Top Banner
350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 0 0.5 1 V'( l ) V( l ) 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 0 0.5 1 w avelength (nm ) C one response
16

Trichromacy Helmholtz thought three separate images went forward, R, G, B. Wrong because retinal processing combines them in opponent channels. Hering.

Dec 21, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Trichromacy Helmholtz thought three separate images went forward, R, G, B. Wrong because retinal processing combines them in opponent channels. Hering.

350 400 450 500 550 600 650 7000

0.5

1

V'(l) V(l)

350 400 450 500 550 600 650 7000

0.5

1

wavelength (nm)

Con

e r

esp

on

se

Page 2: Trichromacy Helmholtz thought three separate images went forward, R, G, B. Wrong because retinal processing combines them in opponent channels. Hering.

Trichromacy

• Helmholtz thought three separate images went forward, R, G, B.

• Wrong because retinal processing combines them in opponent channels.

• Hering proposed opponent models, close to right.

Page 3: Trichromacy Helmholtz thought three separate images went forward, R, G, B. Wrong because retinal processing combines them in opponent channels. Hering.

Opponent Models

• Three channels leave the retina:– Red-Green (L-M+S = L-(M-S))– Yellow-Blue(L+M-S)– Achromatic (L+M+S)

• Note that chromatic channels can have negative response (inhibition). This is difficult to model with light.

Page 4: Trichromacy Helmholtz thought three separate images went forward, R, G, B. Wrong because retinal processing combines them in opponent channels. Hering.

350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

wavelength (nm)

RedGreen L-M+S BlueYellow L+M-S

Achromatic L+M+.05*S

Schematic color opponent response

+- +

Page 5: Trichromacy Helmholtz thought three separate images went forward, R, G, B. Wrong because retinal processing combines them in opponent channels. Hering.

350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

V(l)

wavelength (nm)

RedGreen L-M+S BlueYellow L+M-S

Achromatic L+M+.05*S

Schematic color opponent response

Page 6: Trichromacy Helmholtz thought three separate images went forward, R, G, B. Wrong because retinal processing combines them in opponent channels. Hering.
Page 7: Trichromacy Helmholtz thought three separate images went forward, R, G, B. Wrong because retinal processing combines them in opponent channels. Hering.

100

10

1.0

0.1

0.001

-1 0 1 2

Log Spatial Frequency (cpd)

Con

tras

t Sen

siti

vity

Luminance

Red-Green

Blue-Yellow

Page 8: Trichromacy Helmholtz thought three separate images went forward, R, G, B. Wrong because retinal processing combines them in opponent channels. Hering.

Color matching

• Grassman laws of linearity:()(l(l(l

ll• Hence for any stimulus s(l) and response

r(l), total response is integral of s(l) r(l), taken over all l or approximately s(l)r(l)

Page 9: Trichromacy Helmholtz thought three separate images went forward, R, G, B. Wrong because retinal processing combines them in opponent channels. Hering.

Primarylights

Test light

Bipartitewhitescreen

Surround field

Test light Primary lights

Subject

Surround light

Page 10: Trichromacy Helmholtz thought three separate images went forward, R, G, B. Wrong because retinal processing combines them in opponent channels. Hering.

Color Matching

• Spectra of primary lights s1(l), s2(l), s3(l)

• Subject’s task: find c1, c2, c3, such thatc1s1(l)+c2s2(l)+c3s3(l)

matches test light.

• Problems (depending on si(l))

– [c1,c2,c3] is not unique (“metamer”)

– may require some ci<0 (“negative power”)

Page 11: Trichromacy Helmholtz thought three separate images went forward, R, G, B. Wrong because retinal processing combines them in opponent channels. Hering.

Color matching

• What about three monochromatic lights?• M(l) = R*R(l) + G*G(l) + B*B(l)• Metamers possible• good: RGB functions are like cone

response• bad: Can’t match all visible lights with any

triple of monochromatic lights. Need to add some of primaries to the matched light

Page 12: Trichromacy Helmholtz thought three separate images went forward, R, G, B. Wrong because retinal processing combines them in opponent channels. Hering.

Primarylights

Test light

Bipartitewhitescreen

Surround field

Test light Primary lights

Subject

Surround light

Page 13: Trichromacy Helmholtz thought three separate images went forward, R, G, B. Wrong because retinal processing combines them in opponent channels. Hering.

Color matching

• Solution: CIE XYZ basis functions

Page 14: Trichromacy Helmholtz thought three separate images went forward, R, G, B. Wrong because retinal processing combines them in opponent channels. Hering.

350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 7500

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2

z

y x

CIE 1931 standard colorimetric observer color matching functions

Tris

timul

us v

alue

wavelength (nm)

Page 15: Trichromacy Helmholtz thought three separate images went forward, R, G, B. Wrong because retinal processing combines them in opponent channels. Hering.

Color matching

• Note Y is V(l)

• None of these are lights

• Euclidean distance in RGB and in XYZ is not perceptually useful.

• Nothing about color appearance

Page 16: Trichromacy Helmholtz thought three separate images went forward, R, G, B. Wrong because retinal processing combines them in opponent channels. Hering.

350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5Stiles and Burch 1959 10-degree bipartite field color matching functions

primary lights at 645.2 nm 525.3 nmand 444.4 nm

b10(l) g10(l)

r10(l)