Company Confidential 10/4/ 99 1
Company Confidential 10/4/99 1
Company Confidential 10/4/99 2
Troubleshooting with HP E74XX
Blocked CallsPoor Quality and Drop callsAbnormal HandoversInterferenceTermination Failures
Company Confidential 10/4/99 3
Blocked CallTroubleshooting
Company Confidential 10/4/99 4
Blocked CallsBlocked Calls can occur due to :
•Access Failures•SDCCH Congestion•SDCCH Drop•TCH Congestion
Trouble shooting cause :•Use Layer 3 messages to analyze the cause•Decode System Information Type 3 messages.•Note the parameter , “max_retransmission” ; “CCCH CONF” and “BS_AG_BLKS_RES”•Analyze the blocked call reason using L3 messages
Company Confidential 10/4/99 5
Blocked Call Analysis - L3 messages
1 3
Channel Request Channel RequestRACH .
: Imm AssignmentRACHmax_retrans Service Request
NO RESPONSE FROM N/WACCESS FAILURE ! Signalling
:Signalling
2NO TCH ASSIGNMENT
Channel Request Mobile Returns To IdleRACH TCH BLOCKED !
Imm Assign Reject
SDCCH BLOCKED !
Company Confidential 10/4/99 6
Timeslot - Testing
BT
TT7 6
1 0
……..
TT
TT……..
7 6
1 0BCH
TCH
•Activate Cell Barring from OMC.•Remove this cell from the neighbor list of other cells.
•Get the cell configuration•ARFCN’s and Timeslots configured for TCH.
•For BCH carrier select the Timeslot and carry out the Testing
•For TCH Carriers: Block the BCH Timeslots from OMC•Carry out Timeslot testing.•If more than 1 TCH Carrier is activated, block all others .
Company Confidential 10/4/99 7
Dropped Call Troubleshooting
Company Confidential 10/4/99 8
Drop Calls Analysis1 2
Channel Request Channel Request
Imm Assignment Imm Assignment
Service Request Service Request
Signalling SDCCH Signalling: :
Signalling SpeechTCH
RLT = 0 ; DROPS RLT = 0 ; DROPSSDCCH DROP ! TCH DROP !
3 SDCCH / TCH
Handover Command
Hand Access
Handover Failure
HANDOVER FAILURE DROP !
Company Confidential 10/4/99 9
Drop Call - Analysis with HP E7475
Setting up Alarms can figure out the type of Drop
SDCCH Drop
Alarm : Value Phone State = Constant Dedicated AND
Value Access Time = Constant 0AND
Field Radio Link Counter = Constant 0 Current Value
TCH Drop
Alarm : Value Access Time > Constant 0OR
Value Phone State = Constant Wait on AnswerAND
Field Radio Link Counter = Constant 0 Current Value
Company Confidential 10/4/99 10
Dropped Call Analysis
• SDCCH Drops - Causes– Coverage– Interference & Multipath– BTS performance
• TCH Drops - Causes– Coverage– Interference & Multipath– BTS performance– Pre-emption
• Handover Failure - Causes– Threshold parameters– Missing neighbors
• Solutions to Dropped Calls– Optimize Coverage– Interference Management– Optimize neighbors– Optimize handover
parameters– Effective Frequency Hopping– Use of DTX & Power control
Company Confidential 10/4/99 11
Drop Call - Troubleshooting
RLT=0
RxQual > 4
YES
YES
YESYES
Troubleshoot Multipath/
Co-Channel/BSIC decode
TCH=BCH Pri/Int <= 9
C/IAa <= -9C/IAb <= -9
Co-Channel /MultipathInterference!!No
YESNo
No Adjacent Channel Interference!!
YES YES
Troubleshoot Source Cell
Using BCH Analyzer
L3 MessageAnalysis
No
Rx_Lev < -95
No **
Coverage Hole !!!
Uplink Problem !!!
No
Troubleshoot Link ImbalanceUL-Interference
TCH -Pri/Int <= 9
Optimize Neighbors/Coverage
YES
No
** If TCH is Hopping, then all causes needs to be verified further, before concluding on the root cause and optimizing.
YES
DROP CALL
Handover Attempted ?Handover Failed ?
