maximum rate of climb for a propeller-driven airplane

Shaft Brake Power for the constraint of rate of climb

W/SK Wo

Aspect Ratio

Page 9: Tsl Thrust to Weight ratio and Aspect Ratio

Themaximum velocity V = Vmax = 250 mi/h = 366.7 ft/h at midcruise weight and level flight 20,000ftIn level flight T=D

The weight at maximum velocity is less than the weight at takeoff stage

The midcruise weight WMC

Estimating the weight fraction

Page 10: Tsl Thrust to Weight ratio and Aspect Ratio

Gross takeoff weight = 5,158lb

For a propeller-driven aircraft, we use power to weight ratioFor a jet aircraft, we use thrust to weight ratioT/W and P/W are same mean

Page 11: Tsl Thrust to Weight ratio and Aspect Ratio

Thank you!

Page 12: Tsl Thrust to Weight ratio and Aspect Ratio

References

[1] John D. Anderson, Jr. 1999. Aircraft Performance and Design. McGraw-Hill[2] E. L. Houghton and N. B. Carruthers. 1986. Aerodynamics for Engineering Students. 3rd edition. Thomson Press