Area of concern
No
MultipathNo
Company Confidential 10/4/99 12
Poor Quality
•Poor Speech Quality could be due to •Patchy Coverage ( holes)•No Target cell for Handover•Echo , Audio holes, Voice Clipping•Interference ---:
•Co-channel•Adjacent channel•External•Multipath•Noise
Company Confidential 10/4/99 13
Speech Quality Parameters
RxQUAL : Measured on the midamble.Indicates poor speech quality due to radio interface impairments
FER : Measured on the basis of BFI ( Ping -Pong effect on speech )Preferred under Frequency Hopping situation
Echo and distortion : Generally caused by the Transmission and switching system.
Audio holes : Blank period of speech, due to malfunctioning of Transcoder boards or PCM circuits.
Voice Clipping : Occurs due to improper implementation of DTX.
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) : ITU standard for estimating speech quality.
Company Confidential 10/4/99 14
Speech Quality ParametersMean Opinion Score
Criteria for Voice Quality : A set value “x” at which “y” percent of customersrate the voice quality at Circuit Merits(CM) 4 - 5.
MOS Quality Scale
5 Excellent ( speech perfectly understandable)
4 Good ( speech easily understandable, some noise)
3 Fair ( speech understandable with a slight effort,occasional repetitions needed)
2 Poor ( speech understandable only withconsiderable effort, frequent repetitions needed)
1 Unsatisfactory ( speech not understandable)
Company Confidential 10/4/99 15
Speech Quality - EstimationSpeech RxQual FER FH DTX Reason
BAD HIGH LOW NO NO Air Interface ImpairmentsBAD HIGH HIGH NO NO Severe Air Interface ImpairmentsBAD LOW HIGH NO NO Transmission and Switching system , TranscoderBAD LOW HIGH YES NO Air Interface ImpairmentsBAD GOOD HIGH YES NO Transmission and Switching system , Transcoder
GOOD HIGH LOW YES NO Hopping ImplementationCLIPPING LOW HIGH YES YES Hopping Implementation and VADCLIPPING LOW LOW YES YES VAD
ECHO LOW LOW Y/N Y/N Transmission and Switching system , Transcoder
MOS up to a certain extent can easily estimated by configuring an algorithm using the Alarms in the HP E74XX systems for the following elements, an example of subset of which is illustrated above
- RxQual Full and Sub- RxLev Full and Sub- FER and RLT- L3 Measurement Report- L3 Handover specfic messages
Company Confidential 10/4/99 16
Speech Quality - Troubleshooting
RxQual> 6
FER > 1%
YES
YES
YES
YES
Troubleshoot Multipath/
Co-Channel/BSIC decode
TCH=BCH Pri/Int <= 9
C/IAa <= -9C/IAb <= -9
Co-Channel Interference!!
No
YESNo
No Adjacent Channel Interference!!
YES YES
Troubleshoot Source Cell
Using BCH Analyzer
No
Rx_Lev < -95
No **
Coverage Hole !!!
Uplink Problem !!!
Troubleshoot Link ImbalanceUL-Interference
TCH -Pri/Int <= 9
Optimize Neighbors/Coverage
YES
No
** If TCH is in Hopping, then all interference causes needs to be verified further, before concluding on the root cause and optimizing.
YES
Poor Quality
Area of concern
Hopping ON
YES
RLT going down
DTX_DL ON
FER > 2%YES
No No
NoNo
Transmission/Switching SystemsTranscoder
Patchy Quality Multipath
High Probability with Hopping ON
YES
No A
A
BB
A
MOS < 4
No
Company Confidential 10/4/99 17
Troubleshooting Speech Quality with Post Processing
•Export the Plan Wizards to MAPINFO Compatible Text Files.
•First Open the QualPhoneData table in Mapinfo and create points and build the layer on your city MAP.
•Do the same thing for RcvrData and Cellinfo files
•Close all.
•Open QualPhoneData.tab as Mappable
•Create Thematic Map for Rx_Qual_Full with 2 legend < 5 and => 5
•Create a Query for FER > 1% and Label the MAP with this Query table.
•Select the bad spots ( where FER is very high )
Company Confidential 10/4/99 18
Filtered Spots- RxQual > 4
Bad Spot 1
Company Confidential 10/4/99 19
Creating Queries for Troubleshooting Causes
Create Following Queries
Query for FERTable : QualPhoneData.tabFER < 1Query Name: FER.tab
Query for Poor CoverageTable : QualPhoneData.tabRx_Lev_Full < -97 Query Name : Coverage.tab
Query for Call on BCHTable : QualPhoneDataARFCN_BCH = ARFCN_TCHQuery Name: CALLBCH.tab
Query for Call on TCHTable : QualPhoneDataARFCN_BCH <> ARFCN TCHQuery Name : CAllTCH.tab
Query for CoChannel Table: CALLBCH.tabCo_Channel P/I <=9 Query Name: CoChannel
Query for Adjacent-BCHTable: CALLBCH.tabAdj_A_ N/N-1 <=-9 OR Adj_A_ N/N+1Query Name: ADJCallONBCH
Query for Adjacent-TCHTable CALLTCH.tabAdj_B_ N/N-1 <=-9 OR Adj_B_ N/N+1Query Name: ADJCallONTCH
Company Confidential 10/4/99 20
Add Cause Layers
•MAP --- Layer Control
•ADD the following Query Tables in the following Sequence
Company Confidential 10/4/99 21
Identifying Layers
•Select Display for each Layer.
•Select a common style , but different colour and size for each layer.
Example
RxQual > 4 Size 18
Rxqual < 4 Size 18
Coverage (Rxlev < -97) Size 16
Co-Channel ( on BCH ) Size 12
AdJCallONBCH Size 10
AdjCallONTCH Size 6
Company Confidential 10/4/99 22
Troubleshooting - Coverage and Co-Channel
ZOOM IN -- On the First BAD SPOT
AND
TROUBLESHOOT THE CAUSE.
What can we conclude on BAD SPOT 1 ?????
Company Confidential 10/4/99 23
Troubleshooting - Bad Spot 1
Company Confidential 10/4/99 24
Which is this CELL ??
•Select QualPhoneData Layer.
•Check on Labels
•Select Labels
•Select CellID.
•Display it on the MAP
Company Confidential 10/4/99 25
Which is the cell ? 47450 !!
Company Confidential 10/4/99 26
Did the Call Drop ???
•Create RLT.tab Query for RLT < 8•Import as Label Layer
RLT = 0 , DROP CALL !!
Company Confidential 10/4/99 27
Conclusion
•BAD Spot 1 has poor quality and Call Drop•This spot is covered by Cell 47450•Poor Coverage. Level below -97 dbm•But Call should not Drop•The other Problem is Interference.
•Mobile is Hopping on 99 and 84•99 is also the BCH.•Co-Channel on BCH is very high. •50% of the time quality will be poor.•But Poor Quality is consistent.
•Channel 84 is also suffering from Interference.•No Adjacent Channel on 84 and 99•This means there is Co-Channel on 84 also. •It could also be multipath issue on 84.
•WHY NO HANDOVER
Company Confidential 10/4/99 28
Interference Measurements and
Troubleshooting
Company Confidential 10/4/99 29
Types of Interference
We already know ….
Co-Channel
•BCH - BCH•TCH - BCH•BCH - TCH•TCH - TCH
Adjacent Channel Interference
•BCH - BCH•TCH - BCH•BCH - TCH•TCH - TCH
Multipath
Company Confidential 10/4/99 30
Co-Channel
•Real Time Measurements with Interference Analyzer
•Secondary BSIC decode ( with specific level limitations)
•Primary - Interference includes Multipath also
•Discriminate between Multipath and Co_Channel by using :-- Secondary BSIC -- Measurement Status-- Delay Spread Chart
BCH - BCH
TCH - BCH•Real Time Measurements with Interference Analyzer
•No Secondary BSIC decode
•Identify TCH as the source by usingMeasurement Status - NO FCH
Company Confidential 10/4/99 31
Troubleshooting - TCH-TCH Interference
•TCH -TCH interference will be dominant when two TCH slots in both the re-use cells come in synch and they are ON.•Viper cannot measure interference on any Non-BCH carrier. So we need to take the intrusive approach. •Change the Frequencies and then measure, but this will also not be effective since TCH carrier is active only when call is on.•The most effective way is to measure the delta of the BCH carriers, since propagation will remain almost the same for both the BCH and TCH carriers, so if we measure ratio of F1/F9 in C2 , we can correlate this to the ratio of F5/F5 , there may be some difference with the practical values, since multipath effects are frequency dependent.
C1 C2
F1 F9
F5 F5
F1 & F9 : BCHF5 : TCH
Company Confidential 10/4/99 32
TroubleShooting - TCH-TCH
Company Confidential 10/4/99 33
Uplink Problems
Company Confidential 10/4/99 34
Troubleshooting - Uplink Problems
Create a PLAN WIZARD
•TX LEVEL•RX_LEVEL•CELL_ID•ARFCN•RADIO_LINK COUNTER
•Export the Pland wizard to Excel•Filter out CellId to the cell where troubleshooting is to be done•Filter out Tx Level = 5•Plot the Time-Chart for RxLevel and Tx Level.•Note the spots where the Rxlevel > UL_PCON Threshold and Tx_Level = 5•Plot these spots on the MAP
Company Confidential 10/4/99 35
Estimating Uplink Quality from Downlink
Power ControlThreshold
Tx_Level =5
Poor Uplink Spots
Company Confidential 10/4/99 36
Locating Uplink quality Bad Spots
RX_Level is near P_Con Threshold Ms Tx Level is max ( 5)
Company Confidential 10/4/99 37
Locating Uplink Bad Quality Spots.
Trend shows:High receive levelAnd High Ms Tx Levelsin this area.
Company Confidential 10/4/99 38
Locating Uplink Bad Quality Spots•Processing was done for 1 cell only.•At some areas for low signal level ( < -88), MS at full power•In another area for high signal level ( -75 to -85 ) , MS full power
•MS Tx Level is controlled by the network. •Network will ask MS to increase power if Uplink level is poor or Quality is poor.
•Link Imbalance will result into low uplink level even if DL Level is good.•Then MS will be at high power in all those spots where level is good. BUT THIS IS NOT THE CASE !!! ( as seen from two spots)
•This means this is a problem of Uplink quality being poor at good level.
•This can happen due to UPLINK INTERFERENCE.•This interference seems to be burst in nature !!!!
Company Confidential 10/4/99 39
Troubleshooting - Uplink Interference
•Uplink Interference can be due to:• Mobiles in reuse and adjacent channel cells• Spurs and Intermods from base stations• External sources
•Interference due to Mobiles will be bursty and intermittent.•The behavior and its effect on quality will be time dependent.•More interference during heavy traffic hours.•Interference from external sources can be continous or also time dependent if the source is not continously ON.
•Uplink Interference measurement needs long term monitoring , collection of data, processing the data and estimating the probability of interference , and also estimating the source.
Company Confidential 10/4/99 40 Qos.pre
Uplink Interference Monitoring Setup
BPF
Pre-Amp
Splitter
TRX1
TRX2
1A 1B 2A 2B
BTS
RX
PATH
•Replace the F1 by F2•F2 becomes the Carrier•F1 becomes the Co-channel interferer•Measure F1, F2, •Measure Adjacent Channel Interference also•Use the BCH Analyzer or Channel Power•Create Alarms for Power > Threshold for occurrence of 60secs.•Also configure the Spectrum Analyzer for F2•Record the data at least for 24 hours or in multiple breaks for known trouble hours.
Company Confidential 10/4/99 41
Uplink Interference - Troubleshooting
•Process the collected data and compute the probability charts.•Severity of interference can be estimated by correlating the carrier and interference charts•Time Chart of E7480 can also be used to be more precise on severity. •Time chart will clearly the conditions and instances when F2/F1 was below 9 dB.•Compute the Minumum, Maximum and Mean values for the interferer and troubleshoot the source of interference (next pg)•If Alarms have occurred, then analyze the spectrum analyze to understand the characteristics of this interferer, since alarm was configured for continous interference of 60 secs.
-105 to -95
-95 to -85
-85 to -75
- 75 & >
30% 40% 20% 10%
-105 to -95-95 to -85
-85 to -75
- 75 & >
40% 30% 20% 10%F2 - Carrier F1 - Interferer
Company Confidential 10/4/99 42
Uplink Interference - Troubleshooting
max. = avg. signal is always on
max. > avg. and avg. noise signal is intermittentand rarely on
max. > avg. and avg > noise signal is intermittentbut often on
power statistics
ch 1 ch 2 ch 3 ch 4 ch 5 ch 6 ch 7 ch 8 ch 9 ch 10
maximum power
average power
max. avg. noise no signal in channel
The minimum, maximum, average and noise floor values collected over the measurement period can be used to estimate the behavour and possible source of interference.
Company Confidential 10/4/99 43
Cell Optimization with
HP E74XX
Company Confidential 10/4/99 44
Optimization with HP E7475Cell Loading
C1
C2C3
•Cells C1 and C2 are reporting Blocking•Cell C3 is added to cater for capacity•Still C1 and C2 report blocking. Why ?????
Company Confidential 10/4/99 45
Optimizing - Cell loading
15 12 8 6 4
Reselection
C2: Reselect Offset of 6 dB( + for Cell C3, - for Cell C1 )
Optimizing with C2 Parameters in either C1 or C3
Phone
RCVROptimize by increasing C3 cell power by 6 dB-80 dBm
-97 dBm
-78 dBm
-78 dBm
Company Confidential 10/4/99 46
Optimizing - Cell Reselections
•Mobile Monitors the Neighbor cells BCCH Carriers and decodes SCH of the neighbors in the idle mode.•The list of the BCCH ARFCN’s which the mobiles will monitor in the idle mode is broadcasted in the System Information Type 2 Message .•More the neighbors , less the samples taken by the mobile per neighbor to the calculate the value of C1.•More neighbors of good and near to equal power levels will result into excessive reselections.•Excessive reselections can result into missing of paging messages•Solution to this problem would be to adjust power levels of base stations.•Adjusting power levels most of the time either effects coverage or enhances interference, since the terrain is not flat.•To optimize cell reselections, the best possible solutions are:
• Optimizing the BA list•Implement C2 Reselections
Company Confidential 10/4/99 47
Optimization - Cell Reselection
-75 dBm
-100 dBm
PHONE’s Reselections with this BA List
Geographical BA List for =
Optimized BA List for =
Phone
Phone PHONE’s Reselections with optimized BA List
Company Confidential 10/4/99 48
Optimizing - Neighbor lists
•Mobile reports neighbors as per Type 5 BA list• Number of samples collected depends on numbe of neighbors•Maximum 32 neighbor : for 32 neighbors, 3 - 4 samples per neighbor•Less samples, averaged reported value not authentic•Results in Ping-Pong effect of Handovers•Neighbor list must be optimized •This optimization can be done in a similar way to reselection, by using the BCH Analayzer. •BSIC decoding of the neighbors using the Receiver will also help in understanding the probability that the Phone will measure a re-use ARFCN of the neighbor set in the BA list.
Company Confidential 10/4/99 49
Optimizing -Handover Traffic
A B
C D
Company Confidential 10/4/99 50
Adjacent Channel Interference Reduction
Tight Re-use patterns can permit the use of Adjacent ARFCN in adjacent cell.
This should not pose an problem if Handover margin is set appropriately low.
If Handover Margin is set to 6 dB, Handover will occur from C1 to C2 at spot B itself
C/Ia = -1 db C/Ia = -6 db C/Ia = -9 db
A B C
C1 C2
Optimizing - Handover Margin
Company Confidential 10/4/99 51
Optimizing - Handover Margin• Selecting an appropriate value of handover margin is
essential to ensure good quality communication .• Receiver can be used to decide the value .• BCH Analysis on all BCH’s used in the network.• Plotting the Time Chart and analyzing the delta between the
source to target cells.• Also analyzing the quality at the same time, will help in
estimating the value of Handover margin for a desired quality.
• Handover margin set for a cell is applicable to all calls going on in the cells, to which this cell is a neighbor.